A (0:00)

Welcome to the podcast. I'm your host, Jaden Schaefer. Today on the show I'm talking about something pretty wild that just happened. Elon Musk just hosted a 45 minute all hands meeting on X and he did it for XAI and basically laid out their entire roadmap for getting data centers in space. This is something I've seen a bunch of articles that are kind of critical. They don't think this is possible. A lot of people say this is just kind of an IPO play and I think Elon's really making the case that he is going to try to do this. I think what's really interesting with this in particular is that this was an all hands meeting for the company and they publicly posted it. I think this is, I mean you wouldn't see Boeing or any of these other competitors doing this. Usually everything's, you know, has these roadmaps and there's all these NDAs and there's like these really carefully scripted keynotes. To me this was really interesting to just see, you know, the whole thing laid out and you know, the whole plan just put out to the public. So in the video I'm going to break down basically what Elon Musk's long term vision is for XAI and, and also the near term product execution. We'll talk about some of the infrastructure strategy and how X and SpaceX and Xai are all kind of tying together. This is a fascinating conversation. Before we get into all of that, I wanted to say if you want to try any of the top AI models, including all the latest from xai, like their Grok model and everything else that they're rolling out, I'd love for you to try out AI Box AI, my own startup. I let you access over 50 of the top AI models, image, audio, text. And we just dropped a brand new Tier which is 8.99. So for 8.99 you get access to over 50 of the top AI models. Basically you consolidate all of your different subscriptions into one place, you chat with them all in the same place and you don't have to go shuffling through tabs or logging into different accounts to try to find where you had a conversation, or if you want to try the latest from Anthropic or Google Gemini or whatever, it's all in one place for 8.99. So if you want to try it out, it's AI box AI. You also can vibe, code really cool tools and post them. So go check it out. I'll leave a link in the description, I think a lot of the address was kind of focused on a whole bunch of people that have recently just left xai. There was a bunch of kind of the original team members, a lot of the founders of XAI that left. This is what he said about it. He said as the company grows, especially as quickly as xai, the structure must evolve. And this was actually an ex post he put out. He said this unfortunately required parting ways with some people. I think like reorganizing inside of these companies are growing very fast is quite common. I think what was interesting to me with all of this is kind of the new structure. So X is now splitting into four primary teams. They have grok, which is the voice, you know, the LLM and the voice that goes with it and basically all the core chatbot experiences. They then have the coding system powered software generation team. So that's really kind of being like a cloud code competitor is what they're trying to build. And they actually do have a model that ranks quite well on the benchmarks for software development. It might even be number one at times. But because they don't have all the integrations and custom stuff that cloud code has, cloud code is still far, you know, as far as usage goes is way ahead. Then they have the, imagine this is the video and image generation components of xai and then they have Macro Hard. This is, I mean basically I think they're just trying to make fun of Microsoft and called it Macro Hard, but basically it's an AI initiative which they're kind of focusing on full computer task automation and then corporate scale modeling and really just trying to compete with everything that Microsoft makes and just call it Macro Hard. So anyways, this classic Elon Macro Hard is going to be led by Toby Flynn and that is I think maybe one of the most, I guess it's just a really big, a really big play. The goal is that they're not just trying to assist with workflows, they're actually trying to automate them. So yeah, in addition to perhaps making some of the software that Microsoft has and embedding AI into it, I think more likely what they're going to be doing is doing like complete automation software and tools for enterprises. It's obviously going to be a very hot thing. We see just with like N8N and Zapier and a lot of these companies that are really crushing it. There's. And more likely, you know, you see like the Comet Perplexity kind of tools or the, you know, just basically all these agents that anthropic and OpenAI are building. I think that's where they're going to be going with this. More of the agents. So who, Toby, who's leading this all up, was talking about it and he said that macroheart is able to do anything on a computer that a computer is able to do. There should be rocket engines fully designed by AI. So that is pretty crazy. I think if you look at that obviously that makes it really clear that like XAI isn't just kind of trying to chase chatbot improvements on grok. They're also targeting a lot of general purpose, kind of high leverage intelligence systems and they're also trying to get into software like operating a lot of these agents that can work on software. And personally the best tools I've seen for this so far have come out of Anthropic. It's been the one that I've been the most impressed with. But they do have, there are a number of other players, OpenAI and Microsoft and Perplexity, that are kind of all chasing this as well. So as far as growth is going right now for the whole company, X&Xai because Xai acquired X before SpaceX acquired Xai. So you know, it's, it's hard to keep, wrap your mind around all of these acquisitions that all have the letter X in them. But in any case, talking about X specifically formerly Twitter, Nikita Bear, he's X's head of product and he said that they have just crossed $1 billion in annual recurring subscription reven. I think this was a whole bunch of this was driven by holiday marketing pushes and then a lot of product expansion. There's a bunch of executives over there that said that imagine their image generator and video generator is, is generating tens of millions of videos per day and billions of images over the last month. And that's according to a bunch of their internal metrics. That is a lot of usage. I think it shows and kind of reflects a bit of a broader thing which is basically AI is no longer experimental. Right? It's pretty mainstream and we're seeing this with ChatGPT and a lot of these other players. But it is being pushed out on every platform everywhere. And a lot of people might call this AI slop and especially with GROK and their image and video generation tools. I think there's a lot of problematic things there, but it's definitely hit scale. Like there is, you know, billions of billions of images being generated. So a lot of those presentations were just kind of what's going on internally at the company. The Most interesting one that everybody is talking about is, is when it, when the whole presentation they were giving kind of came towards the end, Elon started talking about what he's been talking about forever, which is space based AI infrastructure. So he kind of just reiterated what he has said in the past, that the cheapest place to run large scale AI within a few years is going to be in orbit. Basically the benefits are that space has, you know, constant solar energy, fewer land permitting bottlenecks. Although I mean you got to still got to get your satellites approved and stuff. But apparently that's easier than land permitting on. And then there's also a path to scale compute beyond just terrestrial constraints. So SpaceX has already requested regulatory approval to build solar powered orbital data centers. I think, you know, we've seen that the administration looks like is kind of looking at this favorably and is going to grant this. I think they put out a tweet recently where they were saying, you know, they're requesting comments. If anybody has any objections, speak now or forever hold your peace. Basically and I think this is going to have their application that they put out for was like, for a million orbital data centers. So there's going to be a massive satellite constellation. Elon has floated the idea and a lot of people think this is like kind of science fiction, but I think there's a lot of real engineering that goes into this. So one of the elements that a lot of people are talking about is lunar manufacturing. So literally building like factors on the moon that can launch and develop and create these data centers. And I think one of the parts of this is that as far as like regulation goes, you have to I think deorbit your satellites every five years or have a plan for deorbiting so that we don't just have unlimited space junk. These things have to be able to basically come down. A lot of people have it where they just reenter the atmosphere, fear and burn up. And that's kind of their, you know, deorbiting plan. And I, it feels like we might have perhaps ways to capture them and bring them to the moon to get retrofitted or perhaps we're still going to let them just burn up on reentry and just keep, you know, our factory on the moon pumping out more and more solar paneled, solar panel covered space compute data centers. It's a really interesting, a really interesting thought here. But in any case, I think one thing that was said by Elon that was interesting, he said it's difficult to imagine what an intelligence of that Scale would think about perhaps. It's going to be incredibly exciting to see it happen. I think there are a lot of critics that are kind of focusing on some of the cost comparisons between ground and orbital data centers. I think they often are kind, kind of assuming static launch and economics, which is basically the entire premise is hinging on Starship here, right? If Starship is able to, you know, achieve its intended cost reductions per kilogram to orbit, then I think the business case is going to shift dramatically. But right now, because it is so expensive even for Starship to get things into orbit, this doesn't feel like a profitable business. You know, he's like, you know, it's way cheaper because there's like no land permitting and you know, we don't have to get water to cool these things and we have unlimited solar. And so those things are true. But just getting these satellites into space is expensive. But Starship has a plan to decrease their payload costs. So being able to get things into space for cheaper, they're planning on doing a lot of optimizations. And if they are able to do those optimizations, perhaps this becomes a profitable business. Today, the Falcon 9 already delivers basically the best industry pricing for getting stuff into space. Starship is trying to push that down by an order of magnitude. There are no other launch vehicles in development and right now they're targeting comparable reusability at that scale. So part of basically saving a lot of their costs is how much of their rockets can be reused. If they shoot something up and they bring it back down, you know, and that's kind of the thing that they save it. Killer of money over NASA was just that the rockets now are not exploding or crashing on reentry. They're actually able to reuse them. So how many times can they reuse them? How many parts can be reused, how much they need to be repaired? If they can bring all those costs down and just have a vehicle that goes up and down to space over and over again, that's where they start saving a lot of money. And they have a, they have a goal and a plan for that. So like theoretically it's possible, but it's not a reality today. I think there's a lot of real challenges. There's radiation hardening, there's thermal management, there's satellite manufacturing costs, there's inter satellite communications throughput. SpaceX has already shown that they can obviously mass produce and operate thousands of satellites. Right? They have the Starlink constellation, which by the way, if you didn't know, Starlink generates 80% of SpaceX's revenue, I like, they charge money to shoot things into space and that's kind of what their company was built on. But Starlink is actually the biggest revenue generator for the company right now. So obviously like they're able to do it. They can mass produce, they can, you know, mass operate thousands of satellites and they're doing a good job of that. And so turning those satellites into data centers though is kind of the next step of can they do it? And if any company can, it would appear, you know, they have the most experience they would be able to, but it's tricky. And I think the one thing they have going for them there is not a ton of competition that has obviously some insane operational experience and that's a huge moat. Not a lot of people are really competing directly. But I will say Google's project Suncatcher is focusing on there. There's a startup called Star Cloud and then even Amazon and Blue Origin are kind of showing that this orbital AI infrastructure is something that they're interested in. So there are other players that are competing, Google, Amazon and Star Cloud and so, and then of course SpaceX. So we have like four players in this. And to me that's exciting. It feels less fringe and more like there's kind of a race. And so, you know, we'll see which of these players can execute fastest and best. And I love the competition in all of this. A couple things that I wanted to say from like a technical standpoint and some of the things that are tricky in all of this. So basically early orbital deployments are more likely to focus on inference rather than full scale training, right? So these data centers up there, they're not gonna be doing full scale training, they're probably gonna be doing inference, which is just when I'm chatting with, talking to chat GPT, it has to run inference to basically give me my, my answer. And that's what they're probably going to do. So inference workloads, they can run on smaller GPU clusters and they can tolerate distributed architectures a lot more easily. Right? And so, you know, there's not like one giant data center in space. It's going to be a ton of these little tiny satellite data centers all linked together. And because they're distributed like that, you have to have unique architectures that can actually make that function. So basically that opens up some near term paths. There's like, you know, you can imagine like customer service agents, generative media workloads, AI assisted software tasks which could be computed in orbit and then Powered by continuous solar panel. That kind of stuff all makes sense. But at the end of the day, as one engineer put it, a flop is a flop and it doesn't matter where it lives. So if compute is, you know, fungible across terrestrial and orbital environments, companies like SpaceX and XAI can dynamically allocate where it's cheapest and most scalable. If they have the capacity up there in space, basically, then wherever, you know, if their servers are getting overwhelmed, their data centers are getting overwhelmed on Earth, even if perhaps it's a little bit more expensive in space, let's say, but they're overwhelmed here. They can shoot it up and use some of that, some of that compute power in space, right? So they can, they can work their system that way. And alternatively they would just have to be going with a competitor, which would be upsell and upcharging them a lot. AWS or Google and so, you know, which have to add their own margins and markup. So it probably is comparable, except they're not giving money to their competitors perhaps, and they're able to scale up faster and hopefully bring the cost down in the future. I think the advantage of this, you know, kind of vertical integration that they might be doing is kind of obvious. SpaceX obviously can control all the launches, they operate all the satellites and they now own xai. So I think with kind of having this huge combination, Elon has a really unusual ability, basically. I think, like, I don't know how to describe this, to roll out some crazy experiments, right? He has the full stack. He's got energy, compute, application, everything needed to pull this off. He, he has the pieces. It's obviously a big mission and a big opportunity, but I think he would be able to pull this off. So there's a recent co founder who just left XAI and there's like all these headlines about it, but I think if you zoom out, XAI has over a thousand people and they're continuing to hire very aggressively in Frontier AI, right? Like OpenAI and Anthropic and Google, Gemini, all these big labs. I think it's really common for the early stage builders to move on once the company kind of transitions from a scrappy lab, which XAI has been for a long time, and now they're kind of scaling up and turning into an execution machine. Like it's, it's more of a grind every, there's deadlines. We saw this with OpenAI. I mean, basically the entire founding team has left and started their own projects. I think we'll see the same thing with xai. I think a lot of the departing engineers that are leaving said that they're excited to start new projects, which is exactly what happened with OpenAI. So I don't know, a lot of people are making big deals like, oh my gosh, everyone's leaving Xai. But it's like, yeah, well that happens to OpenAI and everyone else. Like people just leave to go start their own things. I think it's basically the signs that like, the ecosystem's healthy, there's more money to be made, there's more projects to be worked on, there's more new ideas. These people are talented and I'm all for it. Like just, you know, make more competition, make more innovation. Let's, let's get the kind of talent flywheel moving. So I'm excited about that. What the long term play is for this company that they're building right now. I think Elon for many years has talked about AI, not just as a product category, but as a, he's called it like a civilizational force multiplier. I think right now we're seeing a lot of those pieces align. There's reusable heavy lift rockets, there's massive satellite manufacturing capacity, there's vertically integrated AI research. And then of course he's got a social platform for distribution, but also for data. And like, he's got data, he's got AI, he's got manufacturing. Like, he's got so many pieces. It's hard for me to think of anyone else that could pull this off to the scale that they are and have all of the pieces to this. So it's obviously a massive vision, but it's also kind of consistent with his experience and what his other companies are able to produce if he kind of merges them together. AI on Earth is already very, you know, this is massive for productivity. So perhaps putting it in space is going to remove the energy and land constraint that's limiting scaling. I mean, those are two of the biggest scale limiters. I've talked to many investors focusing on this kind of stuff and the biggest concern is like there's not enough energy for these data centers being built and that it's going to have a really negative impact. And they're like, you know, we got to do like nuclear, but nuclear takes a lot of regulation and building these nuclear facilities takes a long time. So this might be an answer. Definitely some massive engineering problems and challenges like this isn't going to be easy. But SpaceX has an awesome track record of doing what was basically seemed impossible. If you've told people when SpaceX was starting, they're going to have reusable rockets that went into space or into orbit and then came back down and were able to be reused, NASA would have, I mean, in fact, go look at all of the most famous space explorers. Engineers. When Elon was starting, they all laughed at him. And I mean, he was deeply offended. Had a chip on his shoulder. I mean, that's probably a good thing, right? It's, it's always good to feel like you have to prove something, because he did. He showed everyone that he could make something incredible. So I think whether or not a million satellite data centers arrive on the original, like Elon's original timeline, he's, he's usually optimistic with timelines. So whether he gets all a million up in time doesn't really matter. I think the direction that the industry is going is pretty clear. And he's now kind of pulled in Amazon and Google and some other big competitors to compete there. And I think COMPUTE is becoming basically the core infrastructure right now of the 21st century. Elon is betting that the next step in that and the next kind of frontier is going to be at the edge of the atmosphere. So it's going to be exciting to see. I'll definitely keep you guys up to date on everything getting developed in this space race. The new space race. Thanks so much for tuning into the podcast. If you enjoyed the episode. If you learned anything new, I would super, super appreciate it if you could leave a review wherever you get your podcast on Apple or Spotify. It helps us show out immensely and it makes my heart happy. So if you could do that, I'd appreciate it. Make sure to go check out AIBox AI and check out our brand new 899 subscription tier to get access to over 50 of the top models. I mean, you basically get everything that you want out there from the top labs and for it's 8.99amonth and yeah, it's amazing. So go check it out. I'll leave a link in the description AI box. AI Catch you guys in the next episode.