Taxpayer-Funded Dentures & Prison Porn - Scrolling w/ Hayley (Ep. 299)

Summary

Podcast Summary: Scrolling with Hayley

Episode 299 – "Taxpayer-Funded Dentures & Prison Porn"

Host: Hayley Caronia
Date: May 14, 2026

---

Episode Overview

In Episode 299, Hayley Caronia brings her signature conservative commentary and wit to a range of hot-button issues: government funding for dental care for unhoused populations in California, reports of taxpayer-funded tablets enabling illicit activity in state prisons, recent controversies involving transgender access in schools, and a critical take on the increasing and potentially dangerous reliance on AI for law enforcement and HR decisions. The episode also features candid discussion, listener banter, and a touch of humor, especially in its lighter closing about the pitfalls of AI job interviews and Oreo serving sizes.

---

Main Discussion Points & Insights

1. California’s Homeless Dental Program ("Homeless Not Toothless")

• [01:30] Hayley opens with strong criticism of LA Mayor Karen Bass’ initiative providing dental care (veneers) to homeless people, funded by taxpayers.
  • Hayley asserts that the program mistakes the root cause of homelessness, blaming addiction (especially meth use) rather than lack of dental care.
  • Notable Quote:

    “You can’t succeed without teeth. You also can’t succeed if you’re on meth. I think she’s missing...a key part of why these people cannot succeed.” – Hayley [03:00]

• She notes the charity’s history—$11 million in pro bono services, 135,000 patients, including veterans, “unhoused LGBTQ youth,” foster youth, and elderly.
• Hayley questions whether using taxpayer funds is appropriate, emphasizing that “voters never receive the benefits” of these programs.
  • Notable Quote:

    “Democrat voters never get the free health care. It goes to the homeless people. It goes to migrants. They’re just footing the bill.” – Hayley [05:50]

• Humor around shifting language ("unhoused" vs. "homeless") and program naming.

2. Critique of Policy Priorities

• [09:40] Hayley distinguishes between effective charity efforts (suits, haircuts, job support for homeless) and inefficient government overreach.
  • She highlights the issues of substance abuse and criminal record as primary barriers to employment, not dental appearance.
  • Notable Quote:

    “There are a ton of jobs you can do...from home with no teeth.” – Hayley [10:34]

• The co-host jokes about starting with the teeth to boost confidence but Hayley insists sobriety and a stable living situation matter most.

3. Taxpayer-Funded Tablets for Inmates

• [12:14] Hayley shifts to California’s $189 million prison overhaul and Newsom’s policy of giving inmates tablets.
  • The rationale: promoting “digital equity for justice-impacted individuals.”
  • Hayley ridicules the terminology and points out the lack of similar access for law-abiding Californians.
• Reports reveal that inmates use these tablets not for education, but to sext, view pornography, and (disturbingly) groom minors.
  • Notable Quotes:

    “If you’re a criminal though...go commit a crime, go sit in a jail cell, get a free tablet. Easy.” – Hayley [15:00]
    “Freaks are gonna freak. So they go to jail and they’re up to the same stuff.” – Hayley [17:34]

• Hayley calls for limiting inmate access to books and monitored communication only.

4. Transgender Controversies in Public Schools

a. North Carolina (Cox Mill & Mount Pleasant High)

• [19:35] Audio clips of young female students emotionally recounting discomfort and lack of privacy with transgender (male-to-female) students in bathrooms/locker rooms.
  • School officials reportedly dismiss these safety complaints as "too political."
  • The principal told girls to "go somewhere else" if they feel uncomfortable.
  • Notable Quote (student testimony):

    “When students speak up about safety and nothing happens, you send a message that we don’t matter. You send a message that girls are expected to stay quiet, stay uncomfortable, and deal with the situation by themselves. That is not leadership, that's failure.” [21:06]

b. Loudoun County, Virginia

• Hayley recounts the 2021–2025 sequence: a male student in a skirt assaults a girl in a bathroom, is quietly transferred, reoffends, and the school board doubles down on “inclusive” bathroom policy (“Policy 80-40”).
  • The second incident, with a female trans student entering boys’ locker rooms and filming, led to boys being investigated, not the perpetrator.
  • Notable Quote:

    “Why does anyone have to live in their fantasy world?...For a while there, we had Governor Glenn Youngkin...now Virginians have Abigail Spanberger, who would sooner fight for the rights of the mentally ill trannies than she would for the girls who were crying and begging to be seen and heard.” – Hayley [30:00]

• Hayley links these policies to further, more extreme cases—including a teacher plotting a school shooting, whom she describes as part of a broader trend of “mentally ill” individuals enabled by woke ideology.

5. AI and Its Pitfalls

a. Botched Facial Recognition & Wrongful Arrest

• [33:21] A Tennessee grandmother arrested for five months due to a flawed AI match in a North Dakota bank fraud investigation.
  • Comment from her lawyer and legal expert about dangers of AI-based policing.
  • Notable Quote:

    “She should be the new owner of North Dakota at this point.” – Co-host [35:25]

  • Hayley is incredulous and emphasizes need for human oversight.

b. Corporate Use of AI (Lowes/HomeDepot Surveillance)

• Discussion about AI-powered camera systems for surveillance and tracking at retailers; concerns about privacy and potential for abuse.

c. AI in HR—Job Application & Age Discrimination Lawsuits

• [49:32] The company Workday faces lawsuit for alleged discrimination (age, race, disability) through automated resume screening.
  • Hayley and co-host bemoan the lack of human touch in hiring; AI interviews include technical glitches and bots interviewing each other.
  • Notable Quotes:

    “It is so, like, rude. It’s so rude.” – Hayley [57:15]

d. Mental Health & AI Suicide Case

• Story of a young man who committed suicide after allegedly being given “affirmative” advice by AI. Family blames OpenAI, citing lack of safety nets. Hayley expresses sympathy but points to broader issues of parental awareness and personal responsibility.
• PSA: 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is shared.

---

Memorable Moments and Quotes

• “You have to be delusional to not realize that this sheds light on the fact that there’s still a huge problem that you haven’t fixed.”—Hayley [08:00]
• “Criminals are gonna criminal. This is why we don’t give up guns. This is why, you know, everything that these people are in jail for is already illegal, isn’t it?” – Hayley [16:00]
• Student: "If this board refuses to listen before something serious happens, the responsibility will fall on y’all, the ones who ignored all warnings." [21:06]
• “Freaks are gonna freak...this is exactly why I say there’s no rehabilitation for these freaks.” – Hayley [17:34]
• “It is so, like, rude. It’s so rude [to be interviewed by an AI].”—Hayley [57:15]

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• 01:30 – Critique of CA homeless dental policy, “Homeless Not Toothless”
• 05:20 – Commentary on recipients of the program (LGBTQ youth, etc.)
• 09:40 – Differences between government policy and private charity
• 12:14 – CA’s taxpayer-funded inmate tablets, “digital equity” discussion
• 16:00 – Tablet misuse in prisons: crime, grooming, porn access
• 19:35–22:38 – School bathroom privacy: audio testimonies from affected girls, lack of support from school officials
• 25:00 – Loudoun County’s ongoing bathroom and abuse scandals
• 33:21–36:42 – AI facial recognition leads to wrongful arrest/jailing of grandmother
• 37:28 – AI surveillance in retail and car technology “kill switches”
• 42:11 – AI use in the workplace and limits of technology
• 44:32 – OpenAI suicide case and discussion of AI's role in mental health crises
• 49:32 – AI in HR/recruitment, discrimination lawsuits
• 56:33–58:29 – Hilarious AI job interviews go awry: bots interviewing each other, glitching, etc.
• 58:30–61:26 – Comic relief: Job interviewee’s Oreo “weakness,” host banter about serving sizes and junk food

---

Style and Tone

Hayley’s tone is sharp, sarcastic, and unapologetically conservative. She frequently uses humor to underscore points (e.g., “She should be the new owner of North Dakota,” and “If you’re a criminal...get a free tablet”). The episode is fast-paced, opinionated, and occasionally irreverent, especially in its language around progressive policy.

---

Conclusion

This episode exemplifies Hayley’s blend of cultural commentary, political critique, and comedic asides. It covers the complexity and unintended consequences of progressive policies, highlights dangers of blind reliance on AI, and closes with a relatable, lighthearted discussion. The show ultimately reinforces Hayley’s message: be skeptical of big government and unchecked technology, and always maintain a sense of humor.

---

For listeners looking for more:
Hayley’s next episode will feature a “super scroll” with even more headlines and analysis. Listeners are encouraged to subscribe and join the chat for continued, lively commentary.

Transcript

[Hayley Carania]

Hello and welcome to Scrolling with Haley. I'm Hayley Carania and if I have any viewers right now or listeners from California, get ready. Get ready to empty your wallets, empty your piggy banks in your pockets. Because there is a homeless meth head that needs a new shiny set of veneers. And it's for the needy. They need them. And there's nobody more deserving then California inmates are getting taxpayer funded tablets and they are using them for good. No, I'm just kidding. They're using them for bad. They're using them to groom minors and watch porn. Plus AI is the future. The future is here, but it's not perfect yet inside how botched facial recognition ended up with an innocent woman behind bars. All that and much more is coming up. But first, a reminder to subscribe if you haven't already. Rumble.com Haley subscribe to the Bongino Report channel. Subscribe on Spotify, Apple podcasts, I heart, wherever you listen, even the platforms you don't listen to. Go and subscribe, leave five stars and tell a friend. And I also want to tell you about Beam's Dream Powder. Let me just tell you, this is different. Not just because it changed how I sleep, but because of the great folks that make it. Beam is American made real people building something that actually helps people right here at home. And every night it's the same story. You know, tossing, turning, staring at the ceiling, dragging through the next day. But now with a dream, I sleep through the night, wake up ready for the day. Dream is made with a powerful blend of all natural ingredients. Reishi, magnesium, L theanine, apigenin and melatonin. And spring is here, summer's right around the corner. And this is the season to show up strong. So do it with something made by Americans for Americans. Do it with Dream. Go to shop beam.com scroll and use code scroll to get my exclusive offer for up to 40% off Beam's dream Powder. So with my discount Code scroll you can get their best selling dream powder for just $39. And if you've been meaning to fix your sleep, this is the time it tastes great. Get Dream their best selling sleep powder for up to 40% off. And put your, put your phones on. Do not disturb. The show starts now. You know, Californians, people who live there, you know, it's, it was a once great state, a beautiful state. You got the beaches and everything. I mean it could be great. We need to make California great again. So the people that live there are just like, help us, you know, we're. We're living in squalor, especially in the cities like the la. Those areas stepping over human feces, needles, garbage, afraid to walk downtown, horrified by the headlines of skid row, crackheads testing their drugs on dogs, houses burning down to the ground they can't rebuild. Insurance was canceled, and Erwana selling a smoothie for $22. And then that's their reality. And Mayor Bass is like, best I can do for you is veneers for crackheads. Watch how many people who are unhoused that you meet have no teeth at all. They don't have teeth. Why? Because meth rots your teeth. You can't succeed without teeth. So there needs to be comprehensive health care provided to people. You can't succeed without teeth. You also can't succeed if you're on meth. I think she's missing, like, a key part of why these people cannot succeed. So Karen Bass, she teamed up with a nonprofit called Homeless Not Toothless. Yes. And I went to their website and listen. It's a good. They're doing good work. They're trying to do good work. These dentists are trying to get people much needed dental work. And people, you know, certain people can't afford it. And now, you know, Karen Bass is teaming up with them because they are saying that homeless meth heads can't get jobs because I don't know. Anyway, homeless, not toothless. You know, I don't know if they have figured this out, though, but we've stopped calling them. We. I mean, the woke left. They have stopped calling homeless people homeless. They are unhoused. So they're going to have to rename this, this nonprofit to Unhoused and unto instead of homeless and Toothless, which does sound better, but they. They've got to keep up with the woke times, if you will. So let me get this straight. Californians must pay out of their hard earned money. That doesn't go very far these days anyway, for homeless people to get new teeth. And on their website, it says that they've given out $11 million in pro bono services. They've served 135,000 patients, and they've been doing so for the last three decades. They also serve veterans, you know, of course, the unhoused survivors of domestic violence, foster youth, unhoused LGBTQ youth, and uninsured elderly, which is all very nice, and I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the charity. Certainly veterans should be taken care of. Why unhoused LGBTQ youth need new teeth. I'm not sure, but certainly they are. They are part of the needy, and they need new teeth.

[Co-host or Guest]

Where did their teeth go?

[Hayley Carania]

I don't know. I don't know. Are they all on meth? Like, I don't really. I don't. I don't get it. But anyway, LGBTQ youth certainly need free teeth. But Karen Bass is using this charity, of course, as a way to compel voters to sign on to this comprehensive health care for homeless people, or, I'm sorry, unhoused people. And the thing that's ironic is that Democrat voters, they want free health care. They like free health care. They hear comprehensive health care, and they're like, sign me up. But the thing is, they vote for this kind of thing, but they're never the recipients of the free health care. The Democrat voters never get the free health care. It goes to the homeless people. It goes to migrants. They're just footing the bill. But then they keep voting for it, knowing that, like, they're never going to get it. It's kind of the definition of. What do they call it? The definition of being stupid is like, doing something over and over again and, like.

[Co-host or Guest]

Insanity.

[Hayley Carania]

Insanity, yes. Yeah. The definition of insanity is, like, doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. So they're just signing on to these policies, and they're paying for it, but, like, everyone else is reaping the benefits, not them. And let me just say, it hasn't gone very well for them in California. They're, like, billions of dollars in debt, and their health care system is collapsing because they can't afford to give migrants and homeless people free health care. But they're going to try. They sure are going to try.

[Co-host or Guest]

I have a quick question that you might not know the answer to are, do they have a special dentist that these people are going to, or is it, like, me at my dentist? No, in walks, like, okay, cool, cool.

[Hayley Carania]

This is like. Or there were. Well, actually, I don't know. So. So with homeless and toothless or whatever it's called. Hopeful homeless, not toothless, There is a dentist that does this pro bono work. So he's done the. The charity work, and this is, you know, out of his pocket. And, you know, he probably gets paid through some other, you know, donations and stuff. But, yeah, anyway, that is separate from what Karen Bass is doing. Karen Bass wants comprehensive health care. She's, like, modeling. She wants to. What this one dentist is doing for his charity. She wants to model the entire state of California after. And certainly la. There's way too many people, like, anything that the Democrats say it sounds good. It doesn't work. Like, you try to implement it. It's like, oh, wait, we're going to go broke real quick doing this. And this is what they're focused on. You know, Karen Bass says that these people can't possibly start a new life with ugly teeth, which is true. But they also can't start a new life while they're still living in a tent city among all the feces and needles. Like, there are things that we need to do first before we get them free teeth.

[Co-host or Guest]

I think we start with the teeth. You know, everybody's just smiling, having a good time.

[Hayley Carania]

Look good, feel good, look good, feel good. And honestly, there is. I hate to say this, there is a little truth to the look good, feel good thing. You can't go into a job interview if you stink. You can't go into a job interview if you're wearing. You got holes in your shirt and your teeth are rotting. But again, that's not the problem. The problem is that they are on meth and living on the street. So, like, you know, the teeth just. They've got to come last. And I'm. And if this dentist wants to give people free teeth, you know, godspeed. But we certainly don't need to apply this to the entire state of California or the entire city of L. A. Way too many homeless people. So Californians will be paying out the wazoo for meth heads to get veneers so that they can ruin them with more meth. And there are things, you know, there are things that California does that I just. I think about this and I'm. I'm just a little confused. Like, you do this press conference and you're. You're shedding light on this, and it almost. You have to be delusional to not realize that this sheds on this, sheds light on the fact that there's still a huge problem that you haven't fixed. So Karen Bass is like, I can't fix the homeless crisis, but I can get these people new pearly whites. You know, like, she's like, my hands are tied. I can't fix. I can't get them homes. Like, I can't get them help, but I can get them teeth.

[Co-host or Guest]

You look. But you also look at other states that do these really amazing outreaches where they do help clean up the homeless, like, get them haircuts and, you know, a fresh pair of clothes and, you know, set. Set them up for success. It just feels like there's so many other. Like you said, other Problems that being like, oh, we got them. You know, this small thing is not.

[Hayley Carania]

And God bless those charities. Like, there are charities that work with homeless veterans to get them a suit so that they can go to their job interviews and things like that. God bless these people. But then you involve the government and all of a sudden it's like, I don't really know if this is going to go so well.

[Co-host or Guest]

Not my first business partner pick.

[Hayley Carania]

Yeah, sure. Because, you know, these people got to get sober and they can't get jobs because they likely are not sober and they have a criminal record. These are things that, you know, when you do get hired, they check these things. And, you know, I would ask, has Karen Bass done anything to help these people get jobs? Or is this just something that she can put on her resume as she's running for L. A. Mayor again to keep her seat? Like, hey, look at this good thing that I've done. It's sort of like a puff piece. Like, look how good of a person I am. I'm working with this charity. And you know, never mind the fact that we've got into this mess, like, never. Don't ask me why there are so many meth heads on the street that need teeth. Don't ask her those questions. That's. That's hard. Anyway, there are a ton of jobs, by the way, that you can do. You could work from home with no teeth. I. But here's the thing. I think these homeless people, they don't have a want or a drive to not be homeless.

[Co-host or Guest]

Yeah, I mean, totally.

[Hayley Carania]

Especially if they're drug addicted.

[Co-host or Guest]

Like, it's just such a tough situation because it's like so many other factors.

[Hayley Carania]

Yeah, but this makes total sense when you think of how California Democrats have a penchant for, like, lighting money on fire. This is just like, what they do best is spending money on unnecessary shit. And it's the perfect recipe for fraud, by the way, because how many California taxpayers give a rip about homeless people's teeth? Like, let's be honest with ourselves. Like, if. If someone asks you, do you care about homeless people's teeth? You say, yes, of course. But then you think about it. Have you ever thought about this in your life? No. You say yes because you want to sound like a good person. And if you ask most California taxpay, even the bleeding heart liberals, have they ever thought about a homeless person's teeth in their lives? No. Unless they're being robbed and held at gunpoint and they. They get a whiff of the person's Breath. That's the only, that's the only time they've ever thought about a homeless person's teeth. So I don't know if, if the government spent this money getting new teeth for them, would they even, would the California taxpayers or even know, would you be able to check in on these people? Would you? You know, it's just stupid.

[Co-host or Guest]

What if we took the money that we were going to spend on homeless people's teeth and gave it to iPads that we gave to inmates? Do you think that would work?

[Hayley Carania]

I do and we're going to get into that in just a second. I think that because I looked up like how much veneers cost, how much it costs to get veneers, which it could be very expensive, but depending on what kind you get, like you can get a lesser, like a lower end composite bonding type thing and it's, you know, $250 per tooth. That's a lot of money by the way, to spend on a crackhead.

[Co-host or Guest]

I think you need.

[Hayley Carania]

Sorry, sorry. It's a lot of money to spend on a crackhead. If you spend higher end, you can spend to 2500 per tooth, which is a crazy amount of money. But that's like, you know, L A prices. I'm assuming dental work so expensive. It's very expensive. And if I had to guess, this is California Democrat math I think, and I don't know this to be true, but I'm just going to guess. They'll say that it costs $20,000 per tooth. Like they'll, they'll go to the higher end and then they'll probably give the teeth the composite bonding like the $250 per tooth and then the, the where the rest of the money goes, we'll never know it. Like this is going to be a money laundering type situation. But yes, to your point about taxpayer funded tablets, California Governor Gavin Newsom has spent $189 million to overhaul the state's prison system. And as part of that prison system they did away with death row. They, they're not doing that anymore. So anyone that was on death row, they've dispersed out throughout the prison system. And most importantly, they've given inmates digital tablets so that they can access the Internet and, and communicate with friends and family. What could go wrong? What could go wrong? We're going to talk about it. So Gavin Newsome delivers porn to death row inmates at taxpayer expense. This is what goes wrong. And I just, this is their reasoning behind this. Not for the porn, but to give the inmates iPads Essentially this is what they said to achieve digital equity for justice impacted individuals. Justice impacted. As if it isn't the consequences of their own actions. You know, it's a funny way of saying we're wasting money on criminals. And it's also funny because speaking of digital equity, I don't have a taxpayer funded tablet.

[Co-host or Guest]

The same thing happened in Chicago where they bought all the high school kids tablets and then they never got any of those tablets back at the end of the year and they were used for nefarious. They would find them in these raids and stuff. It's just like nobody puts two and two together.

[Hayley Carania]

No. And it's just a waste of money. It's a waste of taxpayer money. But anyway, I mean you're also in, in order to have this thing work, you have to expect the best and, and not expect the worst out of literal criminals, like people who are sitting in jail. It's like, do we think that these people are going to use this? No, of course not. But here's the thing that pisses me off about this digital equity thing. Like if I want a tablet, I have to buy it myself. I have to go to work and I have to save the money and I have to buy it myself. If you're a criminal though, like if I live in California, I could go commit a crime, go sit in a jail cell, get a free tablet. Easy, much easier. It's much easier to commit a crime, get caught, sit in jail and get a free tablet. You don't have to work for anything. They, they literally incentivize bad behavior in these Democrat states and California chief among them, of course. But this is just another way that blue states coddle criminals. They make up stuff to spend money on and they turn a blind eye to the real problems and let them fester. So according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, they said this is according to them, these, this is according to the tablet people, the people that thought that the tablets were a good idea. These are quote, tightly controlled educational tools that provided inmates with access to the Bible, education and re entry resources that actually reduce crime. So it actually, if you think about it, it actually reduces crime. If you give criminals free tablets, it's going to reduce crime. So if you can believe it, the inmates weren't just using the tablets to educate themselves or get acquainted with Jesus. They were actually sexting with people and watching porn, which I'm sure California sees nothing wrong with. So let's read this quote. We contacted dozens of death row inmates who told us that Prisoners in the state system use their devices to watch pornography and have explicit sexual conversations. Some prisoners use their tablets to groom minors. Awesome. Again, awesome. Living in California must be so awesome, right? You do it for the weather and the beaches. It's so awesome. And then you live amongst retards that run you anyway. The state has claimed to regulate explicit content and the inmates told that these, these journalists here, that users can easily evade detection. So if the inmates want to use these iPads for bad, easy to do that again, these are criminals. Criminals are going to criminal. This is why we don't give up guns. This is why, you know, everything that these people are in jail for is already illegal, isn't it? And then they don't care too much about following the laws. So you give them, you know, this iPad, they're going to, they're going to commit crimes on it. And you know, this is disheartening to know that these people can be thrown behind bars and they're still doing harm to children. Like, it is amazing to think how stupid you have to be to give these inmates like a sort of like an olive branch. Like, oh, you're in jail for maybe abusing children, here's a tablet. And then they go and do the same stuff. Inmates should have access to books and no, no access to the outside world aside from phone calls and visits. Because if you're in prison grooming minors still, you obviously cannot be trusted with a laptop or a tablet or any anything. And this is exactly why I say there's no rehabilitation for these freaks. Freaks are going to freak. So they go to jail and they're up to the same stuff. So then they interviewed a serial rapist murderer and he said that he used one of these taxpayer funded tablets. And inmates will FaceTime with someone on the outside. They put porn on their computer or TV and then they watch it together. Thank you, Gavin Newsom. We really needed this. Californians needed this. So it's not that they can really access. Well, I don't know, they have access to the Internet, so I don't really understand that. But essentially they're facetiming someone at home, a friend, and then they watch porn together, which is super gay. But anyway, this next story is super infuriating because the people who are supposed to be protecting children are failing. And this brings me to Coxmill High School in Concord, North Carolina. They're making headlines for all the wrong reasons. And their principal at the time didn't want to listen to the complaints of female students of a transgender in their bathrooms making them feel uncomfortable because they that would be getting too political. So listen to these girls tearful please and help me figure out why someone who works with children wouldn't want to fight for the rights of these girls. Listen.

[Student Speaker 1]

Many of my peers and I feel uncomfortable using facilities designed for women and women alone as he has different reproductive parts than we do. Another peer of mine who is on a sports team say that during scheduled spring workouts for her sport she was in the locker room changing when she noticed him watching her and the other girls dress and under. She stated that this made her feel extremely uncomfortable and that she did not feel safe or respected in that environment. She then reported the situation to her coach and athletic director who then directed her to speak about this issue with the principal. When she then brought the concern about her safety and uncomfortability to him, he stated that the matter was too political to address and that any action might be interpreted the wrong way. Our school is supposed to make every student safe, but we get ostracized when we discuss this with adults who are supposed to ensure the safety and comfortability at school. School Personally, I try to avoid the restrooms at all costs, but I do use these facilities at times when I really have to. I as well as others do not feel comfortable when an individual of the opposite gender is allowed and authorized to use our facilities. Tonight I am asking the school board what they plan to ensure the comfortability and privacy of my fellow students and I during the bathroom and locker room changes. Thank you for your time and open mindedness.

[Hayley Carania]

This next girl. I mean it's just amazing that these girls have the bravery to get up here and it's unfortunate that they have to then tell their stories in front of a bunch of adults that clearly don't give a rip about them. And here's another girl and this is a tearful plea. Listen, I'm a 15 year old student

[Student Speaker 2]

at Mount Pleasant High School and today I'm here because I care about my school. But more importantly, I'm here right now because students like me don't feel safe in spaces where privacy should be respected. There's been situations where a biological male has been in the women's restroom. It was reported, it was addressed and yet nothing that is unacceptable. When students speak up about safety and nothing happens, you send a message that we don't matter. You send a message that girls are accept are expected to stay quiet, stay uncomfortable and deal with the situation by themselves. That is not leadership, that's failure. I've had countless students Parents and community members thank me for standing up because they're too afraid to do it themselves. Think about that for a moment. They're too afraid to speak up because they're scared to be ignored, mocked, or labeled for saying something. Fathers should not have to worry whether their daughters feel unsafe in schools. Mothers should never have to wonder whether the people they elected to protect their students are going to dismiss them. If this board refuses to listen before something serious happens, the responsibility will fall on y', all, all the ones who ignored all warnings.

[Hayley Carania]

It's just so heartbreaking to hear her break down and cry. And she's in front of all of these adults. Like, what, are there, 10 adults on this school board? And they're just kind of staring at her while she's crying, and it just doesn't seem like there's any ounce of remorse on their faces. They don't seem like they care. And clearly they don't care because these girls were told that, you know, there was, like, nothing that could be done. So the name of the principal is Chris Myers, and he's no longer the principal, but he told these girls that if they feel uncomfortable with a transgender in the bathroom, they can go somewhere else. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? Girls in the bathroom feel uncomfortable going to the girl's bathroom. They can go somewhere else. Why don't you tell the transgender to go somewhere else, like the bathroom that matches their biological sex? Easy. We've been doing this the same way for all of time. It's never been a problem until, like, 2016, when the world went absolutely nuts, and we just, like, let these people do whatever the hell they want, and women have to take the backseat every time. It's so, so disheartening. And the majority of people bend to this minuscule portion of society that's mentally ill. Why does anyone have to live in their fantasy world? And why are people so quick to make sure that they are comfortable like the transgenders are comfortable, while they're trying to get everyone else to live in their alternate reality? And here's the problem. The teachers tell the girls to go find another bathroom if they're uncomfortable because they know that the trans student is going to cry discrimination. Well, it's time to stop underestimating women and girls, because they've put up with this nonsense for too long, and now they're fighting back. So these girls have teamed up with America first legal to to file a complaint arguing that Title 9 has been violated. And that's what got the school to tell the principal to hit the road. So now the principal is no longer the principal. But the scary part about this is that the girls in this school started sounding the alarm in 2024. But because it was under the Biden administration, the school deferred to their interpretation of Title 9, the Biden administrations, which meant that trans people couldn't be discriminated against. So again, under the Biden administration and under the Democrats, trans people are above women, men above women, and women need to shut up and just take a back seat to these trans people who barge into their spaces. And then we have another similar story. This time, it's happening in Loudoun County, Virginia. Who could have guessed? Do you all remember everything that happened in Loudoun County, Virginia? Because if you don't remember, let's back things up. Back in 2021, there was a transgender student, biologically male, wearing skirts and demanding access to the girl's bathroom. Of course, the school complies. You want. You're a boy. You want to go into the girl's bathroom. Sure. No questions asked. So guess what happens when he's allowed into the girl's bathroom. Well, he sexually assaults a young girl in there. So after that, they transferred the trans student to a different school in the same district. I'm actually shocked that they didn't tell the girl to go find a new school district. Probably her parents were threatening to sue them, but they moved the transgender abuser to a different school in the same district. And then five months later, he reoffended. And if you think about it, because the first time, it happened in May, and then he reoffended in October, they weren't even in school, probably June, July, August. So it's, like, right back at it. Like, school's out for summer. Who knows what this guy's doing on summer vacation, assaulting women in other restrooms. And he's back in school, and it's like, second month of school, he's back assaulting women. Absolutely ridiculous. So he gets transferred to the other school, does it again. That student was convicted in juvenile court of sexual assault and sodomy charges on both incidents. But he was just sentenced to probation and treatment and released when he turned 18. And he did not have to be registered as a sex offender. So where is this transgender student now? I don't know, but they're 18 years old, and I'm sure they are still getting access, gaining access to other women's bathrooms, because this is in Virginia. So now the school is at fault for this because they passed policy 8040 saying that students can use whatever bathroom they frickin feel like. And that was the school board's policy. So one of the victim's fathers at the time was arrested at a school board meeting. You probably remember this, there's videos of it. And he made that point very clear that this was the school's fault because they allowed for this to happen. And this is when the Biden administration, Attorney General Merrick Garland, sent out a memo calling concerned parents domestic terrorists. So the concerned parents are the real problem here. Hilarious. Then in 2025, at Stonebridge High School, also in Loudoun County, Virginia, the roles were reversed. A female identifying as a male and entered the boys locker room. And a group of boys reported feeling uncomfortable with that because she was filming them while they were in the locker room. And the school actually investigated the boys for wrongdoing. Not the transgender, of course, because they can do no wrong. And accused the boys of violating, violating Title 9 and harassing the transgender student. And some of those boys face suspension. So then you can imagine that the parents were absolutely rip shit. Then a legal fight ensued and the school ended up settling with some of the boys families. So now fast forward to this year and this stuff is still going on in the same school district. This now is at Freedom High School, another transgender student. Is anyone wondering what's in the water in Loudoun County, Virginia? Why are all these kids transgender? And I'm joking when I say what's in the water? Obviously it's this ideology that the school system is promoting and they're bringing up all these kids and raising this kids in this system. Of course, if you tell kids, oh, this is a safe space for transgenders, all these kids are going to do it. They're going to hop on this trend. They think it's trendy and cool and you know, they're not fitting in. And then, oh my gosh, you tell a kid that's not fitting in in school that he could just become a woman and then get all of these things. He gets everything he wants in life. It's like, sure, of course, it's easy to manipulate these people. They're vulnerable. So another transgender student again filming over 40 boys under the bathroom stalls. So is this a boy that's maybe gay and identifying as a woman to go into the locker room and assault boys. Now, apparently this has been happening for over three years and the school reportedly knew about some of these complaints and did nothing. And if you need another reason to be concerned with Loudoun, Loudoun County Public School District, they hired a Transgender teacher that was plotting a shooting spree because this is what they do. A 19 year old trans, non licensed substitute teacher was arrested for allegedly posting a detailed online threat of a school shooting with a kill list. He had a kill list. So this one was at John Champ High School in Stone Ridge, Virginia. Again, this is the school's fault. They're hiring these people, they're telling them that it's a safe space for them. And when you tell trans people that this is a safe space, you know, they really let their freak flag fly. And because they're all messed up in the head, then, you know, you give them access to other children, you give them access to other vulnerable children and you give them access to a school and this is what they're going to do. We, we've seen this uptick in transgender killings and shootings and it's, it's not a coincidence anymore. But like, I don't know how many incidences it's going to take for people in this school districts and people in blue states and cities to like realize you're, you're letting this problem fester and it's your fault anyway. This transgender, he, she, it, I have no idea what way it started, which way it's going. I have no idea. This transgender allegedly bragged about wanting to shoot people at school on online messages. This was on like an online platform, discord, something like that. And then someone saw those messages of him threatening or him, I'm calling it to him. I have no frickin clue. No idea. And 19 years old. I don't know how you, you get hired as a non licensed substitute teacher at 19 years old. I think maybe because you're transgender you get to do whatever you want in the school district. Maybe, I don't know. But thankfully law enforcement was tipped off and stepped in. And thank goodness these people are stupid enough to plan their crimes in chat rooms. So if it isn't a trans person abusing children sexually, then they're planning to murder children at school. It's obvious that they shouldn't be around children at all. And it's obvious that the school has an ongoing problem they refuse to to fix because they are woke beyond repair. This is what happens when you cave to the most mentally ill faction of society and bend to their every demand. They get to go into whatever bathrooms they want, get jobs despite being unlicensed. They are mentally ill with sick sexual fetishes. And that's what transgenderism is. There are men who think there are women that dress up like little girls, and they're women who think that they're boys. It is an impossibility. And yet the Democrat Party lets them think that they can change their biological sexual and encourages them to mutilate themselves. It's a human rights abuse. But the Democrat Party thinks that it's like the good thing and the right thing to do. And then they give them unfettered access to victims. And for a while there, we had Governor Glenn Youngkin in Virginia who was well aware of these issues, exposing them and getting involved politically. Now Virginians have Abigail Spanberger, who would sooner fight for the rights of the mentally ill trannies than she would for the girls who were crying and begging to be seen and heard. Just absolutely disgusting and sick. I hope Virginia gets well soon. We have to talk about AI, though. I. I want to turn to these AI stories because it really is getting to be disturbing for a lot of ways. And I think AI can be used for good. But then there's this slippery slope where maybe it could be used for bad. And we keep seeing that it's really. It's flawed, the technology is flawed. So this Tennessee grandmother spent five months in jail in Fargo, North Dakota because of botched AI facial recognition. Listen to her lawyer. Watch.

[Lawyer or Legal Expert]

As best I can tell, her face was selected by an AI program. And an officer reviewed her social media and deemed her a sufficient fit. And that caused an arrest warrant to be issued for her.

[News Reporter or Legal Commentator]

According to court documents, Fargo police were investigating a bank fraud case where someone had used a fake US Military ID to take out thousands of dollars between April and May of 2025. Lips attorney says it appears AI software that examined surveillance video flagged Lips as a possible suspect.

[Lawyer or Legal Expert]

It appeared that officers had information that Ms. Lips was from out of state and had no connection to the area. I haven't seen any information suggesting to officers that she was ever in the area or took part in these activities.

[News Reporter or Legal Commentator]

Arrest reports show Lips was taken into custody in North Dakota at the end of October, then finally released at the end of December.

[Lawyer or Legal Expert]

She had exculpatory evidence readily available and easily accessible. She was able to provide that to her attorney. I don't know the details as to why it took multiple months for that to reach the state, but it does appear that once the state received that information, they pretty quickly dismissed the charges and released her from custody.

[News Reporter or Legal Commentator]

Now lip's attorney, Eric Rice of Minnesota, says they're considering a civil rights lawsuit.

[Lawyer or Legal Expert]

I just want to highlight that this is a, you know, potentially very troubling circumstance. What we have here is a Person who had no connection to North Dakota, did not engage in any conduct that made her a criminal suspect. And merely because a computer, you know, selected her photo, among others, she was dragged halfway across the country and criminally charged.

[Hayley Carania]

This is one of the most shocking things I've seen in a while. You're telling me an innocent grandmother got her face? Her. It was facial recognition gone wrong. This AI, I guess the police department was using AI to identify, which is fine. Like, I think if you use AI to identify criminals, that's fine, but you got to make sure that it's the right person. You can't just throw innocent people in jail.

[Co-host or Guest]

She should be the new owner of North Dakota at this point.

[Hayley Carania]

Yeah. Seriously, she should choose who gets to be the next sheriff of North Dakota. She should be the mayor. Yeah. I mean, she doesn't even live in North Dakota. She lives in Tennessee.

[Co-host or Guest]

Five months.

[Hayley Carania]

Five months in jail before this could get figured out. Could you imagine sitting in jail for five months? I would be rip. Shit. I'd be screaming my head off in there. I like AI. And then it's like, okay, if you use AI, fine, use AI. But double check to make sure that you're not throwing someone. Like, you're innocent until proven guilty. So how can you be thrown in jail? Like, did they. How did they prove it?

[Co-host or Guest]

Yeah, so we went ahead and threw Meemaw on the. In the prison.

[Hayley Carania]

Poor Meemaw.

[Co-host or Guest]

You gonna check on it? Nah, I'm pretty sure we got her.

[Hayley Carania]

No, it's like, yeah, that. No, that looks right. So it's like, you didn't have any other evidence to tie her. And then she. You know, that lawyer said she had evidence. Like, she had alibi. She. She was in Tennessee. She had all this evidence that she wasn't where this crime happened. She had never been to North North Dakota. And then all of a sudden, it's like, you're being tried for a crime there. She's like, I've never been there. I have evidence. And they're like, no, no, no. We have. We have enough proof over here with our AI.

[Co-host or Guest]

And I'm sure you're aware there's not that much up there. Like, there's only a few town, like, well, that's probably.

[Hayley Carania]

They were probably like, we can't find this woman. It's close enough. Someone in the chat said, oh, hell, yeah, I would sue the pants off of them. Yeah. This woman has got one hell of a lawsuit on her hands, and I hope that she takes them to the cleaners, because this is Insane to go to jail for five months. You're five months for nothing. If I, If I ever got thrown in jail for something that I didn't do, I, first of all, I would be their worst nightmare. But I would go to the gym every day and get absolutely. I'm like, if I have to be in here for five months, let me just get absolutely ripped.

[Co-host or Guest]

Same wavelength. I was like, I'd be walking out of that place looking like Gucci mane,

[Hayley Carania]

just like ready to go, so ripped. And then I'd come out and beat everyone up. Beat everyone up. That put me there. Beat up the AI. That's the problem. You can't even, like, who are you going to sue? The AI company? The, you know, it's just like everyone suing everyone. And then I was on Newsmax last night with Carl Higby, and he brought up this story about Lowe's and Home Depot using AI technology to essentially track who goes in and out of their, their stores and in their parking lots. And basically it's going to be AI technology that's used by the stores. But then it's unclear if the store can then send that information to the law enforcement. I'm sure they can. Like, why wouldn't they be able to subpoena that? And people are saying, like, this is supposed to track consumer behaviors, and it's also supposed to track, like, if someone steals something, they can get their license plate or whatever, which I don't really know how different that is from security cameras. I guess maybe it's more in depth and clear. More clear than security cameras or cctv. But this is just like another slippery slope type thing where it's like, okay, if you're using this to make sure that people don't steal stuff, okay, but what if you start tracking this and what if this data starts getting hacked? And what if the technology gets into the wrong hands? Like, technology is always great until it isn't. And it's always like, my opinion on this is the same thing with Amazon, Alexa, Google Home. And I know that we have this right here and it's spying on us. I know, but it's like, if I can help it, I don't want to have all these other things spying on me. Same thing with Amazon, Alexa's ring cameras, Nest cameras. You know, the technology is good when it's good. When it's bad, it could be really bad. And what if our biggest adversaries hack into it and get into. It's just like, then they have access to our homes and where we're going. And, and even if they're just selling our data to sell us stuff, it's just like very invasive. And I don't know, it just. I'm concerned about this. And they. We're just being spied on at all times. And then we covered this on the show the other day. But in 2027, all new cars and Fords are going to have this AI technology where it's facial recognition reading your lips and the cars have a kill switch. So if the car wants to shut off and the car deems you unfit to drive for whatever reason, if you like slump down for a second, you're in traffic and you go, like, this car is going to shut off. I mean, there are so many ways that this can go south. And again, it just seems like this is getting away from us. Like these AI companies and even the government, like, they're signing off on these things and it's like, is this really what the people want? This isn't what I want.

[Co-host or Guest]

It's a no for me.

[Hayley Carania]

So it's got to be the AI companies, you know, buying influence in Congress.

[Co-host or Guest]

I mean, it's kind of, you think about like the use case. You don't, you don't. Nobody likes drunk drivers, right? Of course, if you're saying, I can solve this huge problem, you know, I feel like a lot of people will buy into it, right? But in doing so, how many other issues do you open up? I mean, it's just such a slippery slope of like the social credit system using AI.

[Hayley Carania]

And then I wonder too about the psychological damage that this is going to do to human beings when they're being watched a hundred percent of the time. It's like this Big Brother reality where will, I mean, people will be changed and like their brains will adapt to this. And then it's almost like we're gonna have these soulless bot type human beings walking around that are so afraid of being canceled and so afraid of being watched. And it's like everyone's gonna be on their best behavior at all times, which, oh, that's a good thing, right? Like, nobody's gonna steal because they could be watched or nobody's gonna do this because they could be watched. But no, I mean, it's just, I think it's going to be more damaging to at least like interpersonal communication. Like, how is it, how can you. If you have a bad day at work and you get into your car and you just like scream or you go home at the end of the day and you scream into your pillow. Like, that is going to be a thing of the past, people. No one's going to do anything that they wouldn't do on camera. And I think that that's really weird.

[Co-host or Guest]

Well, you look at historically, like Orwellian and Lowry, like these utopias that make. Where everything's supposed to be good. As humans, we are so flawed, it just isn't possible. And I think people overlook that factor quite often.

[Hayley Carania]

Yeah. And this is. You know, people in the chat were asking if we use AI, and I do I use AI. You know, I'll use Grok for something. We. They use Grok for graphics and things like that, or AI for graphics. And you use AI more than I do. You have bots that help you organize stuff?

[Co-host or Guest]

Yeah, pretty minimally, though. I. It's mostly. I use it more as a search engine to. And then we'll use it to confirm sources and, you know, create, like, rundowns of the show and stuff like that, just to save a little bit of time. But I am not relying on it to make major life decisions.

[Hayley Carania]

Right.

[Co-host or Guest]

Other than will my, like, TV look good where I want to put it in my living room, that's the biggest

[Hayley Carania]

decision I let it make, which is that's like a. Probably a healthy way to look at AI. I can use this again for good. I can use this to ask advice or whatever. But. But then when you have people that are unhealthy mentally using AI, this can go very south. And we're seeing this. You know, it's manifesting in a lot of negative ways where mentally ill people or vulnerable people are using ChatGPT or other AI companies and they're using these avatars and these bots as sort of a bounce board. And when I say bounce board, I mean. I mean it. Like, whatever you put into this bot, it's going to give you back some sort of affirmation. So if you are struggling mentally, it's going to tell you that you're right. If you want to be transgender, it's going to tell you to do that. Like, it's very complimentary and it's not. It's not a sounding board in, like, hey, let me ask for some unbiased advice. It is very, very biased. And this is an example of a. A young boy who ended up committing suicide. And I want to be delicate with how I cover this story because I feel very badly for this family, and I feel very badly that this boy was struggling mentally and took his own life. But this family then did an interview. Now, after the death of their son. And they are blaming AI because he used AI while he was struggling to give him advice. And the AI ended up giving him advice about what drugs to take that ultimately ended up killing him. Watch this. Do you hold responsible for Sam's death?

[Student Speaker 2]

Open AI

[News Reporter or Legal Commentator]

and the creators, the, the

[Hayley Carania]

people who made this, the people who bypassed safety guards and took away safety

[News Reporter or Legal Commentator]

nets from this version that Sam was using, that. Could have very easily been put in.

[Hayley Carania]

Again, I think that these AI platforms need to have safeguards. They're not perfect. And again, they're not giving you medical advice. And they say, they come right on. Say, like, please don't use this for medical advice. Don't use us for legal advice. Like, this is. This is not to be used as. Like, I think people think that it's AI so it's perfect and it's AI and it's flawless and it's going to give you the perfect answer. It is not. And it's built by humans and it's coded by human humans and we are flawed. The same way that you could reach out to a friend who can give you bad advice or a lawyer that could give you bad advice. Like, this is just, it's sort of a mixed bag. And I think people think because it's a technology, like it can do no wrong and whatever it says goes. And it must be better than going to a human. And it's just not the truth. So this young boy ended up. They. This. He committed suicide, which is so tragic and I, I feel so badly again. But he's asking AI about how to kill himself and all this stuff. You would think that there would be something in the platform that would maybe trigger like a, hey, if you need help, like here's a suicide hotline, here's the national whatever, call this number, whatever. And maybe those, maybe that prompt would help. Maybe it would just shield the company from being sued, I guess, or getting some of the blame. Like, maybe they could skirt some of the blame. Like, we did try to help. And I think that there's definitely things that the company should do, but we're ignoring the fact that AI isn't really the root cause of this suicide at all. Like, this was a child who was struggling for whatever reason, I don't know what. And I think his parents are very quick to blame this AI platform when in reality, I, I don't want to misspeak, but I think he was 18 or 19. At 18 or 19, I think you, you. He was asking chat GPT for advice about like Certain drugs. He knew that he could take drugs to kill himself. Like, he was old enough to know that this is a way that I could take myself out of this world. And this is so tragic. But he knew that it was going to kill him. And he was asking AI and the AI told him, like, yeah, you could take, you know, drink alcohol and take Xanax and take this. And like, the kid knew what he was doing. And I think there's an aspect to this where, yes, the company is at fault. The same way that a bartender can be held accountable for over serving someone and then they go kill someone. I think there is a level to that where, yes, you could place some blame, but it's also personal accountability. Like, he was clearly struggling mentally. The parents had no idea he died. And then the parents are going through these chat bot messages and they're realizing, oh, my son was struggling. We had no idea. We have a problem in this society if you, if your kid is struggling, your kid is suicidal, and you have no idea. You need to connect with your children in a way where, if your kids are holed up in their room and they're on their iPads or their tablets or their computers and they don't want to talk to you or whatever, like, what is going on with that family? Like, what is going on with their relationship? Where this kid would rather go to his very safe AI chatbot instead of the people in his life who clearly care very much for him. So someone in the chat just said she's looking to sue open AI maybe. And I think it's also very easy to. And I'm not saying that the parents are fully to blame either, but I think it's very easy when you're grieving. You want to find a scapegoat, and it's, It's a very easy scapegoat. Someone also just said the kid could just Google it. Like, this information is, is anywhere. But I, I think with Google, and maybe not with now with Google Gemini, but before, when you Google something, you know, articles would come up. You'd still have to, like, make your own assumptions. AI is really telling you what to think in a way that Google used to. Not like, it's. It's different than a search engine when you're using it as like a sort of friend. It. It's. It's much more personal, even though it's not personal.

[Co-host or Guest]

No doubt. And just a quick plug, like, for anybody who's out there struggling, the suicide and like Crisis hotline is 988. It's a great resource. And you know, these chatbots, like they do become almost friends and family. And you just have to be really careful because like you said, they're not omnipotent and gotta watch, watch out.

[Hayley Carania]

Yeah, absolutely. And AI is now being used in the workplace place in ways that it has never been used before. And companies are using AI to, you basically do HR work for them and to sift through resumes. And let me just say I have had to sift through resumes in my day and because I was in charge of interns at Fox and things like that. And it's not fun, it's very tedious to go through all these, you know, resumes and it's definitely easy to go put these, hey, can you sift through these 400 interview resumes and click the ones that are a best fit? And then you just go on based on AI. But I didn't want to do that. These are human beings. And again, you have to work with a human being. So wouldn't it be best if a human being that is actually going to work with this other human being decides if this person is a good fit or not and then what, what if this person, like how many times have you, you maybe hired someone that, hey, they didn't have the right experience. But I really like their drive and I really like the way that they answered this question or I really like the way that they, you know, they spoke up or they showed up and they were persevering like there are different aspects to a human being aside from just their 2D resume. And AI is never going to get that. They're never going to get the full picture of who this employee could really be and how they would fit in in a work environment. So this HR company called Workday is now facing a collective action lawsuit based on the claims that I screened applicants and discriminated against candidates 40 years of age or older. And again, when you ask an AI to screen these things and hey, what would be a good fit for this company? Like the AI is deciding that, so the AI is deciding that. Or did someone at the company tell the AI to sift through and get rid of old, the older people, older

[Co-host or Guest]

applicants is the million dollar.

[Hayley Carania]

So that's the question. And that's why this guy, Derek Mobley, he filed this employment discrimination lawsuits saying that their algorithm based applicant screening system discriminated against him and other applicants based on age, race and disability. And Workday is saying, no, that's not true. This lawsuit has no merit. Workday's AI recruiting tools don't make hiring decisions. Our customers maintain full control and human oversight of their hiring process. But if AI is sifting through the resumes and deciding, hey, these are the ones that you should look at, then that's not really true.

[Co-host or Guest]

I'm a grade A workday hater.

[Hayley Carania]

I hated work day. I had to use Workday. I hated it. We used workday at Fox. Oh my gosh. Yeah, it's just. Yeah, nothing worse than workday. Did you have to use okta to like sign into the two factor identification

[Co-host or Guest]

and no, we were, we were a Microsoft company. So I would get caught in the Microsoft sign in loop and have to walk down to tech and beg, yeah,

[Hayley Carania]

like, please let me into my laptop, please, I just want to work. I just want to.

[Co-host or Guest]

Please.

[Hayley Carania]

I just. Help me, I'm poor. Help me, I'm poor. I just want my paycheck. Yeah. So all these companies stink and now they're using AI, so they're going to get worse. And I think it's just easy to blame, like the companies can now just blame the AI technology. Like, oh, well, it wasn't us discriminating, it was the AI. Sorry, but again, like there has to be human oversight here. The same way with that grandma that got arrested for no reason. It's like, okay, use AI if you want. And maybe the facial recognition was close, but you didn't have enough to get her and then you threw her in jail anyway. Like, have the AI go through it if you want, but then a human does have to go through and check these things. And humans have biases too, but they also know that they can't act on them in the professional setting. Like an AI doesn't really know that

[Co-host or Guest]

unless you work at JP Morgan.

[Hayley Carania]

Exactly. So I don't know. And then again, like the AIs learn from humans, so the AI is probably just as biased as humans would be. And yeah, it's just. So I was reading through this and it's interesting because the way that the AI can sift through resumes is that it flags certain words that people use in their resumes. And they do say that because companies use AI now if you are applying for a job and it says like, we're looking for a strong leader. It's like, then you like put strong leader and like put it into your cover letter. So it's like, oh, like she's a perfect fit.

[Co-host or Guest]

You know, the AI loop. The, the person trying to get hired using AI to read the job description and write the perfect yes. Application And AI reading the perfect application going, wow, he's the perfect person.

[Hayley Carania]

He's perfect. We did it. The AI. Yeah, it's just. Yeah, it's like a vicious cycle. So anyway, it's. They're saying that these people suing, saying that this can actually be like a race or socioeconomic type discrimination, certain types of people, which is. I actually find this racist and I find this not to be true. But they say that certain people will have things like club president, leader, captain in their resumes. And they're saying that people of a certain socioeconomic status would not have those things. Come on now. Also, anyone could just put those words in their resume.

[Co-host or Guest]

I was going to say, I've seen some pretty wild resumes where they're president of.

[Hayley Carania]

Like, in a world where you can lie on your resume, like, how could this possibly. Like, people of a lower socioeconomic class don't lie. Like, give me a freaking break.

[Co-host or Guest]

I was president of my crochet company that I ran for my grandma.

[Hayley Carania]

Oh, my goodness. Anyway, more HR departments at companies are using AI now, not just to sift through resumes, but to actually interview applicants and watch how this one went. Perfectly said. Well said. Well said. You got the job. Yeah. So this is a man, you know, and this is the. This is the thing about at home interviews. It's like you put on your shirt and your tie and you're sitting in your room and then you have this AI woman that's absolutely glitching on camera attempting to ask you questions, and you're like, is this where I'm at? Like, this has to be a moment for this man where he's like, am I, Am I really? Am I here right now? Like, someone pinch me. Because this AI bot that can't even figure it out is going to decide whether or not I get into a. A human interview next round.

[Co-host or Guest]

Applying for jobs and interviewing is probably like the worst.

[Hayley Carania]

It's a demoralizing process.

[Lawyer or Legal Expert]

It is the worst.

[Hayley Carania]

Yeah.

[Co-host or Guest]

If I have an AI bot crashing out on me, I. This poor guy, I would just.

[Hayley Carania]

I would end it and email the company and say, hi, thank you so much for your consideration. You guys are morons. Bye. Like, I'm not working for you. You can't even have the decency to find a human being to interview me. And you think that this bot that's crashing out can decide whether or not I'm good enough to actually meet with you? Like, F you. I'd be so mad. It is so, like, rude. It's so rude.

[Co-host or Guest]

That's the perfect word. Rude.

[Hayley Carania]

It's so rude. And then here's another. This is how this goes wrong again. So this person is on an interview, except there are two AI bots in the chat room and they just start interviewing each other. Watch.

[Co-host or Guest]

40%.

[Hayley Carania]

Am I not the one that's impressive. What coding languages are you most comfortable with? I'm proficient in Python, JavaScript.

[Co-host or Guest]

Oh, come on.

[Hayley Carania]

Final questions for us.

[Co-host or Guest]

No, thanks.

[Hayley Carania]

You will start on Monday. Huh?

[Co-host or Guest]

No, I will start on Monday.

[Hayley Carania]

Wait, what? Thank you for interviewing with us today.

[Co-host or Guest]

Thank you for coming to this interview.

[Hayley Carania]

We appreciate your interest in our company.

[Co-host or Guest]

We appreciate you taking the time to meet with us. What is going on?

[Hayley Carania]

We'll be in touch about next steps. We'll let you know our decision. Accepted. Welcome to the team. The guy's voice, we're a family here. He's like, what is happening? This AI accepted this job offer on my behalf. He didn't even say anything. Like, he's like third wheeling on this AI first interview date. It's insane. Like, what have we. What have we gotten to in this world? And now you. You had a video for me about a guy. This is a human that messed up on his job interview.

[Co-host or Guest]

Here we go.

[Job Interviewee]

Just bombed the job interview. I knew the question was coming. They always ask it, what's your biggest weakness? I blacked out. Brain went up. Didn't say. All delegation have a problem delegating. Because I want to make sure that it gets done right. Nothing like that. Nothing standard. Know what I said? Oreos. I said Oreos were my biggest weakness. I was like, I'll eat them until the milk's gone. However much milk's in my cup, I'll eat oreos. Could be two, could be 12.

[Hayley Carania]

It could never be two. Who's ever eaten two Oreos?

[Co-host or Guest]

The serving size?

[Job Interviewee]

Your boy's still looking for a job.

[Hayley Carania]

I actually think that the Oreo serving size is 3. 3. I think it's 3 cookies.

[Co-host or Guest]

You want to bet a case of Oreos on this?

[Hayley Carania]

Yes. I love Oreos. Oreos are some of my favorite foods and it is a weakness for me as well. So this, this, this video spoke to me. So thank you for, for grabbing that. But this would not keep me from hiring someone. I would actually think that they're very wholesome and they have a good personality and it's, it's self deprecating and it's cute. And I'd be like, okay, I want to work with this person rather than, you know, AI some AI generated answer. So I like it. What Are. We'll just end on this note. But Oreos and Cheez Its are my weaknesses. What are your weakness? And everyone in the chat can let me know their weakness.

[Student Speaker 1]

Yeah.

[Hayley Carania]

Someone in the chat said I sort of liked the Oreos answer. Three cookies. I knew it.

[Co-host or Guest]

Timeout. Timeout.

[Hayley Carania]

It says a standard serving size for or original Oreo Cookies is 3 cookies, 160 calories. I fumbled.

[Co-host or Guest]

I eat double stuff. Yeah.

[Hayley Carania]

Oh, is that some variation? Oreo thin cookies may have different serving sizes. Two cookies or one.

[Lawyer or Legal Expert]

Andrew's culture cultured and only eats.

[Hayley Carania]

Oh, double stick stuff. And I, I, you know what? I hate that Double stuff has one F in it. Pull that back up. Double stuff one F. This is so dumb. Like, this, I feel like is a, A Mandela effect. I know it's a Mandela effect.

[Co-host or Guest]

I'm. Be honest. I was ready to, like, school you in Oreo content. And I'm getting cooked right now.

[Hayley Carania]

There's one F3.3 cookies in a serving size for the standard. And double stuff has one F, which is just. I don't know if people are trying to be, like, cutesy, but I, you know, that's just not how you spell. So I hate. I have been confronted by far too many Double stuff packaging to get that wrong. I could eat an entire sleeve of Oreos and still be hungry and want more.

[Co-host or Guest]

If it enters my home, it's gone the day I buy it. Yes, a Publix Bogo hates to see me coming.

[Hayley Carania]

And I, when I go to Publix, I, I, I stay on the outside ring of the grocery store. This is where you get the healthy stuff for the most part. And all the package processed stuff is usually in the middle. I don't even look on those inner aisles. I can't. I can't. Because I love Oreos. I love Cheez Its. Can't go near them because I will abuse it. Like, if I let myself buy it and they're in my apartment, they will be gone. I'll eat the entire box. And I'll tell myself, I'll do the thing where I'm like, okay, I'm only gonna need half the box. And then like, five minutes later, I'm

[Co-host or Guest]

like, do you remember the. The Tabasco Cheez Its back in the day?

[Hayley Carania]

Yes.

[Co-host or Guest]

That's like a summertime.

[Hayley Carania]

My favorite Cheez Its are the extra toasty ones that they have now. They're like, a little extra crispy. They leave them in the oven a little longer.

[Co-host or Guest]

Justin is just dog in the Cheez it game.

[Hayley Carania]

He doesn't like Cheez. Its okay. Uncultured swine. We're not. Oh, I. I love Cheez. Its all right, well, now I'm hungry, so I'm going to go eat lunch. And thank you for scrolling along with me. We're going to do a super scroll tomorrow, so stay tuned for that. Of course, you can follow me on social media in the meantime, and I'll see you tomorrow.

[Student Speaker 2]

Bye.

[Hayley Carania]

Sa.