No Filter With Zack Peter — Episode Summary
Episode: Clinton Depositions Pop-Off, Nancy Guthrie Reporter Affair Rumor, & $10M Defamation TikTok Judgement
Date: March 4, 2026
Host: Zack Peter
Overview
This lively episode dishes out the latest reality TV and true crime news: from Hillary and Bill Clinton’s “pop-off” depositions and wild theories in the Nancy Guthrie investigation, to a $10M defamation verdict against a notorious TikTok psychic. Zack brings his characteristic humor and candor to set the record straight on recent drama, shut down critics, recap major headlines, and engage his devoted audience.
Key Discussion Points
1. $10 Million TikTok Defamation Judgment
[12:06–28:54]
-
Incident Background:
Zack addresses a late-night “call-out” from Fox 10 Phoenix anchor, Ella McNamara (@mmacfox10), accusing both Zack and journalist Ashley Banfield of irresponsibly speculating about the Nancy Guthrie case. The anchor cited the $10M defamation ruling against TikTok psychic Ashley Gillard as a warning to others. -
Breakdown of the Defamation Case:
- The Accusations: Gillard falsely accused Idaho professor Rebecca Schofield of orchestrating the infamous Idaho 4 murders, claiming psychic intuition and tarot readings as her “evidence.”
- Rebecca Schofield’s Legal Response: Multiple cease-and-desist orders were ignored; Gillard kept producing videos (over 100).
- Court Proceedings: Gillard represented herself (which Zack called “rookie mistake. Always trust an attorney. You are a psychic on TikTok… Get a [explicit] lawyer, you idiot.” - [21:36]).
- Outcome: Judge found Gillard’s statements defamatory; jury awarded $10M in punitive and compensatory damages.
-
Zack’s Defense of Himself and Ashley Banfield:
- Unlike Gillard, Zack and Banfield provided commentary and speculation with clear disclaimers, relying on public information and changing opinions as new facts come out.
- Notable quote:
“I'm not a TikTok psychic. And I've never made any assertions, okay? Only opinions and speculation based off the information that's been publicly accessible… If anything, at best, I'm a pop culture guru, but I'm certainly not a crime investigator.” (Zack Peter, 26:08)
2. Nancy Guthrie Case: Rumors & Theories
[28:54–42:16]
-
Ongoing Investigation:
- Over a month since Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance, no meaningful progress—sparking widespread speculation and internet sleuthing.
- Zack highlights the oddity of the situation:
“We're now over a month into this case and we still have no answers. I'm sorry, that's effing weird.” (Zack Peter, 16:46)
-
Reporter Affair Rumor:
- Cites a blind item from the “Crazy Days and Nights” Twitter/X account about two true crime creators allegedly having an affair while covering the Guthrie case.
- Listeners tag Zack, jokingly linking him and News Nation’s Brian Entin.
- Zack plays along but clarifies it's unsubstantiated gossip:
“Now I have to be, like, super specific about what's jokes so that all these little Ellens can stop coming at me in the ats.” (Zack Peter, 36:30)
-
Public Participation:
- Zack reiterates the distinction between public speculation (encouraged by authorities) and actual defamation.
- Critiques performative antics like busty photo shoots at the Guthrie house, calling them “insane” and flagging the lack of “decorum, empathy, and compassion.” (Zack Peter, 53:10)
3. Clinton Depositions — “Pop-Off” & Hot Takes
[42:16–52:35]
-
Coverage & Impressions:
- Zack summarizes the general mood: almost nothing substantive is emerging from the depositions.
“They don't know anything about anything about anything. It's like the Nancy Guthrie case. We don't know anything about anything about anything.” (Zack Peter, 46:10)
- Hillary Clinton appears “mad, mad, mad” but, for Zack, that's not evidence of guilt—just exasperation at being embroiled in the scandals, especially due to Bill.
- Zack summarizes the general mood: almost nothing substantive is emerging from the depositions.
-
Bill Clinton:
- Comes across as shifty and reminiscent in the deposition clips, giving little away.
“He clearly, in my opinion, Ellen, is a pervert. He's a perv.” (Zack Peter, 48:05)
- Comes across as shifty and reminiscent in the deposition clips, giving little away.
-
Marriage Dynamics & Legal Strategy:
- Zack muses on why Hillary still stands by Bill, suggesting shared secrets and mutual legal protection.
- Listeners debate whether spouses can testify against each other; Zack theorizes it’s more about "if you go down, I'm bringing you down with me."
-
Audience Engagement:
- Zack floats whether his audience is interested in more Clinton/Epstein coverage, acknowledging the grimness of the subject.
4. Audience Banter & Community
Throughout
- Zack frequently references and reacts to live chat messages, creating a playful, inclusive vibe—especially when defending his "zacktivated" rants and joking about the “late-night wine posts.”
- Memorable: “Don't @ me late at night when I have to wake up to it in the morning with some bullshit, okay? I'm just—I'm not the bitch.” (Zack Peter, 31:04)
- Shoutouts to regulars (e.g., Danielle, Donna, Molly) and humorous handling of technical issues and inside jokes (“Danielle cracks us up… always taking us off topic!” – [37:22]).
- Encourages listeners to join bonus content, recaps, and “members-only Zooms.”
Notable Quotes & Moments
-
On Defamation vs. Commentary:
“Psychic intuition and tarot cards are not evidence to incriminate somebody.” (Zack Peter, 19:12)
-
On the Guthrie Case:
“Everybody is a suspect. That's just how it goes until the crime is solved.” (Zack Peter, 26:59)
-
Responding to the Instagram Callout:
“Don't [expletive] me, don't [expletive] me late at night because the last thing I want to do is wake up in the morning and deal with some BS… You wanted to tag me publicly. I'm going to respond to you publicly.” (Zack Peter, 15:33)
-
Clinton Commentary:
“What we need is Hillary to go on the Monica Lewinsky podcast now that Monica's trying to make her comeback.” (Zack Peter, 47:38)
-
On Outrageous True Crime Content Culture:
“A busty photo shoot where you're trying to be sexy in front of the memorial of the lady that went missing… get it together.” (Zack Peter, 53:29)
Segment Timestamps
| Segment | Timestamp | |------------------------------------------------------|-------------| | Audience shoutouts, early “zacktivation” | 00:00–12:06 | | $10M TikTok Defamation Case Deep Dive | 12:06–28:54 | | Nancy Guthrie Case — Criticism & Rumors | 28:54–42:16 | | Clinton Depositons Reaction | 42:16–52:35 | | Guthrie Case Outrageous Moments, Photo Shoot, Recap | 52:35–54:40 | | Audience Banter, Wrap-up, Housekeeping | 54:40–end |
Takeaways
- Zack draws a sharp line between conjecture (with disclaimers) and defamatory statements, while providing pointed, humorous commentary on true crime and pop culture scandals.
- He calls out performative or opportunistic behaviors in true crime spaces, defending genuine commentary but satirizing both baseless rumors and reckless content creators.
- Listeners appreciate the blend of sass, skepticism, and community—making Zack’s “zacktivated” take on each headline as entertaining as it is clarifying.
For more tea, chat, or to join the “zacktivated” community, follow @nofilterwithzack and @justplainzack.
