"Did You Hear That, James?" We Survived MSG Surveillance... with Edward Snowden's Lawyer

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Did You Hear That, James?" We Survived MSG Surveillance... with Edward Snowden's Lawyer

Pablo Torre Finds Out — The Athletic
Original Air Date: May 8, 2026

---

Episode Overview

This episode of Pablo Torre Finds Out centers on the intersection of sports fandom, surveillance technology, and civil liberties, focusing especially on Madison Square Garden (MSG) and its owner, James Dolan. Host Pablo Torre is joined by Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project—and notably, Edward Snowden's longtime attorney. Together, they discuss how MSG deploys facial recognition and surveillance techniques, the legal (and moral) boundaries at play, and what it means for fans, journalists, and privacy in a tech-driven era. The episode draws connections between the surveillance state exposed by Snowden and the very real, modern-day, almost dystopian data tactics practiced by private actors like MSG.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Introducing Ben Wizner: From Snowden's Attorney to Knicks Superfan

[03:15 – 04:53]

• Pablo Torre introduces Ben Wizner, not just as Edward Snowden’s attorney, but as a real Knicks junkie and friend. Wizner jokes about his Knicks playoff ticket obsession and the small world of sports uniting people from all backgrounds:

  "The thing about fandom...is that it is a place without class or politics, where people meet on this common terrain, often with joy, sometimes with anger, sorrow." (Ben Wizner, 05:31)

• Discusses fandom as an almost sacred communal act—contrasted with Wizner's high-stakes legal career.

2. The ACLU’s Contrarian Principles and Public Perceptions

[06:10 – 09:40]

• Pablo highlights how the ACLU’s defense of free speech cuts both left and right, sometimes representing controversial clients and often angering both political extremes.

• Wizner notes the limits of "power" for radical lawyers:

  "The power that radical lawyers have is to convince conservative federal judges that we're right. That's it." (Ben Wizner, 07:19)

• Examples: Defending NRA's free speech rights, even winning a 9-0 Supreme Court case (09:40).

3. MSG, James Dolan, and the 'Enemies List'

[10:23 – 12:58]

• Pablo and Ben reveal investigative reporting on how Dolan uses facial recognition to ban perceived enemies—including not just lawyers in litigation but anyone linked to their firms.
• Wizner admits he once "chickened out" of litigation against MSG:

  "I sued the CIA...I've been to Guantanamo...And I told Kashmir Hill she should call the Electronic Frontier Foundation...because I depend on going to the Garden 12 times a year for happiness." (Ben Wizner, 10:23)

4. Inside the Garden: Walking the Surveillance Gauntlet

[14:57 – 18:24]

• Describes the experience of entering MSG post-exposé and the now-notorious facial recognition system.

• MSG security's attitude is described as "unbothered"—almost proud of their tech, despite ethical questions.

• They spot notorious figures like Leon Black, raising questions about whether the tech targets real security threats or just Dolan’s adversaries.

• Wizner makes a crucial distinction:

  "The use case for facial recognition at the Garden is the one that's being deployed… convenience, not security. In fact, they might harm security." (Ben Wizner, 17:44)

5. Legal Boundaries: Rights of Fans vs. Rights of Owners

[18:24 – 22:49]

• MSG is operated like Dolan's house, but the public feels ownership due to its civic status.
• First Amendment protections do not apply: Private owners have the right to exclude for speech—unless there’s illegal discrimination (race, religion, etc.).
• Pablo:

  "The idea that James Dolan is targeting fans and banning them occasionally because they say, 'sell the team'—it turns out the First Amendment does not protect that." (Pablo Torre, 21:32)

6. Slippery Slope of Surveillance: From Sports Owners to the NSA

[23:57 – 31:23]

• Reporting reveals attempts to use secret surveillance and bugging in high-profile legal cases involving Dolan and associates, drawing a chilling parallel to the tactics exposed in the Harvey Weinstein case.
• Wizner describes how surveillance used to be limited by cost, but technology has made it cheap and omnipresent:

  "The most substantial privacy protection...came from cost. It was just too damn expensive to track people granularly..." (Ben Wizner, 29:20)

• Wizner references Snowden’s warning:

  "...we're sleepwalking into turnkey tyranny, that we’re building this architecture of oppression. We haven't built the legal scaffolding that's necessary to protect us..." (Ben Wizner, 31:18)

7. Modern Law, Old Tech: Courts vs. New Surveillance

[34:35 – 35:35]

• AI, geofence warrants, and mass surveillance push constitutional limits.
• Supreme Court wrestles with how the Fourth Amendment applies to technologies the Founders could never envision.

8. Culture of Surveillance Inside Madison Square Garden

[36:35 – 39:22]

• "Enemies lists," banning an autism service dog mascot (Ranger), and active surveillance of fans and staff.
• Fans, journalists, and even team employees are routinely monitored—not just by camera but by internal staff tracking and categorizing “problematic” attendees.

9. Fan Power, Legal Remedies, and Accountability

[41:00 – 46:30]

• The show quotes NY politicians expressing concern and threats of investigation into MSG’s practices.
• Legislative levers—like ending MSG tax breaks—are discussed as feasible avenues for reform.
• Sports fandom is described as a powerful, untapped force that could drive real change if mobilized:

  "Sports fans have a huge amount of untapped power to change things." (Ben Wizner, 42:04)

10. Journalists, Surveillance, and the Precariousness of Press Freedom at MSG

[42:35 – 45:20]

• Knicks beat writers operate under an assumption of constant monitoring—even jokingly calling out to “James” Dolan through the ceiling.

• Wizner draws parallels to government tracking of whistleblowers via metadata:

  "...it's trivial for them to have the metadata...It's how the government tracks down whistleblowers..." (Ben Wizner, 44:32)

• Private owners can ban journalists unless the NBA or another league body intervenes.

11. Snowden, PRISM, and the Larger Surveillance State

[49:29 – 58:44]

• Recap of the Snowden leaks and what they revealed: PRISM (tech companies compelled to hand over user data), Upstream collection (internet backbone interception), and the government’s "collect it all" mentality.

• Snowden’s legacy: real reforms only happened after public exposure, not quiet oversight.

  "Once sunlight came in, the outcomes were radically different." (Ben Wizner, 57:53)

• The enduring tension between security, freedom, and secrecy.

12. The Ongoing Battle over Mass Digital Surveillance Laws

[59:35 – 61:24]

• Section 702 of FISA, which enables mass surveillance—including on U.S. citizens—remains hotly debated. Recent Congressional votes extended its remit, though a bipartisan coalition continues to push for greater judicial oversight.

13. Investigative Journalism, Whistleblowers, and Hope for Transparency

[61:24 – 62:32]

• Investigative journalism remains critical for exposing abuses, with SecureDrop and similar tools enabling anonymous leaks—echoing the Snowden moment.
• Pablo and Ben note that almost all knowledge of post-9/11 government abuse comes via whistleblowers, not official hearings.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• Fandom & the Human Condition:

  "It's a place to…experience these emotions intensely with strangers." — Ben Wizner (05:31)

• On Legal Power:

  "The power that radical lawyers have is to convince conservative federal judges that we're right. That's it." — Ben Wizner (07:19)

• On MSG Surveillance:

  "It doesn't do much for actual security...They're for convenience. They're not for security. In fact, they might harm it." — Ben Wizner (17:44)

• On the First Amendment at MSG:

  "The First Amendment is a constraint on government, not on private individuals." — Ben Wizner (21:32)

• On Corporate Surveillance:

  "Surveillance time machine is a phrase that is just, again, great band name, haunting premise." — Pablo Torre (52:41)

• On Social Consequences:

  "Kids are growing up in a completely merciless world right now, where the dumbest thing they say...might get them kept out of college if someone digs it up years later." — Ben Wizner (56:12)

• On Transparency:

  "Almost everything we know about the government's misconduct in the post 9/11 war on terror...we know because people inside government shared it with journalists." — Ben Wizner (61:24)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• Ben Wisner Introduction / Fandom & ACLU Contrarianism — 03:15–09:40
• Surveillance at Madison Square Garden Detailed — 14:57–22:49
• Limits of First Amendment / Owner Rights — 21:32–22:49
• Facial Recognition: Who Does it Really Target? — 17:44–19:04, 23:57–28:21
• Broader Surveillance State: Snowden, PRISM, Upstream — 49:29–58:26
• Journalists/Press Freedom Restrictions at MSG — 42:35–45:20
• Political and Legal Pushback Against MSG — 41:00–42:35
• Section 702 / Ongoing Surveillance Law Debate — 59:35–61:24

---

Tone & Style

The interplay is witty, sharp, and often self-deprecating—with Torre’s investigative instincts matched by Wizner’s dry humor and unvarnished analysis. The pair pull back the curtain on both the technical and human impacts of modern surveillance, mixing gravitas with the camaraderie of fellow dads, Knicks diehards, and civil libertarians. The episode ends with a call for transparency, vigilance, and fan activism.

---

For listeners: This thorough conversation links the abstract (NSA, Fourth Amendment) and the immediate (walking into MSG, being a fan under watchful eyes)—offering insight into the collision of sports, privacy, and power in 2026.

Transcript

[A]

Welcome to Pablo Torre Finds Out. I am Pablo Torre and today we're going to find out what this sound is. The person said to me, you know us, we're always watching. Right after this ad.

[B]

ACAST powers the World's Best Podcasts Here's a show that we recommend.

[A]

Do you like being educated on things

[B]

that entertain but don't matter? Well then you need to be listening to the Podcast with Knox and Jamie Every Wednesday we put together an episode dedicated to delightful idiocy to give your brain a break from all the serious and important stuff. Whether we're deep diving a classic movie, dissecting the true meanings behind the newest slang, or dunking on our own listeners for their bad takes or cringy stories, we always approach our topics with humor and just a little bit of side eye. And we end every episode with recommendations on all the best new movies, books, TV shows or music. To find out more, just search up the Podcast with Knox and Jamie Wherever you listen to podcasts and prepare to make Wednesday your new favorite day of the week. ACAST helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere.

[A]

Acast.com what if your drive was fueled with more Like More protection for more time on the road Shelby Power Nitro plus provides more protection for longer lasting engines, so it helps keep your engine running like new for whatever drive is ahead. Shelby Power Nitro plus engine performance that lasts compared to minimum detergent gasoline with continuous use of Shelby Power Nitro plus and gasoline direct injection engines, actual effects and benefits may vary. See Shell Us More Protection for more information. I just heard something that completely shocked me, which is that 45% of girls and 32% of boys feel overwhelming stress from just being on social media and together 25% of both feel worse about their own lives. Researchers found teens who spend more than five hours a day on their phones are at double the risk for suicidal thoughts. Bottom line, teens and phones don't mix. And with a daughter myself, I am constantly worried about when she reaches an age where we'll have to have the phone talk. But here's the good news. There is a solution. A company called Gab, which has solved the problem by doing something that no one else is doing. Their approach is tech in steps. Tech in Steps works by providing safer phones and watches for kids with no social media. Tailored to every age, offering the right device at the right time. From GPS tracking enabled watches for younger kids to phones with parent enabled apps for tweens and teens, each device allows kids to more safely grow their independence. You don't have to give your kid a device that was made for an adult. Get them Gab, which keeps them socially connected without social media. And right now, you can use our code to get 60% off a kid's phone. That will make parenting easier and give you more peace of mind. That's why I am recommending Gab. Visit gab.comptfo and use code PTFO for an exclusive offer. That's Gab G, A, B, B. I do like that. Any interview with you, Ben, must begin with you handing your phone to someone

[B]

else, as I just did, and as I once did when your fellow Pulitzer Prize winner Laura Poitras.

[A]

God.

[B]

Came to my office in January of 2013 and said, Put your phone in your desk and lock it. We've got to go talk somewhere else.

[A]

I am not here to talk to you because you've, you know, represented Edward Snowden as his attorney for years now. That's not why. Also, I've been going to Knicks games with you secretly.

[B]

Why is that?

[A]

Well, it's because you got me tickets. I consider you a friend, Ben Wisner, and that is the ultimate, the ultimate reason.

[B]

You're a fellow dad, and I just wanted to get you off the couch.

[A]

And you care about the Knicks.

[B]

I'm a lifelong fan.

[A]

This team is in the Eastern Conference semifinals. You legitimately and almost surprisingly insanely care about the Knicks.

[B]

Are you talking about the attire that I wear to Knicks games? The Rasheed Wallace ball Don't lie T shirt that I wore when we went together.

[A]

It's not even so much the shirt as it was the standing up during free throws and celebrating. I mean, look, you're the guy who was defended famously, the most important whistleblower arguably in American history, and you end up being the guy who is heckling literal whistleblowers, referees on the court.

[B]

That's nicely done.

[A]

It's never occurred to you that you are both of these characters is why

[B]

you get the prizes.

[A]

So we talk a lot about whistleblowers and basketball and secrets on this show. And I think there is no one more qualified to discuss the. The collision of all of these topics then Ben Wisner, who really did have to put his cell phone away when documentarian Laura Poitras first connected him to his future client, National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden. All of this because the government itself might be listening in. But one of my favorite things about Ben is that he, like me, thinks a lot about the unique power that of sports.

[B]

The thing about fandom, and I'm gonna be a little bit sincere right now, if your show can tolerate it, is that it is a place without class or politics, where people meet on this common terrain, often with joy, sometimes with anger, sorrow. It's a place to really, you know, experience these emotions intensely with strangers. And that's why in the 1990s, I was sleeping on the sidewalk outside of Madden Square Garden to share season tickets with people. And it's why my disposable income goes to Knicks playoff tickets.

[A]

And this fact, when I first found out about it, caught me by surprise, mostly because I had only thought of Ben through the lens of his day job as the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's center for Democracy, and not through the lens of the team that is up 20 on the Sixers right now and whose players we will separate here for the purposes of this episode from Knicks owner James Dolan. But the thing that is so remarkable about the aclu, in case you're not familiar, is that it does not fear power. Ben Wisner has literally sued the CIA. The ACLU does not abide by party politics, as you will see, although Newsmax host Michael Savage may disagree. I can't take it anymore. The country has been stolen from us by these effing lawyers. It's the lawyers of the ACLU who have destroyed this nation. They're always on the side of the criminal.

[B]

Not the cop, the criminal, not the

[A]

victim, the illegal alien, not the legal citizen. The ACLU is a gangster criminal organization.

[B]

I love riffs about radical lawyers having power. The power that radical lawyers have is to convince conservative federal judges that we're right. That's it. That's it. The Supreme Court has been conservative every day of my life. I was born in 1971. That was the last year there was a liberal majority on the Supreme Court. So whatever power I have derives from my ability to convince people, most of whom were appointed by Republican presidents, that my position is right and someone else's position is wrong. Usually the government's position. If that's too much power, you're complaining about the wrong person.

[A]

In fact, the full video and transcript of that riff from Michael Savage, which went on to praise European Americans while discussing hellholes like China and India and the disloyalty of immigrants, was reposted on Truth Social by ealdonaldtrump himself. Making news about two weeks ago. Which must have been fun, I thought, for the ACLU and a certain die hard Knicks fan to see.

[B]

I don't think it was fun for all of my colleagues, particularly the one who was named in that transcript. But I will say this. When Trump was kicked off the major platforms in 2021, following January 6 and his attempt to stay in office, we were critical of the platforms. We said, he's the president. What he does is newsworthy. We're not better off if we get a sanitized version of him. We're better off if we get the real version of him. This is information we need about him to make decisions, to make decisions a few years later about whether to elect him. Trump was deplatformed from these major platforms for years, and then he rode back into office. It didn't exactly work. So, yes, I do think that on the whole, we're better off seeing the devil with his horns.

[A]

It's one of the more interesting and important parts of working for the aclu. For people who are not familiar with your work, it's that Bill O'Reilly, on the one hand, will say in 2004 that you guys are, quote, the most dangerous organization in the United States of America right now. Second next to Al Qaeda, which is an actual quote he said on his radio show. And yet you are the guys who will infuriate the left because you dare to say that freedom of speech as a principle must apply even to the people whose speech we find deep, devastating, and unconscionable on some personal level.

[B]

In 2023, we represented the National Rifle association in a First Amendment case in the US Supreme Court, which we won nine to zero, by the way. But this was not a popular position among what you might say call the progressive constituency and many of our members. But it's something that we need to do. I mean, we think these rights are indivisible. If you won't defend them for everyone, they won't exist for everyone. And we genuinely believe in freedom of conscience.

[A]

All of which is to say that your conscience has been consistent in ways that are, I think, unimpeachable. Except for one topic. You have had the Stones to go after everyone. Except for who? Ben?

[B]

Today I put some skin in the game in 2022. The great new York Times journalist, Kashmir Hill, who literally wrote the book on facial recognition. Her book is called you'd Face Belongs to Us, and I recommend it. Yes, she actually broke the story that Madison Square Garden, also Radio City Music hall, the various properties owned by Dolan, were excluding not just the lawyers who brought lawsuits against them, but every lawyer in their firm. And she called me up for comment. And this is where we get the headline, ben chickened out that's right. I sued the CIA, the nsa. I traveled to Yemen to take on the case of Anwar Al Aulaqi's family. I've been to Guantanamo. I've been to Moscow. And I told Kashmir Hill she should call the Electronic Frontier foundation because it's based in San Francisco and they're warriors fans. They would get exactly the same quote and they'd get it from someone who didn't depend on going to the garden 12 times a year for happiness. Yes, but you know, you and Noah shamed me.

[A]

Yeah, Noah Shachman, who we collaborated with on our investigation into Madison Square Garden, of course with Wired magazine three weeks ago. Now we spotlit James Dolan, who it turns out is for you until today the figure you have most feared for entirely selfish reasons.

[B]

Fear. But let's also give credit where due grudgingly respected as well. I actually think his band doesn't suck.

[A]

We'll get to JD in the straight shot.

[B]

I really do think some of those tunes are bangers. And look, I mean so much respect to him.

[A]

You are pandering for.

[B]

Hang on. For hiring the great Leon Rose.

[A]

You're the deputy legal director of the aclu.

[B]

Fourth year in a row that we're in the second round of the playoffs. The only team in the NBA. Finally a well run team. And that's why it pains me so much to be here to talk about the surveillance empire that he is constructing at fan's expense. Acast powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend.

[A]

What if you laughed all through your commute? Or if you heard the funniest story while at the gym? Well, now you can. I'm Jameela Jamil and guests on my new podcast Wrong Turns share their most mortifying and hilarious disaster stories. I'm talking people like Mae Martin, Bob the Drag Queen, Katherine Ryan, Jake Johnson, Margaret Cho Simon, Peggy Penn Badgley and so many more. So listen wherever you get your podcast.

[B]

Wrong Turns where dignity goes to die. ACAST helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere.

[A]

Acast.com hey honey, it's mom. Did you know if we switch to Verizon, we can get four phones for

[B]

$0 plus four lines for $25 a line.

[A]

Call me back. Me again. That's just $100 a month for four lines on unlimited welcome.

[B]

Plus four phones.

[A]

No trade in needed. Call me. It's Mom. America's best network. Verizon. That's the one we're talking about.

[B]

I'll send you text. America's best network based on RootMetric's best

[A]

overall mobile network performance.

[B]

US second half 2025 four new lines, an unlimited welcome and auto pay.

[A]

See verizon.com for details. Today we'll attempt a feat once thought impossible. Overcoming high interest credit card debt. It requires merely one thing thing a SOFI personal loan. With it you could save big on interest charges by consolidating into one low fixed rate monthly payment. Defy high interest debt with a SOFI personal loan. Visit sofi.com stunt to learn more. Loans originated by Sofi Bank NA member FDIC terms and conditions apply. NMLS 696891. Walking into the Garden with you and we should reveal that we did not know what was going to happen when we went to game five of the Hawks series. We saw the Thunder play the Knicks in the regular season and that was so fun.

[B]

Yeah, we got to meet Sam Presti. We got to meet Mike from Mike's Hot Honey.

[A]

Sam Presti, the president of the Thunder, who we had previously featured on this show because he had recorded a jazz rap album that had been buried, lost to the sands of time. He actually came up and acknowledged and and finally spoke to me, which had never happened before. It was surreal. And the Mike's Hot Honey guy, if you're wondering did he send me free Mike's Hot Honey, the answer is I have so much free Mike's Hot Honey in my house.

[B]

Now I'm coming over.

[A]

I am impartial in many regards, except for those who want to give me Mike's Hot Honey. But we walk in to Game 5 of the Hawks game to Madison Square Garden and it's after the thing that we had published with Noah and with Wired and it felt like a bit to walk in with Edward Snowden's attorney,

[B]

who could be a better witness if they actually did keep you out.

[A]

Pablo well, for those who are not familiar, when you walk into the Garden, right, what you see past the archways with the built in cameras which are linked up to this database built since 2018 at the Garden, which runs a facial recognition system system. Remember the guy in front of us who like recognized, he said like, are you allowed in here?

[B]

Yeah, I told you to wear a Covid mask up until the point so that we wouldn't create a scene before the entrance. But it was just that guy, that

[A]

guy was like, he double taked and was like should I not be close to you? Was kind of the vibe I was getting from him, like, should he separate himself so he can enter? And we had previously been told, you're not on the watch list. That was the finale of the episode we did with Noah. And the question was, once that episode came out, how would the Garden deal with anybody involved?

[B]

We were just waved into the fast lane where we didn't even have to go through metal detectors.

[A]

And at first I was offended, I will admit, as the guy who wants to muck rake. But the Garden security team, we are told, by the way, they're unbothered by the attention of this. They're kind of taking it as a victory lap is the word we're getting. The stuff we're talking about is stuff that we think the public should know, but they're kind of proud of, it seems. Yeah, but one of the things about walking in to the Garden is that you do get to find out who else got allowed in. And I want to actually show a photo of somebody that we spotted. This was from the Thunder game we attended. This is recently, this is in March, because we spotted this guy, this being the co founder of Apollo Global Management until he was forced out in 2021 due to his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Leon Black. Leon Black of the approximately $170 million he sent Jeffrey Epstein for what he called tax and estate planning advice. Oh, Leon Black's here.

[B]

I mean, the thing about this kind of facial recognition system is that it doesn't do much for actual security. If you were some malevolent entity that wanted to cause havoc in the Garden, you would know that they have a facial recognition system and you would send someone who could not conceivably be on it. In the same way that a terrorist organization would make sure that whoever they want to send onto a plane has pre check and probably clear. These things are. They would pay the premium. Yeah, these things are for convenience. They're not for security. In fact, they don't help security at all. They might harm it. So, no, I mean, I think that the use case for facial recognition at the Garden is the one that's being deployed.

[A]

Right. It's. It's the question of who does James Dolan want in here? Because James Dolan has the ability as a proprietor of Madison Square Garden, to have who he wants in his house. And for people who don't know about, like why all of this is doable, how a billionaire who owns a building that feels civic can simply operate it the way that he wants, despite tax breaks granted by the public, by fans, by the way, who don't necessarily know at all that they're even being watched. How is all of this. Okay. From a big picture perspective, I mean,

[B]

I think you sort of put your finger on it. You said his house. If this really were his house, if this were his home where he lived, we wouldn't object to whatever technology he wants to use to admit the people who he wants in his house and to exclude the people he doesn't want to use in his house. We don't typically need high tech surveillance to do that. We use invitations and locks and things like that. The problem here is that we all have a sense that Madison Square Garden and the Knicks don't belong to one person. He may be the owner of the team, he may be the owner of the building, but people have grown up fans of this organization since they were children. Remember the team when it belonged to others, have real identity with being there and with participating in that fandom. And so we recoil at the idea that someone, however wealthy, gets to treat this as if it is his own house.

[A]

Yes.

[B]

I mean, you pointed out things like tax breaks. There's all kinds of advantages that you get from being the steward of what I would say a public property, one

[A]

of the happiest on earth, as well as what feels like a public space.

[B]

Yeah, no, that's right. And that's why you're starting to see a fair amount of pushback. So where a lot of the activism has been, you know, this happens at music venues, too, at rock concerts. And some of our fellow advocacy organizations have started campaigns to try to get bands, for example, to pledge not to play in places that use this kind of facial recognition technology to screen their fans. And, you know, it's the usual suspects. You can get Rage against the Machine and. And others like that. I don't know that you're gonna get Taylor Swift, who may have more legitimate about her security, but I do think that. That there is a growing sense of unease among the fans and the public about this kind of technological gatekeeping.

[A]

This is where it gets really interesting to me, because what you've described is something that feels away, but legally, that feeling is not codified. Right. Like the idea that fans believe that these are civic trusts. And so the idea that we've been spied on and surveilled without our knowledge and are being kept out because we dare to exercise what feels like a protected right to free speech. The idea that James Dolan is targeting fans and banning them occasionally because they say, sell the team, it turns out the First Amendment does not protect that.

[B]

I can see, like, about half of your fans saying, like, Pablo is Making us eat our vegetables right now and learn about the First Amendment from the aclu. But let's do it. Let's do it. Okay. Yes. The First Amendment is a constraint on government, not on private individuals. You could say that James Dolan himself has a First Amendment right of association to decide who he wants to have in his building. Now, there are some limitations on that. He could not keep you out of the building because you're a Filipino American. So there are anti discrimination laws that would protect you from being excluded based on your identity, but based on your political views. No. Essentially, you have your First Amendment right against government interference, and he has his First Amendment right against government interference. And this is why people who are kicked off of Facebook or X or TikTok can complain about a lot of things, but they generally can't complain about the First Amendment. I say generally because if the government coerced a platform to remove somebody, the fact that it was the platform that did the removing would not insulate the government from First Amendment scrutiny. And similarly here, if you had the NYPD or if you had the Trump administration saying to Dolan, here are the people who should not be allowed in because of their speech criticizing the president, then I think he would have a jawboning First Amendment claim. But it wouldn't be against Dolan. It would be against the president. It would be against the nypd.

[A]

Right, Right. And I should clarify that. One of the things that we discovered in the last episode was that this is not done in concert with the nypd, Right, or the FBI. In fact, James Dolan will say, what facial recognition does is looks at you, looks at your, you know, recognizes your face and says, are you. Right?

[B]

You know, someone who's on this list?

[A]

Right. So if you're a terrorist, right, it will say, that's a terrorist. Right? The. The. And then, you know, appropriate action can be taken. It's very, very useful for security, in fact. But the NYPD told us here, Pablo Torre finds out that the cops don't send any facial recognition data or any other kind of data to the Garden. And as for the FBI, multiple MSG insiders tell Wired that there were discussions at one point about incorporating the Most wanted lists, but that basically fizzled out. And so what we're dealing with is, what does this man, James Dolan, want to do with? Again, the thing that feels to him like his house, and the thing that feels to the rest of us like also kind of ours.

[B]

It's so recursive, because the point of this activity is to insulate himself from criticism, which of course now generates our criticism. Then we'll generate more exclusions and generate more criticism. So maybe, Mr. Dolan, we could all just take a deep breath and pause. Maybe if you let up on these kinds of exclusions, people would praise you more and criticize you less.

[A]

So I just want to actually highlight a couple of examples. So then, what is happening here mechanically inside the garden that we haven't reported yet, but we've been collecting? Because one of the things, when it comes to James Dolan's enemies list, of which I am, for now, not a member, it does involve eavesdropping and it does involve the song that you are referencing before, a song that we've played previously in our coverage, certainly of James Dolan. We believed and didn't see through the lies he told us all that led

[B]

him to his endless fall.

[A]

I should have known. I should have known.

[B]

You didn't play my favorite line.

[A]

What's your favorite line?

[B]

I should have thrown myself across the track. Stopped him from these vile attacks. Yeah, it's a song about the difficulties of allyship for a man of his generation. You know, you're raised to be loyal to your male friends and then you're presented with these morally complex situations where maybe he's not acting right.

[A]

Right. What if my. What if my bro is Harvey Weinstein?

[B]

He says he didn't know, but he should have known.

[A]

And in fact, to the point of how careful is James Dolan around the discourse around him, the comments on the YouTube account for JD and the Straight shot on that song have been disabled.

[B]

I wish I'd seen them before they were disabled.

[A]

I wish I could contribute to them. But it turns out abridging our freedom of speech turns out to extend also to the comments of this video.

[B]

I can report that we're still allowed to click a thumbs up on the video, which I have personally done. One of the 218 people so far who've done so.

[A]

So this is the thing about Dolan, is that admittedly, that song is now going to be stuck in my head for the rest of the day. And it's not as bad as I thought it would be.

[B]

No, it's good.

[A]

And at the same time, this is the reason why I play it. It's because this is a lawsuit from last September. It was filed by a former guard and security staffer. And the allegation here is related to the Tennessee masseuse who also sued James Dolan in federal court in early 2024 for sex trafficking for Allegedly setting her up for an encounter with Harvey Weinstein, the subject of that song. And Dolan's lawyers, Ben, have said, quote, absolutely no merit to these claims about Dolan and the alleged encounter with Weinstein. The accuser's federal appeal was dismissed in December, although she plans to refile. MSG says that Wired's investigation is, quote, built on false, misleading and unverified allegations, including claims drawn from lawsuits filed by rapacious litigators. But now we're inside again. The personnel, the security personnel of the Garden. This is what the former Garden staffer said about John Eversole, who is the MSG security boss. He said that Eversole allegedly asked his deputy and the staffer who filed the lawsuit, quote, to find methods to secretly tape conversations over cellular phones and find the ability to eavesdrop on the complainant, slash victim, end quote. Basically, to bug Dolan's accuser.

[B]

That could be illegal. It's only an allegation in a lawsuit. But that could be a violation of the Wiretap act, and almost certainly would be if, without the consent of either party to a phone call, someone just started eavesdropping or bugging it, for sure.

[A]

The reporting suggests that Eversole allegedly directed them, quote, to go to B and H Electronics, located at 420 Ninth Avenue, New York, New York, to purchase listening and recording devices for Mr. Eversole and Mr. Dolan. And prior to leaving the office, another security staffer informed Mr. Eversole, allegedly that they needed to be wary of potential witness tampering, to which Mr. Eversole responded, quote, just get me the equipment and stop thinking. End quote. And, of course, I'm not here to have you litigate these allegations that you are not representing. But just the idea that surveillance is something that is being contemplated by sports owners in general, the genre we're describing is not surprising given your understanding of how this stuff is being deployed.

[B]

No, I mean, you probably read the New Yorker reporting about the surveillance companies that Harvey Weinstein hired to go after his critics. So this is something that the ultra wealthy are doing right now, which is when people criticize them publicly. Worse, when people litigate against them, they will hire, you know, former intelligence agents from various countries to deploy their dark arts and to find blackmail material on their accusers. This is the world we find ourselves in, right?

[A]

I mean, to quote Ronan Farrow's New Yorker story about that case, Weinstein had the agencies target or collect information on dozens of individuals and compile psychological profiles that sometimes focused on their personal or sexual histories. Weinstein monitored the progress of the investigations personally. These are within the powers of people with disposable income at this point, in ways that I was naive to, frankly, until some of the reporting landed on my laptop screen and I was like, holy. Yeah.

[B]

And I think this is a sort of distilled version of what we're seeing on a much broader scale throughout the world. I mean, it points to the fact that the most substantial privacy protection that we had in the past didn't come from law. It always came from cost. It was just too damn expensive to track people granularly. I mean, even if the police wanted to know where I was at all hours, and you see this from movies, they had to have teams of agents following me in shifts, sitting in vans with coffee, smoking cigarettes, peeing in jars,

[A]

holding, like, a giant satellite dish in their hand. Right, like, listening in.

[B]

Yeah. I mean, we're all carrying a tracker in our pocket. And so this information is available at scale, basically, to any law enforcement agency with various levels of suspicion that they need. But overall, I mean, we were talking the other night about surveillance cameras. We don't usually think about walking past a surveillance camera, and for good reason. There's 70 million of them in the US and no one's looking at the footage.

[A]

It's just being stored somewhere.

[B]

Yeah, you might collect it forensically. You know, you have the Boston Marathon bombing, and then the FBI can quickly go around to every private entity that has a camera and get their camera from the last 12 hours and use that to help identify who the bombers were. But in general, no one's really, really looking at it, reviewing it, and it's being taped over or deleted. Well, now we don't have to delete everything. It can be stored in a centralized way. It could be searched with AI tools for suspicious characteristics. The cameras can be fitted with facial recognition that can be linked to identity databases. So you're basically walking past a digital checkpoint every time you walk past one of these cameras. The cameras can be tooled with video analytics that are trained to spot suspicious individual or group behavior and then report that to actual human beings. And again, all of this will be stored forever and create a kind of surveillance time machine. So the world, the architecture of this world. This is what Snowden meant when he said in 2013, that we're sleepwalking into turnkey tyranny, that we're building this architecture of oppression. We haven't built the legal scaffolding that's necessary to protect us from the new ease of surveillance. And so essentially, Wake up.

[A]

Yeah. By the way, just the last check here. I'm getting the latest updates. An estimated 85 million surveillance cameras and counting in the United States is what the recent best estimate is.

[B]

So one for every three and a half Americans.

[A]

The question of, again, is this a story about the Knicks? Is this a story about the larger surveillance state that we are existing in without appreciating that we've been here for a while, watched. The answer, I think, is a yes, and it is. And one of the things about the idiosyncrasies of the people who have the capacity to own a private surveillance state that thousands, millions of fans will enter, it's that, yeah, the dude, he chose to be his chief security officer, who did not respond to detailed questions. This is the aforementioned John Eversole. We did get to spot him on a more public feed, which is to say that CJ McCollum at one point was doing the NBC Sports post game. And oh, look, there he is right next to Jim Dolan over his left shoulder. In case you wanted to know what his. His bearded mug looked like.

[B]

We had this moment where the curtain was pulled back during the Super Bowl. And Ring, this surveillance company runs a Super bowl ad and they're proud of it.

[A]

I thought of you when I saw that.

[B]

We're gonna help find your goddamn dog. And isn't this so cool? One post of a dog's photo in the Ring app starts outdoor cameras looking for a match search part from Ring uses AI to help families find lost dogs. Since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family. We can track it through all the various Rs. And of course, they didn't stop for a second to think about how someone sitting at home would regard this. I'm the dog. They're tracking me as I go all around here. So this thing, suddenly this thing that's protecting my house is now linked to a network of everybody else's surveillance thing and searchable by someone sitting in an office who can press the buttons. That is a very creepy feeling for everyone. So, like, we kind need these moments where people experience that tingly feeling and say, is this what I want? And we have had them. I mean, you know, Baltimore had an experiment and they contracted with a company to fly surveillance planes over the city of Baltimore for 12 hours a day with the kind of wide area high resolution cameras that were used in Afghanistan to track down roadside bombers. And this was recorded 12 hours a day and fed into a database so that it could be rewound by the police every time there was a crime and people freaked out. And we sued over this. We ultimately won under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. But it was 8 to 7.

[A]

Right.

[B]

This was a close Fourth Amendment case about whether the government could, without any suspicion, just go up there and collect all this information. But an eye in the sky. I think people do have that visceral reaction to, in a way that they don't when that eye is in their pocket.

[A]

I love and am horrified that we're actively experimenting with what did the founders envision? What did the framers of the Constitution envision when it came to, should this protect something like what you just described, which they could not have imagined?

[B]

There's a case in the Supreme Court last month where the court is deciding whether the police can get something called a geofence warrant. A crime happened here. We don't have suspicion of any person. Could we go to Google or a phone company and get information about every person who was in that area during a certain period of time? I mean, to me, this is what the founders would have understood as a general warrant. The Fourth Amendment was written so that the king couldn't take all the mail and read it and find the person who was disloyal to the King. That's what this is. Let's take everybody's identity and then sift through it until we find the bad one, and we'll see what the Supreme Court has to say about this. I think the court has not been so predictable in these cases. And partly that's because the justices themselves carry these phones. And so they feel skid in the game in a way that maybe they didn't during the drug war because they don't ride Greyhound buses with duffel bags of marijuana in them. Right. But they definitely do have phones. And so that's why we've won some pretty landmark cases, even from this conservative court on digital privacy.

[A]

But you're describing the recurring phenomenon of something really does need to hit home.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

For the justices, for fans, for this stuff to actually matter have consequences. And so, by the way, on that note that you mentioned about the dogs Rings founder has since made an apology tour. Everyone's acknowledged, oh, my God, we spent so much money to get the biggest possible audience for a thing that blew up in our own faces. And of course, the question of pets brings me back to the garden. I believe that one of the more overlooked aspects of our collaboration with Wired is that MSG security boss John Eversole, according to his own Facebook photos that was found is a cat person or at least a cat with hot pink paw covers on a handgun person. And also that his boss Nixon Rangers owner James Dolan has such quote disdain for dogs according to a sworn affirmation by a former VP of MSG Security in a civil lawsuit against Eversole and Dolan's company that Eversole allegedly kept canine bomb sniffing dogs away from Dolan when he was walking around the garden. Which brings us now to all time Rangers great Adam Graves in this team video from 2018. In my current role with the Blue Shirts, I help out on the hockey side and I'm lucky enough to be a part of all of our community programs with a smile on my face. I have the joy of introducing you to a new member of our Rangers town community. Rangers Ranger Ranger is going to be training with the organization to become a professional service dog in partnership for those who cannot see Ranger. How would you describe visually Ranger the

[B]

dog I'm seeing an adorable golden laboratory puppy with a harness.

[A]

Ranger was a thing on social media. Ranger went kind of viral at the time. This was 2018, 2019. Ranger was photographed with players was on the Jumbotron had the description team's best friend. And if you are now wondering how the team's best friend could have coexisted with the team's owner, good question. Because as one former Garden official put it, there was definitely an effort to keep the dog away from James Dolan. Ranger would often stay beneath the desk of his handler in the office. According to our MSG sources, however, there was a tipping point, which is when a bunch of the models who often sit in the vicinity of Dolonik games saw this adorable Labrador and started asking if they could bring their dogs. Now, MSG did not respond to our request for comment here, but former high ranking Garden executives recall that right before they were gonna introduce Ranger in person at a game, the team's unofficial dog mascot, as one put it, was abruptly canceled. Dolan, in other words, had effectively banished an autism service puppy from the arena in addition to his human enemies. As one former high level Garden employee put it, quote, remember how the Brady Bunch had a dog that just disappeared because the dog got killed in real life, that's sort of what happened to Ranger. He just disappeared. End quote.

[B]

Now Ranger is on a farm living his best life.

[A]

Well actually the following summer Ranger the Yellow Lab did find his quote forever home. He was sent up to be a companion dog to a 16 year old with autism. This is documented on NHL.com and he stopped appearing anywhere near James Dolan stopped showing up at the Garden in general.

[B]

Yeah. I think the risk here is that we treat this as one kind of oddball, as idiosyncrasies. And it's kind of funny. Hey, I'm not a lawyer who works for a law firm that sued the Garden. Did you hear what he did? But on the other hand, your reporting goes a lot beyond that. I mean, the fact that they have people during the game communicating with each other about the fans chants, going to those sections, taking pictures, doing profiles, and then sitting around and deciding, is this person red, yellow or green? Essentially, should we just keep an eye on the person when she's here, or should we keep her out altogether? Now we're getting closer to the ring creepiness. That's where I think every fan should have that tingly feeling and say, is this how we want life to feel? The security technologist Bruce Schneier has this great line. He says, think about how you feel when a police car is driving right alongside you. And now imagine feeling that way all the time. And that's the reality of these systems that are putting different kinds of recording devices, different kinds of identity trackers, sort of surrounding us again with this invisible architecture. Now, we don't live in a repressive society like Western China where a whole population is being kept down using these technologies, but the technologies are the same. And how secure do you feel when a, you know, dog hating multi billionaire is able to use those technologies to basically control something as civic and collective as our sports fandom?

[A]

And so we have Zoram Hamdani, the mayor of the city, calling our investigation, quote, a point of immense concern that is, quote, deeply troubling and that his office will, quote, look into. We're also talking about New York Attorney General Letitia James, who tells us here Pablatore finds out in an exclusive statement this week, quote, my office is closely reviewing the latest reporting on Madison Square Garden surveillance tactics, end quote. Joining that chorus is Brad Lander, who is the former city council member, the Democrat who ran for mayor last year, currently running for US Congress, who tells us, quote, while the Knicks battle for a championship while Harry Styles and Billy Joel play to sold out crowds, James Dolan is running a private surveillance network at MSG to track, intimidate and silence anyone he considers an enemy. What's even more, Orwellian, New Yorkers are subsidizing this billionaire bully and his tech toys with a huge property tax break passed by state legislature in 1982. If they can't stop, Dolan from spying on U.S. governor Hochul and the state legislature should at least end his sweetheart deal for Albany. End quote.

[B]

If you could find a way to mobilize that constituency around any issue, it would be an incredibly powerful. You wouldn't even say special interest, because it cuts across so many different kinds of identities and ideologies. And so I do think I'm delighted to come onto this show to talk about this and not a show that's about politics or just aimed at a political audience, because I think that sports fans have a huge amount of untapped power to change things.

[A]

The feeling of, what's it like when you know you're being watched? And in fact, they want you to know you're being watched. It brings us to, frankly, the population that is most acutely experienced that at the Garden, which has been current and former Knicks beat writers. You know, speaking of the ring cam and speaking of having, you know, these eyes and ears in the sky, there is a working assumption in the media room where these reporters file their stories that it might be bugged and that there's the running joke of, you know, when they're criticizing a roster move, something the team did, they point up at the ceiling and say, did you hear that, James? You know, and it's kind of a joke. It's kind of not.

[B]

I think all the fans are doing that now.

[A]

What? One Knicks writer said to us, and they asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution, they told us this story. So a few years back, I had a report, and I get a call from somebody with the Knicks shortly after that, and know your sources. And I'm like, I don't play guess the source. And the person says, no, I know this is your source. And I just say, where's this coming from? Why are you so certain on this? The person says, I know you had a conversation with this executive. I said, when? And they said, at msg this time, that hits me what the conversation was. I said, do you know what that conversation was? I was just offering condolences on the death in his family. And the person said to me, well, would you have offered condolences to that person if he wasn't your source? I said, yes, that's what being a human being is. I said, how did you know that? I spoke to that person. There was nobody around. And the person said to me, you know us, we're always watching these reporters, by the way, when active conversation is like, should we log into the Garden's WI fi? Because they fear all of that data being Accessible by the people trying to know everything they can about who they're talking to.

[B]

I mean, if the someone works for the Garden is using any kind of device supplied by the NICs, then it's trivial for them to have the metadata. The metadata, meaning the information about who you call when and for how long. It's how the government tracks down whistleblowers is by using that kind of metadata. And it's why they have been trying to get journalists metadata so they can find out who their sources are for various stories.

[A]

It brings us back to that thing about speech of like, journalists, First Amendment seems obvious. You should be able to criticize and report however you see fit. When you walk into the Garden, it speaks to, again, this sort of like unwritten detente in which billionaires tolerate journalists, because that has been custom. But legally, do they have to?

[B]

No, they really don't. I mean, the league has some leverage if it wants to use it. And so the NBA could say, you have to let journalists in or. And then they have a bunch of coercive measures that they could take as with anything else, if they chose to. Of course, the NBA is made up of its owners, and if the owners all want to have these rules where they can kick journalists out, then they are able to do it. On the other hand, when the White House says to the apartment, you can't come into the building unless you call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America, the AP can go to court and say, no, actually, we have a First Amendment right. If you're going to open up the White House to journalists, you can't keep us out on the basis of our speech or our viewpoints. And they can get a victory in that case. And so that's the difference here. The law gives private owners a huge amount of leeway. Now, again, there are other levers. If you're a city council person who's watching this, if you're a mayor who happens to be a fan of Pablo, or if you're in the state legislature, think, does the Garden. Do the Knicks belong solely to James Dolan?

[A]

Men's Wearhouse helps you love the way you look, no matter if it's a formal occasion or a more casual thing. Job interview, tea time, high school reunion, wedding, courtside seats, or just a neighborhood party where you want people to say, man, that dude looks impressive. So if you're a man with literally anything on the books, Men's Wearhouse has everything you need, from formal to casual, dressed up to dress down. And the best part is they pride themselves on impeccable service from the moment you walk in the door. With in store experts well versed in finding you the right look for any occasion and on site tailors to make sure the fit is perfect for your body, Men's Wearhouse really has it all. Suits, tuxes, sport coats, jeans, shorts, chinos, T shirts, polos, loafers, sneakers, sandals. All of it. Get ready to look and feel good from head to toe by visiting Men's Wearhouse today and with over 600 locations nationwide, they are nearby when you're ready to love the way you look. Men's Wearhouse Love the way you look if you've ever tried to keep up with the world of wellness and performance, you know that it moves really fast. New products, new ingredients and new claims all competing for your attention. And that's why the Drop by GNC exists. It's where new happens first and where GNC cuts through the noise to find out what actually works. No guesswork, no endless scrolling, just a curated selection of the best from the latest launches and trends and innovations in wellness and performance, all handpicked by GNC's experts. And here's the advantage. You're getting a sneak peek at what's coming next, the newest formulas, the latest flavors, and the up and coming brands before they hit the mainstream. From trending ingredients to breakthrough formulas, the Drop by GNC keeps you informed and focused and on top of your goals. And with new Drops launching regularly, there's always something fresh to discover. So if you're ready to stop chasing trends and start staying ahead of them, check out the Drop by GNC today. GNC.com the drop is the destination to discover something new to try today and get the facts you can trust on what's new and trending. And make sure to plan what's next by browsing the Coming soon calendar of drops. That's gnc.com the drop.

[B]

Acast powers the world's best podcasts. Here's the show that we recommend.

[A]

Do you like being educated on things

[B]

that entertain but don't matter? Well, then you need to be listening to the podcast with Knox and Jamie. Every Wednesday we put together an episode dedicated to delightful idiocy to give your brain a break from all the serious and important stuff. Whether we're deep diving a classic movie, dissecting the true meanings behind the newest slang, or dunking on our own listeners for their bad takes or cringy stories, we always approach our topics with humor and just a little bit of side eye. And we end every episode with recommendations on all the best new movies, books, TV shows or music. To find out more, just search up the podcast with Knox and Jamie. Wherever you listen to podcasts and prepare to make Wednesday your new favorite day of the week, ACAST helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere.

[A]

Acast.com. This is where we make this first take for a second the Mount Rushmore of whistleblowers. You know, Daniel Ellsberg, the Pentagon Papers, they're it's up there. But Snowden is as impactful, arguably the most impactful whistleblower of all time.

[B]

Daniel Ellsberg thought that Snowden was a lot more impactful than he was. Ellsberg famously regretted that he waited years too long before blowing the whistle on the lies that got us into the Vietnam War. In his view, Snowden was a much more consequential whistleblower than he was the goat breaking details on that whistleblower who leaked top secret documents about the government surveillance of Americans. Edward Snowden revealed his identity to the Guardian and he knows he's a hunted man. Right now he's trying to find a country that will give him asylum from prosecution.

[A]

I, sitting at my desk certainly had

[B]

the authorities to wiretap anyone, from you

[A]

or your accountant to a federal judge, to even the president, if I had a personal email. And so look, with all due apologies to Deep Throat, to Mark Felt, everyone else on the list, I do want to show a slide from a PowerPoint presentation because Pablo Torre finds out, loves PowerPoint presentations. It turns out this was originally published by the Guardian. It was June 2013, you know, forever ago. Could you help us describe, Ben, what we're seeing in this slide?

[B]

So this was one of the first disclosures that was published in June of 2013. It describes a program called Prism. And this was the mechanism by which the NSA essentially cooperated with the world's major communications and technology companies. This was not the most controversial by any means. This essentially described a program where the NSA would knock on the front door of these companies and say, pursuant to this authority, you need to turn over customer data. Now, it was very embarrassing for these companies, who were global companies, to be seen as the arm of the NSA in this way. But what the companies would later learn is that even as the NSA was knocking on the front door, it was breaking into the back door. And there are other slides where they show the data centers that connect each other and circle the one place where data passed unencrypted and where they were siphoning it off and stealing it which is why many of these big technology companies, at least temporarily, were radicalized against what the NSA was doing.

[A]

And I want to list the ones the current providers here. It's Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Pal Talk, YouTube, Skype, AOL, Apple. And that arrow just points in the direction of, by the way, you know, email, chat, video, voice, videos, photo store, data, voiceover, IP file transfers, video conference.

[B]

There's a famous slide from the Snowden Archive that has the motto collect it all. And collect it all was the motto of General Keith Alexander, who was the director of the NSA at the time. And really his goal was, we are going to build the technology to collect and store the world's communications. The legal authorities will leave to someone else. We'll work that out later. It's easier to ask forgiveness than permission. So let's just collect it all. We'll build massive data centers, the original data centers before it was all AI, and just build this surveillance time machine and store it.

[A]

Surveillance time machine is a phrase that is just, again, great band name, haunting premise. Yeah. And then there's another slide which we should look at.

[B]

These are different mechanisms. So PRISM is the mechanism for going to the technology companies and demanding user data. Upstream is something more comprehensive where the NSA puts interception equipment onto the actual central arteries of the Internet, onto the backbone of the Internet, and makes a copy of everything that passes through. And so everything that passes in and out of the United States through these fiber optic cables is copied through upstream and then searched for a series of search terms that are never approved by any judge. And if there's a hit, if information that's passing through matches one of those search terms, then that information is redirected and stored in the NSA server. So upstream really is collected.

[A]

All right, so there's upstream at the top of this, there's PRISM on the bottom, and in, in yellow, in a circle right to the left hand side, it just says in bold, you should use both. And it points to Upstream and to prism. In the spirit of. Yeah, we want everything. Yeah, because of course, I guess, of course the government want everything. I mean, there is a scene and I just watched. I rewatched Citizen 4 recently and it's for those who don't know, it's a documentary by Laura Poitras, who won the Academy Award for this, the best documentary. And this is the scene inside the hotel room in Hong Kong where she and Glenn Greenwald and Ewan McCaskill from the Guardian are reporting this story. And Edward Snowden, the aforementioned NSA whistleblower, hangs up the phone. Okay, great. Thank you so much. Have a good one. Bye. Fix that real quick. So another fun thing. I was telling Laura about this. All of these new VoIP phones, they have little computers in them and you can hot mic these over the network all the time, even when the receiver's down. So as long as it's plugged in, it can be listening.

[B]

And I hadn't even considered that earlier, but yeah, okay.

[A]

There are so many ways this could be. Everything that's in here is pretty much going to be on the public record at some point. We should operate on that. The reason why your phone was taken when you show up in the movie, by the way, the reason why he is, I was about to say paranoid, but I think he's actually just aware.

[B]

What did Joseph Heller say in catch 22? Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not coming after you. But he's saying, in general, unless you're using the most pristine security protocols, you can never assume that you're unwatched by a very well resourced adversary.

[A]

And so I do have permanent record. Which is the book you worked on with Snowden. It's a bestseller.

[B]

Another one we should recommend.

[A]

Absolutely. In part, because what you. You hear from him again, Ed Snowden, you know, he's 30 years old that summer, he's born 83, I was born in 85. What he articulates in this book, which is so again activating for me as a matter of like, should I think along these lines as well, is that he remembers the promise of Internet connectivity. The promise of an Internet in which it was meant to be a place where you could speak and share thoughts and not feel like you were being actually watched and surveilled and having all of that information you dared to share used against you in some regard. And that was like a nostalgia that I had frankly forgotten until I revisited. Oh, wait a minute, we did used to believe that in the book.

[B]

Yeah. He talks about how clunky and individualistic all the websites were because they were made by hobbyists and how even anonymity wasn't used for abuse. It was used, in a way, for people just to try on different identities without having to be so permanent record is this very chilling title for it. In a world where nothing is deleted, and not just nothing, but no version of your prior self is deleted. In my childhood, the worst things that I ever said and did were observed or observable, if by anyone, only by the people immediately around me. And almost all of them were Surely forgotten by now, but kids are growing up in a completely merciless world right now, where the dumbest thing they say they probably said on a social network, and it might get them kept out of college if someone digs it up years later.

[A]

I say all of this to point out that this podcast, this episode, is not intended to be a radical leftist terrorist plot to take down Madison Square Garden. In fact, for those who are not familiar with the timeline when Edward Snowden was becoming the foremost whistleblower in American history, the president then was who was Barack Obama.

[B]

And Barack Obama came forward when Snowden first emerged and said to the American people, nothing to worry about here. And the reason that's not how it

[A]

works is because we've got congressional oversight and judicial oversight.

[B]

And if people can't trust not only

[A]

the executive branch, but also don't trust

[B]

Congress and don't trust federal judges to make sure that we're abiding by the Constitution, due process, and rule of law,

[A]

then we're going to have some problems here.

[B]

Now, that ended up being not a defense, but an indictment. Because, of course, once the public was brought in to the conversation, all three branches of government reversed course. The courts that had approved things in secret struck them down in public. The Congress that had rubber stamped or ignored passed a law to restrict rather than expand intelligence surveillance authority. Even the executive branch itself instituted a bunch of unilateral reforms that Obama had to appoint an expert panel. So again, once sunlight came in, the outcomes were radically different.

[A]

And look, as a matter of who should we be concerned about? I think what you're describing here, frankly, are the incentives of an apparatus as opposed to any individual.

[B]

Absolutely right. And in some sense, you want the apparatus to have some of those incentives.

[A]

You want them to care about safety and terrorism. Right.

[B]

So. So the problem is not with the people in the intelligence community who want to be aggressive. The problem is with the people of the other branches who have become so deferential that they're rubber stamps. Yes, a judge is the one who can say, I accept your security expertise, but you need to accept my expertise in proportionality. Because I also know that there's other values at stake. I also know that free speech and privacy are their values. I also know that even having courts give a resolution to this question is important. I mean, so much of what courts do when it comes to national security is just say we defer. We're not even going to decide whether this surveillance is legal. You don't even have a right to be in court. And so they dismiss these cases. And that's what Snowden did. Snowden essentially gave us the evidence that we needed to get a ticket into federal court and get these important questions decided.

[A]

But this is also, you know, a case of the past being prologue, because just last week Congress voted to extend a law known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This is FISA. And for those not familiar, what should my audience know about that?

[B]

I mean, Section 702 is the authority under which the NSA carried out those programs you put on your slide PRISM and upstream surveillance. The. The Debate over section 702 is what happens when you are targeting foreigners outside the country who don't have the same rights as people here. But in doing so, you sweep up the communications of people here. And according to the Snowden documents, a majority of the information that's swept up on these programs involves US Persons and Americans who do have constitutional rights against privacy. The debate in Congress right now is, you know, when the NSA has collected these hundreds of thousands or millions of records of US Citizens through targeting foreigners, should they have to get permission from a judge to look at the Americans information? The position of the Trump administration, the Biden administration, the Obama administration was. No. The position of a bipartisan coalition in Congress that includes some far right Republicans and liberal Democrats and groups like the ACLU is yes. And that's what's being debated as we speak in the House of Representatives right

[A]

now, as of last week. Are we where we started? Like, where are we?

[B]

My view is we need a Snowden about once every decade. And that's because secrecy allows the government to do things that we can't ever know about. Trump may be an exception. He seems to do everything out in the open. He illegally fires missiles at alleged drug smugglers in the Caribbean and then tweets the images almost as a snuff film.

[A]

Yeah, trailer style sometimes.

[B]

Right. But in general, we depend on investigative journalists, and investigative journalists depend on sources or whistleblowers to compete with the government over its monopoly on what we get to know about the government's activities. And that is vital. Almost everything we know about the government's misconduct in the post 911 war on terror, we know because people inside government shared it with journalists. Not because the Senate Intelligence Committee ferreted it out through hearings. Not because a Freedom of Information act lawsuit brought it from a court, although some of it, almost all of it, we know because courageous whistleblowers shared it with intrepid reporters and they shared it with the public.

[A]

And if that is the case. Then we here at Pablo Torre finds out for the record are interested.

[B]

Well, now that you're Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, you might want to use a technology called SecureDrop that will allow people to make anonymous encrypted submissions to you. The New York Times uses it, the New Yorker uses it and others.

[A]

And I'm Brian to announce that because Ben Weisner has just mentioned it. Of course, we are also doing that.

[B]

I've done my part. Now let me into the garden. Mr. Dolan.

[A]

Well, let's get back to that. You know, when it comes to the Knicks and comes to Madison Square Garden, it is interesting, right? Because a similar dynamic is at play. Will the public give a about this case study that seems to have nothing else condition us to some acceptance to some inertia of political will when it comes to take our public money and spy on us? Because God damn it, the Knicks might make the Finals.

[B]

Maybe the Knicks and I will be able to model constructive disagreement on this.

[A]

Ben, I, I. At the risk of jinxing everything, including your access to the Garden, I don't think you can fix him.

[B]

Then maybe we can just tolerate each other's differences.

[A]

Pablo torre finds out is produced by walter averoma, maxwell carney, ryan cortez, juan galindo, patrick kim, neely lohman, rob mcrae, matt sullivan, claire taylor and chris tominello. Studio engineering by rd systems. Sound design by andrew burcic. Digital strategy by bailey carlin and andrew andrew northern theme song as always, by john bravo and we'll talk to you next time.

[B]

Acast powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend.

[A]

If you've ever dreamed of quitting your

[B]

job to take your side hustle full time, listen up.

[A]

This is Michaela Matthews Akome, host of

[B]

Side Hustle Pro, a podcast that helps you build and grow from passion project to profitable business. Every week you'll hear from guests just like you who wanted to start a

[A]

business on the side. If you can't run a side hustle, you can't run a business.

[B]

They share real tips and so I started connecting with all these people on LinkedIn and I saw Target supplier diversity was having office hours.

[A]

Real advice. Procrastination is the easiest form of resistance

[B]

and the actual strategies they use to turn their side hustle into their main hustle. Getting back in touch with your tangible cash and sitting down and learning to give your money a job like it changes something. Check outside Hustle Pro every week on

[A]

your favorite podcast app and YouTube Acast

[B]

helps creators launch, grow and monetize the podcasts everywhere.

[A]

Acast.com. hey, honey, it's Mom. Did you know if we switch to

[B]

Verizon, we can get four phones for $0, plus four lines for $25 a line?

[A]

Call me back. Me again. That's just $100 a month for four lines on unlimited welcome.

[B]

Plus four phones.

[A]

No trade in needed. Call me. It's Mom. America's best network. Verizon. That's the one we're talking about.

[B]

I'll send you a text. America's best network based on RootMetric's best

[A]

overall mobile network performance. US second half, 2025.

[B]

Four new lines and unlimited welcome and autopay.

[A]

See verizon.com for details. Okay, caller one wins courtside seats to tonight's game.

[B]

What? I won floor seats. You did? I've been calling for 13 months. Wait.

[A]

Chris.

[B]

Yes. I finally did it.

[A]

What are you gonna wear?

[B]

Men's Wearhouse. They've got today's looks for any occasion, and I need to look like a celebrity. Don't want to stick out.

[A]

Exactly.

[B]

They've got Chill Flex by Kenneth Cole,

[A]

Joseph Abu, and a tailor at every store for the perfect fit.

[B]

Congrats. You can stop calling now. Not a chance. Get any look for every occasion at Men's Wearhouse.

[A]

Love the way you look.