Podcast Summary: "How Neoconservatism Led the US to Invade Iraq"
On the Media by WNYC Studios
Release Date: March 22, 2023
Hosts: Brooke Gladstone and Micah Loewinger
Episode Focus: Examining the influence of neoconservatism on the United States' decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
1. Introduction and Context
The episode commemorates the 20th anniversary of President George W. Bush's announcement to invade Iraq, marking a pivotal moment that has had lasting repercussions on both American politics and Middle Eastern geopolitics.
Michael Olinger opens the discussion by reflecting on the long-term impacts of the Iraq invasion:
“It was 20 years ago this week that President George W. Bush announced the beginning of the war in Iraq, setting an invasion and occupation that cast a long, grim shadow.”
[00:50]
2. Defining Neoconservatism
Neoconservatism is presented as a distinct ideological movement originating from the Cold War era. Unlike general hawkish conservatism, it encompasses a specific mission to spread democracy worldwide, viewing anti-American governments as existential threats to global order.
John Bolton elaborates on the ideology:
“...it is this very specific ideological movement that comes out of the Cold War that says that it is America's mission in the world to bring democracy to all people...”
[03:11]
He further explains that neoconservatism is driven by both arrogance in American exceptionalism and fear stemming from Cold War anxieties about unfriendly governments destabilizing the world.
“It’s both... the belief that there is something totally different about the United States... It also comes from this Cold War fear that if unfriendly governments are allowed to exist, that the entire world will turn against us...”
[04:05]
3. Key Players and Influencers
The episode identifies pivotal figures who championed neoconservative ideals, including Republican defense officials from the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations such as Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz. Additionally, academia-based leaders in Washington, D.C., and New York played significant roles in shaping and promoting the ideology.
Bolton highlights the political maneuvering during the late 1990s:
“...Newt Gingrich is really desperate for some way to show that the GOP is still the party of ideas.”
[05:33]
He discusses how the Republican Party leveraged neoconservative ideology to position themselves against President Bill Clinton, especially during the Lewinsky scandal era.
4. The Path to War: Policy and Ideology
The transition from policy to the actual invasion of Iraq is dissected, emphasizing how neoconservatives influenced key legislative actions like the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, which signaled a shift towards seeking regime change in Iraq.
Bolton describes the act as the culmination of years of neoconservative advocacy:
“...this was the culmination of something they had fought for for years.”
[06:56]
He connects this policy shift to the eventual administration of George W. Bush, which brought in prominent neoconservatives such as Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney.
5. The Aftermath and Lessons Unlearned
Post-9/11 dynamics are explored, illustrating how neoconservatism provided a framework that justified the invasion by linking Saddam Hussein to terrorism, despite the lack of substantial evidence.
Bolton critiques the administration's approach to intelligence:
“...they find these crazy sources, these Iraqi exiles in Egypt who tell them what they want to believe...”
[09:06]
He argues that the Bush administration genuinely believed in the ideological tenets of neoconservatism, viewing the war as a moral imperative rather than a pursuit driven by flawed intelligence alone.
6. Contemporary Reflections and Continuations
The discussion moves to the present, questioning why there hasn't been a significant reckoning with the consequences of the Iraq War and the persistence of neoconservative ideology. Bolton suggests that political incentives prevent a thorough examination or "cleaning house" within the Republican Party.
“...there's really not incentive for a kind of Republican cleaning house because you wouldn't have anybody left.”
[12:10]
He also draws parallels between past and current foreign policies, indicating that the same ideological underpinnings influence U.S. actions in regions like the Middle East today.
7. Conclusion
The episode concludes by emphasizing the cyclical nature of ideological-driven foreign policies and the importance of learning from past mistakes to prevent future conflicts.
Les Gelb, reflecting on historical lessons, states:
“We never learned that darn lesson about believing our way into these wars. We went into Afghanistan and we went into Iraq.”
[13:57]
John Bolton warns of the ongoing risks of ideological extremism in foreign policy:
“...American foreign policy has always been so ideological. ...we keep making the same mistakes. And you know, we're gonna make it again.”
[14:35]
Notable Quotes
-
John Bolton:
“It’s really ideology...Neoconservatism presents a fully formed, complete, footnoted ideology and worldview for understanding the September 11 attacks.”
[07:33] -
Max Fisher:
“...how actively they tried to find the evidence of weapons of mass destruction once they got into Iraq...”
[08:44] -
Les Gelb:
“It also shows that the foreign policy community believed that if we lost Vietnam, the rest of Asia would fall.”
[13:26]
Key Takeaways
- Neoconservatism significantly influenced the U.S. decision to invade Iraq, driven by a belief in spreading democracy and fear of unfriendly governments.
- Political Strategy: Neoconservative ideas were leveraged by the Republican Party to gain political advantage during vulnerable periods in Democratic administrations.
- Intelligence and Ideology: The administration's reliance on selective intelligence sources underscored the deep ideological commitment to neoconservative principles.
- Lack of Accountability: There has been minimal political incentive to critically reassess the war's consequences or the ideological motivations behind it.
- Recurring Patterns: The persistence of ideological-driven foreign policy suggests a potential for repeating past mistakes in future conflicts.
This episode of On the Media provides a comprehensive examination of how neoconservative ideology shaped one of the most consequential military actions in recent U.S. history, urging listeners to consider the enduring impact of these political philosophies.