
Loading summary
John Wilson
I just really get excited about these like 1% improvements.
Peter
You and I are very aligned in a lot of sort of our philosophy around growing businesses.
John Wilson
It is just so easy to overcomplicate. Like scaling a business is removing constraints.
Peter
Maturing as a leader, as a CEO is recognizing those who not how, problems.
John Wilson
A few months ago we got our call center on Avoca. And Avoca is a AI call center solution for home service companies just like me and probably just like you. They have a couple different products, but the one that we like the most is their Coach product which listens to every single phone call and runs it through a rubric to help our call takers improve. And this is a really big deal because we take hundreds, sometimes thousands of phone calls every single day. And it's just too much for our trainers and managers and leads to keep up with and effectively train. So it lets us do ride alongs on almost every single call every day. Click on the link below to go to Evoca and make sure you use the promo code owned for a special discount.
Peter
John, you own home services business, H Vac Plumbing, some other stuff I believe, and here's what you said so far this year, you've spent 1.6 million on advertising. Oh, so that's the last 12 months. 22,850 homes visited in the last 12 months, 6100H vac systems serviced, 3103 drains cleaned and 190,000 phone calls. Yeah, so that's, that's the scale that Wilson is operating at. So just to paint a picture and if you wouldn't mind giving a few minute background, you don't have to run us through the whole story, but just sort of bring us up to speed. What are you up to today? And in summary, how did you get there?
John Wilson
Yeah, it'll, I'll keep it brief, but in 2016 we bought my family's plumbing and heating company and it was eight people and a million dollars. I think even in that tweet we had a picture of the first we, the meeting that we sort of went through those numbers. It's called the State of the Wilson. So this was our ninth State of the Wilson. Yep. And I think my, I think my wife came up with that name a decade ago.
Peter
State of the Wilson.
John Wilson
State. State of the Wilson. Yep. So in that tweet there was also a picture of the very first one, which there was like six people in the room. So that was the business then. Now, obviously much, much larger scale. So we'll, we'll land at the mid to high 20 millions this year, 135, 140 team members and market leader, which, you know, I could have never said even just two or three years ago. So a lot's changed over the past few years, and we're. We've really anchored ourselves around this 100 million by 2030 target.
Peter
Okay.
John Wilson
And we're aiming at that pretty hard, which has been like, fun and exciting. That's, you know, I. That wasn't even something I would have thought was possible. I had hoped for it, but now, you know, in the past eight years, we've 25 times. So all I'm looking to do now is do a four times. Yeah. So easier. That's way easier. That's how. That's at least how I think about it.
Peter
So.
John Wilson
So it is kind of fun. Obviously, we've gone through, like, a tremendous journey, and I'm tired most days, but we still really feel like we're very early in a lot of our journey. Like, there's. We're still actively figuring stuff out that we probably should have had figured out a while ago. And I think that that's. I think that that's exciting when we solve these, like, sort of duh problems and we're solving them at the scale that we are, and it's like, well, like that. Now those, the impacts of those decisions is measured in millions.
Peter
So you're obviously in plumbing, and that was sort of the origin story. Sounds like you're in H Vac. Sounds like you're in drain cleaning, which maybe you think of that separately from plumbing. And then any other businesses. Are you doing any kind of sewer? I feel, I don't know. You've been in and out of a few things. I just want to get a picture of that.
John Wilson
Yeah, yeah. So plumbing, H vac, electrical, and then plumbing consists of underground plumbing, which is drains, and above ground plumbing, which is water heaters, faucets, toilets. Different skill sets, different sales processes, different leads, different technicians. And so we're in those. We consider those different trades. Like they have different leadership and everything. And. And then we also have water restoration. So we go, you know, it's sort of like served pro. So water damage. We find that a lot as plumbers. It's a small part of the business, but it is one of our trades.
Peter
And are you. Do you do jobs big enough there where you're. You're court, you're billing insurance companies?
John Wilson
Oh, yeah, yeah. That. It's a very different business to our core business, but it'll do about A million and a half this year, which is cool. It's almost entirely fed off of our like in house. Our plumbers walk into a home and it's a basically an added service. Hey, you're here. We're here. Because you had water damage. Do you want these folks to come out and help you clean it up? We launched that back in 2020. It's been slow moving, but it's, you know, getting some legs.
Peter
So do you have to use that like special software that the insurance companies want you to use?
John Wilson
Exactimate.
Peter
Exactimate. That's what it is.
John Wilson
Yep.
Peter
And what is that about? Because I remember we've dealt with this kind of tangentially just through the property, I'm sure.
John Wilson
Yeah, yeah.
Peter
I had a claim that I dealt with one time and I just remember looking at the software and a couple of things jumped out to me. One, it looks super complicated and hard to use.
John Wilson
Yep.
Peter
And the other thing is that the pricing was super high, like really, really high.
John Wilson
So Xactimate is basically the software for what insurance will pay for whatever the damage on the home is. So that's basically the agreed upon price. It is very complicated. I have no idea how many SKUs are in there or line items of price. I'm sure it's in the tens of thousands. It's ridiculous. So you have to hire Xactimate consultants or you. If the, you know, shops that are large enough, which we're not, you know, it's a six person team, they'll have an in house xactimate consultant. Because the water mitt is like there's a labor component component because there's a, there's an incident. Right. So we just had really heavy flooding maybe a month ago, two weeks ago. So you know, I have a foot of water in my basement. So water mitt is. I'm going to pump that water out, I'm going to remove the damaged contents, which is like furniture, you know, boxes of storage, whatever. I'm going to remove the damaged property. So that could be what, what's called a flood cut. So you know, they'll remove 18 inches of drywall so mold doesn't grab grow up the walls. And they'll remove carpet, sometimes some wood depending on how, what the state of the wood is. So there's a labor component and then there's also an equipment rental component which it takes days to dry that out. Concrete is really porous, so it's sort of like a sponge. So you know, you have a foot of water and that concrete is going to get really spongy. So you put in dehumidifiers and fans and air movers and all this stuff to basically dry the heck out of the basement. So the way that business works is you, there's a labor component so you get paid for that. And then you also essentially rent the equipment to the insurance company by the, by the day.
Peter
Yeah, we do this for our clients too, actually. When we have kind of a minor water incident, we have blowers and dryers and dehumidifiers that we rent to our clients.
John Wilson
Yeah, that makes sense. That's a good idea. But yeah, so then the way it's priced is exactimate and the billing side is really interesting because it's just like a totally different game than like our core business where like you'll send an invoice to whatever the insurance provider is and then they'll just like. And then negotiation begins. So you really, you don't actually know what you're going to get paid. You don't even know the value of the job until two weeks after you finish it, a month after you finish it. So you know, you'll go in and you'll be like, I think this is a ten thousand dollar loss. And just based off how much of equipment and you know, the rough labor, but most, most of its equipment, like 80% is equipment rental. So then you submit the invoice to insurance or through your consultant for xactimate, they haggle. So it's literally just negotiations. Like, oh, we don't like this line item.
Peter
But yeah, you coded it this way. That really should have been coded. This cheaper option. Yeah, it's like, it's like in health insurance billing or something.
John Wilson
It really is. It's like, it's so weird. It's so weird to us. Like we're, we're used to it now, but the first like year I was like, what do you mean they just are going to pay half? Like, what are you talking about? Yeah, but yeah, so exactimate is complicated. But yeah, that's the restoration business. It's a small business for us and it's basically just grown with the company.
Peter
All right. And then do you have like a septic too?
John Wilson
Yeah, so septic is a part of underground plumbing.
Peter
Okay, all right, cool.
John Wilson
Yeah, so we'll pump septics, replace them, replace drains, do pipelining. That's a fun new service addition that we just did.
Peter
Okay, awesome. And then do you have like a, like a GM of each of these trade lines or like how is it organized?
John Wilson
Yeah, org structure is complicated. It's simpler now. So we used to. These used. You know, we bought a bunch of these and then last year we combined them, which has been awesome. And so now it looks just like a. It looks like a normal pyramid org structure. Now there are decisions that we're making right now which have been really helpful. So when an organ, when an organization gets bigger and bigger, we're basically going through a reorg and I think it's going to continue to happen. We've done a few of these over the years, but this most recent one is like, how do we reduce friction and increase focus to the tune of 135 people? And like how do we do that in verticals? So it looks, yeah, it's just a pyramid org structure now. And the way it used to work was each trade had an ops manager that would handle that trade and then underneath that ops manager they would have frontline managers. So that would be a service manager, an install manager, dispatcher. And each one was dedicated to that specific trade and those team members and those customers. And some of the pain points that we experienced there were like friction. So hey, if I'm working with electric as a customer, if I'm working with electric and I have to bring in H vac or if I have to bring in plumbing for that same project, a generator would be a good example where like electrics on it and plumbing has to do the gas. It feels like I'm working with two different companies.
Peter
Okay.
John Wilson
Because the way the structure was was laid out. So we had that structure because we bought these businesses and they each came with sort of their own respective leaders. And then over the past couple months we've been unpacking that and separating them now into specialty. So hey, if your service or sales, this is your vertical, you're going to report to this director. If you're install, you're going to report to this director. And then the frontline managers are still by trade.
Peter
So the analogy in property management is we call it like departmental where everything is very individualized versus a portfolio style where you'll have a property manager who's responsible for say 10% of your whole portfolio, but they do everything for those 10 for that 10%.
John Wilson
I think what we we. So there was a couple pain points and like organization design is a. It's a fascinating and like ever changing because you'll. You build out these teams or like role or you know, whatever. And so you build out this role or multiple roles inside a company. And then where it starts could be totally different from where it lands. And for any number of reasons like it, it could be to reduce friction, it could be to like maximize impact. So you know, we have a team called sdr two person team and they have, they're now moving and you know, this sounds chaotic, but they've been really great. But they're now moving to their third vertical that they're sliding over to because each, and each one has been a tremendous impact because each time we move them to the next vertical, whatever friction they had is reduced or they're able to dive deeper into some process or the results are bigger. So it started off in marketing because it was tied to leads and then we tied it into call center and now we're sliding it over to basically our external leads team.
Peter
I've been spending a lot of time recently thinking about role design and the accountability chart concept from eos and both how to optimize our existing structure and then also thinking about, and planning for future growth and what, what are the new roles? What roles are combined, what roles are getting separated out and, and it's challenging. And I know you've talked about not over indexing on process too soon because, because it, it's inevitably going to change as the company grows. I've always appreciated your perspective on that because it's kind of like the Ying to my yang because I' process and systems guy, you, you and I a lot. How, how are you thinking about that these days? Are there any parts of your business where you're like, okay, this is gonna be kind of the same or it's going to be copy paste as we scale, so let's get the process right or do you still just do the bare minimum process with the assumption that hey, this is going to change next year anyway, so let's not overdo it.
John Wilson
So I would say it probably depends on team. I'm a maximizer. I like to, I, I just really get excited about these like 1% improvements, continuing to make 1% improvements. And like if you look at that stuff too, if you look at like the history of my career, like you can point out decisions that was like, that was a 1% improvement. And sometimes it ends up being far more than 1% but I like that stable step by step increase. So, so some, some teams you don't really want to mess with and like I don't think depends on where you're at and like you're, you know, in your growth story. But I tend to not want to go in and blow things up unless the team is really needs to be blown up. So a lot of our work over the past year or so for most of the teams has been driving process and consistency across them. Depending on the team.
Peter
Sure.
John Wilson
And the way we're thinking about it, which I, in some ways is right and in some ways is wrong. Once we get, let's say two or three of the same person, like that role really needs to be dialed in. And I think it's, I personally find it challenging to drive a ton of process through one person just because there's no. It's a single point of failure. So it's like it will fail. Like, wherever there's a single point of failure, it will fail. But like, once that becomes a team, that's when process starts to become a lot more important. There are teams now that like, accounting would be a great example. Accounting is five people and not a significant amount is going to change between accounting at, you know, mid 20 millions to accounting at 40 something million.
Peter
Yeah. Right.
John Wilson
More people, more transactions.
Peter
And honestly more, maybe more ar, but more of the same.
John Wilson
Yeah, pretty much. And like, and, and even more people. Like not that many more. Right. Like we could probably do double the volume and like add a person in accounting.
Peter
Right.
John Wilson
So accounting is really going through a process year as we try to drive down like, what does this really look like and how do we function every day to, to have, you know, perfect payroll, perfect books. So I think a lot of it's company growth and I think it's also department growth because if the department is going through, let's say a department is tripling in a year and we, I tend to think about it by department and Because I think that's easier because there's some part of your organization that is probably really stable. Like 90% of your organization is probably process driven. Otherwise you wouldn't have gotten anywhere meaningful. But you know, maybe marketing just went from one to three people. That team just tripled and now you need a lot more structure around that team in order in order for them to do their job successfully. And that's our, that's our story with accounting right now too. Where, okay, we just grew it a bunch. Took it from two or three people to five. What does that look like? What does proper execution look like? How do we scorecard it? How do we, you know, have looms to the, to the knees.
Peter
Yeah. In notion.
John Wilson
Yeah. And notion. Well, see, we, we're, we're really excited because Slack just dropped a, like a notion, like feature.
Peter
Oh.
John Wilson
Because we've used, we've used notion for years. But what I've always. I'm. I don't know why. I think just, like, simplicity is great and I think it's really hard. Every. Every little thing you add adds a new layer of something.
Peter
Couldn't agree more. Yep.
John Wilson
Yeah. And when you go to, like, the easiest way to manifest for us is how many apps are on my technician's iPads.
Peter
Correct.
John Wilson
Like, that's it. How many apps? Because that's. That's us telling our team members how complicated we want your life to be.
Peter
Right.
John Wilson
And.
Peter
Yeah. I mean, if there's ever an opportunity to reduce that number by one, even if you're giving up a little bit of functionality, that's usually the right decision in my experience. Yeah.
John Wilson
100%. Yeah. And I think we've always fought hard because it is just so easy to overcomplicate. It is like, it's unfortunately the easiest thing in the world and everybody wants to do it.
Peter
Yeah.
John Wilson
So. So you can't see how they fight it. But Slack just came out with something that we're. That's going to allow us to drop Notion. So we're really excited about that because it's basically like, we always wanted Slack to just be like our intro web, basically where you could log in and there's the homepage and here's the newsletter and here's the, like, links to whatever. And they finally dropped that feature. So we're excited. We're saying bye to Notion.
Peter
Yeah. I'll be curious to follow along with that.
John Wilson
Yeah, I think it's pages, like Slack Pages is I think what it's called.
Peter
We're Heavy Notion and Slack users here, so I'll follow that with interest. Now, are you guys still running on Eos or have you kind of outgrown that?
John Wilson
We're still running on Eos. I think we're still running on Eos. I think Eos is a good. This comes up. I don't know why, but I'm gonna. I'm gonna. I don't know why it comes up, but I'm in a few of these, like, CEO text groups in industry. Not in industry. And Eos comes up, like, once every six months. And, like, that's so true. Yeah. I'm just like, I really don't. I really don't know why. So, like, we've been on EOS since 2021 and, like, my answer is always the same. Like, look. Yeah, it. Like, it's a good thing. It helped us. Eos is a way that you communicate. It's a way that you roughly hold accountable and It's a way that you have meetings and, like, share vision and, like, those are really good things. Like, they are. But sometimes I think people are too, like, prophetic about it, where they'll. They'll just like, ah, it solves all your problems. And I'm like, no, it literally doesn't. Like, it teaches you how to talk to each other.
Peter
Yeah. It doesn't have anything to say about strategy. It has very little say to say about marketing. There's almost nothing in there about sales.
John Wilson
Yeah. So all. All that to say. I. I don't think you outgrow learning how to talk to each other.
Peter
I. I've heard some folks who are getting up to around your size or at least one CEO I'm familiar with and respect a lot. He moved from EOS to scaling up.
John Wilson
Yeah, Most. Most people move around this size. We haven't. It hasn't been a priority for us. I think broke don't fix it, basically. I. I do think, like, some of the friction that you have later on is, hey, if you're running like, 18 L10s a week, you got a lot. There's a lot going on there. And, like, is that juice worth the squeeze? Like, are you getting the real impact out of the commitment of wages and time and lost productivity from 18L10s a week? Like, you'd never hear me say that about four or five L10s, but, like, 18. I'm like, okay, like, sure, we might have lost the plot here.
Peter
All right, So I want to. I. I admire your operational chops, and I love your approach to, like, 1% improvements. You and I are very align and a lot of sort of our philosophy around growing businesses. I love. I love to dive in for a minute to talk about the phones now. The metric you gave 190,000 phone calls in the last 12 months.
John Wilson
Yeah. And, dude, that's literally just phone calls.
Peter
Right.
John Wilson
That's not emails, that's not inbounds, that's not messages like it. We would clip half a million.
Peter
Yeah. Insane.
John Wilson
So it's amazing.
Peter
So we deal with a lot of.
John Wilson
That's probably tripled the 12 months before that.
Peter
And, you know, phones are slowly dying. Right. People are moving away from phone calls, but they're still a huge part of business. And as property managers, we have incoming calls from our residents, we have incoming calls from our property owners, and we have incoming calls from our vendors. All of them need to be dealt with and handled quickly and appropriately. But I know that you guys have taken this way to the next level because I'm guessing that a lot of your new business comes from phone calls. And it's the type of thing where if they call, it goes to voicemail or it rings for a minute or two, they hang up and they call the next guy in the phone book, so to speak.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
So. And I remember being in awe of hearing you describe, like, you. You went into this department and I picture you just like tearing into everything and you're like, this is.
John Wilson
We.
Peter
We got to get this down to like seven seconds or less. Or I remember hearing you talk a little bit about this one time. I don't remember if it was like an in person conversation, but it's all.
John Wilson
I mean, so far, this is all real.
Peter
Yeah. So what did you. When did this first get on your radar and why?
John Wilson
I'll start off with. We don't feel like we have this fully figured out, which to me is exciting because I've put an insane amount of work into it. And if I haven't fully figured and I'm like, I'm relatively intelligent. I'm an average intelligence, maybe slightly above. Right. Like, and we're big. So, like, if we aren't fully dialed on this, then the people that we competed with are on like, they're not even on the ball field.
Peter
Yeah.
John Wilson
So we find that very exciting.
Peter
It's like we're in the owner's cell phone still.
John Wilson
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So we're. We think we're at like a step 4 out of 10. We don't think we're best in class. We do think we are leagues ahead of where we were, but we still think that we have a long way to go. But yeah. Tons of stuff through phone calls. And obviously that it's complicated. It is. There's a lot. There's a lot to unpack there. The volume came from us getting better at marketing. So we. You invest all this money in marketing. 1.6 million in trailing twelve months marketing. And like, for whatever reason, our industry is still driven by phone calls. In some ways, I wish it was by text. That would be easier in some ways. But the technology isn't even totally there yet. Because the industry is driven by phone calls. Not me, the industry.
Peter
Well, totally. And like, there's something about as if I put all my sort of customer hat for a minute. I'm at home, the kids, it's dinner time.
John Wilson
Right.
Peter
Suddenly water's pouring out from under my sink. Or suddenly I noticed the furnace hasn't run all day and I look at the thermostat and it's 60 degrees in the house and it's going to be below zero tonight. I am reaching for my phone.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
And not to text. I'm reaching for my phone and I'm like, I need to call somebody. There's something very primal in this moment of emergency home service where you're like, I need to get on the phone.
John Wilson
Yeah. What, what people think it's a speed. And you said, I think you said this. I'm gonna, I'm gonna quote you. This is great. Just quoting each other all day. This was years ago. So you know how, you know how impactful it was because I really, this rolls around rent free in my head. But it's, if it, if it's not important, not urgent, you send an email. If it's. And it was like email, text, phone call.
Peter
It's like a chart I have. Yeah, yeah. It's actually our, our communication style that we recommend for our team. Yeah.
John Wilson
We had a couple major pain points earlier this year and those pain points were how do we contact our unsold estimates more frequently? How do we book our membership appointments faster? How do we stay in contact with customers and let them know that we appreciate promotions? And how do we run a speed to lead process for Angie's leads? When looking around for solutions, we saw a couple great softwares on the market, but our favorite one was Hatch. So when we started using Hatch, we had just switched over from another vendor. And Hatch's user interface was so easy, it directly tied into Service Titan. It automated the workflow of five or six employees a day. We're now in contact with hundreds of additional customers. We're selling a ton of our unsold estimates and it's easier than ever to book our membership follow up appointments. So Hatch has been a really big win for us. In order to book a demo with Hatch, click the link below. I think about that all the time, like honestly twice a week. And that was like three or four years ago. But I, I think it's the same thing. Like someone is, they want to know like their, their home was just threatened, it was infiltrated by water. They don't have power. They're, they're feeling insecure because it's zero degrees tonight and I don't have heat. Like they need to know that they're taken care of, that, that I'm good to go. And a text is not very satisfying because there's a two to three minute wait, there's some back and forth and like 30 minutes later you finally have an appointment Booked. Like that works if you're like trying to estimate something, but like, if you have water coming through somewhere, like, you want to know that your family's taken care of and a phone call, you'll, it'll be done in 60 seconds. Like, you'll know. Okay, they picked up. I'm good to go.
Peter
Yep.
John Wilson
So I, I, I think it's definitely a component of that and I think it's also just how leads are driven. So the leads are driven via phone call because that's what Angie's List pushes. That's what Google pushes. It's what they all push. So as much as I would wish it would change just because our, like, our contact per CSR would be higher and our, like, we would look better, but I, I wish it would change, but it's still pretty driven by phone call.
Peter
There's, there's really something there. It's like I'm picturing, you know, there's a problem at the house. My wife tells me about it, and then five minutes later she goes, hey, did you like, what's going on with that? And I'm like, well, I texted somebody. It's like, it's just, it's not the same as like, yeah, I called them. They're, you know, we got an appointment set.
John Wilson
We're good.
Peter
Yeah, no, I texted them.
John Wilson
They didn't text me back yet. I know.
Peter
I thought you were handling this.
John Wilson
I know. Yeah, it's a good visual. It's good. So, yeah, we've been pushing texting for years and it works. We obviously, you know, I don't even know. Thousands of texts a day with our customers, but our, like, our customer activation, the vast majority is still phone call, but what you can optimize just the hell out of that, which I think has been a lot of fun. Like, hey, how do you like a project that we're working on right now, which I think is, like, I think is interesting, is we interviewed a friend of mine and he runs this like an AI call center solution called Evoca. It's all about if, if you have team members doing something, you want those team members to be doing the highest value thing.
Peter
Correct.
John Wilson
Right. Like from top to bottom of the org chart. Doesn't matter where you.
Peter
Yeah. John Matzern talks about pushing work down, like to the lowest.
John Wilson
Yeah, yeah. But like even getting the highest and.
Peter
Best use out of everybody.
John Wilson
Yeah. Even at the lowest. Like, are they being productive? And how, and how do we increase their productivity? Because if I can increase their productivity, I can increase their output. Which means, like, my investment goes further, or I could reduce, like team size or, you know, whatever it is. There's. But a project we're working on is a home service company. Let's say I get a thousand phone calls a day, which is about the number. So I get a thousand phone calls a day, and 50% of them are like, not customer calling. So not a potential lead. You have two different booking rates in home service. You have what's called a raw booking rate, and you have a booking rate. So the raw booking rate is what was the percentage of calls that I booked over my total volume of calls? So that could be. If I got a thousand phone calls and I booked 100, my raw booking rate is 10%. It's not meant to tell you much other than 90% of your calls were bullshit. So, like, maybe figure that out.
Peter
Right?
John Wilson
So, so then it's like, okay, what. What's the bullshit? You know, like, so you start unpacking that because what the net result of that is, 90% of your phone pickups are CSRs wasting their time. Not revenue generating, not revenue generating. And if we, like, unpack that even another layer, like, what's the downstream of that? That means that I have to have more CSRs. And because I have to have more on bullshit calls, I can't pay them the maximum wage that I would like. So I'm capped for the total skill level that I can bring into my organization from this one problem of like, oh, I'm getting a lot of BS phone calls. So you start to unpack this 1% change of like, how do I impact that? Because if I can reduce or steer these 90% phone calls away and I can maximize the time on phone for my CSRs, I can upskill my CSRs. I can hire better, we can pay better, and we can, like, all these amazing things. It's nirvana down there, Peter. It's. It's incredible. Yeah. So a project we've been working on is this like, right call, right CSR project. And we're trying to. We have like 300 phone numbers and we've like treed them out. So that way the calls that are the most likely to be leads skip over. Like, they go directly to CSR. So, like, hey, this phone call is a 90% chance of being a lead. It's going to get sent to this team, which has a 95% booking rate on leads. So we're going to maximize their output and we're going to try to get them to 70 booked calls a day, whereas A home service company on average might book 15 a day per CSR. So we want to four or five times that. And then the rest of the calls, like you filter them out to maybe Philippines or maybe like an AI agent handles it. Or you can use a AI receptionist, which is what we ended up doing. We're like the bulk of the phone calls by phone number. We know which one's going to give us the leads and which one won't. We're going to filter that out to an AI receptionist to then basically throw that phone call wherever it has to go. Like, hey, I'm calling in because I have a question on my bill. Great. We're going to send you over to accounting. Hey, I'm calling because I saw you had a job ad. Great. You're firing off to hr.
Peter
Okay. Bunch of questions already.
John Wilson
Yeah, well, but it, it, it's, we're still only like a few weeks into that, but that's an example of this like 1% change that will turn into millions of dollars of like gained productivity. But also like our impact by CSR will be big and they personally will win, like financially. Like they will make more money because we can now afford to pay them more money because we need less and we need better talent.
Peter
Alex Hermosi has been talking a lot about the importance of sending your best leads to your best people.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
It results in the best economic output for everybody.
John Wilson
Yep.
Peter
And that is, reminded me a little bit of that when you were talking. So the, the AI receptionist is this just like, what, what is this? I, I'm, I'm curious about that. So they call in and an AI answers with a human voice. They don't know it's an AI necessarily and like routes them to the right place.
John Wilson
Right. So I'm, I'm really passionate about us under seven second pickup. It's like two rings. Basically. I, I want to pick up in two rings because if it's faster than that, it feels weird. And if it's longer than then are they going to pick up? We have the AI for 60% of our phone numbers pick up at that 7 second and just like, hey, thanks for calling Wilson. How can we help you today? I don't actually remember what that scripting is for most of the other ones. It's how can we make you smile if it's, hey, I need to book a lead. Great. They fired over to the call center. Hey, I need questions on accounting. They fired over to accounting.
Peter
What's the name of that AI receptionist? Do you remember?
John Wilson
So it's called Avoca. It's not meant to be used this way. So if you're calling, like, they'll do it. They helped us with it. But just tell Tyson that, that you want what John did, because it's like, we had him. I had him on the show and like the podcast, like two months ago or something. And we're talking about, like, okay, what. What do the best call centers look like? Because the call center is like, like there's a. There's a lot to unpack there and it only gets more complicated. Like, we're like 30 some people inside that team. Like, it's complicated and it's complicated, but the mission is simple. We just have to book calls. So we're asking him, like, what are the. What does best in class look like? And he started describing, oh, well, the best in class, you know, they're really focused on right call, right csr, which we're really passionate about. Right tech, right job, and we have been for a decade. That's the right lead, the right opportunity, all that stuff. We have never thought about that with the call center. So that was a total unlock. I can't take credit for any part of that idea. I'm grateful, Tyson, like, share that because that then like the next two months was like, holy smokes. Yes.
Peter
How do we do it?
John Wilson
How do we do it? Yeah, because the, because the impact will be measured in the millions. Like, this is going to work and it's going to be big. So how do we do that?
Peter
I remember talking to you a couple years ago about when you first started tearing into the call center. And back then, this was long before AI was big on the scene. I remember you telling a story, something like, you go in there and you realize that like 20% of the calls are being missed and half the calls are taking like more than a minute or some horrible metrics. And then you went in, you're like, hey, what's going on? Why? What's going on? They were like, oh, we don't have the budget to hire somebody. And you're like, well, we're fixing that right now. Like, I just. You tell the story about. Yeah, the kind of initial efforts and turnaround and. Yeah, and did I get any of that right?
John Wilson
Yeah, a lot of it. And I would say that that's a common story for when you acquire a business. So if you like, scaling a business is removing constraints over and over and over and over and over. And many of those constraints are self imposed for any number of reasons. Like, it could be Potentially budget. Often it's the owner's comfort level is the constraint. Like I am not comfortable doing this next thing or like it's a big financial investment. So the way that manifests early on in like sub $5 million usually is call center because it's a non revenue producing employees that you know you don't want to hire more. And you know you'll, you'll hear these like complaints from people of like I don't have enough leads. That's always like the, the leading indicator for you probably do. And like Rich Jordan has a, has a funny story of he bought this business in like 2019 or 2020 and they had like three people and it doubled or I don't even know what in the first 12 months. And like the biggest impact thing that he did was hire a second csr. Like that was it because that was the self imposed constraint. They were already getting the phone calls, they just didn't even know it. They weren't tracking it like because a CSR can only take like 80 phone calls a day. So if you're, if you're taking on more than 80 phone calls then like that's your constraint. You're capped. And like maybe they can go superhuman answer 100, whatever. But like if you're getting 200 phone calls a day and there's one person on the phone like you have the leads to do more than double your volume. Like they're already there and now you have to remove that constraint and then the next constraint is capacity. Like you have to hire techs.
Peter
Right.
John Wilson
But yeah, no, we see that all the time because people don't want to bring on overhead which like I, I get, I'm not like immune to that. But if you bring on that overhead then you're removing that constraint. You're increasing capacity in call center which then you have to compete, increase capacity in your, in your field labor.
Peter
Yeah. And the analogy here is like leads per week for our bdm. So we call our sales people our business development manager. BDM is kind of the lingo in our industry. So we get about. So RL property management gets about 40 leads a week right now. 40 valid leads. And I believe we're probably approaching. Yeah, it's great.
John Wilson
Yeah. That feels like really good.
Peter
Marketing guy's been crushing it.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
And I believe we're approaching the limits of one bdm. So we may need to hire a second one soon. I'm actually kind of just realizing this as we're talking through it.
John Wilson
Well, and then this is where we go back to 20 minutes ago. We're like when do you start really driving process through a team? Process matters a lot with one person, matters much more when you have two or three. Because now it's like hey these, the, the measurables have to be real and we have to know, not only know the measurables, but we have to know the inputs that are going to get those measurables that we want. So how do we like codify that into what we do every day? So that's when it starts to get complicated.
Peter
So what you've been articulating over the past few minutes, this sort of theory of constraints as applied to a home services business and you know, kind of diving deep into a specific department, rooting around, figuring out what's holding them back, figuring out what mindsets are at play and sort of right sizing it and right mind setting the folks in that department and the department head. And then I picture you kind of zooming back out and then taking a broad view and then picking another department kind of zooming in on that for a while. And I remember you've told me before that like this is something only an owner can do. That the skill set of having this broad, high context, high caliber view, like HD view of the business as a whole and then thinking hard about the constraints and then diving in and bringing ideas about like driving work down and all of these things is like a very owner, the owner kind of has to own this function. And I think I mostly agree with that. I'm curious if you still have that thought process and is it still you who's doing that for Wilson and is that going to be true at 100.
John Wilson
Million I would take this back to role design and in EOS a little bit. I'm going to throw a punch or two. At eos. I obviously like what, what my days look like now are really different than even three or four years ago when we first met. I think our business was still in the 4 millions. And so what that looks like changes a lot. I still roughly agree with that. And but like my mindset probably from when I first said that, I don't remember when I said that but like I thought that a lot at 2 or 3 million and then I thought that you grew out of it for a certain amount of time and it was only until the last year or two that I really like re grabbed that and was and like it clicked a little bit deeper and I think I'm, I'm going to blame EOS a tiny bit Here. Or maybe my interpretation of eos, because I think the way, like the way they lay out roles, they talk, Brandon and I, Brandon's my president and I'm, I sit in the CEO role. And like, as you're growing a business, a lot of it is, what is the next step? And like, what is the, like, what should I be working on as the leader of this group? I'm here to tell you, most people don't know. I don't know. Like, I've gotten better at figuring it out. But a lot of my job is like, figuring out what's next. Like, what is that next change that we can drive. And hopefully the changes I drive are meaningful and worth the time investment that I'm putting in. But when Brandon and I were growing the business from like the 3,4 million dollar range to what it is now, we were looking for, like, what's the model? Like, where should my time be focused? Where can I have the biggest impact? And EOS talks a lot about visionary and integrator.
Peter
Yeah.
John Wilson
Which I think at its core is a flawed concept because, like, a visionary, like the word. And I've always been vocal that I hate the word visionary. I hate it for a number of reasons. One, I don't want to call myself that and to, like, it implies aloof, which the business owners and operators that I know that run $100 million businesses are more tied into their business than I am. Like, I feel like I have to be deeper than I am today and not visionary, aloof. So over the last, you know, we're grow, Brian and I are growing on this business and we're trying to like, discover, like, where do we fit? Like, what are the strengths that I can bring to bear? Which. The strengths you think you have at 3 million might end up being totally different than what, what your actual strengths are. And he and I really, like, struggled until probably two years ago to like, where do we fit inside the organization? We're really comfortable with it now, but that took a while because we kept trying to be like, all right, you're the operator and I'm this thing, or you're the integrator and I'm the visionary. And this book tells us we're supposed to do this. And instead of just like, hey, you know, who are we? And like, what can we bring to the table? So I think that when you're deciding on where you fit inside the CEO seat or inside the president's seat, a lot of it's going to be personally dictated by one. What are you Obsessed with, like, what are you going to watch whether or not it's inside your vertical? Like what, what are you always going to be looking at? Because you should probably head up that department if you're obsessed. Because whoever you hire, like you're just going to be button heads all day. Like just have that, have that in your vertical. Like I'm always going to look at money. Like that's it. I'm, I always will. Accounting has to be in my vertical or I'm going to piss like 10 people off every day. So like what are you obsessed with? And then I ended up gaining a, not an amazing but a strong competency for marketing and lead gen. Maybe hand it off one day. I used to think I was terrible at it. So now that that reports to me. And then after that, you know, I think the question was like, do you feel like, do you ever hand over sort of that like zoom in, fix a problem, zoom out, zoom back in? I don't think so. I think what ends up happening and we're still on this journey a little bit is how do you solve the problem and getting comfortable with this idea that hey, I'm. Our org chart is like six or seven layers deep at this point. We have supervisors, we have field team members, we have multiple levels of management. And like I have to solve problems through other people because I am just capped. Like I got, I got nothing left to give. So. And that's, that's been hard for me because I like, I am like drawn to solving the puzzle. I want to solve it. Like that's. All of this is like a game and a puzzle of like, how can I get a little bit better every day? So it's, it's challenging to not be able to, Brandon says drive a cruise ship like a jet Ski. Yeah. So I would say I still do it with a bigger emphasis on who is going to fix the problem and when I'm looking at problems. Now I'm not saying I'm perfect at this because I'm not, but really trying to nail down, hey, I'm automatically going to look at this issue and I'm going to figure out how to solve it or at least in brain start like nailing down those pieces. The call center illustration I gave earlier was a great example of like, oh, okay, 90 of our calls are let's break, let's like zoom out, zoom in. However we want to talk about that, let's get in there, let's solve it. But like that's a four month project and I have 135 other people that like rely on me to do other things every day.
Peter
Right.
John Wilson
So it's been a bigger emphasis on like, who's going to help me solve that problem? And like, where do I find the perfect human being that already knows the answer? So we. An example from recent history, not the call center, is we have this problem in H vac sales right now where our gross margin isn't what it should be. That's part. It's a multifaceted problem through like sales design material ordering, vendor relationships and install labor management. It's like kind of a big problem. And like the difference between doing it well and doing it badly is a literal million dollars a year. So like big problem worth solving. And I could never make headway on it. Like I just couldn't. Like big problem we're solving.
Peter
I've got one of those.
John Wilson
Yeah. And I just like can't get anywhere because anytime. And this isn't like, oh, John, you're too busy. It's like, no, I'm doing my actual friggin job. It's just the thing that I was ignoring was I should have hired the right who to solve that problem. Like that's just it. I should have gone out and recognized that, hey, this is a big problem we're solving. Therefore deserving a budget deserving of my attention. And my attention, instead of solving it, needs to go towards hiring the person that knows the answer that can solve it in two weeks instead of solving it in two years, which is what we did. And he literally solved it in two weeks. Like amazing. Like very literally. So it's almost aggravating that it took me a year to like get my head out of the ground.
Peter
I feel that way about. We hired a marketing guy, he started July 1st. He's killing it.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
And he's knocked out projects that have been on my list for literally years.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
Same, same thing.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
That the who, not how. You know, Great book. You get the idea just from the title. But it's worth, it's worth a read if you haven't read it. Sort of maturing as a leader, as a CEO, is recognizing those who, not how problems.
John Wilson
Yeah.
Peter
Where you're like, oh, I can see the outline of a job description in the problem that I'm looking at right now. And like trying to figure out what's the job description? What are the outputs, AKA metrics that, you know, if, if I put it on an accountability chart, what are the two or three metrics tied to this role? Then how do I Create the job description. How do I find that person? Hire them. That muscle is so useful once you get good at it. Now, not everything is a who problem. You've talked about parts of the business where you went in and did solve the problem.
John Wilson
Well, I think that's a part of, I think that's a part of this is like sometimes you are the whole. Yeah, like you are. Or what. What I've been like, really? CEOs figuring out what they're supposed to do next is funny because I think, like, nobody really talks about it, but like, guys we don't know. Like, I don't know. Like I, you know, I pick it sort of month by month or quarter by quarter, but. But because there's like infrastructure now, this, this problem is going to go away from me and the savings should be about a million dollars a year. Like, it's kind of ridiculous. Or another, another example of would be we worked on weekends, we launched weekends. We didn't, we didn't have weekends until December and we just launched them. So it's a new thing for us. And our output on weekends is 40 to 60 thousand dollars a weekend. Now that was a, that's a multi million dollar change to our organization with a relatively simple idea of like, hey, maybe we should, you know, be there when emergencies happen. Like, really big deal, skeleton crew. We staffed it, we invested in it. And that's an example of like, when you're not working on some of these problems that you shouldn't be working on. Like, you get to work on a problem like that, which is a. That ended up being. Now, I didn't execute that thing from start to finish, but I pushed and we got it off the ground and we hired and like, it was a big part of my focus. And the difference is millions.
Peter
And I think I've heard you talk about like, only the owner or only the CEO has this sort of cultural power to push through some of these larger changes. Bigger.
John Wilson
We call it moving mountains. But yeah, I think like, there are times where another way to say, like, somebody has to break something and you don't. I'm going to give somebody else credit for this quote. It was Mark from Permanent Equity, but he said managers, managers don't grow businesses, they manage businesses. And I'm like, yeah, that. Okay, that makes sense. Like the title alone tells us, right? Because they don't. Because their job is not to break it. Their job is to literally take what you built and like, be efficient and effective. But somebody has to move mountains. Somebody has to break something. Or somebody has to, like, figure it out. So last year, a lot of my work was around how do we take something from ideation to team? So, hey, I. I want an inside sales team. Great. Like, who can you hand that project to that will get it done in a way that matters? And, like, somebody could get it done. Like, you probably have somebody smart, but, like, it'll just go faster if we do it and then you hand it off to somebody who's better at managing it. The difference of the inside sales team is about $5 million of revenue this calendar year from creating that inside sales team last November. I don't take credit for that whole thing, but I moved. I broke a bunch of stuff in order to get it there. Budget has to come from absolutely nowhere in order to create these teams. I'm sure there's like, at 100 million, we'll be more strategic, we'll be more organized about it. There'll be a committee or something like that. But, like, at the stage we are currently, somebody has to kick the door down and like, fuck around and find out. So I still believe that.
Peter
Love it. Zooming all the way back up to the top of the episode. Your marketing spend is larger than the whole annual revenue for a lot of listeners, almost including myself.
John Wilson
That was just the trailing 12 months, right?
Peter
Yeah.
John Wilson
Calendar. We won't clip too, but we'll be really close.
Peter
Yeah. And I know you've. You know the classic saying with marketing is, I know at least half my budget is wasted. I just don't know which half. Yeah. You know, I'd love to shortcut some of the learnings here. What. What have you tried that didn't work? What's working? You know, where's all that money going?
John Wilson
A couple different ways to unpack this. I will. The way to start is the only thing that matters is leads. And if you can drive that into your, like, into your bones, then marketing gets easier.
Peter
What about brand value?
John Wilson
Like, the purpose of brand is leads. I'm not like, I'm. I'm not even exaggerating. Like, the benefit. If we. If we distill brand down to, like, its core concept as an investment, what we are expecting is sustainable, cheap leads, and that's it. We want people to search for us by name because we hit them at the top of the funnel. So branding, if. If marketing's this funnel and the top up by my hair is prospects. People who have never heard of us, never used us, but are potential customers.
Peter
Yeah.
John Wilson
The next by forehead is engaged prospects. They've heard of me. The next is active. Like old customers, they've used us five years ago, current customers, members, down by my chin. So if that's like the funnel of marketing, then you want to hit each section of that funnel. So my members, I want to hit them with phone calls, I want to hit them with text messages, I want to hit them with whatever to remind them, hey, you've got this annual tune up coming up. The next one's active customers, same thing. Maybe it's emails, maybe it's postcards. These are direct, right? And it actually ends up eating up like a very small portion of your budget because the lower down that funnel you go, the cheaper the leads are because you're already engaged with them. Like even the difference between a prospect, which is someone that you've has never heard of you but could be a customer, and an engaged prospect, the cost of lead is probably two times like very big difference because they already know who you are. You don't have to like build trust in the organization. Like they know you exist. So if we distill branding down, all that we're trying to do with branding is take the top two sections. People who have never heard of us and never used us and people who have heard of us but never used us, and turn those into leads easily. So it's still just leads. It's just leads because that's all that matters. So if you're thinking about a branding play, the goal needs to be leads driven and leads. Like I'm working on a sports sponsorship thing right now. I don't know if we'll actually do it, but I'm working on it two different ways you can do it. You can put a sign in the outfield, which is branding. But like what is the measurable impact? Probably not a lot. Or you can, you can go deeper, but it's just more complicated. So like, hey, I want to send emails to your ticket holders base and offer them promos for plumbing. Or I want to set up a booth every other Saturday game and drive community awareness and direct leads in person. Or I want to do scratch off tickets when they walk in with a coupon for Wilson, one free furnace. Like it's easy to cut a check for a park bench to put sponsored by Wilson, but it's complicated to go to the next step which is where the actual value is found. So when you're driving brand, the big message is like, nobody cares about your brand. The only purpose of brand is to drive cheaper leads. It's so that someone searches for you by Name and skips the entire rest of the competitive awareness funnel and buys you for $2 instead of you bidding on that same lead higher up the funnel for $80. Like, that's it, right? You want to spend, you know, a lot less money on that lead. That's. That's all it is.
Peter
And so when you're planning out your marketing and you're thinking through some of these different opportunities, I mean, how much of it are you relying on your intuition and how much is it like, you're tracking the roi, you're tracking the cost per lead by channel, you're using prior marketing exercises to inform your future spend? Because a lot of this, it's really hard to say because what they see your name and they just Google your name. They're not necessarily clicking or using the QR code or calling the special number.
John Wilson
Yeah, it's challenging. I think there's a few ways to measure brand, and the easiest is just like, literally how many times is your name Googled? And that's brand. Because all that we're trying to do with brand is people skip the discovery process where they could potentially be suited by other competitors. Just wanted to search for us because they trust us, they've heard of us. That would be how you measure, like, impact of your branded marketing. I am getting searched for, you know, a thousand times a month on Google. So you can just look that up. There's that, and then everything else is tracked to the hilt. I mean, there's a reason earlier I said we have hundreds of phone numbers. There's a reason we have hundreds of phone numbers. That's crazy. It's tracked to the. It's tracked to the hilt. Now, granted, there's obviously, like, some mix. There's some, like, some of it is fluid. There's a concept called last click. So, like, okay, they clicked on this page, which was a call button or a. A lead form or whatever, and it was on this page on our website. But, like, you really can't give credit to that page. Like, maybe the page did some work, but, like, they could have also heard about us from branding. So some of it, you have to make some assumptions, but a lot of the direct lead activity you can track. And if you can't, then, like, you should be working on, like, the software stack to get it trackable.
Peter
What's the. What's the software you're using for? I guess I'm curious about, like, your VoIP software, your call center, and is that the same thing that's creating and issuing all these different phone numbers.
John Wilson
So we put all the phone numbers through Service Titan. They have, like, that capability, and then we can pull a bunch of reporting by phone number, and then we. We're using Air Call for our voip.
Peter
Got it. And does that have, like, an integration with Service Titan in some way, or.
John Wilson
I don't even think it's an integration. I honestly think it's just, like, a call forward.
Peter
Yeah. We do something similar with Ring Central.
John Wilson
This is fun. I. It's not often that I get to get, like, super nitty gritty. Yeah. But, yeah, I think it's a good time. Like, it's a fun challenge running these things at scale.
Peter
Yeah.
John Wilson
So if you like that, check out Owned and Operated dot com. We're dropping stuff on the weekend.
Owned and Operated - Episode #146: Peter Lohmann on Home Service Branding as Lead Generation
Release Date: October 8, 2024
In Episode #146 of the Owned and Operated podcast, hosts John Wilson and Jack Carr dive deep into the intricacies of scaling a home service business with special guest Peter Lohmann. The conversation centers around effective business growth strategies, organizational structuring, process optimization, and leveraging branding for lead generation.
John Wilson opens the discussion by emphasizing the significance of incremental improvements in business operations.
“I just really get excited about these like 1% improvements.” [00:00]
Peter Lohmann echoes this sentiment, highlighting the alignment in their philosophies on business expansion.
“You and I are very aligned in a lot of sort of our philosophy around growing businesses.” [00:04]
They discuss the fundamental principle that scaling a business often involves removing constraints rather than complicating processes.
“Scaling a business is removing constraints.” [00:13] – John Wilson
John provides a snapshot of his company's impressive growth metrics over the past year:
Reflecting on the company's journey, John shares how they transitioned from a small family business with eight employees to a market leader with over 135 team members, targeting $100 million by 2030.
“We'll land at the mid to high 20 millions this year, 135, 140 team members and market leader...anchored ourselves around this 100 million by 2030 target.” [02:22]
The conversation delves into the diverse services offered by John's company, including:
John elaborates on the complexities of managing different trades, each requiring specialized leadership and unique operational processes.
“Plumbing consists of underground plumbing, which is drains, and above ground plumbing...different skill sets, different sales processes, different leads, different technicians.” [04:15]
John discusses the evolution of his company's organizational structure from trade-specific operations managers to a more streamlined pyramid structure. This shift aims to reduce friction and increase focus among team members.
“We combined them, which has been awesome...now it looks just like a normal pyramid org structure.” [11:18]
Peter draws a parallel to property management, likening the old structure to a departmental approach versus a portfolio style under a unified management system.
“The analogy in property management is we call it like departmental...versus a portfolio style.” [11:44]
A significant portion of the episode focuses on optimizing processes to enhance productivity:
Tool Usage: Transitioning from Notion to Slack Pages to streamline operations and reduce app clutter.
“We’re saying bye to Notion.” [17:36]
Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS): While John acknowledges the benefits of EOS in communication and accountability, he critiques its limitations in strategic areas like marketing and sales.
“EOS is a good way to communicate...it literally doesn't [solve all problems].” [19:19]
John emphasizes the importance of continuous 1% improvements and the delicate balance between implementing processes and maintaining flexibility.
“I like to continue making 1% improvements...avoid blowing things up unless necessary.” [14:19]
The discussion shifts to the Theory of Constraints, where John highlights the necessity of identifying and addressing bottlenecks in business operations.
“Maturing as a leader, as a CEO is recognizing those who not how problems.” [00:18]
John shares personal insights on transitioning leadership roles, focusing on leveraging individual strengths and delegating effectively.
“A lot of my job is like, figuring out what's next...what is the next step.” [42:24]
Peter and John underscore the importance of hiring the right people to solve specific problems, rather than attempting to tackle everything personally.
“Hiring the person that knows the answer that can solve it in two weeks instead of solving it in two years.” [47:17]
Handling an overwhelming volume of phone calls is a critical topic. John reveals his company's strategy to manage 190,000 phone calls annually through advanced call center solutions:
They discuss the implementation of an AI receptionist to handle routine inquiries, allowing CSRs to focus on revenue-generating activities.
“The bulk of the phone calls by phone number...they know which one's going to give us the leads and which one won't.” [33:01]
John delves into the core purpose of branding in his business strategy:
He outlines a marketing funnel strategy:
John emphasizes the importance of targeting each stage with appropriate marketing tactics to convert prospects into leads effectively.
“If you're thinking about a branding play, the goal needs to be lead-driven and leads. All that we're trying to do with branding is take the top two sections...and turn those into leads easily.” [54:03]
John discusses the challenges of measuring the ROI of branding efforts. He highlights the use of Service Titan and Air Call for tracking phone calls and integrating them with marketing metrics.
“We put all the phone numbers through Service Titan...using Air Call for our VoIP.” [59:08]
Peter inquires about the integration between VoIP software and service platforms, to which John explains the current setup relies primarily on call forwarding rather than direct integrations.
“I don't even think it's an integration. I honestly think it's just, like, a call forward.” [59:25]
Towards the end of the episode, John shares valuable leadership lessons:
Delegation Over Direct Problem-Solving: Recognizing when to delegate issues to specialized team members rather than personally handling every obstacle.
“Where are you going to hand that project to somebody who's better at managing it.” [51:24]
Strategic Hiring: Focusing on hiring individuals who can independently solve problems, thus accelerating business growth and operational efficiency.
“I just should have gone out and recognized that, hey, this is a big problem we're solving.” [48:04]
Peter and John conclude by reiterating the importance of aligning marketing strategies with lead generation goals and continuously optimizing processes to support sustainable business growth.
Episode #146 offers a comprehensive look into the strategies and thought processes behind scaling a successful home service business. From optimizing call centers with AI solutions to refining marketing approaches for effective lead generation, John Wilson and Peter Lohmann provide actionable insights for entrepreneurs aiming to elevate their businesses. Their emphasis on incremental improvements, strategic delegation, and data-driven marketing underscores the multifaceted approach required for substantial and sustainable growth.
For more detailed strategies and actionable advice on growing your home service business, visit www.ownedandoperated.com.