Loading summary
Emily Grace
November 20, 1998.
Stan Love
10. 9, 8.
Emily Grace
A new era in human spaceflight began with the launch of the first module of the International Space Station.
Stan Love
Main engines start. Six engines up and running.
Emily Grace
After decades of planning and international cooperation, this orbiting laboratory lifted off from Kazakhstan, embarking on a journey that would forever change our understanding of life beyond Earth.
Stan Love
And liftoff. Liftoff of the Proton rocket on the Zarya control module. The Interface International Space Station is underway.
Interviewer
Over the course of the next two.
Emily Grace
Years, additional modules from the United States, Russia, Japan and Europe would gradually be assembled in orbit piece by piece until the ISS took its final form.
Stan Love
We wanted to build a world class laboratory in orbit.
Emily Grace
A football field sized research platform circling the globe every 90 minutes.
Stan Love
We are screaming around the earth at 17,500 miles per hour and we have to go that fast because otherwise we would just fall down and hit the the Earth.
Emily Grace
For the past two decades, the International Space Station has served as humanity's outpost in the void. Conducting groundbreaking experiments, testing technologies for future deep space exploration and providing a unique vantage point to study our planet.
Stan Love
There's a lot of science that can be done up there that cannot be done on the ground because of the complicating effects of gravity.
Emily Grace
But now it's time in orbit is coming to an end. As the ISS begins to approach the end of its operational lifespan, plans are are already underway to bring it down safely.
Stan Love
We don't want to drop a space station on their heads, so that means you have to deorbit it in a controlled fashion.
Emily Grace
Today we're going off the radar with NASA astronaut Stan Love. Stan was part of the team that got the ISS up in orbit and will play a crucial role in bringing it back to Earth. We'll discuss the important work that's been done over the past 25 years on the ISS and why it's time for the mission to end. We'll also look ahead to the next steps in the Artemis program as NASA transitions out of low Earth orbit and into deep space.
Stan Love
The future belongs to the countries that embrace science and technology. That has been true for hundreds of years and it will only be true in the future.
Emily Grace
I'm meteorologist Emily Grace and you're listening to off the Radar, a production of the National Weather Desk. On the show we dig deep into topics about weather, climate, the ocean, space and much more. Our goal is to help you better understand the weather and to love it as much as we do.
Advertiser
Why get all your holiday decorations delivered through Instacart? Because maybe you only bought two wreaths? But have 12 windows. Or maybe your toddler got very eager with the Advent calendar. Or maybe the inflatable snowman didn't make it through the snowstorm. Or maybe the twinkle lights aren't twinkling. Whatever the reason, this season Instacart's here for hosts and their whole holiday haul. Get decorations from the Home Depot CVS and more through Instacart and enjoy free delivery on your first three orders. Service fees and terms apply.
Emily Grace
Hey, prime members, have you heard?
Advertiser
You can listen to your favorite podcasts ad free.
Emily Grace
Good news. With Amazon Music, you have access to the largest catalog of ad free top podcasts included with your prime membership. To start listening, download the Amazon music app for free or go to Amazon.com ad free podcast, that's Amazon.com ad freepodcast to catch up on the latest episodes without the ads.
Interviewer
Okay, so you are a NASA astronaut. You have been for decades. So I can't wait to dig in and talk to you a little bit about your history and the future of what's going on with space travel. Can you take me back to the beginning of kind of how you became an astronaut? And I was looking at your history and I'm doing the math right. You were alive for the first walk on the moon.
Stan Love
Correct.
Interviewer
But you were probably.
Stan Love
I was four.
Advertiser
Very young.
Interviewer
Do you have any memory of it? It?
Stan Love
I. I do, actually. Not. Not the first moonwalk, but one of my earliest memories is from first grade when I was six, watching, I think it was the Apollo 16 splashdown. You know, they wheeled in the big black and white TV on the tall cart so we could all watch it, and that was pretty cool. And then 30 years later, the commander of that mission was interviewing me for the position of astronaut. So John Young was on that flight, and he was the chief of the selection board on at least one of my interview years.
Interviewer
Wow. Surreal. Okay, so was that the inspiration? Did you always have this goal of becoming an astronaut, or is it something that you just kind of wound up in?
Stan Love
Neither. I loved science fiction as a kid. I grew up on the original Star Trek. I ate up science fiction novels, and it always just seemed like something fun. And so in school I studied physics and astronomy because I thought space was cool, and then had a little bit of aeronaut, a little bit of aeronautical engineering. And as long as what I was doing was consistent with what they were looking for for astronauts, I sent in an application and did that for seven years and interviewed three times. And finally, I think the selection board got tired of me, so I figured the best way to get rid of me from the selection standpoint would be to hire me.
Interviewer
Okay, so you became an astronaut in what year?
Stan Love
1998.
Interviewer
Big time for space travel. So that was kind of the time of the space shuttles, right?
Stan Love
Yeah, this is space shuttle. And that year we launched the first part of the space station, which is.
Interviewer
What today's episode is all about, is the lifeline of the International Space Station. So it's funny because I guess I'm young enough that I didn't really realize that it wasn't always there.
Stan Love
Nope.
Interviewer
I was a grownup before I realized this thing came up. When I was in high school, my.
Stan Love
Classmates and I built that thing.
Interviewer
It's amazing. Was this the first time there was a space station?
Stan Love
No, for heaven's sake. The Russians have had space stations for many decades. All through the 70s they were flying Salyuts and then Mir. And in the seventies the United States had Skylab for a little over a year, I think. So there have been many space stations, but nothing nearly as big and as complicated as the International Space Station.
Interviewer
Okay, so I'm guessing it went up in pieces?
Stan Love
Absolutely. It weighs 450 tons or something like that. And even Elon can't launch that in one piece.
Interviewer
How many times have you used that line?
Stan Love
This is the first.
Interviewer
Oh, yes. Okay. So what was the goal here when this project started? What was the hope for the International Space Station?
Stan Love
Well, we wanted to build a sort of world class laboratory in orbit. There's a lot of science that can be done up there that cannot be done on the ground because of the complicating effects of gravity. And we also wanted to spend lots of time with lots of people in space to learn everything we need to know so that we can go deeper into space, back to the moon and then onto Mars and beyond. And so we needed a stable, capable laboratory in low earth orbit. And that's what the International Space Station is. And then of course, from, you know, a bigger picture. Having most of the space faring nations on Earth working together in space is also very helpful.
Interviewer
Helpful, but also that has to be complicated. I mean, just the dynamics of all these different countries coming together and getting anything done, let alone getting different pieces of equipment up in space. So what was that process like? How did you decide who's in charge of what? The cutest one, I think is Canada with the. They just had the arm, right?
Stan Love
They do, but let's not call them cute. All the partners contribute as they are.
Emily Grace
Okay.
Stan Love
Of course, each country has a control center for their parts of the space station. And those control centers are in communication with one another all the time. And we talk as we need to and we solve problems together and we generally make it work.
Interviewer
How many languages do you speak?
Stan Love
I speak English, Russian and German.
Interviewer
I'm guessing that's probably pretty important when it comes to doing this.
Stan Love
You have to be able to speak some Russian to, to fly on the space station. I already spoke German. I lived in Germany for a year. My family lived in Germany when I was a kid and I still remember.
Interviewer
Much of my German backing up to. When you first started going to space and you were training to be an astronaut, there's gotta be like a physical aspect to this, right? Where you have this, you have the PhD, you have the knowledge. But then training physically to be an astronaut, what is that like?
Stan Love
Not really well scoped or written down or anything like that. There's a, there's a medical exam you have to pass each year. But there's this widespread public perception that astronauts are all perfect physical specimens and decathletes and everything. You know, I think it's because we.
Interviewer
Always see them like jogging on treadmills in the iss.
Stan Love
Yeah, and when you go to space station, it behooves you to exercise like a crazy person because otherwise your body is going, body, muscles, bones are going to waste away and when you come back to Earth you'll be a jellyfish and we don't want that. So yes, they're always on the treadmill. But you know, Sunny Williams famously ran the Boston marathon on the ISS, ran 26 miles on the treadmill on the day of the marathon. Uh, but not everybody does that, frankly. There are maybe a couple of astronauts who, who we should see in the gym a little more often.
Interviewer
Okay, so what's it like going to space the first time you went up, broke through the atmosphere, what was that experience?
Stan Love
Well, the launch is very impressive. There's a lot of roaring and shaking and your seat pushes you pretty hard in the back and you realize you're definitely going somewhere in a great big hurry. That's about an eight minute ride on the rocket to orbit, depending on which rocket you ride to orbit. And then when you get there and the engine's shut off and you're floating in your straps, your thought, first thought is, wow, I'm floating in space. And your second thought is I have to get to work right now because we had a lot to do and only barely enough time to do it all in.
Interviewer
Were you sick?
Stan Love
I wasn't I wasn't sick. I like to say I was. I did not get sick in space because I had the right stuff. 25 milligrams of phenergan.
Interviewer
What is that? It's like an anti nausea.
Stan Love
It's an anti nausea medication. So yeah, you can, you can, you can take medication against space sickness. About a third of people when they get to space feel bad enough that they throw up. About another third get sort of stomach awareness. You know, like if you're reading in the car and someone else is driving and your stomach, you feel a little queasy and you kind of don't want to move your head around a lot and then the other third are probably not telling the truth.
Interviewer
I just got your reference there. The right stuff. That's not. I didn't see the movies.
Stan Love
You should see it. It's. It's a funny movie.
Interviewer
Is it okay?
Stan Love
Yeah.
Interviewer
We're gonna go back to movies in just a minute. But I want to talk about your role too in getting stuff up there. So how does that work? Do. Was the mission that you were on, was that part of taking some of those things up to put the International Space Station together?
Stan Love
Yes, we were one of the space station assembly flights. So the space shuttle looks like, you know, delta winged airplane. And the most of the body of that airplane is a big cargo bay that you can put big stuff in. So we had a canister shaped laboratory about the size of an rv. That was the European Space Agency's Columbus Laboratory. It was their big hardware contribution to the space station. So we had that in our payload bay. We took it up to the station, we docked with the station, then used the station's robot arm to pick that module up out of the payload bay, swing it around, put it over a docking port where a ring of powered bolts drove to attach it to the space station. And then we could open up the hatches and have a new laboratory on the space station.
Interviewer
Were you there when the hatches opened?
Stan Love
No, I was busy with other things. I was a spacewalker and main shuttle robotic arm operator. So I wasn't there when the hatches open. Interestingly, you have to wear goggles when you open up a new module because all the little aluminum chips left over from manufacturing it, even though they try to keep it clean, once that stuff gets up into space, it starts floating around the cabin. And you don't want to inhale that or get it in your eye. So until the we. Until we've run the ventilators and the, with the screens on the. On the ventilation inlets for a day or so. You have to wear goggles when you're in a new module.
Interviewer
Okay, so if you're spacewalking, can you tell me what that experience is like?
Stan Love
It's really unnatural. You're crawling around on the outside of this gigantic metal object with handrails that you can climb on. You're very sensitive about making sure your safety tether is where it's where it ought to be. You have a power tool. Everything in the suit is very hard to operate. It's. It's pressurized, which means that just closing your hand around a tool or around a handrail is like trying to squeeze a tennis ball. So it can be physically very challenging, even though there's no gravity. And then most of the time, you've got, you know, a station wall right in front of your face. And only occasionally do you get to look off to the side and go, wow, here I am. There's the Earth.
Interviewer
It was that, like. What's it like looking at the Earth from that vantage point?
Stan Love
Oh, it's awesome. Any. Any time an astronaut has a spare moment, they're looking out the windows and at the Earth. The Earth is speaking as an astronomer. The Earth is the most interesting thing in space.
Interviewer
Okay, so how long were you up there?
Stan Love
Two weeks.
Interviewer
And what's life like up there?
Stan Love
It's a lot of work. You pause briefly for a meal now and then you try to get some sleep at night. It's an unfamiliar environment, and, you know, there's a lot of risk. So not everybody sleeps super well. And then you get up in the morning and go back to work.
Interviewer
Did you have trouble sleeping?
Stan Love
Yeah, and most people do. Yeah, but that. It's for the long duration. Crew members who are on space station for six months, they can kind of get used to it. And I think they sleep pretty well at night. But it was very common for shuttle crew members to not sleep super well.
Interviewer
Okay, you mentioned science that you can't do on Earth because of gravity. Can you give me some examples?
Stan Love
Fluid flow is really different in space. Flames are incredibly different in space. We have a little. A little combustion lab, very well isolated from the cabin where we can light things on fire and see how flames work. When there's no buoyant force taking hot gas away from the flame, then, of course, we can observe the Earth in many ways. There are Earth observing instruments. There are space observing instruments. There's a giant cosmic ray detector on the space station, looking for antimatter and other stuff coming in from distant Space. I think at any given time there are probably two to 300 different investigations going on on the space station. And then much of the science has to do with the people themselves. We study how our bones and muscles change, how our eyes change, how our sense of balance changes when we are not under the influence of grav. And all these things are important for us to get a handle on before we send people off to Mars, which would be about a three year trip.
Interviewer
So has anything come out of this that's been really surprising or anything that NASA's been like, I'm so glad we know that now, before we did do.
Stan Love
This, well, I mentioned eyes. It turns out that in space, most people's cerebrospinal fluid, so this is the watery fluid that bathes your brain and spinal cord. The pressure in that goes way up, which is very unusual on Earth. And it can actually get so bad that it, the pressure in your eyeball also goes up and it can actually damage your eyesight and you'd hate to land on Mars and not be able to read your checklist. So we have a lot of investigations going on trying to understand why that happens. It's not known. And then what can be done about it.
Interviewer
Interesting. So have people who have been on the ISS for months, have they had vision problems?
Stan Love
Some of them have come back with, with changed vision, yes. And of course everybody's muscles and bones get weak up there. Although the weightlifting equipment we have up there is pretty good. And so at first we had people showing a lot of muscle and bone loss. But these days our crews are coming back pretty healthy. In fact, Crew 8 just landed last week. I saw two of them in the gym today and they look great.
Interviewer
When you did come back and land, was it hard to adjust to gravity?
Stan Love
Yeah, it is as disorienting coming back to gravity as it was getting used to zero gravity. And it kind of makes your head spin. The first day it's kind of like, it's kind of like, I'm told it would be like if you had six beers. I have no personal experience with this, of course myself. That's landing day. And then the day after landing it's like three beers, and the day after that it's like one beer. And then after that they let you drive your car.
Interviewer
So speaking of having fun, I'm guessing that emotionally, mentally, especially for people who are up there longer, it can be a, like a tough place to live. So I'm curious, it is mentally how that works.
Stan Love
The shower is unsatisfactory, the Toilet is unsatisfactory. The food's okay and you get to choose your favorite food, but you still get tired of it. But then you can trade with your crewmates.
Interviewer
What's your favorite food?
Stan Love
My favorite space food was creamed spinach. I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole on Earth, but for some reason in space it tastes really good. Your, your sense of taste does change when you get up in, into zero g, partly because actually things taste really bland. There's a system in your body that's always pumping fluid up from your legs up to your upper body. Keeps your ankles from swelling most of the time. And then when you get to space, that system keeps working so it pumps all the fluid up into your upper body and your head kind of gets stuffy, like you got a bad cold and you can't taste your food very well. So they had to add a lot of salt to the food and then they figured out that's, that's too much salt. So then they took the salt out and added real spices. And then if you ever see a photograph of astronauts eating around the table on the space station, you will see several different types of hot sauce. It is all about the hot sauce.
Interviewer
They put it on everything, adding flavor. That makes sense.
Stan Love
Yeah.
Interviewer
Has any, has there been incidents of people kind of like losing it mentally when they've been up there for long periods of time?
Stan Love
Yeah. No. Very popular in the movies. No, we, we select our astronauts carefully and if you look like the kind of person who's going to lose it when things get tough, you don't get hired. And we train them carefully and among other things, we train them so that if they are having a bad day, they know they can talk to their crewmates, they can talk to their flight surgeon on the radio, they can have a video conference with their family. So we put a lot of thought into that. But that thought begins with selecting people who are even, even keeled self aware and have the tools to not lose it.
Interviewer
Okay, so we were talking about being of, in space and experiments and science that's going on up there, which, you know, we are a weather show. So I'm curious, are there any type of weather science experiments going on?
Stan Love
Yeah, I think the station has a scatterometer on it that bounces radar off the ocean surface from which we get wind speed. And then every time there's a volcanic eruption or a hurricane, the crew's busy with their cameras taking pictures of it.
Interviewer
Heck yeah. We love those pictures.
Stan Love
Yeah, yeah. I think there was a Volcanic eruption in Kamchatka 15 years or so ago. And it was cloudy and there's not that many observers in Kamchatka. And I think the first pictures of that came from the International Space Station. They flew right over it just as the plume was bursting through the cloud layer. And you can see this big brown lump growing up out of the white clouds.
Interviewer
Wow, interesting. Okay, so throughout the day on the iss, what are the different roles that people have? Is there like housekeeping stuff along with the experiments that are going on? What is going on?
Stan Love
So the systems on the station, the power supply, the air fans, the pumps, the data system that's controlling the station, that's largely run by mission control remotely. So the things we have the crew doing are the things that only the crew can do because they have hands and eyes up there. So their first order business is they have to keep themselves healthy. So they're exercising two and a half hours every day. They get a break at the beginning of the day and to the end of the day to have decent meals. There's often not time for lunch. You have to kind of grab a granola bar or something on the go for lunch. And then there's some medical data takes on them to make sure that we can, we can monitor their health and make sure that they're staying healthy. So job number one, stay healthy. Job number two, make sure the station's healthy. When something breaks and we have to, you know, change a pump or change a hose or something like that, and only the crew can do that. They, that's what they do. And then after that, almost all of their time available work, time left in the day is doing these science experiments. Now they don't, don't normally design the experiment, but they, you know, push the start button or they change out the sample canister and things like that. Then there are special events. If there's a spacewalk, they'll spend a couple of weeks getting everything ready for the spacewalk, learning what they have to do, getting the suits ready, getting the tools ready, then going out the hatch, doing the job, and then coming back in and cleaning up. When a cargo ship comes up, they have to unload all the cargo, find places to put it, and then they usually reload it. Depending on which type of cargo ship, if it's going to be one of the ones that burns up in the atmosphere at the end of its mission, they load it up with trash and then that undocks and goes and burns up in the atmosphere, or if it's a return cargo Ship, then they'll send, you know, scientific samples, worn out equipment, things that have to go back to the Earth for some reason or other. Go back on those ships.
Interviewer
Can you explain? Because I, you know, something I used to not understand was I thought the ISS was just like floating out in space. But the reason for the lack of gravity on the International Space Station and just how close it actually is to Earth.
Stan Love
Yes. So, yeah, if the Earth is this big, the station is about that high above it. So it is just above the top of the atmosphere. The Earth is a ball about 8,000 miles in diameter and the station is about 250 miles up. And if you built a tower 250 miles tall and stood on the top of it, you need to be in a spacesuit because there's no air up there and you would perish immediately. If you didn't have a suit on, you would feel something like 94% of your normal body weight. You would. There's oodles of gravity where the space station is, but the station doesn't feel it because it is in free fall. It is falling toward the center of the Earth just as fast as it can, but it doesn't hit the atmosphere or the ground because it's going forward so fast that by the time it has fallen down to where the ground is, the curvature of the Earth has made the ground go away from it. So it's always trying to fall down, but it's over the horizon before it can hit and it just keeps falling around the Earth. That's, that's what it really means to be in orbit. So we're not very high up and we're not just floating around in empty space. We are screaming around the Earth at 17,500 miles per hour, and we have to go that fast because otherwise we would just fall down and hit the Earth. But this way we're going so fast that the curvature of our path going down to hit the Earth matches the curvature of the Earth itself, and we never hit.
Interviewer
That's a crazy concept to grasp, I think, unless you're knowledgeable on the top.
Stan Love
I have found no better way to explain it to somebody who doesn't understand it. You're going so fast that you're over the horizon before you hit the ground. That, that seems to resonate with most people.
Interviewer
You told me why it was going up, but can you tell me why the life of the ISS is now coming to an end?
Stan Love
For the same reason the life of anything comes to an end, it gets old and worn out. The Structure has a finite lifetime. Any piece of metal, you know, you take a paperclip and you bend it back and forth and it'll break. That is true of anything made out of metal, including an international space station. And the space station is always getting bent and flexed and stuff like that, partly from gravity gradient docking vehicles. The crew members exercising is actually a big deal for a space station lifetime.
Interviewer
How does that work?
Stan Love
Interestingly enough, have you ever seen the video of the Tacoma Narrows bridge?
Interviewer
Oh, yeah.
Stan Love
Galloping Gertie. Okay, so that happened because the bridge, unbeknownst to its building builders, had a resonant frequency that happened to be exactly the same as a subsonic note in the wind blowing through that channel. And it excited. That fundamental mode in the bridge fell apart. It turns out that the fundamental mode for the space station's great big truss with the solar arrays on it is exactly the same as the frequency of a crew member pounding on the treadmill as they're running.
Interviewer
How did you find this out?
Stan Love
We found it out when we put it up there and put a crew on it and said, oh, look at that. So next time we'll know better. But anyway, and there are actually parts of the station's pressure hull that are already showing cracks. There's. There's a lot of concern right now for some cracks on a part of the Russian segment. And we don't even want to have the hatches open when they've got that section connected to the rest of station because it's fairly serious. So anything, any machine, any creature, star, a planet has a finite lifetime, and we cannot build things that last forever. So. And plus, you know, the pumps get old, the computers get old, glitches start appearing, and eventually it is going to be too expensive to maintain for what we get out of it. And its capabilities are going to start to decrease and it will become unsafe for people to live there. And we, we do not want to put people on a machine that's so old that it's not safe.
Interviewer
Can you tell me what it coming down looks like and what the timeline on that is?
Stan Love
Okay, so 2031, I think, is when we were planning to deorb at the station. Now, now it costs a lot of money and still more or less working. So we might extend past that, but that there are international agreements that go with that. We also want to start building a new space station in orbit around the moon. And if we're spending all our money on the old one, then we can't afford the new one. So there's Lots and lots of discussions that happen way, way above my pay grade. They're going to happen to determine when the space station actually comes down. Now, the problem is it weighs 400 tons. Back in the 70s we had Skylab. And 15 or so years after we were done with it, its orbit decayed and it re entered the atmosphere and bit of it fell on Australia. And Australia was understandably not super excited about that. The space station is much larger. A lot of its pieces might survive atmospheric grantee. And when an object in orbit start, has its orbit start to decay, it is literally not possible to determine where exactly it's going to come down. It descends into the atmosphere, the atmosphere gets a little thicker, that puts drag force on it, that makes it descend quicker and so forth. And that happens over the course of many orbits and then finally over just one orbit. And there is no way to predict that. And it means basically anywhere on Earth between the northernmost and southernmost extents of the space station's orbit, which is at 51 degrees latitude, which includes like 90% of the population of the Earth, could be a target. So we, we don't want to drop a space station on their heads. So that means you have to deorbit it in a controlled fashion. And that means you have to be able to slow it down so that it enters the atmosphere decisively instead of just kind of gradually gradually skimming in. You need it to come down at a good angle. And for a station that weighs 400 tons, that means you need a fairly powerful rocket to slow it down quickly over the course of minutes so that it will dip down into the atmosphere steeply and atmospheric drag will cause it to heat up. Eventually it will fall apart. All the individual elements will enter separately and we want to put them in the South Pacific Ocean where nobody lives. And there's precedent for that. When the Russians brought the MIR station down, there's great video of from Tonga showing these giant fireballs coming across their sky. Now, nothing landed on Tonga because everything went way down range before it actually hit the ocean. But that's where we want to put it. And we have, I think, just let the contract to build the rocket that will go up dock with the space station with still a full load of propellant on board. So then fire that rocket and bring the station down in a controlled fashion so we can drop it, you know, over the, over the Pacific Ocean, Central Pacific, 50 degrees south latitude. That's actually near the point in the ocean that is furthest from any land. And not much shipping goes through There. So it's the safest place on Earth to bring the space station down. And then if any of your subscribers are HP Lovecraft fans, it's also the location of the sunken city of Raya. So we give all our garbage in our. In our dead stations to Cthulhu.
Interviewer
Wow. Okay, so this is all coming down at once. I guess I thought it was just going to be, like, piece by piece.
Stan Love
By piece, but the station was hard to put together. Taking it apart would be just as hard. All those modules are connected not just by a powered bolt interface, but most of them have lots and lots of cables and hoses connecting them together. And you would have to disconnect. It would be hundreds of spacewalks and, you know, dozens of flights to the station. If we started that work now, we would not be done in 2030.
Interviewer
So when it comes down, is it going to be a slow descent, like with a balloon?
Stan Love
No, it's going to hit the atmosphere at 8 kilometers per second, just like everything that comes back from low Earth orbit. And it will break up, and the sections will burn up largely, and everything made out of steel or titanium will probably hit the ground. Aluminum, glass, plastic, all gets burned up.
Interviewer
So what does that look like when it hits the ocean? Is there, like a giant wave, or is it in so many pieces? No, no.
Stan Love
All the cosmic energy, all the speed energy gets used in coming through the atmosphere. So it'll look like a giant meteor fireball when it comes through. And then when it breaks up, it will look like a bunch of giant meteor fireballs. All of its orbital speed will be gone. And when the pieces, the small, roughed over pieces, hit the ocean, they will hit at the same speed that they would if they were just dropped from an airplane.
Interviewer
Okay. And then do they get scooped up? Is there an effort to, like, gather these up, or are they.
Stan Love
Nope, nope. Burned up. Burned up. Titanium doesn't have a lot of value, and trying to scrape the stuff off the ocean floor would be very expensive.
Interviewer
Okay, okay. And environmental impacts.
Stan Love
Steel and titanium, not so bad. And the stuff that burns up, burns up high in the atmosphere and in a plasma environment that basically separates all of the atoms from one another, everything ends up basically back in its fundamental elements. Heavier atoms will settle down through the atmosphere over. Over a wide area. It's. I. I would expect no environmental impacts from that whatsoever.
Interviewer
This is kind of wild. Surely NASA is going to keep some pieces for some museum somewhere.
Stan Love
Only pieces that we bring down from the station before we deorbit or deorbit. It but anything on board the station when it goes into the atmosphere is forfeit. We're not getting any of that stuff back.
Interviewer
All right. Okay, so the next steps. Let's talk about what's next for NASA after ISS comes down. You mentioned perhaps a space station around the moon. Is that. What does that look like? Is it similar to what we've had here orbiting around Earth?
Stan Love
It's going to look like a very small space station. So it'll have solar arrays and some cylindrical habitable modules and vehicles will dock to it. And it's like a mini space station, but emphasis on the mini.
Emily Grace
Okay.
Interviewer
And what's the point of it?
Stan Love
It is a transit hub that allows us to take landers and crew vehicles and switch cargo and switch propellant around in orbit around the moon. So it's like the transit hub that allows us access the surface of the moon.
Interviewer
You're heavily involved in Artemis. Correct. Can you tell me what your role is and like, what, what next steps are? Because some of this stuff that sounds very futuristic is not that far in the future, Right.
Stan Love
I've been pretty much up to my eyebrows in Artemis for the last 20 years. I have been working on the Orion vehicle since it was a winged space plane in 2004. Now it's a capsule and it's flown a good test flight. I was there at the creation of the SLS heavy lift rocket that takes Orion into space and was the Astronaut Office representative on the design team for that. For many years. I was the lead capcom for Artemis 1, which was super easy. We didn't have a crew on board, so I didn't have any calls to make. Got through the whole mission without making a single bad call. I'm also lead for Artemis 2, and there will be bad calls because I'm actually going to be making calls. And then separately for the last seven years, I've been working in the Astronaut Office's rapid Prototyping laboratory. We design and test cockpit displays and controls for future spacecraft. And we built the Orion user interface to the extent where we designed everything and then handed over to Lockheed and they put it together sort of the way we said, and that's what's flying. I am in charge of the gateway stations user interface, which is going to be on a laptop computer, much like the current space station uses a laptop computer for the crew to control it. I am also working on displays and controls for future spacesuits, rovers, habit, lunar habitats, and that sort of thing. I have been involved in a bunch of Mars exploration studies, asteroid exploration studies, I used to study asteroids for a living. So when they talk about sending people to asteroids, it's like, let's talk. The environment is going to be very weird on an asteroid.
Interviewer
I could probably ask you questions for days, but because you mentioned the asteroid thing, I want to, I want to dive in a little bit to space in the movies and I'm curious.
Stan Love
Oh Lord.
Interviewer
Okay, curious what your thoughts are on Armageddon? Like what was. When that came out, were you horrified? Were you like, oh, this is fun?
Stan Love
No, no, no. I expect ignorance to be on display. One of my favorites was Independence Day. The first technical error occurred in the first frame of that film.
Interviewer
Film, okay, what was that?
Stan Love
They show one of the, one of the Apollo lunar plaques on the moon and the giant alien spacecraft is flying by and the vibrations from the spacecraft are shaking the dirt around that. Yeah. No, even if your starship vibrates, which it shouldn't, that's wasted energy. There's no way to transmit that vibration through the vacuum of space to the surface of the moon when your ship is going by. So. So, Armageddon. I watched it with my wife when the brave crew is landing on the asteroid and all this weird blue, green, vaporous stuff coming off of the asteroid and my wife leans over and says, what's that stuff? And I said, art, because there's nothing like that on a real asteroid. It looks like a. It's going to look like a pile of avalanche debris. You know, stones all jumbled together, held together by its own self gravity even. Most asteroids aren't even a solid rock. They're just impact debris that's kind of barely stuck together by its own self gravity.
Interviewer
Is the premise crazy or is that far fetched of redirecting?
Stan Love
Will we split it in half and have one half go on one side of the Earth and the other half on the other? No. Will the asteroid be as big as Texas? No. There is exactly one asteroid in the solar system the size of Texas and we know exactly where it is and it's not coming here. So. No, they get almost everything wrong. I come out of space movies with a big red mark on my forehead from slapping myself. There are a couple of exceptions. Yeah, I was gonna say Martian gets a B.
Interviewer
Yes. Andy Weir is not terrible.
Emily Grace
Right.
Stan Love
The vast majority of his science is really good.
Interviewer
Did you read Hail Mary?
Stan Love
I did. It's cute. Okay, it is science based, but it's still pretty fanciful in, in my opinion.
Interviewer
Did you watch? I, I did not watch it, but ISS where like war is breaking out, got no.
Stan Love
No inclination to go there.
Interviewer
Yeah, no, it looks. It looks awful.
Stan Love
But I can tell you, though, that, you know, despite the tense political situation on Earth, we have international astronauts and cosmonauts on the space station, and they still get along like this. I figured they all wish their governments would get along better, but once you put people in space and away from the Earth, they to a large extent, represent the Earth, and a little less their own, just their own home country.
Interviewer
What is the wildest thing you've seen from space, either on Earth or anywhere?
Stan Love
Let's see. We had some interesting things to look at on my shuttle mission. One thing that really raised my eyebrows. We flew in February, so it was winter in the Northern hemisphere, and our orbit took us over Siberia during the day, several times each mission day. And over the empty steps of Siberia, there were these parallel lines that looked like the character Wolverine had taken his claws and gone across hundreds of miles of Siberia. These long, parallel, jagged lines in black against the white snowy steps. And I'm like, what on Earth is that? And it turns out during Soviet times, they were trying to farm Siberia. And one of the things that they did to try to make this happen was they planted rows of trees to make wind breaks, to slow the wind down so it wouldn't, like, blow the topsoil and the baby plants away. And so they planted these parallel rows of trees. And you can see this from space, and it's just. Just eye opening. Another interesting thing was in the middle of the Sahara Desert, there's a big area of old volcanoes called Tesi. It stands out as black rock against the tawny desert. And there's mountains there. And in the top of one mountain, there was this brilliant white spot. And I was wondering, is it high enough for snow? It turns out it's not. It's a mountain called Amicus. Probably have butchered that pronunciation, but it's an old volcanic caldera. And during the ice age, when it was wetter, it had a salt lake in the crater in the top of that mountain. And now it's just a dry salt pan. But I guess the Bedouin used to go up there to get salt. So you can see that from orbit. Those are two of the highlights that I saw on the Earth from my mission.
Interviewer
Wow, Stan, are you ever going back to spending face?
Stan Love
I don't know. I don't make that decision. I'm eligible.
Interviewer
And when are we sending our first woman to the moon?
Stan Love
We're sending our first woman around the moon next year on Artemis 2. Christina Cook is going to be on that crew then the first landing. I think we're on the schedule for 2026. But don't buy your tickets to Florida for the launch just yet.
Interviewer
And when does the crew get announced for that?
Stan Love
For Armis 3, not before Artemis 2.
Interviewer
Okay. This is very exciting, Dr. Stanlove. I don't have anything else for you. Do you have anything else you want to share about the future, the work you're doing at NASA or the ISS in general?
Stan Love
Well, the future of the work I do at NASA and the ISS in general is all totally cool. If you're interested in science and technology, come work for us at NASA. We love creative, technical people. There's a lot of folks who are kind of jaded about, about the state of Earth and everything, but we are creating an amazing future and I welcome anybody who's interested to come and help us do it.
Interviewer
Yeah. You know, and I want to ask you real quick before you go, a hard question because there are a lot of people that think, why are we spending so much money on going to the moon or going to Mars? This is very expensive.
Stan Love
Can you tell me why NASA consumes one half of 1% of the federal budget? If you did away with NASA, okay, no more Mars probes, no more astronauts, no more space station, no more Jupiter probe, no more, no more beautiful pictures of Saturn, no more understanding where our solar system came from, where our universe came from. All that goes away. And you increased the budget of every other Federal Agency by one half of 1%. You would have lost our world and our future and basically gotten nothing in return term. All of that money that NASA spends, it spends on the ground, vast majority in the United States itself, supporting jobs and communities all over the country. We get amazing new technology, we get inspiration for kids to get interested in science and technology. And the, you know, the, the future belongs to the countries that embrace science and technology. That has been true for hundreds of years and it will only be true in the future. And if there is nothing interesting to make kids excited about science and technology, they won't be. And you know, we'll be farming and the Chinese will be on Mars. So I. That's not a future I want.
Interviewer
Well, Dr. Stanlow, it was so nice to meet you.
Stan Love
Okay. Likewise.
Emily Grace
Off the Radar is a production of the National Weather Desk. Make sure you're following the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen to podcast. New episodes publish every Tuesday morning. If you like today's show, please share it with a friend and make sure you check out some of our past episodes. We have plenty of them that are all about space. Thank you to Dr. Stan Love and the team at NASA for joining me today and providing the sound at the beginning of the episode. Also, thanks to my associate producer, Brian Petrus for his help on this episode. For the National Weather desk on meteorology, psychologist Emily Gracie. Make it a great day.
Podcast Summary: Off the Radar – "The Final Frontier: The Lifecycle of the International Space Station"
Podcast Information:
In this engaging episode of Off the Radar, host Emily Gracey welcomes NASA astronaut Stan Love to delve deep into the lifecycle of the International Space Station (ISS). The conversation traverses Stan's personal journey to becoming an astronaut, the monumental achievements of the ISS, the challenges leading to its eventual deorbiting, and NASA's ambitious future endeavors, including the Artemis program. The episode offers a blend of technical insights, personal anecdotes, and forward-looking perspectives, making it both informative and captivating for listeners interested in space exploration.
Stan Love shares his early inspirations and the path that led him to NASA:
Stan provides a comprehensive overview of the ISS's origin:
Stan also touches upon the complexities of international collaboration, emphasizing seamless communication and problem-solving among different countries' control centers. “Each country has a control center for their parts of the space station... we solve problems together and we generally make it work.” (07:56)
Stan describes the multifaceted life aboard the ISS:
Notable Quote:
“Any time an astronaut has a spare moment, they're looking out the windows and at the Earth. The Earth is speaking as an astronomer. The Earth is the most interesting thing in space.” — Stan Love (13:36)
Stan discusses why the ISS is approaching the end of its operational life:
Explaining the deorbiting process, Stan elaborates:
“We want to put them in the South Pacific Ocean where nobody lives... It's the safest place on Earth to bring the space station down.” — Stan Love (26:38)
He also likens the ISS's deorbiting to a meteor entering the atmosphere, ensuring most components burn up upon re-entry, thereby mitigating environmental impacts.
Looking forward, Stan outlines NASA's next steps post-ISS:
Notable Quote:
“The future belongs to the countries that embrace science and technology... we are creating an amazing future and I welcome anybody who's interested to come and help us do it.” — Stan Love (41:13)
Stan offers his candid opinions on how space is portrayed in movies:
He humorously reflects on misconceptions, such as unrealistic asteroid behavior and physics inaccuracies, emphasizing the importance of science accuracy in media.
Stan recounts remarkable sights from his time aboard the ISS:
Stan Love underscores the enduring legacy of the ISS and the promising future of human space exploration. He passionately advocates for continued investment in NASA, highlighting the scientific, technological, and inspirational benefits that extend beyond space missions to everyday life on Earth.
Final Notable Quote:
“The space station is always getting bent and flexed... eventually it is going to be too expensive to maintain for what we get out of it.” — Stan Love (25:02)
Emily Grace wraps up the episode by encouraging listeners to engage with NASA's ongoing projects and to support scientific endeavors that pave the way for humanity's future in space.
Key Takeaways:
Notable Quotes with Timestamps:
For more insightful discussions on space, climate, and science, subscribe to Off the Radar on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.