Next Up with Mark Halperin
Episode: What Charlie Kirk Assassination Reveals About Dems and Media, and Kamala's Book Tour Flops
Guests: Meghan McCain & Ben Ferguson
Date: September 23, 2025
Overview
This episode of Next Up with Mark Halperin addresses the aftermath and political significance of Charlie Kirk's assassination, focusing on the split reactions between conservatives and liberals—not just in politics but in broader public and media discourse. Host Mark Halperin draws from his first-hand reporting at Kirk's memorial, explores media bias, and discusses healing, division, and forgiveness with guests Meghan McCain and Ben Ferguson. The second half pivots to Kamala Harris’s problematic book tour, providing sharp, anecdotal critiques, and closes with speculation about future female presidents.
Main Themes
- The assassination of Charlie Kirk has deepened the cultural and political divide
- Media and political left’s response is viewed by conservatives as insensitive, biased, and lacking empathy
- Conservative community’s grieving process is contrasted with what guests deem as more chaotic left-wing responses to tragedy
- Christian faith, public forgiveness, and Erica Kirk's response as cultural touchstones
- Kamala Harris’s new book and tour seen as emblematic of Democratic Party dysfunction
- Reflection on loyalty, leadership, and the lack of strong Democratic presidential contenders
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Immediate Reaction to Charlie Kirk's Assassination
Timestamps: 01:18 – 19:53
- Halperin’s Reporting from Arizona Memorial:
- Describes unique energy at Charlie Kirk’s memorial—grief combined with joy and solidarity.
- "There was a joy at such a sad occasion to be there." (Mark Halperin, 02:58)
- Calls attention to the lack of an equivalent figure in the Democratic Party, stating,
- “There is no Democratic version of Charlie Kirk.” (Halperin, 03:51)
- Divergent Reactions:
- Explains that the right felt pain and loss both personally and for the movement, while many Democrats minimized it or lacked understanding.
- Media outlets characterized as failing to appreciate Kirk’s influence or the right’s sense of loss.
2. Media Coverage and Democratic Responses
Timestamps: 09:07 – 24:00
- Kerry from Chicago Caller (09:07):
- Draws parallel between media’s brief honesty about Biden’s cognitive decline and initial coverage of Kirk’s assassination:
- “After Charlie was murdered… I thought finally… we’re going to have an honest conversation about what’s going on. And there’s no possible way anybody could spin the assassination… I couldn’t have been more wrong.” (Kerry, 10:33)
- Criticizes national news outlets for misrepresentations and political spin even in tragedy.
- Draws parallel between media’s brief honesty about Biden’s cognitive decline and initial coverage of Kirk’s assassination:
- Halperin’s Analysis:
- Halperin echoes the caller’s sentiment, saying the media reverted quickly to old framing and failed to foster a national healing moment.
- Notable: Media and Democratic politicians compared or minimized the assassination in ways that, Halperin argues, would not happen if the political positions were reversed.
Notable Quotes
- “Even post-funeral… so rarely [do they] evince any understanding… of why Charlie Kirk meant so much…” (Halperin, 02:41)
- “The reaction to it all has been so confusing to me, particularly for people on the left…” (Halperin, 02:30)
3. Segments Highlighting Politicians’ Statements and Media Tone
Timestamps: 16:10 – 19:53
- Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) Equates Government Censorship to Political Assassination:
- Halperin rebukes “equating” these issues: “To equate them, to compare them… just—it’s just representative.” (Halperin, 17:30)
- Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) on CNN, Defending Her Timing/Critique of Kirk:
- Omar defends her public criticism of Kirk immediately after his assassination, refusing to separate his death from her condemnation of his speech:
- “Saying what Charlie did and who he was has nothing to do with his assassination. Has nothing to do with the timing…” (Omar, 18:36)
- Halperin laments the “mindset” that sees the political opponent’s death as a mere “conversation starter.” (19:53)
- Omar defends her public criticism of Kirk immediately after his assassination, refusing to separate his death from her condemnation of his speech:
4. Conservative Community’s Response: Healing, Forgiveness, and Solidarity
Timestamps: 31:24 – 47:10
- Megan McCain:
- Observes that, politically, “Republicans look like the more peaceful party… after a tragedy… When a figure on the left dies, it’s looting and chaos…” (McCain, 32:19)
- Emphasizes the “healing” effect of Erica Kirk’s public forgiveness at the memorial.
- Ben Ferguson:
- Shares his experience at the Kirk memorial; tells stories of mass prayer, calm, and solidarity:
- “When they Shut those doors… there’s a hundred thousand people… no one was angry… [they] held hands and prayed.” (Ferguson, 33:45)
- Contrasts this with perceived left-wing reactions to similar tragedy, implying a double standard.
- Shares his experience at the Kirk memorial; tells stories of mass prayer, calm, and solidarity:
Notable Moment & Quote
- Erica Kirk’s forgiveness of Kirk’s killer, viewed as a singular, spiritual act of grace:
- “Father, forgive them for they not know what they do… That man, I forgive him.” (Erica Kirk, recounted by podcast guests, 38:36–39:09)
- “She did what Jesus tells us to do… She has become a really, really significant national figure… spiritually.” (McCain, 40:21)
5. The Challenge of Forgiveness and Public Anger
Timestamps: 39:09 – 49:19
- Halperin questions why conservatives can’t extend the same forgiveness toward media figures like Kimmel or Olbermann.
- Ferguson distinguishes between forgiveness and accountability, especially when rhetoric incites further violence:
- “I do not want people to be canceled for what they say. I’m in favor of free speech… I just want accountability when you do say something as horrific as [Kimmel].” (Ferguson, 41:19)
- Guests detail personal experiences with harassment as public conservatives:
- “Anyone who is conservative and public about their beliefs… know[s] what it feels like to be harassed in public, to have people not want to serve you, not want to be around you. You're socially ostracized in so many different ways.” (McCain, 45:00)
- They call out Democratic leaders for not unambiguously condemning harassment of conservatives.
6. Media, Democrats, and the (Failed) Opportunity for Unity
Timestamps: 49:50 – 54:53
- Ferguson and McCain argue that harassment and political violence against right-leaning figures is insufficiently condemned by Democratic leaders.
- Reference to a poll that 42% of the youngest American generation see political violence as “necessary or acceptable.” (Ferguson, 50:30)
- “You couldn't get a unanimous vote in Congress to say what happened to Charlie Kirk was wrong. You got a unanimous vote with Republicans about someone that was killed in Minnesota weeks before.” (Ferguson, 47:46)
7. Kamala Harris’s Book Tour Flops: Tone-Deafness and Party Dysfunction
Timestamps: 54:53 – 70:21
- Halperin describes Harris’s book tour as “defined in her first two interviews by pulling her punches, writing stuff in the book that’s gotten attention pre-publication, and then when asked to repeat it, basically backing off.” (Halperin, 55:12)
- McCain:
- “This is one of the weirdest, I think, most destructive book tours for a politician I’ve ever seen… Any hope of her holding any office is completely off the table…” (McCain, 56:35)
- Critiques Harris’s disrespect toward Biden and self-pitying tone, comparing her unfavorably to Sarah Palin.
- Ferguson:
- Calls out Harris for “abandon[ing] all of it,” accusing her of inauthenticity and blaming others for her failures (58:47).
- Explains why loyalty matters in politics; draws comparisons to Mike Pence and Mitt Romney:
- “When you trash the party who gave you the opportunity… you end up just being a forgotten person.” (Ferguson, 62:54)
- All agree that no Democratic women in the current field are likely to become president and see the party bench as weak.
Notable Quotes & Moments (by Timestamp)
- 02:41 – Halperin: “They so rarely evince any understanding... of why Charlie Kirk meant so much...”
- 09:07–10:33 – Kerry from Chicago: “After Charlie was murdered… I thought finally… we’re going to have an honest conversation… I couldn’t have been more wrong.”
- 18:36 – Ilhan Omar: “I think saying what Charlie did and who he was has nothing to do with his assassination... it is a matter of record.”
- 32:04 – McCain: “I think people are still grieving and processing what happened... I think there's a lot of healing going on.”
- 33:45 – Ferguson: “…there's a hundred thousand people… no one was angry… they just wanted to be with other people.”
Final Section: Future of Party Leadership & Female Presidents
Timestamps: 70:21 – 73:22
- First Female President Picks:
- Ferguson: Sarah Huckabee Sanders is likely, possibly Erica Kirk if she enters politics.
- McCain: Tulsi Gabbard.
- Democratic Prospects:
- Both: “None of the above” from the current field; describe the Democratic bench as “very weak.”
- McCain: “They’re very joyless, and there’s no humor. That’s the biggest problem with people on the left when they’re running for office…” (72:23)
Concluding Thoughts
- The assassination of Charlie Kirk is seen by the hosts and guests not only as a tragedy but as a symbolic moment exposing a profound societal divide.
- Conservative voices express disappointment in the media and Democratic leaders for failing to acknowledge or unite in the face of tragedy.
- The Republican community is portrayed as coming together peacefully and spiritually; their challenge is coping with personal vulnerability as public conservatives.
- Kamala Harris’s struggles on her book tour are used to exemplify Democratic leadership dysfunction, lack of authenticity, and failure to build a compelling bench.
- Calls for more empathy and leadership are juxtaposed with skepticism that current Democratic leaders will step up; the necessity for grace, accountability, and renewal—on all sides—is a central refrain.
For listeners who missed the episode:
This conversation is a window into current conservative thinking about both political violence and leadership, offering candid, sometimes raw reflection from influential right-of-center media and political figures. It weaves personal experience, political mediation, and cultural diagnosis into a timely narrative of division—and possibility.
