Podcast Summary: Not Just the Tudors – "Othered: Race, Gender & Human 'Monsters'"

Episode Information:

• Title: Othered: Race, Gender & Human 'Monsters'
• Host: Professor Susannah Lipscomb
• Guest: Dr. Sureka Davis, Historian of Science, Art, and Ideas
• Release Date: August 14, 2025

Introduction to Otherness and Monstrosity (00:00 - 03:44)

Professor Susannah Lipscomb sets the stage for the episode by discussing R.A. More's seminal work, The Formation of a Persecuting Society. More posits that between the 10th and 13th centuries, European states developed mechanisms that fostered the persecution of groups deemed "other." This foundational concept of otherness—being different from an established norm—facilitated the creation and vilification of monsters in early modern Europe. Lipscomb introduces the idea that the early modern period was particularly adept at blurring the lines between human and animal, and at characterizing beings based on race and gender, thereby institutionalizing monstrosity in societal narratives.

Humoral Theory and the Flexibility of Humanity (03:44 - 05:50)

Question: Did the belief in the four humors allow people to view humans as malleable and open to transformation into monsters?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"The humoral framework... was hugely important for the way in which early moderns in Europe thought about how flexible individual bodies were... in places where the climate was extremely cold or hot... were monstrified." (04:30)

Dr. Davis explains that the four humors—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile—dictated not only physical health but also influenced perceptions of personality and identity. This framework, combined with climate theory, suggested that extreme environments could denature human beings into monstrous forms. The inherent malleability in humoral theory made the boundary between human and monster porous, fostering fears that anyone could potentially transform into a monster under the right (or wrong) conditions.

Case Study: The Gonsalva Family (06:23 - 09:05)

Question: Can you elaborate on the Gonsalva family's story and its implications?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Petrus Gonzalez... was captured by Spanish sailors... covered in hair, making him an object of fascination." (06:45)

The Gonsalva family serves as a compelling example of how physical abnormalities were perceived as monstrous. Petrus Gonzalez, a hairy man taken to the French court, married a French woman, and their children also exhibited excessive hair growth. Contemporary physicians and aristocrats depicted them in relation to animals, reinforcing the notion of them being outside the normal human category. Artist Joris Hufnacher's unfinished album, Rational Animals and Insects, juxtaposes the Gonsalva family with mythical creatures like pygmies, highlighting societal discomfort with those who deviated from perceived norms. This case illustrates how monstrosity was not inherent but attributed by observers, often leading to the erosion of the individuals' privacy and autonomy.

Medical Perspectives on Monstrosity (09:05 - 13:43)

Question: How did medical thinkers like Edward Tyson view the distinction between humans and animals?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Edward Tyson... mistook a young chimpanzee for an orangutan and concluded the orangutan was distinctly non-human." (09:50)

Dr. Davis discusses Edward Tyson's anatomical studies, which aimed to delineate clear boundaries between humans and apes. Tyson's work underscored the fear among anatomists that physical examination might blur these distinctions, raising concerns about the rationality and moral capacity of beings deemed non-human. This scientific inquiry was intertwined with broader societal fears about dehumanization and the justification of slavery and colonialism. The distinction between species was not just biological but also moral, influencing how entire populations were perceived and treated.

Linnaean Classification and Racial Othering (12:46 - 14:05)

Question: How did Carl Linnaeus contribute to the classification of humans and "monstrous" peoples?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Linnaeus... discussed monstrous peoples as possibly being different species altogether." (12:56)

Carl Linnaeus expanded the classification system to include various human populations, often labeling them as "monstrous" based on superficial differences. His taxonomy not only categorized individual anomalies but also entire groups, questioning their humanity and rational capacity. This scientific categorization provided a veneer of legitimacy to racist ideologies, reinforcing the notion that certain races were inherently inferior or fundamentally different.

European Encounters with Indigenous Peoples (14:05 - 18:05)

Question: How did early European colonists perceive and depict indigenous populations in the New World?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"European observers often focused on unusual accounts, such as cannibalism in Brazil or giants in Patagonia, which were depicted in maps and prints." (15:20)

Dr. Davis explores how European colonists, upon encountering diverse indigenous societies, often interpreted cultural practices and physical appearances through the lens of existing prejudices and humoral theory. Extreme climates were believed to produce monstrous peoples, a belief that justified colonization and exploitation. Sympathetic accounts, like those of Jean de Lry, coexisted with fantastical and often derogatory portrayals, creating a dichotomy between admiration for indigenous achievements and fear of their supposed primitiveness.

Impact of the Transatlantic Slave Trade and Black Codes (20:51 - 27:03)

Question: What role did black codes play in the institutionalization of racism and monstrosity?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Black codes... defined enslaved Africans and white servants in legal terms, facilitating dehumanization and justifying harsh punishments." (22:10)

The transatlantic slave trade necessitated a legal framework to rationalize and perpetuate the enslavement of Africans. Black codes legally codified racial hierarchies, distinguishing between black enslaved individuals and white servants. These laws not only dehumanized the enslaved but also provided legal backing for their exploitation and punishment. This institutional racism deepened societal divisions, making racist beliefs more entrenched and permanent. Dr. Davis emphasizes that while racism in Europe predated the slave trade, the economic imperatives of plantation capitalism amplified and solidified anti-black ideologies.

Follow-up Question: Did racism lead to slavery, or did slavery create racism?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Racism in Europe is much older than the Middle Passage, but the slave trade amplified anti-black racism to justify plantation capitalism." (25:00)

Dr. Davis argues that while racist ideologies existed prior to the Atlantic slave trade, the economic and social demands of slavery significantly intensified and institutionalized these beliefs. The dehumanization necessary for justifying slavery became more sophisticated, intertwining with legal systems to ensure the perpetuation of racial hierarchies.

Gender, Monstrosity, and Power (27:03 - 32:47)

Question: How were female monarchs perceived as monstrous, and what does this say about gender norms of the time?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"John Knox labeled Mary I as a 'monster of monsters,' using classical and religious sources to demonize female rule." (27:30)

Dr. Davis delves into the misogynistic rhetoric used to oppose female rulers like Mary I of England. John Knox's pamphlet demonized female monarchy by equating it to headless creatures and other mythical monstrosities, tapping into contemporary fears and classical imagery. This association of female leadership with monstrosity reflected broader societal anxieties about gender roles and the fragility of social order. Additionally, indigenous perspectives on gender, which were more fluid and accepting of intersexuality, starkly contrasted with rigid European binaries, further alienating non-conforming individuals.

Question: How did indigenous concepts of gender differ from European norms?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Indigenous cultures like the Mexica had fluid gender categories, allowing for shape-shifting and multiple gender identities." (32:15)

Dr. Davis highlights that many indigenous cultures in the Americas possessed more flexible and inclusive understandings of gender. Unlike the rigid binary imposed by European Christianity, these cultures recognized the ability to embody different genders and even merge with animal forms through rituals and symbolism. European observers misinterpreted these practices through their own prejudiced frameworks, viewing them as signs of moral and social deviance rather than alternative forms of identity.

Monstrous Births and Social Perceptions (36:20 - 41:52)

Question: What does James Paris du Plessis's scrapbook reveal about societal perceptions of normalcy and monstrosity?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Du Plessis's scrapbook cataloged a variety of 'monstrous births,' reflecting society's fascination and fear of deviations from the norm." (36:50)

James Paris du Plessis's collection of illustrations and narratives about monstrous births serves as a window into early modern Europe's obsession with categorizing and understanding human abnormalities. The scrapbook includes depictions of intersex individuals, those with excessive hair, and mythical hybrids, illustrating the pervasive fear and fascination with bodily deviations. These stories were not merely scientific curiosities but also fueled moral and religious interpretations, where monstrous births were seen as divine signs or punishments. This categorization reinforced the boundaries of normalcy and justified the marginalization of those who did not fit societal standards.

Question: How did interpretations of monstrous births influence societal treatment of individuals?

Dr. Sureka Davis:
"Monstrosity was subjective, allowing observers to impose narratives that could lead to real-world consequences for those labeled as such." (39:50)

Dr. Davis emphasizes that monstrosity was not an inherent trait but a label assigned by society, often based on subjective interpretations and prevailing biases. Whether viewed as natural anomalies, divine retributions, or accidents of nature, monstrous births allowed society to otherize and control individuals who deviated from the norm. This labeling had tangible impacts, including social ostracization, legal restrictions, and even physical punishments, perpetuating cycles of discrimination and exclusion.

Conclusion: The Legacy of Monstrosity in Early Modern Europe (41:52 - End)

Professor Lipscomb and Dr. Davis conclude by reflecting on how the early modern practices of othering and labeling individuals as monsters laid the groundwork for systemic racism and rigid gender norms that persisted and evolved in subsequent centuries. The episode underscores the importance of understanding historical contexts to comprehend how deeply ingrained prejudices were rationalized and perpetuated through scientific, legal, and cultural narratives.

Notable Quotes:

• Dr. Davis on humoral theory facilitating fears of transformation:
  "The very malleability built into that humoral theory... meant that suddenly anyone could fear that they might not be a fixed being, but rather potentially monstrous." (04:30)

• Dr. Davis on black codes and dehumanization:
  "These laws... facilitated the dehumanization and exploitation of enslaved Africans, making racism more entrenched." (22:15)

• Dr. Davis on gender and monstrosity:
  "John Knox... said, 'a reigning queen is a monster of monsters,' leveraging existing fears to challenge female authority." (27:35)

Final Thoughts

This episode of "Not Just the Tudors" offers a profound exploration of how early modern Europe constructed and perpetuated notions of otherness and monstrosity through scientific theories, legal frameworks, and cultural narratives. By delving into case studies like the Gonsalva family, examining medical theories, and analyzing legal codes, Dr. Sureka Davis provides a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that fueled racism and gender-based discrimination. The discussion highlights the enduring legacy of these early modern practices and their impact on contemporary societal structures.

For listeners seeking to understand the historical roots of current social prejudices, this episode provides valuable insights into the intersection of race, gender, and the concept of monstrosity in shaping human societies.

Subscribe to History Hit:
For more insightful episodes and access to hundreds of hours of original documentaries, visit History Hit.