173. Steve Levitt Says Goodbye to People I (Mostly) Admire

Summary

People I (Mostly) Admire – Episode 173

"Steve Levitt Says Goodbye to People I (Mostly) Admire"
Released: December 20, 2025
Host: Stephen Dubner (interviewer), Steven Levitt (guest)

---

Episode Overview

In this final episode, Steven Levitt, longtime host and Freakonomics co-author, reflects on the five-year journey of "People I (Mostly) Admire" (PIMA) as he prepares to end the show. Levitt gets interviewed by his friend and co-author Stephen Dubner, flipping the familiar script. Together, they examine how podcasting transformed Levitt, the show's origins, the lessons he’s learned about learning, curiosity, and engagement, his next projects, and the impact of meaningful conversations. Levitt and Dubner also discuss memorable moments, difficult interviews, and what's next for both Levitt and the Freakonomics universe. The episode closes with touching listener voice memos about the show's impact.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Why End the Show Now?

Levitt's Motivation and the Arc of PIMA

• Despite an ever-growing list of impressive guests, Levitt chooses to step away, feeling both fulfilled and in search of new challenges.
• He reflects on the difficulty of booking dream guests and what he hoped to achieve (e.g., an interview with Joel Osteen), and the limits of celebrity-driven interview “markets.”
• Quote:

  “There are endless people I admire... I thought as we got [our guest] list... everyone would just come. But they don't.” — Levitt (02:56)

2. How Hosting Changed Levitt

• Levitt admits hosting was "the last thing I ever should have done," given his nature as an introvert and rationalist (01:57).
• Despite discomfort, being an interviewer structured his life, forced growth, and led to unexpected personal and intellectual rewards.
• Preparation ("a real tax on my time") made each episode meaningful and led him to read more and become intellectually re-engaged.
• Quote:

  “Every idea that I have just put out there, I have stolen from one of my guests and repackaged it in my own words. There’s no doubt about that.” — Levitt (28:23)

3. Origin of the Podcast

• Levitt recalls being "tricked" into podcasting by Dubner—initial guest hosting on Freakonomics Radio, then interviewing Rahm Emanuel, despite being nervous and inexperienced (08:42–09:46).
• The discipline of deadlines and engaging with ideas rather than generating them re-energized him.
• Timestamps:
  • Deciding to do the show (08:42)
  • First challenging interview: Rahm Emanuel (09:17)

4. Levitt’s Work and Passions After PIMA

• Levitt discusses launching the Levitt Lab, new approaches to education, and scaling up to more locations (12:52).
• He’s inspired by mastery learning, influenced by interviews with Sal Khan and David Yeager, aiming to overhaul how students engage with knowledge and success (14:09–16:11).
• The emotional resonance of seeing young people engaged in learning outweighs his self-ascribed lack of people skills.
• Quote:

  “If I could actually make a dent in the way that we teach and change education, that would really feel like I did something.” — Levitt (13:57)

5. Rethinking Education, Motivation, and AI

• Levitt critiques the "rat race" of modern education, drawing from personal experience and conversations with guests.
• He champions individualized learning and celebrating diverse forms of student achievement rather than a single “valedictorian” mold.
• Discusses how AI is a double-edged sword:
  • For the engaged, it’s a powerful tool for "just-in-time" learning.
  • For the disengaged, it enables avoidance of learning.
• Quote:

  “If students are not engaged, they can get by without learning a single thing... If we can get students engaged, we will have unbelievable results, and if we don’t, we are facing disaster.” — Levitt (22:41)

6. Standout Episodes and Guests

Levitt recounts his most memorable interviews:

• Daughters Amanda and Lily (Ep. 46): Surprising emotional openness and connection in studio.
• Dr. BJ Miller: Deep, honest conversation about death, disability, and meaning (32:06–34:23).
• Wendy MacNaughton: A rare artist-economist conversation; immediate emotional connection (34:23–34:59).
• Yuval Noah Harari: Risking direct critique, Levitt elicits a unique, open exchange, producing the show's most popular episode (35:57–38:27).

Quote:

"BJ [Miller] talks about death in a way that I've never heard anyone talk about it. My favorites almost always involve episodes that have a human connection because... this has really been my primary way of making real connections." — Levitt (33:50)

7. Challenges and Disappointments

Levitt details some "misses" and difficult guests:

• Richard Dawkins: Difficult dynamic, but won the guest over by end, leading to a follow-up live event that Levitt felt he mishandled (40:03–42:13).
• Jared Diamond: Disappointing; deeply scripted and repetitive.
• Werner Herzog and Arnold Schwarzenegger: Both refused to engage off-script; Herzog insisted only on talking about poetry, Schwarzenegger wouldn’t wear headphones, limiting dialogue (42:36–43:45).
  Despite frustrations, Levitt finds value in both process and outcome.

8. What’s Next for Levitt and the Show

• PIMA will rebroadcast its archive.
• Levitt will guest host episodes of Freakonomics Radio, excited to tackle policy and impact.
• He expresses hope that he’s "quitting at the right time"—“at least I didn't wait too long” (51:01).
• Quote:

  “What you do on Freakonomics Radio is actually journalism, and I'm excited to try my hand at being a journalist for a little while.” — Levitt (50:37)

---

Notable Quotes and Memorable Moments

• “It is true that being an interviewer was roughly the last thing I ever should have done.” — Levitt (01:57, again echoed at 28:38)
• “A regular person, if you substitute the word 'universe' [for 'God'], they’d be like, 'what are you talking about? It doesn’t make sense.' ...But it's a much easier concept for me to grasp.” — Levitt (05:20)
• “In a typical school, there’s only one way to succeed. ...At our school, kids are writing their own music, making stop motion films... Or a novella. ...As long as you open the aperture ...suddenly you go from a world in which it’s us versus them... to all the kids at the school being empowered to do great stuff.” — Levitt (19:24–21:27)
• “Every idea that I have just put out there, I have stolen from one of my guests and repackaged it in my own words.” — Levitt (28:23)
• “You can have very little talent for interviewing, but I think if you've really prepared, it can still go pretty well.” — Levitt (35:57)
• “Even though I know it's the right thing to do, it's still hard to say goodbye to this podcast.” — Levitt (51:08)

---

Important Timestamps

• 02:56 — Levitt on the realities of booking high-profile guests.
• 08:42 — How PIMA began; Levitt’s early reluctance and nervousness.
• 12:52 — Levitt on stopping the show and investing in his education ventures.
• 16:11 — The influence of Sal Khan and mastery learning.
• 22:41 — Reflections on AI, engagement, and the future of education.
• 28:23 — How Levitt’s approach to ideas evolved.
• 32:00–35:00 — Levitt's top 3 most meaningful episodes.
• 40:03–42:13 — Lessons from difficult interviews (Dawkins, Diamond, Herzog, Schwarzenegger).
• 47:20 — Announcement of Levitt appearing on future Freakonomics Radio episodes.
• 51:53–55:07 — Touching listener voice memos on the show's impact.

---

Listener Impact and Final Reflections

The episode concludes with four emotionally resonant listener messages, each highlighting how PIMA changed perspectives, inspired academic research, or provoked major life decisions (e.g., changing careers based on Sendhil Mullainathan's advice about environment and identity). Levitt is visibly moved, noting how it reinforces the “community of smart, thoughtful people” the podcast helped create (51:53).

---

Conclusion: The Legacy of PIMA

Levitt’s swan song is honest, wry, and ultimately optimistic—reinforcing the value of curiosity, authenticity, and deep work, while acknowledging that change and discomfort are necessary for evolution. As Levitt steps away from PIMA, he looks forward to guest-hosting Freakonomics Radio, with the hope of amplifying his impact on education and policy, and Dubner celebrates Levitt’s growth as both a thinker and interviewer.

“Maybe that’s why I mostly admire you.” — Diana Choquette, listener (55:07)

---

For Fans and New Listeners

Whether you’re a longtime devotee or a newcomer, this episode captures the spirit of curiosity, humility, and honest conversation that made "People I (Mostly) Admire" special. The full archive will replay, and Levitt promises to stay present—albeit in new forms. The community, the thoughtful advice, and the willingness to become a learner once again—these are the show’s enduring gifts.

Transcript

[Stephen Dubner]

Guys, thanks for helping me carry my Christmas tree.

[Steven Levitt]

Zoe, this thing weighs a ton. Drew Ski, live with your legs, man. Santa. Santa, did you get my letter?

[Stephen Dubner]

He's talking to you britches.

[Steven Levitt]

I'm not.

[Stephen Dubner]

Of course he did. Right, Santa, you know my elf Drew Ski here.

[Steven Levitt]

He handles the nice list. And elf, I'm six' three. What everyone wants is iPhone 17 and at T Mobile, you can get it on them. That center stage front camera is amazing for group selfies.

[Stephen Dubner]

Right, Mrs. Claus? I'm Mrs. Claus. Claus much younger sister. And AT T Mobile, there's no trade in needed when you switch, so you can keep your old phone or give.

[Steven Levitt]

It as a gift.

[Stephen Dubner]

And the best part, you can make the switch to T Mobile from your phone in just 15 minutes. Nice.

[Steven Levitt]

My side of the tree is slipping. Kimber, the holidays are better. AT T Mobile, switch in just 15 minutes and get iPhone 17 on us with no trade in needed. And now T mobile is available in US cellular stores with 3, 4 monthly.

[Stephen Dubner]

Bill credits for well qualified customers plus tax and $35 vice connection charge. Credit sentinel balance due to payout earlier. Cancel finance agreement. 256 gigs, $830 eligible Ford in a new line, $100 plus a month plan with auto check out 15 minutes or less per line.

[Steven Levitt]

Visit t mobile.com what does it mean to live a rich life? It means brave first leaps, tearful goodbyes, and everything in between. With over 100 years experience navigating the ups and downs of the market and of life, your Edward Jones financial advisor will be there to help you move ahead with confidence. Because with all you've done to find your rich, we'll do all we can to help you keep enjoying it. Edward Jones Member, SIPC. After more than five years making this podcast, here we are, the final episode. As a way of saying goodbye, we're flipping the script. Today, my friend and Freakonomics co author Stephen Dubner will be the interviewer and I get to be the interviewee.

[Stephen Dubner]

You having done People I Mostly Admire for the last five years, it feels like it changed you fundamentally.

[Steven Levitt]

It is true that being an interviewer was roughly the last thing that I ever should have done.

[Stephen Dubner]

Welcome to people I mostly admire with steve levitt.

[Steven Levitt]

Even after five years of doing this show, I'm still 100 times more comfortable being interviewed than doing interviews. I wonder, as you listen to this episode, whether you'll be able to hear that in my voice.

[Stephen Dubner]

Hey, Levitt.

[Steven Levitt]

Hey, Dubner. How are you doing?

[Stephen Dubner]

I'm good. How are you doing?

[Steven Levitt]

I'm good.

[Stephen Dubner]

So this is the final new episode of People I Mostly Admire, at least for now. Does that mean you've run out of people you admire?

[Steven Levitt]

No, there are endless people I admire. I always thought it would get easier and easier to get people to come on the podcast, because my own rule when I'm asked to come on a podcast is I look at who's been on it before, and if they're way more interesting and important than I am, then I'm, oh, I better do it, because those people know better than me. I believe in markets, but so I thought as we got this list that got more and more impressive, everyone would just come. But they don't.

[Stephen Dubner]

Other than Taylor Swift, who's on the top of your wish list?

[Steven Levitt]

I've always wanted Joel Osteen, the radio TV evangelist.

[Stephen Dubner]

Oh, yeah.

[Steven Levitt]

I just find the way he speaks to be so remarkable. So even before I started the podcast, one day shortly before my birthday, my wife Suzanne said, I have a surprise for your birthday. We're going to go on a trip. And my reaction was, oh, no, there's nowhere I want to go. There's nothing I want to do. And I was so afraid it was going to be a party or something. Thank God it wasn't a party.

[Stephen Dubner]

How about a silent retreat? Would that have been better?

[Steven Levitt]

That would have been better than the party, but it still would have been pretty bad. But she took me to Houston to go watch Joel Osteen in person. Those few hours in the Compact center, which is where he does the preaching, it was truly magical. I would recommend it to anyone, atheist, whatever. It was a community of people coming together in a way that was so powerful, and I always wanted to talk to him about that. And I tried pretty hard to get him to talk to me, but never made any headway.

[Stephen Dubner]

What would you have wanted to ask him?

[Steven Levitt]

I wanted to express to him how powerful I found his message, even though I don't even believe in God. So when I listened to his sermons, I just substitute the word universe for Jesus and for God and treat it more like some kind of New Agey thing. But he seems to really feel what he's saying, and he preaches this gospel of empowerment, and at the same time, it's so counter to what many people associate with religion. He lives in a really fancy house, and I'm sure he has tons and tons of money. I was just curious to see if I could get him at all to talk like a regular person, which I'm sure I couldn't, but that was my goal. I was wondering what it was like to talk to Joel when he wasn't on stage.

[Stephen Dubner]

It'd be interesting to know what would happen if you could substitute the word universe for every time you said Jesus Christ or God. Like, I would like to see the results of an experiment where a whole bunch of people watch or read a sermon where you do that. What do you think would be the effect?

[Steven Levitt]

I think a regular person, if you substitute the word universe, they'd be like, what are you talking about? It doesn't make any sense. But I kind of believe, or at least I have at times in my life, believed, that somehow the universe seemed to be taking care of me. I think I don't really believe that anymore, but certainly it's a much easier concept for me to grasp the idea that the universe is taking care of me than that Jesus or some kind of Christian God is looking over me. You have to have been around New Agey people for a long time. My mom was New Agey. My wife Suzanne, is New Agey, which.

[Stephen Dubner]

Is odd, considering maybe not so odd that you married someone who had that in common with your mom, just because that's what some psychologists say is common. But I've never known anyone to be more disdainful of everything New Agey than you.

[Steven Levitt]

No, that's not true. So, clearly, I'm a rationalist through and through, and I believe more than anything in the power of science. But I think as a kid, I was willing to listen to my mom's very odd takes on the world, and I didn't really believe it. But as I got older and older, I've seen enough evidence. No the power of placebo. I think some of the nicest and best and most interesting people I know just have a faith in the universe and believe in stuff that's a little bit out there. When Suzanne and I, we went to India for a month, I talked about it on the Sam Harris episode of this podcast, But I went so grudgingly. I really only went because she doesn't have a lot of common sense. And I thought if she was alone in India for a month, she probably wouldn't come back alive. And so I went in. Part of the deal was she said we couldn't use our phones, we. Which I don't know why I ever gave into that. I guess when you're first dating people, you do things that you wouldn't do later. But the first two weeks of that trip, I was miserable, and I was angry and I was frustrated, and eventually I did have something like a spiritual Awakening. And it came because she would say, well, what do you want to do in India? And I would rack my brain and I'd say, actually, there's not a single thing that I would like to do here. I'm indifferent to everything. And suddenly everything was as good as anything else. I'd be on a crowded bus, stinky and rattling around, stuck in traffic, and I think, well, there's nothing I want to do when I get there. So it's not really any different being on a bus than being someplace. And suddenly I just opened up to a kind of friendliness with the universe. And everything was good and I was peaceful and it lasted for months after I came back. And every once in a while I can tap into it again and. And it really was, I think, very much a Buddhist thing. This idea that when you're always striving for something, it's that not ever being able to get there that gets you upset. So if you're not striving for anything, then everything is hunky dory. As I have gotten older, I've gotten much, much more open minded about the power of spirituality. Spiritual things that when we first met, I would have thought were bunch.

[Stephen Dubner]

So you did. People I mostly admire for five years, which surprised me when I looked it up. It went fast, at least for me. I don't know, maybe the five felt like 20 years to you, but can you just describe the arc of it from your perspective?

[Steven Levitt]

I don't have a very good memory, so I don't know how you tricked me into doing it in the first place, because I know that I wouldn't have done it on my own volition. I know that you had to be at the heart of tricking me. I think what happened was you said, hey, Levitt, why don't you try doing one guest host on Freakonomics Radio. And I did. I did two of them. And those were amazing experiences because one was on the rainforest and the other was on math and education. And the impact that especially the math and education went at, it was just really surprising how much people cared. So then I think you were going to interview Rahm Emanuel.

[Stephen Dubner]

That's right.

[Steven Levitt]

And you said, well, why don't you just do it? And God, I don't know why. I think I was still on the high of having done those other two ones that every. So I did the Rahm Emanuel interview and all I remember from that is it was incredibly stressful because Rahm is a tough guy and he was in the worst mood that day. And I Just remember feeling bad. I was bad at what I was doing and I was nervous anyway. That was hard. But it couldn't have been that bad because it was.

[Stephen Dubner]

It couldn't have been that bad for you to say yes.

[Steven Levitt]

Yeah, I guess I figured if I could interview Rahm Emanuel on a bad day, I could probably interview other people. And what's been great about the podcast is it facilitated a really important change in my own life. For so many years as an academic, I was laser focused on the creation of knowledge and trying to come up with ideas. And I was tired of that. And by the end, I didn't have any good ideas. And it was so useful for me to pivot into a role of being someone who was a consumer of ideas. If I tallied up the number of books I read over a 20 year period before I started this podcast, maybe I read 30 books in 20 years.

[Stephen Dubner]

Wow.

[Steven Levitt]

And honestly, they were almost all young adult fiction because mostly I just read the books that my kids were reading, like Harry Potter and the Twilight series. I hadn't read anything that was about science or about psychology since I was in grad school, maybe. And it's been great for me to just spend time reading what smart people are thinking and then having to pull that all together with the discipline of deadlines. The other thing that's been great for me about Pima is I have almost no deadlines in my life. And really my entire adult life, I haven't had deadlines because as an academic, you almost never have to do anything on time. But. But it's the tension that comes with actually having deadlines and feeling pressure and knowing you have to deliver. That's been a good source of discipline for me. A good reminder of what you can do. I would frequently be up until 3 or 4 in the morning trying to pull together some kind of set of themes I'd be able to talk with people about.

[Stephen Dubner]

Well, I'll share a secret with you. The reason that a lot of writers, and especially journalists, become journalists is because it forces you to do the work which was good and bad. Especially if there's a quota that you have to fill. It can get sloppy. But, well, to that point, Pima was every week originally to every other week. What was that change about?

[Steven Levitt]

Oh, I couldn't do it. It was ruining my life when I had to do it every week.

[Stephen Dubner]

I love how 3 minutes ago you said it's the best thing that ever happened to me, and now it's ruining your life.

[Steven Levitt]

Well, every week was bad, though, because at first, it was kind of exciting, but I really. Maybe because I'm insecure or maybe because I felt such an obligation to these amazing guests to do a good job, but I would invest. I learned it from you. Really. I learned it from you to invest an enormous amount of time in preparation for these interviews. So if somebody had written books, I tried to read every one of their books, and I tried to read their academic articles and figure out whatever I could about their personal life. It was a real tax on my time. And doing it every week, it felt like a pressure cooker. But every other week was perfect because it was just enough to make me feel like I always had a little pressure on me, but not so much that I had to be grumpy and mean to everyone else in my life to get it done.

[Stephen Dubner]

So if it was perfect, why do you want to stop?

[Steven Levitt]

My dilemma is that I have so many amazing possibilities out there for things to do that I never get done. A third or a tenth of the things that I could do. I started this one school called the Levitt Lab, and I fought so hard not to have a call down. I win many battles, but that one I did not win. And the first one is location located in the middle of the Arizona State campus in Tempe, Arizona. And we're going to start two more in the fall of 2026, one outside Boston and one in LA. And I have found that to be a uniquely rewarding experience. I can't even explain why, because, you know, I'm not a people person in any way, shape or form, but there's something about the students, about the learners when I'm on the campus and how engaged these learners are with it. I'm not sure why that touches me so deeply, but it really, it feels almost like when my grandchildren come, this is the thing I'll talk to them about. Obviously, Freakonomics has been awesome and it's had a big impact, but it feels to me like if I could actually make a dent in the way that we teach and change education, that would really feel like I did something.

[Stephen Dubner]

When did you start getting as driven as you are by that appetite? Was it always in you, or is it more recent?

[Steven Levitt]

No, it wasn't in me at all. And the first hint of it came when I did that guest spot on Freakonomics Radio and we talked about math education, and that was just a lark. I was just doing that because I was angry, because I thought that my kids were suffering so much. The response to it kindled a little bit of A spark. But it was really on my podcast, talking with Sal Khan. And Sal Khan is the first person who introduced me to what's called mastery learning. It's just the idea that the model of how we teach kids in a classroom with a teacher and 30 kids all being taught the same thing, and then moving on to the next topic as soon as that one's over, and ignoring whether the kid has learned it or whether the kid already knows it, it's just a terribly inefficient way of doing things. And once Sal Khan told me about mastery learning and showed me the data, which is really shocking, how much faster kids can learn, suddenly it changes the way you think about education, because if you can actually do mastery learning, you free up three or four hours in a school day that you can spend however you want with the kids, and then it becomes this flight of imagination about what do you do with the kids that will change their lives, that will get them engaged with the learning. So that's when the spark came. And still, it was kind of just a spark. This is during COVID and I tried to encourage Sal Khan to start an online school. And so I kept on emailing him over and over saying, hey, we should start an online school. We should start an online school. And then maybe the 10th time I wrote to him, he called me five minutes later and said, hey, I am starting an online school. Do you want to help me out with it? And that was the Con World school. And I had Sail on the podcast two more times to talk about that. And then it just felt like, if you can have a big impact in an online school, well, just imagine what you might be able to do in person. And even then, I was excited about it. But it wasn't until I actually was on the ground at the school in Arizona that it fully hit me how powerful it is to see young people engaged.

[Stephen Dubner]

When you're trying to recruit students, how are you communicating to students and their parents? Like, it's this kind of school, and this is what's going to happen.

[Steven Levitt]

Actually, the way I pitch it was deeply affected by another one of the guests that we had on the show, David Yeager, who's a psychologist at University of Texas at Austin. It's interesting when you can get a set of parents and kids into the room who are potentially interested in going to your school. I talk only to the students. Everyone else in the room talks only to the adults. But I just turn to the kids and I say, hey, I'm really embarrassed to have to say this. But my generation, me, your parents, we all have been selling you a complete set of lies. We've been telling you that if you work hard and you get good grades and you do a little bit of volunteering, then you'll get into a great college and you'll go to college, and after you graduate, you'll have a great career. And it's all a set of lies, because it is. What we're teaching kids doesn't make sense. By the time they get to high school, nobody's engaged. And the saddest part for me is watching some of my students at the University of Chicago. These are the students who've won the high school lottery, right? They've done all the things right. They've been valedictorian and they've gotten great sats and acts, and they get to the U of C, one of the most exclusive schools in the world, and they don't want to learn. They don't want to. Don't care the slightest bit about learning. All they want to do is get A's. They want to check boxes. To me, that is about the most discouraging thing I can imagine. These are such talented kids who have been given an incentive scheme which has beaten all the life out of them.

[Stephen Dubner]

What were you like at 22, let's say.

[Steven Levitt]

Oh, God, I was exactly like that. I was the worst college student imaginable. I was way ahead of my time because I was exactly like these box checkers before anyone else was. So at Harvard, I had no intrinsic interest in anything. My way of choosing classes was to say, I'm going to take all the biggest classes because as long as there's 800 students in it, I'll be completely faceless. I'll never have to talk to a professor. They'll be really easy because they always grade the big classes easy. And mostly I was at Harvard to play wiffle ball and street hockey and video games and drink a lot. I got straight A's at Harvard, basically, but without ever trying to learn anything. It was only when I graduated and went and worked in consulting that I realized that I actually liked ideas and I was curious about ideas.

[Stephen Dubner]

Do you tell that story to these would be high school students?

[Steven Levitt]

Years I have not told that story to the high school students because it's.

[Stephen Dubner]

A little bit like a scared straight story. Here comes this guy, Steve Levitt, accomplished economist, taught at University of Chicago for many years, PhD from MIT, went to undergrad at Harvard, and he's here to tell you that it's all a facade or mirage or whatever you want to call it. If I were working with you on this project, I would encourage you to open up like that, Especially since you were, as you put it ahead of the curve on just ticking the boxes. Because I just wonder how the message that you were selling gets received otherwise. Because I just don't know how many people are really frustrated about the status quo that you're describing. It seems like everybody's bought into it.

[Steven Levitt]

You're right. It's really hard to convince people. And the only people who really came to our school were people who were so deeply dissatisfied with traditional education, mostly because they were bullied or they felt like they didn't fit in. But I think really the people who will ultimately benefit the most from my approach to education, if it ever takes off, are the talented people. Because this rat race that is taking such a toll on the mental health and on the creativity and on the joy of the people who are succeeding is really destructive. And the subtle thing that we do at our school that I think is maybe the single most powerful thing we do, is we celebrate a much wider array of accomplishments. So in a typical school, there's only one way to succeed. You get straight A's, you get to be the valedictorian, and that is the key to delete schools. But at our school, kids are writing their own music and producing it. Or making stop motion films where they're building with their hands devices to measure particulates, with mechanisms to turn on a fan that sucks the air pollution out. Or a novella. One of our students is writing a novella. You know, you can write an awesome novella and everyone else around you can cheer and say, that is fantastic. I'm so glad you did that. Without having at the same time each student think, oh, no, I didn't write a novella. That means I'm going to be a failure because I'm doing my stop motion film. And as long as you open the aperture and make it so that there are lots of ways to succeed, suddenly you go from a world in which it's us versus them. The us is me and my parents, and the them is the other kids at the school. The us is all the kids at the school who are being empowered to do great stuff. And I think if we could transform schools so that every kid felt like who they were was enough and that they should be trying to be who they are instead of trying to be valedictorian, it would change everything. And that's what gets me so excited about it.

[Stephen Dubner]

One thing I wonder about is how the mainstream introduction of a certain kind of AI. Let's just consider ChatGPT, the media and AI that most people are exposed to and either love or fear or hate or whatever. How do you see what you're trying to do intersect with this moment? Because I could see it going both ways. I could see some people and I would raise my hand here thinking, wow, if knowledge like that is at the touch of everyone's fingertips so easily, that's awesome because I don't have to spend all my time teaching that to kids if I'm a teacher or memorizing it if I'm a kid and I can actually just know that I learned, live with a big foundation of amazing knowledge and I can actually now think more deeply, more creatively, et cetera. And then I could imagine there are people who take the exact opposite, which is to say if you let AI become a major character in the way that we educate people, then what are we even doing here? I hear both sentiments expressed, so I'm curious. A, I have a feeling I know where your sentiment lies would be in battle position one that I just argued, I'm guessing. But B I really want to know how you see it being a tool that's used in a learning environment like yours.

[Steven Levitt]

I'm going to surprise you with my answer. I think both of those groups are exactly right. If you are an engaged learner and you want to learn something like you and I when we're trying to prepare for an interview, there's never been a tool like AI, like Gemini ChatGPT for learning quickly when you need to learn something. If you are unengaged and you are trying to find a way not to learn anything, there has never been a tool as effective as AI. And I think the problem is and why both are right. If students are not engaged, they can get by without learning a single thing where you talked about oh, but AI lets me think deeply and critically about all sorts of issues without having to learn a bunch of silly facts. That's true, but you also have a basis for thinking about the world because you've learned a lot of stuff along the way. It is a tremendous fear and a rightful fear. The idea that the standard way we teach where students are unengaged, AI has undone that. And I watch my own kids skirt through life learning nothing, letting AI do everything for them. This is why over and over I'm stressing engagement and how when you see the kids engaged, it's so powerful and so emotional as an adult to watch it, I think it's because engagement has become the thing that is the linchpin to education right now. Because when kids are engaged, they are empowered through AI and everything else to learn in a way that you and I couldn't have learned when we were kids because we had to go to the library. It took forever to get our hands onto the keys to knowledge. If you look at engagement levels of kids as they go through the educational system, kids in elementary school are by and large really engaged. And through junior high and high school, there's a sharp drop off. I honestly think that's going to be the key on which everything turns. If we can get students engaged, we will have unbelievable results, and if we don't, we are facing disaster. We'll be right back with more of my conversation with Stephen Dubner about the end of People I Mostly Admire after this short break. People I Mostly Admire is sponsored by El Mayor Tequila, a clean premium tequila that proves less is really more. Here's the deal. El Mayor is made with just three ingredients, 100% blue Weber agave water and heirloom yeast. That's it. No gimmicks, no extras, just tequila made the right way with an award winning difference. You can taste what's even better. You can often find it at half the price of other premium tequilas, which leaves plenty of room for holiday shopping. You keep it stocked and share it proudly because it's clean, smooth and always worth the pour. Think of it as your house tequila. The latest release, El Mayor Cafe Reposado, takes that same clean tequila and rests it in coffee seasoned bourbon barrels, adding a natural coffee kissed flavor. Whether you're mixing up espresso martinis for the holidays or sipping it fireside, it's perfect for this time of year. Discover [e-mail] and find Elmior at a retailer near you. Please enjoy responsibly. People I Mostly Admire is sponsored by Rula. Telehealth has made mental health care accessible for millions of people, but finding a suitable therapist, scheduling appointments and expensive out of pocket costs can save still feel like a huge barrier. Thankfully, Rula has you covered. Rula partners with a network of over 15,000 therapists and psychiatrists, enabling you to find the right therapist for your needs and preferences. And get this, the average copay is as little as $15 per session. Rula sticks with you throughout every step from therapy to medication management. Simply answer a few questions and get started as soon as the next day. Thousands have already trusted to support them on their journey toward improved mental health and overall well being, head over to rula.com admire to get started today. After you sign up and they ask where you heard about them, please tell them our show sent you go to r u l a.com admire and take the first step towards better mental health today. You deserve quality care from someone who cares.

[Stephen Dubner]

JBL Wireless Earbuds are packed with innovation. Touchscreen smart charging case for one touch control, instant EQ customization, true adaptive noise cancellation and a one of a kind audio transmitter to plug and play from almost any source. Plus Spatial360 sound on anything. The new JBL wireless earbuds. Levitt, I have to say I have not heard you this excited since. Well, maybe when you visited me in New York maybe a month ago, I had clamado for you. You were excited by that. But outside of clamado, this is the most excited I've heard you in a long time. And it strikes me that you are the one that's engaged now, plainly. And it also strikes me that the way that you got engaged in this project at least was by actually, I hate the cliche phrase, but going out of your comfort zone to become an interviewer because when we first met, that was one of your least favorite things to do. So I feel like you having done people I mostly admire for the last five years, it feels like it changed you fundamentally.

[Steven Levitt]

Oh, it did for sure. I mean, every idea that I have just put out there, I have stolen from one of my guests and repackaged it in my own words. There's no doubt about that.

[Stephen Dubner]

As it should be. That's what knowledge transfer is supposed to be.

[Steven Levitt]

David Eagleman came on my podcast and he works on the plasticity of the brain.

[Stephen Dubner]

That was such a good episode.

[Steven Levitt]

I love him. He introduced me to this phrase of just in case learning versus just in time learning, which. Which has transformed my way of thinking about the world. Because everything we do in school is, oh well, we're going to teach you proofs about triangles because maybe you're going to in 15 years be an architect and somehow need this. Of course that doesn't work because no one remembers it for five minutes versus just in time learning, where somebody really needs to know something to solve some problem, so they learn it. For me, I spent 16 years failing to learn any math at all. And then when I got admitted to MIT and I looked in those first syllabi, what I was gonna have to know, I learned five years of math in three weeks because I needed to learn it. I didn't have the words for it Then. But I realized what just in time learning was. Or another example. I fiddled around all through high school, didn't care about anything, did all my box checking. And then when they opened a racetrack in Minnesota at Canterbury Downs and I was losing all my money trying to bet on horses, I need to be better. And that's when I decided I would really learn how to computer program. And so I would stay up all night doing something that had never occurred to me that would have any value, but it was with the purpose of trying to win at the racetrack. I've lived these things that I'm now preaching. But going back to your question, it is true that being an interviewer was roughly the last thing that I ever should have done. You and I have been on book tours, and there's nothing better for me than going on a book tour with you because you are the ultimate extrovert and you love to talk to people. And I can spend the entire time. Time just sitting there looking around. Don't say that.

[Stephen Dubner]

I deeply dispute that. For instance, we recently had a little 20th anniversary Freakonomics party, and I made a little speech, and then I said, levitt, would you like to say a few words? And you literally said, no. And then I keep going because it felt like it was too short. And then five minutes later, you start telling the story and it was great, and you're just going. So I think you have this image of yourself as less. I don't know, whatever you want to call it, adept or excited about. Look, I've known you a long time now. I know what I feel is pretty much the real you, the inside you, the always you. And I think you give yourself not enough credit for what's the inside, always you.

[Steven Levitt]

Well, that's kind of you to say. But like my wife would say, what do you want for your birthday? And the answer, I don't say because it's too rude, is I would like everyone to go away and I have a week where I didn't talk to a single person and nobody bothered me for a week. That would be my dream. And I might get tired after a week. But I can't remember a time where I was alone and I ever thought, geez, I wish I weren't alone.

[Stephen Dubner]

Why are you not going to a silent retreat every week?

[Steven Levitt]

The problem with silent retreats is they actually have a lot of routine and they make you work. You have to clean the dishes and stuff like that. I literally just want to be alone.

[Stephen Dubner]

Let me ask you this. Over the five years you Were doing people I mostly admire interviews. Who were your three? I want to say the most memorable, let's say for you, just name the three and why.

[Steven Levitt]

So my own daughters, Amanda and Lily.

[Stephen Dubner]

That was a great episode. Number 46 for anyone who hasn't heard it, if you want to look it.

[Steven Levitt]

Up, just because it was so surprising to me. I haven't had a good conversation with my daughters in a decade, but something about being locked up in a studio. We were face to face in a studio and my having had to prepare just let it to be really magical. I think it was unexpected for everyone. Another episode that has really stuck with me was an interview I did with a doctor who focuses on end of life care, BJ Miller. BJ had a terrible accident when he was at Princeton and he lost his legs and arm.

[Stephen Dubner]

He was trying to jump on a train or something.

[Steven Levitt]

They have this electric train, the little putt putt train that goes from the Amtrak train to the campus. And he touched the electrified wire in a terrible accident. And so I've seen a lot of interviews with BJ and when people see him, they can see that he's had limbs amputated. And he always explains to people how that happened. And. And I had a thought of, well, this is radio, this podcast, so people can't see him. So I want to have a conversation with BJ in which nobody who doesn't know him is going to understand that he's had this accident. And if you re listen to the episode, at first he's kind of stuttering and stammering around a little bit, I think because he had just so expected me to start by. Could you tell me by. And then only towards the end of the interview do we get into it. And he tells his story in such a heartfelt way with so much more emotion and detail than he does in his typical public setting. For me, that really worked. We talked a lot about death. I think the episodes where we talk about death are often the ones that stick with me the most because there's so little discussion, real discussion of death. And BJ talks about death in a way that I've never heard anyone talk about it. My favorites almost always involve episodes that have a human connection because as we've been hinting at, I have very few human connections outside of this podcast. This has really been my primary way of making real connections. One of the most unexpected episodes that was really powerful for me was Wendy McNaughton. She's an artist.

[Stephen Dubner]

That was a beautiful episode. I mean, beautiful makes it sound Softer than it is, somehow. But that was a really good episode.

[Steven Levitt]

I realized as I prepared to talk to her that I hadn't talked to an artist maybe more than once in the last 20 years, and she hadn't talked to an economist, I think, in her whole life. And the meeting of the minds, I'm not exaggerating that I came out of that and I said, this is my soulmate. Which sometimes happens when you interview people. You get this deluded feeling that you're really close to them, even though they walk out and never think of you again. But then when I reached out to Wendy later, she said the same thing back. Somehow we really connected in a deep way.

[Stephen Dubner]

I remember that in the interview, you said something to her like, I see you as being not constrained by the two things that almost everybody worries about, which is that the thing that you want to do might end up taking a lot of time and it may end up not making you any money. And you said that to her, and she's like, oh, my God, nobody's ever recognized that except my therapist. And that's when I realized that you had become just a very astute interviewer. Not that you weren't always astute about the world, but there is a different component to bringing it out in someone like that.

[Steven Levitt]

A lot of this preparation. And again, I learned that from you. When you first interviewed me back 20 some years ago, you showed up my door and you had read or at least could credibly convey to me that you had read all 60 or 70 of my papers. It was shocking, and we had amazing conversations because you had invested so much. And I think that's one thing that you just can't get around.

[Stephen Dubner]

If you show someone that you care about their work, they want to talk.

[Steven Levitt]

About it, they do. There's no substitute for hard work. You can have very little talent for interviewing, but I think if you've really prepared, it can still go pretty well. I'll tell you, another interview that was really special for me was with Yuval Noah Harari. And I really, again, I stole it from you. It was an observation you had made many years ago. Yuval in general, Yuval, no, Harari is a tough nut to crack. I'd watched a lot of interviews with him, and he plays it very close to the vest, and he's really serious and sometimes argumentative. You had taught me something many years ago. You had said, the only thing that anyone ever likes to read are stories. The only good stories are about people and personalities. And you have to make it Very personal and build up the character of them and there's got to be tension and whatnot. And so what was interesting as I read his amazing book, Sapiens, there is not a character in the entire book. So he violates your first rule of storytelling. How can this book sell millions of copies when it doesn't have anything that people like? And so very early on in the interview, I took a risk and I said, hey, I loved your book, but actually I don't know why anyone else likes it because it's missing the key feature that everybody likes. And. And he had very self consciously left out any characters. It wasn't like he didn't know he did it. But I don't think any interviewer had ever brought that up. And so when I did that, I felt a complete change in his attitude. And we ended up having a really amazing open conversation. I think that's the most downloaded episode that we've ever had was that one.

[Stephen Dubner]

I think that's right. Yeah. I do remember that point he made about how when politicians get in trouble for saying something in private that could be considered offensive or whatever antisocial. He was saying, you have to let people have a private life, especially public people. I mean, that's one thing that I remember from a conversation I heard four years ago, which I think is probably on average pretty good because I remember mostly zero from a week ago.

[Steven Levitt]

He surprised me because honestly, before I interviewed him private, I wondered whether he wasn't frauds. Too strong a word. But like a faker. There are these public intellectuals who have written a book, it contains everything they know.

[Stephen Dubner]

Yeah. And if you ask them a real question, they just start dissembling. They don't actually know anything.

[Steven Levitt]

Yeah. Or you get exactly the same thing over and over.

[Stephen Dubner]

Yeah.

[Steven Levitt]

Yeah. He really surprised me because every time I asked him a question and I had read everything he had written and I had watched every interview, he would give a novel answer that was just really, really smart. Like examples you just gave that. I would stop in my tracks and say, wow, that's really. Right. Now, I don't ever like to say bad things about people, but should I make one exception just for contrast?

[Stephen Dubner]

Yeah.

[Steven Levitt]

Because I had interviewed Jared diamond before. I had talked to Yuval, and Jared Diamond, I think, fell more into that other camp where I felt like if you had read his books, then when you talk to him, he would tap into chapter seven, page 38, and he would just da, da, da, da, da. And it was really interesting to me the difference in the way those two who ostensibly are the same person in a public sense. Their books have a lot of similarities, and yet talking to them was a completely different experience.

[Stephen Dubner]

Was that a big disappointment for you.

[Steven Levitt]

That conversation, the Jared diamond one?

[Stephen Dubner]

Yeah. Did it upset you? Did you feel you wasted your time?

[Steven Levitt]

No, it was interesting for me to see see it. I've always cared a lot more about process than outcome. And so when I do an interview and it turns into an amazing episode, that feels good. But I'm also almost equally as intrigued when I do an interview and it's bad, I feel awful when it's me, I feel such a tremendous obligation to my guests. And if I do a bad job, it's very hard for me to shake. Really haunts me.

[Stephen Dubner]

What share of interviews would you say that you actually did a bad job?

[Steven Levitt]

A bunch of times I missed the boat. I'll tell you one where I didn't miss the boat, but it would eventually cause me to miss a boat on a later occasion. It was with Richard Dawkins. Richard Dawkins was an interesting interview for me. First, because he's legendary and he's such a huge thinker. The other problem is that he has written, what, 20 books? It was really hard to try to tackle his whole canon of knowledge that he had created. And the easiest and the best interviews always were with Freakonomics fans. There's this power dynamic that happens in interviews where the interviewer is way below the interviewee. And it's really hard to have a normal conversation because of that power dynamic. But because so many of the guests knew Freakonomics and liked it, we could have different kinds of conversations. Well, Richard Dawkins was not one of those people. He had no idea who I was or why he was talking to me. But over the course of 60 or 70 minutes, I surprised him enough times that by the end, he said, wait, who are you again?

[Stephen Dubner]

Didn't he then invite you to do a live event with him?

[Steven Levitt]

He did. So that felt really good to me because at the end he said, will you be the interviewer for a live event that I'm doing in Washington, dc? And that felt really great that he bestowed that honor on me. And then I totally blew it, because when we went to the live event, I really thought of it as being an extension of people I mostly admire. And my interview with him had been almost all about the science, because what's interesting to me is what he's done in science. But it turns out that the kind of people who will pay $75 to come see Richard Dawkins talk are not interested in his science. They're interested in his social ideas about atheism and whatnot. And I totally missed the boat and the entire session fell totally flat until Richard managed to successfully steer the conversation towards atheism. People started clapping and cheering. It's a horrible feeling to be sitting in an auditorium knowing that everybody is really angry at you because you're doing such a terrible job.

[Stephen Dubner]

I haven't quite had that pleasure, but I look forward to it one day. What other guests on Pima were either difficult, unfun disappointing to you?

[Steven Levitt]

I would say one of the most disappointing episodes I did, can I guess?

[Stephen Dubner]

Yeah, I'm going to say it's either Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, or maybe Avi Loeb.

[Steven Levitt]

So the two single most disappointing episodes I ever had were. You had one of them. One was Schwarzenegger and the other was Werner Herzog.

[Stephen Dubner]

Oh, really? It's just the Germans and Austrians then.

[Steven Levitt]

Both of them had no idea who I was, which was part of the problem, I think. But the Werner Herzog one was the craziest interview I ever did. Part of it got edited out. But we sat down to talk and I started asking about his movies. Of course, Werner Herzog is incredibly well known director of movies. And he said, oh, I'm not going to talk about my movies today. I'm a poet. I'm talking about my poetry. Well, unfortunately, I never read any of his poetry. I don't even know what he's talking about. So we kind of messed around for a little bit and I said, so anyway, like that reminds me in Fitzcarraldo he's like, oh, very clever, Stephen, but we are not talking about my movies today. Oh my God, that was hard work. In Schwarzenegger. It was difficult because he wouldn't put on headphones because he didn't want to mess up his hair because he was going on TV afterwards. So he couldn't hear me talking and I couldn't get him off his script. He has a script, he has a life story.

[Stephen Dubner]

He was just giving a kind of stump speech. Did you think about not publishing it then after?

[Steven Levitt]

Well, it was such a coup to get Schwarzenegger and it was so exciting. I did finally have one moment where I got him off of his stump speech, which was really fantastic. I brought up something that happened when he was running for governor of California and someone had thrown eggs at him and his suit was covered in eggs. And I'd seen the video of it and it was really fascinating. To watch because he got slammed with eggs and he didn't even change the expression on his face. He just kept on walking as if it hadn't happened. And then he went to a press conference and he gave maybe the best press conference I've ever heard in my life. Because they said, well, what about, you know, this person who threw eggs at you? And he said something like, well, I hope next time he'll throw some bacon too. So I have a whole breakfast. Who says something like that? It was awesome. And somehow in reliving that story, he changed his tone completely. So if nothing else, for that one minute of the podcast, I felt like I would not throw it away because that felt like such a triumph. You're listening to People I Mostly Admire I'm Steve Levitt. After this short break, Stephen Dubner and I will return to talk about my next podcasting gig, People I Mostly Admire is sponsored by El Mayor Tequila, a clean premium tequila that proves less is really more. Here's the deal. El Mayor is made with just three ingredients, 100% blue Weber agave water and heirloom yeast. That's it. No gimmicks, no extras, just tequila made the right way with an award winning difference. You can taste what's even better. You can often find it at half the price of other premium tequilas, which leaves plenty of room for holiday shopping. You keep it stocked and shared proudly because it's clean, smooth and always worth the pour. Think of it as your house tequila. The latest release, El Mayor Cafe Reposado, takes that same clean tequila and rests it in coffee seasoned bourbon barrels, adding a natural coffee kissed flavor. Whether you're mixing up espresso martinis for the holidays or sipping at Fireside, it's perfect for this time of year. Discover more@el mayor.com and find El Mayor at a retailer near you. Please enjoy responsibly.

[Stephen Dubner]

At LinkedIn. We know hiring is a big deal for your small business. Sometimes it can feel a little overwhelming. LinkedIn uses data that you can't find anywhere else to give you the best candidates. All so you can feel confident you're hiring the best person for the job and even a little hiring Bliss. See why 86% of small businesses who post a job on LinkedIn get a qualified candidate within a day. Post a job for [e-mail] Pandora LinkedIn. Your next great hire is here. JBL wireless earbuds are packed with innovation, Touchscreen, smart charging case for one touch control, instant EQ customization, true adaptive noise cancellation and a one Of a kind audio transmitter to plug and play from almost any source. Plus spatial 360 sound on anything. The new JBL wireless earbuds.

[Steven Levitt]

Although people I mostly admire is ending, I'm not planning on completely disappearing. That's where Stephen Dubner picks up our conversation.

[Stephen Dubner]

So I can imagine that people listening to this, to them, this sounds like all bad news in that people I mostly admire is going away. But actually there's a massive silver lining. Do you want to take it?

[Steven Levitt]

Sure. Well, I have to say, one of the frustrations with people I mostly admire is that podcasting is such a competitive world. There's so much great content out there that it's hard to get a really big audience. And it has a big audience, but nothing like your Freakonomics Radio podcast. And so you've been kind enough to say that I might have the opportunity to guest host.

[Stephen Dubner]

Oh, it wasn't kindness, it's exhaustion. I'm like, please come in, help. No, seriously, I just want to say when we started having this conversation about you maybe shutting down Pima and starting to do whatever, a handful of episodes of Freakonomics Radio a year. Who knows how many it might be? It coincided with me really wanting to, you know, it's a weekly show, Freakonomics Radio, which is really hard to do. High quality all the time, and I do love it, but it's grueling and exhausting sometimes. So I think this is like getting the band back together 20 years after we wrote the first book. I mean, selfishly for me, I think it's great. But also editorially, I don't mean to flatter you so much, but I'm just really impressed with what a good interviewer you've become over the past five years doing people I mostly admire. So I think you're gonna make great Freakonomics Radio episodes. Do you wanna just give a preview of one or two that you're working on already?

[Steven Levitt]

I'd more like to keep those secret, actually. I think it's better to keep em secret. But let me say this. What I love about the format of Freakonomics Radio is that you tackle issues and policy. And maybe there is a way in this long form interview Pima format of actually trying to make headway on policy. But I never figured out how to do it.

[Stephen Dubner]

I agree with you. I feel like there are two basic types of conversation. One is about a person and one is about a thing. And yeah, you can knit them in, but it's hard sometimes.

[Steven Levitt]

I have a handful of policy ideas that I think are really important. And I love the idea of pursuing them through the Freakonomics Radio format with the hope that really I can make an impact. For example, AI in education. We talked for one minute in this episode today about AI and education, but I think it's a really important issue that isn't being treated in the right way. And because of these two very different camps, people who think AI is the best thing in the world, people think AI is the worst thing in the world. Understanding how it is both at the same time, but in a really sensible and thoughtful way, I think that's the kind of message I want to have people talking about. There's just gross mistakes that we're making in terms of the incentives that we're applying to, say, pharmaceutical development. There's stories to tell there that matter. I don't think of myself as a journalist at all. So what I have done at Pima, I don't think of that as journalism. I think of that as just me having conversations with people. What you do on Freakonomics Radio is actually journalism, and I'm excited to try my hand at being a journalist for a little while.

[Stephen Dubner]

I think it's going to be great for Freakonomics Radio. I think it's going to be great for me. I hope it's great for you. I think it's going to be great for listeners. Listen, you did a wonderful job last five years with people I mostly admire. So congratulations, and thanks for letting yourself be talked into it.

[Steven Levitt]

Well, you know, one thing I'm glad is I finally quit something on time because I always wait until too long like everybody else does. And when people say, have you ever quit something at the right time? I'm going to say, well, I might have quit too early, but at least I didn't wait too long. Even though I know it's the right thing to do, it's still hard to say goodbye to this podcast. In recent weeks, we asked you, the listeners, to send us voice memos about particular episodes of the podcast that affected your lives. I was so moved by the hundreds of kind messages we've received. Such a beautiful reminder of the community of smart, thoughtful people that this podcast created. I would have liked to play all of them for you, but in the end, we made some really tough choices and we settled on four to share. Here they are.

[Stephen Dubner]

Hi, Steve Morgan and the Pima crew. This is Yvonne from Oxford in the uk. I am, as expected, devastated by the end of People I Mostly Admire. It's one of my most shared podcasts and I've sent random episodes to all all sorts of different people with the strap line. I thought you might find this really interesting. After scrolling through all the episodes, I would say Richard Thaler was such a great combo of educational and entertaining and just seemed like a really nice guy. But of all the episodes I use advice the most from Charles Duhigg who has helped me think about what people want from conversations and I think if someone might be ranting or angry, I always try and figure out if they want to be heard, helped or hugged. Whilst I'm really sad Pima is over. I wish you guys all the best with your next venture. I'm sure whatever you do will be absolutely amazing.

[Steven Levitt]

Hi Steven Morgan, this is David Reedman. Episode 27 Daniel Kahneman on why our Judgment is Flawed and what to do about it became the foundation for my PhD dissertation. Kahneman talked about his book Noise, which is the variability in human judgment, and I took Kahneman's concept of a noise audit, which is measuring the aggregate variability in a group, and use this to evaluate how school police officers assess threats of violence at K12 schools. I then did a second noise audit of large language models assessing the same decisions and compared the variance in humans versus AI assessments. Thank you so much for the interview with Kahneman. Without it, I never would have known where to start. Hi Steve and Morgan, this is Madison in New York State. I've been a longtime fan of the podcast an episode and a piece of Advice that changed my life was the first episode you did with Sendhil Muli Nathan. You guys talked about Sendhil's observation that people tend to become like those that they spent a lot of time with. And he had had students who were like, I'm gonna go into consulting but not become like those people people. And then they did and that really stuck with me. And actually within a year of listening to that episode, I left a role in consulting because I found myself looking around and realizing I did not really want the lives of the people around me and that just wasn't going to make me happy. And within a year I was working full time at a small locally owned gym where the people were very different than me on their resumes, but we valued similar things and they were changing people's lives in ways that I really admired. And four years later, I'm a lot more like those people at the gym and I'm grateful for it. So thank you. Oh, I'm going to miss people I mostly admire. Steve, your genuine thoughtfulness and curiosity brought out the the best in people who were all very unique and yet totally inspiring and uplifting. So Steve, you were great in this.

[Stephen Dubner]

Studio and thank you for letting me.

[Steven Levitt]

In on the conversations.

[Stephen Dubner]

But enough talking. I know you're going to do great.

[Steven Levitt]

Things outside the studio. Maybe that's why I mostly admire you. That was Diana Choquette from New South Wales. Thank you again listeners for your voice memos, your emails, and your loyalty over the years. I also want to thank my producer Morgan, who's been with the show since almost the very beginning and who really made it what it was. Starting in the new year, we'll be replaying the entire archive of people I mostly admire, starting from the beginning in the podcast feed and keep checking the Freakonomics Radio feed. My first Freakonomics Radio episode will likely be coming out in January or February of 2026 and if you want to be in touch, I still plan on reading every email we receive at Our email address Pima P I M A doreekonomics.com thanks again for being part of something that has been so, so special to me.

[Stephen Dubner]

People I mostly admire is part of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which also includes.

[Steven Levitt]

Freakonomics Radio and the Economics of Everyday Things.

[Stephen Dubner]

All our shows are produced by Stitcher and Renbud Radio.

[Steven Levitt]

This episode was produced by Morgan Levy.

[Stephen Dubner]

And mixed by Greg Rippon.

[Steven Levitt]

Our theme music was composed by Luis Guerra.

[Stephen Dubner]

We can be reached @pimaeconomic that's P.

[Steven Levitt]

I M [e-mail] thanks for listening. Is this real?

[Stephen Dubner]

Oh yeah.

[Steven Levitt]

The Freakonomics Radio Network the Hidden side of Everything. Stitcher.

[Stephen Dubner]

Drafty windows, sky high energy bills Tired of the hassle of constant repairs this holiday season, Renewal by Andersen helps you slay the savings. Buy one window or door and get one 40% off plus take 200 off your entire purchase with a minimum of four and with special financing available. Replacing those old inefficient windows has never been easier. Don't let drafty, worn out windows crash your holiday cheer. Visit renewalbyanderson.com today to schedule your free consultation at LinkedIn. We know hiring is a big deal for your small business. Sometimes it can feel a little overwhelming. LinkedIn uses data that you can't find anywhere else to give you the best candidates. All so you can feel confident you're hiring the best person for the job and even a little hiring Bliss. See why 86% of small businesses who post a job on LinkedIn get a qualified candidate within a day. Post a job for [e-mail] Pandora LinkedIn your next great hire is here. JBL Wireless Earbuds are packed with innovation. Touchscreen smart charging, case for one touch control, instant EQ customization, true adaptive noise cancellation and a one of a kind audio transmitter to plug and play from Almost any source plus spatial 360 sound on anything. The new JVL wireless earbuds.