Newscast: "Epstein Files: Mandelson Reported To The Police"
Date: February 2, 2026
Episode Overview
In this hard-hitting episode, Adam Fleming, Joe Pike, and Daniela Ralph break down the fresh revelations from the major U.S. Department of Justice “Epstein Files” document release. With over 3.5 million documents under analysis, the team discusses the latest findings—focusing particularly on explosive allegations involving former Labour minister Peter Mandelson, the implications for the UK government and Royal Family, and the wider political and ethical fallout. Amid Westminster’s reaction and a police statement regarding Mandelson’s conduct, the episode explores what these disclosures mean for British politics, public trust, and the accountability mechanisms for those in high office.
Key Discussion Points and Insights
1. Scope and Content of the Document Release
- Technical and Ethical Hurdles
- The BBC and media worldwide are combing through 3.5 million documents—messy zip files and nondescript PDFs, making the process complex and slow.
- "It’s not me individually going through three and a half million documents... we've got a team... It’s taking a while..." —Daniela Ralph (03:26)
- "Loads and loads of PDFs and zip files... very, very long coded numbers. It’s quite a clumsy, clunky website…” —Adam Fleming (03:55)
- Some survivors argue redaction has been inadequate, exposing private data unintentionally.
- "You've got some people saying, 'I didn’t know this was going to be made public… I didn’t want my name out there’…” —Daniela Ralph (05:49)
- The BBC and media worldwide are combing through 3.5 million documents—messy zip files and nondescript PDFs, making the process complex and slow.
2. Rare Audio: Epstein Speaks on His Own Criminality
- The podcast shares a rare interview snippet, possibly conducted by Steve Bannon, where Epstein acknowledges his conviction but downplays its classification.
- "That’s the only time most of us will hear Epstein talking about his own criminality..." —Adam Fleming (07:48)
- "There is a real sense of... laid back, relaxed arrogance… What was it about Epstein that drew all these people in?" —Daniela Ralph (08:06)
3. The Mandelson-Epstein Connection: Alleged Abuses of Power
- Mandelson Forwarding Government Information to Epstein
- Allegations include Mandelson sending Epstein details on the EU’s financial bailout in advance of public release, and on confidential UK government asset sales.
- "One of them... gives Epstein advance notice of an enormous EU bailout after the financial crisis... hours later, EU finance ministers did indeed approve that bailout…” —Joe Pike (09:34)
- On market-sensitive info: "That could have been a serious abuse of power here because there seems to have been so much contact…” —Joe Pike (10:44)
- Mandelson’s Social and Political Relationship
- Regular, informal, and sometimes lewd emails, e.g. “praying for a hung Parliament. Alternatively a well hung young man.” (14:34)
- Mandelson updating Epstein on Labour’s internal coalition negotiations in 2010, with details about Gordon Brown’s leadership and secret talks.
- "It just seems astonishing that at such a moment… Peter Mandelson wasn't just finding the time to let Jeffrey Epstein know about this, but going into so much detail.” —Joe Pike (13:37)
- Police Involvement
- Metropolitan Police now reviewing allegations of “misconduct in public office.”
- "The government want to change the system around holding peers to account for their behaviour…" —Joe Pike (19:43)
4. Royal Family Fallout: Sarah Ferguson and Andrew Mountbatten Windsor
- Closeness to Epstein
- Emails display Sarah Ferguson fawning over Epstein, with emotionally intimate and troubling messages.
- "Thank you, Jeffrey, for being the brother I've always wished for. You are a legend… I am at your service. Just marry me.” —Daniela Ralph quoting Sarah Ferguson (15:20)
- Epstein’s Influence
- Epstein appeared to hold power in the relationship, dictating terms for visits to royal properties and being courted for attention.
- "Epstein has the power. He is the power player… He is the one in charge of this relationship.” —Daniela Ralph (16:25)
- No Official Response
- "No responses from Sarah Ferguson, no responses from Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, and no official comments from Buckingham Palace.” —Daniela Ralph (27:48)
- Pressure is mounting on Andrew Mountbatten Windsor to cooperate with ongoing investigations.
- “A source at the palace has said... that is now a matter for Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and his conscience.” —Daniela Ralph (18:49)
5. Political and Legal Repercussions
- Westminster Reaction
- Government claims limited powers to discipline House of Lords members.
- Opposition parties (SNP, Reform UK, Lib Dems) pressing for police investigations and Lord Mandelson’s removal from the Lords.
- “Will the PM back a simple piece of legislation to strip Mandelson of his peerage?” —Ed Davey (19:43)
- Labour Party Reflection
- Keir Starmer’s prior defence of Mandelson now appears problematic as new details undermine previous assumptions about the relationship.
- _"That decision that Keir Starmer made… now looks like a pretty serious error." —Joe Pike (22:20)
- Journalistic and Ethical Responsibility
- The hosts reflect on press responsibilities amid a tsunami of both verified and fake material, ensuring due process and opportunity to respond.
- "I think it's unfair to send an avalanche of messages... focus on what the key allegations are..." —Joe Pike (24:26)
- AI-generated fakes and conspiracy content appearing in public discourse complicate reporting.
- “Welcome to AI generated material as part of this story... You have to be really careful…” —Daniela Ralph (25:58)
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- "It's not me individually going through three and a half million documents on behalf of the BBC..." —Daniela Ralph (03:26)
- “That’s the only time most of us will hear Epstein talking about his own criminality.” —Adam Fleming (07:48)
- "One of them... gives Epstein advance notice of an enormous EU bailout after the financial crisis..." —Joe Pike (09:34)
- "Thank you, Jeffrey, for being the brother I've always wished for." (reading Ferguson's email) —Daniela Ralph (15:20)
- _"He is the power player. They are offering things... and he just says, yeah, gives them a date and time and goes for it." —Daniela Ralph (16:25)
- “Will the PM back a simple piece of legislation to strip Mandelson of his peerage?” —Ed Davey (19:43)
- _"As to the matter of criminal investigations, of course, that is a matter for the prosecution services and the police." —Darren Jones (22:14)
- “That decision that Keir Starmer made... now looks like a pretty serious error.” —Joe Pike (22:20)
- _"Welcome to AI generated material as part of this story... We just want an answer." —Adam Fleming and Daniela Ralph (25:58, 27:04)
- "No responses from Sarah Ferguson, no responses from Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, and no official comments from Buckingham Palace.” —Daniela Ralph (27:48)
Important Segment Timestamps
- 03:26 – The process of reviewing the millions of Epstein files and technical challenges
- 05:49 – Survivors’ concerns over insufficient redaction
- 06:46 – Rare interview audio: Epstein on his criminality
- 09:34 – Mandelson’s emails: financial crisis bailout and confidential government information
- 11:31 – Government asset sale revelations forwarded to Epstein
- 12:38 – Mandelson updating Epstein on Labour coalition talks, Gordon Brown
- 14:34 – Informal, lewd communications – “praying for a hung Parliament”
- 15:20 – Email examples: Sarah Ferguson’s messages to Epstein
- 18:49 – Royal Family source: Andrew Mountbatten Windsor’s “conscience” regarding testimony
- 19:43 – Westminster and parties' reactions to the Mandelson revelations
- 21:33 – Parliamentary calls for Mandelson to be investigated/prosecuted
- 22:14 – Parliamentary response: calls for victim-centered approach, limits on discipline
- 25:58 – Challenge of misinformation and AI fakes among the real document dump
- 27:48 – No public responses from implicated Royals
Tone and Language
The episode mixes careful, fact-driven reporting with open, at times incredulous, discussion—a hallmark of the Newscast team’s accessible, conversational tone. Adam, Joe, and Daniela balance sharp analysis with frank reflection on how challenging the story is to cover, the complexity of the human relationships involved, and the broader implications for public trust.
Summary
This Newscast episode expertly maps the labyrinthine aftermath of the Epstein Files’ release, using BBC’s own findings and global media cross-verification. The team dissects major political and royal implications, highlights gaps in accountability for the powerful, and underscores the importance of careful, ethical journalism at a time when facts and misinformation are harder than ever to separate. The episode leaves listeners with a clear sense of the stakes and uncertainty that swirl around this evolving story.
