← Offline with Jon Favreau
Offline with Jon Favreau
The Book Mark Zuckerberg Doesn’t Want You to Read
01:03:51
Meta has called an emergency arbitration hearing over a tell-all memoir by Facebook's former Director of Global Public Policy. The author, Sarah Wynn Williams, has had to cancel all her book promotion…including coming on Offline this week. Jon and Max protest Sarah’s gag order by delving into her book, Careless People, and platforming her allegations of sexual harassment, the company’s role in Myanmar's genocide, and its supplicant relationship with the Chinese Communist Party. Then, the guys discuss whether humans have passed peak brain power, and why Sam Seder’s appearance in a Jubilee video has everything Gavin Newsom’s podcast is missing.
Loading summary
Transcript296 lines
- [00:00]
Jon Favreau
Offline is brought to you by Green Chef. Green Chef is the number one meal kit for clean eating. Delivering pre portioned and prepped quality whole foods with limited processed ingredients. Green Chef sends organic fresh produce, responsibly sourced proteins and Chef designed recipes in every box for satisfying, nourishing and convenient meals that make it easy to stick to a clean eating routine. This year, ditch the fads and create healthier eating habits that last with real clean foods. Green Chef makes it easy with recipes curated for a variety of lifestyles and dietary needs. With pre made sauces and pre portioned ingredients, there's less prep and less mess and more time to savor delicious restaurant quality meals. Stay on track even on your busiest days. With salads ready in five minutes or less, ready to blend smoothies and grab and go protein packed breakfasts. Green Chef can even help you keep feeling energized and curb cravings with a specially curated hydration bundle. So I've been trying this Green Chef and Mediterranean shrimp bowls. You get some jasmine rice, broccoli, feta, olives, 25 minutes to prepare. I'm not like I don't do a lot of cooking but you try Green Chef. It's really easy. Ingredients are all fresh. It tastes delicious. So it's really great. Thrive all year with clean easy meals from Green chef. Go to greenchef.com offlinefree and use code offlinefree to get started with free salads for two months plus 50% off your first box. That's greenchef.com/ free code offline free green chef the number one meal kit for eating well. A 14 year old girl deleting a selfie and then getting the beauty ad.
- [01:32]
Max Fisher
I know is just so or the weight loss ad.
- [01:34]
Jon Favreau
Right? It's just like knowing that that is when you're deleting a selfie. You're saying I didn't look good in this probably or there's a good chance of that. It's fucking gross.
- [01:43]
Max Fisher
When you're going to your $20 million vacation house in St. Barts that you know was built partly off of exploiting 14 year old girls, feeling bad and delivering them a weight loss ad and thinking this is good and in fact I want to my way to do a cover up to keep getting that money. H how do you do that? How do you go to that house?
- [02:04]
Jon Favreau
You're just really excited about free speech. I'm Jon Favreau.
- [02:14]
Max Fisher
I'm Max Fisher.
- [02:15]
Jon Favreau
Max, are you ready to land on the meta do not hire list? You weren't Looking for a job there, were you?
- [02:23]
Max Fisher
I don't if I was. I think this is going to be the week that that finally, once and.
- [02:27]
Jon Favreau
For all press that off the bucket list. We originally had a special episode planned for you all today. Sarah Wynn Williams, the former director of Global public policy at Facebook, who recently published an explosive tell all memoir about her experience at the company with the great title Careless People. Great title, was scheduled to sit down with Max and I to talk about the many serious allegations in her book as well as the official whistleblower complaint she filed with the sec. But late last week, Meta called an emergency arbitration hearing arguing that by writing and promoting this book, Sarah had violated a non disparagement clause in her severance agreement. Meta claims that they emailed her about the arbitration hearing, but she didn't show up and the arbiter ruled in Meta's favor and prohibited Williams from further publishing, distributing or promoting Careless People. So our interview with Sarah was canceled.
- [03:20]
Max Fisher
Wild.
- [03:21]
Jon Favreau
Her publisher, Flatiron Books, has no intention of halting the sale of the book.
- [03:25]
Max Fisher
Good for them.
- [03:26]
Jon Favreau
And while we don't exactly know what's next for Sarah, I imagine she'll challenge the this ruling in court, which she can do and hopefully she can get to resume promoting the book, in which case we will have her on. But in the meantime, we figured we'd do what Sarah can't do currently and talk about the experiences and allegations she wrote about. But before we get to all that, we just gotta let's start talking about Meta's attempts to silence Sarah, which are. Wild can you recall another attempt by a tech company or any company to silence an employee as blatantly and publicly as this one?
- [04:04]
Max Fisher
I this feels totally unprecedented to me because it's not just silencing her, they are trying to suppress this book. I mean part of the arbitration ruling says that she has to, with all means within her power, stop distribution of the book, which is not within her power. So it effectively like has not pulled it off the shelves. But they are really going all out in a way that I have never seen before. And companies don't usually do this kind of thing even if they're really, really mad about a book because it looks terrible, it looks really bad. And it really tells you something that they are willing to to say we are going to take the incredible PR hit and the major PR risk to try to suppress an entire book because they're either there's like some level of vindictiveness from the executives who are implicated very, very heavily in this book, or they're just absolutely terrified by the allegations in it. But whatever, whatever the motivation, it's not working.
- [04:58]
Jon Favreau
It is absolutely hilarious that this all comes just a few weeks after Mark Zuckerberg announced that they're going back to their free speech.
- [05:06]
Max Fisher
I know, I know. It's like we all knew it was bullshit, but it's. Oh, yeah, Mark Zuckerberg just believes in free speech. He's just a chill guy who wants to go by Rogan and hang out and suppress the publication of books that he doesn't like. And it's. They don't even their. Their legal strategy. I think this is important for people to know publicly in their PR statements, they're saying, oh, the book is all false or it's already known, which are two contradictory claims, by the way. But legally, if you actually read the arbitration, they just claim that she is not allowed to disparage them because of her non disparagement agreement when she left the company. Which. And they are also being very transparent about this. They're saying, yeah, that's right, we fired her because she complained about Joel Kaplan allegedly sexually assaulting her.
- [05:46]
Jon Favreau
Yeah. And they may. And they say in the ruling too, that we make no judgment about the content of the book. Yep, in the ruling.
- [05:52]
Max Fisher
That's right. Right. Even as they come out and say, and. And it's like it's not just her. There are all of these stories that you're hearing now of book reviewers being like, Meta was hounding us. Like the Washington Post book reviewer described the Metacoms people hounding him for days in a preemptive quote, counter assault before the book even came out, like, peppering him with questions, are you going to review it? What are you going to say about it? He wrote, in my 27 years of reviewing and editing newspaper book sections, no company has ever done this with me. When one of the world's most powerful media companies tries to snuff out a. It's time to pull out all the stops. So the book reviewers are panicking about Meta, which is concerning.
- [06:31]
Jon Favreau
Well, as you. As you said, it's not working. Careless people rocketed to the top of the Amazon bestseller list after Meta pulled this. It seems like they might have really fucked themselves with this stuff.
- [06:44]
Max Fisher
This might honestly be the biggest Streisand effect of all time. Like, I wish to God that Meta had tried to suppress my book. Like, you can get these kind of sales. So there's a, There's a little independent bookstore, like right by my house, and I happened to walk by there the day the book came out, or maybe it was the day after, but it was before the injunction of the arbitration happened. And they had, like, a big stack and like, nobody was really looking at him. And it was like, well, maybe it's not really selling that well. And I was like, okay, but I'm glad that she got it out there and it's in the public record. And then this arbitration ruling hit. And I went by the bookstore the next day because I was like, I should get a physical copy. And they were like, not only are we sold out, cause I couldn't find it. I was like, oh, they put it in the back because nobody was buying it. They were like, we're sold out and we're on deep backorder. It'll be weeks before we can get enough copies. They were like, the demand has been crazy.
- [07:31]
Jon Favreau
That's awesome.
- [07:32]
Max Fisher
Yeah. It has not worked for it. Which tells you something about the company and about the recklessness that they engage in, which people who have been, like, reporting on the company have been trying to warn us about for years. Sarah Williams is trying to warn us about in this book. And it is wild to see that. Just they, like, they come out swinging and they're not really thinking about the consequences apparent.
- [07:54]
Jon Favreau
And I'm wondering about the freakout. And I mean, it is bad timing for them because they have some court cases.
- [08:01]
Max Fisher
They have a big FTC case that's Mark Zuckerberg is getting interviewed for seven or deposed for seven hours this week over this FTC case to maybe break up Meta.
- [08:11]
Jon Favreau
You think they'll have some questions from the book?
- [08:15]
Max Fisher
I don't. They have to get a copy first.
- [08:17]
Jon Favreau
Well, let's get to the allegations that Mark Zuckerberg doesn't want you to hear. We've both read the book now, and in addition to a thousand little stories about the selfishness and carelessness wild of Mark and Sheryl Sandberg and Joel Kaplan, there are a handful of major allegations in the book about sexual harassment, enabling genocide, Myanmar, and offering the Chinese Communist Party tailored surveillance tools to spy and crack down on dissidents that we should share. We talked a little bit about China last week after the Washington Post reported on a complaint Sarah filed with the sec. That said, we want to read you all an excerpt from the book where Sarah begins to understand the extent that Facebook was willing to appease the Chinese Communist Party.
- [09:02]
Max Fisher
Yes, Let me pull that up. So we are, as you said, because she cannot be here, but we have, you know, 300 pages of Sarah Wynne Williams we're just going to read the book directly. And I also. This is kind of a dream for me. Reading out loud on a microphone is like, that's. That just is so fun to me. Okay. Facebook would build facial recognition, photo targeting and other moderation tools to facilitate Chinese censorship. This is Sarawin Williams discovering documents about Facebook's big plan to get into China. Under direction from Mark, Facebook assembled a large team, including some of its most senior and respected engineers, to work up what the Chinese Communist Party wanted. Always a great sign. They start building new censorship tools for Honi, who's a private equity company, to use to scour through people's messages and posts, converting everything to simplified Chinese. I find detailed content, moderation and censorship tools. There would be an emergency switch to block any specific region in China, like Xinjiang, where the Uyghurs are from interacting with Chinese and non Chinese users. Also an emergency, extreme emergency content switch to remove viral content originating inside or outside China. Quote, during times of potential unrest, including significant anniversaries like the June 4 anniversary of Tiananmen Square, their citizenship tools would automatically examine any content with more than 10,000 views by Chinese users. Once this fidelity counter got built, the documents say that Facebook deployed it in Hong Kong and Taiwan, where it's been running on every post. And then there's.
- [10:31]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, the key phrase there is inside and inside or outside, not even.
- [10:38]
Max Fisher
They're just deploying it outside China. Just as a little gimme. Just as a little. Here you go, Xi Jinping. Here's a little taste. Why don't you deploy Chinese censorship outside of China's borders?
- [10:45]
Jon Favreau
So, like, if there are Chinese dissidents.
- [10:47]
Max Fisher
In the United States, It's a great question. I mean, as we discussed last week, they deleted the Facebook page of a Chinese citizen in the United States on behalf of Beijing. As I read through page after page, I see the sort of briefings that would warm the hearts of every government I work with. We never share this type of information, and believe me, they've asked. But here are detailed explanations of precisely how the technology functions. Algorithms and photo tag and facial recognition. All the secrets of the trade that I thought would never be revealed to anyone outside of Facebook. Facebook is providing engineers to demonstrate, offering ideas on how to adapt the settings to meet the Chinese government's needs. It's white glove service for the ccp. The ugly fact is that these are many of the things Facebook has said are simply impossible. When Congress and its own government has asked on content, data sharing, privacy, censorship, and encryption. And yet its leadership are handing them all to China on a silver platter. So things that they told the US government are physically impossible for us to do, they are proactively doing for the.
- [11:47]
Jon Favreau
Chinese government, white glove service for the ccp. It's a good line, a great line.
- [11:52]
Max Fisher
Good line.
- [11:52]
Jon Favreau
And really sort of captures what this was. Because, you know, you're reading in Sarah's voice there, she. Her job was to work with governments all over the world.
- [12:00]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [12:01]
Jon Favreau
And governments all over the world probably wanted some of this. Some of them, yeah.
- [12:05]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [12:05]
Jon Favreau
And it was always a no. But Mark wanted to get into China so badly.
- [12:09]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [12:09]
Jon Favreau
That maybe one of the most repressive governments was willing to give.
- [12:14]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [12:14]
Jon Favreau
All these surveillance tools to.
- [12:15]
Max Fisher
Right. Proactively to volunteer it. Yes. And I think that, I think this is one of those things where it's not just the crime, it's the COVID up. Like you expect Meta to sell out its users. We kind of know that that was always built into the platform. But they are selling out the US government, which regulates them, ostensibly in theory, by telling them we can't do these things that you're asking us to do, these ways that our platform is destabilizing the US but then actually it turn out that they can't. Turns out they've been lying to the US government and regulators.
- [12:44]
Jon Favreau
According to the book question for you that I never really figured out, why didn't they ultimately not end up in China? Facebook.
- [12:53]
Max Fisher
I mean, I think we have to read between the lines a little bit, but the implication that I got is that just China never wanted a major American owned social media platform in their country. They wanted a Chinese based company. I mean, this was always their thing, even when they did work with American Internet companies, is you have to have a headquarters here and you have to work with Chinese companies. And like if they could just have a Chinese company that was based entirely in China and that they had all of their usual tools of leverage and control over, why wouldn't they prefer that? And also why wouldn't they prefer to have that homegrown for economic reasons too?
- [13:28]
Jon Favreau
So as, as horny as Mark was for the ccp, they ultimately it was not. It was unrequited.
- [13:36]
Max Fisher
I think, I honestly think that they were playing him from the beginning.
- [13:40]
Jon Favreau
Interesting.
- [13:41]
Max Fisher
And it's like they talk about how Instagram was in China early on, like over a while ago, like a very stripped down version of Instagram. And I think this was always just a, like Xi Jinping showing a little ankle so that Mark Zuckerberg would hand over the crown jewels. This metaphor is really getting away from me. But then planning, like, always planning to kick them out. And you see Sarawin Williams and other people at Facebook, according to her accounts, like, trying to tell the executives that and trying to say, like, this is never gonna happen and we're creating all of this risk for ourselves for nothing. But it's just, it's. It's his white whale.
- [14:14]
Jon Favreau
Let's talk about the allegations concerning Myanmar. So we all know that Facebook was accused by the UN of abetting a genocide in Myanmar. We've talked about it a few times on this show. Yep. But now, thanks to Sarah, we know what was happening inside Facebook as this violence unfolded. Max, you highlighted an example that shows just how indifferent Facebook's leadership was to what was happening in Myanmar. Can you read that one?
- [14:39]
Max Fisher
Yeah. So this is just. We won't get into the whole everything that happens, just kind of a revealing moment. This is an anecdote that is about Facebook systems actively promoting false claims that have led to race baiting and led to a bunch of riots and violence in Myanmar. I get an email telling me the HUNA wants us to remove these posts because they're causing real world violence. Riots. Riots are ongoing. Buddhist mobs are attacking Muslim shops. People are dying. The posts seem like a clear violation of our standards, but the Content Operations team, which is based in Dublin, doesn't want to take the post down. The case officer tells me she doesn't think they violate our rules, but she can't find anyone who speaks Burmese and Google Translate doesn't do Burmese, so she can't say for sure. I pull in someone more senior and he reaches out to that same contractor they'd hired a few months before, a Burmese guy based in Dublin, Their one moderator for Burmese content to review the material. Five hours passed. How long do you think this will take? I ask. There are riots in the streets over this. I really need these posts to come down. Unfortunately, no idea, the senior guy responds. He's offline. I have pinged him on FB and hope he sees it when he gets back to me. This is again, people are dying as this is happening. Do you have a contact phone number for him? I write, this is an emergency. The senior guy calls him. The Burmese contractor is at a restaurant and I'm told he'll go home and should have access to a PC in 15 minutes. He'll comb through the post and try to see what is being said and if we want an action on it or not. Nearly two hours pass and the senior guy confesses. Contractor does not have his work laptop and he himself is on the road, but he'll get to it when he gets home later. I feel both responsible and completely impotent. When will be you be in a position to do this? We really need to move quickly. And then of course, nothing happens for many hours until the government finally just blocks Facebook. This cannot be the system Facebook relies on when people are dying. If posts are causing riots in the streets, we can't be depending on some random contractor in Ireland who's out to dinner and can't find his laptop. But they did. And they continued to because they didn't care.
- [16:35]
Jon Favreau
Well, I was going to say it's. I'm glad we read that one after the China passage because the contrast with like, they were willing to hand over all of their trade secrets and build new surveillance tools. There's no principle the Chinese Communist Party could take down a post at a moment's notice anywhere in the world that was critical of them. But there's a genocide unfolding in Myanmar and they've just got one guy in Dublin who's a contractor who speaks Burmese who was like out to dinner and didn't bring his laptop.
- [17:03]
Max Fisher
And multiple executives at the company are like, hey, we're causing multiple deaths of people in Myanmar and just nobody can be fucking fussed to do anything about it. And she talks about this was an incident in 2014. She talks about this continuing and being the status quo for years. And I appreciated knowing, even though it was not like super surprising, but knowing just that everybody in the company was completely aware of this and as you say, it wasn't a priority. They didn't care, so they chose not to act. And the only reason was that it would have taken up a little bit of their time. And they just. Why do they care? Just people in Myanmar.
- [17:41]
Jon Favreau
Offline is brought to you by three day Blinds. Talk about how Lovett came up with the idea to have three day blinds installed in your office. That's not what happened. That's not how it went. Lovett might have been the one that fact check false. That demanded there were three day blinds in our office. But I know one has been blinded by the sunlight in our office. That's right. It's a. It's more of a Tommy thing. And you know what? Help me. We're pretty excited. Very excited. We are very excited for the. We already have three day blinds in other parts of the office. Some reason in our office we didn't have any. Yeah. But where we do have them in the office they look fantastic, work great, and they work really great. There's a better way to buy blinds, shades, shutters and drapery and it's called three day Blinds. They are the leading manufacturer of high quality custom window treatments in the U.S. and right now, if you use our URL3dayblinds.com offline, they're running a buy one, get one 50% off deal. We can shop for almost anything at home. Why not shop for blinds at home too? Three Day Blinds has local, professionally trained design consultants who have an average of 10 plus years of experience that provide expert guidance on the right blinds for you in the comfort of your home. Just set up an appointment and you'll get a free no obligation quote the same day. Not very handy. Like me, DIY projects can be fun, but measuring and installing blinds can be a big challenge. No way. No chance I could install blinds. Could you imagine? No, you messed that up. No, I need a professional. I need someone from three day Blinds to do this. There is zero, zero chance I'm sitting, I'm installing blinds. The Expert team at 3 Day Blinds handles all the heavy lifting. They design, measure and install so you can sit back, relax and leave it to the pros. In addition to having three day blinds at the office, I've had them installed in my home before and they do a great job. The design consultant comes out, they're great, they tell you what you need, they install them, you don't have to worry about it right now. Get quality window treatments that fit your budget with three day blinds. Head to three day blinds.com offline for their buy one, get one 50% off deal on custom blinds, shades, shutters and drapery for a free, no charge, no obligation consultation. Just head to threeday blinds.com offline one last time. That's buy one get one 50% off when you head to the number 3D a Y blinds.com offline.
- [19:40]
C
This podcast is supported by Comedy Central's Emmy Award winning series, the Daily Show. Jon Stewart and the Daily show news team are covering every minute of every hour of President Trump's second first 100 days in office with brand new episodes every weeknight. From the lowest lows to the highest lows and everything in between, they'll be there to break it all down. Comedy Central's the Daily show, new tonight at 11 on Comedy Central and streaming next day on Paramount. Plus.
- [20:09]
Jon Favreau
Another allegation we should talk about is Facebook targeting and manipulating the emotions of teenage girls. So In April of 2017, a confidential document from Facebook leaked to The Australian press that claimed the company was offering advertisers the opportunity to target 13 to 17 year olds during moments of psychological vulnerability when they feel, quote, worthless, insecure, stressed, defeated, anxious, stupid, useless or like a failure. End quote. Offering advertisers to target these young girls with weight loss or beauty ads during their most vulnerable moments. Wild. Again, I know there is a whole presentation that leaks that you can so this is not just like 13 to.
- [20:56]
Max Fisher
17 year old girls targeting at moments of insecurity to sell them stuff.
- [21:00]
Jon Favreau
At the time, Facebook claimed that they did not actually offer these tools and that this deck was intended to, quote, help marketers understand how people express themselves on Facebook. We now know from Sarawin Williams that that wasn't exactly the truth. Max, can you read the section you highlighted?
- [21:16]
Max Fisher
Yes. So cut to at a big emergency meeting with a bunch of executives where they're talking about what to do about this. The privacy staffer explains that teams do this type of customized work targeting insecurities for other advertisers and there are presentations for other clients specifically targeting teens. We discussed the possibility that this news might lead to investigations by state attorney generals or the Federal Trade Commission because it might become public that Facebook commercializes and exploits Facebook youngest users. To me this type of surveillance and monetization of young teens sense of wiltlessness feels like a concrete step toward the dystopian future Facebook's critics had long warmed of. A statement is quickly drafted and the response team debates whether Facebook can include the line quote we take this very seriously and are taking every effort to remedy this situation, end quote. Since in fact this is apparently just normal business practice. A comm staffer points out what should be obvious that we can't say we're taking efforts to remedy it if we're not. This prompts other team members to confirm his take, revealing other examples they know of. Facebook targets young mothers based on their emotional states, targets racial and ethnic groups. Facebook does work for a beauty product company tracking when 13 to 17 year old girls delete selfies so it could serve a beauty add to them in that moment. And then she talks about how people in the meeting are horrified. The weird thing is that the rest of our Facebook coworkers seem unbothered by this. I'm still struggling to get a better picture of what we're dealing with here. So I ask for an independent audit by a third party to understand everything that Facebook has done like this around the world targeting vulnerable people so I can try to stop it. Who is this information? How Many advertisers, has it been shared with the team is not enthusiastic. And then she talks about other executives. Nixit, they say, no paper trail, no investigation. Then she talks about somebody actually dies maybe as a result of this or it's revealed from a lawsuit. The initial statement Facebook gives the Australian journalists who discovered the targeting surveillance back in 2017 does not acknowledge that this sort of ad targeting is commonplace at Facebook. In fact, it pretends the opposite. And she goes on, despite this, Elliot, Elliot Traj, Joel Kaplan and many of Facebook's most senior executives devise a cover up. Facebook issues a second statement that is a flat out lie. Quote, Facebook does not offer tools to target people based on their emotional state. The new statement is circulated to a large group of senior management who know it's a lie and approve it anyway.
- [23:38]
Jon Favreau
Fucking wild, man.
- [23:40]
Max Fisher
I know they were really. They're selling out kids. They're selling out kids like.
- [23:44]
Jon Favreau
So I know some of this has been reported. Some of this came out with the Francis Haugen whistleblower.
- [23:50]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [23:51]
Jon Favreau
Situation. So it's not a completely new revelation. But some of this is also new, right?
- [23:56]
Max Fisher
Absolutely, yeah. I mean I think the, the fact that there was a concerted cover up, the fact that this wasn't just a like rogue salesperson who went off and did this, that this was deliberate strategy from the top. And I think that what's revealing, in.
- [24:10]
Jon Favreau
Fact at one point, I think someone from the Australia team, after they put out the same.
- [24:14]
Max Fisher
Oh yeah, they fired.
- [24:15]
Jon Favreau
Yep, they will. That Australia team called Sarah and was like, why are you putting out that statement? Of course we actually, we brag about these tools to advertisers.
- [24:25]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [24:25]
Jon Favreau
So it's like this is part of our business that we go around selling. And so that person was mad from another perspective, which is like you put out that statement, it's going to hurt our efforts with advertisers to sell more.
- [24:35]
Max Fisher
The thing that comes through here is that they do the COVID up not to. Not for PR reasons, not because they want to hide the fact that they have been doing this in the past. They do the COVID up because they like it. They think this is good, it's deliberate strategy, it makes them a lot of money and they want to continue doing it. And we have every reason to believe that they have. The thing that really gets me is saying they don't even want to do an internal audit among themselves to find out how commonplace it is because they don't want a paper trail. Even fucking. The CIA torture program had a paper trail that's nuts.
- [25:08]
Jon Favreau
It's really the idea that what else.
- [25:10]
Max Fisher
Are they doing they don't want a paper trail of.
- [25:12]
Jon Favreau
And I know there's been so many examples of this, but like if a 14 year old girl deleting a selfie and then getting the beauty ad I know is just so.
- [25:22]
Max Fisher
Or the weight loss ad.
- [25:23]
Jon Favreau
Right. It's just like knowing that that is when you're deleting a selfie. You're saying I didn't look good in this probably, or there's a good chance of that. It's fucking gross.
- [25:32]
Max Fisher
When you're going to your $20 million vacation house in St. Barts that you know was built partly off of exploiting 14 year old girls, feeling bad and delivering them a we ad and thinking this is good. And in fact I want to go out of my way to do a cover up to keep getting that money. How do you do that? How do you go to that house?
- [25:53]
Jon Favreau
You're just really excited about free speech, getting back to your roots an mma, you know, just gonna, you're getting here into some fighting and you're.
- [26:04]
Max Fisher
I am so glad that he's feeling in touch with his masculinity. That's.
- [26:08]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, maybe he would, maybe he would serve some ads. Maybe that's, maybe he's a victim of his own. That's why he looks like this.
- [26:14]
Max Fisher
Do you. What do you think his screen numbers are?
- [26:16]
Jon Favreau
I don't know.
- [26:17]
Max Fisher
I bet it's, I bet it's really low.
- [26:18]
Jon Favreau
That's another thing that she says in the book is that none of the executives or very few of the executives at Facebook let their own kids, of.
- [26:27]
Max Fisher
Course not use the app there. Who knows better how dangerous it is?
- [26:31]
Jon Favreau
Right. And it was just a very. And we've heard this at other companies and from other people too, but with Twitter. Anything else.
- [26:37]
Max Fisher
But it really tells you it is.
- [26:38]
Jon Favreau
So telling about what social media does to kids. That the people who work in social media don't let their kids on social media.
- [26:45]
Max Fisher
Yes. I don't. When they are speaking publicly, they're the liberation company, they're the free speech company. They're lifting all of us up. And when it's behind closed doors and among themselves, they know that they're the cigarette company. They know it.
- [26:57]
Jon Favreau
So we should also finally talk about the sort of the, the mistreatment that Sarah experiment experiences at Facebook. We talked, I think we talked last week about the weird Cheryl stuff.
- [27:07]
Max Fisher
We did, we did. And I, I finally read it and boy, it is so much weirder than you think. It is from the media write ups.
- [27:14]
Jon Favreau
Oh, yeah, yeah, just read the whole thing. Thing. She also details sexual harassment and mistreatment by her superior, Joel Kaplan, former Bush administration official who now serves as President of Global affairs at Meta. There are genuinely too many examples of this to talk about all of them right now. But we want to zero in on one specific incident. The performance review that Joel forces Sarah to take after she was on maternity leave, which she spent most of hospitalized. This was, I know, galling.
- [27:42]
Max Fisher
It's really galling. I returned to work in August 2016. My first day back. Joel Kaplan decided to do a performance review. As he says, it's performance review season. A quick Google search confirms my suspicion that you were not supposed to be given a performance review of your maternity leave. In fact, I understand that pushing someone to work during their maternity leave is against the law. Nevertheless, quote, you weren't responsive enough. He says, in my defense, I was in a coma for some of it. It's not just me, Sarah. Some of your other colleagues found it challenging to engage with you. And then she says, I mean, you know, I was in a hospital in a coma and near death. But I accept that this did make it hard to engage with me at times, end quote. Irrespective. This leads him to conclude that there were, quote, issues limiting my effectiveness. And both he and my peers say I was, quote, difficult to work with during this period. Sadly, he notes that he is unable to put a formal performance review in the system to accompany this feedback because I was out of the system for most of the performance cycle, again, because she was in a coma. But he wants to know that if he could, it would. But he wants me to know that if he could, it would be bad.
- [28:43]
Jon Favreau
I mean, and like, it's a horrifying story.
- [28:47]
Max Fisher
She almost died.
- [28:47]
Jon Favreau
She almost dies, like, right during. And then after childbirth. And then there's a lot of complications. She's in a coma.
- [28:54]
Max Fisher
She's working for most of it.
- [28:55]
Jon Favreau
Working. Yeah. And then she. When she wakes up from the coma, she's still in the hospital. She's out for a long time and then comes in and gets this review. But I'm glad we chose this one too, because there's. There's some sexual harassment allegations as well. And we talked about the Cheryl thing. But it's. I. I think it's important to realize the. The portrait she paints of Facebook leadership. And this is true of Mark, of Joel, of Sarah, of a lot of them is just like, they are so relentless about work.
- [29:24]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [29:24]
Jon Favreau
And the idea of like the work life balance is just. It's completely out the window. They are just ruthless.
- [29:32]
Max Fisher
Yeah. I think it's the, it's the meanness and the callousness and the cruelty that gets me. Not just because, hey, it seems like the C suite of Facebook is a tough place to work and I wouldn't want to work there. So as you say, you know, it's a tough day for my job prospects there. But if they are willing to treat the people who they see every day and who they go on trips with and who they play Settlers of Catan with at weird work trips to Jakarta, like, if they're willing to treat these people that cruelly and heartlessly, how are they going to treat the rest of us? Not well.
- [30:02]
Jon Favreau
It is the. It is the, you know, move fast, break things.
- [30:06]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [30:06]
Jon Favreau
Hardcore. Right, Right. This is Elon in Twitter. This is Uber. This is.
- [30:11]
Max Fisher
It's all part of the greater good. If we're making more money, we're producing more good in the world. So actually you're the bad person for almost dying on maternity leave.
- [30:17]
Jon Favreau
Well, and it's also like we're changing the world here, you know, and we're building these things that are going to change humanity and stuff like that. And so, yeah, I'm gonna. Gonna break a few eggs. Right. That's the, that's sort of the right.
- [30:30]
Max Fisher
You have to be willing. And maybe, maybe one of the eggs is your life.
- [30:33]
Jon Favreau
But I will say that the. In all the pushback. Right. So there's all these former Facebook employees who've now put out statements that all sound like they're the same statement.
- [30:43]
Max Fisher
Yes. Right. It's very conspicuous.
- [30:45]
Jon Favreau
But it's like, you know, I know some of these people too, that have put out statements, and I'm just. It's very like. Like the jo. It's focused on Joel mostly. And I don't know if that's interesting. Cheryl's gone, Mark's Mark, and Joel is now the sort of the time. But it's. It's a lot of. That's not the Joel I know. Joel's been a mentor to me. And it's like, that doesn't have to be Right. Those don't have to be lies either.
- [31:07]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [31:08]
Jon Favreau
Like, people are different and some people could have great experiences with Joel Kaplan.
- [31:12]
Max Fisher
Sure. Yeah.
- [31:13]
Jon Favreau
It doesn't mean that this is not true and that he can't be an absolute to a lot of other people, especially people who challenge him, like Sarah clearly did.
- [31:22]
Max Fisher
Well, I mean, they, again, meta's own comms. Around this have explicitly said that they fired her in part for bringing these allegations against him. Now, the way that they have couched it is they said that she. It was toxic behavior and unfounded allegations. And we did an investigation and we decided that he was innocent. But okay, he. That's great. That's great that you decided that he was innocent of sexual harassment. Why is that a reason to fire her? And I think that this all speaks to an extreme protectiveness around him, which I think is partly because he is their lifeline to the Trump administration.
- [31:57]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, that's true.
- [31:57]
Max Fisher
I mean, he is the Republican Trump operative within meta. That's part of their deal, is that he gets free reign over policy and that Trump leaves them alone or maybe does them some favors, like at least pretending to ban TikTok. And I think that there is probably a legitimate fear within Meta that if Joel, If. If Joel Kaplan left for some reason because there was enough of a movement against him within the company, because these instances are never isolated, that that would be really, really harmful for their relationship with Trump and therefore maybe the survival of the company.
- [32:27]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, that's true. And he is a, you know, he's a Bush era Republican, but he's also, you know, in the book, she writes that he was, like, sitting behind Kavanaugh during Kavanaugh's hearings, and then, like, his wife threw a big, you know, party for Kavanaugh after he was confirmed.
- [32:42]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [32:42]
Jon Favreau
So it's a very, like, Bush era Republican who has, like, like, drifted towards maga. And it's now the MAGA connection.
- [32:48]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [32:49]
Jon Favreau
Although now, I guess Mark, you know, Mark's standing at the fucking inaugural behind Trump.
- [32:52]
Max Fisher
So can I actually give you another example of their MAGA Trump connection? So this is another. This is a quick excerpt from the book. This is right after the 2016 election. And the setup to this is that according to Sarawin Williams, a number of the company's own executives concluded that Facebook actively elected Trump in the election. Not just like a passive conduit, but like the platform and the decision they made got him into office. And there's this scene she recounts that's really stunning. On this long international flight, all the executives gathered around Zuckerberg laying out the case to him. And I won't go into, because it's like, it's quite long, but it's incredibly persuasive. But the part I want to read is Zuckerberg's response to all of this.
- [33:38]
Jon Favreau
Because at first he's like, by the way, he's like, fuck. Even internally he's like, we didn't elect Trump. These people don't know what they're talking about. This is bullshit and I don't believe it. And so he does that sort of thing, Right? Which he kind of did publicly at first.
- [33:51]
Max Fisher
That was. Yes, publicly. It was like.
- [33:53]
Jon Favreau
And then they realized that they have to lay out the truth to him. And so they do this on this flight.
- [33:58]
Max Fisher
Thank you. Yes. Mark quietly takes it all in. At first he's skeptical and pushing back, but that gradually turns into curiosity. He starts to ask questions, trying to understand the mechanics of it all. He doesn't seem upset that the platform would be used this way. Not in the slightest. If anything, there's admiration for the ingenuity. Like these tools were there all the time for anyone to use this way. How smart that they figured it out. When all this was explained to Cheryl at a later business operations meeting, once she grasped what Trump's campaign did, her immediate response was not horror, but that it was brilliant and innovative. And do you think we might have a shot at hiring Trump's Facebook guy, Brad Parscale, to come work at Facebook?
- [34:37]
Jon Favreau
That was amazing.
- [34:37]
Max Fisher
No one said anything. And after a while, awkward moment. Chase and she shifted gears. Of course that's silly. He can have his pick of jobs right now. A pause. But maybe there are others from the Trump campaign who we could bring inside Facebook.
- [34:50]
Jon Favreau
That part was fucking.
- [34:51]
Max Fisher
I know, I know. It really. And honestly, it completely tracks. It completely tracks for me that they saw that Facebook could swing elections and they thought, hey, maybe this is useful. Maybe this has some business applications for us.
- [35:05]
Jon Favreau
And there's a part later that again, you should all get the book and read it. There's part later where Mark starts flirting with the idea of maybe him running for president.
- [35:14]
Max Fisher
Yep, yep.
- [35:14]
Jon Favreau
And sets up the. When he went to Iowa and all that kind of stuff. And, and Sarah makes the point that like, he, he knows these tools work.
- [35:21]
Max Fisher
What do you think?
- [35:22]
Jon Favreau
He owns the platform. And he's like, right, wouldn't it be interesting if I could control the media and maybe elections?
- [35:30]
Max Fisher
Yes. So there's another conclusion that he seems to draw from this. I am really surprised that this has not gotten more attention. This, to me is one of the most explosive parts of the book is that Sarah Wynne Williams lays out in this series of stories that kind of recur over and over throughout the book. That's this set of anecdotes mapping out what certainly reads like a concerted years long global campaign by Meta to covertly tip the platform in favor of certain politicians, governments and leaders in exchange for favorable regulations and laws. I found this to be very scary. And this, to me was, was totally new. Just a few weeks over, he takes over his predecessor's job. Joel Kaplan starts hiring a political sales team to push politicians here and abroad into becoming advertisers. The idea is if politicians depend on Facebook to win elections, they will be less likely to do anything that will harm Facebook. If Facebook is the goose that lays the golden eggs, no one wants to kill the goose. Get them hooked on those golden eggs. And then she talks about this entire scheme that Joel Kaplan had to start, quote, unquote, packs abroad to pay politicians that are friendly to Facebook. And she has to say, that's bribery and illegal. Please don't do that. And the idea apparently never goes anywhere but tells you something about their mindset.
- [36:49]
Jon Favreau
By the way, this did not, at least for a while, did not work with Donald Trump since. Since Facebook did help him in the election. And then he wanted to put Mark Zuckerberg in jail. So that's the book. Yeah, I know it sounds like we read a lot, but you know what?
- [37:05]
Max Fisher
There's so much, so much more, so much more in there.
- [37:07]
Jon Favreau
Go, go get careless, people.
- [37:08]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [37:09]
Jon Favreau
Mark Zuckerberg doesn't want you to read it.
- [37:10]
Max Fisher
If you can find it, you should read it.
- [37:12]
Jon Favreau
Yes. Yep. And it's. And hopefully some point Sarah can come on if this gag order is lifted and, and tell us more because I imagine she has a lot, lot more that she didn't even get to put in the books.
- [37:23]
Max Fisher
Or you know what, maybe I'll travel to a country without an extradition treaty. And interviewer there.
- [37:28]
Jon Favreau
Perfect.
- [37:29]
Max Fisher
Interviewer in Venezuela.
- [37:30]
Jon Favreau
Perfect. Oh, man. All right, we're going to move on, but before we jump to break some quick housekeeping, you can now listen to the first two episodes of Shadow Kingdom, God's Banker, Wherever you get your podcast, this is our brand new show about how the Vatican's top money man who was found dead in 1982, was entangled in a vast money laundering operation that put him in the crosshairs of the Sicilian Mafia, a secretive far right Masonic lodge, and the Catholic Church itself. Forty years later, journalist Nicolo Minoni gets a tip about the death that changes everything. Follow him as he unravels a web of power, crime and conspiracy. To answer the question, who really killed God's Banker? Also check out the latest inside 2025, where Dan and Alyssa Master Monaco break down what a government shutdown actually is, who's affected the political fallout and what really went down behind the scenes. Get access to this exclusive series and more by heading to crooked.com friends to subscribe. When we come back, Max and I will talk about the all the non Facebook news we've been watching. Today's episode is sponsored by Acorns. They say money can't buy you happiness. That might be true, but money sure can make you feel a lot of other things. Like stressed, guilty, overwhelmed. That's because when you're not in control of your money, your money can control you. Tommy. If you get too much money, you have a mental breakdown in front of the entire country in the Oval Office. Take too much, allegedly of a certain banned substance and then start slashing government agencies. Suddenly you're selling cars in the driveway. Acorns is a financial wellness app that helps you take control of your money with simple tools that make it easy to start saving and investing for your future. You don't need to be an expert. Acorns will recommend a diversified portfolio that matches you and your money goals. You don't need to be rich. Acorns let you get started with the spare money you've got right now. Even if all you've got is spare change, you can create your Acorns account and start investing in just five minutes. Financial wellness doesn't have to feel impossible. Acorns gives you small, simple steps to get you and your money on track. Basically, Acorns does the hard part so you can give your money a chance to grow. Ready to take control of your money? Sign up now and join the over 14 million all time customers who've already saved and invested over $25 billion with Acorns. Head to acorns.com offline or download the Acorns app to get started. Paid non client endorsement compensation provides incentive to positively promote Acorns tier one compensation provided investing involves risk. Acorns Advisors LLC and SEC registered investment advisor. View important disclosures@acorns.com offline this podcast is.
- [40:00]
C
Supported by Comedy Central's Emmy Award winning series the Daily Show. Jon Stewart and the Daily show news team are covering every minute of every hour of President Trump's second first 100 days in office with brand new episodes every weeknight. From the lowest lows to the highest lows and everything in between, they'll be there to break it all down. Comedy Central's the Daily show new tonight at 11 on Comedy Central and streaming next day on Paramount plus.
- [40:28]
Jon Favreau
All right. Last week the Financial Times published an incredible piece of offline bait. The article written by the Times's chief data reporter John Byrne Murdoch was titled have Humans Passed Peak Brain Power?
- [40:42]
Max Fisher
That's a great headline.
- [40:43]
Jon Favreau
And noted that research shows that, quote, the average person's ability to reason and solve novel problems appears to have peaked in the early 2000 and tens and has been declining ever since. And that the share of adults who are unable to use mathematical reasoning to review and evaluate the validity of statements is increasing. He also shares a study that's been asking 18 year olds since the early 80s whether they have difficulty thinking, concentrating or learning new things. The share of final year high school students who report difficulties was stable throughout the 1990s and the 2000s, but began a rapid upward climb in the mid 2010s and guess what? Adults show a similar pattern at the same time. Yep, right when everyone started using iPhones.
- [41:34]
Max Fisher
I know. I wonder what happened in the early 2010s.
- [41:36]
Jon Favreau
What do you think of that piece?
- [41:38]
Max Fisher
I mean this, this is kind of everything.
- [41:40]
Jon Favreau
I know.
- [41:41]
Max Fisher
I think this is, I mean it's everything we talk about with social isolation. It's people feeling more cynical. It's distrust of institutions, it's the right wing political drift. Like, I think something that is really important that this highlighted is not just when we started getting dumber and like, of course it's the phones, but it's like incredibly black and white but where we are getting dumber. The biggest drops were among teens. The biggest drop was in reading skills over other skills and adults. The drop in literacy was double the drop in facility with numbers. So we are really, it's like, why are we becoming dumber? It's the move into a post literate society. We are becoming less and less able to read. And I think a lot of that is shattered focus because we're addicted to our phones. And it's also the fact that we are being pulled away from the written word into video.
- [42:30]
Jon Favreau
Right. It's the video thing.
- [42:31]
Max Fisher
It is the video. And you hear like, you hear teachers talk about this, you hear professors talk about this, that their students, even the really smart ones, even in great schools, that they can't read a book.
- [42:40]
Jon Favreau
I think this is important too. And the reason I wanted to highlight the adults showing a similar pattern part is this is not enough. I mean so much of the conversation around phones is some of the criticism of the criticism of the phones and kids using the phones is like, oh, the old people are yelling at the kids again. And every generation has this. And it's, it's not limited, it's everybody to children. It's not Limited to teens. It's everyone. And we're focusing on teens because they are at the stage of life where most vulnerable. Where they're most vulnerable. And they're also, they're in school. Right. And so they're learning.
- [43:17]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [43:17]
Jon Favreau
But like, no, no. All the adults are getting dumber too.
- [43:20]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [43:20]
Jon Favreau
The phones are doing it to the adults too.
- [43:22]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [43:22]
Jon Favreau
And they all have a problem too. It's all of us.
- [43:24]
Max Fisher
It's disturbing to see this evidence that you can go from someone who knew how to read and who knew and I mean, like, obviously everyone still knows how to read, but someone who had the mental facility to spend a lot of time with the written word and you can lose that and you can drain that out of yourself. I absolutely just did this Focus Challenge where we were forcing ourselves to read for 20 minutes a day. And it was great. It was amazing. But it definitely took me a week or two to get back into it. I used to read a book every couple of weeks and it's like I have definitely started to lose that skill. But it is, I think it is the most, I agree. It's important to highlight we're not not kicking the zoomers or the teens. The drop among teens. There is this stat they report for U.S. teens. The percentage who hardly ever read in their free time has jumped from 15% to almost 50%. And it's going up. There's no reason to think it won't continue to go up. And this is important not just because it's like reading is nice and it's a good skill to have, but like, you know, we talk all the time about when you don't understand how things work. Everything looks like a conspiracy. Right. In a way that makes you very like prone to kind of right wing arguments about tear down the institutions. They're conspiring against you. And when you can't, I, I, I feel bad, keep saying can't read. But when you like cannot consume information through reading, you consume it through your phone, you consume it through a video. You're not getting the same high quality of information. You're not understanding how things work because you're not able to get that information because it's harder for you to access it. So you don't understand how things work. So it all feels like a conspiracy. It feels scary. And that makes you want to reach out and to smash all these systems that aren't working.
- [45:03]
Jon Favreau
And yes, the consequences for governance. Huge democracy, right? Huge. This is not just about your own mental health. It's not just about your own success in the world though. It is about that. But it is very much like as you start overlaying this on the voting patterns and election results and the gap between people who pay attention to the news and their politics and who are highly engaged versus the people who are not as engaged in their voting habits and how then it's not left right as much anymore but this sort of authoritarian populist crank.
- [45:46]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [45:47]
Jon Favreau
As Matt Iglesia calls it realignment versus like people who are still very engaged, who are more prone to, you know, supporting democracy and self governance. Like it's, I don't think it's disconnected.
- [46:01]
Max Fisher
Yeah. And it's, it's, it's both. You need to be able to read and to consume information through reading in order to be a responsibly engaged citizen. And also if you can't do that, you're going to default to social apps. Video driven social apps that as we've said many times, are controlled by a small number of companies that have a. We just as we just heard, a vested interest in lying to you and manipulating you and promoting things that are not true in ways that consistently pull people towards the right. And this just to like really underscore that we're not just beating up on like some other people who are like failing at being like, I feel this by.
- [46:41]
Jon Favreau
It's not like, oh, dumb people are right.
- [46:43]
Max Fisher
The dumb people are right.
- [46:44]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, like that this is not what we're saying here.
- [46:46]
Max Fisher
I feel it myself in and like I'm someone who like obsessively reads the newspaper. There are weeks where I'm not feeling good, I'm not feeling focused. So I get more news from my phone phone from social media. Instead of reading the newspaper, instead of reading a book. And what do you know, I feel confused. I don't understand what's going on. It seems like everybody's incompetent. It seems like there's, you know, the Democrats are deliberately failing. Makes me angry at everyone. It makes me want to kind of like throw all the bums out. And then I get some sleep and then actually read the newspaper again. And then it's like, okay, I understand what's happening here, but I have more of a handle on it. So we are all susceptible to it by degrees.
- [47:20]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, it's bad. It's bad. Offline is brought to you by Mint Mobile. Do you like keeping your money where you can see it? Unfortunately, traditional big wireless carriers seem to like keeping your money too. If you're fed up with crazy high wireless bills, bogus fees and free perks that actually cost more in the long run. It might be time to switch to Mint Mobile. We have a few crooked staffers who ditch their plans with the big wireless carriers and switched to Mint Mobile. One of them said they saved close to $40 per month after making the switch. Say bye to your overpriced wireless plans. Jaw dropping monthly bills and unexpected overages, Mint Mobile is here to rescue you with premium wireless plans starting at 15 bucks a month. All plans come with high speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the nation's largest 5G network. Use your own phone with any Mint Mobile plan and bring your phone number along with all your existing contacts. Ditch overpriced wireless and get three months of premium wireless from Mint Mobile for 15 bucks a month. If you like your money, Mint Mobile is for you. Shop plans@mintmobile.com offline that's mintmobile.com offline upfront payment of $45 for 3 month 5 gigabyte plan required equivalent to $15 per month new customer offer for first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. C Mint Mobile For Details this podcast.
- [48:36]
C
Is supported by Comedy Central's Emmy Award winning series the Daily Show. Jon Stewart and the Daily show news team are covering every minute of every hour of President Trump's second first 100 days in office, with brand new episodes every weeknight. From the lowest lows to the highest lows and everything in between, they'll be there to break it all down. Comedy Central's the Daily show, new tonight at 11 on Comedy Central and streaming next day on Paramount. Plus.
- [49:04]
Jon Favreau
Speaking of breaking our brains, let's end with the YouTube video that dominated our feeds this week. Sam Cedar Peter, host of the progressive Internet radio show and podcast the Majority Report, just starred in a now viral video titled 20 Trump supporters take on one progressive. The video is published by Jubilee, a popular YouTube channel, as part of its Surrounded series, which features one guest debating 10, 15 or 20 other people simultaneously. If you're curious about the logistics of how that works, you can check out the video on Jubilee's YouTube channel, the Logistics.
- [49:36]
Max Fisher
It's a bunch of chairs.
- [49:37]
Jon Favreau
You know what you have to see to believe it. But for our purposes today, I want to talk about some of the crazy conversations. Yeah, that poor Sam Cedar had to have, and the only way to explain them is with this very representative clip. DEI essentially provides tax cuts for the.
- [49:54]
Max Fisher
End of the year. When you create your tax returns, they give you a tax credit for hiring someone who is Black or a person of color.
- [50:00]
Jon Favreau
We're talking about government agencies that do.
- [50:03]
Max Fisher
Not get tax cuts.
- [50:05]
Jon Favreau
They don't. They. Government agencies.
- [50:08]
Max Fisher
They don't.
- [50:09]
Jon Favreau
No.
- [50:09]
Max Fisher
Yes, they do.
- [50:11]
Jon Favreau
They absolutely do.
- [50:12]
Max Fisher
I'm talking about the private and public.
- [50:15]
Jon Favreau
Sector gets tax cuts when you hire.
- [50:17]
Max Fisher
A person of color.
- [50:19]
Jon Favreau
Government agencies don't pay taxes. Government agencies operate, are funded by the government.
- [50:26]
Max Fisher
That is not true. That is not true. And you know what I think? I think the whole juxtapose of this entire conversation. What month is this? This is January. Okay.
- [50:37]
Jon Favreau
So we can agree on that.
- [50:42]
Max Fisher
Wow. Wow.
- [50:43]
Jon Favreau
Okay. So you and I both watched this.
- [50:45]
Max Fisher
It's upsetting.
- [50:46]
Jon Favreau
I, I knew this is our last topic. I was like, I'm gonna get some representative clips because it's an hour and a half. Yeah, I watched the whole thing. You know, I watched the whole thing.
- [50:55]
Max Fisher
And it's all like this.
- [50:58]
Jon Favreau
I have to say, it's a, it's a banger. I, I, I have totally turned around on it.
- [51:05]
Max Fisher
Really?
- [51:05]
Jon Favreau
I think it's great. I don't think it's great. I think it's fucking horrifying.
- [51:08]
Max Fisher
Sure. No, I understand.
- [51:10]
Jon Favreau
I have in the past, I have watched the one conservative debates.
- [51:15]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [51:16]
Jon Favreau
Here's the thing with it is that whoever the person that is, that the 20 people are debating is, that person is almost always more prepared, of course, and, and better at this than the other people.
- [51:27]
Max Fisher
That's kind of what you're watching.
- [51:29]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, that's yours for. So, like, my views on, you know, shaped by watching Charlie Kirk do it or whoever else they've had do it. Right, sure. This is the first one I've watched. I didn't watch the Pete Buddha jej1. I guess Pete's also done this and been the one person. And Dean Withers, who's been one of the participants at some point, he's been the. But watching Sam do it, I thought it was valuable because I was like, oh, these people are not very well informed, yet very smug about not being very well informed. Also, many of them very open about being like this one. One woman is like just a white nationalist, basically. She's like, yeah, what's wrong with xenophobic nationalism? She was literally a quote from her. And Sam Cedar's like, oh, oh, he like, you see him suddenly get it that that's who she is. And he's like, you know what? I'm not going to debate you on this. That's just, we just have a fundamental difference here. Yeah, but I kind of thought, like, and this, this was, I was Going to bring a take here that. That breaks Austin's brain, because Austin has been. Austin has been talking a lot. A lot.
- [52:30]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [52:30]
Jon Favreau
About Gavin Newsom's podcast.
- [52:31]
Max Fisher
I know he's really into Gavin Newsom's podcast.
- [52:34]
Jon Favreau
And my take is Gavin Newsom's podcast should be more like how Sam Cedar was debating these people.
- [52:40]
Max Fisher
I agree with that.
- [52:41]
Jon Favreau
Yeah. Because this was an edge. It was him exposing their ideas for what there are. And. And some of them made. I don't want to be too. Some of them made some good points here and there, and he took them apart. And I just thought it was more useful than, like, hey, how are you? And. And, like, tell me about maga.
- [52:58]
Max Fisher
I. I agree. What I will say for it is that I appreciated that he, Sam Cedar, seemed to see that the value here was not like an emotionally satisfying moment of, like, Sam Cedar dunks on conservatives and shuts them down, but rather, like, let's draw them out and see, like, what. What is going on inside the bubble that these people live within. And that is, I think, valuable and important. And I agree. I would love to see Gavin Newsom do that. I do think it's important to see, like, see it in context a little bit in the way that people actually hold beliefs and ideas, because I think there can be something a little bit. Misleading is not the right word, but when you kind of draw people out or when you confront, like, ask them what they believe and then confront them about it, they harden their views in a way that I think is. Is.
- [53:46]
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
- [53:47]
Max Fisher
Not necessarily representative of the way that. That people actually hold beliefs. Like, I think this is easy for someone like you or I or probably a lot of listeners of the show who are very high information, highly engaged in politics. Easy for us to miss is that we have, like, very discreet, clear views. They all fit together in a belief system. We know where they come from. There's an ideology behind it.
- [54:07]
Jon Favreau
We have a coherent worldview.
- [54:08]
Max Fisher
We have a coherent worldview, at least to us, maybe.
- [54:11]
Jon Favreau
Look, you might hate it, but it's.
- [54:12]
Max Fisher
You might hate it, but at least it's an ethos. Most people do not hold views that way. For most people, their views are. They're much squishier. They're much more softly defined. They might hold multiple contradictory beliefs and might hold multiple contradictory, quote, unquote facts in their head about the same topic.
- [54:32]
Jon Favreau
And again, no judgment on this necessarily.
- [54:34]
Max Fisher
Some.
- [54:34]
Jon Favreau
Some judgment for some people. But. But I'm not saying coherent, like, our view is better. I'm just saying it coheres. It literally coheres together. And many, most peoples do not.
- [54:42]
Max Fisher
Most people who are low information, it's. The beliefs are more symbolic. It's not. I literally believe. Now, once this guy was pressed on, do you literally believe that government agencies get tax cuts for, first of all pay taxes, which is crazy, and then get tax cuts for hiring people of color? He's going to harden that. And that is partly what I think can be, like, slightly misleading about this format is now it looks like he holds that view very strongly. But I think often when people express views like this, and this is true, people on the right and the left, just people who are like normal, low information, they mean it as kind of like, well, this is how I feel about hiring practices. And this is. I think that government agencies aren't representative enough. And I'm going to kind of express that in something that, like, doesn't actually make sense if you examine it. And so I, I don't. Look, I don't care if this guy got hardened in his beliefs or not. I do just think that it's worth keeping in mind when you see this, that in this context, they're going to look like very firm, concrete beliefs, but in any other context, they're probably not going to be expressed quite that way.
- [55:44]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, that is a, that is a very good point. And it is interesting that some of the, the, some folks on the right thought that, like, these kids destroyed Sam Cedar.
- [55:52]
Max Fisher
Did they really?
- [55:52]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, like on, on Twitter. That's like some of the discourse. Most people, I think, have judged it that Sam, you know, sort of wiped the floor with them. But again, I don't like who won or who didn't win or who got destroyed or who didn't is not actually what I found useful or interesting about it.
- [56:09]
Max Fisher
America got destroyed.
- [56:10]
Jon Favreau
America got destroyed. But even like Vulture did an interview with Sam, him afterwards about it, and, you know, he sort of talked about the experience and how he didn't know what he was walking into because they don't tell you who's going to be the people, who the people are in advance. He just walked in and just heard it.
- [56:25]
Max Fisher
And so who knows what the hell.
- [56:26]
Jon Favreau
Some of it truly shocked him and disturbed him and some of it he was, like, prepared for because he wrote, you write your own prompts, right? Like, it was like prompt number one. I think that Trump, Trump's policies hurt the working class and help the rich. Right, Whatever. That's the prompt. And then they argue about that. So he got to, he got to control that. He did say like when he was talking about the, he was talking with the woman who said what's wrong with xenophobic nationalism? He's like, and some views are so out there that I was like, I would just rather ex. I think that most of the country agrees with me and not her. So I'm not going to go into them.
- [56:59]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [56:59]
Jon Favreau
My only thought about that was not that I'm a, just, I guess I'm just a glutton for punishment, but I was like, I actually think that we are. And this is one of the reasons why I find I liked the video and liked the whole exercise is we are in a moment now where I think you do have to make the case for multiracial democracy.
- [57:17]
Max Fisher
I agree.
- [57:17]
Jon Favreau
100 and I think we've had this whole debate about we can't make the election about democracy because people care about, you know, cost of living and stuff like that. I think the chat. The, one of the problems there was is that debate was us saying democracy's obviously good.
- [57:35]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [57:35]
Jon Favreau
And trying to convince people that the other side hates democracy. Y and we actually have to make the case Y for why democracy is good and that is it. That could work better because it's not using the word democracy.
- [57:49]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [57:49]
Jon Favreau
But we have to make a case for the system. We have to make a case for a multiracial country.
- [57:55]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [57:55]
Jon Favreau
We have to make the case for all of these things because we think that they're basic. But like from that, from, from that 20 Trump supporters, right. Who were younger. Diverse. Yeah, diverse in terms of gender identity, sexual orientation. Race. Yeah, gender. Like I, I do think that Democrats or folks on the left or whoever you want to call us, like we, we have to get back to basics and, and trying to make the case for our worldview. Even the parts of our worldview that we, we assume most people agree with and maybe most people do agree with. But clearly we are seeing a younger generation now.
- [58:33]
Max Fisher
Right.
- [58:34]
Jon Favreau
And we can see this again in the voting data.
- [58:36]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [58:36]
Jon Favreau
Gen Z has took, took a hard, hard swing to the right.
- [58:39]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [58:40]
Jon Favreau
And maybe that's a one time thing, but I wouldn't bet on it. And it's, it's mostly men. Gen Z men. And I don't think that it is at least from these conversations. It's not just cultural, it's not just like the bros and we got to go on the BRO shows and all that kind of like, right. There are worldviews that these folks and other young people were espousing that are the MAGA cohesive worldview yeah. That I think we have to challenge.
- [59:06]
Max Fisher
Yeah.
- [59:06]
Jon Favreau
And we have to challenge, like, the fundamentals of it. Right. Like why xenophobic nationalism is bad.
- [59:12]
Max Fisher
Right. I have been saying since 2016 that I think that we have had a cultural narrative for a long time, not just the United States, but, like, broadly, in democracies, that we kind of won the argument on liberal democracy, on racial and cultural pluralism in the 1960s, and that it's over, and that we all agree that, you know, Martin Luther King Jr. Was right and that racism is bad, and that both democracy itself, like voting who voting freely and who your leaders are going to be, and then liberal democracy, more broadly defined as an equal rights for everyone, is just like the status quo and the default, and it's all the thing we want. And I think that that was never true.
- [59:54]
Jon Favreau
Yep.
- [59:54]
Max Fisher
I think that from the beginning, in the 60s, which is when we first instituted, like, real, full liberal democracy, there has been a movement that says, this is wrong. This is not what we want, but there has not been a channel for it. What has changed is that now, because of the way that primaries work, that they're open now that political parties are collapsing and their institutional authority, the way that media is now democratizing, there's now much more space for people to come together and find each other and say, wait a minute, we actually agree that we never liked this, that we never wanted liberal democracy, we never wanted pluralism. And we've got this competing vision that has been on the margins, or at least has felt like it's on the margins for so long that we all just wrote it off as, they're the bad guys. They're the baddies. And you say, well, you compare them to Nazis, and we all agree that Nazis were the bad guys in World War II. So of course we never want to be them. I don't know. Elon Musk did a Nazi salute. Well, it's all. It's all out there now.
- [60:48]
Jon Favreau
But also, I think one of the challenges is we. Oh, everyone knows Nazis are bad.
- [60:54]
Max Fisher
No, but then.
- [60:55]
Jon Favreau
But then, Elon. And you have. You've heard some other people say this too now that were like. Like, who's. Who's the one trying to be like, you know, the. The Nazis are bad, but the Nazis were actually communists.
- [61:05]
Max Fisher
That's. Oh, yeah. No, the Nazis are.
- [61:06]
Jon Favreau
The Nazis are actually leftists. Right. Like, so.
- [61:09]
Max Fisher
So for a long time that's been j.
- [61:11]
Jon Favreau
We think that just because everyone says everyone agrees that the Nazis are bad, that we agree that fascism is bad.
- [61:16]
Max Fisher
Exactly.
- [61:17]
Jon Favreau
But this movement now is saying, okay, they're trying to rewrite the past also. So because no one, no one in this movement is openly running around being like, yes, I hate everyone and I'm evil and evil's good. Like, they are thinking of themselves as the ones.
- [61:32]
Max Fisher
Right. They think we actually just want to save our culture.
- [61:34]
Jon Favreau
Yep. And we have to engage with those ideas and refute them as opposed to just assuming.
- [61:39]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [61:40]
Jon Favreau
That everyone agrees with us.
- [61:41]
Max Fisher
Right. And they see themselves as standing up for democracy because. And this is actually articulated well by the xenophobic white nationalist woman where her belief is that quote, unquote, we. Which of course is very loosely defined, but also clearly defined. You know, we are the majority, so we get to be in charge and we get to set what the culture is in her mind. And in the view of what you and I would call, you know, know, right wing ethnonationalism or right wing authoritarianism, that is actually saving democracy, which is actually something that Steven Levitsky gets really well. Is that the big movement against liberal democracy, as we understand it, comes from people who see themselves as saving it.
- [62:14]
Jon Favreau
Yep. And you. And you hear her, too. It's more like, well, we have just a European identity. That's the tradition of this country. And. And I have. I don't have a problem with the other people, but, like, they should have their country and we should have ours, and everyone should be able to do their own thing. And you're just like, oh, fuck, that's.
- [62:29]
Max Fisher
Always where this is.
- [62:30]
Jon Favreau
Yeah, this is where we're going.
- [62:32]
Max Fisher
Would you ever do one of these jubilee things? Because, I mean, you've done focus groups, but you don't. I assume you're not usually arguing.
- [62:37]
Jon Favreau
I have to say, focus groups. Sam was excellent. And I say, like, I think Sam has made fun of us a lot on Show America. I've heard, but I don't care. Honestly. He's a. He's really effective.
- [62:50]
Max Fisher
Yeah, he's very good.
- [62:50]
Jon Favreau
I'd rather. I don't need to be nice to me and. But I. But as I was listening to him like that, it's really hard. Hard to be the person.
- [62:57]
Max Fisher
Yes.
- [62:58]
Jon Favreau
And so you have to do a lot of prep. You have to know a lot of and like to be on your game like that with whoever you get and whatever crazy thing they be. And some people said some crazy things to him that I think he probably wasn't expecting. You could tell that a lot of arguments he was expecting because, of course, they're normal political arguments. And some things were Completely off the wall. Like the tax cuts for the government agencies, the dei. So you have to be prepared for that. So I don't know, like, I would need like, like a, like a couple weeks to not come to work easily. Yeah. And just prepare.
- [63:29]
Max Fisher
That was the. That was the. Beyond how distressing it was to see these views held by my fellow citizens. The thing that I found hardest to watch was I kept thinking like, oh, God, imagine being in that moment and having two seconds to craft the perfect response that is like rebuts it, counters it, but also redirects it. But also, you know, you're not saying anything.
- [63:49]
Jon Favreau
There's a lot of going home afterwards and doing a jerk store called kind of thing. How's that for a 90s Seinfeld reference?
- [63:55]
Max Fisher
I love it. I love it.
- [63:57]
Jon Favreau
All right, so that's our. That's our show for today. Max.
- [64:00]
Max Fisher
I enjoyed having Sarah Williams on In spirit.
- [64:03]
Jon Favreau
Yes.
- [64:03]
Max Fisher
And if she wants to come on. Not in spirit, please. I'll see you in Caracas once.
- [64:06]
Jon Favreau
Once you're legally allowed or Max will.
- [64:08]
Max Fisher
See you in Caracas, in Pyongyang.
- [64:10]
Jon Favreau
All right, we will. We'll see you all back here next week. Offline is a crooked media production. It's written and hosted by me, Jon Favreau, along with Max Fisher. The show is produced by Austin Fisher and Emma Illich Frank. Jordan Kanter is our sound editor. Audio support from Charlotte Landis and Kyle Seglin. Delon Villanueva produces our videos each week. Jordan Katz and Kenny Siegel take care of our music. Thanks to Ari Schwartz, Madeline Harringer and Adrian Hill for productions support. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East. Here at the Almond Joy Factory, where tropical vibes abound, we use soft, fresh.
- [65:14]
C
Tasting coconut, the crunchiest almonds, and delicious chocolate candy.
- [65:18]
Jon Favreau
Ah, but do you know what our.
- [65:20]
D
Most important ingredient is?
- [65:23]
Jon Favreau
Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't.
- [65:27]
Max Fisher
Almond Joy's got nuts. And something even way better than that.
- [65:31]
Jon Favreau
Yes, Almond Joy is made with almond. Join me, Dr. Panico with Cyndi Lauper and chef Michelle Bernstein to talk about plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The potential connection and risk of developing permanent joint damage.
- [65:52]
D
Cosentic Secukinumab is prescribed for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. 300 milligram dose.
- [65:58]
Max Fisher
Dose.
- [65:59]
D
And adults with active psoriatic arthritis. 150 milligrams dose. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentyx. Before starting, get checked for tuberculosis, an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal or viral infections, some are fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough, had a vaccine or planned to, or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, serious allergic reactions and severe eczema like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-cosentyx or cosentyx.com Cindy.