No. The Medieval Times Were Not All Game of Thrones

Summary

Podcast Summary: On the Media – "No. The Medieval Times Were Not All Game of Thrones"

Release Date: September 21, 2022

Introduction

In the episode titled "No. The Medieval Times Were Not All Game of Thrones," On the Media host Brooke Gladstone engages in a compelling conversation with historians Matthew Gabriel and David M. Perry. The discussion centers around their book, The Bright: A New History of Medieval Europe, challenging the pervasive myths surrounding the medieval period. Gladstone and her guests delve into how modern perceptions, often influenced by popular media like Game of Thrones, distort the true nature of the Middle Ages.

Challenging the Myth of the Dark Ages

Brooke Gladstone opens the conversation by highlighting the commonly held view of the medieval era as a bleak, barbaric period dominated by violence and oppression. She remarks:

“We know it is a brutal time dominated by white men with mighty steeds and flashing swords or drenched in blood by marauding Vikings...” (00:53)

Matthew Gabriel and David M. Perry counter this narrative by dissecting the origins and perpetuation of the "Dark Ages" myth. Perry explains how labeling contemporary issues as "medieval" serves to distance and oversimplify modern complexities:

“It suggests that this 1000 year period... was more violent or more barbaric than something else... It seems to me it's harder for us to understand what's really going on and address the problems now.” (03:47)

Gabriel adds that this approach allows society to portray itself as superior, conveniently categorizing problems as relics of the past rather than addressing their root causes:

“You're trying to give a very simplistic explanation and say, you know, this is an aberration, so we don't actually have to pay attention to why it's happening.” (03:57)

Modern Misconceptions and Media Influence

The discussion shifts to how modern media, particularly fantasy genres like Game of Thrones, perpetuate a skewed image of the medieval period. Gladstone notes the dual portrayal of the Middle Ages as both dark and glorified:

“You think about the world today. That can be a good thing or a bad thing... because they associate themselves not with the people who are being persecuted, but the persecutors.” (05:21)

Perry emphasizes that medieval imagery is often co-opted by groups like white supremacists to valorize a distorted past:

“Whenever you find white supremacists, you'll find medievalism and you'll almost always find murder.” (05:35)

Medieval Democracy and Social Complexity

Contrary to popular belief, Gabriel and Perry reveal that the medieval period was not devoid of democratic elements. They highlight examples of democratic practices in medieval Italian cities, where citizens voted for mayors and aldermen:

“Medieval people love to vote... Italian cities voted for mayors, they voted for aldermen.” (12:42)

Perry further illustrates that contemporary democratic practices have deep roots in medieval institutions, challenging the notion that democracy is a purely modern invention:

“There are medieval governments that were democratic.” (12:42)

The Bright Ages: A New Perspective

The hosts and guests advocate for a nuanced understanding of the medieval period, termed as the "Bright Ages." They argue that medieval Europe was a time of vibrant culture, innovation, and democratic governance, rather than the monochromatic gloom often depicted:

“They lived in color. They did not live in a black and white world.” (11:07)

Perry shares anecdotes from their book, such as a Byzantine general's pivotal decision that could have extended the Roman Empire, illustrating the contingent nature of historical events:

“One I like to talk about... he could have taken it, and then we'd have an entirely different story to tell.” (10:30)

Impact of Misunderstanding History

Gladstone and her guests stress the importance of accurately understanding history to avoid fatalism and recognize the potential for different outcomes. Gabriel asserts that acknowledging the complexities and choices of the past empowers contemporary society to make informed decisions:

“We're not constrained by the actions of the past... Does that upend the entire story that they're trying to tell?” (13:35)

Perry adds that historians have a responsibility to scrutinize the narratives being presented and understand their motivations:

“Part of the job of the historian... Who does it serve? Who does it harm?” (05:35)

Conclusion

Matthew Gabriel and David M. Perry conclude by emphasizing that a richer, more accurate portrayal of the medieval period can foster a better understanding of modern societal structures and relationships. By dispelling the myths of the Dark Ages and highlighting the "Bright Ages," they advocate for a reevaluation of history that acknowledges both its complexities and its continuities.

Brooke Gladstone wraps up the episode by encouraging listeners to explore the nuanced history presented in The Bright: A New History of Medieval Europe, challenging long-held misconceptions and appreciating the true depth of the medieval era.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Brooke Gladstone: “We know it is a brutal time dominated by white men with mighty steeds and flashing swords or drenched in blood by marauding Vikings...” (00:53)
• David M. Perry: “It suggests that this 1000 year period... was more violent or more barbaric than something else... It seems to me it's harder for us to understand what's really going on and address the problems now.” (03:47)
• Matthew Gabriel: “You're trying to give a very simplistic explanation and say, you know, this is an aberration, so we don't actually have to pay attention to why it's happening.” (03:57)
• David M. Perry: “Whenever you find white supremacists, you'll find medievalism and you'll almost always find murder.” (05:35)
• David M. Perry: “They lived in color. They did not live in a black and white world.” (11:07)
• Matthew Gabriel: “We're not constrained by the actions of the past... Does that upend the entire story that they're trying to tell?” (13:35)

Final Thoughts

This episode of On the Media serves as an enlightening exploration of how historical narratives are constructed and the impact they have on contemporary thought. By challenging the dark stereotypes of the medieval period, Brooke Gladstone, along with Matthew Gabriel and David M. Perry, encourages a more informed and vibrant appreciation of history that recognizes both its darkness and its luminosity.

Transcript

[Sponsor]

ON the Media is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever find yourself playing the budgeting game? Well, with the name your price tool from Progressive, you can find options that fit your budget and potentially lower your bills. Try [e-mail] Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates Price and coverage match Limited by state law not available in all states. When a cold has you down, it's the little comforts that lift you up. A warm blanket, a cup of tea, and a tissue that actually feels good on your skin. Infused with aloe Kleenex. Kleenex Cooling plus Aloe provides a hint of cooling freshness to help your skin feel restored. So whether your skin is feeling dry, chafed or irritated, you're only one wipe away from helping it feel relieved. The next time you have a cold, get a hint of instant cooling relief with new Cleanx Cooling plus Aloe. For whatever happens next, grab Kleenex.

[Brooke Gladstone]

This is ON THE media. I'm Brooke Gladstone. We focus a lot on history in the program and what it can teach us how careful attention to prior conflicts could protect America from possible catastrophe. But history, badly told, can also mislead us. Case in point, today, when we encounter the medieval world, it's mostly a dark time, unenlightened by reason, but also literally gloomy, all bare stone and gray skies. We know it is a brutal time dominated by white men with mighty steeds and flashing swords or drenched in blood by marauding Vikings, as rendered on the History Channel with a Netflix spin off coming soon. I've been told your God is a.

[Matthew Gabriel]

Carpenter, and guess what?

[Brooke Gladstone]

So am I. The Dark Ages have long been a prime setting for fantasy, as on Game.

[David M. Perry]

Of Thrones, a Dothraki wedding without at.

[Matthew Gabriel]

Least three deaths is considered a dull affair.

[Brooke Gladstone]

But in their new book, the Bright A New History of Medieval Europe, historians Matthew Gabriel and David M. Perry trace the harm of the myth of the Dark Ages and illuminate the medieval stories that have mostly escaped our modern gaze. Welcome to on the media. Matt and David, Nice to be here.

[David M. Perry]

Thanks so much.

[Brooke Gladstone]

In your book, you write about the tendency to kick a current problem back into the past by identifying things like terrorism, the death penalty, even pandemic mismanagement as medieval. It's a way of bolstering our 21st century sense of superiority.

[David M. Perry]

This is David and I'll jump in. There's little examples and there's big examples. There was a funny story calling the process of getting a driver's license in Russia medieval. I mean, it's literally to operate a car. They mean it's really complicated bureaucracy, which is really not the medieval bureaucratic state. And then there's a lot of things when we get kind of violence or barbarism that become categorized as medieval. And it suggests that this 1000 year period, let's say in Europe, was more violent or more barbaric than something else. So it was like when President Trump would call ISIS medieval, or when people talk about war as medieval or anything else. You know, before, let's say 400 CE in Europe, there was lots of war and violence and torture. And afterwards there was lots of violence and torture. And in some ways, the power of the mechanized world has only enhanced the ability for people to do harm to each other, imposing distance between us and these things you don't like by calling them medieval. It seems to me it's harder for us to understand what's really going on and address the problems now.

[Brooke Gladstone]

So by calling something medieval and adopting that kind of fatalism, you're like the 40 year old kid who's still blaming his parents.

[Matthew Gabriel]

Yeah, this is Matt. It's kind of like, you know, when a politician says, that's not who we are. Well, it is who we are because we just did that thing. You're trying to give a very simplistic explanation and say, you know, this is an aberration, so we don't actually have to pay attention to why it's happening.

[Brooke Gladstone]

I'm curious though. Some of us think of it as a brutal and a dark, horrible time. But the people who sported symbols of the Crusades at the Unite the right rally in 2017 think of it as a glorious time.

[Matthew Gabriel]

This image of medieval Europe that exists in the popular imagination. It's kind of like a cafeteria, right? You can kind of pick and choose what you like from it, and then you bring it into the modern age and you apply it however you like. So it exists as both dark and gloomy and as a glorious past that needs to be resurrected. Game of Thrones is kind of a great example. We know it as medieval because there's knights on horseback, there's castles. We know it's medieval also because of its barbarism, because it was filled with sexual violence, with people being cruel to one another. And that can be, depending upon your modern politics, how you think about the world today. That can be a good thing or a bad thing. For these white supremacists who bring these narratives into the presence, it's something to be valorized, right, because they associate themselves not with the people who are being persecuted, but the persecutors and they want to place themselves in that space once more.

[Brooke Gladstone]

You wrote it's not a coincidence that the members of the Ku Klux Klan called themselves knights. Whenever you find white supremacists, you'll find medievalism and you'll almost always find murder.

[David M. Perry]

Part of the job of the historian, I think, is to think about what story is being told and why is that story being told this way. Who does it serve? Who does it harm? And so the 19th century, we have people who are inventing the modern discipline of history in Europe, looking out at the imperial conquest and coming up with a historical narrative to explain, almost like a just so story, how they got here and why it was good. They brought in relatively modern concepts, their own ideas of nationalism and scientific racism. Way of explaining the world to build racial hierarchies with whiteness at the top.

[Brooke Gladstone]

You talk about the term the west and this so called clash of civilizations. You wrote that events leading to the sack of Jerusalem in 1099 had been seen as a particular flashpoint in a clash of civilizations. An unending war between Islam and the west, which really means Christianity. I mean, this clash of civilization notion, you can see that in newspapers every day.

[Matthew Gabriel]

If anything haunts us in the modern world, it is this ghost of the clash of civilizations narrative. It's. It's actually a very modern concept to kind of explain in the 80s and 90s, the breakdown between what they saw as kind of west and east, which kind of meant the Islamic world. They look back for origin points and one of the things that they used to point to was the Crusades. They use a justification, in their words, kind of the violent expansion of Islam out of the Arabian Peninsula and the conquest of the Mediterranean world from the Romans in the seventh century and go on from there. All these historical moments. While we're not trying to deny, of course, that there was horrific violence that occurred between groups of Christians and Muslims throughout the European Middle Ages, There's a specific reason what we call the first crusade happened in 1095 and not in 1050 or the 8 hundreds or the 1200s. And that had to do with a particular political and cultural and religious context of Europe. Europe and the papacy and its relationship to various kings and stuff like that. Those historical moments need to be understood in their context. Right. Doing that breaks this idea that there's an unbroken chain of only violence that's existed between the Christian and Islamic world that stretches again from the very birth of Islam until today. Because in those quote unquote, in between spaces, you see a Lot of different relationships and a lot of real possible worlds that emerge from them. And what I mean by that is that Even on the First Crusade, which is launched in 1095, when Pope Urban II calls for a holy war to take Jerusalem from the Muslims, and it very improbably actually happens in 1099, the Christians take the city and massacre many of the inhabitants there.

[Brooke Gladstone]

It seems so irrational, even as you paint it in the book. Yeah, this war that was distant to the people who were preparing to fight it, what they imagined as the place they sought to conquer was a place that didn't really exist.

[Matthew Gabriel]

Sure, many of the people who had participated in this crusade probably had never met a Muslim in their entire lives before then. But they knew it was an existential enemy because it had been created in their mind as such. And that was enough for them to march out to kill people they had never met and probably never heard of before. I mean, this is not foreign to the modern world. The idea that, you know, people could do things for abstract notions like nationalism, if you think about it kind of at the macro level, it shows that, you know, that idea can be incredibly powerful. But if you break it down a little bit, it also shows how permeable it is, if that makes sense. Because even along the way, as the Crusaders are marching east, you know, to kill people in a war, they're making alliances with other Muslim hoops.

[Brooke Gladstone]

You guys wrote that by painting the Middle Ages as hopelessly terrible, bloody, and so on, that we adopt a fatalism. We miss the moments in medieval times when things could have gone in a different direction, when things could have been better. How so? And what's the impact of missing that?

[David M. Perry]

What we don't want to do is adopt a fatalism that a terrible event had to happen, or that when something non terrible happens, that it was random or irrelevant. But to engage it with all the complexity and nuance that we think is. Is in fact true to how things play out. And that can be hard across a thousand years. But there are these moments where contingency pops up. One I like to talk about early in the book is a moment in which a Roman general from Constantinople, we can call him a Byzantine general, is offered the title of emperor in Italy. And this is 30 or 40 years after the Western Roman Empire has technically been fallen. According to the narrative, the Dark Ages has begun, and he was offered this title and he could have taken it, and then we'd have an entirely different story to tell. He didn't take it.

[Brooke Gladstone]

We'd still have A Roman Empire, technically.

[David M. Perry]

I mean, we certainly would have had another maybe century, I don't know, maybe two, of having a pretty clearly defined Roman Empire in Italy.

[Brooke Gladstone]

So let's talk about the Bright Ages. It begins with a striking scene plucked from the year 430 on the east coast of Italy. Artists are pressing shards of glass infused with the blue of lapis lazuli into a ceiling, turning it into the richest of blue skies. Why do we associate medieval times with a dull stone wall rather than with a luminous mosaic?

[David M. Perry]

Matt usually says, but I'm gonna steal it from him. They lived in color. They did not live in a black and white world. And in some cases, the colors on the stones have faded, and in other cases, we just somehow don't look at the colors that are left. We've worked very hard to not write a Pollyanna version of the European Middle Ages. Blood is bright red, fire can illuminate, but it also could burn books. And we've tried to work within that dichotomy.

[Brooke Gladstone]

We don't generally associate medieval times with democracy. Is that because there wasn't any.

[David M. Perry]

There was lots of democracy, and we're still surrounded by medieval democracy today. Medieval people like to form associations with each other of different sorts. You know, fraternal organizations, you could think, like the Elks Club, but also trade organizations, you can think unions, church communities. They would get together, they would write often really complicated bylaws, and they would vote on stuff. There are medieval governments that were democratic. Italian cities voted for mayors, they voted for aldermen. So the formal trappings of governmental democracy absolutely existed, but it's much deeper than that. Medieval people love to vote. And every university that has a faculty senate is fundamentally reenacting a medieval process. And if you start looking within your social clubs or within your unions or any places like that where there's bylaws and voting, I would encourage people to see that as fundamentally medieval in the best possible way.

[Brooke Gladstone]

Yeah. I mean, it wasn't a universal franchise.

[David M. Perry]

But when is it? When and where in human history is it really a universal franchise? Yeah, there's always a definition of who gets to be a citizen and who doesn't, what ages, what genders. I like living in a society that is a much more expansive notion of the franchise.

[Brooke Gladstone]

For the time being.

[David M. Perry]

For the time being. Right. I hope we can defend that. But, you know, medieval Venice, which is the city that I study, there were a lot of men in that city who voted for their government, and certainly it was at least as representative as something like ancient Athens. We don't just get to write medieval Venice out of the Middle Ages because it doesn't conveniently fit the model of kings and queens and men with sticks.

[Brooke Gladstone]

I'm curious though. If we really did as a culture understand the period as you do, what do we stand to gain?

[Matthew Gabriel]

That's the million dollar question, right? Because it's kind of the so wet question. The importance of thinking about history, as David said earlier as one of contingency, really demonstrates that although structures play a role, there's a limited number of things we can do. Sometimes in our society we still do have choices. You know, political budget is a certain number of dollars. We can put it on X or we can put it on Y. You know, we've made a choice. That's not a foreordained conclusion. So if we're talking about like this idea of the clash of civilizations, if we focus on the reason that people chose violence in certain cases, but chose understanding or respect in other cases, those can be models for how we relate to interreligious tradition relationships for the future. We're not constrained by the actions of the past. When people are telling you that the past is very simple, that you can draw a straight line from X until Y in the modern day, they're selling something and we have to ask what are they selling and why are they selling it? And what if we look at it from a different perspective? Does that upend the entire story that they're trying to tell and the entire process product that they're trying to pedal?

[Brooke Gladstone]

Matthew Gabriel and David M. Perry are the authors of the Bright A New History of Medieval Europe. Thank you very much.

[Matthew Gabriel]

Our pleasure.

[David M. Perry]

Really just a joy.

[Brooke Gladstone]

Thanks. Thanks for listening. Please check out the big show on Friday. It usually gets posted around dinner time.

[Sponsor]

Since WNYC's first broadcast in 1924, we've been dedicated to creating the kind of content we know the world needs. Since then, New York Public Radio's rigorous journalism has gone on to win a Peabody Award and a Dupont Columbia Award, among others. In addition to this award winning reporting, your sponsorship also supports inspiring storytelling and extraordinary music that is free and accessible to all. To get in touch and find out more, visit sponsorship.wnyc.org.