PBD Podcast Ep. 701 Summary
Date: December 17, 2025
Title: DeSantis Fights Trump On AI, Ford's $19B EV Disaster + Musk's Net Worth SKYROCKETS
Episode Overview
The episode covers the week's hottest stories in business, innovation, technology, and politics with a sharp focus on developments in EVs, AI, and Big Tech. The Home Team, led by Patrick Bet-David (PBD), is joined by special guest Anthony Pompliano ("Pomp") for a wide-ranging, candid conversation—peppered with lively banter—on Ford’s $19B EV write-down, Tesla and Musk’s astronomical business moves, the role of AI in reshaping work and consulting, U.S.-China tech rivalry, political posturing on AI regulation, and more. They also share insights from inside their own companies and offer colorful commentary on trending stories and viral moments.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Ford's $19 Billion EV Disaster and U.S. Automotive Strategy
[08:53]
- Ford wrote down $19.5 billion as it pivots away from full EV production to focus on affordable hybrids and gas-powered vehicles with electric assist.
- Tom’s take: Blue state legislation (especially California's EV mandates) forced automakers’ hands, leading to poor business decisions under government pressure.
"I feel like California owes the Ford shareholders probably half of that $10 billion because that was done at legislative gunpoint." (Tom, [12:46]) - Pomp’s analysis: Consumers buy Teslas not because they’re EVs, but because they’re better cars—cool, high-status, and technologically advanced.
"If you get in a Tesla, that's the first time people sit in there, they feel like: this is a car from the future... It's a better experience as a car. So what Elon did was... he made the Tesla cool." (Pomp, [14:20]) - The group agrees Detroit's legacy carmakers were poorly positioned to compete due to bureaucracy, lack of entrepreneurial leadership, and weak innovation relative to Tesla and Chinese startups.
- Brandon adds: U.S. EV strategy is also flawed due to limited domestic access to critical minerals for battery manufacturing—making America dependent on China and Africa ([19:28]).
2. Tesla’s Runaway Stock, RoboTaxis, and Elon Musk as Economic Force
[24:48]–[32:42]
- Tesla’s stock hit new highs after confirming driverless robo-taxi tests in Austin.
- Pomp frames Tesla as more than a car company:
"I think it's a robotics company, I think it's a machine learning company, I think it's a data company... Tesla is probably the most pure play exposure in the public market to AI and robotics." ([27:00]) - Sticky investor base: Tesla’s loyal, retail-heavy shareholder base creates price stability and encourages FOMO for institutional capital ([29:03], [30:03]).
- Elon Musk’s dominance: The conversation highlights the unique power of founder-led firms; without Elon, Tesla wouldn’t be the same, just as Apple wouldn’t without Jobs ([30:49], [31:04]).
3. Elon Musk’s Ballooning Net Worth and SpaceX Valuation
[32:42]–[41:24]
- Musk is now worth $638B, with SpaceX valued at $800B—potentially making him the world’s first trillionaire.
- Pomp:
"For 30 years, for three decades, he has averaged the creation of a multibillion-dollar company every five years... It is incredible." ([34:08]) - Founders should see returns proportional to value creation.
"If you give him money... he will come back with many, many more resources for you." ([34:40]) - Tom crunches the numbers: Commission theory and private equity mechanics suggest Musk is actually underpaid for the value he created ([39:17]).
- Everyone agrees Musk deserves world-class protection given his growing influence across industries and geopolitics.
4. Startup Drama: Founder Fraud & VC Blind Spots
[48:20]–[57:01]
- The crew discusses the FBI investigation of a startup founder, Shiloh Johnson, for using $13M in investor money for personal luxuries while generating just $620 in actual revenue.
- Key Point: Industry pros note that top investors—including Kraft Ventures—were misled, but most major Silicon Valley players passed.
- Tom’s takeaway:
"One of the investors called the SEC after getting together with the rest of the investors... and said, somebody needs to take this chick down." ([50:13]) - Pomp adds: Even amid record fundraising, good investors usually avoid these cases thanks to robust diligence and intuition.
5. AI in Consulting, Business Operations & the Future of Work
[68:19]–[91:59]
- McKinsey set to cut thousands of jobs—a sign of AI’s impact on high-end white collar work once considered safe.
- Pomp: AI is turbocharging efficiency across industries; “companies talking about using AI are outperforming those who aren’t” ([68:19]).
- On “AI agents”: The future lies in task-specific AI agents (e.g., for HR, tax optimization, coding), which can dramatically increase output per worker and change consulting’s business model ([81:59]–[84:00]).
- Impact on jobs:
"If you are a knowledge worker, one, you actually think you're not the one that gets automated away... it's not clear to you that you're the one that's in the target of the AI, you know, kind of train." (Pomp, [73:30]) - Barbell effect: Tom predicts polarization—blue-collar and high-end knowledge workers see some consolidation; clerical and middle management are at risk ([85:27]).
- Empowerment vs. displacement:
"There's a story of displacement. On the other side, there's a story of empowerment... Learn how to use the tools and you will be one of the people who benefit..." (Pomp, [89:13]) - PBD: AI will not destroy 80% of jobs because economies depend on customers and workers’ purchasing power; human activity is crucial for a healthy society ([90:36]–[91:59]).
6. AI Politics: Trump vs. DeSantis and State vs. Federal Rights
[100:01]–[110:17]
- Topic: Trump’s AI executive order vs. DeSantis’ push for state-level AI regulation, especially around name/image/likeness and child protection.
- DeSantis:
"Clearly we have a right to do this... I think the stuff we're doing is going to be very consistent. But irrespective, clearly we have a right to do this.” ([102:18]) - Tom supports DeSantis: States are more nimble, better equipped to regulate emerging tech for their citizens’ needs ([104:49]).
"I'm with the states on this one and I'm with DeSantis.” ([107:14]) - Pomp suggests: Federal government should set only the loosest possible floor, letting states impose stricter rules if needed ([110:09]).
7. Other Notable Stories and Lighter Moments
- McDonald’s AI Christmas Ad: The group reacts to a pulled, AI-generated Christmas ad from the Netherlands that received public backlash, with Tom and Pomp defending its creativity ([60:57]–[65:10]).
- DeSantis vs. Doug Ford: DeSantis claps back at Canadian premier’s claim that Florida is hurting due to a Canadian boycott, using hard tourism numbers to show otherwise ([111:13]–[115:36]).
- Bernie Sanders & the AI Moratorium: Pomp points out the absurdity of advocating a pause on data centers—critical to U.S. competitiveness ([116:36]–[118:47]).
- World Cup Ticket Pricing: A suite for the 2026 final was listed at $885K for 17 tickets, then even resold at over $3M—sparking debate on market pricing and exclusivity ([126:41]–[128:13]).
- Speculative Politics: Lively banter on whether DeSantis, The Rock, Ivanka Trump, or Kim Kardashian could eventually become U.S. President ([120:31]–[126:02]).
Notable Quotes & Moments
- On Tesla’s edge:
"Most consumers buying a Ford F150, they don’t care about an electric vehicle. Actually, that may be a negative. Why would I want to buy a big truck that's electric if it's harder for me to go do the things I need to do?”
– Pomp, [14:20] - On Musk as a wealth creator:
"For 30 years, he has averaged the creation of a multibillion-dollar company every five years. Nobody has done that."
– Pomp, [34:08] - On AI and jobs:
"There's a story of displacement. On the other side, there's a story of empowerment."
– Pomp, [89:13] - On state vs. federal AI law:
"I'm with the states on this one and I'm with DeSantis. States are the function of nimble response.”
– Tom, [107:14] - On industry fraud:
"She didn't trick a single good investor. If you think about it, all of the people on the cap table, they're not known for being world class investors."
– Pomp, [52:47] - On speculation in politics:
"The best answer I ever heard was Ivanka Trump as a Democrat… but I started thinking about it more and… Kim Kardashian or the Rock."
– Pomp, [124:12]
Timestamps for Important Segments
- [08:53] Ford’s $19.5B EV write-down and industry fallout
- [14:20] Why Tesla wins: Consumer psychology and superior product
- [24:48] Tesla’s robo-taxis and the “cult” of Tesla investors
- [32:42] Musk’s net worth and SpaceX’s historic private valuation
- [34:08] Why Musk is the ultimate entrepreneur
- [68:19] AI’s impact on McKinsey, consulting, and business operations
- [84:00] AI-agent design and the future of personalized services
- [102:18] DeSantis states-rights argument on AI regulation
- [111:13] DeSantis responds to Doug Ford’s boycott claim
- [116:36] Reactions to AI moratorium proposals
- [126:41] World Cup suite prices reach $885k–$3.1M
Summary Table: Major Topics
| Topic | Time | Major Takeaways | |-----------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| | Ford EV Write-down | 08:53 | Forced by legislation; consumer indifference; shift to hybrids | | Tesla RoboTaxis & Stock | 24:48 | Tesla is an AI/robotics firm, not just auto; cult investor base | | Musk: First Trillionaire? | 32:42 | SpaceX valuation, Musk's “underpaid” value creation | | Startup Fraud Story | 48:20 | VCs deceived; importance of diligence; legal fallout | | McKinsey/AI Reshaping Work | 68:19 | AI-induced job cuts & efficiency explosion; new “agents” | | U.S. AI Regulation Debate | 100:01 | Trump federal order vs. DeSantis’ state defense; federalism | | Canadian Boycott Claims | 111:13 | DeSantis disputes with record tourism data |
Conclusion
This episode delivers deep analysis and spirited conversation on the future of the American auto industry, the unstoppable march of Musk, the disruptive influence of AI, and the political battles brewing over technology’s role in our lives. The panel underscores that innovation doesn’t always align with policy or legacy corporate thinking. Success requires understanding real consumer desire, leaning into technology’s advantages—even as we brace for the societal challenges brought by rapid change.
For more detail, listeners can jump to any of the segment timestamps above for in-depth discussion on the topics that matter most to them.
