OA1273 - On June 23, 2026, eight people were sentenced in DOJ’s first so-called “Antifa” terrorism prosecution by federal judge Reed O’Connor in the Northern District of Texas to a combined 450 years in federal prison for their participation in a protest held at the Prarieland ICE detention facility on July 4th, 2025. Six of these defendants were charged with what amounted to being present at (or in the vicinity of) the protest, and one who wasn’t even there received 30 years for moving a box of First Amendment-protected publications. In this continuing coverage of one of the most unjust criminal prosecutions of the second Trump administration, Matt goes deep on the government’s case to show just how shoddy the “material support for terrorism” charges really were, and how DOJ used a few text messages, some consumer fireworks shot off on the 4th of July far from any people or property, and $4805.95 in property damage to engineer sentencing enhancements which virtually guaranteed that these protesters would receive harsher punishments than many defendants in the federal system charged with far more serious offenses. What does all of this mean for the future of dissent in the U.S., especially given the national security memo which promised heightened investigation and prosecution of “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, [ ]anti-Christianity… and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality” after the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Then in today’s footnote: An Arizona appeals court takes on one man’s truly contemptible email address.

OA 1252: “Peaceful Protestors Are Facing Decades in Prison - Inside the Prairieland Trial” (OA interview with Defense Committee member and attorney Xavier de Janon)
18 U.S.C. § 2339A (“Material support” statute)
Full docket in U.S. v. Arnold et al — CourtListener
Meet the Defendants (Prairieland Support Committee website)
First Superseding Indictment
Second Superseding Indictment
Jury Verdict
Benjamin Song — Rule 29 Motion
Maricela Rueda — Rule 29/33 Motion
Benjamin “Champagne” Song’s statement at sentencing (6/23/2026)
Defense court-documents hub
Commans v. Dunbar, Arizona Court of Appeals #CA-CV 25-0256 (2/6/2026)

Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!