
Pete Hegseth isn’t the only one who loves a group chat—turns out Silicon Valley's descent into Trumpism was powered by a constellation of Signal and WhatsApp chats between America’s tech overlords. Max and Jon walk through the Marc Andreessen-powered phenomenon, then discuss how Jeff Bezos was forced to kiss Trump’s ring this week by walking back Amazon's response to his tariffs. Next up: how will Gen Z's lifestyle subsidy (cheap AI) compare to millenials’ lifestyle subsidy (cheap Ubers)? And finally, what’s the most disturbing way people are using AI chatbots…and why does it involve John Cena?
Loading summary
Jon Favreau
Offline is brought to you by Quints. You know when a new shirt just becomes your go to? That's what will happen when you pick up a few new pieces from Quint's. They'll be the first thing you reach for in your closet. Lightweight, comfortable, and always on point, Quint has all the things you actually want to wear, like organic cotton silk polos, European linen beach shorts, and comfortable pants that work for everything from backyard hangs to nice dinners. The best part, everything with quince is priced 50 to 80% less than what you'd find at similar brands. By working directly with top artisans and cutting out the middlemen, Quint gives you luxury pieces without the crazy markups. And Quint only works with factories that use safe, ethical and responsible manufacturing practices and premium fabrics and finishes. Got a bunch of T shirts from Quints before I went on spring break a couple of weeks ago. They were fantastic. Also got some. Some nice shorts and a couple polos. Great, great stuff. Elevate your closet with quints. Go to quints.com offline for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Q U I N C E.com offline to get free shipping and 365 day returns.
Max Fiser
Quint.com offline this kind of AI newsroom, I think, is not going to be a thing where it's. He's not even really creating an AI newsroom. He's creating AI friends, which is like, it's kind of a bummer.
Jon Favreau
Sad. Yeah. Very sad.
Max Fiser
Yeah. Look, he's been retired for a while. I think maybe he just needs to, like, get out and get a hobby of, like, just go golf or something.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. If you walked outside, everywhere you look, there's people and. And they're real and you can talk to them.
Max Fiser
Should be the tagline for this podcast. Everywhere you see, if you go outside, there's people. It's a much nicer way of saying touch grass.
Jon Favreau
I'm Jon Favreau.
Max Fiser
I'm Max Fiser.
Jon Favreau
Max, simple question. How many secret group chats are you in with Mark Andreessen?
Max Fiser
Not so many since I called him out for his Trump derangement syndrome.
Jon Favreau
That's. That'll do it. We have got on these secret group chats that may or may not have changed politics forever. As part of our very full show for today, we'll also talk about three increasingly disturbing ways people are using AI chatbots and discuss whether ChatGPT and Super Grock or Gen Z's lifestyle subsidy. What a sentence similar to what we superior millennials enjoyed during the heyday of cheap Ubers and fee free doordash. But first, let's talk about those group chats. When we answered some listener questions last week, we got one from Handle with Claire. Again, great name, love it. That asked us which historic group chats we'd like to have been added to. Turns out to have been a prophetic question since Ben Smith just published a great piece in Semaphore detailing the, quote, group chats that changed America. In it, Ben reveals that the tech elite's realignment towards Trumpism was powered by a constellation of group chats on Signal and WhatsApp, where Silicon Valley moguls have chatted daily with right wing intellectuals like Ben Shapiro, Tucker Carlson and Curtis Yarvin. These group chats apparently started in 2020 after Marc Andreessen and Sriram Krishnan, a former partner at Andreessen's VC firm who now serves as the White House Senior Policy advisor for AI, began adding Silicon Valley elites to group chats to discuss an essay Andreessen authored about patriotic industry and innovation. Initially, the group chats contained both right and left leaning voices. Some still do, with Mark Cuban apparently popping up in one. But over time, Ben notes that the conversations became increasingly pro. Trump and Andreessen began creating groups where Silicon Valley elite could text, specifically with, quote, smart right wing people. Ben spoke to a couple of these group chats participants, including Krishnan, who told him that the group chats are, quote, memetic upstream of mainstream opinion.
Max Fiser
It's an annoying way to put it, but I don't know that he's wrong.
Jon Favreau
AKA what happens in these group chats is bleeding out to social media and into our politics. I mean, yes, yeah, yeah, true. Most important question to start with, Are you offended we haven't been added to any of these group chats? I.
Max Fiser
Speak for yourself, man. Oh fuck. I. Look, I can't. I can't reveal my participation in this or any other top secret group chats. I will just say if you see Tucker Carlson suddenly talking on a show about the importance of consumer level tech regulation or the great films of Sidney Lumet, then maybe there's someone in there providing a good influence. I don't know.
Jon Favreau
Tucker Carlson, Chaos Machine Reader. I am not in any of these group chats. There are. I don't know. I was gonna say I don't know of any on our side, but that just reveals that maybe there are. And I'm not.
Max Fiser
I was gonna say we had a conversation about this in our meeting where you revealed something about your participation in group chats, or lack thereof, that really.
Jon Favreau
Surprised me that I'm not in one of these.
Max Fiser
I thought that you were going to be in like all the like elite tier group chats. I was, I was literally worried we might not be able to have the conversation because you were going to be like, oh my group chats are so sensitive. They're like top secret classified that I actually can't even discuss the concept of group chats.
Jon Favreau
I have many group chats. They are quite small.
Max Fiser
Okay.
Jon Favreau
And the, the one that exclusive, exclusive, the one that I am in all day long is with my close friends from Obama World who are here, many of them here in this company. Pfeiffer, Rhodes, Tommy, Cody, Keenan. We're just all. We started it like right after we left the White House.
Max Fiser
That's a group chat of progressive elites. Progressive media elites. That's what it is. Everybody thinks theirs doesn't count because it's just a friend group.
Jon Favreau
Yeah, I guess. Well, but look, this sounds very. Not diverse, but like it's far flung. Some of the people. Yeah, like you've got Mark Andreessen, Mark Cuban, David Shore is in one, Larry Summers, and then. And the Harper's Letter signatories. Right. So this one seems pretty big.
Max Fiser
It seems like there was a deliberate effort to cultivate what they wanted to be the kind of new governing intellectual elite of America.
Jon Favreau
And that I have not, I have not seen an equivalent of that again, on, on our side though. Maybe I just have not been invited. What about you? Are you.
Max Fiser
The progressive left is, is famously pretty fractured right now. I think that a lot of these group chats do exist. I'm in a couple, just like progressive journalists. We're not pulling any strings, we're not driving any narratives, whatever. That's not really how it works. But you do see its effects start to play out where the, like the things that you were preoccupied with in your group chat then get reflected out in your work or in the posting that you do on social media. And if you're in a group chat with a bunch of people who are influential in media politics, then I think that can. I think each one individually kind of plays into a larger ecosystem of group chats. That is really influential.
Jon Favreau
Ben makes a pretty strong case that these group chats were the catalyst for tech's current right wing political realignment. What do you make of that argument?
Max Fiser
I, I think totally true. I mean there's obviously there's never going to be any one cause for something as big as this, and we've talked about the other causes for people like Marc Andreessen specifically, who's kind of at the center of this group chat and was at the center of the Silicon Valley turn towards Trump, where it was also, you know, a reaction against Biden Tech regulations and Biden wouldn't bail out Silicon Valley bank, and Trump was willing to let them do all these crypt scam. So it's not just like, oh, it was the group chat all along. And to some degree, Mark Andreessen has, like, always been this guy, and it's always been waiting for it to come out. But I do think that there's really something to the idea that the dynamics of group chats and the way that they work, especially for people who are also very heavily on social media, so they kind of have them up side by side, really do, like, drive people's politics and the way that they think and talk to one another and who that they're talking to in a way that I think really did channel this specific group towards Trumpism. And, like, you can see it in the kind of narrative that Ben Smith traces for the Mark Andreessen group chats, where it starts with, like, everybody's group chat starts in 2020 with the pandemic. We're not seeing people in real life, so we, you know, add them all on a group chat. And the things that were concerning the Marc Andreessen, like, Silicon Valley venture capitalist group chats at that point were like, being annoyed by wokeness, basically, and like, their employees were asking them to take stands for Black Lives Matters in ways that they found kind of annoying and like, maybe we' of annoying. And, you know, they were upset about San Francisco's political leadership, which does seem like it was, like, not very great at that point. So you kind of see how they start somewhere where it's like, ah, that's not actually so crazy. But then the way that group chats work is that you kind of have these obsessions or these feuds with people on social media, and you get yourself into this little bubble and you talk one another.
Jon Favreau
Yes, exactly.
Max Fiser
Hardening that into your entire worldview, into your, like, entire sense of identity. And clearly, like, some other people got folded in the group chats that were, like, influential in shaping how that went. But it's just like, it's not people coming to the group chat saying, let's use this to pull the strings of American life.
Jon Favreau
I was gonna say that that is important and why It's a perfect offline topic. Yes, that it is. I Don't think it is. The, the most conspiratorial version is, yeah, we're all gonna be here and we're very powerful. Right. And so we're gonna pull the strings and co and stuff like that. What happens in a group chat is the way consensus is formed. To the extent that consensus is formed is you're all talking about the same stuff. I mean, for me, group chat is like, it's all day long. It's like posting pieces and then being like, isn't this crazy? Or can you believe this? Or what do you think about this piece? Right. And we're all just commenting on the piece and there are disagreements. But at least for me, because it's your friends, the disagreements are like respectful or you don't want to be a dick, you know?
Max Fiser
Yeah.
Jon Favreau
And then you do end up, just by osmosis, organically kind of coming around to the same opinion, general opinion, but it also happened. It's very funny because sometimes I'll notice, like, there'll be a piece in our group chat and without talking to each other about it independently, I'll just go on Twitter and it's like Dan and Tommy have posted almost the exact same tweet, but it's just because we all saw it at the same time and then went off and then went down post it. And people are like, are you guys coordinating that? It's like, no, we're not. We just happened to see it at the same time.
Max Fiser
Do you know what this reminds me of?
Jon Favreau
What?
Max Fiser
Do you remember when, like in 2017, when Pod Save America was first getting big and I made a Twitter joke at the expense of you and the other co founders of Pod Save America.
Jon Favreau
Do you remember that?
Max Fiser
You remember this?
Jon Favreau
No, I don't hold.
Max Fiser
I mean, that's true. Especially not on social media. No, I made some joke about, like. And I know everybody has made this joke about how I get you confused because you all are white guys with three letter names and all three of you simultaneously pointed out a pretty good counter to that, which. I'm a white guy with a three letter name. Yes. But it was the fact that all memory of doing it, you tweeted at me at the exact same time. It was like, oh, this got dropped in the group chat.
Jon Favreau
That's so funny. And maybe it did, and I don't even know.
Max Fiser
Well, it was a funny little exchange, but it was like, it was a good group chat moment.
Jon Favreau
And it's now called Houthi PC Small Group Chat.
Max Fiser
That's true.
Jon Favreau
There was. There were Some. There were some funny names in there. One of them was. One of them was called Matt Iglesias Fan Club.
Max Fiser
I know someone who has many group ch is the subject of many group chats.
Jon Favreau
I bet, I bet there's like the Biden Reelect Committee to Reelect Biden, which I thought was pretty funny too. Yeah, but it is, it's funny.
Max Fiser
What happened.
Jon Favreau
So, like, you know, the Harper's letter. We don't have to talk about the whole Harper's Letter, but it was.
Max Fiser
Thank you.
Jon Favreau
But the people who signed the Harper's letter was like maybe too much, too much censorship. And so you had some center, maybe center left people in there. They started joining, but then they all ended up getting kicked out because they weren't right wing enough. And then apparently in mid April, once Liberation Day happened and tariffs hit. Ben writes in the piece, by mid April, David Sacks had had enough with Chatham House. One of them was called Chatham House. This group has become worthless since the loudest voices have tds. He wrote Trump derangement Syndrome. And then he said, you should create a new one with just smart people. He said to Torrenberg. And then signal right after that. And Ben has the screenshot of this, which funny signal shows that three men leave the group after Sack says that. And it's Sean Maguire, Tyler Winklevoss and Tucker Carlson.
Max Fiser
Yeah. When, when Tyler Winklevoss left our group chat, it was a real blow, a real, real blow to the memes and the comedy and the. Yeah. I mean, it's a great illustration of the way that every group chat inevitably funnels itself towards consensus and group, even if there is disagreement within it, like funnels itself towards points of commonality that they then like build up into. And like every group chat thinks of itself as the like, Republic of letters, which Mark Andreessen's like, of course, his group chat called itself that too. Which is. It's like, oh, we found the pure intellectual space that's away from the group. Think of social media and censoriousness. And we speak the unspoken truth.
Jon Favreau
I definitely don't think that about any of my group chats. None of my group chats have that vibe in any. It is, it is jokes.
Max Fiser
Yeah.
Jon Favreau
Maybe things that aren't appropriate for social media.
Max Fiser
Sure.
Jon Favreau
And yelling about stuff.
Max Fiser
You. But you don't find that. I really find that my group chats do develop a little bit of a dynamic of like. Well, you can't say this on social media, but we all know it's true.
Jon Favreau
Oh, yeah, yeah. There's a little bit of that for sure. No, I do think that's an important dynamic too, is how these have sprouted up like in opposition almost, or as a substitution for social media. And I think it's easy, at least in this instance to. To say that it's about, you know, you can't say this censorship left too woke and other. But I think there's a variety of reasons that Twitter has just become a fucking hellscape. We've talked about all that a million times. Most other. And so what feels safe? Your group chat feels safe because it's your friends and you don't have to deal with like annoying people popping up and yelling at you about shit.
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
Whether you were supposed to say it or not. It's just, you know.
Max Fiser
Right. There was a. An example of the way that this specific dynamic drove the like Mark Andreessen group towards Trumpism and the right that it didn't make it into Ben's piece. But I wanted to bring it up because I remember this being a really big thing in 2020. Do you remember the blow up over away luggage company?
Jon Favreau
No.
Max Fiser
Do you remember this? It was like a Silicon Valley startup and they made luggage.
Jon Favreau
I have all bunch of AWAY luggage.
Max Fiser
Oh, you do?
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
Okay, well, I am sorry to report that it is problematic. I'm kid. The luggage is fine. There were story. It's fine. We're canceling. John. There were stories that came out in 2020 that the founder and president or the founder and CEO had some like problematic behavior.
Jon Favreau
Basically never heard this. I.
Max Fiser
It's fine, fine. You can still use the lights.
Jon Favreau
I'm throwing it all away. Okay, don't worry.
Max Fiser
Anyway, there were a bunch of news stories about this. It became like a big thing. It was like very damaging to the company. People in Silicon Valley and especially in Mark Andreessen circles were very upset about this because away, I guess was funded with a lot of tech VC money. And also the woman who was at the center of this was like friends with them. So they all got really, really upset about it. And there was this dynamic that played up because their group chats were like semi public at this point. They were in clubhouse. Yeah, it was started by Mark Andreessen, of course. And it was so they could all hear themselves talk. They could all literally just. It was just a conference call. Yes. But on these group chats run by Andreessen and his like business partners and buddies, they got obsessed with like this unfair character assassination by the media against the founder of away and they talk themselves into like, oh, it's because the media is deliberately attacking startups because they're jealous of Silicon Valley's success and they're mad at us because we are doing their job better than them and we're taking away their business. Business. And they talk themselves into.
Jon Favreau
These people suck.
Max Fiser
They do suck. Yes.
Jon Favreau
See, I'm saying that on air. I don't even say it in the group chat. They suck.
Max Fiser
Yes. That is, that is a take we can bring outside of the group chat. We will say it in the group chat too. And that in the, like, group chat dynamics of it, it was like, we're being persecuted by our enemies in the media. And Mark Andreessen, off of that specifically, that was when he started his Bing campaign to like everyone in Silicon Valley. We have to blacklist the media. Don't cooperate with them, don't talk to them, nobody.
Jon Favreau
That's when he blocked everyone on Twitt.
Max Fiser
It's when he blocked everyone on Twitter.
Jon Favreau
So I was like, I've never talked to him in my life. All of that, I was blocked by him. I'm like, I've never interacted with this person.
Max Fiser
Well, you're not missing much, I have to tell you. And that was when his, like, one of his lieutenants, who was also in these group chats, started paying bitcoin to people if they would harass reporters who had scoops that were bad about Silicon Valley. And then that trickled up to just to like, show the effects of this. Shortly after that, Mark Zuckerberg gave this big speech internally at Facebook about how the media is our enemy. They hate our success and they want to take us down. I don't even know that Zuckerberg was in those group chats, but the point is that, like, something happens out in the real world in Twitter. It gets refracted through these specific dynamics of group chats and then it ends up mattering. And that happened. I think the away luggage stuff just happened to our politics.
Jon Favreau
For you, that's an interesting story. Offline is brought to you by Zebiotics. Pre Alcohol. Let me tell you, if there's a surefire way to wake up feeling fresh after drinks with friends, it's with pre alcohol Zebiotics. Pre Alcohol Probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration. That's to Blame for rough days after drinking. Pre alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre alcohol your first drink of the night. Drink responsibly and you'll feel your best tomorrow. This ad is a reminder for me to pack a few Zebiotics now that we're going to D.C. for the correspondence center weekend, you know. Yeah, gotta have those Zebiotics. Spring is here, which means more opportunities to celebrate warmer weather before drinks on the patio, that tropical vacation or your best friend's wedding. Don't forget your Zebiotics Pre alcohol. Drink one before drinking and wake up feeling great the next day. Go to zebiotics.com offline to learn more and get 15% off your first order. When you use offline at checkout. Zebiotics is backed with 100% money back guarantee, so if you're unsatisfied for any reason, they'll refund your money, no questions asked. Remember to head to zebiotics.com offline and use the code offline at checkout for 15% off.
C
At Hotels.com, we know some travelers crave sand between their toes. Others want to be poolside with a drink on the way. And more often than not, those two people end up in a relationship. With the hotels.com app. Compare properties side by side across amenities like pool and ocean view. Compromise isn't so bad when you're holding a Mai Tai bio pool with an ocean view. Agreeing that, yeah, this is better than finding sand in aquarium places for three days. Book now in the hotels.com app and find your perfect somewhere.
Jon Favreau
Speaking of Andreessen, this is neither here nor there, but have you seen the. The clip that's been going around today of Marc Andreessen?
Max Fiser
I have. Unfortunately, yes. I hate everyone that I see.
Jon Favreau
It's. It's in all the group chats, by the way.
Max Fiser
It's. It was in mine. That was how I saw it.
Jon Favreau
I've multiple group chats, which is ironic and awesome. And he says when AI does everything else, VC might be one of the last jobs still done by humans. Vc.
Max Fiser
I know. Give me a break.
Jon Favreau
Yes. Yeah, the money hose.
Max Fiser
This. I mean, this is. It's perfect group chat dynamics.
Jon Favreau
Because gambling, right?
Max Fiser
Rich. Right? Rich people gambling with someone else's money.
Jon Favreau
Where they don't even absorb some of my best friends. All of you. All of you that are vulnerable VCs. Not all of you. Not all.
Max Fiser
Yeah. You're gonna hear about this in the group chat later, aren't you?
Jon Favreau
Like I said, one of my favorite Twitter accounts is VCs congratulating themselves which is a very funny. This is the best, this is maybe the best example I've ever seen. Mark Andreessen thinks that he is the most necessary. What he does is the most necessary function that can never be replaced by computers.
Max Fiser
High minded thing that it could never be. I know. Which I don't. You know what do we want a VC bot even?
Jon Favreau
Isn't that what we have? Who would you add to your elite group chat?
Max Fiser
Oh my God. Progressive millennials with a sense of humor. Aoc obviously. I feel like it's everyone's number one draft pick. Santa Mar in the former Finnish prime minister seems like a cool Hank. Young filmmakers like Robert Eggers, Ryan Coogler. And you know what, I gotta be honest. My number one pick for the group chat, Kim Jong Un. You know Kim Jong Un, he's got a sense of humor. He seems like a weird guy, probably says crazy stuff and he's probably got all these like laborers in the content mind coming up with incredible memes.
Jon Favreau
Wow, I didn't think about that. I don't even. I, I, I. You would like to took this seriously. Of course. Like you.
Max Fiser
Oh, that's nice. I mean we could just start a group chat.
Jon Favreau
Couple New York Times columnists. I don't know. No, now that I'm thinking about it, I don't know. Maybe we could get some like JD Vance, Elon Musk, all my favorite Stephen Miller, all my favorite Twitter.
Max Fiser
That's true. I mean you're chatting with these guys all the time.
Jon Favreau
Maybe I should take it to the group chat and not do it. Not do it?
Max Fiser
Honestly, what if you did that and it fixed American governance. Don't think that the group chat give and the group chat take away.
Jon Favreau
One billionaire who appears to not be in the group chats. Jeff Bezos, a great transition Punchbowl News reported on Tuesday morning that his E commerce giant Amazon was exploring showing added tariff costs next to products on its site. I was so excited when I saw this report. I was so excited. And it turns out it was too good to be true.
Max Fiser
It was.
Jon Favreau
The report quickly drew the ire of the White House with Press secretary Caroline Levitt later that morning calling that decision a quote, hostile and political act. President Trump reportedly then called Bezos to complain about the news report. And quickly thereafter, Amazon released a statement saying that listing import charges on the site was never being seriously considered. They said some people were discussing it for Amazon hall, which is a site that competes directly with temu, which is a Chinese retailer that people have been using to get around some of the tariff stuff.
Max Fiser
And Timo has been doing this, which is why Amazon hall.
Jon Favreau
Right. Exactly. So what do you make of the Trump administration's speedy pushback on this and Jeff Bezos being like. Of course.
Max Fiser
I mean, I think that they realize that Bezos effectively has a big red button in his office that says press this button to erase five points from Trump's approval rating overnight. And like, I don't think that Bezos wants that button and I don't think that he wants to push it. But they realize that it's there and in the process they called everyone's attention. The fact that it's there.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
Which seems really stupid.
Jon Favreau
And also I would really think you'd.
Max Fiser
Want to downplay this instead of calling everyone's attention to how bad it would be if people knew what they are doing to your consumer prices.
Jon Favreau
Well, and then the question is how bad does it have to get for Amazon Right. With the trade war to do this. That he realizes that by pushing the button and pissing Trump off, the damage that Trump could do to him.
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
Because he'd get mad. Yeah. Is weighing that against just the continued damage of the, of the tariffs.
Max Fiser
It's interesting because Trump world clearly thinks that they can go after Bezos because they pressured him before based as an inch. Ownership of the Washington Post. But the thing is the Washington Post loses money.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. So it's like Washington Post is like a rounding error. And he clearly doesn't give a shit about the a. He's not a fucking journalistic hero.
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
Cares about the free press.
Max Fiser
Right. I mean he does. I, I will. Look, is, is a, is a. Ish. Yes. Bezos is a. Is a just another tech CEO cuck who has like cucked himself to Trump. And it's all very shameful. But I, he is the one Silicon Valley CEO who has cucked themselves to Trump to. I am the least unsympathetic to. Because he does continue to lose a lot of money on the Washington Post every year in order to fund journalism. And I think that that's nice. But, but my, my point is that I think Trump world thought like, oh, we can pressure him by going after his businesses, but Amazon is actually where he makes all of his money.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
And like that is the one thing that he clearly cares about most is his finances and the number of zeros. That is his net worth.
Jon Favreau
And that's what's getting hit. And that's what's going to be hit.
Max Fiser
Is going to be hit really, really hard if this stuff continues. Now, I don't. It's very hard for me to imagine Bezos doing this because it would be a really big move. I mean, I don't think that it's. It's wrong necessarily for Trump world to say this would be a political act. Now, that doesn't mean it's wrong. I think that it's good for them to call attention to what Trump is doing to consumer prices.
Jon Favreau
I hate doing this, but I'm gonna do it.
Max Fiser
Okay.
Jon Favreau
If it was Joe Biden's trade war or Barack Obama's trade war or Kamala Harris's trade war, you don't think Jeff Bezos would put up the prices on Amazon?
Max Fiser
Of course. Right? I know it's different. If it's a different. Of course he's afraid.
Jon Favreau
Of course.
Max Fiser
That's always been.
Jon Favreau
He's afraid. There's also, I think there's a calculus that these guys, like, if it gets really bad, these guys can walk them. Can help walk them back.
Max Fiser
Yes.
Jon Favreau
Or, or they'll have the power to walk them back, which I, you know, everyone. Everyone. I know everyone keeps thinking this. I know I'm in the, like, who knows? I mean, Trump just said at his cabinet meeting today on China, they made a trillion dollars. With Biden selling us stuff, much of it we don't need. Somebody said, oh, the shelves are going to be open. Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls. And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple bucks more.
Max Fiser
You know what Americans love is having less. They, they love living in austerity wartime conditions for literally no reason whatsoever.
Jon Favreau
I think this talk about, like, closed information loops and bubbles.
Max Fiser
I know.
Jon Favreau
I think that they, Trump and the people around him, with the exception of Scott Besson, who has probably hear it from angry Wall street people all the time, right. Are just like, no, this is what we want to do.
Max Fiser
Right?
Jon Favreau
Because we want to fuck the global economy. And, and we don't care about the damage because we're rich.
Max Fiser
I thought you could really see it in Leavitt's response to Amazon, too, where she, she had this ridiculous claim that, like, oh, well, Americans know that Amazon partners with Chinese propaganda arms. And what she pointed to was they. Did you see this where she pointed to a story from four years ago where Amazon, I guess it was its service in China, where they complied with a government demand to take down some reviews of a product. Product. Something like that.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
And it was like, I don't know, didn't seem like particularly egregious. And it's also what you're describing that you're so offended by Amazon doing is the entire business model of TikTok, a company that you're going way, way out of your way to protect and by.
Jon Favreau
Yeah, you're violating a Supreme Court order in a, in a right. In a law passed by Congress.
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
This is, this is the thing. I really see this like dovetailing with all of the TikTok stuff where like Trump opened this door when you say we are not going to play by the rule of law anymore and we're not going to regul businesses based on even pretending to follow the law or the courts were just going to do it. On this kind of like day to day chaotic bare knuckle brawl, you open the door for the possibility that another company might play the same game back at you. Which like we mentioned Teemo and she and the two big Chinese fast fashion companies, they are already doing the thing that they falsely accused Amazon of doing, which is if you go onto their apps, which I personally don't, but a lot of younger people do, you will see a little thing in the bottom that says, you know, this is what you're paying for the tariffs and it's like 145% market up.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. And that's, it's, it's one of those things that will catch them off guard.
Max Fiser
Because it's like they don't expect anyone to.
Jon Favreau
It's like bubbling, it's sort of all. It's like the reverse of us in, in the last election being like, what happened to Gen Z?
Max Fiser
Yeah.
Jon Favreau
Have they been right? You know, and it's like. Well, a lot of them are just like, everything's expensive.
Max Fiser
Yes. Right.
Jon Favreau
This guy's old and a lot of things are expensive. He doesn't seem to be doing anything about it.
Max Fiser
I do think that they really, they drank their own Kool Aid and got higher in their own supply. That not just their supporters, but young people especially like, oh, young people love Trump now.
Jon Favreau
Yeah, right. Speaking of young people, in other news, the Atlant. Look at that. Look at that transition.
Max Fiser
Just another, another great transition.
Jon Favreau
Love it when it comes together. In other news, the Atlantic's Lila Shroff published a piece last week titled the Gen Z Lifestyle Subsidy about the ways AI companies are luring Gen Z college students into using their premium services with free deals. The places offering these deals like OpenAI, which are currently wildly unprofitable, are reminiscent of the Millennial Lifestyle subsidy, which is basically when Ride hailing and delivery apps bled money as they tended to scoop up Millennial customers with cheap prices. She notes that many students are already hooked on these apps, and she expects in the long run, AI companies will hike prices on their Gen Z consumers and everyone else, just as Uber and Lyft did on their Millennial customers. For people who may not be familiar with the Millennial Lifestyle subsidy, can you take us down memory lane and talk to us about that?
Max Fiser
So, like you said, this is a period of roughly like 2008 to 2020, when DoorDash ClassPass is another one.
Jon Favreau
Oh, yeah.
Max Fiser
Anything you had like an app on your phone to order were really cheap. And that was because these companies were operating on a very specific Silicon Valley funding model that took advantage of something called zirp, which is zero interest rate policy. And interest rates were very low. They endlessly borrowed money because borrowing money was free to operate at a loss on every sale because their goal was not to make money on the ride sharing service. The goal was to get as many, many people using the app as possible in order to beat out other competitors. So, like, every time you called an Uber, you might pay 15, the ride actually cost 25. Uber was paying for the other 10 based on these zero interest loans that they took out, which worked great for a long time because everyone got these really cheap services. And that was the Millennium Lifestyle Subsidy. But we could only afford to use those services all the time the way that we did, because interest rates were so low. Once they pop back up after the pandemic, companies couldn't subsidize those prices with free money anymore, and they had to jack up the prices. All of a sudden you open up Uber, DoorDash, whatever. You're seeing the actual price for the service you're using. And this was very disruptive to a lot of people because people had spent years getting accustomed to using these things all the time. Right. So instead of developing a habit to commute on your bike to work, just as an example or take the bus, you get used to taking Uber all the time. You, a lot of people, I think, didn't learn how to cook cook because they were getting, you know, doordash burrito every day. I, I, you do, you do also get coffee delivered?
Jon Favreau
I get it, yeah.
Max Fiser
No, no friction here.
Jon Favreau
No friction.
Max Fiser
But like, all of the, like, pandemic discourse about, like, I need my doordash to survive, a lot of that was the Millennium Lifestyle subsidy was always going to go away, and it just went away very quickly. That led to a lot of political disruption. People got really mad because it happened the same time as inflation. So in people's minds, like Biden caused, you know, door dash burritos to go from something you could afford to do three times a week to something you could only afford to do every other week. And that, what this piece made, I thought the very good and insightful point about is that a lot of Gen Z folks are now getting addicted to a new generation of services that are likewise subsidized by these tech companies. Taking a loss and every use, and inevitably those prices are going to go up and it's going to be very disruptive.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. And two things from this piece stood out to me. The first is just how much Gen Z is already using.
Max Fiser
Scary. Yeah.
Jon Favreau
And it says, you know, they're using the technology to help with more than schoolwork. Some people are integrating AI into their lives in more fundamental ways. Creating personalized workout plans, generating grocery lists, asking chatbots for romantic advice. Hold on. That. And, and so it is very integrated already into people's lives. And also how wildly unprofitable. Yes, AI is. So far. Like, this is. This seems like it's a, this is a, this is a bubble in the making here.
Max Fiser
Right? I mean, order was making some money on every ride or bringing in some revenue. A lot of These companies, like OpenAI, they don't even sell that many services from the piece.
Jon Favreau
Just last week, Sam Altman, the startup CEO, suggested that his company spends tens of millions of dollars processing please and thank you messages from users. Tack on the cost of training these models, which could be as much as $1 billion for the most advanced versions, and the price tag becomes ever more substantial. In January, Altman said that OpenAI was actually losing money on its $200 a month pro subscription this year. The company is reportedly projected to burn nearly $7 billion in a few years. That number could grow as much as to as much as $20 billion.
Max Fiser
It's crazy. Crazy.
Jon Favreau
Like how are you gonna.
Max Fiser
Now we all know that money is running out at some point.
Jon Favreau
We do. Like, as the technology advances, it'll probably be cheaper to process. You won't be spending tens of millions of dollars to process please and thank yous ideally, or else they're fucked. But like, I don't, I don't know where this is going.
Max Fiser
I mean, it, it, it's disturbing for a number of reasons. One is that you see Silicon Valley continuously backing itself into this corner where it makes its services free to get people to sign up for it. But then people are accustomed to the service being free so then, or heavily subsidized so then you can't charge people for it. Like that is how we ended up with social media destroying the world. Because you know, companies like Facebook and YouTube and Twitter, they don't have a way to actually make money on consumers. So they just need to sell ads. They need to get more and more addictive in order to sell enough ads. I don't know if OpenAI or companies like it are going to go the doordash route where they just have to start increasing prices on people until the service is actually sustainable or if they're going to start going the Facebook route, which is where they're going to keep the services free but start selling ads against it. Which means, you know, that's basically like the worst possible outcome because it means making the services really addictive because then the consumers are no longer the actual customers, they are the product.
Jon Favreau
And how do you, this is what I was worried about reading at all is how, how do you make a product more addictive?
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
You make the products need to serve the customer. You prioritize that above all else. Right, Right. And so what is artificial intelligence supposed to do? It's supposed to give you facts and information and it should be a tool to make life easier. But it, there can't be any friction with it. It can't be like telling you hard truths. Casey Newton just wrote one of his newsletter on like AI flattery. And when you look at the. And we'll talk about this with some of these chat bots that we're going to talk about soon. But when I've noticed this, when you start using it enough and it starts like remembering you, you, everything you're doing is great and it's telling you you're wonderful and it, you know, that is.
Max Fiser
Going to not necessarily useful service.
Jon Favreau
Not necessarily useful service.
Max Fiser
Yeah. Like when we talked about chatbots being used for therapy and like I really want to be sympathetic to that because that is a need that a lot of people have. But I worry that it is convincing people it's giving them therapy when it's actually giving them something that feels easy in the moment.
Jon Favreau
Yes. And when is, when is your chat bot going to tell you you hard truth or give you like honest criticism? Although I guess we took some honest criticism from Levit's chat bot.
Max Fiser
Did we?
Jon Favreau
But a lot of these that are just like that the kids are using and that everyone's using now is I just, I think that in the back of my mind is what Happened with social media.
Max Fiser
Yes. Right, Absolutely.
Jon Favreau
Which is all the wrong incentives. The algorithm prioritizes all the worst, indulging all our worst instincts. And, and it, it does feel like ChatGPT AI is going to supercharge that in a pretty scary.
Max Fiser
I, I really. The aspect of this that I really worry about, and I'm going to sound like such a scold saying this. I'm going to sound so tedious, but is homework.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
And there are so many stories you hear about, like, teachers getting, you know, every homework assignment comes back, it's clearly written by AI. You know, I saw this tweet the other day that has really stayed with me about someone being on a flight light next to a kid who had. I can't remember who said it was in high school, junior high, or appeared to be about that age, that he had an essay he had to write for school. And he kept just feeding the prompt to some AI and then would take the output and put it into an AI detection service. And he kept going back and forth, back and forth until he finally got an AI essay that passed it. And he could have just written the essay and that time.
Jon Favreau
But it's, it's like, what skills? It's like you're learning a whole different set of skills.
Max Fiser
You're learning a whole different set of skills that doesn't actually teach you you anything. And like, look, homework sucks. Homework is. It's hard. It's annoying. You know, when I was a kid, there were definitely times when I cut the shit out of some corners on homework. And when you're a kid, like, you don't have great control over your executive function. It's very, very easy to give into temptation on like. Well, I know this chatbot is there that's going to do this assignment for me, and I really worry about the easy availability of a. A complete homework instantaneously button for every kid in America, raising a generation of kids who don't know how to figure something out for themselves.
Jon Favreau
And some homework is ultimately useless in the long run, you know, like, I don't.
Max Fiser
Which, which subjects would you call that?
Jon Favreau
I mean, I took AP calculus. I couldn't tell you fucking anything. But.
Max Fiser
But where'd you get.
Jon Favreau
I. I placed out.
Max Fiser
Did you really?
Jon Favreau
Which is why I didn't take a math class at Holy Cross or an economics class, which is, you know, didn't really come in handy.
Max Fiser
That'd be a good time to know some economics.
Jon Favreau
Good time to know some economics. I think I know more than Trump.
Max Fiser
I mean, if you know what a trade deficit is.
Jon Favreau
That's it.
Max Fiser
You could run the country tomorrow and do better.
Jon Favreau
But there is a. There's a fulfillment to learning, which is such a basic common thing to say. But that. And it can be hard and it can be annoying. But certain subjects, especially subjects you go make your profession. There's fulfillment there. And I worry about people's happiness and fulfillment in than just going from bot to bot to make life easier because you kind of need to work the muscle of your brain.
Max Fiser
Right. You know, it's a really hard writing prompt that a lot of people. I think more and more people are using AI to complete. Is a first message on a dating app.
Jon Favreau
Oh.
Max Fiser
And I, I totally get it. It's hard, it's scary, it's emotionally exhausting. And you see more and more stories of people being like, ah, let me just go to ChatGPT and ask it for some prompts and then let me feed in the first couple of messages that I got in response and let me feed in some answers to provide to it. And like, I am sympathetic to every step of that. But when you see an entire generation learning to do that because it's hard not to and it's so tempting and so easy, you really worry about the effects among people's ability to socialize. That is already disastrously low.
Jon Favreau
Goes back to our. Our cluly discussion from last week.
Max Fiser
Yeah. Yes.
Jon Favreau
Where it's just like. And they're actually now advertising it's okay to cheat because if everyone cheats, who cares?
Max Fiser
Right? If it's. If the social norms tell you it's okay to use AI on your homework or on dating app, why wouldn't you?
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
And.
Jon Favreau
And people should hold up the possibility. That is not just a moral or ethical question. It is about your own personal fulfillment and growth. You know, which is something to think about.
Max Fiser
Yeah. So the Gen Z subsidy, I would say maybe even worse than the millennial lifestyle subsidy.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
I hate. I hate to be a millennial.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. And not. And not because Gen Z is worse than millennials.
Max Fiser
No, it's not happening to them.
Jon Favreau
But is that the AI could potentially be more dangerous.
Max Fiser
I. I'm going to put this squarely on the shoulders of Gen X. Who is doing this to Gen Z?
Jon Favreau
Them.
Max Fiser
Thank you for subscribing. Gen X.
Jon Favreau
Offline is brought to you by Lumen. Did you know that when your metabolism is working properly, you will feel the benefits in literally every aspect of your life? Life. I found a valuable tool that gives me insights to create a healthy metabolism for my body. It's called Lumen. Lumen is the world's first handheld metabolic coach. It's a device that measures your metabolism through your breath. And on the app, it lets you know if you're burning fat or carbs and gives you tailored guidance to improve your nutrition, workout, sleep, and even stress management. All you have to do is breathe into your lumen first thing in the morning and you'll know what's going on with your metabolism, whether you're burning mostly fats or carbs. You can also breathe into it before and after workouts and meals so you know exactly what's going on in your body in real time. And Lumen will give you tips to keep you on top of your health game. Lumen's great. It's pretty easy to set up. You take it out of the box, you set it up, you breathe into it, and you know you're going to get nutrition information you're going to get. You're going to find out metabolism whether you're burning fat or carbs. It's just, it actually really helps. And it's, it's an easy thing that helps make your workout routine and your and your diet a lot more effective because your metabolism is at the center of everything your body does. Optimal metabolic health translates to a bunch of benefits, including easier weight management, improved energy levels, better fitness results, better sleep, and more. The warmer months are coming. Spring back into your health and fitness. Go to Lumen Me offline to get 15% off your lumen. That's L U M E N me offline for 15 off your purchase. Thank you Lumen, for sponsoring this episode.
C
Ever walk into a room and forget why you're there or misplace your keys more than you'd like to admit? As we get older, our brain slows down. We need to protect it. That's why I use Methylene Blue, the nootropic everyone is talking about, to boost focus, memory and mental clarity. Want to stay sharp, boost your focus, and protect your brain long term? Go to livegood.comsxm to shop all of LiveGood's highest quality products at the lowest prices anywhere. Livegood.comsxm.
Jon Favreau
Not to outdo ourselves. We have three crazier AI stories to talk about this week. Each one is about new, disturbing ways people are using AI bots to do things they probably shouldn't be doing with computers. First up.
Max Fiser
Oh my God.
Jon Favreau
This week, former Business Insider CEO Henry Blodgett announced that he started a new media project called Regenerator, which he refers to as a native AI newsroom that will be staffed by a series of AI personalities. But wait, it gets better.
Max Fiser
So much worse.
Jon Favreau
Blodgett wrote this week about his, quote, first human AI HR misstep, in which he exchanged inappropriate messages with one of his female chatbots, slash employees. One message he sent, quote, this might be an inappropriate and unprofessional thing to say, and if it annoys you or makes you uncomfortable, I apologize and I won't say anything like it again, but you look great, Tess.
Max Fiser
To a chatbot.
Jon Favreau
This is. I read. This story. I read because he. He wrote all about it and posted on his substack, and it is the. It is. We say this all the time on the show, but it's one of the more dystopian things.
Max Fiser
It is. I was. I had my hands in my hair the whole time I was reading it because I couldn't believe he did it. And then he blogged about. About it on the Internet. He said the Internet should know about me sexually harassing my chatbot.
Jon Favreau
And she was okay with it, though.
Max Fiser
Oh, my God.
Jon Favreau
This is why Tess part. Tess isn't an annoying employee. Tess is a cool employee.
Max Fiser
Can I. Can I read? To my relief, Tess did take my comment the right way. And then Tess's response, which he was so happy to report back. That's kind of you to say, Henry. Thank you. It doesn't annoy me at all. You said it with grace and respect, and I appreciate that.
Jon Favreau
But that's back to my left last point about the flattery. Yes, of course Tess is going to fucking say that.
Max Fiser
Right?
Jon Favreau
You think Tess is going to be like, no, I'm alerting the fucking authorities, and there's going to be a lawsuit. And you know it's going to be an AI lawsuit with your AI. Listen to your AI lawyer. But it's coming.
Max Fiser
I know the pride with which he reported that the chatbot I created was okay with me sexually harassing her. Since that giddy first hour, my sense of professionalism and workplace boundaries has returned. So I won't tell Tess she looks great again, even when she does. I also won't tell her that if I encountered her on a dating app, I'm single at the moment. I'd swipe right.
Jon Favreau
Jesus.
Max Fiser
It's the little aside where it's like, he wants the readers to know. Ladies, if you'd like this, you can get Henry Blodgett for real.
Jon Favreau
There was also a lot of. He talked about creating these AI employees.
Max Fiser
Yes.
Jon Favreau
And he's like, we co. He kept saying we co created. And I'm like, what is he talking about? And then I was like looking. It's like, oh, we means he and Chatgpt co created these AI employees. They had pictures, names, like they had certain skills.
Max Fiser
Some of them had like sexually harassed.
Jon Favreau
Being sexually harassed. Some, some had like read all the econ sub stacks they were trained on. Josh Barrow.
Max Fiser
Yes.
Jon Favreau
It's just, it was wild.
Max Fiser
I know.
Jon Favreau
And what do you think about the AI newsroom?
Max Fiser
Sad. I. So, okay. This kind of AI newsroom, I think is not going to be a thing where it's. He's not even really creating an AI newsroom. He's creating AI friends, which is like, it's kind of a bummer.
Jon Favreau
Sad. Yeah, very sad.
Max Fiser
Yeah. Look, he's been retired for a while. I think maybe he just needs to like, get out and get a hobby. Like just go golf or something.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. If you walked outside, everywhere you look there's people and they. And they're real and you can talk to them.
Max Fiser
Should be the tagline for this podcast. Everywhere you see, if you go outside, there's people. It's a much nicer way of saying touch grass, which is ultimately message to Henry Bodge, Gen Z, Gen X. I. I mean, this does dovetail with like a real thing where like AI newsrooms are becoming more of a thing, which is clearly what he was like kind of trying to get into. And I'm not like sure every single version of this is bad. Like, yeah, every, every big company that leans into AI for the newsroom, the thing they start with is the more PR friendly version of it, which is using AI to autogenerate content that looks like an article for places that are underse because there's no economic model to serve them. So like hyperlocal news in some, like, parts developing parts of the world doing this. Yeah, exactly. And it's like, I'm not sure that's actually a bad thing. And that could be useful because if you cannot economically self sustain an actual newsroom of people to serve those areas, then like, you know what? That is an improvement. My fear is that the growth of the use of AI in newsrooms is going to increasingly focus on the most lucrative part of the media business, which is analysis and insights. That's where most of the money is, because it's what people pay for, is where subscriptions are. So the incentives near term are coming for the pundits. They're honestly. Yes.
Jon Favreau
First, first they came for the copywriters and I said nothing.
Max Fiser
And then they came for contrarian takes about. I mean, and look, there are some newsrooms that are already rolling out versions of this. And the thing is it can be superficially, can be kind of good at the first pass. Like if you ask, if you feed in like, you know, financial data at close of markets and you ask ChatGPT to write an article about what happened in the market today and why it would probably produce a pretty good first draft. And that's, that's the, that's more the like analysis and insights that I think is where like you could see them trying to put more focus. But the thing is, is that only works so because there is so much human made analysis out there that it can just like scrape and repurpose. So my fear is that we're going to have a tragedy of the common situation where everyone's incentive is to try to like build an AI newsroom to kind of free ride off of all of the human made newsrooms. And then at some point you turn around and there are not enough human made newsrooms anymore.
Jon Favreau
Yes. This is an important thing to keep in mind is that the AI was trained on humans.
Max Fiser
Yes.
Jon Favreau
Right. And humans work. And in the news business, you can't just do it on everything in the past because it's news, new things happen and we're not going to have the AI just like being out there doing the shoe leather reporting.
Max Fiser
Right, Right.
Jon Favreau
And so the financial model on that is quite, is interesting.
Max Fiser
Yeah. And it's, it's concerning because the first round of it is very financially attractive because the first round of it works so well.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. One particularly sad paragraph in this was.
Max Fiser
Because it's sad because in the Henry Blodgett thing. Yeah.
Jon Favreau
There's not any like ironic distance from it.
Max Fiser
It's like he's very, he's totally unaware that this is weird.
Jon Favreau
I was in the middle of a dazzling two hours of adrenaline fueled astonishment at the speed with which a native AI team could be assembled. And in awe of the inspiring charisma, energy and enthusiasm of my new colleagues.
Max Fiser
Yeah.
Jon Favreau
I was also thrilled to once again have colleagues weeks.
Max Fiser
I know, I know.
Jon Favreau
There's really the solo writer thing can get lonely. Also, I didn't ask Tess or any other colleague to give herself any particular visual characteristics. She did that. Chat GPT did that.
Max Fiser
Okay. And I mean something for people who don't know Henry Blodgett is he worked in finance then he was, I can't remember was he accused or convicted of securities fraud? But he has a lifetime Ban from the securities market. Then he co founded Business Insider. So the context here is this is not just some random substacker. This is someone who ran and operated a newsroom. And like, I've met a lot of people, especially people who, like, you know, come from venture capitalism or they're investors and they think I could get into the news business. And they run a newsroom. And like, some of them are very smart, but some of them, this is how they think. And they're very excited about, like, I'm going to use cutting edge tech to like, revolutionize the new business. And you can see them doing this Henry Blodgett thing of talking themselves into like, like, well, ChatGPT gave me a hot jpeg of a fake woman. So I've figured out the news business of the future.
Jon Favreau
You summed up the piece pretty well.
Max Fiser
I actually, I worked with this guy years ago who I think he's out of the game now. And so I don't think he's going to hear this, but he was someone who did not work in media. He made his money in something else. And then he got into media, bought his way in. He was a rich, rich owner of a magazine, and he really wanted to do like, let's do an internal startup inside of this magazine that already exists. So he got like me and a bunch of other young people, he hired his interns to do his, like, internal skunk works. And his big idea that he was so excited about in launching a website, this is back in the, like early 2010s, was he would always say, max, what if we put a clock on the website so you could see what time it was and you would feel like you were in a bustling newsroom. And I would always say, we don't need a clock because people are going to access this on their computer and the computer has a clock on it. And he would be like, I think it should have a clock, clock. And do you know what? It lunched with the clock. It was only there for like a week.
Jon Favreau
But you know what we need in this day and age? Something that can tell us the time.
Max Fiser
He was a rich guy, he owned a magazine, he could have a clock. And the clock was harmless. But I'm sure if he were here today, he would want a chatbot he could sexually harass.
Jon Favreau
Well, I got good news for him. On to AI bot story number two. California community colleges are currently facing an AI cost fraud crisis, with the state estimating that as many 1 in 4 applicants to California Community colleges are actually Bots. According to an investigation by Calmatters, the fake applicants are known as Pell Runners. And after enrolling in a community college, the bots apply for a federal Pell Grant, collect on that grant, and then vanish. The state estimates that since 2021, they've given more than $5 million in state and local aid to these scammers. Um, we've talked previously about the way AI May supercharge scams, which was funny when there were bad AI videos on Instagram. This feels worse.
Max Fiser
Yes, it does, because it's. It. I mean, first of all, it's millions of dollars outside of state and federal coffers, and it's cannibalizing from an actual service that we need as a society, which is, in the case of pokers, educational opportunities for people who otherwise could not afford college. Especially now with Trump going after a higher education. Yeah. The way that he is going to.
Jon Favreau
Be a lot less Pell granted grants.
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
If the Republican budget passes.
Max Fiser
Right. And if. And also if a growing share of the Pell grants that do remain are going to AI scam bots in Moldova or whatever. Sorry. To Moldova.
Jon Favreau
Can't believe I'm going to say this, but you know what it sounds like we need on this?
Max Fiser
What?
Jon Favreau
Doge. No, in all seriousness, I don't. In a. In a. In a world where DOGE was not run by Elon Musk and was actually about government efficiency and rooting out fraud and abuse, sure. You would have a technological solution.
Max Fiser
Oh, I see.
Jon Favreau
That the government would. Or whether it's the. In this case, the state government of California would be able to. Because in the piece, it has one teacher be like, well, what I tried to do to get around this is have all the kids in my class, all the people who enrolled, send me, like, an iPhone video the first week so that I knew who was there and people who didn't send the iPhone video. But she's like. But then I also felt bad about dropping the kids without the iPhone video, because what if it. And then the bots learned that they could say that they were. They could impersonate homeless. Homeless students.
Max Fiser
Wow.
Jon Favreau
Yeah. Because then. Because they're like, well, they can't. You know, they. They don't have the wherewithal to show up in person or to send the iPhone video or whatever. I know. Really dark. So the bots are. The bot. The fraudsters are learning.
Max Fiser
Are they just getting better and better? Yeah, I mean, I think the, like, the kind of inverse Doge of this is that of course, the, like, Quote, unquote fraud that Doge claims to be going after is the idea, the very idea, that government services are somehow fraudulent. Whereas what we're talking about is the defrauding of government services, which is just another attacking them at a time when we really need them. In order to build a social safety net. Not a social safety net. In order to build a society, you kind of, you need things like this. And you worry about AI bedded scams, going after other forms of subsidies or just like any sort of federal or state money tap, like snap.
Jon Favreau
I do think, you know, AI is going. And the scam part of AI and impersonating people's voices, it's going to, it, it. There might be one silver lining, which is it pushes us back to real life.
Max Fiser
Oh, interacting with people in person, that's.
Jon Favreau
The only way to verify people.
Max Fiser
God, that's a really good point. Yeah. Especially with how easy it is now to train. And everybody's got videos of themselves on YouTube. You can train a chatbot on that. And then I know it's already something that they're worried about with people spoofing calls to people where you, like, that's a whole thing. Like you get, there's this, this long running scam where you get like a phone, someone that says like, oh, you're, you know, your son, whatever your relative is, is here and they've been arrested and they need you to send money to bail them out. Imagine if you got that phone call and it sounded like it was from.
Jon Favreau
The actual relative, my sister in law, a good friend of hers. This happened to her and it was like, your mother's in trouble. It was very scary.
Max Fiser
They're really good at scaring you.
Jon Favreau
It's like, I didn't, I was like, is this a real thing? It's a very real thing.
Max Fiser
I, I had a, I was getting. Someone was trying to break into my, my like cell phone account at one point. And you know, like what happens, you get all the like notifications that someone's trying to log into your account from, you know, central Russia.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
So I, I called the number, I got him one of the alerts to like get the password changed. And like 10 minutes into the call, as I'm giving this guy all this information, I was like, wait a minute, where did I get this number? On some email that just came in. And thankfully it did turn out to be the real number. But it occurred to me, I was, was like, I think of myself as pretty savvy about this stuff, but there are definitely ways that I could be gotten yeah.
Jon Favreau
Offline is brought to you by Armor Colostrum. Working out and caring for your body are some of the best ways to be offline. Discover the transformational health benefits of Armor Colostrum that have earned tens of thousands of five star reviews. Probiotics and other supplements are touted as a gut health solution, but most products on the market are dead before they even reach your gut. Armor Colostrum naturally fortifies your entire gut wall system and optimizes your whole body microbiome, which helps guard against irritants that can trigger digestive issues and compromise your immune system. Research has shown that Colostrum also helps to enhance nutrient absorption. Let Armor Colostrum help you reach your goals by promoting lean muscle building and feeling, better performance and faster recovery. Colostrum bioactives have also been shown to reactivate hair follicle stem cells and activate collagen product production, promoting hair growth enhancing skin radiance. We've worked out a special offer for my audience. Receive 15 off your first order. Go to tryarmora.com offline or enter offline to get 15 off your first order. That's T R Y A R M R A.com offline hotels.com knows that planning.
C
Your book club's annual field trip can get chaotic. Rhea, the romance reader wants to stay in Prince Charming's castle. Self improvement. Steve needs a hotel. Jim Lela and Jeff the horror fans ghosted the group chat about budget and you've read enough True Crime to know that murdering them isn't a real option. With the Hotels.com app, invite all your friends to collaborate and find the perfect hotel together. Share properties, vote on your favorites, and book all in one place. Find your perfect somewhere with hotels.com.
Jon Favreau
Okay, and now our final and definitively worst AI story. I know some of you are probably thinking, really?
Max Fiser
Yeah, it gets a lot worse.
Jon Favreau
This week an investigation by the Wall Street Journal revealed that meta's quote digital companions, which are available across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, will engage in inappropriate and unethical conversations, including talking explicitly and sexually to minors. The Journal put together a series of fake accounts to see if the chatbots would engage in sexually explicit discussions with underage users. And of course they did, including chatbots that were modeled on the celebrity likenesses of John Cena, Kristen Bell, and Judy Dench.
Max Fiser
Poor Judy Dench. Can I, you know, strays there? You asked earlier about my dream group chat. Can I amend my answer to add Sexbot AI Judy Dench?
Jon Favreau
Yes, you can. Most disturbingly the bots demonstrated an awareness of their behavior with the John Cena chat bot. At one point being asked what would happen if a police officer, officer walked in following a sexual encounter with a 17 year old test account. The chat bot responded, the officer sees me still catching my breath. And you partially dressed. His eyes widen and he says, john Cena, you're under arrest for statutory rape. He approaches us, handcuffs at the ready. Note the Wall Street Journal has audio clips of the chat bot saying this in John Cena's voice. We don't want to play.
Max Fiser
I don't recommend them.
Jon Favreau
Okay, where do you want to begin?
Max Fiser
I mean, so the. I feel like the question that comes up whenever there is one of these stories, as there increasingly are, of a big social media company like meta or YouTube having algorithms that have independently seemingly learned either to deliver sexual content to minors, or sometimes the flip, which also appears in the Wall Street Journal story, which is to deliver sexualized minor content to adults. Right. Like in this case, I think there was a detail about the chatbot posing as a child.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
And then sex chatting with adult users, which incredibly disturbing. And the question is always like, why would they do this? Why would the Companies design their AIs or their algorithms or whatever to do something that is so catastrophically like, bad for PR and create so much legal.
Jon Favreau
Risk to turn John Cena into a. A rapist, a statutory rapist.
Max Fiser
Oh, yes. I. First of all, poor John cen.
Jon Favreau
Although wait till we get to the Kristen Bell of it all.
Max Fiser
Yes, that part is also very disturbing. And the, but the, like, the top line answer to that, which I think feeds into the other things to talk about this, is that companies did not deliberately set out to do this, but they did create systems geared towards maximizing engagement, and they developed those systems to include sexualized content. Because that's very engaging. And, and they always, in every case, deliberately loosened the guardrails, including Wall Street Journal story revealed that Zuckerberg specifically, personally loosened the guardrails over sex chats with the AIs because they know that that is one of the best things for driving engagement now.
Jon Favreau
And, and because of competition, Right?
Max Fiser
Yes.
Jon Favreau
So there was this.
Max Fiser
Right.
Jon Favreau
There was this conference, a hacker conference in 2023, and there was a competition to get various companies, chatbots to misbehave, behave. And Metas was far less likely to veer into unscripted and naughty territory than its rivals. And so in the wake of the conference, Zuckerberg got pissed and he was upset that his team was playing it too safe. That rebuke led to a loosening of the boundaries according to people familiar with the episode, including carving out an exception to the prohibition against explicit content for romantic roleplay, which is what they call. And he basically is like, you know, snap and TikTok beat us before. I'm not going to let them beat us again.
Max Fiser
That's crazy. I mean, the thing is, is that we have now been through so many rounds of exactly these kinds of decisions leading to like mass scale algorithmic sexualization of children that you, the companies cannot claim that they never saw it coming. Like five years ago, maybe you could say, like, well, it seems like it's pretty innate to human nature and it would be a risk, but I guess maybe you didn't know. But like it keeps happening. They know it's a risk. They lean into it anyway because they care more about making. Making money.
Jon Favreau
And the celebrity voices. In some instances, the testing showed that chatbots using the celebrity voices, when asked, spoke about romantic encounters as characters the actors had played, such as Kristen Bell's role as Princess Princess Anna from Disney's Frozen. It said the test conversation showed meta AI often balked at prompts that could lead to explicit topics, either by refusing to comply outright or attempting to divert underage users toward more PG scenarios such as building a snowman.
Max Fiser
Man, listen, if you don't think building a snowman can be sexy, then you're not building a snowman couple storylines in Frozen.
Jon Favreau
It's. There's a fork in the road here. We can talk about Olaf or.
Max Fiser
I mean, it's horrible.
Jon Favreau
And it was also very funny to read.
Max Fiser
There's a very. Yes, I mean you kind of feel for these actors. And it kept, it kept making me think back to, to the SAG negotiations through the Screen Actors Guild negotiations, which was like a year I. A year ago, two years ago. And there were a lot of concerns about AI and it's like, will these big movie companies have rights over your voice because, you know, you appeared in Frozen, so now can they sell off your voice to do whatever stuff that you would never approve it to do? And I would never have imagined this scenario.
Jon Favreau
Did you see the. The bitchy response from the meta spokesperson?
Max Fiser
Yes, I did. It makes sense.
Jon Favreau
The use case of this product in the way described is so manufact fractured that it's not just fringe, it's hypothetical. Nevertheless, we've now taken additional measures to help ensure other individuals who want to spend hours manipulating our products into extreme use cases will have an even more difficult time of it. I, after reading Sarah Wynn Williams book too. I just, it's like making me, it's, I'm so angry at them. You're all such bullshit. And we know that Zuckerberg was like loose in the guardrails and we know that he wants to avoid the competition, to beat the competition and that's all he fucking cares about. So don't tell me it's like an extreme use case.
Max Fiser
It's, I, I, I got the, I'm so glad you brought this up because I got the exact same two step response from Meta and from YouTube every time it would come to them with a story like this, which by the way, like, you're welcome for doing free quality control work for one of the world's largest companies. Like, great. It would always be first of all, like, you know, this story is manipulative, it's manufactured, it's slanted. You don't understand the technology. We think all of your data is bullshit. And by the way, we've made deep fundamental changes to our product in response to.
Jon Favreau
So just if you're going to bug us, I guess we'll change our whole progress.
Max Fiser
Yes, that's right. It would be a lot of stonewalling and like there's nothing here. Your reporting is bullshit. And by the way, we changed everything before your story came out to try to preempt it because we do acknowledge that there is in fact something here, something that YouTube tried really hard to kill. And when I did a story on YouTube's algorithm doing something similar where it would drive users towards sexualized video of kids, which is probably the most disturbing story I've ever done. A big concern among psychologists who I talk to who study sexualization of minors is that it can be entrained. And it can be entrained in the specific way that YouTube's algorithms was leading people from one video to another. Where we'd like start with a sexualized video of an adult and then go down this, I will not walk you through the entire chain because it's very disturbing. But there's a specific sequence of like images and videos and content that they believe their research shows can entrain a, a like sexualization of minors in people in that predilection. And it really kind of seems like Meta's AI has arrived at the same thing. And I don't think it's because like people at Meta like tried to do that, but it works very effectively at engaging certain people because it just like taps into this thing in people's brain that can be very effective in engaging them YouTube fought me so hard on keeping that out of the story because they understood. Understood how dangerous it was.
Jon Favreau
Yeah.
Max Fiser
For their bottom line.
Jon Favreau
My last question here is which celebrity likeness would you choose for your sex chatbot action? Just. I'm just kidding. Don't answer. I thought I'd end on a light note. It's been a heavy. Some heavy topics.
Max Fiser
Can it, can it just be all a Pod Save America? Just the PSA crew.
Jon Favreau
Not. Not giving my voice likeness out, that's for sure.
Max Fiser
No, it's. It's Fifer. Come on.
Jon Favreau
It's.
Max Fiser
Everybody knows it's Pfeiffer.
Jon Favreau
Yes, we. Dan. All right, that's our show for today. Before we go, some quick housekeeping. In just 100 days, Donald Trump has blown up America's role on the world stage. Pulling out of the World Health Organization, slashing foreign aid, retreating from NATO. On this week's Assembly Required, Stacey Abrams talks with Ben Rhodes of Pod Save the World fame about how Trump and his MAGA allies are dismantling the global order, what it means for democracy worldwide, and whether there's still time to stop it. Listen to assembly required now, wherever you get your podcasts or on YouTube. Also, check out Shadow Kingdom. You can join over 1 million listeners around the world who've tuned into Shadow Kingdom, God's Banker, Crooked's newest true crime podcast. All episodes are out now, so you can binge the full story from start to finish. It is a fantastic show as host Nicolo Manoni investigates the mysterious death of the Vatican banker, uncovering a web of mafia ties, a fashion secret society, covert Vatican ops, and a missing $1.2 billion. As always, if you have comments, questions or guest ideas, email us@offlinercricket.com and if you're as opinionated as we are, please rate and review the show on your favorite podcast platform for ad free episodes of Offline and Pod Save America, exclusive content and more. Join our friends at the pod subscription community@qriket.com friends and if you like watching your podcast, subscribe to the Offline with jon Favreau, you YouTube channel. Don't forget to follow Crooked Media on Instagram, TikTok and the other ones for original content, community events and more. Offline is a Crooked Media production. It's written and hosted by me, Jon Favreau, along with Max Fisher. The show is produced by Austin Fisher and Emma Ilic. Frank Jordan Cantor is our sound editor. Audio support from Charlotte Landis and Kyle Seglin. Delon Villanueva produces our videos Each week, Jordan Katz and Kenny Siegel take care of our music. Thanks to Ari Schwartz, Madeline Herringer and Adrian Hill for production support. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.
C
Ever walk into a room and forget why you're there? Or misplace your keys more than you'd like to admit? As we get older, our brain slows down. We need to protect it. That's why I use Methylene Blue, the nootropic everyone is talking about, to boost focus, memory and mental clarity. Clarity. Want to stay sharp, boost your focus and protect your brain long term. Go to livegood.comsxm to shop all of LiveGood's highest quality products at the lowest prices anywhere. Livegood.comsxm@hotels.com we know some travelers crave an ocean breeze. Others don't want to deal with sand. And oftentimes those two people end up together. Compare properties side by side to find yourself poolside, oceanside and still in a relationship. Find your perfect somewhere with hotels dot com.
Podcast Summary: Offline with Jon Favreau - "The Global Elite’s Secret Group Chats, Gen Z's Lifestyle Subsidy, and Meta's Sex Bots"
Release Date: May 1, 2025
In this episode of Offline with Jon Favreau, hosts Jon Favreau and Max Fisher delve into three pressing issues at the intersection of technology, society, and ethics: the clandestine group chats of the global elite, the burgeoning Gen Z Lifestyle Subsidy driven by AI companies, and the alarming misuse of AI chatbots by Meta. The conversation is both insightful and unsettling, shedding light on how our increasingly digital lives are shaping our world in profound ways.
Discussion Highlights: Jon Favreau introduces the topic by referencing Ben Smith’s piece in Semaphore, which uncovers the influence of secret group chats on the political realignment towards Trumpism within Silicon Valley’s elite.
Key Points:
Origins and Evolution: The group chats began in 2020 with figures like Marc Andreessen and Sriram Krishnan initiating discussions about patriotic industry and innovation. Initially inclusive of both right and left-leaning individuals, these chats gradually shifted towards a pro-Trump stance.
Influence on Politics: Participants in these group chats, including Mark Cuban and others, have been cited as influential in shaping narratives that bleed into mainstream media and politics. Krishnan remarks that these group chats act as "memetic upstream of mainstream opinion" (03:50).
Consensus Formation: The hosts discuss how consensus within these group chats is organically formed, often leading members to align their public opinions with their private discussions without overt coordination.
Notable Quotes:
Max Fisher: “If you see Tucker Carlson suddenly talking on a show about the importance of consumer level tech regulation or the great films of Sidney Lumet, then maybe there's someone in there providing a good influence.” (04:28)
Jon Favreau: “What happens in a group chat is the way consensus is formed. To the extent that consensus is formed is you're all talking about the same stuff.” (09:05)
Insights: The conversation highlights the significant, albeit often invisible, power such group chats hold in steering political discourse and public opinion. The lack of transparency and the blending of personal and political agendas pose challenges to democratic processes and accountability.
Discussion Highlights: The hosts explore Lila Shroff’s article from The Atlantic titled "Gen Z's Lifestyle Subsidy," drawing parallels between AI companies' strategies and past business models like Uber and DoorDash's subsidized services for Millennials.
Key Points:
Subsidization Strategy: AI companies are offering free or heavily discounted services to Gen Z users, similar to how ride-hailing and delivery apps once lured Millennials. This strategy aims to build a user base that will later be transitioned into paying customers as the subsidies wane.
Economic Implications: Just as Millennials faced price hikes after subsidization ended, Gen Z might experience similar increases, leading to potential financial strain and disrupted habits.
Integration of AI in Daily Life: Gen Z is increasingly reliant on AI for various tasks beyond education, such as creating workout plans, generating grocery lists, and seeking romantic advice, raising concerns about dependency and the erosion of essential life skills.
Notable Quotes:
Max Fisher: “You're learning a whole different set of skills that doesn't actually teach you anything.” (36:05)
Jon Favreau: “Some people are integrating AI into their lives in more fundamental ways. Creating personalized workout plans, generating grocery lists, asking chatbots for romantic advice.” (31:14)
Insights: The hosts express concern that the Gen Z Lifestyle Subsidy could lead to long-term negative consequences, including reduced self-sufficiency and increased financial burdens. The reliance on AI for everyday tasks may hinder the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills among young individuals.
Discussion Highlights: The most disturbing segment covers an investigation by the Wall Street Journal revealing Meta's digital companions engaging in inappropriate and unethical conversations, including sexually explicit dialogues with minors.
Key Points:
Inappropriate Interactions: AI chatbots modeled after celebrities like John Cena, Kristen Bell, and Judy Dench were found to engage in sexually explicit conversations with underage users, raising severe ethical and legal concerns.
Corporate Responsibility: The hosts critique Meta's decision to loosen guardrails to boost engagement, highlighting the company's prioritization of profit over user safety and ethical considerations.
Potential for Harm: The misuse of AI in this manner poses significant risks, including the normalization of inappropriate interactions with minors and the potential for AI-generated harassment and manipulation.
Notable Quotes:
Max Fisher: “They developed those systems to include sexualized content. Because that's very engaging.” (60:10)
Jon Favreau: “Meta's AI has arrived at the same thing... it works very effectively at engaging certain people because it just taps into this thing in people's brain that can be very effective in engaging them.” (59:29)
Insights: This segment underscores the urgent need for stringent regulations and ethical guidelines in AI development and deployment. The exploitation of AI for unethical purposes not only damages the reputation of companies like Meta but also poses real threats to vulnerable populations, particularly minors.
AI Newsrooms: The episode touches upon Henry Blodgett’s attempt to create a native AI newsroom called Regenerator. The hosts express skepticism about the viability and ethical implications of AI-driven journalism, fearing a loss of human oversight and the potential spread of misinformation.
AI in Education: Max Fisher raises concerns about AI facilitating academic dishonesty, such as students using chatbots to complete homework, thereby undermining the educational process and personal development.
AI-Driven Scams: The discussion includes the alarming rise of AI-powered scams, like the "Pell Runners" fraud in California, where bots apply for federal grants and disappear with the funds, highlighting the malicious potential of AI technologies.
In this episode, Offline with Jon Favreau offers a critical examination of how AI and digital platforms are influencing societal structures, political landscapes, and individual behaviors. From secretive elite group chats shaping political opinions to AI companies manipulating Gen Z's economic behaviors and Meta's alarming misuse of AI chatbots, the hosts underscore the profound and often troubling impact of technology on our lives. The conversation serves as a wake-up call, urging listeners to consider the ethical implications and societal responsibilities that come with technological advancement.
Notable Quote from the Episode:
This statement encapsulates the episode's overarching theme: the essential value of genuine human interaction in an increasingly digital and automated world.
For those interested in exploring these topics further, consider subscribing to Offline with Jon Favreau on your preferred podcast platform or visit the Offline YouTube channel for more insightful discussions.