Dave Smith (3:25)
Oh yeah. Oh yeah, yeah. No, it's, it's all ridiculous. But the year. Yeah, listen, we like the Mormons, but it's this, the alcohol thing we really got to talk about. As I was talking to this guy who owns like a couple dispensaries out here in, in Jersey and I thought, I don't know, it was interesting he was telling me that. So I didn't know this, but evidently in like in New York you can sell edibles that like whatever dosage, you know, you can get like 10 milligrams or 50 milligrams or 100 milligrams or whatever the THC count. And it is, but in Jersey it's legal. You can have the businesses, but you can only sell 10 milligram edibles. You can't sell any more than that. And so I, you know, he was telling me this is like the rule in Jersey that of course my, I thought, kind of obvious follow up question. I was like, but can't people just eat more of the gummies? And he was like, oh yeah, no, that's what everybody does. And then it was just like a great little example of like government rules and how stupid they are. But so he goes, he goes, my father is on, is on chemo. He goes, and the gummies really help him. Like they really help with his appetite and his sleep and just like not feeling so shitty. And he goes, but he's also diabetic and now he's got to eat five of these gummies instead of One of them. So he's still doing it. He's still eating the 50 milligrams. So anyway, I don't know, it's just like, for some reason it reminded me of that with the lowering the alcohol level in beer. Like, it's like, is someone who has a problem just gonna be like, ah, too bad? I really, I really would have liked a little bit more alcohol, but I. They only put so much beer. He's just gonna have another beer. You're just making them. You're just making people fatter. That's what all of this does. It just makes people fatter and equally as impaired as they otherwise would be. But, you know, government's bad at everything. Okay, so for today's episode, I did think it made sense to get into this. You know, it's. We, I, I guess I've been doing more like response episodes lately than, than we typically do, but I do think they're kind of necessary and they seem to get very good. So, you know, whatever. I don't know if this one's going to be quite as, as juicy as some of the other characters, but Mark Levin did go off partially on me. I think it was more on Tucker Carlson, but, you know, Jewish anti Semites. Yes, it's a real problem. Jewish. I am the Jewish face of anti Semitism or whatever. I've taken the Larry Elders title and morphed it a little bit, but it's kind of hard. Number one. I mean, the, the. I'm responding to people who are influential people and they're talking about issues that are, you know, the, the issues that we talk about. And I guess just because over the last, you know, month, my, my profile has been a, a bit higher than it ever has before. It's just been more often the case that I personally am involved in this, but, but it's really not, you know, and I mean, this, it's really, it's not about me. It's about the what matters. It's about the argument that's being made here. And it has been, it's just, it's been interesting. You know, I was a guy who became, you know, obsessed with politics about 20 years ago. And you know, it's, it's a. I've seen some people say over the last month or so that, you know, people be like, this Dave Smith guy came out of nowhere. Which is, I'm sure, true from their perspective, but it is a little bit different from my perspective. Like 20 years doesn't feel like out of nowhere. But if you could try to imagine it from my perspective. It's kind of, it's a little bizarre when you've got these people who were like huge figures now coming after me, you know, all these years later. Like, it's a little surreal, but it, it's also been, you know, I, I think I've, I've talked about this dynamic in the past and I really felt it when I, when I debated Dennis Prager when, when I remember going into that debate and you know, I, I debated a bunch of people on Israel already at the point, but I debated like Laura Loomer and Austin Peterson and these people who were like, they just don't really know anything. They're, they're not, they're not readers, you know, and they're like, was just kind of like my, my depth of knowledge in the issue just far surpassed theirs. And, and that's just very clear to anyone who watches the debate. And when I was debating Dennis Prager, I just kind of felt this pressure. Like, I was like, this guy, I've been watching this guy on TV since I was a kid. I remember watching him on Politically Incorrect, Bill Maher's old show. I must have been like 16 years old or something like that. The guy has been doing a radio show since I was born. Like, he's my entire life and this is his number one issue. As I remember feeling this pressure going into the debate, like, okay, I gotta really, I better be on point. I'm, I'm debating a guy who's been doing this my entire life and I'm debating him on his number one issue, you know, and then like right as the debate started, it was during his opening statement, I was just like, oh. And I had this realization and then I was just calm for the rest of the thing. And the realization was just simply that he had nothing. Like, I just couldn't even believe it. It was like, oh, he actually, he has nothing. He has no argument to protect, to present. And of course, the same has been true in all the big debates since then. I'm just kind of blown away by how much, oh, they don't actually have an argument. And that was kind of how I felt as, as this happened. But anyway, Mark Levin, I guess, still has a radio show and I'm sure there are, there are a decent amount of 80 year olds who still listen to it, but I don't know. You've, I'm sure, known who Mark Levin is over the years, Rob. Right.