← Scrolling with Hayley
Scrolling with Hayley
Newsom’s “Partner” Steals The Show - Scrolling w/ Hayley (Ep. 271)
01:00:10
In this episode of Scrolling: California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s “first partner” becomes the mainstream media’s darling
Loading summary
Transcript163 lines
- [00:00]
A
Welcome to Scrolling with Haley. I'm Haley Carnea. I hope everyone had a great Easter weekend. Let's get into the show, shall we? Gavin Newsom's wife is everywhere all of a sudden, and that can only mean one thing. We're gonna get into it. Plus, the Artemis 2 crew that is headed around the moon is already having some Internet and bathroom troubles. Plus, a millionaire actor is being outed as a major cheapo and a beta Sam saying he likes when a woman picks up the entire tab on a first date. Okay, princess, put your phones on. Do not disturb. The show starts now. Gavin Newsom, he is slimy. He is fake. He is a classic politician that you wouldn't trust as far as you could throw him. He's smooth in that he becomes whatever he needs to be in that moment to win over whoever is in front of him. We saw how he acts in front of a room of black people. He plays dumb, which is as racist as you could possibly get. Not shocking for a Democrat, but it is shocking for how much they talk about being anti racist. It's like the more they talk about it, the more obsessed with race they become. But when he's in a room of white people or Hispanic people or kids or on a podcast with even Charlie Kirk, he shape shifts. Do you remember that episode when he had Charlie Kirk on Gavin Newsom's podcast, and Charlie Kirk got Gavin to admit how stupid the whole transgender ideology is and how men don't have a place in women's sports? It seems like that would be common sense, but you don't really know where Gavin Newsom truly stands on anything, because it seems he doesn't stand for anything. He'll tell Charlie Kirk to his face that men don't belong in women's locker rooms, and yet he's the governor of a sanctuary state for transgender children. So he says he'll tell Californians not to go to the beach during a pandemic and tell them to stay home to save lives while he fine dines at the French Laundry. When someone is so sleazy out in the open, it makes you wonder what he's really like at home. And I actually don't even want to really know what Gavin Newsom is really like. But his wife, who he calls his first partner, seems to be just as slimy as and weird. She seems to be all over the place all of a sudden. They are absolutely propping up the Newsoms as the next potential first family because they're the Democrats only hope, and we need to get used to seeing her because she is not going anywhere anytime soon. Yesterday, Gavin Newsom made a video celebrating Easter. And there she was, kicking off the video even Watch Happy Easter, California. Today is a day synonymous with renewal, hope, and faith.
- [02:53]
B
Some attend church, some set off on an Easter egg hunt. But for all who celebrate, Easter brings moments of joy and reflection.
- [03:00]
A
It's a reminder that even after difficult seasons, new life and new beginnings are always possible.
- [03:05]
B
However you're celebrating this Easter, we hope the day brings peace, warmth, and time with the people you love. And so, from our family to yours, Happy Easter.
- [03:15]
A
Fake and phony. Sorry, it just. It comes off as fake and phony to me. I don't know. Her movements are so awkward and kind of weird. Like, it's unsettling. Unsettling is a really good word for it. It's sort of giving animatronic in a. In a way where she's like, moving like that and talking about Easter and it's just a little weird. So I looked back on Gavin Newsom's Twitter because I wanted to know if she's always in these Easter videos or if they're always doing this or if this is sort of like a new thing. The last time Siebel, Jennifer Siebel was in a Easter message video was in 2020, which seems that it might have been politically advantageous for Newsom to make it look like, you know, he was at home with his family when he was really out gallivanting. I don't know, other years, Gavin Newsom just sends out a tweet. So it just seems like maybe on election years he puts out a video. I don't know, although I didn't see a video for 2024. But it. It seems like his first partner, or so they call it, comes out of hiding when she needs to or when he needs her to. And because the Newsom family is the Democrats only hope in 28, it seems that Jennifer is going to be forced upon us. We will be hearing from her whether we want to or not. And just listen to how Jennifer wants us to. To listen to her viewpoints. But she disagrees with viewpoints. And if she does disagree, she wants those to be silenced and censored.
- [04:42]
B
Listen, my sons are really into sports, are so my girls. But my sons will watch their favorite athletes on YouTube or. And then all of a sudden you'll. You'll find this sort of alt right, extreme, you know, Jordan Peterson type speaking to my sons. It's insane. Connected to the sports culture. That's not healthy. Are you Kidding. So then our boys are learning hate, bigotry, misogyny, racism. So it's very dangerous, you know, And I think we have to take responsibility and we have to hold those in leadership, in tech accountable because they're making all this money and they're leaving our world in a very, very dangerous place.
- [05:30]
A
Isn't that so, Weir?
- [05:32]
C
The physical seal clap.
- [05:33]
A
Yes. Yeah, it's a seal clap in real time. It's so strange. And, you know, she talks about Jordan Peterson being this, like, alt right radical and that he doesn't come off that way to me. Maybe that's because I'm coming from a biased standpoint where I don't think that anything he's saying is radical, but I wouldn't even think that in terms of right wings. No one thinks of him. Even among our cohorts, no one thinks that he's radical.
- [06:03]
C
I hear that. And I think, manosphere, guys. Not once do I go, Sweet, Mr. Peter.
- [06:08]
A
Agree, agreed. And that's my viewpoint as well, where, yeah, if she had said, oh, my son's watching sports, and then videos of, like, Myron Gaines come up, okay, I could understand. Maybe she would be a little concerned or something. But to go full censorship is bizarre. And there's a reason why you're watching videos of sports on YouTube and then you get fed conservative content. It's because conservatives work out and liberals don't. So I'm not saying that liberals can't enjoy sports. Of course they can. But these algorithms are trained to give you what you want. And for the most part, people who like sports, people who hold themselves accountable in that way, they tend to be conservative. And I used to work in social media at Fox, and we had these social media meetings, and they would tell us to a T who the Fox News viewers were. So they do all this market research. They know what colors they respond to, they know what kind of videos they like, what they'll click on, things like that. It's so detailed. And I worked with another social media company that was working with me when I was making videos. This was, like, years ago, but even back then, this was post 2020. And they said that workout content is synonymous with conservatives. Conservatives, really, they like that kind of stuff. They click on that kind of content. These are the kinds of lifestyles that conservative people live. Again, it's not foolproof. I'm not saying every conservative is athletic and every conservative plays sports or watches sports and is healthy. That's not true. But there's a lot of overlap. So it makes sense that her sons would be watching sports stuff on YouTube, and then they might get fed a Jordan Peterson video. It's. It's kind of what we like. But then she called Jordan Peterson's viewpoints unhealthy. She called them hateful, bigoted, racist, misogynistic, dangerous. That's a lot of progressive buzzwords to throw out in one just to describe one man. And I would have loved it if the man interviewing her had the wherewithal to ask her for some examples. Those are some daggers that she threw towards Jordan Peterson, and she had no examples to back it up. Oh, how is Jordan Peterson dangerous? What has he said that is dangerous? What has he said that is misogynistic or racist? And I'm sure she wouldn't have been able to come up with any concrete examples. They never can. But Jordan Peterson is a Christian man and a free thinker, and it seems the newsoms are threatened by that. I'm not sure why they wouldn't want their sons to grow up to be like that. So since Jennifer Siebel is an expert in raising boys to be men, here she is discussing some of the ways she deconstructs gender norms at the home with her kids. Watch.
- [08:53]
B
I've given our boys dolls, even if they tear the head off, I've given them dolls to learn that care and caregiving is not just an activity that's reserved for women, but that it's also an activity that is a responsibility of men.
- [09:11]
A
Okay, so her. Her kids are ripping the heads off of dolls. So this reminds me of Toy Story. That kid Sid. Toy Story, who is like, a total problem child because he was ripping the heads off of the toys. So basically, she's an expert in raising little boys to be men. They're all gonna turn out to be Sid from Toy Story. But my thing on this is let kids be kids. Let boys play with what boys like to play with naturally. Let. Let girls play with what girls like to play with naturally. If you have boys and girls and toys for both, and your son picks up one of his sister toys, it's not that big of a deal. It's not like, oh, my God, he's gay. Um, I just think, let kids play. But to purposefully give your kids toys that are normally targeted. Targeted at the opposite sex and then give it to the opposite sex is performative and weird. And we were talking about this before the show, and Andrew and Josh are in here, and they asked, do you think that this is real? Like, does she actually do this? Do you think she's just putting on a show. I don't know if she actually does this or not. I think she's lying. I think she's got a mic in her hand. She's on some, you know, dumb feminist panel probably and needs to play the part. I don't know how old her sons are. I think based on that interview that Gavin Newsom did with Charlie Kirk, I think one of his sons at least is in high school because he was watching Charlie Kirk videos and Gavin Newsom admitted that his son liked that content. So that might be another reason why Jennifer Siebel was saying that her son was getting Jordan Peterson content. Probably because her sons are conservative. Her sons are probably closeted conservatives. That's how she knows she raises her sons to be, you know, this woke household. And they are, they're defying her. But anyway, I don't think playing with dolls is what is. What is going to make a man a good husband or not. That's not what makes a good husband. And I wouldn't really trust Jennifer Siebel's opinion on that topic because here she is talking about how she makes story time more female centered with her kids. Watch.
- [11:18]
B
What I've done with both my daughters and my sons is if I'm reading a book and the protagonist is a male, I just change the he to a she and it just normalizes. For my sons in particular, it's not even. I don't even just do it for my girls. I do it for my sons because I want them to see that women can be the center of a story, that women matter, that women are interesting. At the end of the day, we're all kind of like in this place in history maybe where we're recognizing what it is to ultimately deconstruct all these gender roles and ultimately be human. And that's exciting to me. So, you know, I'll just continue to kind of do my work and try and deconstruct all of these like limiting narratives about ultimately what it means to be human.
- [12:08]
A
Okay, all of these things come naturally, by the way. You don't have to force it upon people. You, these gender norms or whatever, they. They just come naturally because women do things that women like and men do things that men like. But anyway, Gavin Newsom has four kids. He's got a 16 year old girl, a 14 year old boy, a 12 year old girl and a 10 year old. I think boy, his name is Dutch, Dutch William. So I think maybe it's a boy. But anyway, anyway, they've weird like La kid names. But okay, yeah, I think I don't understand rewriting books in, in real time. You're reading a book to your kids and if the parents protag protagonist is a boy to change it to a girl, like why rewrite the story? Are there not enough female centered stories that already exist? I mean you can buy books that have female protagonists, but again, I wouldn't even think that way if I had kids and I was buying books half the time. Kids books. The, the main characters are animals and stuff. It's not even like who cares what gender they are, what sex they are. And it doesn't even cross my mind. Imagine setting DEI quotas in your own household when it comes to the stories that you read your kids. It has to be a very exhausting way to live to think about race and gender constantly. I can't imagine anyone really lives like this though. Again, I think this has to be for show. It's for the panel. It's all to put on a face to sell the lie to the Democrat establishment that these two are woke enough to be the next first family despite their white skin and their, and their heterosexuality. But Ms. Now didn't waste any time to start featuring Jennifer Siebel. So here she is, this is a few weeks ago, championing women's stuff and declaring that there is a war on women.
- [14:02]
B
Listen, there is a war on women in our country. Historically there has been sort of a dismissal of women's values. Our work has been rendered invisible, relegated or affiliated with care, empathy, collaboration and the home. And we've historically devalued that and really privileged sort of money making and power in our society where men have held the reins and where men have basically dominated and been in power. And so the pendulum swings. And while we've made tremendous progress in terms of gender equity, we are seeing increasingly, especially with the current federal administration, a rollback of women's rights. So whether it's investments in childcare, investments in Republic, Snap funding, the ICE raids which have separated families, a dismissal of violence against women, a reduction in support for victims of sexual assault, just a normalization that if something happens to women, it's just part of being a woman, which is horrific and ultimately so destructive, not just to our health and well being and our family's health and well being, but to our economy and to our democracy as a whole.
- [15:28]
A
This is the classic she just starts, doesn't know where the end of her sentence is, doesn't know where the end of her thought is. It's just ramble Ramble, ramble. Let me just talk about, you know, the female plight. And as a woman, this is news to me. That's because if you. It's only real. This like war on women is only real if you live in a perpetual victim mentality. If you're normal and aren't allergic to accountability, then these aren't real issues plaguing your life. This gender pay gap is really. Just because the careers that women tend to go after aren't as high paying, that doesn't mean that women can't be CEOs and super successful and richer than some men. In some cases they are. Which proves that this isn't a system keeping everybody down thing. It's based on the careers that women are choosing. Do accountants and financial advisors and attorneys and doctors make more money than kindergarten teachers, gender studies experts and therapists? Yes. Notice how I didn't say female. That's true for anyone who wants to become those things. If a man becomes a teacher, is he going to make as much money as a man who decides to be a lawyer? Probably not. Is the system keeping him down because men more make more money than him or did he choose his own adventure? That's how this works. It's just reality. And if you want to make more money, go make more money. We live in a country where you can do that. You have the power to do that. Man or woman. Doesn't matter how you were born or what you have going on in your pants downstairs does not matter. You can choose your own adventure. We live in a free country. If you want to make more money, go get a second job. If you want to make more money, go get a different degree and make more money. Like you are free to do that. I'm not saying it's not hard, but you can do that. Nothing is holding you back from doing that. So this Ms. Now host also cannot help herself. But to use this WOKE terminology like gender equity, which insinuates that women need a leg up, they can't do what men do because of this system keeping them down, this patriarchy. Patriarchy keeping them down. So what is it? Are women girl bosses that can do anything men can do or do they need help getting by? It can't be both. So what is it then? Jennifer makes this claim that women are being held back in this country because of SNAP benefits being rolled back and ICE deportations. So again, that insinuates that women need the government's help or they won't be able to survive. So basically you're a single Woman who doesn't need a man. But if you don't have a man, you're going to need the government. Really? They're not going to be able to survive without SNAP benefits. And then on the ice, immigration stuff. Should we just stop enforcing immigration law to help women? Women who are in this country illegally or women who are married to someone in this country illegally? No. Actions have consequences. You come in this country illegally, you might get caught for that. And in the Trump administration, you're damn sure going to get caught for that. You could either take $2,000 and self deport yourself or you're probably going to get caught. ICE is not screwing around. So actions have consequences. Unfortunately, the Biden administration sold all these people a lie. Come on in, we'll give you free stuff and blah, blah, blah, party's over. So sorry. But actions have consequences. If you want to come to this country, do it the right way. If you don't come this right, you don't come the right way, then you might be deported. And if you're married to someone who did things the wrong way, you might be separated and your kids might be separated again. That's because of the decisions that you made, not the system. There's nothing wrong with the system. There's nothing wrong with the laws that have been on the books and the agency that's been intact since 2003. There's nothing wrong with that. There was nothing wrong when Obama was doing it. People just hate now because it's Trump. So again, these are the only two things she can come up with with ways that the Trump administration is stripping rights away from women's SNAP benefits and ice, and she's all ready to fight dirty against the Republicans. So here she is out in front, slamming the Trump administration and their, quote, war on women. Apparently, Republican women are victims of this, too. She doesn't like them. But there's a war on women. Watch.
- [19:38]
B
Trust me. I'm not a fan of Pam Bondi nor Kristi Noemi, but I need to call out that it's no surprise to me that the first two prominent people pushed out of this administration were women. Let me explain the conservative women that Trump hand picks who align themselves with an agenda that controls women, restricting our rights, limiting our autonomy, and pushing us back into this straightjacket of femininity that is only in service of men. There's a familiar pattern here. Women are brought in packaged, Mar a Lago style and lift it up as long as they commit to wholeheartedly serve the interests of the patriarch at the top. Now, it looks like power or proximity to power with a big title, but it never comes with job security and protection. There's no secure place inside this handpicked patriarchal body that systemically disrespects, devalues and discriminates against women and girls. And this is where complicity comes in. Because when you align yourself with that value system, with a leader who has publicly devalued women, degraded them, and been found liable of abusing women, well, guess what, you're going to be the first to go. So while you're in a perceived position of power in this system that regularly diminishes and devalues other women, even if you help sustain and uplift this system, your power is only temporary. And ultimately they will come for you. That's the unfortunate truth. For all women, no woman woman is safe in Trump's Republican Party unless she has enough wealth or the ability to buy her own job security and safety. And so, my friends, regardless of your political affiliation, you might want to wake up and see this for what it truly is. It's a war on all women.
- [21:21]
A
Okay, so it's a war on all women. Women are, I guess we're at war. And because of the Trump administration, she said that femininity is a straitjacket. And other liberals, and we'll get to this later in the show during scrolling time, but other liberals and Holly weirdos believe that marriage is oppressive and it's slavery and they say that trad wives must be miserable. And liberals, you know, Democrats, that's supposed to be the party of women and women's rights and do women only deserve rights and respect when they're aborting their children and girl bossing too close to the sun? And then if you decide to choose another path, then what? Then the Democrat party doesn't care about you anymore. We've, we've seen this so many times that Democrats only care about their own. They only care about Democrat women. They only care about women who believe in what they believe in. The second they have a chance to slam a Republican woman, they do. They are not women supporting women. They are only supporting their own. We see this with Caroline Levitt and they make fun of her looks. They make fun of really any woman in the public eye, certainly in the Trump administration. You know, in this video, she, Jennifer Siebel Newsom was saying that, you know, she's already making fun of the way that MAGA women look like. They, they come into the administration and they look a certain way. So they're obviously talking about this Mar a Lago face that liberals have coined this term that essentially if you have lip filler and cheek filler or whatever, which liberals have had for years, but if you're on the right, then it's Mar a Lago face. Right? So it's, it's all very funny. I'm sure Jennifer Siebel knows him, has touched her face in some way. And of course, when Republican women do it, it's a problem. When they do it, not a problem. But then she says that MAGA women who work for the Trump administration, they don't have job security unless they're doing what their bosses want them to do. Duh. Nobody has job security. And if they're not making their boss happy, certainly not. I don't, I don't necessarily know all the reasons why Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi were fired, but their departments were catching a lot of heat in the media. I don't know how responsible Kristi Noem was for the media's attacks on ice, but Pam Bondi caught a lot of heat for their handling of the Epstein files, and rightfully so. She lied on national television about having documents that she didn't have. Then she delivered a PR nightmare for the Trump administration with the binders to a bunch of influencers. It was one of the dumbest political moves I've ever seen and I'm really not shocked that she got canned. Do I like her? Personally? Yes. I've met her. I think she's very lovely. Do I thank her for serving the country in this capacity? Absolutely. Do I think she should have been fired a while ago? Probably. But that's something that the Democrats can't wrap their heads around. They're always shocked when Republicans have the balls to call out their own or have a differing opinion or when we respect merit based decisions. If you're good at what you do, you get rewarded and if you're bad at what you do, you don't. It's pretty simple for people who aren't simple. But I don't even think that Jennifer Siebel is one the one that came up with this talking point. I think she saw Bill Crystal's tweet on this the other day and then decided to go to Instagram and then post the exact same thing and beat her feminist drum. So I saw this post on X the other day. Bill Crystal Bondi was awful, but no worse than Patel. Gnome was terrible, but no worse than Hegseth. Funny, it's only the women who get fired. So he posted that on X on April 2 and almost a million people saw it. I saw it. I'm assuming maybe Jennifer Siebel saw it and then Jennifer posted her video on April 4th. So is it possible that she had, you know, the same exact thought that only women are getting fired from the Trump administration? Sure, it's not groundbreaking, but this isn't the only time she's taken a page out of someone else's book. So you may remember when, when Michelle Obama said this, this wasn't recent. I mean, it was probably within the last few months. But Michelle Obama said that the country wasn't ready for a female president. Remember this? Do you think that that impacts the room that we've made for a woman to be president? Well, as we saw in this past
- [25:28]
B
election, sadly, we ain't ready. That's why I'm like, don't even look at me about running because you all are lying. You're not ready for a woman. You are not. So don't waste my time. You know, we got a lot of growing up to do and there's still, I'm sadly a lot of men who
- [25:48]
A
do not feel like they can be
- [25:50]
B
led by a woman.
- [25:50]
A
And we saw it. I just kind of want to get your guys opinion on this as men. Would you vote for a woman for president?
- [26:04]
C
Yes. Here's the problem. I don't want to get myself in trouble here, but Kamala, I mean, you're
- [26:10]
A
not going to get in trouble. I'm, I'm just curious.
- [26:13]
C
I mean, the thing is, is like, even with Kamala, man or woman, there was so much just like pure crazy dumb stuff.
- [26:21]
A
I didn't ask if you would vote for Kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton. I think those are horrible candidates.
- [26:26]
C
It's very weird to be like you weren't ready for a woman president and she wasn't ready to be president. So it's like, right? It feels like a weird take people
- [26:36]
A
in the chat, okay, so someone just said I would vote for the right woman. That is the take that I have. It's not so much. I don't go to the polls thinking, darn, I wish it was a woman or darn, I wish they were black. Wow, this is a great candidate. But I wish they were Hispanic. Like, I don't think like that. And most normal people don't think like that. You know, the newsoms probably do, but most normal people don't think like that. And would I vote for Hillary Clinton? No, absolutely not. I didn't think that she was a good candidate. Well, was she. You know, the Democrats always said she had the best resume. Like, she was good on paper because she had all this experience. She was a. An unlikable person, and she was fraught with all these scandals and all these, like, no, I would not want to vote for her. And then Kamala Harris, you know, she hit all the marks for the Democrats. She was black and Jamaican and Indian and whatever she wanted to be, she would be for them. And. And of course, she was a woman, so that was really all that was important. But she didn't have any policies that she stood for. The only policy that she really had towards the end was abortion access for women. And, you know, that's how you pick up liberal votes. But I don't think that she would have been a good president, despite her experience in California politics. I don't think that she had the right kind of experience. She wasn't a articulate speaker, and we saw that time and time again in her time as vice president, where she was really embarrassing. And between Biden and Harris, I don't know who was worse. I think at least Biden could blame it on his age. Harris had nothing to blame it on. It was just her own merit. And I think a lot of people saw through that farce where they're just propping her up as this woman candidate. First woman, first black first whatever. And once you kind of, like, see through the smoke screen, it's like, well, there's really no substance there. Just because you have a good resume doesn't mean that you didn't, you know? And I don't know much about Kamala Harris, but I don't really know much about her experience or, like, how she got to where she got. But I wasn't super impressed with it, so I wouldn't have voted for her. However, if there's someone that comes along, and I really can't think of a woman that I'd be super thrilled to vote for right now, but I would not. I wouldn't say no, I'm not going to not vote for someone because they're a woman, the same way that I wouldn't care if they were or weren't.
- [29:00]
C
Either way, it spooks me that someone
- [29:05]
A
in the chat just said, haley for potus. Absolutely not.
- [29:08]
C
Like, it scares me that, like, you should vote for her because she's a woman. Well, what it. Like, what if she can't do it?
- [29:15]
A
And also, like, what else? I'm not. I'm not going to vote for someone just because of their gender. I'VE never voted for a president thinking, well, thank God he's a man. I just like the policies. Like we've never had. We've never had a female president. So I've actually never even thought about 100 their biological sex. Like that's never mattered. It's always been. Because it's always been a man versus a man for the most part. Until 2016, I have never even thought about it. It's always been based on policy.
- [29:46]
C
100.
- [29:47]
A
Anyway, Jennifer Siebel said, you know, right out of the mouth of Michelle Obama, she picked this talking point up and then used it for herself. She said, the world, the America is not ready for a first partner.
- [30:04]
B
If our country is ready for first partner.
- [30:07]
A
Okay. Sadly, okay.
- [30:10]
B
I don't know if they are. I'd like to think, and I'm gonna work really, really, really, really hard for people to see what's been rendered invisible and devalued in our society and to go, oh, that's actually important. It's not always a woman behind a man, but the partnership is what's important. And then partnership will make the world go round. That said, I, you know, I have respect for institutions. California is sort of this petri dish of innovation. I threw it out as a whim to everybody when we were in the transition period. And they were like, they kind of like, liked it. They thought it was cool. And I was like, okay. And so if not me, hopefully somebody someday will continue to assert and stand up so that more people see the value of the partnership and the value of the care and that that person, whether it's a man, a woman, you know, gender non conforming individual, that they're critical to that person's success and that they're part of the other life, that other life of theirs that allows them to lead.
- [31:21]
A
I don't know where she was going with that. She's another rambler. Yeah, she, it goes. It's kind of like a Kamala Harris type thing where she just starts and then she doesn't know where she's going. So she.
- [31:30]
C
I've got a very serious question.
- [31:32]
A
Okay.
- [31:32]
C
Does she know what marriage is?
- [31:34]
A
Well, it's a partnership. I was just going to say that it's. So she's thinking, oh, well, we have to rebrand marriage so that people know that we're partners in this thing together. It's like, that's pretty much she's calling
- [31:46]
C
herself a woman, but she, with Nome, she's, she's his wife.
- [31:51]
A
It's the same.
- [31:52]
C
It's, it's the same.
- [31:54]
A
It's the same thing. And yeah, it's so totally bizarre. She's just trying to use this woke language now. And you know, she says in this interview, I don't think America is ready for a first partner. You don't think America's ready for a straight white blonde lady in the White House? I think what she really meant there is I don't think Democrats will vote for a straight white couple. So we have to rebrand as this gender non conforming bullshit so that we can convince these people to vote for us. That's exactly what she means. She's pretending to be gender non conforming in this, like, queer partnership. She's straight. She's totally straight. And in that clip too, she said that this was completely contrived. Well, during the transition period, we were kind of throwing this out and people liked it. It's like, okay, so you don't even really believe this in your real life. Which brings me back to this entire monologue here on her. On her. It's all fake. All of the woke stuff that she was saying, the reading. I don't believe for one second she thinks that Jordan Peterson is an alt right crazy person. I don't think for one second she reads books to her kids and change and gender swaps the characters. I don't think for one second she does all of these things. I don't think she calls Gavin Newsom her partner until she thought that it was going to be politically advantageous for her to do so. And again, why, if you are straight, own it. Why pretend to be in this queer partnership? Unless, of course, she's dropping hints about Gavin Newsom's sexuality. Maybe there are some similarities between the Gnome and Newsome households. I don't know all of this to say whether Jennifer's viewpoints are hers or just DNC talking points being fed to her. She is not speaking out for no reason. Because since when do we ever hear from these spouses of governors? You don't. Unless they're running for president. So the announcement that Gavin Newsom is running for president in 2028 must be imminent. Taking a quick break to tell you about blackout coffee. You know how important my morning coffee is. I'm sure it's important to you too. And I have been loving blackout coffee. Blackout coffee is a premium American coffee company known for bold flavor, high quality beans and roasting fresh right here in the US Every order ships straight to your do so you always have an amazing cup whenever you need it. What I love is how smooth and rich it tastes without any bitterness. With that perfect balance of flavor and energy getting me through busy mornings and long days, you could try their subscribe and Save programs. You can always have fresh coffee on hand, switch flavors anytime, pause or cancel whenever you want. Plus get discounted pricing, free shipping and reward points on every order. It is simple, flexible and saves you money. They offer dark roasts, flavored coffees, espresso blends and more. There is something for every coffee lover. Now is the time to try Blackout coffee. Go to blackout coffee.com and use code scroll for 20% off your first order. Once you try it, you won't want to go back. All right, so I wanted to check in on our Artemis 2 four person crew aboard this Orion spacecraft. They are officially more than halfway to the moon, or so they say. And I'm just kidding, this is a callback to my episode on Friday or my tinfoil hat thing on the moon landing. But they have been experiencing some issues on their journey. They've experienced very cold temperatures. Apparently they've been able to remedy, remedy that by fixing some certain fans. But they are bundled in there. Despite the four adults spending, you know, 10 days in a craft the size of an SUV. They are very cold. They have beanies on and jackets and things like that. And you'd think that since it's been 57 years since we've been to the moon that they'd have the technological advancements that would make this a smooth ride. But no. They thought that we'd have flying cars. But in 2026, NASA and the most accomplished astronauts in the world are relying on Microsoft Outlook to communicate. And it's got to be one of the most important parts of the mission, being able to communicate with people on planet Earth. And here's some audio of the astronauts complaining about the very system that is the bane of most corporate slaves existence. And I also see that I have two Microsoft Outlooks and neither one of those are working. If you want to remote in it, classic Optimus. On those two Outlooks that would be awesome.
- [36:18]
D
All right, we will join in on
- [36:20]
A
your PCD and we'll let you know when we're done. Okay, so the PCD is the personal computing device. That's how the crew gets on the Internet while they are on this journey. That's how they track their, their flight track and, and their timeline. And this they're not just using Microsoft Outlook on their to communicate, but they're using Microsoft Surface Pros. That is the computer of choice. And Microsoft hasn't made a statement on this just yet, but I think that this is pretty bad pr. I would say if your company is being relied on to provide the communication for astronauts in space as they embark on this historic journey that hasn't been done in decades. And, and they're complaining on live about on main. They are complaining about your product, saying that they have two Microsoft Outlooks and none of them are working. Those are bad odds.
- [37:16]
C
I'm a grade A Microsoft Outlook hater. As someone who's had to deal with it for the past four or five years. Good. I hate it.
- [37:26]
A
I'm trying to think. I used yeah, I used Outlook at Fox and at Newsmax. And I'm thinking if when I was in local news too, maybe it was Outlook. I think it was. Either way, I absolutely hate. Let me just go on my little, my Microsoft Outlook tangent. If you search, if you attempt to search for an email, you ain't finding it. You're not finding it. You can know exactly what the person said. Hey, I need to find the email where, you know, Andrew said this to me and you remember exactly the word to use. Like, oh, okay, perfect. If, if, if I want to find this email, if I want to bring it back up, if I want to call it back up, I just say this one word and it'll come right up. Nope. You could put in Andrew forever.
- [38:11]
C
You could put in Andrew and it would legitimately be like, here's email six months ago. Yeah, here's an ad from Lululemon that uses the word and inside of it.
- [38:20]
A
Someone just said, I love my Outlook. Are you crazy? Someone else said, I have no problem with my Outlook.
- [38:27]
C
Teach me.
- [38:28]
A
Yeah, maybe you have the magic touch or something. But the vast majority of people hate Microsoft Outlook. I don't know.
- [38:36]
C
I'm a Gmail guy.
- [38:37]
A
I, I, I do. Yeah. It's just Justin said that Gmail sucks too. They're all bad. Listen, we hate email. Let's just say that email stinks. And yeah, I, your, whatever your preferred platform is. Everyone, everyone hates to communicate via email. So, yeah. Anyway, they've also had some plumbing issues, apparently. This headline just cracked me up. This is from the cbc, but they, they said that the Artemis toilet, Houston, we've had a plumbing problem. Artemis 2 toilet is still on the fritz. And the engineers said that there was ice blocking the line that was preventing urine from being completely flushed on board. So they were having a little bit of a blockage, if you will. But then they said, and I don't know anything about space toilets. I'M not a plumber. I'm not a astrophysicist. Like, this is completely out of my purview. But they said that the toilet was working for poop, but not pee. The toilet was not flushing pee. But if you had to poop, you were in business. I don't understand that.
- [39:42]
C
Have you ever seen the toilets with, like, the two buttons on top?
- [39:45]
A
Yes.
- [39:45]
C
I'm assuming it has that function, and one pipe goes one way and one pipe goes the other for different storage options.
- [39:54]
A
Science, I guess, but any time I've seen a toilet with those two buttons, it's like you could press whichever one you want. It's still going to work.
- [40:01]
C
Yeah, but you're not on. You're not on a spacecraft. Once you're interspace, those two buttons completely change.
- [40:06]
A
Then it becomes very important. That's what I'm saying. Like, I've only been to. I've. You know, I've never been to space. I've only used the toilet on Earth, so I don't know what I'm talking about. But I just thought it was interesting that they were having pee issues and not poop issues, but that it begs the question, what happens if the poop tunnels gets frozen? Like, why was one frozen and not the other?
- [40:25]
C
I think everybody knows what happens when the poop tunnel gets frozen.
- [40:31]
A
This is bad. Someone in the chat said it's not healthy to suppress bodily fluids. I mean, this is. Yeah, this is bad. And then someone said, what if you pee in the. If the other one is available, why couldn't you pee in that? Again, I don't know what this looks like. I have no idea what we're working with here, so I'm just throwing stuff out.
- [40:49]
C
But have you ever been to, like, a national park?
- [40:52]
A
No. We talked about this. We talked about this last week. I've never been to one.
- [40:57]
C
There's a lot to dissect there. But it's like one of the. It looks like one of those toys. Let me see if I can get a picture of it real quick. Breaking news. Haley has never been to a national park.
- [41:06]
A
We talked about this yesterday. Not on the show, but after the show. I don't know why. I've never been. I've been to a bunch of. There are historic places that are, like, technically national parks that I've been to, but no national park. Like, I went to the national parks website, and there were places that I had been, but they're not official parks, if you will. Like, I've never been to Yellowstone. I've Never been to the Everglades. I don't know, I gotta get my. Listen, I have not taken a day off since starting this show. I hope you guys know I'm just saying I have prepped interviews in advance. I've never just been like, hey, I'm not coming in today. Maybe I'll start. I don't know, maybe I'll start just taking days off and going to catch me in the Everglades field trip.
- [41:50]
C
Here's the toilet situation.
- [41:52]
A
What does it say? This lid is not something. Because something bearing lid is up.
- [41:58]
C
Yeah, I was saying don't use it.
- [41:59]
A
Don't read it. Oh, okay, good. Could you imagine using that? And then you are in the size. The craft is the size of an SUV and you're with four other people and you've got. I hope none of them are poop shy. Anyway, until the capsule's bathroom was fixed, which it is fixed now, they were encouraging the astronauts to pee into essentially backup urine collection bags. So essentially. And again, I've never been to space, but I'm assuming peeing into a Ziploc bag while you're zero gravity is not easy. Not ideal, not ideal, not ideal. But anyway, they, they do have to get rid of the waste somehow. So watch this. They're giving. Taking a dump. Taking the camera a whole new meaning to show us a wastewater dump. So you heard Commander Reed Wiseman, that Commander Reed Wiseman reporting that they don't
- [43:03]
B
necessarily hear those wastewater dumps, but that
- [43:05]
A
they do see them. So you're getting a live look outside
- [43:08]
B
the windows of the Orion spacecraft as
- [43:11]
A
they conduct that wastewater dump. Nice. Isn't that crazy? It's. That is so.
- [43:20]
B
Integrity. We copy that. Successful wastewater dump.
- [43:23]
A
Successful wastewater dump. That is so Expo I. I would feel so exposed, you know, seeing the, the pee go out the window like that. I just, it's just again, I've never really thought about this kind of space travel because I just. It's not top of mind for me, but this is a very interesting way of going about it. Anyway, they did fix the toilet. Christina Cook, fix the toilet. Watch this.
- [43:50]
C
I, I heard that there was a
- [43:51]
A
little bit of an issue with the toilet. Which one of you was the plumber?
- [44:00]
B
I'll take that one. I'm the space plumber. I'm proud to call myself the space plumber.
- [44:05]
A
I like to say that it is
- [44:07]
B
probably the most important piece of equipment on board. So we were all breathing a sigh of relief when it turned out to be just fine. It was just an issue. I think of sitting for a long time and needing a little time to warm up a priming issue. But we did originally think that there could have been potentially something fouling up the motor. And luckily, we are all systems go.
- [44:28]
A
That's good. Even more good news, they were talking about Easter Sunday upon this journey, and I thought that this was very wonderful. So let's take a listen.
- [44:36]
D
I think these observances are important. And as we are so far from Earth and looking at, you know, the beauty of creation, I think the. For me, one of the really important personal perspectives that I have up here is I can really see Earth as one thing. And, you know, when I read the Bible and I look at all of the amazing things that were done for us who were created, it's you. You have this amazing place, this spaceship. You guys are talking to us because we're in a spaceship really far from Earth, but you're on a spaceship called Earth that was created to give us a place to live in the universe, in the cosmos. Maybe the distance we are from you makes you think what we're doing is special, but we're the same distance from you. And I'm trying to tell you, just trust me, you are special in all of this emptiness. This is a whole bunch of nothing, this thing we call the universe. You have this oasis, this beautiful place that we get to exist together. I think as we go into Easter Sunday, thinking about all the cultures all around the world, whether you celebrate it or not, whether you believe in God or not, this is an opportunity for us to remember where we are, who we are, and that we are the same thing, and that we got to get through this together.
- [45:47]
A
I think that was a really beautiful, unifying message on Easter Sunday. And he did include everyone, whether you're a believer or not, whether you celebrate Easter or not. But we do have to recognize how lucky we are. We're so lucky to be alive. The gift. It's a gift. You know, life is a gift, whether you're having a hard day or a hard month or a hard year or a good day or a good year. We're so lucky to even go through this life, even the. The good times and the bad times. And we have each other. And I think that that's such a beautiful thing and just such a nice message on Easter Sunday. So I thought that that was very cool. You know, you're floating above space. You're floating above Earth. You're not even on Earth. And you're. You're am amongst all of the, you know, stars and all of God's creation and just to. To bring us back down to earth a little bit. No pun intended, I thought was very cool. Let's get into scrolling time. All right. We have to talk about Robert Pattinson. Do you guys know Robert Pattinson? He's an actor best known for, I would say, Twilight. He was also in Harry Potter, but he got. Really. Got his start, I think, with Twilight. That's when people really started to get on the Robert Pattinson train. What else has he been in?
- [47:14]
C
Lighthouse. Good Times Lighthouse. He's in the new Dune. He is a master actor. The Batman.
- [47:21]
A
He was in Batman.
- [47:23]
C
He is the Batman.
- [47:24]
A
Oh, I didn't know that.
- [47:26]
C
Yeah. My guy is top tier.
- [47:28]
A
Okay. Top tier. Well, he's in a new show or. I'm sorry, a new movie called the Drama, and Andrew was telling me about this movie. No spoiler alerts here, but they are. He is starring alongside Zendaya and she's a great actress as well. So I would go see it. And they're doing a lot of press together. They sat down with Lad Bible and answered some questions about the Internet's biggest debates. And as someone who spends a lot of time on my phone, I can confirm that these are debates that really go off. They pop off. People are very opinionated about them. So the first one is, who should pay on a first date? This is what they said. You should always split the bill on a date. Always. I'm kind of in the middle. I think it depends. I'm also down for, like, back and forth.
- [48:20]
C
Back and forth.
- [48:20]
A
Yeah, I got this one. You got that one kind of thing. What about a first date? On a first date. I mean, it would be nice if they paid for it. A little chivalry. Not very sexy. Not very sexy to what?
- [48:34]
C
To, like, not pay?
- [48:35]
A
Yeah. Yeah.
- [48:37]
C
But I find it quite sexy when a girl does it if she does a secret pay.
- [48:41]
A
Oh, okay.
- [48:42]
C
And I'm like, all right. She's gonna take care of me.
- [48:44]
A
Yeah, I like it.
- [48:46]
C
I like.
- [48:48]
A
I mean, obviously they're joking here, but he's very wealthy, and I think that it was odd to, like, who is he dating? Is he still with FKA Twigs? Wasn't he with someone? I don't know if he's married or not. I have to look it up. Is he married?
- [49:06]
C
I don't think he's married. Hold on. Give it a googs.
- [49:10]
A
He. Oh, he secretly married suki Waterhouse in 2016, but I think he was with FKA Twigs. This is how. I'm just off my Robert Pattinson trivia because I didn't even know that he was with Suki Waterhouse, but apparently they're married. Congratulations, Robert. So I. I guess Suki Waterhouse paid on the first date. He was like, I think it would be really hot if the girl secretly paid, like, went, you know, hey, I'm gonna go to the bathroom. And then she goes to the bathroom. But instead of going to the bathroom, she stops at the, you know, hostess stand or whatever and says, hey, here's my card. Just take care of it for us. And then she goes back to the table and it's like, you know, it's all taken care of.
- [49:50]
C
It feels like something you do for, like, your father in law. Not. Yeah. First date.
- [49:54]
A
Yes. Like, hey, I want to surprise this person. I. I don't want this person to pay. Let me make sure that I get the bill first kind of a thing. Totally a father in law situation. I would agree with you. Yeah. That it's odd on a first. No, I actually, if a man did it on a first date, I would be impressed. And I would be. I love when I come back to the table and it's just paid for. It's great. Then I don't have to be like, hey, like, can I. You want to split this? Or whatever.
- [50:20]
C
I was about to. That was going to be my next question. Not to get.
- [50:22]
A
Do I do that?
- [50:23]
C
No.
- [50:24]
A
My bag.
- [50:25]
C
Have you ever been on a date where, like, you thought they were going to pay and they didn't? You just kind of have to sit there.
- [50:31]
A
I went on a date. My friends love this story. They think it's so funny. I went on a date with this guy who is Irish. So again, maybe this is. Is a European, like a UK thing and Robert Pattinson, also from the uk. But I went on a date with an Irish guy when I was living in New York City, and we went and just did topgolf and he paid and I offered to split it, because back then I would do that. Now I don't do it. Now I don't even pretend. Like, if you're taking me on a date, just pay for it on the first date. And then once we start dating, it's not a big deal. Like, I'll pay for certain things, but first date, you're paying. But I did offer back then. I said, hey, can we, like, do you want to split it? And he said, no, I got it. Then he Venmo charged me for my half.
- [51:20]
C
Excuse me.
- [51:21]
A
Yep.
- [51:21]
C
A Venmo charge.
- [51:23]
A
Yes. And it was $30. He venmoed me. He charged me $30. So the entire thing was 60 bucks.
- [51:32]
C
What?
- [51:32]
A
It's not like it was. We went to dinner and it was like $230 or something like that. And he was like, oh, yeah, let's split it. No, he. Venmo charged me $30.
- [51:41]
C
Venmo charges? Diabolical.
- [51:43]
A
I agree. I think it's crazy. Someone. Someone in the chat said, what a tiny dick of a guy. Bad date.
- [51:49]
C
I've only Venmo charged one person, but I got, like, tricked into paying for her meal. Like, my friends pulled a prank kind of.
- [51:57]
A
Okay.
- [51:57]
C
There were. Everybody was in a couple except for me and the lady I. Young lady I was with, but we weren't like, seeing. We did. We had just met each other at the dinner.
- [52:06]
A
Oh, yeah. So it's like, I'm not going to pay for this. Yeah.
- [52:08]
C
And my friend was like, oh, just put all her stu. His. And everybody laughed. But then the waitress was just like, oh, heck yeah, I got you, girl in front of me.
- [52:16]
A
Yeah.
- [52:17]
C
She ran up the craziest tab I've ever seen in my whole life.
- [52:21]
A
See, that's. That's too bad. And I'm totally fine with paying if it's astronomical or something, or we're going and doing a. I don't know. I'm. I'm fine with paying, but on a first date, I think that it's nice if he pays and also if I offer to pay and you need the 30 bucks, like, just take me up on it. But I think he was embarrassed to, like, split it in real life. And then later on, he wanted to Venmo charge me. And I could have just. I could have ignored it.
- [52:48]
C
I sent the Venmo. I was like, a you're crazy meal. I need like, a little something bad.
- [52:54]
A
Yeah. And that's, I think, fine. But. And someone said, how badly did you beat him? But I don't even remember. I don't think it was like that. And I could have just ignored it, but I thought, if you need the 30 bucks that bad, like, allow me.
- [53:08]
C
You put a little. Little extra in there, too. So.
- [53:10]
A
Yeah, like, hey, keep the change, loser. Anyway, so that's my take on who should pay for a first date. I think that the guy should pay. Anyway, next debate, open bar or not at a wedding. Watch this. All weddings should have a free bar. Already have a free bar. See, I haven't been to a lot of weddings. I didn't know this was a point of contention because I was like, well, what if, you know, if you want to have a bar, but you can't necessarily afford it and your friends just have to buy their own. But I'm just saying. I'm just saying, you know, it's. Everybody's situation is different. But I've not been to enough, you know, weddings to really know, like, what's.
- [53:47]
C
If you can afford a wedding, you can afford, like a keg. It's like 50 bucks.
- [53:52]
A
Okay. I'm the guy that wants a girl to pay. I'm not well versed in wedding etiquette.
- [54:01]
B
Some moonshine.
- [54:04]
A
Bring your own bottle.
- [54:06]
D
Everyone bring a bottle.
- [54:07]
B
That'd be nice, right?
- [54:08]
A
There you go.
- [54:09]
C
All right, fine. Here. I could disagree, though. I feel bad now.
- [54:15]
A
Yeah. So this is the guy that wants the girl to pay for him on a date, and now he's demanding that a wedding have an open bar. And I agree. I think that weddings should have an open bar. But if you're trying to, you know, save a few bucks, there's ways to do it. My friend got all of her wedding alcohol at Costco, and they said that if you. Whatever you don't use, you can. You can bring back to Costco, you return it, and they'll. They'll take it back. So that was a good way to do it. Like, budget friendly, I guess. But I'm. I'm pro open bar at a wedding. I mean, if I'm coming all the way to celebrate you, I would like to do it with a little alcohol in my system. What do you guys think? I've never been to a wedding actually without a open bar.
- [55:01]
C
I think I've been to one. And the sentiment from every person there is kind of like a bummer.
- [55:08]
A
Yeah, there's also a lot of.
- [55:10]
C
I get it, it's expensive, but the.
- [55:12]
A
Yeah, it is very expensive. Like, at this point, I don't think that I would have a wedding because to have a good wedding these days, it's almost a hundred thousand dollars and so expensive. People go over that, and I simply don't have that. So I would just do a church thing and probably call it a day. But people. I mean, yeah, my friends have had some very extravagant weddings, and I'm happy for them, but it just seems crazy to spend on one day. But if I were to do anything, I would make sure that there was alcohol. Alcohol and good music. Like, you can't. You can't cheap out on those things. And anyway, that's my. That's my take on that. But this next video, and this is the Last thing I have is Leslie Jones. Leslie Jones is an actress. She was on Z Way's podcast. And here she is talking about marriage and how oppressive it is.
- [56:04]
D
I think marriage is legalized slavery.
- [56:06]
B
You do? Yes, I do. Say more because if I'm thinking about slavery and I'm thinking about marriage, there are two different images that come.
- [56:12]
D
Absolutely not. I don't think. I don't know how you don't. Man is. Especially if he expects you to be a trad wife, he might as well pull out a whip in the chain.
- [56:24]
A
Wow. So there are young people watching who might be wanting to get married. What would you say to them?
- [56:30]
D
Don't.
- [56:31]
B
Don't get married. No.
- [56:33]
A
Okay. Oh, God.
- [56:35]
D
You are crazy.
- [56:36]
A
How am I crazy? You are crazy.
- [56:38]
B
You're saying that marriage is.
- [56:39]
D
No, I don't believe in the marriage. No, I don't think so.
- [56:42]
A
You wouldn't get married?
- [56:43]
D
No. And I don't think it's beneficial for a woman at all.
- [56:46]
A
Okay. So Leslie Jones says that it's not beneficial for a woman at all. And I would just like to throw this out to the chat. If you are married, is your wife, does she feel like this is a Stockholm syndrome type situation? Is she oppressed in any way? Because I asked my friends who are married, they disagree with this statement. They, they love their husbands. I think if you maybe choose the wrong person, you might feel like you're trapped. But if you pick the right person, then it should be a lovely partnership like we were talking about earlier. And the comments on this video are crazy. I mean, people are agreeing with Leslie Jones here. Motherhood is also slavery. Marriage originated as a sale. Sell your daughter to a man for money or land. Been married for 33 years. She's absolutely correct. I love my marriage and husband. But if I, if I could, I'd do it differently. I would still choose my husband, but live in separate homes. And people are saying it only benefits the man. Working is also slavery. Someone said, I was a married single mom for years, been married six years. Don't do it. The ring is the chain. I'm married. I love my husband. But I agree, don't ever do it. Very interesting. And then someone saying, you know, this might be a little biased as someone going through divorce. Marriage is nothing more than a financial contract. It's not romantic, it's not commitment. I think if you don't think of it biblically, then yeah, if you're just getting married because it's the social thing to do and you think that this is just the next step in your relationship, and you don't have that mutual understanding of the biblical contract, then yeah, then it's just a financial contract, and that's why you probably are all very unhappy. But to say that marriage is legalized, slavery is wild because both parties enter into it willingly because they're in love with each other and they want to spend the rest of their lives together, that's not slavery. That is entering into a partnership that you want to be in. And I think if you choose a loser, then maybe you're unhappy. But I thought women in 2026 were better, stronger, smarter, faster, more capable. So if all of those things are true, then why would women, if they're so smart and capable, be entering into slavery? Maybe it's because they're smart enough to know that that's not true. All right, thank you for watching. I will see you right back here tomorrow. Bye.
- [59:26]
C
Vince Colonnades is redefining News Talk.
- [59:29]
A
I'm Vince Colonnaise, host of the Vince Podcast. I'm bringing you the truth beneath the headlines of all of the nation's top stories. In depth interviews. We feature newsmaking interviews with the top guests on the whole planet. And I'll ask the questions you only dream of other interviewers asking. And a front row seat to the most important conversations of the day. It's a show with an obsessive focus on what's good for America. You are going to love Vince the Vince Show.
- [59:53]
C
Follow and listen on your favorite platform.