Odd Lots Podcast: Dan Wang on China's Breakneck Economic Growth
Date: September 1, 2025
Hosts: Joe Weisenthal & Tracy Alloway
Guest: Dan Wang, author of “Breakneck: China’s Quest to Engineer the Future,” research scholar at Hoover Institution
Episode Overview
This episode features China analyst and writer Dan Wang discussing his new book, "Breakneck," and exploring the roots and implications of China's massive building spree, its engineering-centric governance, the social and financial side effects, and what China’s industrial drive means for both its citizens and the global economy. The discussion weaves together historical context, current challenges (such as overcapacity and financial strains), and strategic competition, including the role of AI and shifting US-China dynamics. Throughout, Wang offers nuanced takes—and sometimes wry humor—about China’s strengths, weaknesses, and model for national progress.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. China’s Engineering Culture & Political Economy
- Engineering Mindset at the Top ([05:45]–[09:10])
- Dan Wang notes that China’s leadership is “very heavily engineering pilled.” Many top officials are trained engineers—hydraulic, electrical, or thermal.
- “They treat the mega project as the solution to every problem. They are building enormous dams … highways, new homes, coal plants, hyperscalers. It’s what they know how to do, and it’s what they’re going to do.” — Dan Wang [06:10]
- Historical Roots ([09:10]–[11:09])
- The prevalence of engineers in high leadership positions began especially under Deng Xiaoping, contrasting Mao’s poet-warrior approach.
- Ancient traditions in China also involved massive state-driven infrastructure, such as canals and walls, indicating a longstanding engineering state ethos.
2. Building as Economic Policy: Successes and Costs
- Planning Works—To a Point ([11:09]–[13:40])
- While China has faced criticism for "white elephant projects," Wang stresses: “Chinese living standards and the economy have expanded dramatically … to an extraordinary degree.” — Joe Weisenthal [11:09]
- Wang cautions that the success is more about construction improving lives, not a blanket vindication of central planning: “I think that China has not demonstrated the success of central planning writ large … But a lot of construction has been good for a lot of people.” — Dan Wang [11:53]
- Material and Social Costs
- Huge infrastructure investments improved cities and connected remote areas, but have brought displacement, debt loads (e.g., in poorer provinces like Guizhou), and environmental costs.
- "There’s a lot of material waste … financial problems … displacement of people … but physical construction is mostly pretty good." — Dan Wang [13:17]
3. Overcapacity, ‘Involution,’ and Financial Tensions
- Profitless Competition & Stock Market Stagnation ([13:40]–[15:47])
- Chinese sectors (e.g., solar panels) often see scores of nearly identical firms fighting for slim margins, benefiting global consumers with cheap goods but hurting domestic companies and investors.
- “Maybe this is what socialism with Chinese characteristics means: a lot of state power, a lot of consumer power, but not very much financial investors benefit.” — Dan Wang [15:21]
- Involution Movement ([03:55], [51:01]–[52:12])
- Policymakers are now targeting the reduction of overcapacity and unproductive competition (called "involution"), which is especially hard in the private sector.
- Wang predicts it will be difficult to curb overproduction long-term: "Overproduction is kind of endemic to China… This is what they're really good at." — Dan Wang [51:57]
4. Wellbeing, Worker Discontent, and Authoritarian Risks
- Happiness, Worker Life, and the 'Lie Flat' Movement ([18:31]–[22:06])
- Discussion of working conditions (long hours, little recourse for discontent) versus material progress.
- “You could be working for one of these big tech companies and working 9, 9, 6 … and that’s not very happy … But … cafes are popping up all the time … you can get a bowl of noodles really cheaply.” — Dan Wang [21:15]
- Discontent is present, particularly among elites, censored journalists, and those affected by policy changes or crackdowns, but broad unrest seems unlikely.
5. Policy Volatility and Entrepreneurial Risk
- Regulatory Whiplash ([22:06]–[24:40])
- VC and startup activity in China has suffered due to abrupt policy changes; the risk of sudden regulatory shifts creates a continual "apocalyptic sense" among elites and entrepreneurs.
- “No one feels very safe … your life could fall apart and there’s no one really to protect you, no lawyers that you can turn to, no court system to really turn to.” — Dan Wang [24:22]
6. China: Socialism, Capitalism, or Something Else?
- How to Label the System ([24:40]–[26:47])
- Wang argues that China may be less socialist (little welfare, low taxes, traditional roles, anti-labor policies) than right-wing by global standards:
- “I think it is the most right-wing major country in the world... My simple formulation of China is that it is a Leninist technocracy with grand opera characteristics. Pretty rational most of the time, but then every so often … something really ridiculous.” — Dan Wang [26:24]
7. Convergence and Divergence: U.S.-China Economic Policies
- Is the U.S. Emulating China? ([26:47]–[29:17])
- Discussion of recent U.S. industrial policy, protectionism, and social welfare moves paralleling Chinese actions, but with a warning:
- “Right now I think what we have is authoritarianism without the good stuff … building gilded ballrooms and detention centers.” — Dan Wang [28:17]
8. Industrial Strategy, Global Perceptions, and American Manufacturing
- Changing Perceptions of China ([29:17]–[32:02])
- Dan describes his early focus on China’s industrial strategy (controversial at the time) and notes that Silicon Valley is “totalizing” around AI but often overlooks “we live in a material world … let’s build up a manufacturing base as well.” — Dan Wang [31:48]
- AI and Tech Race Dynamics ([34:26]–[38:14])
- US leads in advanced chips and AI models, but faces power constraints; China, while having less advanced chips, has massive cheap electricity and vast quantities of “mature” chips and industrial data.
- “China has organized itself … to deny nothing toward its heavy industry. Whatever heavy industry wants, it is going to get.” — Dan Wang [35:09]
9. Export Controls and Technological Advancement
- Impact of U.S. Export Controls ([39:46]–[42:42])
- “U.S. export controls really accelerated a lot of Chinese efforts to do better … all of these fiercely competitive companies were fighting for their lives, solving seven problems a day before breakfast.” — Dan Wang [41:47]
- Chinese companies like SMIC and Huawei bounced back and doubled down on domestic R&D as a result.
10. Geopolitical Ambitions and Global Impacts
-
China’s Ambitions Abroad ([42:42]–[45:43])
- China is deeply interested in Taiwan and the South China Sea, with regional ambitions for dominance (expecting neighboring leaders to "kowtow").
- “I would be skeptical that China has broader goals to seize Japan … the clear and present danger is that China’s technology keeps advancing … and that will further deindustrialize parts of the Midwest as well as … Europe.” — Dan Wang [44:27]
-
Implications for US Manufacturing Capacity ([45:43]–[47:28])
- US must invest in manufacturing process knowledge and possibly even learn from inviting Chinese manufacturers, but current US policy (under Trump) lacks direction beyond protectionism.
11. Adoption and Trust in Chinese (and American) Tech
- Will the World Adopt Chinese Core Tech? ([47:28]–[50:00])
- Governments are wary, but consumers simply want affordable, quality goods; resistance is more political than market-driven.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- “They treat the mega-project as the solution to every problem ... it's what they know how to do, and it's what they're going to do.” — Dan Wang [06:10]
- “Maybe two nowheres become two somewheres after it is built.” — Dan Wang, on China's infrastructure turning "bridges to nowhere" into viable routes [12:30]
- “Socialism with Chinese characteristics means … a lot of state power, a lot of consumer power, but not very much financial investors benefit.” — Dan Wang [15:21]
- “There is kind of this apocalyptic sense that hangs over you … a lot of your life could fall apart and there's no one really to protect you, no lawyers that you can turn to, no court system to really turn to.” — Dan Wang, on elite anxiety in China [24:22]
- “My simple formulation of China is that it is a Leninist technocracy with grand opera characteristics.” — Dan Wang [26:24]
- “Right now I think what we have is authoritarianism without the good stuff.” — Dan Wang [28:17], criticizing US attempts to copy China’s approach
Timestamps for Key Segments
- [05:45] Why China Likes Building Stuff: Engineering culture and mega-projects
- [09:10] Engineers in Power: How and why China’s government ended up run by engineers
- [11:09] Planning vs. Markets: Does Chinese success challenge classic economics?
- [13:40] Financial Consequences: Overcapacity, profitless competition, solar markets
- [18:31] Worker Satisfaction & ‘Lie Flat’: Social and psychological tolls
- [22:06] Regulatory Risk & Entrepreneur Spirit: Policy volatility effects
- [24:40] Is China Socialist or Something Else?
- [26:47] US Copying China? Both countries’ evolving models
- [34:26] AI, Infrastructure, & Strategic Advantage
- [39:46] U.S. Tech Export Controls: Spur or setback?
- [42:42] China’s Global Ambitions: What does dominance mean?
- [45:43] American Manufacturing: How to compete and learn
- [47:28] Global Trust in Tech: Will the world use Chinese core tech?
- [51:01] The New ‘Involution’ Campaign: Efforts to control overcapacity
Conclusion
- Dan Wang synthesizes years of firsthand observation and research into a sobering but often wry assessment of China’s turbocharged growth model. China’s engineering-centric leadership drives relentless physical transformation, often at material, financial, and social costs.
- Global narratives about China—whether it’s “socialist,” “right-wing,” or something else—fall short of capturing its technocratic, highly rational yet sometimes bizarre approach.
- The US and other advanced economies face both the allure of China’s operational successes and the challenge of rising deindustrialization.
- Policy lessons: The US should focus on process knowledge, invest in real industrial capacity, and avoid imitating the worst features of either system.
- China's unique social, political, and economic experiments mean that conventional economic frameworks only go so far—a caution both for Beijing and for its rivals.
Final Note:
Dan Wang’s book, “Breakneck,” is recommended for anyone wanting a deeper dive into the themes discussed.
Major participants on Twitter:
- Tracy Alloway: @tracyalloway
- Joe Weisenthal: @TheStal
- Dan Wang: @danwwang
For more episodes and discussion, visit Bloomberg Odd Lots.
