How Chinese Real Estate Became the Biggest Bubble in History

Summary

---

Odd Lots – "How Chinese Real Estate Became the Biggest Bubble in History"

Bloomberg | November 10, 2025
Hosts: Joe Weisenthal, Tracy Alloway
Guest: Mike Bird (Wall Street editor at The Economist; author of The Land Trap: A New History of the World’s Oldest Asset)

---

Episode Overview

This episode delves into the evolution, dynamics, and aftershocks of the Chinese real estate market — widely considered the largest speculative bubble in history. Hosts Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway are joined by Mike Bird, who brings global, historical, and on-the-ground insights from his reporting and his new book. Together, they investigate how land and housing in China have transformed from communist dormitories to high-stakes investment vehicles, unravel the central role of local government finances, and consider how China’s path compares with other global models, especially Hong Kong, Singapore, and the US.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Housing as Social Good vs. Investment Vehicle (01:53–02:48)

• The hosts debate the fundamental question: Is housing meant to be an affordable, social good — or is it an investment asset for wealth creation?

  • Joe Weisenthal: “I just want a very brief period of housing affordability... and then it stops being affordable.”
  • Tracy Alloway highlights that property has historically been “one of the few ladders to wealth for the masses.”

• The conversation situates this tension globally, noting that both the rich world and China confront similar affordability problems, deflating the idea that it’s merely about local policy idiosyncrasies.

2. China as the Ultimate Case Study (03:41–05:05)

• China epitomizes the duality of housing — as both a basic need and a speculative investment.

  • Despite efforts to control prices, moves that threaten property values provoke rare, notable protests.
  • Joe: “I thought they were communists... Where did communists get the idea of real estate?”

• Bird explains the historical shift: as the social safety net receded in the 1990s, Chinese citizens sought out property as a store of wealth for the future.

3. The Evolution of Land Policy (06:00–07:54)

• Mike Bird shares how his reporting in London and Hong Kong opened his eyes to the differing structures of land use/ownership — especially Hong Kong’s system of government-owned, leased land.

  • Hong Kong’s system is contrasted with mainland China’s, which inherited and adapted much of its land-financing model from Hong Kong following reforms initiated in the 1980s.

4. China’s Real Estate Boom: Genesis and Mechanisms (08:06–10:04)

• 1980s–1990s: With the economy transitioning from strict communism towards market-driven forces, housing reform became a catalyst for urban growth and government revenues.

  • Mike Bird recounts how Premier Zhao Zhiyang’s discussions with Hong Kong developers inspired adopting the lease-sale system in places like Shenzhen, starting in 1987.

• Local governments sold leases to raise funds, creating a symbiotic relationship between real estate development and urban fiscal needs.

  • “A big handover from Hong Kong... it’s a really good way of making money, especially if you own all the land.” (08:06)

5. Land Reform: Successes and Failures Globally (10:04–11:57)

• Bird discusses 20th-century land reforms: successful in Japan, Taiwan, Korea, but not replicable elsewhere (India, Vietnam).
  • Joe Weisenthal: “Most recurring theme on this podcast: [success happens] in three East Asian countries; no evidence it works anywhere else.” (11:36)

6. China’s Property Obsession, Financial Repression, and the ‘Great Ball of Money’ (11:58–13:54)

• Bird describes how cultural factors and lack of alternatives (equities, bonds, etc.) made real estate the rational place for household wealth.
  • Bank savings had negative real returns; the stock market performed poorly.
  • “China has the symptoms of both a housing shortage and a housing glut. It manages to get the worst of both worlds.” (13:39)

7. The Limits and Dangers of Speculation: The “Three Red Lines” Policy (16:26–23:49)

• Bird details how, as credit-fueled growth escalated, Chinese authorities attempted to rein in developer leverage by instituting the “three red lines” debt metrics around 2020–2021.
  • The moves were intended to cool off speculation, but instead precipitated sharp contractions, threatening household wealth and developer solvency.
  • “How do you get off the train while it’s moving?” (17:07)
  • Evergrande and others became tangled in unsustainable expansions and diversification (e.g. into EVs).
• The government’s moves attacked developers without addressing household incentives or local fiscal dependency on land.

8. Local Government Finance and the ‘Land Trap’ (23:49–26:52)

• The 1994 tax reform gave local governments massive spending obligations but clawed back revenue, leaving land sales as the main off-balance-sheet revenue stream.

  • “They see the land auctions, which are off-balance-sheet revenues... That’s how we’ll raise money.” (25:22)

• The hosts ask: “Has any country ever successfully gotten out of this situation without collapse or stagnation?” Bird answers, “Basically, no.”

  • The U.S. Great Recession (2008) is cited as one of the least bad outcomes.

9. China’s Economy: Can Manufacturing Replace Real Estate? (27:18–28:39)

• As real estate investment shrinks, authorities try to push excess capital and labor into manufacturing — but Bird argues that China is simply too big for manufacturing alone to absorb the slack:
  • “The domestic real estate market is absolutely gargantuan. The thing you’re trying to replace is enormous.” (28:00)

10. Real Estate’s Drag on Productivity & Misallocated Talent (28:46–30:27)

• Substantial research demonstrates how China’s boom siphoned entrepreneurial and financial resources from higher-productivity sectors into property.
  • “Every big Chinese company was trying to run a real estate company on the side during the 2010s.” (29:41)

11. Land, Reclamation, and the Hukou System (32:58–36:07)

• Real estate’s fixed (but sometimes expandable) supply is discussed, with Bird emphasizing that “creating” more land is about accessibility and urban integration, not just physical reclamation.
• The hukou system’s role in exacerbating speculative housing demand is explained: with welfare tied to one’s place of registration, internal migrants have few options but to buy property either at home or (rarely) where they move.
  • “It’s essentially like a savings technique more than it is [property use].” (35:09)

12. China’s Service Sector, Productivity, and the Future of Asset Allocation (38:01–39:49)

• China’s advanced manufacturing sector is world-class but does not represent the bulk of employment or productivity.
• Despite government efforts to spur equities or alternative investments, deep structural and political reforms are unlikely, limiting diversification of household wealth away from property.

13. Comparative Models: Singapore, Colonial America, and the “Land Trap” (41:57–44:31)

• Bird identifies Singapore as a rare global case where speculation was intentionally divorced from home ownership — through government ownership, tight restrictions, and an active Housing and Development Board.

  • “They’ve divorced usage from speculation... This asset class — land and real estate — is something different. We’re doing a different thing with this.” (43:56–43:59)

• Colonial America’s efforts to turn infinite land into money also discussed.

14. Policy Lessons, Social Contract, and the Prospect for Reform (45:09–48:43)

• China should develop a stronger social safety net to alleviate the compulsion to use real estate for retirement, but political resistance is strong at the top.
  • “There seems to be huge political opposition to doing this at the top of the Chinese Communist Party. And it’s bizarre.”
• U.S. and Western societies might consider property or land taxes to balance the gains from historical property “birth lotteries.”

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On China’s dual role for property:
  • “China is like the ultimate example of that tension between investment asset and social good.” — Tracy Alloway (04:28)
• On the rapid shift toward speculation:
  • “It’s been a completely rational thing for Chinese households... Extremely high-saving households buying property after property — a lot of them left vacant.” — Mike Bird (12:33)
• On government and local finance:
  • "They see the land auctions... That’s how we’ll raise money. And you see the proportion of income rise and rise and rise very aggressively through the late 1990s..." — Mike Bird (25:22)
• On the difficulty of policy reform:
  • “How do you get off the train while it’s moving?” — Mike Bird (17:07)
• On the Singaporean model:
  • “They’ve divorced usage from speculation. A place that most people think of as very capitalistic... has basically decided: this asset class, land and real estate—this is something different.” — Mike Bird (43:59)
• On stagnation and the lack of easy exits:
  • “I would say basically no [country has escaped without collapse or stagnation].” — Mike Bird (26:25)
• Joe’s summary of the core problem:
  • “I just think that for several of the last decades, people didn’t have to choose. You got to live in it and you made a lot of money.” — Joe Weisenthal (50:57)
• On the policy implications for the west:
  • “America has relatively high property taxes anyway. You can do all sorts of things with property taxes to lean more of the value on the land rather than the structures.” — Mike Bird (47:48)

---

Key Timestamps

• 01:53 Show proper begins; housing’s dual role introduced
• 06:00–08:06 Mike Bird recounts how living in London & Hong Kong shaped his perspective
• 08:06–10:04 The start of China’s land-lease model; inspiration from Hong Kong developers
• 10:04–11:57 Land reform in Asia: successes and failures
• 11:58–14:14 “Great ball of money” and the logic for real estate obsession
• 16:26–18:45 The “three red lines” and the problems with speculative finance
• 23:49–26:54 Local government finances and the dependence on land sales
• 27:18–28:39 Limits to manufacturing as an economic substitute
• 28:46–30:27 Real estate’s drag on Chinese productivity
• 32:58–36:07 Urban expansion, land accessibility, and the hukou system
• 41:57–44:31 Singapore’s unique model for separating ownership from speculation
• 45:09–48:43 Policy lessons: can social safety nets displace speculative demand?

---

Closing Thoughts & Tone

Throughout, the conversation is fast-paced, humorous, and candid, balancing deep policy analysis with skepticism about “easy answers.” The hosts and guest frequently lean into global analogies and historical perspective, underlining just how intractable — but also fascinating — the intersection of land, housing, and finance remains. The tone is conversational, sharp, and often wry, with both hosts and guest acknowledging the contradictions and cyclical nature of these “land traps” in history.

---

Suggested Next Steps for Listeners:

• Read Mike Bird’s The Land Trap: A New History of the World’s Oldest Asset
• Explore further Odd Lots episodes on China, property bubbles, and global land policy
• Reflect on how national policies and cultural norms shape the balance between housing as a home vs. investment

---

Transcript

[Joe Weisenthal]

You're being sold an AI future where you're obsolete or irrelevant. That vision is wrong. At Palantir, they're building AI that helps workers and unlocks their full potential. American workers are our nation's greatest strength. AI shouldn't eliminate them, it should elevate them. Palantir is here to tell their stories. From factories to hospitals, AI is freeing people from drudgery, letting them do what humans do. Create, solve, build. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.

[Tracy Alloway]

Hiscox Small Business Insurance knows there is no business like your business. Across America, over 600,000 small businesses, from accountants and architects to photographers and yoga instructors, look to Hiscox Insurance for protection. Find flexible coverage that adapts to the needs of your small business with a fast, easy online', @hiscox.com that's his cox.com there's no business like small business.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

Hiscox Small Business Insurance.

[Tracy Alloway]

A great presentation can be the difference between success and failure.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

The difference between a good presentation and a great one.

[Tracy Alloway]

That's Canva. Canva brings your ideas together in one place with one powerful app. Use AI to move faster. Collaborate easily. Because great things happen when people create together. No wonder 95% of Fortune 500 companies use it. Canva lets you bring your big ideas to life as fast as you can think of them.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

Putting imagination to [e-mail] Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts Radio News.

[Tracy Alloway]

Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

[Joe Weisenthal]

And I'm Joe Weisenthal.

[Tracy Alloway]

Joe, we've talked before in reference to. I think it was the US Real estate market.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah.

[Tracy Alloway]

But there seems to be this weird thing going on with housing where it feels like policymakers, or maybe people even are not sure what exactly they want it to be.

[Mike Bird]

Right.

[Tracy Alloway]

Is it supposed to be this social good, this affordable thing? We all can live somewhere that we can, you know, preferably a place we want to live in, something that we can afford. Or. Or is it effectively a giant piggy bank? Yeah, an investment vehicle. In which case we would expect prices to always keep going up.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah, right. I mean, my personal preference is for housing to be very affordable, very briefly. And then that time that I buy accumulate more housing and then it stops being affordable. That's my. I don't. Many people have different takes. I just want a very brief period.

[Tracy Alloway]

Well, this is another thing about housing.

[Joe Weisenthal]

It's very important that in that brief period I don't lose my job. It's very important that in that brief period, my other investments don't go down. I just want a very brief period of housing affordable.

[Tracy Alloway]

But this is another thing about housing, which is like, historically, it is one of the few ladders to big wealth for the masses. Right? We've all heard the stories about artists in Soho buying a loft for like $500. Now it's worth 10 million. So correct. Good for them.

[Joe Weisenthal]

The other thing that's interesting about housing, particularly when it comes to affordability, is that this seems to be a truly global challenge. So people have lots of theories, like, oh, it's because they didn't allow it zoning in San Francisco or whatever. And it's like, maybe. But like, I think any question about housing affordability has to wrestle with the fact that this is a really global phenomenon. So it can't be some idiosyncratic thing. It does seem as though places where housing is more affordable do not have particularly dynamic economies. So it's like, I know that people are like, oh, look how cheap Tokyo is. It's like a YIMBY success story. But like, they had a massive bubble and it's been deflating ever since. And it's not like Japan is at like some cutting edge of particularly any booming industries and its population.

[Tracy Alloway]

Japan's still pretty nice.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I'm sure it's very nice. I'm not saying otherwise. It's just not clearly not where the action is. I'd love to go to Japan. It seems like one of the nice places. And the other thing that's interesting about this, which is that there are all kinds of ills that sort of bedevil, particularly the rich world these days. And then we look at China, it's like, oh, they have it all figured out. It seems like housing is a mess in China too. One of these rare congratulate, like sort of like moments where we could shake hands with China is like, yeah, we're dealing with a lot of the same issues.

[Tracy Alloway]

Well, here's the thing. China is like the ultimate example of that tension between investment asset and social good. Right? Because even in China, as you point out, there are affordability issues. And every once in a while, you see policymakers try to put limits on house prices in, like, really expensive cities. But then when they start doing stuff that like, actually pops housing prices, everyone starts protesting, which is kind, you know, a rare thing in China. So that is the tension.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I also find real estate speculation in China to be. I thought they were communists, and I mean that unironically. Like, where did communists get the idea of real estate?

[Tracy Alloway]

No. Well, this is another Thing because the social net starts going away in like the 1990s, and so people have to do something with their money to have retirement income to, you know, I guess.

[Joe Weisenthal]

The houses in the old days used to like, be owned by the companies. They're more dormitories. And then when that started, split apart. I don't know. Maybe our guest knows more.

[Tracy Alloway]

Yeah, we do have the perfect guest.

[Joe Weisenthal]

The perfect guest.

[Tracy Alloway]

Yes. We are going to be speaking with Mike Bird. He is of course, the Wall street editor over at the Economist, the author of the new book all about this called the Land A New History of the World's Oldest Asset. So welcome to the show, Mike.

[Mike Bird]

Thank you very much for having me. Great to be here.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I love Mike. We both love Mike. So we're excited to have you.

[Tracy Alloway]

Also someone who spent some time in Asia when I was there in Hong Kong as well, so knows the sort of global history of land. And I was reading your book and you go all the way back to like Babylon or Samaria, so very impressive. So why did you decide to look at land?

[Mike Bird]

It's a great question. I guess it started. I started my career in London and there's a huge thing in London about housing as there is here, you know, people's lack of ability to afford it. I think it's even, even worse in the UK than the US because, you know, the. The culture of equity investing and all sorts of other things is so much weaker. But I guess I really got into it when I moved to Hong Kong because Hong Kong felt like London on steroids. The housing was even more expensive. It was part of, you know, I moved in 2018. You there, Tracy. It was like the extraordinary bull run, like the absolute peak of the post 2008 surge in Hong Kong. And learning about how land was really expensive, but also the government owned all the land and leased the land out and made money from the land. I found that very confusing and it helped me to sort of dig into things and I think it helped me to like, start thinking about this as like a framework of how land works in different places and how you can use it and abuse it and whatever. And yeah, Hong Kong was a great place to think about that because it's such a example story of how bad things can get.

[Joe Weisenthal]

So if you buy property in Hong Kong, what exactly are you buying?

[Mike Bird]

You are buying like you buy an apartment, right? But you don't own the land. So if, say you're a real estate developer, right, you buy a land lease from the government, like a 75 year, 99 year land lease. They've clipped back and extended the, the terms of the lease over time. But yeah, that's what you're buying. You're buying the right to use it for a certain amount of time.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Does it ever just go away like other examples, like, you know what, 75 years is up, not your land.

[Mike Bird]

This is a big problem. It's a big problem. And in these places, in places like Hong Kong and Singapore, there is the difficulty of when lots of the land starts to roll over, when lots of the leases start to get at the end. The question of whether you just bow to political pressure and just give it to people. Right. Just let people keep it, or whether you kick them off and start again, whether you knock something down and rebuild. It's a big difficult issue.

[Tracy Alloway]

Yeah, Mozambique is the other country I know that does this, which is kind of funny. Also, communist history there. Anyway, what role does housing actually play in the Chinese economy?

[Mike Bird]

So I think the best part of living in Hong Kong was learning how this relates to Hong Kong. Right? So put in very simple terms, the 1980s, Chairman Mao is dead, Deng Xiaoping consolidating power. And you're in a strange position where you have to start, or Deng wants to start bringing in market forces into the economy, but it's pretty dangerous. He's got a lot of political opponents. You've got to step pretty slowly. And housing is one of the areas that's most difficult. China's housing at the time is pretty ramshackle and terrible. It's attached, as Joe suggested at the beginning, to like the industrial base. Your employer houses you on a farm or next to a factory or wherever it is. But what China needs is urban, modern residential housing. So Zhao Zhiyang, who's the premier of China later on, and he's one of the sort of peak reformers in Deng's China. He credits this to a conversation with a Hong Kong real estate developer called Henry Fok, who said in a conversation with him where Zhao was explaining, like the difficulty of, oh, we don't have any money and we can't get foreign investment in. And Henry Fox said, but if you have land, why, why don't you have money? How can you not have money? And basically they started adopting on a small scale initially the Hong Kong system. They started leasing out land to make money first. One of these is in Shenzhen in December 1987. There's an auction. The Hong Kong government gives them the gavel to do the auction. They're auctioned off a pretty small piece of land. But this is a symbolic thing because, you know, it's a communist country and the Chinese government owns all the land. They haven't even, at this point, changed the constitution to make this legal. They're sort of experimenting just at the edge. And then slowly this becomes the main financing model. There's a big tax change in the middle of the 1990s that shifts this, but it's a really good way of making money, especially if you're the government and you own all the land. China owns that in the mainland for communist reasons, but it's actually a handover to some degree from Hong Kong.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Actually. Can I back up a few decades? What's land reform? You always hear the people debating economics, like, oh, they instituted land reform, or this is really important. This one else says, oh, no, actually, land reform was not that. What is land reform?

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, I've got a chapter on this in the book, and it was sort of, towards the end of it, quite carefully worded to not upset the people that feel very strongly about land reform. Land reform.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Things you don't talk about on Twitter.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Joe Weisenthal]

L *ND Reform.

[Mike Bird]

Absolutely.

[Joe Weisenthal]

The bots don't attack the.

[Mike Bird]

Land reform is mostly middle of the 20th century phenomenon. And it's basically, there was a lot of economic thinking at the time. There's a guy called Wolf Ladyzinski who was a U.S. department of Agriculture employee. He was an economist, and he was an obsessive about land reform, which essentially is redistributing really concentrated ownership of land to larger numbers of people, especially in the developing rural world. We're not talking about, like, you know, cities or anything here. And he went into Japan after World War II. A bunch of other reformers basically forced the Japanese government at the time to pass a land reform bill which redistributed an enormous amount of Japan's agricultural land. This happens in Taiwan as well, in South Korea. And there's a huge amount of attempts to do it elsewhere, to varying degrees across Asia and other parts of the world. Basically, it's by far the most successful in those three original countries. They try it in India, it doesn't work. They try it in Vietnam, South Vietnam. It doesn't really work. You know, I think one of the.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Most impressing recurring themes on this podcast is the number of times there is some, like, sort of very successful project in industrialization or economic development. And then at the end, there's this asterisk. But it's only ever worked in three, like, East Asian countries. And we have no evidence that any of this works anywhere else.

[Tracy Alloway]

Here's. Now we have another one that you cannot use.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah.

[Tracy Alloway]

Okay. Well, the other thing about land in China, and again, we're sort of fast forwarding back to the 90s and we should talk about the hukou system as well later on. But land has this really unique position, I guess, culturally, socially and financially for Chinese people. Right. Like everyone basically decides they want to be a landlord, they want to own an apartment even if it's not built. You see the ads in like newspapers for flyers, things like that in a way that you don't necessarily see them for stocks or bonds. Right?

[Mike Bird]

Totally. I think there's a big cultural thing there. I'm never too sure whether I'm like a culture is downstream of policy or policy is downstream of culture guy, but there clearly is a big cultural impulse there. Whatever it's driven by. I remember when I lived in Hong Kong, obviously not mainland China, but you used to get adverts pushed through your door and they'd be like, invest in the Northern English Riviera. Right. There's this housing in Leeds and Bradford to be bought as investment properties. This is a big thing. You didn't get those in Leeds and Bradford. Right. If you live in the uk, you don't get those adverts. So, yeah, it's a. It's a big cultural thing. It's also a big thing in the mainland, I think, because of financial repression, basically. You can't invest long term in the equity market in China. Right. It's a sideways game. It's a terrible way of compounding wealth. Bank accounts in general in China, for a very long period of its modern history, had real negative returns because of financial repression. So the question is, if you're saving a lot of money, where do you put it? And there's only really been one answer. It's been a completely rational thing for Chinese households to do that. Extremely high saving households buying property after property, a lot of them left vacant. One of the things I say in the book is that China has the symptoms of both a housing shortage and a housing glut. Right. It manages to get the worst of both worlds.

[Tracy Alloway]

Joe, you know what I call this?

[Joe Weisenthal]

What?

[Tracy Alloway]

China's great ball of money.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah.

[Tracy Alloway]

That's rolling within the country from asset class to asset class.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Silicon Valley is selling you a future where you're obsolete or worse, identical. At Palantir, they're witnessing something different and revolutionary. From re industrializing the nation's defense base to shipyard workers building faster and frontline workers boosting productivity. AI is transforming work across the nation. AI is not replacing American workers or flattening them into conformity. It's unleashing what makes each one irreplaceable. Their judgment, their craft, their creativity. When American workers become more powerfully themselves, they own the future. Palantir making Americans irreplaceable.

[Mike Bird]

This mailchimp horrific jingle is brought to you by mailchimp. Mailchimp you're marketing with AI and more.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Advanced automations to connect to your store. Mailchimp your marketing and boost your clicks multi channel campaigns now with SMS lights lit mailchimp. You're marketing today with the number one.

[Mike Bird]

AI powered email marketing and automation platform Intuit.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Mailchimp number one based on publicly available data on competitors customers plans vary SMS available as add on visit mailchimp.com when.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

You'Re in HR, it can feel like nothing is easy. From payroll to pto, from onboarding to benefits, and everything in between, it's a constant juggle of tasks, systems and spreadsheets. But your HR software, that's the easy part. Meet BambooHR. Trusted by over 34,000 companies, it handles all your HR tasks, payroll, benefits and time tracking so your team and your company can grow as fast as well. Bamboo and BambooHR software is actually easy to use. One simple system that pulls all your people data together in one place. So you can ditch scattered systems and wasted hours on tasks that should only take minutes. Because when HR is easier, you can focus on what matters most. Your people. HR is hard. Bamboohr is easy. Ready to simplify all your HR tasks for a limited time. Get a $100 Visa gift card when you complete a free [e-mail] giftcard again, that's bamboohr.com giftcard terms and conditions apply.

[Joe Weisenthal]

So okay, the stock market hasn't done well for a very long time. Rates on savings are very low. How did like Chinese leaders feel about this emergence of a very speculative high growth, high return, at least during the good old days. Yeah, before a few years ago. About the emergence of this industry, about this emergence of this sort of thing that's crucial for living and also becoming a major speculative vehicle.

[Mike Bird]

Houses are for living, not for speculation, as people say. Yeah, I mean I should say it's an incredibly useful way of building out a city. This tool is like super powerful. If you're just starting out and no one wants to invest, it's a really good way of pairing real estate development with infrastructure. You can pay for a lot of things. You can do it sort of expanding very, very Rapidly.

[Tracy Alloway]

Plus you boost other sectors totally.

[Mike Bird]

Construction, manufacturing, employment build out. Right. You don't industry. Yeah. You don't have to do that much administration. It's fairly easy to do this stuff. Right. So there's lots of advantages to it. I think people start to see the problems even at the level of the central Chinese government in the sort of early 2000 and tens and you get this series of whack, a mole attempts to get the big ball of money, the big ball of credit out of the system. So the first thing you see is the Chinese leadership saying, okay, banks, limits on real estate lending to developers, which is what pushes them into the international bond markets where most of the Chinese property developers fund themselves. Then you see the limits on borrowing from the bond market which sort of come in and out during the 2010s and eventually it's sort of seriously limited in 2020, 2021. But even then you see Chinese developers trying to essentially borrow through pre sales from ordinary Chinese households. Right. Which is like you give me all the money to build your house up front, I promise I'll get round to it. You know, not stating, actually I've got 20 other projects that I've got to build with your money first. There's no escrow system here. So yeah, you do see the Chinese government sort of waking up to the problems. But it's like in any other country, you know, it doesn't have same sort of Western democratic politics, but how do you get off the train while it's moving? Right. And they've tried with the three red lines and the campaign against the real estate development sector in the last five years and it hasn't gone very well.

[Joe Weisenthal]

You know something I wonder about, you always hear about the CCP trying to learn the lessons of the collapse of the Soviet Union and they don't want to have that fame. So they're very obsessed with this question of what brought the Soviet Union down. Do they spend much time looking at the collapse of the Japanese real estate bubble and the effect that that had on Japan as an industrial dynamo?

[Mike Bird]

It's a great question. I'm not in direct touch on a day to day basis. My understanding was that, that they did, that this was a preoccupation of the Chinese leadership. I used to hear it a lot from people close to economic and financial policymaking that this was a serious consideration and it was why they didn't want to pop the bubble, which is essentially what the Japanese government and the bank of Japan did at the very end of the 1980s. Early 1990s, they seem to have done that anyway. I mean, it is a fascinating thing. There's always this discussion of, you know, an autocratic regime can think in really long term, they think in decades and centuries. But in this case, there was a land financing model that China's local governments had, which has been pulled out from under them. There was an asset class that Chinese households could invest in, which has been pulled out from under them. The government hasn't replaced those two things with anything particularly good.

[Tracy Alloway]

We certainly know that they look at it now, right? Because we had Richard Koo on the podcast a couple of times and we know that deflationary spiral caused by real estate collapse is kind of a topic du jour over there. Talk more about the three red lines because this is something I remember. They came out when we were both in Hong Kong and you could see why policymakers were doing it. And to some extent, you know, okay, house prices came down and there's less new builds and things like that nowadays. But they also seem to kind of flub them, right?

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, totally. So the three red lines were basically, the Chinese government identifies the real estate developers as the tool through which they're going to cool the housing market down. And they come out with the three red lines, which are three different metrics of debt to cash and other sort of debt metrics. And they basically say if you violate one or two of these, you can maybe keep borrowing only to refinance old debt. If you're green on all of the three red lines, you're fine, right? If your metrics are okay, keep borrowing, go for it. But none of them are at this point. And if you have three red scores on the red lines, basically if you're violating all of these, no borrowing even to refinance, right? You've got to pay down debt. Now, these companies are some of the most insanely structured financial vehicles in history. They can only expand through extremely rapid debt driven growth. The model is such if you're Evergrande and you're paying a 15% interest on your borrowing, you've got to keep borrowing to expand, right? It's not a good idea, but you've got nothing else, right?

[Tracy Alloway]

So the funny thing about Evergrande also is the diversification into a bunch of other things. I remember again in Hong Kong asking someone like, we should do a graphic of China Evergrande's, all their different businesses, right? Because it would be really interesting. And it took like three weeks to make. And when it came out it was almost unreadable because There were just so many of them like splayed out.

[Joe Weisenthal]

You know, it sounds like we work. I mean that was a company that had diversified into literal wave, a wave pool business and about a hundred other things. So yeah, walls are just an insanely complicated leveraged organization that was a multi billion dollar unicorn, now is worth a bag of Fritos.

[Mike Bird]

We mocked when they bought Faraday Futures, the US EV company and we all mocked right Evergrande saying everyday futures. But honestly now I'm like, maybe if they the three red lines hadn't come in, we'd be like there does be.

[Joe Weisenthal]

This Carsonization of Chinese companies. We're on a long enough timeline. They're all becoming EV companies. Like I. There was a great article in Bloomberg earlier this week about multiple vacuum cleaner companies in China that are now releasing EVs. So I guess it makes that their.

[Mike Bird]

Argument was always like, you know, where do you put your car? In the car park in the estate that you live in? Who built that?

[Joe Weisenthal]

It was vertical integration.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, yeah, they believed in it. But basically, yeah, they bring the three red lines in. The real estate development sector begins contracting very rapidly. The most indebted companies get into trouble almost immediately. But also some of the companies that people thought were pretty safe that borrowed at pretty low rates are getting into trouble fairly quickly as well. You sort of Country Gardens, China, Vancouver, like they're all getting into trouble quite quickly. The way I think of it is that basically the Chinese government attacked the sector that had grown up to intermediate between the households and the local governments. But they didn't change anything about the incentives for the households of local governments. The households still need to invest, the local governments still need money from somewhere. And these companies were just making that arrangement work for those two sides, I see. And destroying them does nothing really, you know, causes a lot of distress. Construction activity drops. Lots of people aren't going to get the homes they invested in through the pre sale system. But it doesn't really address the actual core driving forces.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Talk a little bit more about the local government finances and what it is about land that is particularly important because there are other ways that local governments could, theoretically taxes, all that stuff, etc.

[Tracy Alloway]

I was never sure what the driving, if the driving force was at the sort of Beijing national level or if it was the local governments that you know, first started doing this because they're like, oh, here's a way to make money and develop and look good in Beijing's eyes. And then Beijing just kind of went with it.

[Mike Bird]

So I would trace it Back largely to, as I said before, you know, people started experimenting with land auctions, land sales from 1987. It starts to get more popular in the early 90s. But it's 1994 when they change the tax and spending system. A distribution of spending and tax responsibilities between the Chinese central and local governments that really sort of hammers it home. So traditionally, China People's Republic, quite decentralized in terms of revenue and spending obligations. Local governments did most of the tax raising, they did most of the spending. The central government told them there were certain things they had to do, but they did it all fairly independently. And then 1994, they switched the system and the central government says, you could raise a rev, but we'll take most of that. Right? We'll tell you how much you get back of that. It became a much more centralized system, and overnight the local governments were left with huge spending responsibilities. Those don't change, but only making sort of 60 or 70% of the money that they needed to fund them. They stumble through the 1990s trying to find ways of doing this. There's lots of sort of flagrantly illegal administrative fees and fines placed on things. This actually gets them in trouble because it's very politically sensitive. You know, there's rural Chinese residents being absolutely rinsed for anything the local governments can get their hands on. And they land on, on, on land. Basically, they see the, the land auctions, which are off balance sheet revenues. They do not count for the purposes of being remitted to Beijing in the same way that normal tax revenues do. And they say, right, okay, that's it. That's what we'll do. That's how we'll raise money. And you see the proportion of income rise and rise and rise very aggressively through the late 1990s from a pretty sort of residual amount that was useful for. It was useful for land allocation. It wasn't mostly useful at the beginning for raising money. And it becomes the main fundraising tool.

[Tracy Alloway]

And then they're in the trap. Yeah, the land trap. Has any country ever successfully gotten out of this type of situation?

[Mike Bird]

It depends what you mean by success.

[Tracy Alloway]

Yeah, depends what you mean by success without a massive collapse or without a period of very long stagnation, which seems to be what China is in now.

[Mike Bird]

I would say basically no. And funnily enough, I actually think one of the biggest, best cases for relatively rapid, like return to normalcy is after 2008 in the US specifically. You can tell how few cases there are that I'm using the Great Recession.

[Tracy Alloway]

This is the best one as like.

[Mike Bird]

This might be the best outcome for a number of different reasons. But yeah, that might be the best outcome. There are places that didn't get into the trap in the first place.

[Tracy Alloway]

That that seems to be the ideal probably.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I've obviously never been to mainland China. All of the China news that I consume is on propaganda that makes it onto my Instagram reels that shows all these incredible futuristic cities and robots doing everything. 100% of my China news consumption makes it look like paradise on earth. Again, because I only consume propaganda, is it actually stagnating?

[Mike Bird]

I will say I can't claim to have been to mainland China for years now. I think it is. I think the long term threat from undermining what was really right at the middle of the Chinese development model for a very long time and not replacing it with anything has been really dangerous. You've seen this effort as investment in the real estate sector has dropped and dropped and dropped to drive it into the manufacturing sector. But the reality is the manufacturing sector, as big as it is in China, isn't big enough to productively absorb all of this.

[Joe Weisenthal]

This is the question, can the US, can the Chinese manufacturing sector just be so dominant that it just offsets the decline in real estate? And your analysis is no?

[Mike Bird]

My analysis is no. Chinese economy is too big, I would say. And too big means that the domestic real estate market is absolutely gargantuan. Right. The thing you're trying to replace is enormous and there's only so many buyers for your products in the rest of the world. And this is why you see, I think the anti involution campaigns, right, trying to get consumption up, exactly the pressure against it because the, the sort of consequences, the negative consequences are already starting to display themselves. And we're really like three years into this really big push to drive the investment into manufacturing and it's showing those problems in a way that it took real estate much longer. I don't think it can be a like for like replacement.

[Tracy Alloway]

Wait, talk more about real estate and productivity because this is something that I didn't really internalize until I read the chapter in your book. The China chapter.

[Mike Bird]

Yes. So there is a lot of really, really interesting research about real estate in China and what it's done to productivity. So if you think about it from the perspective of we're going to get into a banking argument, that's already, that's going to get me in trouble as well in terms of like the, you know, the amount of credit you can have. But if you think there's any constraint on the amount of credit? Which obviously in China there is, there are actual like targets and limits. It's still a fairly state oriented system in lots of different ways. Then the resources going to one part of the economy means they aren't going to another part of the economy. And in China's case this means employment, it means material investment, it means steel and concrete and copper and everything else. The real estate sector in general in the long run I think has pretty low productivity. You can build constructively in places where housing is really in demand, but there's only so much you can get out of it.

[Tracy Alloway]

You're not making new stuff.

[Mike Bird]

No, totally. And certainly in China what has happened and what was certainly happening during the run up to the the three red lines policy is you saw a lot of productive, entrepreneurial and innovative activity instead going into real estate. We talk about Chinese real estate developers having lots of arms. Every big Chinese company was trying to run a real estate company on the side during the 2010s. Right? Because there's so much money to be made, why not, why not do that as well? And there's really interesting research from Yu Shi at the IMF talking about how individual Chinese entrepreneurs would go into real estate over time because there's so much money to be made and it is productivity destroying. Especially if I think you're in a state oriented financial system where you're not probably going to see like a 2008 style crash. This is where you see the consequences come through.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Ah, that's interesting. When you wanna grow your list size.

[Tracy Alloway]

Pop up like it's hot.

[Mike Bird]

Pop up like it's hot Pop up like it's hot.

[Tracy Alloway]

And when you gotta boost your revenue.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

Pop up like it's hot Pop up like it's hot Pop up like it's hot. Pick your favorite template you can tailor to your brand. They're mailchimperific.

[Mike Bird]

You're gonna be a fan. Mailchimp your marketing with our new customizable pop ups.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

When you're in hr, it can feel like nothing is easy. From payroll to pto, from onboarding to benefits and everything in between, it's a constant juggle of tasks, systems and spreadsheets. But your HR software, that's the easy part. Meet BambooHR. Trusted by over 34,000 companies, it handles all your HR tasks, payroll, benefits and time tracking. So your team and your company can grow as fast as well. Bamboo. And BambooHR software is actually easy to use. One simple system that pulls all your people data together in one place. So you can ditch scattered systems and wasted hours on tasks that should only take minutes. Because when HR is easier, you can focus on what matters most, your people. HR is hard. Bamboo HR is easy.

[Tracy Alloway]

Ready to.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

To simplify all your HR tasks for a limited time, get a $100 Visa gift card when you complete a free [e-mail] giftcard. Again, that's bamboohr.com giftcard. Terms and conditions apply.

[Tracy Alloway]

This is Jacob Goldstein from what's yous Problem?

[Mike Bird]

Business software is expensive.

[Tracy Alloway]

And when you buy software from lots of different companies, it's not only expensive, it gets confusing.

[Mike Bird]

Slow to use, hard to integrate. Odoo solves that, because all Odoo software.

[Tracy Alloway]

Is connected on a single affordable platform. Save money without missing out on the features you need. Odoo has no hidden costs and no limit on features or data. Odoo has over 60 apps available for any needs your business might have, all at no additional charge. Everything from websites to sales to inventory to accounting, all linked and talking to each other.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Check out Odoo at O D O O dot com.

[Tracy Alloway]

That's O D O O dot com.

[Joe Weisenthal]

You know, I'm thinking about that line in the Sopranos where AJ tells us on. He's like, buy real estate. They're not making any more of it. Whether China, elsewhere. That's not really true. Like, A, artificial islands exist. B, again, in the artificial islands, literally.

[Tracy Alloway]

A drop in the ocean.

[Joe Weisenthal]

You gotta start somewhere. You gotta start somewhere. But more importantly, again, my mainlining consumption of Chinese propaganda, I always see these things, like, this used to be a desert. Now it's this beautiful, like, farmable land. And there is greenery here. Like, whether it's China or elsewhere in the history of land. Like, it's not really that fixed. They always find new ways to sort of create habitable land. That's. That's what it means to be human.

[Mike Bird]

I think there's. There's two things there. One is, like, actual reclamation, which is like. We've probably added like, a.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Can you. By the way, I think that's the most powerful word in the English language, reclamation. Because it's like. It means turning watery land into land.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah.

[Joe Weisenthal]

But the implication is like, we are reclaiming it. We are reclaiming what used to be ours. I think that's such a powerful word.

[Mike Bird]

It's very like Francis Bacon sort of thing. It's very like, you know, man's dominion. Yeah.

[Joe Weisenthal]

It's like this land that we can't live in was only a. We were temporarily embarrassed, unavoidable.

[Mike Bird]

In the grand scheme, it's always good to do land reclamation where you can, but there's really not very much of it.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Okay.

[Mike Bird]

I think the more interesting way that you can create more land in the way that I think of it is more like if you think of land as a. Like a commutable, reachable area, then we've always transitioned more land. Right? It's like the Bronx wasn't useful land 150 years ago, and now it's extraordinarily expensive land because you can get into the productive center of New York. And that's actually one thing that loosens the sort of trap conditions around land over time. You see this in the U.S. like during the early 20th century, you saw New York, for example, loosen a lot of its problems with housing and real estate, because suddenly it was like the outer boroughs. You could populate full of people, and they could work in Manhattan still. And that was fine. And that was a bit like creating multiple New York's worth of land to attach to it.

[Tracy Alloway]

Oh, here's where we can talk about the hookah system, because that ended up being precisely a limiting force on this dynamic.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, absolutely. And I think that that feeds into the whole question of the Chinese welfare system and the fact that Chinese households are driven to invest so aggressively in land. Right? If your welfare is linked completely to the place where you grew up and you become a migrant worker and you go and work somewhere else, then you're going to want to invest very aggressively, either in real estate, where you can in the place you move to, or in real estate at home. It's essentially like a sort of savings technique, more than it is, again, in China. It feels like the land use and the land as an asset are more divorced from one another than anywhere else. You can see this in the rental yield data, right? Rental yields in China. Rents in China aren't expensive. Even in the really popular cities, they're not expensive at all. So that sort of gap and the hukou system really feeds into this by essentially, it's another force driving Chinese households to invest more and more and more.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Sorry, I don't totally understand. Explain a little further. What is the essence of the system? What are the constraints at play? And then clarify, like, how it. How that the incentives, therefore, are to acquire.

[Mike Bird]

The essence of the system basically, is that you have a welfare system that is linked to the place where you're registered as a household. It's usually the place where you grew up, right? So you're able to get all sorts of different ordinary welfare State things based there only. And if you move for work, it doesn't matter. Right. So you're not eligible if you're a migrant worker to all of those things in Shanghai, for example. And these things are really, really.

[Joe Weisenthal]

So you can move there, you can.

[Mike Bird]

Move there, but you can move there.

[Joe Weisenthal]

But you really be a sort of literally a second class citizen.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, absolutely. So this is without huge amounts of external migration or with almost no external migration, really. China has been able to create the system that lots of other parts of the world have with very poorly paid migrant workers turning up who don't have many rights in the place they're moving to. These are the people doing the construction jobs, they're people doing a lot of the low paid work.

[Tracy Alloway]

And I don't know if this still happens, but I remember in the 2000s, if you early 2000s, if you walked around Beijing at night and looked in the windows of some of the restaurants, the waiters would be sleeping on the table because most of them came in from the farmland, didn't have access to housing. So kind of crazy.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, yeah.

[Joe Weisenthal]

People who are sort of more on the immigration restrictionist and in the US will often say things like, you know, the US has actually fallen behind on productivity because we have this endless supply of cheap labor with diminished rights. Had we not had that, that would have forced US firms to do more capital deepening, maybe invest in robots, et cetera. It's interesting because we think of China as a very advanced industrial nation and yet your description of that makes me think that story doesn't really hold water.

[Mike Bird]

Totally. And I understand why people concentrate on that element of the Chinese economy. It's like the most exciting, interesting bit. And you don't need to downplay in any way the advanced manufacturing and the sort of hyper futuristic elements of it to say that that doesn't represent the overwhelming share even Chinese industry. Right. Which is relatively low productivity, relatively low return. It's at scale, but it's not enormously like futuristic. And certainly once you get out of the manufacturing industry, you are going into the standard East Asian development model where the service industry's productivity is absolutely awful. Right. Really, really poor service productivity. So yeah, I think it's a. The two things are true at once. Right. It's large and it contains multitudes, but it's not most of the story to me.

[Tracy Alloway]

Do you see any signs that Chinese people are starting to, I guess, move into other assets like equities? Probably not bonds, but we know that government has been trying to stimulate the entire economy And I think they've been pretty clear they've been trying to lift various asset prices, not how well now they're doing housing as well, actually. But do you see any signs that people are starting to change their minds on something like Chinese equities?

[Mike Bird]

I think to make the Chinese equity market really work, you would have to make a series of deep political decisions about the way China's run that I think they probably won't make, which is basically things like Jack Ma, when he got really slapped down, right? Basically you need to allow that sort of behavior, right? You need to allow the innovation, you need to allow the entrepreneurs to sort of go nuts. You can't have all of these restrictions around. We don't want the young people playing video games and we want it to be driven into this kind of robotics and not that kind. And all of those sort of limitations are going to, I would say, prevent that from happening. There's too much political activity that a Chinese company has to do.

[Joe Weisenthal]

What about just like the hyper competitiveness? I mean, people say, well, well, there's hundreds of EV companies in China, most of them are going to fail. And yet you read about new launches. I don't know. Like, this is one of those stories that I really like because it feeds all my biases. So therefore I'm sort of very skeptical of it. But I probably repeated it's like, oh, like China's stock market hasn't done well because they're too good at capitalism, because it's too competitive, because they really get it, they're really competing, has driven all this abundance and so forth. Like, is there something to that, that, like, the reason Chinese equities haven't done well is because with such intense competition with the provinces all having their normal champions, that none can really sort of capture something that might reflect sort of monopoly rents?

[Mike Bird]

I think there's definitely something to that in a way. When I think about that, I would say it's true when you're subsidizing the competition, it's not true of competition in general. It seems crazy to me to say, like, net bad if everyone's getting like cheap inputs and there's lots of competition.

[Joe Weisenthal]

But the provinces still do have a role in subsidizing, either implicit, explicitly or directly in subsidizing their national champions. And when she says, yeah, that we want to make spark plugs a big priority for the next five years, they all go, yeah, they still do that, right? They scramble to find their local spark plugs in there.

[Mike Bird]

And I think, I think there's lots of like American examples and examples elsewhere in sectors where people said, oh, it's too competitive and no one will ever achieve it. Uber's a good example. Like people said this would never work. It does work, right? So there is a scale that you can build where I think you develop a value even in a market with that's really competitive and really sort of low entry costs. But you won't do that. If every other. Imagine a world with Uber, but where every other rideshare company was aggressively subsidized. Every time Uber got above a certain market cap, then, yeah, you wouldn't have Uber at a certain market cap.

[Tracy Alloway]

I'm really curious because again, the book goes through. It's not just China. It goes through all sorts of land models. But what was the most interesting one that you looked at? Not only does it go across different ways that different countries treat land across the world, it also goes across time, like 3,000 years worth of human history.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah. I should emphasize to anyone listening, I was really interested in the China stuff, but it's not a. Not a China. But the two most interesting to me, one of which, because I live there and I think it's the most unusual and fascinating real estate system in the world, is Singapore, which has defied in many ways a lot of the limitations that other countries have seen. And one of the first parts of the book, which is like Colonial America, where there were all of these efforts to turn land into money. Right. These colonists get to a place where they have essentially to them, infinity land. It just keeps going on and on. They don't know where it stops. It seems to be relatively fertile and good and more people turn up, but have shortages in cash and labor and everything else. And there's all of these efforts to turn land into money with public and private land banking projects. I found all of that, like, absolutely fascinating. It's not actually something I knew very well before starting to research the book. Yeah. So Singapore and Colonial America.

[Joe Weisenthal]

What is it about Singapore that makes it. I actually, I don't know why I sort of assumed they did the same 99 year land.

[Mike Bird]

Reason that this is the most interesting thing. They start off with all the inherited things that Hong Kong starts off with. Up until the middle of the 20th century, the city to run on very, very similar lines. Hong Kong goes off in one direction and Singapore goes off in another. And the Singaporean direction is basically, how do you maximize home ownership permanently? How do you have a sustainable model for making sure people can still afford to come in? So what they have is this bizarre public private system. I say bizarre. It's very impressive, where the government owns most of the city's land, not all of it like in Hong Kong, but most of it. And they have the Housing and Development Board that builds housing estates. They then sell the units in the housing estates to Singaporean citizens. You can only own one, you can't own multiple and rent them out. There are restrictions on how long you can hold them before there's an internal market. But you can only sell them to Singaporean citizens and permanent residents. The amount of building is done to make sure that everyone can afford.

[Joe Weisenthal]

So they've really divorced usage from speculation.

[Mike Bird]

Totally. They've divorced usage from speculation. And a place that I think most people think of as very capitalistic, free market, low tax has basically decided this asset class. Land and real estate, this is something different. Yeah, we're doing a different thing with this, where, you know, the normal forces. Singapore, there's so much international money center of like capital and trade flows is rich.

[Joe Weisenthal]

They do have commercial REITs, though, in Singapore.

[Mike Bird]

They do.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I remember this because when I was in Singapore, I saw the ticker symbol on the side of a few buildings. It's like you could invest in this, but anyway. Yeah, but commercial real estate, a little.

[Mike Bird]

Bit different, but the residential real estate, and they've done this in again, they decided land was different. They have a thing called the Land Acquisition act, which really allowed them to strip a lot of people of their land, extraordinarily low prices through the sort of 60s, 70s, 80s, and it's allowed them to do something very, very different. I don't know whether most countries can sustain the idea that capitalism works for everything but not land, and we're just going to be. One Singaporean senior politician describes it to me as piracy. What they did in the 70s and 80s, pennies on the dollar, basically demanding people hand over this land. So it could be housing for Singaporeans, but it has worked very well.

[Tracy Alloway]

Okay, so China probably cannot pursue the Singaporean model at this point. Right. But why can't they institute a stronger social safety net so that the burden of saving for retirement, for health emergencies, things like that, doesn't always necessarily fall on the citizens and therefore they have to invest in highly speculative assets.

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, they should, is the answer. There seems to be huge political opposition to doing this at the top of the Chinese Communist Party. And it's bizarre again, because you talk to someone like Richard Koo and he'll give you. He'll explain why if you don't do this, this is the consequence, right? Japan is the consequence. Long term stagnation, it's going to be really difficult. They should do all that and maybe they will be sort of drummed into it eventually. Because I think the alternative is both stagnation and lots and lots of trade friction with the people you're exporting to, as we've already seen.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Right. Because it's not just the U.S. is it? Everyone's sort of no. 1. There got to be a lot of countries that are not thrilled.

[Mike Bird]

No one's totally happy with it. It's, it's a weird, it's a weird mix because for some countries it's like if you're not going to make some of these items, right, if you're a country that's simply not going to make EVs, then why should you care about getting the really cheap EVs? But everyone's got something to be upset about. In Southeast Asia, it was always steel when I was there. Everyone wants to have their own local steel sector and they don't like the Chinese dumping of steel in Indonesia. They don't want like cheap Chinese direct to consumer merchandise coming in because it messes with their small and medium sized businesses. I guess for most of these countries the difficulty is do you want to pick a fight with the Chinese government? It's not an obvious question like it is in the U.S. i guess I.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Just have one last question and you know, the sort of Singapore example is what reminded me like land is weird. Like the idea that you could have a capitalist system except for residential land. A lot of people actually kind of think that new here, what is the Georgists, right. And they think like no land is special and we need to have these like special taxes on ownership. And yeah, we love free markets. But again, maybe because there's only so much land, they're not making much more of it, et cetera. Maybe there really is something to do. It's sort of unfair. Like I get born in the year 1980 and I already, a bunch of people already own the land around me, which doesn't really seem fair. It's like I was just born, where's my chance? Like we're never going to go to the pure Singapore model. But are there things that we could do with the tax system that would like sort of further hammer home the idea that residential land is for living?

[Mike Bird]

Yeah, I think there's dozens of different things you could do. But I mean one of the big things is that the legacy of Henry George and the politicians in municipal America that really loved Henry George is that America has relatively high property taxes anyway. You can do all sorts of things with property taxes to lean more of the value on the land rather than the structures. Right. Lots of states, lots of cities have done this. I think it's going to be increasingly important in the future because what you're going to get is increasingly people inheriting homes from their parents when you can't afford them. And then that main store of wealth is about whether your parents decided to buy in the right place at the right time. I talk to a lot of 70 year olds who'll be like, well, I picked my two bedroom flat in 1973 and yes, I bought it for three and a half dollars, but it's mine. That's going to be a lot less tenable, I think, when it's handed down wealth. So, yeah, there's loads of. Loads of things. And Henry George is in the book. The political consequences have George's and fell apart in there too.

[Tracy Alloway]

All right, Mike Bird, thank you so much for coming on. All thoughts, Congrats on the book.

[Mike Bird]

Thank you very much for having me.

[Tracy Alloway]

Joe. That was really great. And I genuinely. The book is great.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah. I love talking to Mike. Once again, I'm just like, hasn't he been like on the Internet as much as we have?

[Mike Bird]

How do you.

[Joe Weisenthal]

How did you write a book at this time?

[Tracy Alloway]

I have no idea.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I don't understand how anyone writes a book, especially a very serious book on a very big meaty topic. But I just really like.

[Tracy Alloway]

While tweeting constantly.

[Joe Weisenthal]

While tweeting. He tweets a lot.

[Tracy Alloway]

Speaking of productivity. Yeah.

[Joe Weisenthal]

It's like, it would be one thing if he were never online. He's online as much as I am.

[Tracy Alloway]

Okay. You know you asked that question about whether or not Chinese cities are actually futuristic.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah.

[Tracy Alloway]

I have an anecdote on this point. I think I might have said it before, but China is the place where I went to both the most impressive bathroom ever in like a highly futuristic luxury shopping mall in Beijing and also the worst one ever in my entire life, which was in a rural. A rural.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Please describe it in vivid detail, please. No, I won't.

[Tracy Alloway]

But it was basically a hole in the ground. Right. It was terrible.

[Joe Weisenthal]

China, it's a land of contradictions.

[Tracy Alloway]

Thank you. Thank you for highlighting the cliche.

[Joe Weisenthal]

No, I thought, like, it. It always did seem very interesting. It still does that. Like there is so much speculation that happens in China and I always found that to be a little weird. I also just find the idea of like buying a property, but it's actually really, you're not buying it. You're only buying the property for like, 75 years to be a little weird. But on the other hand, that kind.

[Tracy Alloway]

Of exists in New York.

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah, yeah. And in the US like, look, we pay property taxes in perpetuity, which means to some extent. Extent. That when you own something, you are paying a permanent rent to use it. And if you stop paying that rent, then you could theoretically lose it. So maybe it's less weird than I thought it is. Actually, we should do more on Singapore specifically. Like, but also, you know, like, I'm not sure to your point in the very beginning whether people actually want the divorce between usage and speculation.

[Tracy Alloway]

Yeah.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I just think that for several of the last decades, people didn't have to choose. You got to live in it and you made a lot of money.

[Tracy Alloway]

I think it's very hard to get off the train once it's kind of rolling. Right. And that's the problem that we're seeing in China. And now they're trying to walk this very fine tightrope where it's like, we don't want to make everyone incredibly poor, but we also want to depress housing and the importance of housing in our economy in order to boost manufacturing and productivity.

[Joe Weisenthal]

This is why, again, my proposal, affordable housing for one year and then it goes back to being really expensive.

[Tracy Alloway]

All right, well, you can suggest that, Joe, when we go to Beijing.

[Joe Weisenthal]

I'll run on that. I'll run on that. I'll run on that platform.

[Tracy Alloway]

All right. Shall we leave it there?

[Joe Weisenthal]

Yeah.

[Tracy Alloway]

This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

[Joe Weisenthal]

And I'm Jill Weisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart. Follow our guest Mike Bird. He's at birdieword. And check out his book the Land Trap, A new history of the world's oldest Asset class. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmenarmen, Dashiell Bennett at dashbot, and Kel Brooks at Kell Brooks. For more Odd Lots content, go to bloomberg.com oddlots with the Daily newsletter and you can chat about all of these topics 24. 7 in our Discord Discord GG oddlots.

[Tracy Alloway]

And if you enjoy Odd Lots, if you like it when we talk about the world's oldest asset, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg Channel on Apple podcast and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening. Make their holiday unforgettable with a gift that says it all from Pandora Jewelry. A gift that tells a story and shows you know theirs that doesn't just sparkle but speaks. From new festive charms to forever rings and personal engravings, this season, give a gift that's perfectly theirs. Whether you're shopping for a shiny surprise for your significant other, matching bracelets to celebrate your friendship, or a heartfelt gift for a family member, say more this holiday season with Pandora. Shop [e-mail] or visit your closest Pandora store.

[Advertisement/Announcer]

Saks Off 5th is revealing the season's most wanted holiday steals. Whether you're gifting someone on your list or treating yourself to a designer score, find deals on McQueen, Valentino, Versace, Stuart Weitzman and more at up to 70% off every day, outshine at every event and outsmart your budget. From shimmer ready party looks to luxe layers and cozy giftable Accessories, Saks off 5th is your secret source for celebrating in style. Your holiday shopping mission starts [e-mail] or a Saks off 5th store near you.

[Tracy Alloway]

We know no one's journey is the same. That's why Delta SkyMiles moves with you. From earning miles on reloads for coffee runs, shopping and things you do every day to connecting you to new experiences, a SkyMiles membership fits into your lifestyle, letting you do more of what makes you you. It's more than travel. It's the membership that flies, dines, streams, rides and arrives with you. Because when you have a membership that's as unique as you are, there's no telling where your journey will take you next. Learn [e-mail] SkyMiles.