
Facts under fire; a viral YouTube channel claims to foster ‘radical empathy.’
Loading summary
Tucker Carlson
Why should anybody trust numbers?
Brooke Gladstone
Said the president right after he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics for accurately reporting the job numbers. A new low in the war on facts. From WNYC in New York, this is on the media. I'm Brooke Gladstone.
Michael Ohinger
And I'm Michael Ohinger. A rare coalition of private money and state power is trying to sue the watchdog Media Matters out of existence.
Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson described what he viewed as the three biggest threats, and it was the Washington Post, the German government, and Media Matters. And, you know, it's like, oh, my gosh.
Brooke Gladstone
Plus, the YouTube channel Jubilee says it wants to bridge political divides, but its debate format looks more like a firing squad.
Mehdi Hassan
If Jubilee had come to me and said, you'll be debating one guy who says he's a fascist and another guy who tells you to get out of the country, I'd have said, I'll pass, thanks. I'm washing my hair.
Michael Ohinger
It's all coming up after this. From WNYC in New York, this is on the Media. I'm Michael Ohinger.
Brooke Gladstone
And I'm Brooke Gladstone. Ever since I got into this business, there have been times that have served as sharp reminders that the mission is to speak truth to power. But the current moment suggests that perhaps the more crucial mission, especially since power is no longer listening, is to speak truth to each other. Not merely to inform, but to reassure you who listen that, no, you are not going crazy. And by truth, I don't mean the higher ones, the moral ones. I mean just plain facts. That's why we decided to take a few minutes to contextualize the president's most ambitious and by far his most successful project, fact eradication. So let's start here. On October 1st, he fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics hours.
Angelo Carusone
After a stunning government report that the job market is considerably worse than previously thought.
Tucker Carlson
President Trump posting on Truth Social that the jobs report was rigged to, quote, make a great Republican success look less stellar. Why should anybody trust numbers? I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election. So you know what I did? I fired her.
Brooke Gladstone
Erica McIntyre, a labor economist with 20 years of public service under her belt. She headed the team of statisticians responsible for revising the recent employment numbers sharply downward. Philip Bump noted in his column that such noteworthy revisions often align with great economic upheaval, like the Great Recession in 2008, 2009, and the COVID pandemic in 2020 and 2021. So what was happening this past April?
Angelo Carusone
President Donald Trump's slate of Sweeping tariffs is set to go into effect later this week.
Michael Ohinger
Stocks plunging Friday amid the tariff uncertainty.
Tucker Carlson
And fears of looming trade wars.
Brooke Gladstone
When President Trump doesn't get the beautiful numbers he seeks, he offers alternatives, even if they defy the immutable laws of mathematics.
Tucker Carlson
You know, we've cut drug prices by 1200-1300-1400-1500%. I don't mean 50%. I mean 14, 1500%.
Brooke Gladstone
In June, he claimed to have cut the price of eggs by 400%. But a quantity cannot decrease by more than 100% of itself. Even I know that. And I don't have an uncle who taught at mit. As for matters of war and peace.
Andreas Giorgio
A lot of very beautiful wars have been settled.
Brooke Gladstone
Odd word choice there.
Tucker Carlson
India, Pakistan, nuclear. Look at Cambodia. Just recently, it was going to be a war. I settled that up. And I settle it up with trade.
Brooke Gladstone
The Nobel Prize. So near and yet so far, because it's rigged.
Tucker Carlson
Settled that one. Kosovo, you know about that. With Serbia, I think I settled averaging about a war a month.
Brooke Gladstone
While the US Played a role in some negotiations and ceasefires, it didn't do it alone. And ongoing tensions and violence in those places suggest that such agreements do not amount to a durable peace. He counts on us not to follow news of faraway places. As for wars, we can't help following the ones he was going to settle on day one because the other guy was too stupid.
Tucker Carlson
Well, of course it was sarcastic, but you've now been in office for five months and five days.
Mehdi Hassan
Why have you not been able to.
Tucker Carlson
End the Ukraine war? Because it's more difficult than people would have any idea.
Brooke Gladstone
You think? Meanwhile, the President's war on facts, which cannot be negotiated, is waged with addition and subtraction. A report from the President. President's Make America Healthy Again Commission included citations to non existent studies regarding such topics as children's asthma, medication and mental illness. Now, that's addition. But these days, the chief weapon is subtraction.
Angelo Carusone
The White House is taking another step.
Tucker Carlson
To make it harder to find big.
Angelo Carusone
Legally mandated scientific reports on climate change.
Michael Ohinger
Several CDC pages have disappeared. Key resources for healthcare providers are gone.
Angelo Carusone
I am in Nashville, Tennessee, at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association. Sadly, without a lot of the government statisticians that are usually here for the.
Brooke Gladstone
White House, it seems that public enemy number one is data.
Angelo Carusone
The guardrails are gone.
Brooke Gladstone
Amy o' Hara is a research professor at Georgetown's massive Data Institute and the president of the association of Public Data Users. She used to work at the U.S. census Bureau.
Angelo Carusone
These institutions that have systems in place to provide reliable data about our workforce, about labor in the United States. There was a leader at the helm of that organization that was just following the rules, using data inputs, using existing protocols, providing information as they always did. And because the numbers were apparently politically inconvenient, that person was told that they cooked the books and they could no longer serve in that role.
Brooke Gladstone
O' Hara says that the White House has also shuttered advisory committees which were.
Angelo Carusone
The channel people used to understand updates in methodology or new products coming out or the discontinuation of other products that has been shut down. So all of those advisory committees, including an important one called FESAC, about federal economic statistics, is one of the ones that were shut down. They produce numbers that people now scratch their head and say, what is the accuracy of that number? Can I rely on that number?
Brooke Gladstone
Ah, but that's a key component to the President's fact eradication project. Convince Americans not to trust numbers or anything else.
Tucker Carlson
Why should anybody trust numbers?
Stacia Underwood
We have to fight an uphill battle against all these accusations which were trying to undermine our credibility.
Brooke Gladstone
Andreas Giorgio is a visiting lecturer and scholar in statistics at amherst College. In 2010, he became head of the first independent statistical agency in Greece, lstat, which then issued a report showing Greece's huge deficit was even worse than previously reported. In fact, the deficit as a percent of the gdp, which is roughly defined as the value of all goods and services a country produces during a specific time, had reached completely unsustainable levels.
Stacia Underwood
It reached 15.4% of GDP.
Brooke Gladstone
Members of the EU are required never to exceed 3%.
Stacia Underwood
And the debt increased by 11.7% of GDP, which meant that the debt to GDP ratio for Greece reached 126.8% of GDP. This, of course, meant that the fiscal picture was even worse than anticipated. Greece lost access to the markets. It couldn't go out and borrow anymore.
Brooke Gladstone
All this landed very hard on the people of Greece. The unemployment rate passed 25% in the following years. Since the deficit was so out of control, Greece had to adopt tough austerity measures. Rising politicians in Greece, seeking a scapegoat.
Stacia Underwood
Rallied around the idea that the statistical office had put Greece in the eye of the hurricane. The prosecutor for economic crimes began a preliminary criminal investigation against me on the basis of statements that were made by various people, including politicians. The theory was that Greece was somehow subject to some conspiracy and that statistics had played a role in that.
Brooke Gladstone
He spent the next 14 years battling criminal and civil investigations. He was sentenced to. He never served time because he was able to get his cases overturned. But at one point, he took a case all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, where Greece was convicted for not providing him a fair trial. This allowed Giorgio to reopen his case in Greece. He has another hearing on it in the Greek Supreme Court next month. His goal, full exoneration.
Stacia Underwood
That is very important, not just for me personally, but for Greek statisticians and statisticians everywhere that want to follow the rules. It has been, of course, a difficult time for me and for my family. My father suffered quite a bit. It might have contributed to my father's passing. The family had run entirely out of money to pay the lawyers. Eventually there was crowdfunding. People helped us a lot. And also a very good legal firm in Greece offered to take over the cases at no cost. It would have cost me millions of dollars to be here. And it has definitely, you know, caused a lot of problems for me, too, especially as a. Until very recently, as a single father of a little girl.
Tucker Carlson
But I can tell you that it.
Stacia Underwood
Was the good fight. I'm glad that I did it.
Brooke Gladstone
The good fight is still very much a fight all around the world, like in Brazil.
Stacia Underwood
Bolsonaro, the president there, fired the head of inpe, the agency that controls the satellites of Brazil, and it produces the statistical data on deforestation, among other things. So it produced figures that showed that deforestation increased significantly in 2019, when Bolsonaro was in office. And Bolsonaro didn't like that and fired the chief of the institution. Then we had the case where Erdogan, in Turkey, he fired the head of the Turkish Institute for Statistics, the agency that produced inflation figures. He felt that the inflation figures were overstated. So you have this string of interventions and interferences. These are harmful to official statistics and to this important information that is the basis on which society carries out not only its economic affairs and its social affairs, but also its democracy. They are extremely essential for democracy and for accountability of the politicians.
Brooke Gladstone
The Washington Post reported Wednesday about a leaked draft report that shows the administration is planning to eliminate or downplay accounts of prisoner abuse, corruption, LGBTQ discrimination, of course, and other alleged abuses. The White House says the reports will be shortened for, quote, readability. Right. But even when defending facts, one has to concede that data can be cold. And it's well understood that the bigger the number of afflicted people, the less sympathy they engender. It's a paradox Stalin understood when he famously said, a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. But despite all that, the truth is numbers, stats, facts, to coin a phrase, are people too.
Michael Ohinger
Coming up, why are Elon Musk's ex, the FTC, and multiple state attorneys general trying to destroy a media watchdog group?
Brooke Gladstone
This is on the media.
Tucker Carlson
The world is on the brink.
Michael Ohinger
Wars, contentious elections, disinformation spreading at warp speed, and Donald Trump at the center.
Tucker Carlson
Of all of it.
Michael Ohinger
But what does it mean for the rest of us?
Tucker Carlson
Every week on Pots of the World, Tommy Vitor and I cut through the noise to explain how global power is shifting. No jargon, no homework, just clear, honest conversations about what's happening and why it matters.
Michael Ohinger
From breaking news to long simmering international.
Tucker Carlson
Conflicts, we dissect it all with critical.
Michael Ohinger
Analysis and some jokes that will surely.
Tucker Carlson
Embarrass our children one day. Tune in to Pod Save the World every Wednesday. Wherever you get your podcasts or catch.
Michael Ohinger
It on YouTube, this is on the Media. I'm Michael Ohinger.
Brooke Gladstone
And I'm Brooke Gladstone. Media Matters for America is an avowedly liberal watchdog group that follows and fact checks right wing outlets like Fox News Channel, Newsmax, Steve Bannon's War Room, and the Tucker Carlson Show. Places where the lies and misdirection that inform American policy and American life pick up steam. So it was inevitable that when death came knocking for the organization, it would be someone like Elon Musk holding the scythe by way of a lawsuit or a barrage of them. Elon Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 for a report reported $44 billion, renamed it X and promised to ease up on its content moderation, free speech, you know, let everybody's freak flag or Confederate flag fly. But when Media Matters published a series of investigations in November 23 that showed that ads on X were appearing next to anti Semitic or pro Nazi content. This, by the way, after Musk claimed that he had new tools in place to assuage advertisers fears that their content would show up next to such extremist posts. Media Matters showed that these tools weren't working. So companies like Sony, Apple, IBM and Warner Brothers pulled their ads from X, costing musk an estimated $75 million.
Tucker Carlson
You know, cause and effect is a little unclear because that was the same week that Musk embraced the white genocide conspiracy theory. So that's what the fight about discovery is now is what was really motivating a lot of these advertisers decisions.
Brooke Gladstone
Angelo Carson is the president of Media Matters, which was initially sued By X in 2023, first in Texas, then in Ireland and Singapore. Then, following X, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey both opened investigations into the nonprofit. Media Matters sued everyone back, including X, saying that the social media platform's own terms and conditions required X's legal actions to be launched exclusively in California. The judge agreed, halting the Ireland case. Both the Investigations by state AGs were also shot down in court.
Tucker Carlson
A lot of times people compare this to Hulk Hogan's litigation against Gawker that was financed by some billionaires that ultimately bankrupted the company. And I understand why that's a comparison, but this is so different because that was just a civil lawsuit. There wasn't a combination of private power and state power to target Gawker. That's what's happening here.
Brooke Gladstone
How have you done in court on these challenges other than that very important decision in California.
Tucker Carlson
So the decision in California was one success. The other thing I would note is that our lawsuit against both state AGs was successful.
Brooke Gladstone
Paxton and Bailey, Texas and Missouri, those are no longer on the table.
Tucker Carlson
That's correct. They were shut down. We received an injunction against them, and Andrew Bailey asked to settle with us so that he didn't have to go through a discovery. So that was closed. Paxton appealed the decision that we received in the district court level to the Circuit Court. The D.C. circuit Court and the D.C. circuit Court upheld the lower court's decision in our favor. And the other thing is the substance of these rulings. Judges, whenever they look at this, often describe it as a campaign of government harassment, which is how the D.C. courts had described. Whenever they touch on the merits, the underlying facts, they always describe them as either meritless or baseless. And what's so incredible about all of this is that we barely had a moment to enjoy the relief of not being under state scrutiny. Because just as we were putting to bed the civil investigative demands from the states, this FTC one was now blossoming.
Brooke Gladstone
Tell me about the Federal Trade Commission case. What are the grounds?
Tucker Carlson
I don't know.
Brooke Gladstone
What do they say then?
Tucker Carlson
We're a nonprofit. We don't engage in commercial activity. The FTC doesn't even have any real authority over us. We're not in trade, we're not in commerce.
Brooke Gladstone
I mean, what information did they want?
Tucker Carlson
They want to know information about funding sources in some cases. They want to know who's worked here for the past six years. They want to have insight into the editing process and how the reporting and journalism gets done. They want all kinds of communications that we've had with third parties. Seems to be one about retaliation. And the other part that I think reinforces that is that, you know, Andrew Ferguson, who's the chairman, you know, has talked about these concerns around, you know, what they call advertiser boycotts. There was a recent merger between two very large media buyers and in their approval of that merger, the ftc, they said, look, we'll approve this deal, but only under the following condition. You're no longer allowed to remove ads based off of politics or ideology. Meaning, really? Yes, this is news to me. It's such an incredible sort of tell or reveal there.
Brooke Gladstone
If this is a purely free market capitalist society, they should be able to put their money wherever they want.
Tucker Carlson
They're not just trying to change politics. Now, Project 2025 showed us that, and Steve Bannon, I think describes it so effectively is that politics is downstream from culture. And for them, so much of the work is being done to reshape and transform our culture. This is very similar to what we're seeing with colleges, right?
Brooke Gladstone
And very similar.
Tucker Carlson
You know, it's like, well, de, you know, you have to pay all these funds for the damage that you did with your DEI policies. Because of the work that we do, which is reporting and research and sort of illustrating these trends in the media landscape. There are many people on the right that really, truly despise us. And it's worth keeping in mind that so much of the Trump administration is pulled from the right wing media fever swamps. Three of Andrew Ferguson's senior people that he brought on board to the FTC have all attacked Media Matters vigorously in the past. You know, describing us as a cancer and all sorts of other things, saying we should be in jail and prison.
Brooke Gladstone
The FTC says that you're engaging in collusion and that this needs to be investigated, that you're trying to disrupt the marketplace under consumer protection laws.
Tucker Carlson
That was what they would argue. It's very similar to what the state AGs were claiming was that we were interfering with commerce in their respective states and that's why we needed to be investigated. It is a strong testament. You know, the advertising industry is not small. You know, it's a multi billion dollar. It's. It's this idea that that somehow we're the wizard behind the curtain is part of the right wing narrative. I mean, Tucker Carlson once described what he viewed as the three biggest threats. And it was the Washington Post, the German government and Media Matters. And you know, it's like, oh my gosh, you know, or I remember when Roche Limbaugh at one point, and again, this is somebody that had you know, 20 million listeners. He was lamenting that we were, quote, in the midst of mob rule run by the trolls at Media Matters. In their minds, you know, we are just so overwhelming.
Brooke Gladstone
So hydra headed.
Michael Ohinger
Yeah.
Brooke Gladstone
So how are you going to be able to pay your legal bills? You've observed that in any other environment, you would stop doing what you do, focus on beating back the legal assault, and then pick up on the work after the lawsuits were settled. But now you're being expected to do both at the same time.
Tucker Carlson
I think that's a fair expectation. Our biggest study that we've ever produced in 21 years in terms of its reach actually came out this year while we were under this litigation. We did a massive thing with the New York Times shortly before the 2024 election that looked at YouTube election misinformation for six months. Was this huge thing that they published in coordination with our research that was in the midst of this litigation. Our supporters have mostly stayed with us, but we haven't received support from the major foundations and new people that care about civic spaces. And that's really what this fight's about.
Brooke Gladstone
Right? Because they're afraid, because they don't know about it. Why?
Tucker Carlson
I think it's a combination of a few things. One I think is legitimate fear. Musk himself has threatened retaliation against individuals, or at least that's the perception that exists in many and say, oh, I don't want to touch that. My gosh. The other part is the Trump administration has all of these big players are folding. And it gets where you say, how could you possibly win this fight? CBS had to cave. If ABC had to cave, what chance does Media Matters have?
Brooke Gladstone
You know, you say that to get to the finish line, you need five or six million bucks. You also say that if this were happening in 2017, you'd have it. You'd be resistance heroes.
Tucker Carlson
If this was 2017 and the Trump administration was attacking us like this, we would be resistance heroes. Because back then it was considered a badge of honor. It was a demonstration that you were standing up. And the fear, it was present, but it wasn't front and center. Now, I think within the first few months, the Trump administration has successfully illustrated to many that they're serious, that they will punish you. I often imagine a scenario in which George Soros and Barack Obama were going after a right wing media figure like a Charlie Kirk, that they were both putting all these resources into trying to destroy and announced it, that their plan was to destroy Kirk. It would be the biggest story ever and every potential right wing donor would be out there saying, no, no, no, not even because they necessarily want to defend Charlie Kirk or stick it to Obama and Soros, but because they would say, we cannot let that tactic become acceptable. And I think that's my big warning for everyone is that if you don't take this tactic and show that it doesn't work, they'll just keep using it over and over and over again. And every time they use it, it will become sharper. One of the incredible things that came out of the Paxton investigation or the lawsuits around that is there was this argument in court that his team was making that essentially amounted to the fact that if anybody in Texas reads a news article that has any effect on anything related to Texas, that they have the authority to go out there and investigate all the reporting leading up to it. The journalists, their notes, their research.
Brooke Gladstone
That was the case they made.
Tucker Carlson
That was one of the arguments that they were making at the time. Is it all centered around this nexus of consumer protection?
Brooke Gladstone
And what did the judge say?
Tucker Carlson
I mean, the judge obviously didn't accept it because they lost. But I think it shows the point of fighting because even then when we sued the ags first, you know, we had very similar questions. Is this worth the money? Shouldn't you just try to negotiate? Shouldn't you wait until they fight you in their state courts? And the answer to that is no, because it's ceding the ground to this encroachment and attack on basic, not just freedoms, but basic civic rights. I know resources are constrained across the board, but for me, this is not a resource problem.
Brooke Gladstone
Unexpectedly, though, some figures and groups on the right have offered Media Matters some grudging respect and even in a few cases, support.
Tucker Carlson
This is the one thing that has been pleasantly surprising. We've had conservative right leaning organizations that have filed briefs on our behalf basically saying, hey, you should support Media Matters here on this issue because it is a free speech issue.
Brooke Gladstone
And, and you're talking about groups like.
Tucker Carlson
There are some organizations that been funded by the Koch network. Another group is fire, which is a free speech organization that in the past I would have described it as a conservative organization. And outside of the amicus brief, which is, I think, a very formal thing. Even people like Steve Bannon, who've been, you know, acknowledging our sophistication and contributions and maybe even appreciating our toughness a little bit, that's the stuff that it's like, well, at least they're being consistent. We've seen so many figures, they just capitulate to Trumpism. Right. When you're in this type of work, so much of the work becomes the fight itself. You lose sight that you're not just stuck in trench warfare indefinitely. That actually some of the people you're engaging with are honest brokers too, even if you disagree. And as terrible as all this has been, and it has been almost entirely terrible, some of those bright spots have been reminders that even when it feels like so much of our culture is, you know, being transformed in the most destructive ways, there are actually strange bedfellows that align around the basics of what our country is supposed to be.
Brooke Gladstone
And you think you can survive?
Michael Ohinger
Yeah.
Tucker Carlson
I mean, the short term is they look, money is the hard part. And there may be some more curve balls and it may get worse. We are in a posture now of finding a way to balance these complicated legal attacks, this multi front battle and our mission. And I don't want to sacrifice any more of our mission. I do believe in persistence. I could go back to a laundry list of things that always seemed impossible when we first started them, and then in six months became more real and more possible. And then in a year after that, it happened. And so I think my own experience has said, yeah, you know what, we're on firm ground and you can keep hitting us, but I think we have a path ahead.
Brooke Gladstone
Angelo, thank you very much.
Tucker Carlson
Thank you so much.
Brooke Gladstone
Angelo Carazone is the president of Media Matters for America.
Michael Ohinger
Coming up, the biggest debate show. That's not a debate.
Brooke Gladstone
This is on the media.
Michael Ohinger
The world is on the brink. Wars, contentious elections, disinformation spreading at warp.
Tucker Carlson
Speed, and Donald Trump at the center of all things. But what does it mean for the rest of us? Every week on Pod Save the World.
Michael Ohinger
Tommy Vitor and I cut through the.
Tucker Carlson
Noise to explain how global power is shifting. No jargon, no homework, just clear, honest conversations about what's happening and why it matters.
Michael Ohinger
From breaking news to long simmering international.
Tucker Carlson
Conflicts, we dissect it all with critical.
Michael Ohinger
Analysis and some jokes that will surely.
Tucker Carlson
Embarrass our children one day. Tune in to Pod Save the World every Wednesday. Wherever you get your podcasts or catch.
Brooke Gladstone
It on YouTube, this is on the media. I'm Brooke Gladstone.
Michael Ohinger
And I'm Michael Oinger. The latest episode of south park just so happens to perfectly set up a piece that we've been working on.
Tucker Carlson
Hello, and welcome to the third annual Charlie Kirk Award for young Master Debaters.
Michael Ohinger
More and more young people today are learning to fight for America through masturbation. Not only were you featured in this episode, Charlie, your name was in bright lights as the Charlie Kirk Award. It was basically an entire homage to the genre that you've popularized. The real life Charlie Kirk, a far right podcaster known for arguing with liberal college students, was showered with praise from his co hosts.
Mehdi Hassan
You've transformed the entire dialogue that exists in America between young men and crazy.
Tucker Carlson
Woke, psychotic young people.
Michael Ohinger
Because even scathing satire from south park is attention. And in 2025, attention is everything.
Tucker Carlson
It's taken over TikTok. It's taken over all social media.
Michael Ohinger
It's true that political debates, and not just among right wing outrage merchants, have become one of the major ways that people engage with the news. There was the nearly five hour Israel, Palestine debate on Lex Friedman's podcast last year. Was Palestine the only spot of land on Earth?
Mehdi Hassan
Yes, basically that was the problem.
Tucker Carlson
The Jews couldn't immigrate.
Michael Ohinger
What about the United States? And There's Piers Morgan's YouTube channel, Uncensored, which routinely devolves into shouting matches between pundits.
Mehdi Hassan
He just called me a pervert.
Tucker Carlson
He will be sued now for defamation and we will be able to resolve this. I guarantee you that he will be sued.
Mehdi Hassan
In my understanding, you are a perfect woman.
Michael Ohinger
Some of these debates are clearly designed for sensationalism and partisan polemics. Some are more educational. Some even try to crown a winner, like the Monk Debate, a semiannual Canadian event that recently hosted Ezra Klein and Kellyanne Conway.
Angelo Carusone
The golden age of America is upon us. I see the small businesses that feel they can survive and thrive with less regulation, with lower taxes, with more energy independence.
Tucker Carlson
No, I don't think we're in a golden age.
Mehdi Hassan
I almost like, don't think it needs.
Michael Ohinger
To be argued this heavily. Are we even in a decent age? These spectacles, of course, are hardly new. For precedent, you could point to the televised Gore Vidal, William buckley debates of 1968, which were ostensibly rarefied policy discussions that still went off the rails.
Tucker Carlson
Now listen, you stop calling me a crypto Nazi.
Michael Ohinger
Let's stop calling names. Or early panel shows like CNN's Crossfire, which in 1982 famously hosted the KKK's national leader.
Tucker Carlson
Wait a minute, Mr. Wizard. You believe in the final solution, which is black repatriation to Africa. I'm not going to be cut off.
Mehdi Hassan
I'm not going to be shut off either.
Tucker Carlson
You're running around on a bedsheet. I don't have the bedsheet.
Michael Ohinger
But at least in terms of scale, pure metrics, nothing to date has transfixed viewers quite like Jubilee, a YouTube debate channel that The Atlantic compared to the Jerry Springer show with Gen Z appeal.
Tucker Carlson
You have no idea what you're talking about. They don't. You think 300,000 minors are lost in America? Are you crazy? I'm saying.
Angelo Carusone
Millions, tens of millions of people watch Jubilee. They've got billions of collective views at this point. Jubilee is a YouTube behemoth.
Michael Ohinger
Taylor Lorenz is a tech journalist who writes the User Mag newsletter. She's been following the meteoric rise of Jubilee. And whether you love it, hate it, or you've never heard about it before, Jubilee has become an undeniably important forum for changing hearts and minds. Its founder, Jason Wiley, came up with the idea for the company after the election of Donald Trump in 2016.
Angelo Carusone
Jason was surprised by what happened with the election and also just trying to make sense of what was happening with the country.
Andreas Giorgio
I saw huge polarization on both sides. It was very jarring for me.
Michael Ohinger
Jason, speaking with Taylor Lorenz on her podcast Power User.
Andreas Giorgio
I felt like there was just this huge white space in the center for young people, which was about empathy, about dialogue, about nuance, which unfortunately at that time, and unfortunately now, it felt like we weren't seeing. So I had this crazy idea at the time where, like, could we create a media company that is not about featuring just the left side or just the right side, but featuring true human voices and finding some kind of middle ground there? And I decided to raise a small round of capital and launch Jubilee Media.
Michael Ohinger
He ended up raising $650,000, telling investors that he thought filming tough conversations could be hugely lucrative. And he was right.
Andreas Giorgio
One of our first big shows that we created was a show called Middle Ground. What it would do is it would bring together two, quote unquote opposing sides. But rather than just squaring off for a Fox or CNN style debate or kind of everyone yelling at each other, we said, is there a way for us to find middle grounds between conservatives and liberals, or between Christians and atheists, or even between flat Earthers and round Earthers?
Tucker Carlson
I'm what you call a globe denier. This is a brilliant opportunity to speak. We've been suppressed, censored by mainstream media. Alternative media is just a thing of beauty for me.
Michael Ohinger
This is one of three flat Earthers who debated three scientists in what's become the most popular episode of middle ground, with 31 million views.
Mehdi Hassan
My point is that these experiments clearly.
Michael Ohinger
Show that the Earth is global.
Mehdi Hassan
And you don't need to go outside the globe to see it's global. It's a future. You told me you want the evidence.
Michael Ohinger
The critique of you guys which you've.
Tucker Carlson
Seen is like, are you kidding me? You're putting a flat Earther out there? Like, as though this is a reasonable point of view.
Michael Ohinger
Semaphore's Ben Smith interviewing Jason Lee on the Mixed Signals podcast.
Andreas Giorgio
I think that the flat Earther one is the one that we had to discuss quite a bit about, hey, where are the bounds by which we wouldn't go? But one of the principles we talk about a lot at Jubilee is what is this idea of what we call radical empathy? For example, there was a woman who was really incredible. She lost her husband and when her husband was on his deathbed, he became like a full on flat Earther.
Angelo Carusone
So my husband actually brought home this movie talking about how the moon landing.
Andreas Giorgio
Was fake once he had passed. I think that she feels like this is like part of her way to connect with him. Right Again, does that make me believe that the earth is flat? Absolutely not. But do I understand or have some sort of empathy towards like that experience? I'm like, yeah, I do.
Angelo Carusone
I think Jason is naive. I think that it is a monster that Jason does not realize he's created. And I think he is deluding himself into thinking that it's a lot less harmful than it is.
Michael Ohinger
Taylor Lorenz I think it's more of like YouTuber Brain. What is YouTuber Brain?
Angelo Carusone
YouTube rewards rage bait. Mostly the entire Internet rewards rage bait. That's what algorithms reward. And so if you can create these viral clips of people saying extremely shocking things, you will succeed. And if you're making millions and millions of dollars, it's really hard to change course and say, actually I want to make less money.
Michael Ohinger
Jason Lee did not respond to our request for an interview. If he had, I would have asked him about the channel's most successful format, the one that's generated quite a bit of controversy in recent weeks. A show called Surrounded, which is this.
Angelo Carusone
Round robin debate style video where it's one person in the middle and then a group of 20 people that disagree with them around them.
Michael Ohinger
Hello everyone. I am Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, and I am surrounded by 20 woke college kids.
Tucker Carlson
I'm Ben Shapiro and I'm co founder.
Michael Ohinger
Of the Daily Wire and host of the Ben Shapiro show.
Tucker Carlson
And today I'm surrounded by 25 Kamala Harris supporters.
Angelo Carusone
The Ben Shapiro episode was the fifth most viewed piece of political content on YouTube during the election.
Michael Ohinger
Democrats and nonpartisan experts have also starred in Surrounded videos, though they tend to get fewer views.
Mehdi Hassan
I'm Pete Buttigieg and today I'm surrounded by 25 undecided voters.
Tucker Carlson
I'm Dr. Mikhail Varshavsky, better known as Dr. Mike across social media. I'm a board certified family medicine physician who makes content off improving health literacy. And today I'm surrounded by 20 vaccine skeptics.
Michael Ohinger
That Dr. Mike video, which has 10 million views, is interesting for a few reasons. The way the format works is that the high profile person in the middle, in this case Dr. Mike, starts each round of the debate by stating a prompt.
Tucker Carlson
My next claim is that RFK Jr. Is a public health threat.
Michael Ohinger
And then on the count of three, the 20 anti vaxxers can race to a seat in the middle to challenge.
Tucker Carlson
Him.
Michael Ohinger
Leading to this exchange.
Brooke Gladstone
How is it that he's a villain? How are we a villain if some of these vaccine creators and scientists are the ones saying we should not get.
Tucker Carlson
Is there anything I could say today that would change your mind?
Brooke Gladstone
I'm just asking your opinion.
Tucker Carlson
Hey, I'm asking you a question.
Brooke Gladstone
Probably not because I actually read and study.
Tucker Carlson
I would like to give you my knowledge, my experience and what I've seen in the hospital system. But if you're telling me right now, no matter what I say, you're not going to change your mind, is there any value to that?
Michael Ohinger
That clip pretty much sums up the entire one and a half hour video. Every time Dr. Mike attempts to debunk medical misinformation, his opponents cut him off or ignore him, talking about how they'd done their own research and didn't trust mainstream science. One comment under the video that received 143,000 likes reads quote, this didn't feel like a debate. It feels like 20 people venting as if it's therapy. After the video came out, Dr. Mike revealed that it was his idea. He pitched this video to Jubilee.
Tucker Carlson
I was watching Jubilee and saw a 20 verse 1 episode and I said, wow, wouldn't it be a good idea if it was a doctor versus anti vampire?
Mehdi Hassan
The only accurate way to report that one out of four Americans are skeptical of global warming is to say a.
Tucker Carlson
Poll finds that one out of four.
Mehdi Hassan
Americans are wrong about something.
Michael Ohinger
John Oliver, Speaking on his HBO show.
Tucker Carlson
In 2014, a survey of thousands of.
Mehdi Hassan
Scientific papers that took a position on climate Change found that 97% endorsed the position that humans are causing global warming.
Tucker Carlson
And I think I know why people.
Mehdi Hassan
Still think this issue is open to debate. Because on TV it is.
Michael Ohinger
He then brings out two people for a mock debate. Bill Nye, who believes climate change is real, and a denier who Doesn't. The problem here, Oliver says, is that a split screen TV debate implies that these two positions are equal.
Mehdi Hassan
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Before we begin on, in the interest of mathematical balance, I'm going to bring out two people who agree with you. Climate skeptics and Bill Nye. I'm also going to bring out 96 other scientists. It's a little unwieldy, but this is the only way you can actually have a representative discussion.
Michael Ohinger
A mathematically balanced debate about COVID 19 vaccines would look the same way because an estimated 97% of medical scientists say those vaccines are safe. And yet Jubilee flipped it. 20 so called skeptics were pitted against one expert because that's more provocative. And there are other ways the channel's producers stack the deck for drama. Take the February episode of surrounded, titled 1 Conservative vs 25 LGBTQ Activists.
H
So I saw that they were casting for a Jubilee video, so I sent in my application and that's pretty much how it started.
Michael Ohinger
Stacia Underwood is a 26 year old activist who's received a lot of attention online since appearing in that Jubilee video.
H
My intention was to hopefully meet some more trans women. And I knew that it was a huge opportunity. I knew that it could bring me a lot of exposure, negatively and positively.
Michael Ohinger
Did the producers tell you anything about who you'd be speaking with? Just that they'd be conservative.
H
I had no clue. I definitely wasn't expecting it to be somebody that was so hateful.
Tucker Carlson
My next claim is that transgenderism should be eradicated from public life entirely.
Michael Ohinger
The conservative in the middle turned out to be Daily Wire host Michael Knowles. Stacia sprinted for the chair in the middle.
Brooke Gladstone
Hello.
Mehdi Hassan
Hello.
Michael Ohinger
Which she says was scripted to make it look like she was competing with other people.
H
My first thought was that it was absurd because transgenderism isn't real. We are transgender people. How are you going to get people to stop being trans?
Tucker Carlson
I think we're going to tell boys that they're not girls.
H
So we're going to tell boys that they're not girls and they're going to listen.
Tucker Carlson
Yeah, basically, yeah.
Michael Ohinger
That's what we've done for most of history. And I can promise you to God.
H
That I didn't listen.
Tucker Carlson
Yeah, well, because we live at a time that is affirming the transgender delusion.
Michael Ohinger
What was the kind of digital afterlife of the video? How did it affect you specifically?
H
I knew that it was gonna be viral. I didn't know that I was going to go viral. My video is right now currently still sitting at like 14 million views on the TikTok page on Jubilees, my clip was the most viewed of the whole segment. I got so many hate comments, but I was expecting that. So that wasn't really what took me by surprise. It was the daily wire posting, me making sure that it ended up on certain sides of the Internet. But also I definitely more of a following on my social media. I have been invited to do multiple other shows. I was on Piers Morgan uncensored. There has been some huge things that have come out of this.
Michael Ohinger
Do you feel like all of the hate that you got, was it worth it?
H
Yes, I think yes and I think no. I think I could have gone without the death threats.
Michael Ohinger
Would you still have participated in the debate if you'd known about the prompts and the identity of Michael Knowles ahead of time?
H
I would not have participated, not with Michael, but I chose to go on Jubilee. I could have walked out. And that's something that we all have discussed with each other recently is like we probably should have walked out at a certain point when he was saying things like the eradication of trans ideology. But we all sat there and we all participated. So I think it's all dependent on what you're willing to put up with and what you're not.
Michael Ohinger
I spoke with another guest on Surrounded who feels he was misled by Jubilee and is now reflecting on whether participating was worth it.
Mehdi Hassan
I'm Mehdi Hassan. I'm a journalist. I'm the editor of Zetao, and today I'm surrounded by 20 far right conservatives.
Michael Ohinger
Mehdi is a natural fit for this kind of thing. Back when he had an MSNBC show, he was known for his tough interviews. He also literally wrote a book about debate called Win Every Argument. I began by asking him which of the previous Jubilee videos made him want to jump in the ring.
Mehdi Hassan
I watched a lot of the right wing ones. Most of the Jubilee videos are right wingers versus Woke kids or liberal students or Harris supporters. And there's only been a couple of kind of quote unquote progressives who have done it. Sam Cedar, good friend of mine at the Majority Report, did it. And Sam is the one who told me, like, it's worth doing it. Worth going into this lion's den. It's a new audience, it's a younger audience. They need to hear our arguments.
Michael Ohinger
Who approached who? How was it presented? What was the conversation like before you showed up at the studio?
Mehdi Hassan
Jubilee approached me. They pitched it as, you know, 25 Trump supporters, MAGA supporters, the name changed over time. It ended up being 25 far right conservatives, to be fair to them. That should have been a tell to me. I mean, which people self identify as far right?
Michael Ohinger
I'm for defending the traditional demographics of this country, which is majority white. This is Conor Estelle, who began his debate with Mehdi Hassan saying he didn't care if Donald Trump defied the Constitution.
Mehdi Hassan
How would Conor's America look? What would it look like?
Michael Ohinger
Well, quite frankly, I think we would deport people who shouldn't be.
Mehdi Hassan
What does the government look like?
Michael Ohinger
I would say, quite frankly, it's under a sort of benevolent leader, such as, where does he come? It could be a kind of aristocratic class. Could be someone who picks the autocrat, frankly, the people.
Tucker Carlson
I mean, we could hold a vote on it.
Mehdi Hassan
Kings, Isn't that democracy?
Michael Ohinger
Well, sure, you can have a vote.
Tucker Carlson
To get to that state and then.
Mehdi Hassan
No more votes afterwards.
Michael Ohinger
Absolutely. 100%.
Mehdi Hassan
Wow. And if that autocrat kills you and your family, you're fine with that?
Michael Ohinger
Well, I'm not. I'm not going to be a part of the group that he kills, because that's the whole thing.
Mehdi Hassan
How do you know? He starts going on about General Franco and I'm thinking, wow, this is kind of insane stuff. General Franco, who murdered many innocent people, thousands of people in the white terror. He starts quoting Carl Schmidt. Right, so you're quoting a Nazi theoretician. And then I'm thinking, whoa, where are we going here?
Michael Ohinger
I frankly don't care.
Tucker Carlson
Being called the Nazi.
Mehdi Hassan
I didn't say that. I didn't say that. I said, are you a fan of the Nazis?
Michael Ohinger
Well, they persecuted the church a little bit. I'm not a fan of that.
Mehdi Hassan
But what about the persecution of the Jews?
Michael Ohinger
Well, I mean, I certainly don't support.
Tucker Carlson
Anyone'S human dignity being assaulted. I'm a Catholic.
Mehdi Hassan
But you don't condemn Nazi persecution of the Jews.
Michael Ohinger
I think that there was a little bit of persecution.
Mehdi Hassan
We rename the show because you're a little bit more than a far right Republican.
Michael Ohinger
Hey, what can I say?
Mehdi Hassan
I think you say I'm a fascist.
Tucker Carlson
Yeah, I am.
Mehdi Hassan
Then I kind of realized that, what am I doing here? I don't debate fascists. I've had a very strong, consistent, anti fascist platform since the day I became a public figure, a broadcaster. It's easy. Clickbait. But I try and avoid climate deniers and election denies simply because I think journalists should have some attachment to reality. I'll be honest with you. If Jubilee had come to me and they didn't, but if they'd come to me and said, you'll be debating one guy who says he's a fascist and another guy who tells you to get out of the country, I'd have said, I'll pass, thanks. I'm washing my hair.
Michael Ohinger
There was one YouTube commenter who put it this way. It's never been easier to understand the rise of Nazism in 1930s Germany. And that comment got 162,000 upvotes under your video. So what do you make of this idea that there's some kind of educational or even journalistic value in platforming this stuff?
Mehdi Hassan
I get it, and it's appealing to some people, but there has to be a red line, right? What are we going to do now? Is Jubilee going to have a one Jewish person versus 20 Holocaust deniers? Like, where do we draw the line?
Michael Ohinger
Literally, a Jubilee producer told a writer at the Atlantic that they had considered that topic.
Tucker Carlson
Oh, wow.
Mehdi Hassan
I didn't know that. I was just being sarcastic. I guess this is where we are.
Michael Ohinger
Are you happy with how the video turned out?
Mehdi Hassan
That's a tricky question. Are you happy you did it? I don't know the answer to that latter question. I'm reserving judgment on that. I'm gonna wait and see. I'm not gonna be fake modest. Clearly millions of people watch that. Millions more people now follow me in Zateo. So in terms of grabbing attention, that worked. And that was one of the reasons I did it. I'm not gonna lie to you. Of course, the idea of appealing to a younger audience who probably have never heard of Zatao or me, was appealing. And clearly that worked. People are now have heard of me who have not heard of me. So that in that sense it worked. And now people can say, that's cynical, that's self serving, whatever.
Michael Ohinger
After the video came out, Connor, the self described fascist, did his own little podcast tour.
Tucker Carlson
You are in some serious trouble in your personal life over this, am I right?
Michael Ohinger
That is correct.
Tucker Carlson
What happened?
Michael Ohinger
Well, unfortunately, I lost my job as a result. And no one really is to blame for that. It's just the manner in which you're canceled for voicing any heterosexual Christian moral belief. He ran with the cancel culture story and raised nearly $40,000 on a crowdfunding site. A huge boon for a guy who to that point, like some of the other Jubilee participants, had been struggling to break through. As an aspiring right wing influencer, what do you make of the argument that any good that came of your appearance, you know, the millions of teenagers who didn't Know who you were, but now do. What do you make of the argument that that is all negated by the exposure that these aspiring right wing influencers got? These people who need to be canceled in order to get famous in their circles? Is the juice worth the squeeze here?
Mehdi Hassan
No, it's a very good question. I don't know the answer to that question. I think it's a very fair criticism and that's why I reserve judgment on the whole thing to see what the longer term fallout is than just a week of 10 million views. But more like what is the longer term fallout for some of these influences? It's a two point process. One is, should Jubilee exist? Because it already does, regardless of Mehdi Hassan.
Michael Ohinger
Yeah, yeah.
Mehdi Hassan
But if it does exist, should someone like me, who knows how to debate, go on and debate these?
Michael Ohinger
For example, in addition to the views on the actual Jubilee YouTube video, these debates have like this long afterlife as video clips. And I've often seen each side of the debate more or less declare victory with their own communities. Is there something about just the way that social media is wired, what the algorithms reward, that undermines the very idea that a side can win with a persuasive argument?
Mehdi Hassan
That's a great question. It's something I've struggled with a lot, which is you can win a debate as I have, and then see the other side clip something completely out of context to make it look like that was the moment. And people don't watch the whole hour and a half. They watch two minutes in their feed or 30 seconds in their feed. It is a problem, no doubt about it. I'm not sure what the solution is. I don't think we should stop debating issues because people can spin it the way they want. One of the reasons I did Jubilee again, and time will tell, is I would argue that most people, most normal people who watch something like that will come away going, wow, A, those guys are crazy and extreme. B, Mehdi clearly won that debate. C, we need to worry about our country.
Michael Ohinger
In your book, you respond to this idea of we're living in a post truth culture, which is a kind of resounding conclusion that many people came to after the 2016 election. But you cite some data to back up the idea that people's minds can still change after this latest election. After the dark turns we've seen in our politics since you wrote that book, do you still believe the facts can change minds?
Mehdi Hassan
Yes, but not for a lot of Americans. The debate is not whether it could change minds. The debate is how many minds, can it change? I think that audience is a shrinking audience. I have to be honest with you. I think that audience grows smaller by the day. But look, I do believe people's minds can change. Just look at the polling. Trump has just won an election, right? That's deeply depressing for someone like me. Having said that, he's also the most unpopular president at this point in his presidency in living memory. Why is that? Because people's minds have changed since the election. People have either seen him do bad stuff or have felt him do bad stuff or have accepted the argument from those of us in the media or Democrats that he is doing bad stuff. So his numbers have plummeted on the economy, on immigration, on multiple issues. So I do think that's an interesting test. What happens in the midterms and the next presidential election? If we have free and fair elections again in this country, it'll be interesting to see how many minds have been changed. It's a dwindling number for sure, but it's still a number that's worth reaching out for and persuading.
Michael Ohinger
Mehdi, thank you very much.
Mehdi Hassan
Thank you.
Michael Ohinger
Mehdi Hassan is editor in chief and CEO of Zateo.
Tucker Carlson
And now watch as flash out of.
Mehdi Hassan
And totally destroy these woke liberal students.
Michael Ohinger
Welcome to the channel, guys.
Angelo Carusone
Looks like a lot of whiny babies.
Tucker Carlson
Have a problem with what I say. So.
Michael Ohinger
So prove me wrong.
Tucker Carlson
Did you call the girls soccer team a Marxist indoctrination factory?
Michael Ohinger
That is correct.
Tucker Carlson
We actually beat the boys four to nothing.
Michael Ohinger
You know, you can whine about American oppression all you want, but you're using.
Angelo Carusone
An iPhone made by the free market.
Tucker Carlson
To complain about a system that gave it to you.
Michael Ohinger
Girls have it way easy in America, and that's just the truth.
Mehdi Hassan
One student totally poned.
Michael Ohinger
That's it for this week's show on the media is produced by Molly Rosen, Rebecca Clark Callender and Candace Wong.
Brooke Gladstone
Our technical director is Jennifer Munson with engineering from Jared Paul. Eloise Blondio is our senior producer and our executive producer is Katya Rogers. On the Media is a production of WNYC Studios. I'm Brooke Gladstone.
Michael Ohinger
And I'm Michael Oinger.
Mehdi Hassan
This is Ira Flato, host of Science Friday. For over 30 years, the science Friday.
Tucker Carlson
Team has been reporting high quality science.
Mehdi Hassan
And technology news, making science fun for curious people by covering everything from the outer reaches of space to the rapidly changing world of AI to the tiniest microbes in our bodies. Audiences trust our show because they know we're driven by a mission to inform.
Tucker Carlson
And serve listeners first and foremost with.
Mehdi Hassan
Important news they won't get anywhere else. And our sponsors benefit from that halo effect. For more information on becoming a sponsor, visit sponsorship.wnyc.org.
On the Media: Trump's Fact Eradication Program. Plus, How Jubilee is Transforming Political Debate
Released on August 8, 2025 by WNYC Studios
Introduction
In this compelling episode of the Peabody Award-winning podcast On the Media, hosts Brooke Gladstone and Michael O’Hinger delve deep into two pivotal issues shaping contemporary discourse: President Donald Trump's systematic undermining of factual integrity and the controversial transformation of political debate by the YouTube channel Jubilee. Through insightful discussions, expert interviews, and critical analysis, the episode unpacks the threats to free speech, government transparency, and the very fabric of democratic accountability.
I. Trump's Fact Eradication Program
Timestamp: 00:02 – 05:07
The episode opens with a stark examination of President Trump's aggressive campaign against factual reporting. Brooke Gladstone sets the stage by highlighting Trump's dismissal of Erica McIntyre, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was tasked with accurately reporting job numbers. This action marks a significant decline in the administration's commitment to truth, as she was removed "for accurately reporting the job numbers" (00:16).
Undermining Statistical Integrity
At 02:04, Tucker Carlson questions the reliability of numbers under Trump's leadership, referencing the president's claim that the jobs report was "rigged to make a great Republican success look less stellar" (02:04). This skepticism towards official statistics is further illustrated when Brooke explains how significant revisions to economic data, such as job numbers, often correlate with major economic disruptions like the Great Recession and the COVID pandemic (02:20).
Manipulation of Economic Data
Tucker Carlson continues to propagate misinformation by asserting implausible claims, such as cutting drug prices by "1200-1300-1400-1500%" (03:12) and reducing egg prices by "400%" (03:22). Brooke Gladstone counters these statements by pointing out their mathematical impossibility, emphasizing the administration's blatant disregard for factual accuracy (03:36).
Global Implications and Similar Trends
The discussion broadens to include international parallels, where leaders in Greece, Brazil, and Turkey have similarly targeted independent statistical agencies to manipulate public perception (07:03 – 11:17). Amy O'Hara, a research professor at Georgetown's Data Institute, explains how these actions erode trust in essential data that underpin economic and social policies, ultimately threatening democratic accountability (06:47 – 11:17).
The Weaponization of Data
President Trump's strategy is explicitly described as waging a "war on facts," utilizing both addition and subtraction as methods of misinformation. This includes the President's commission reports that cite non-existent studies to support policy changes (04:27 – 05:20). Angelo Carusone further elaborates on how the White House is making it harder to access scientific reports on critical issues like climate change, thereby diminishing public access to reliable information (05:07 – 05:36).
II. Media Matters Under Siege
Timestamp: 08:07 – 26:35
Targeting a Media Watchdog
The focus shifts to Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog group scrutinizing right-wing outlets. The organization faces unprecedented legal challenges orchestrated by a coalition of private interests and state authorities, including high-profile figures like Elon Musk.
Legal Battles and Corporate Attacks
Brooke Gladstone introduces the escalating legal assaults on Media Matters, detailing lawsuits initiated by Elon Musk following the group's critical investigations into his management of the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). Media Matters' president, Angelo Carusone, recounts how Tesla and other corporations withdrew their advertisements, resulting in significant financial losses (12:25 – 14:34).
Courtroom Struggles and Resilience
Tucker Carlson provides an inside look into the courtroom battles, highlighting significant victories where Media Matters successfully countered legal actions from state attorneys general in Texas and Missouri. Quotes like, "We'll support Media Matters because it is a free speech issue" (24:31), underscore the precarious balance the organization maintains amidst relentless pressure (15:30 – 17:06).
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Challenges
Further complicating Media Matters' situation are investigations by the FTC, which accuse the nonprofit of collusion and disrupting the marketplace. Despite these challenges, the organization’s legal team remains steadfast, arguing that the FTC lacks jurisdiction over their non-commercial activities (17:06 – 19:34).
Unexpected Allies and Future Prospects
In an unexpected twist, some conservative organizations have extended limited support to Media Matters, recognizing it as a fundamental free speech concern. Tucker Carlson observes, "Some of the bright spots have been reminders that even when it feels like so much of our culture is being transformed in the most destructive ways, there are strange bedfellows that align around the basics of what our country is supposed to be" (24:45 – 25:49). However, the financial strain remains a critical issue, with Media Matters striving to sustain its mission amidst ongoing legal battles (20:28 – 26:35).
III. How Jubilee is Transforming Political Debate
Timestamp: 26:35 – 50:17
The Rise of Sensationalist Debates
Transitioning to the second major topic, the hosts explore how Jubilee, a prominent YouTube channel, is reshaping political debate. Instead of fostering genuine dialogue, Jubilee's formats often resemble "firing squads," prioritizing sensationalism over constructive conversation (26:55 – 34:08).
Surrounded Series: A Case Study
A significant portion of the discussion centers on Jubilee’s "Surrounded" series, where influential figures are placed in the center of groups with opposing viewpoints, leading to heated and often unproductive exchanges. For instance, a debate featuring Dr. Mikhail Varshavsky ("Dr. Mike") with 20 vaccine skeptics ended with participants dismissing factual counterarguments without consideration (35:00 – 36:35). Brooke Gladstone notes, "That clip pretty much sums up the entire one and a half hour video" (36:07).
Impact on Participants and Public Perception
Participants in these debates often face severe backlash and personal consequences. Stacia Underwood, a young activist featured in a Jubilee video, reflects on the mixed outcomes: "Yes, I think yes and I think no. I think I could have gone without the death threats" (41:16). Such experiences highlight the toxic environment fostered by these debate formats, where meaningful discourse is overshadowed by hostility and vilification.
Criticism of Jubilee’s Approach
Critics argue that Jubilee manipulates debates to maximize viewership and virality, sacrificing fairness and accuracy for sensational content. Angelo Carusone of Media Matters laments, "YouTube rewards rage bait. Mostly the entire Internet rewards rage bait. That's what algorithms reward" (34:30). This strategy not only distorts public understanding but also perpetuates polarization.
Potential Solutions and the Future of Political Dialogue
Despite the growing criticism, some argue that Jubilee's approach can still reach and influence younger audiences, potentially fostering awareness and critical thinking. However, the overarching consensus among experts like Mehdi Hassan is that the detrimental effects of such sensationalist debates far outweigh any educational benefits, urging a reevaluation of how political discourse is facilitated in the digital age (45:29 – 50:17).
Conclusion
This episode of On the Media presents a critical examination of the current state of truth in political leadership and media discourse. From Trump's deliberate undermining of factual accuracy to the contentious transformation of political debates by platforms like Jubilee, the episode underscores the profound challenges facing democracy and informed public discourse today. By highlighting these issues, Brooke Gladstone and Michael O’Hinger emphasize the urgent need to defend factual integrity and foster genuine dialogue in an increasingly polarized and misinformation-driven world.
Notable Quotes
This comprehensive summary encapsulates the essence of the episode, providing a thorough understanding of the discussions on Trump's fact eradication efforts and Jubilee's impact on political debates. By highlighting key moments and notable quotes, it offers valuable insights for listeners and those seeking to grasp the critical issues addressed in the episode.