← Piers Morgan Uncensored
Piers Morgan Uncensored
"There Were NO Talks!" Trump Calls Off Iran Deadline on Strait of Hormuz
01:15:06
Loading summary
Transcript191 lines
- [00:00]
Anthony Scaramucci
Quick break. One useful thing to share. I thought TikTok was just dances. Turns out it's where I learned how to save money, fix stuff and get real tips. Short videos, real people download TikTok now.
- [00:16]
Brian McGuinness
They want very much to make a deal. We'd like to make a deal too.
- [00:20]
Piers Morgan
Otherwise we'd just keep bombing our little hearts out.
- [00:23]
Hogan Gidley
My guess is he's working on himself to find a way to pull out of this thing and claim some type of victory, which of course he will do.
- [00:31]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
We're not going to allow him to walk away, rearm himself, prepare himself, and then launch another attack six months from now, a year from now.
- [00:38]
Anthony Scaramucci
Some people think this military operation is going to make Iran more radical and more angry. That's insanity.
- [00:45]
Brian McGuinness
No one wants to fight for Israel. I still feel very concerned about what we're committing American troops to couple the cause.
- [00:55]
Anthony Scaramucci
We are.
- [00:55]
Brian McGuinness
It's for the Greater Israel Project. And a key aspect of that project is to weaken the West.
- [01:00]
Goldie Gamari
There's so much craziness that I just heard, I don't even know where to begin. Do not interrupt when I'm speaking. I let you speak. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking.
- [01:11]
Piers Morgan
The media expends a lot of energy talking about the influence of Netanyahu's Israeli government on presidential decision making. It's increasingly clear that the invisible force of a stock market wields equally outsized sway. President Trump famously waited for the markets to close for the weekend before announcing war on Iran. And when the Dow Jones index plunged 900 points two Mondays ago, he called CBS to declare that the war was very complete. Just in time for the markets to rally before closing. This weekend, he imposed a chilling 48 hour deadline for Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz or face the total obliteration of its energy facilities. This morning, with gas heading up and stocks heading down, the President said the strikes were off for at least five days. An all cap statement on true social held the very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East. The five day delay would of course take us up to the closure of the market on Friday. And the President was talking up the chances of a full ceasefire, including Israel, a couple of hours ago.
- [02:15]
Brian McGuinness
If these talks go well and you reach a ceasefire agreement with Iran, do you believe Israel would abide by that agreement? I think Israel will be very happy with what we have. We just spoke to Israel a little while ago. I think they'll be very happy. This will be peace for Israel long term. Peace, guaranteed peace. If this happens, and, you know, I can't guarantee it, but I think it's going to. My life is a deal. That's all I do is deals my whole life. I think this is something that's going to happen. And why wouldn't it happen?
- [02:48]
Piers Morgan
Well, for its part, Iran is taking a victory lap. A state news agency denied there's been any contact with Trump and says the US Backed down because it threatened to hit targets across West Asia and unleash economic chaos. All of this after Iran tried and failed to hit a US UK base in the Indian Ocean, leading to speculation that its bombs could reach as far as Britain. Well, whether we're really any closer to a total resolution is extremely unclear. It's hard to see how Trump can declare any kind of victory right now. The regime may be weakened, but it's unchanged and remains in charge. Far from complying with the US And Israeli demands, they're still bombing Israel, is still able to throttle the Strait of Hormuz and is still sitting on uranium stockpiles. If the best case scenario is that the same regime staggers on but reopens the strait and pauses, its nuclear program will be roughly where we were before the $20 billion war began. Any side crowing about victory will be Iran, whether the markets like it or not. It's hard to see how President Trump will settle for that. Well, to debate all this, I'm joined by Anthony Scaramucci, the former White House communications director and host of the Rest Is Politics, US Hogan Gidley, the former White House deputy press secretary in Trump's first term and senior adviser at Power US Brian McGuinness, the US Marine Corps veteran turned anti war protester and Green candidate for Senate, and Goldie Gamari, the former Canadian MP and host of the Goldie Show. Well, welcome to all of you. Anthony Scaramucci, welcome back to Uncensored. Been listening to your stuff on Rest Is Politics, us So I know where you come from here. I got to say, I've been really struggling. Normally, I can see the logic of Trump's big moves. I may be distracted by the rhetoric and some of the contradictory things that he says, but I can normally see an underlying logic. I'm really struggling with the attack on Iran and particularly with its timing just a few months before the midterm elections. And the reasons I've been struggling, I think, have become crystal clear the longer it's gone on is that none of the original war aims appear to have been achieved. And now it looks like Whilst it can't compete militarily, Iran has been very, very adept at competing economically by controlling the Strait of Hormuz. But 20% of the world's oil comes through every day. And by attacking its Gulf State neighbors, both in its refineries and also in tourist areas, which has had the effect of scaring the hell out of them and the people that may want to live there. I don't, I just don't see how any of this constitutes any kind of victory as things stand. And yet I also think there's an impending urgent need for Donald Trump to, to somehow get out of this. And if that means he declares a Pyrrhic victory, will, so be it.
- [05:40]
Hogan Gidley
I think, I mean, let's be fair to the President for a second and let's go to the logic side of this thing. I think the pitch to him was this is a six day war, a 12 day war. This will happen very quickly, will hit them very hard. And the Mossad told him that there would be capitulation and regime change as a result of riots in the streets and overwhelming the irgc. And so that didn't happen. And I obviously asked around, and you're a terrific journalist, Pierce. You've asked around. I think the Mossad really miscalculated on this. I don't think they were misleading the President. So now you're into the second phase of this where I think your illogic starts to happen, because what he originally thought was going to happen, and he also said this, he, he tipped everybody off a few weeks ago where he said, well, I didn't expect, or none of us expected the Iranians to hit the Gulf allies. And, and, you know, he thought this was going to be like the 12 Day War last June where there would be some retaliation, but it would be measured. So you're now in that overtime period where my guess is he's working on himself to find a way to pull out of this thing and claim some type of victory, which of course he will do, no matter what happens here, no matter how bad it is. Just like when he lost a debate to Kamala Harris in September of 2024. He'll, he'll claim victory. But, but I think there's the logic, you know, the, the, the intelligence briefings were wrong, and now he's stressed out about how to end the thing.
- [07:16]
Piers Morgan
Hogan Giddy, welcome to Uncensored. I think, I think the last time I physically saw you was in the bowels of the Churchill war rooms in London.
- [07:24]
Anthony Scaramucci
Churchill's bunker.
- [07:25]
Piers Morgan
Yep. Yeah. I was just thinking that when I interviewed President Trump in his last term, and it was a great interview, actually. And he ended up, I gave him one of Churchill's hats as a souvenir, which he loved. But, you know, an ironic setting for our last meeting because, of course, he's been saying that Keir Starmer's no Churchill because he hasn't stepped up in the way he wants the UK to step up and so on. You know, you were a former Trump White House press Aiden. One of the big, big problems I have with what's been going on is the, is the really contradictory messaging that's been coming out here, not just from President Trump, but a lot of his senior aides. You know, I mean, to what Anthony just said. We all heard what came out of Marco Rubio's mouth when he was asked, why did the United States attack preemptively? And he said, because Israel had told. He didn't name Israel, it's obvious he was talking about another country, had indicated they were about to attack Iran, and therefore Iran would respond by attacking American assets, and therefore we had to get in first, which sounded at the time incredibly convoluted. And then there was a big reining back on that and so on. But, you know, as we sit here to debate this, very little of what we were told at the start of this war would be the immediate after effects of it has happened. We see no rioting on the streets at all. There are a number of reasons. Obvious ones are bombs flying over the streets. Obviously, a lot of protesters were killed in January, and it's quite clear that the regime remains in charge and that the IRGC remain in control of the people. Otherwise they probably would be out rioting. So none of these things to me make a lot of sense. Make some sense of it for me. If you're in the Trump White House right now, what does tell me, I mean, General Petraeus wrote a book called How Does It End?
- [09:15]
Anthony Scaramucci
Right.
- [09:16]
Piers Morgan
And that should be the question he said, you asked when you launch every war, how does this end and what does actual victory look like?
- [09:25]
Anthony Scaramucci
Well, listen, I think there are a lot of factors here that go into these planning military operations. As you know, as you mentioned, I was in that first administration and we gained these things out top to bottom with all the brilliant top brass from every single branch of the military to find out what could potentially happen. These things are all gamed out in real time. The President of the United States, though, I think, did clearly state at the beginning of this what he wanted to accomplish, and he has largely accomplished that. You have many people on the right saying this is done, so go ahead and get out now. And they were clear you did not want Iran to get a nuclear weapon. That's virtually impossible now. Even after bombing the Fordo plant about a year ago, they began to rebuild almost in instantaneously. He's knocked that out. He wanted to get rid of the ballistic missile capability. He's done that in large measure as well. And he doesn't want them to have enough money to fund terrorist proxies all over the world. That's in process as well. So there are some clear victories here that Donald Trump outlined at the outset and has accomplished. The question always is, how long are you going to stay there and what do you want to happen after you accomplish the things you state you want accomplished? And those things have been done. So for me, you mentioned the people in the streets. Will they rise up and try and take back their government? I sure hope so because There are what, 90 million people there? Those folks should be the ones out there chanting in the streets and getting rid of the IRJC, etc. I don't know if that's going to happen, but let's be clear here as well. Whether you want this thing to have happened on the front end or whether you didn't. Largely the perception or the opinion of this military action will be dictated by whether or not people view it as a win or a loss. And if the wins are racking up and you can put someone in place there that you can actually talk to and negotiate with in Iran to allow them to be kind of a burgeoning economic hub, if you will, or someone that doesn't slaughter its people at the first sign of anger, then I think that will be a win that the American people will understand and root for.
- [11:36]
Brian McGuinness
If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H VAC and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.
- [12:06]
Piers Morgan
Being quite optimistic, I think it might be a win that the MAGA hardcore Trump base will go along with. But I think the problem for Donald Trump is going to be certainly electorally in the midterm elections. I think there'll be A lot of people who are on the more moderate side of the Republican party or independents have voted for him in the general election who are just not happy about this. And all the polling shows are not happy about this. Let me bring in.
- [12:33]
Anthony Scaramucci
That depends on the outcome. Pierce.
- [12:34]
Piers Morgan
Yeah, but you see, I mean, Goldie, I'll come to you in a second. The thing is, Hogan, I would say to what you said now, you said, okay, the nuclear capabilities been pretty much ended except we were told that had happened last summer. That was the whole point of a 12 day war. And then it turned out within 10
- [12:49]
Anthony Scaramucci
days they began to rebuild it.
- [12:50]
Piers Morgan
Right, but why can't they do that again would be the obvious question. They can, right? They could do it then, they can do it again. Secondly, the ballistic missiles being neutralized, they're still firing them and in fact they're going a lot further than anyone believes possible because the Iranians clearly were lying about their capability. But when they start to reach distances, as two did last week, which means they could potentially get to European cities like London and Paris and so on, that doesn't say to me that their ballistic capability has been neutralized. It says to me it's alive and kicking and a lot more dangerous potentially than we realize Now a lot of it may have been destroyed, but clearly they are still firing a lot of missiles around. And I think the idea that somehow we've ended that we can walk away and they won't have any ability to rebuild any of that stuff, I think is for the birds.
- [13:46]
Anthony Scaramucci
Well, it depends on again who's installed to run the place. I mean, I think that's kind of the position moving forward. But yeah, they have missiles, of course they do. And I don't know if we were aware of how many they had, but they're greatly diminished, if not completely eradicated, sans a few here or there. But I mean, that's what the whole point of this military operation was set to do. They're not talking about regime change, although they do.
- [14:11]
Piers Morgan
Well, they did talk about regime change.
- [14:14]
Anthony Scaramucci
Someone new there they can negotiate with.
- [14:16]
Hogan Gidley
Well, not.
- [14:17]
Piers Morgan
But they did repeatedly talk about regime changes. I mean, that's where I again would question you is like Donald Trump talked about regime change very early on. He doesn't talk about it so much now because it's quite clear the regime ain't changing. The leader's been decapitated and so have many of the other leaders, but there are plenty more where they came from. You know, it doesn't look like the ayatollah son may even still be alive. We don't know. We haven't seen him or heard from him. It seems very suspicious to me. But the IRGC are clearly still firmly in control of the country. So this idea, the regime has certainly not been toppled. And I don't know who this moderate Iranian Islamist regime change guy is going to be, but I don't see many of them around.
- [15:02]
Anthony Scaramucci
Well, because he got rid of them. But the one he's talking about in the clip you just played, that's interesting to me because it's obvious Donald Trump decided. Okay, hold on. I'm going to pause this for a minute to see if this negotiation can actually move forward and we can come to some type of an agreement here. And as you point out, with the missile capability potentially being able to hit places like Paris and London, it also makes you wonder, when are these other nations going to step up and join in as well and say, now, wait a minute, we didn't know you could attack us. Now that threat's on the table, maybe we should actually join with our partner at ally US and do some more maneuvers to protect our interests as well.
- [15:38]
Piers Morgan
Okay, Goldie Gamari, welcome back to Uncensored. The. I guess the, the big question is, people keep asking me, why has there been no uprising so far in Iran? And how much of the agenda do you think is being driven by the Israelis, who have maybe a completely different agenda to the Americans? I think the Israelis will be quite happy just to have general chaos in Iran, whereas general chaos for the Americans would be a bit like the general chaos we saw in Iraq after Saddam fell, which was it led to the rise of ISIS and many attacks on American troops and so on, and was a complete fiasco and disaster. So you've got competing agendas by competing countries here.
- [16:22]
Goldie Gamari
Well, first of all, thanks for having me on, Pierce. Great to be back. So with respect to why people haven't risen up yet, the answer is very simple. It's simply not the time. The United States is saying this. CENTCOM is saying this. Israel is saying this. The crown prince of Iran, Reza Pahlav, he's a leader of the Iranian revolution. He's saying this as well. In fact, General Cooper did an interview yesterday with Iran International, and even yesterday he was saying now is not the time for the Iranian people to go to the streets. When the time is right, when the United States has finished their military operation, we will let them know. The signal will be very clear. And at that point, Iranians can go to the streets to rise up and, and take their country back. So, I mean, that's the very clear and simple answer to that. With respect to your question about Israel, I'm a little confused about where you came up with the premise for that question. These last 47 years, the only country that has really stood behind the Iranian people against the Islamic regime has been Israel. And, I mean, Israel has been the one true friend of the Iranian people. And, you know, now we have America on our side as well, thanks to President Trump and his administration. But we're very grateful for all of this that's happening. And, you know, with respect to what President Trump is doing right now, he made it very clear at the beginning he wants nothing less than unconditional surrender. So what I think is happening here is President Trump is setting up these negotiations, in a way, for this. You know, if it actually is Khaliba, he's setting it up so that Khaliba can surrender. And then once Galiboff and whatever leadership is left surrenders, that's when I believe he's gonna give the signal to the Iranian people to go back and reclaim the country, because the IRGC will not fight back. That's how I see this playing out.
- [18:18]
Piers Morgan
Okay, Brian McGuinness, welcome to Uncensored. Now, you served in the United States marine Corps from 2000 to 2004. You opposed this war, and in fact, you were forcefully removed from a Senate hearing after shouting, nobody wants to fight for Israel. We've got a clip here, actually. Had your arm broken, I believe, in the process of your protest here. Have we got that clip. Out?
- [18:49]
Brian McGuinness
No one wants to fight for Israel.
- [18:54]
Anthony Scaramucci
His hand. His hand.
- [18:56]
Piers Morgan
Oh, okay, sir. A US Senator just broke the hand of a Marine.
- [19:11]
Anthony Scaramucci
A US Senator just broke the hand of a Marine. You're a coward.
- [19:16]
Shushank Joshi
Hung out.
- [19:21]
Piers Morgan
That's why you got kicked out. Badass. So, Brian, first of all, how are you, and was your arm actually broken?
- [19:28]
Brian McGuinness
Well, my arm was stuck between those two doors, and as you can see from the video, my arm broke. Not trying to talk about it too much because I'm in the middle of the legal process, but I would really like to be able to share my sentiments related to that protest of mine. I still feel, you know, very concerned about what. We're committing American troops to the cause.
- [19:50]
Hogan Gidley
We are.
- [19:51]
Brian McGuinness
It's for the Greater Israel Project. And a key aspect of that project is to weaken the west so Israel can be the dominant power in the Middle East. Our bases over there are getting hit with missiles, killing 13Americans so far, erasing American presence while elevating Israel's dominance and we're spending $2 billion a day increasing our national debt, all while attacking a country Joe Kent clearly stated pose no imminent threat and that we're doing it because of Israel's influence bringing our tax dollars back to the Americans who pay them. Instead, the investor class, which includes the Epstein class, profit while the working class watch their sons and daughters, moms and dads, go fight for Israel. Israelis believe they're God's chosen while our elected officials send them our troops and treasure. I believe this is wrong and America doesn't want this.
- [20:36]
Piers Morgan
I mean, look, there are lots of people who say a similar version of what you just said. And as I said, what Marco Rubio said clearly pointed to a lot of Israeli influence on this decision to attack Iran. But other people say, look, United States is the biggest superpower in the history of planet Earth. Donald Trump is not a shrinking violet. These decisions were made by America and Donald Trump because they also believed it was in the interests of the United States. I mean, I think that is probably true. It doesn't mean there wasn't influence or encouragement by the Israelis to go along with it. But ultimately, the responsibility for American involvement surely lies with the United States and the President, doesn't it?
- [21:19]
Brian McGuinness
I think it's a bad idea to believe Donald Trump, a businessman, a man of poor character, over Joe Kent, the national counterintelligence director. And he specifically stated why he resigned because he got in good faith, continue to support this war that does not as against Iran. That not they did not pose any imminent threats and it was caused by Israeli lobby influence.
- [21:43]
Piers Morgan
Okay, just hold five panel for a moment and be joined now by Shushank Joshi. He's the defense editor at the Economist. Welcome to Uncensored. I need you to do what I've been struggling to do, which is make some kind of sense about all the strategy here, this going on. I mean, take our own country, for example. Initially, the UK Prime Minister said, well, we're not going to allow even the bases that we share with the Americans to be used. Then within 30, 36 hours, complete U turn on that. Now, I think they can use some of the bases, but only if it's for defensive and not aggressive reasons. Not quite sure how you take part in defensive bombing. I'm sure someone can explain it to me. So that's just the UK and you've got similar kind of contradictory positions a lot of other countries, too. What is happening here? I mean, from a defense perspective. What is going on? Yeah, good afternoon.
- [22:38]
Shushank Joshi
Should I start with The UK side. Does that make sense? I think what's happening is that the belief in government is this is a really needless, counterproductive and harmful war that is destroying the global economy and will result in Iran perhaps emerging more ideological, more radical and more of a threat than it did before. But of course, they can't say that, because they also, quite understandably, like any Prime Minister, have the relationship with the United States to manage. And the United States is the most important ally of the uk, whoever it's led by. It's absolutely critical to our defence capabilities, our intelligence cooperation, not to mention our nuclear deterrent. And so you've got to manage that relationship. And so whilst they think it's a terrible war and a terrible idea, and that bombing Iranian forces even along the Persian Gulf coastline will not open the Strait of Hormuz, only a end to the conflict will reopen Hormuz. They nonetheless have to be seen to be cooperative. And that's why I think you have Mark Rutter, the Secretary General of NATO, insisting Europeans are in support of this, when he knows, of course, they aren't. This is very simple. You might call it cynical diplomacy, but equally, you could argue that it's fairly pragmatic management of an alliance.
- [23:50]
Piers Morgan
And in terms of the. The way that the American and Israeli combined military have gone about this, do you think they really underestimated the way that the Iranians would respond so adeptly in terms of strangling the global economy? By using the Strait of Hormuz as a weapon in the way that they have, by effectively closing it to all but a little bit of oil. But secondly, by attacking the Gulf State neighbors in the way that they have, including attacking refineries, including attacking tourist spots and so on. Do you think they just dropped the ball a bit here, the intelligence from America and Israel, in terms of what was going to come back at them? Because it does seem extraordinary they've been taken extraordinarily by surprise, if that is the case.
- [24:37]
Shushank Joshi
Yeah. First of all, I think anyone competent in the US intelligence community would have fully recognize the risk of Iran both striking dull states and also closing Hormuz in the event that this was a war of regime change, of killing Ayatollah Khamenei, killing the leadership, bombing infrastructure. That's not like the previous wars, of course. That's not like Operation Midnight Hammer last year, where only Iranian nuclear sites were struck. And so in a more dangerous situation, the regime would be desperate and would respond in a desperate and quite effective fashion. But I think actually Pierce it's even more canny from the Iranians than you've said, because not only have they succeeded in closing off most of the traffic to Hormuz, what they've also done, in a way that I think many experts even didn't anticipate, is allowing Hormuz to be used for their own tankers. They've managed to get their own tankers out. I mean, don't Forget, just nearly 100 tankers have left the Persian Gulf since February 28, including tankers of oil being sold to the Chinese and to the Indians. And so they've, in a way, got the best of both worlds, shutting off this flow, causing turmoil in global energy markets, whilst also applying pressure and continuing to get revenue for themselves. So I think there's been an enormous failure here of statecraft, and I think that's really why you're seeing Donald Trump try to scramble around for means to try to reopen Hormuz by military ways, that is sending Marines to the region by trying to look at the potential occupation of Hog island, but ultimately realizing, as you've seen, I think, in the last 12 hours, that there is a diplomatic way that will be much easier and quicker and frankly, much more viable in getting himself out of this rather difficult situation he's got himself in.
- [26:18]
Piers Morgan
Right. I mean, he's, I suspect, looking at Donald Trump's behavior and his rhetoric, that he's urgently looking for some kind of off ramp, but isn't entirely sure what one would look like, which gives him a plausible victory or one, indeed, that the Iranians would allow to happen. I mean, what do you think is the most realistic way this all ends?
- [26:39]
Shushank Joshi
Well, you know, you're absolutely right. I think part of that is an off ramp of the Hormuz. That is, if this war ends now with Iran successfully in control of Hormuz, I think that looks like a defeat for Donald Trump. So part one of any off ramp has to be some kind of settlement in which Trump is seen to have reopened Hormuz by diplomacy. And, of course, the Iranians will only do that in exchange for some kind of concessions. Concessions, for example, about not being attacked again, concessions about the future of their nuclear program. Concessions, I think, most of all, which may appeal to Donald Trump on sanctions relief, on future Iranian sanctions. But the other thing here, Piers, is the reason America launched this war, ostensibly, or so it says, is Iran's nuclear program. There is still, as you know, 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium sitting under the rubble in Fordeaux as well as Isfahan. And it was Something called the uranium conversion facility. And in Natanz, as long as that material is sat there, if Donald Trump ends the war with Iran in control of that material, which is enough for about 10 nuclear bombs, again, that will look like a very odd sort of victory. And so any deal, any off ramp will, must also cater for that nuclear material. But Iran will demand a price. And I'm not sure whether Donald Trump is ready to pay that price, which is why I think the odds of an end to this now are still no better than 5050.
- [28:00]
Piers Morgan
And it's already the biggest seismic shock to global energy we've ever seen. And the after effects of that could reverberate for many months. I mean, I'm told that once you close the Strait of Hormuz in the way that's been closed for a few weeks, it can take months for that to properly play out in world food supplies and so on. So we could see real big spikes in food prices, in inflation and so on coming in the next few months. But if this was to escalate or just continue in the way that it is for, say, two, three, four more months, how bad will this get for the global economy?
- [28:38]
Shushank Joshi
Well, if it goes on for several more weeks, you'll see oil at $150 a barrel. But it's not just oil, I think, as you very sensibly point out, it's about all the other commodities flowing through the Strait of Hormuz. And that includes things like fertilizer products, it includes aluminium products, it includes certain types of critical minerals used in manufacturing, in the semiconductor industry as well. So there will be knock on effect, perhaps not at the same level as those we saw in the supply chain shock of COVID but approaching that level. And what really interests me, and you know, I'm not a political expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the downstream political impact of all of this, including in the United States, where petrol prices have gone up. Donald Trump, of course, as you know, is six months away from midterm elections. We know that the American electorate is always sensitive to input prices of petrol, gasoline, as they call it. And whilst they enjoy considerably lower costs than we do here in Europe, they are still very conscious of how this affects their checkbook. And poor Americans, as you know, drive much, much more than poor Europeans. So they are hit relatively harder by the impact of these shocks. With the midterms approaching, I think a lot of people around Donald Trump will be saying you are already in a difficult position going into the midterms and your prospect of holding on to the House and the Senate. What does this do to those prospects? And for that reason, while I'm not confident on an end to this conflict in the next week, I do think it's very unlikely this goes on beyond the end of April because the costs for Donald Trump, economically and politically, forget about those to us here in Europe and to those in Asia, Pakistan is running out of lng, for example, are very high.
- [30:15]
Piers Morgan
Yeah. Susan Joshi, thank you very much indeed for joining me. I appreciate it.
- [30:19]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Thank you.
- [30:20]
Piers Morgan
Let's go back to the panel. As you, Scaramucci, you did one of the shortest but probably most famous 10 years speaking for Donald Trump from the press podium. How do you spin your way out of this? I mean, what is given how potentially cataclysmic it is politically, never mind anything else. But what would you be advising him right now?
- [30:44]
Hogan Gidley
Well, first of all, I just want to point out on Friday night, Hogan said I was there for 10 days. But Pierce, I was actually there for 11 days.
- [30:51]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
I remember that Hogan, don't let Hogan
- [30:53]
Hogan Gidley
get away with that on this pot.
- [30:55]
Piers Morgan
He diminished your standing in a shocking manner.
- [30:59]
Hogan Gidley
I think it was generally unfair of Hogan to do that to me. But if I, if I were with the president and I would say, listen, get it down to three things that in your mind makes this a success. What are those three things? And then when we get to those three things, I would declare victory as quickly as possible. But as your prior guest pointed out, it's complicated because they're controlling that. Straight. And so what I'm worried about, because I understand the president's personality, you've got 4,400 Marines in the Marine Expeditionary Forces, two different groups heading for the area. And I know he's been briefed on this, that, you know, one of the ways to clear out that strait is to put ground forces, US Ground forces in the area, try to clean up the situation. And so I'm praying that that doesn't happen because I think that's an escalation trap for the United States. But again, for me, I would tell the president, pick one or two things, pin your hat on that and let's go home.
- [32:05]
Piers Morgan
What's the best thing he could pin it on?
- [32:09]
Hogan Gidley
Well, I think the best, the best thing is that you, you, they're not if you thought they were a threat, I know Joe Kent said that they weren't, but the president obviously thought that they were. But do you now not think that they are a threat? Have they been sufficiently degraded? And if that, that answer is yes. Then I think it's time to go home and then we can begin the process of diplomatic negotiation. You know, listen, there's, there's one avenue here that I really would love the President to pursue because he is a dealmaker. One avenue would be, and it's a more nuanced avenue, but to go to the Iranians and say, okay, we've got you degraded. Let's open the strait together, let's get your oil back on the market, which would be very good for the global economy. I don't think the Israelis are going to like that one, but I do think that, that that's an avenue, given his deal making chops peers, that's an avenue I would like to see him pursue.
- [33:04]
Piers Morgan
Hogan. We keep an eye on the prediction markets and polymarket has been asking, will the traffic in the Strait of Hormuz return to normal by the end of April? And there's currently a 36% chance, they think for the money that's come in, that that will happen. Do you think that's realistic? I mean, if you listen to the experts, the longer this straight up Hormuz remains effectively closed, the more damaging everything gets for the global. Never mind just American economy. Do you think that will be a priority of President Trump to just get it open come what may?
- [33:40]
Anthony Scaramucci
Yeah, of course. Listen, a couple of things that have happened in the last 10 minutes I do want to address here. Joe Kent being against this. Sure. But he was for it before, so it's kind of a. Mitt Romney. I was for it before, I was against the thing with him. Second is your journalist you just talked to, Pierce, made the point that some people think this military operation is going to make Iran more radical and more angry. That's insanity. They already want to kill everyone that isn't of their belief. They already want global domination and destruction. And it'd be like when you and I were in that bunker and World War II was happening and you were saying, we don't wanna really fight Germany because after all, they'll hate Jews more. Like they're already killing them. That's insanity. They're the world's largest global sponsor of terrorism. And everyone from Hillary Clinton to Kamala Harris to Joe Biden to Barack Obama, all have said that Iran can't get a nuclear weapon. Donald Trump's the only one really doing something to prevent that from happening. And at the same time, the journalist you just brought on said, but they have all this nuclear material in these different locations. Okay, are we going to do something about that? Was he advocating that we should just allow them to keep it when that regime was in power? We know the death and destruction they caused all over the globe, whether through proxies or whether through their own capabilities. Diminishing that is important. But here at home, understand, cost is what matters to the American people. And while the American left will say it's all about affordability, I kind of find that a fake term. Because what's affordable to you, Piers Morgan, as wealthy as you are, not probably affordable to me. But is the cost up or is the cost coming down? That's what matters. And if Donald Trump's military operation here brings down the cost of oil, brings down the cost of gasoline here in this country and around the globe, that's the victory. In addition, of course, to preventing them from getting a nuclear weapon and causing terrorist threats all over the world and chaos. Bringing that rational, responsible, strategic use and flow of oil through that strait is what's going to matter here eventually, I think, to the American electorate and how they decided.
- [35:56]
Piers Morgan
Well, it is. But of course, the damage may well have been done, and it will have been done by Donald Trump's decision to attack Iran in the first place, which led to it closing. So, you know, people aren't that stupid. I mean, they're going to think, well, you know, if in the end, it's a messy ending to this, where really any plausible victory is kind of laughed at, not least by the Iranians, if they're all still in power there, then, you know, it's hard to see how you can spin rising inflation, rising cost of living prices, rising gas pump prices in weeks and months of pain to the American electorate. I don't know quite how you square that with, well, now they've come down again, therefore I'm the hero.
- [36:38]
Anthony Scaramucci
Well, they were at record highs under the previous administration, under Joe Biden, of course, and Donald Trump brought them down. This, as your journalist just mentioned, would make prices spike. $150 per barrel or more. They predicted that as well. Now they're way less than that. Of course, these experts are typically wrong. The question, though, is even if the costs come down, how do the Americans feel about it?
- [37:00]
Piers Morgan
Right.
- [37:00]
Anthony Scaramucci
And that's something that's very difficult to quantify. So, you know, if the price spikes by $2 and then you bring it down $1.50, it's still $0.50 higher than it was before, but still way lower than it ever was under Joe Biden, Then it's a whole messaging conversation and messaging war moving into the midterms and It's a tough one to have. Don't underestimate it.
- [37:23]
Piers Morgan
Okay, Brian? I mean, you know, I'm just wondering how the average Trump supporter, I think in the polls, the MAGA crowd will always go with Trump. It's, it's almost got religious fervor to it. But, but Brian, when you look at the overarching thing that I look at, which is this is a guy, Donald Trump, I've known him 20 years, we're friends. I know defense of that. I've always got on well with him and a few blips, but I like him personally. But it's interesting to me that he would campaign so vociferously after four years out of office on no more taking America into wars in the Middle east because they're so ruinous economically and on human life and a focus on America first and the American economy, boosting the American economy. And yet here in one fell swoop at the end of February, he launches the biggest war imaginable in the Middle east and it's caused the kind of ruinous economic meltdown that many predicted would obviously happen if America and, or Israel did that. So I just, I really struggle to understand why he would do that now and expect people to come out in November and vote for a Trump led Republican party.
- [38:47]
Brian McGuinness
I think it gives reference to the power of the aipac, American Israeli Public Affairs Committee and the great, the great existence of Israeli influence. And Trump is very much susceptible to that. And I think they have the Greater Israel Project. They have everything. They've been wanting America to attack Iran for years. They've said Iran has been two weeks away from nuclear bombs for 30 years. And so they finally got Trump to do that, to capitulate and they've greatly weakened Iran and this is a win for Israel. But this narrative is so hard to be on this panel. I know it's an economic panel, but it's just not thinking about the many victims of the Gaza genocide and all the attacks Israel is doing against Lebanon and all the surrounding area. And I understand the plight of the Iranians and their struggles, but Iran has been under severe sanctions for years, for decades, and that's greatly contributed to the suffering of the Iranians. And I see you shaking your head, but I don't think militarism by America is going to help the social issues. Iran can help themselves. I respect you in being that you are from Iran, but this is obviously not the time for American militarism to intervene and destroy this infrastructure, affect the global economy and make this Action. The Iranians are a sovereign nation and Israel's record of destruction in that region has to be pronounced. And I can't tolerate all this conversation just discussing Trump's exit ramp and how it will best suit him. There's so much death and there's so much accountability. Accountability that must be had. So we must. I really hope that. Well, at that. I demand accountability. We have to. Trump has backstepped on his campaign promises. He's just. He's throwing us into a war. And I do have concerns about nuclear. Nuclear threat. And we do have to de. Escalate this. And I hope that Trump's negotiations continue positively.
- [40:55]
Piers Morgan
Okay, Goldie, you were shaking your head there. Your response to that.
- [40:59]
Goldie Gamari
First of all, there's so much craziness that I just heard, I don't even know where to begin. But where were you when two months ago, in the beginning of January, the Islamic regime slaughtered over 40,000 innocent unarmed protesters just because they wanted to live in a free and democratic society? Where were you? Where were you when on Friday on. Don't interrupt me when I'm speaking. Do not interrupt when I'm speaking. I let you speak. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking. Do not interrupt me. Where were you when the Islamic regime gang raped two nurses because they were helping Iranian protesters? They took them, they gang raped them. One of them was gang raped so hard that they had to remove her uterus. Where were you for that? Where were you when on Friday the Islamic regime executed five innocent, young Iranian men? Young, innocent Iranian men. Where were you? Nowhere. So don't bring your Israeli conspiracy theories here. No one's buying it. No one cares for it. This is something that the Iranian people have wanted for a very, very long time. It's called the responsibility to protect. It is a UN doctrine. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking. You are insulting the Iranian people's right to self determination by claiming that this is some sort of Israeli project. What Iranian people are saying inside of occupied Iran is that we are grateful for American and US interventionalism. And you would know that, except the Islamic regime has shut down the Internet. For the last 24 days, the Internet has been cut off. 90 million Iranians in occupied Iran do not have a voice. And what you, sir, are hearing is Islamic regime propaganda. So I would suggest you take a step back, open up your, you know, open your mind a little bit more and maybe ask yourself, why did the Islamic regime shut down the Internet? Why is the Islamic regime cut off the Internet, silencing the voices of 90 million people. So please, sir, do not interrupt, do not insult Iranians. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking.
- [43:07]
Piers Morgan
Have some respect. Okay, Brian, you can now respond.
- [43:11]
Brian McGuinness
That was that.
- [43:12]
Hogan Gidley
They were.
- [43:13]
Brian McGuinness
They are defending themselves. And I'm sorry for that. Those atrocities. And it's 90 million people, there's gonna be atrocities happening like that. And I'm sorry for that. I don't condone of that. But militarism is not going to fix that. Sanctions by America is just contributing to the suffering of Iran, all the. And America. And so.
- [43:35]
Piers Morgan
Well, let him speak, Goldie. You didn't like him interrupting you, so let him speak.
- [43:40]
Brian McGuinness
And so my sympathies for those who are suffering in this world, but the militarism is not going to help this. Adding more pain and suffering is not going to help this. Destroying our infrastructures for the globe is not going to help this. And so this is a big money move that is just sacrificing American lives. If Israel truly wants to get rid of Iran as a threat, why don't they contribute their soldiers? But they're too busy proliferating their land in Lebanon, which they've never held tight to their ceasefire. Israel has a horrible record of not delivering on any ceasefires. They continue to kill the people in Gaza. They're annexing the West Bank. I've been to west bank myself. I've experienced the cruel, brutal behaviors of the Israeli settlers. What you should be talking about is the Israeli settlers in the west bank, their horrid ability, their horrid actions, they're. They are the true terrorists.
- [44:34]
Piers Morgan
Well, there's been, there's certainly been some disgusting scenes coming out of the west bank in the last few days. I think that is extremely clear. And they're being committed by, in the main, Israeli settlers attacking Palestinians. And it's been appalling. Anthony Scaramucci, just what's interesting to me looking at this from the politics again, is there's been very little sign of J.D. vance, for example, in all this. What does it mean for life post Trump? You know, there's a lot of jostling proposition about who the heir apparent will be. How impactful would the Iran war be, do you think, in determining who that is? And is one of the reasons for Vance's relative silence that he wants to keep, keep his name out of this?
- [45:26]
Hogan Gidley
Well, listen, I mean, it's been reported, you know, he leaked that to CBS News that he didn't want anything to do with it. And him and Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Kent. Others were put in a separate situation Room away from Mar A Lago, the people that were dissenting from the military action. So, you know, I know this is a contrary statement to make, but it's not clear to me that Vance is going to run. Pierce, his wife's pregnant. He does not have the support of the Pope. And I know people say, well, what does that mean? He just converted to Catholicism, as you guys know. And the Pope has really diverged from the President and from the president's policies and has been critical. And there are 80 million Catholics in this country. He's not going to be able to win the presidency without that level of support. So there's a good chance here he doesn't run, which would make Marco Rubio the apparent. And then you just have to tell me what the outcome of this is. If there's a positive outcome, it'll help Marco Rubio. But if it's a quagmire, this will be a disaster for the Republicans come 2028.
- [46:35]
Piers Morgan
Hogan, there's a lot going on. Every minute, even while we've been talking, there's a lot going on. Donald Trump said earlier today there'd been very strong talks between Washington and Tehran in the last 24, 36 hours. It was clear Iran wanted to make a deal. But the Iranian parliament speaker, Mohammed Baga Galibaf, has reiterated that no such talks, as far as they're concerned, have taken place. He posted to X. No negotiations have been held with the US and fake news is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US And Israel are trapped. Now, this is one of the people that we're supposed to believe the Americans have been talking to and, you know, somebody that can be. They can do business with absolutely rubbishing any suggestion that there have been talks to try and end this and saying it's all just a scam by the Americans or the administration to stop the markets crashing.
- [47:32]
Anthony Scaramucci
Okay. I mean, the same people who said that they lied about their ballistic missile capability into hitting Europe, I mean, these people are proven terrorists. They're lying all of the time, of course, and to sympathize with them and their, quote, unquote struggle is absolutely ridiculous when you consider all the death and destruction that they've paid for committed themselves all over this globe. People on the right and left here in America have been furious at Iran for so long, and only Donald Trump did something about it. Now, how this ends up, of course, matters, and that's gonna effectuate voting tendencies for the midterms, of course. But the fact is there are people in Iran right now who have been oppressed by this regime for decades. This is not something Donald Trump did because Israel told him to do it. The only people Donald Trump, he's beholden to are the American people. That's it. And if it helps our interests around the globe, and quite frankly, with our partners and allies, including the only democracy in the region, Israel, sure, then maybe we might do something. The America first agenda is designed to effectuate change and support and offer protection for the American people first. But it's not always America alone. He did this in the first term. And while the naysayers did what they did and said, anything he does in the region is going to make it break out into utter chaos and we're going to see destruction in the streets. Instead, he got peace deals that no one thought was possible. Several of them in just a few short years. This is on track to do something monumental yet again, because all the people on the left who complain about these atrocities to women, who complain about atrocities to those who voice their own opinions, have been utterly silent. And oftentimes in my political debates, Pierce, what I think of is who supports what I support, who's against what I'm against. The only real groups against Donald Trump going in to Iran with this military action is Russia, China and the Democrats. They're all in league together. Everyone else sees this as a global good. Donald Trump's the leader who's doing it out of interest.
- [49:42]
Piers Morgan
I mean, given that Russia and China and North Korea all oppressive their people in various ways, it's pretty awful. Being a woman in North Korea and they all have weapons of mass destruction. Would it not be logical then, that the United States would also want to attack those countries and neutralize their ability to perpetrate evil? Or is it just one rule for Iran and one rule for the others?
- [50:09]
Anthony Scaramucci
Well, look, I was in. I went to North Korea with the president in the first administration. He was able to talk to and have conversations with that particular leader. Iran is a completely different issue.
- [50:21]
Piers Morgan
Really? You think the Iranian regime is any different to the North Korean regime?
- [50:27]
Anthony Scaramucci
I mean, you. Can you point to any of the last terrorist activity around the globe that North Korea has paid for or committed themselves?
- [50:34]
Piers Morgan
I suspect the North Koreans are up to all sorts of stuff. Yeah, I mean, they didn't. They send 10,000 troops to. You can suspect it.
- [50:41]
Anthony Scaramucci
What I'm saying is that they sent 10,000 troops actively doing it.
- [50:44]
Piers Morgan
Well, they sent 10,000 troops to Ukraine to fight Putin's illegal war on a European sovereign democratic country, for one, that was one of their recent actions.
- [50:54]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Sure.
- [50:54]
Anthony Scaramucci
But if you're going to pretend as though all of the despots and dictators all over the globe are the same, they're just.
- [51:00]
Piers Morgan
I'm not, but I'm pointing. I'm just saying the reason why no one's attacked Iran in the past is because it's so big and the regime is so well armed that there was, and it has control over the global oil supply, that there was always a risk of exactly what has now happened, happening. That's what's determined. In the same way that you wouldn't, you wouldn't want to start, even though America has the biggest military in the world, they wouldn't want to start a shooting match with Putin or with Xi or with Kim Jong Un. They've been similar arguments, but the argument appears to have collapsed with Iran. And many people are very concerned, understandably, that, you know, what we're now seeing is the repercussion of a reckless decision which has let a tinderbox off.
- [51:46]
Anthony Scaramucci
No, I would disagree, obviously, with the characterization of a reckless decision. But let's be clear. Joe Biden actually said it would be fine if Russia had a minor incursion into Ukraine. And what did the world do? Rallied around Ukraine, led by the United States of America. How come this administration, excuse me, this, this terrorist organization in Iran has nuclear weapons and everyone agrees they shouldn't have them, everyone hates them and says they're a terrorist entity that causes death and destruction all over the globe, and yet they're holding back and not helping their major ally, the United States, in this. Now they're, I think they're going to come forward and actually start helping because they realize how difficult it's going to be for them in the future. But regardless, these. Listen, again, having worked in this White House, I worked in a White House with Donald Trump, understanding the global issues that this country faces. They are very nuanced, they are very difficult. They are rarely cut and dry. However, when you see a regime doing what it does to its people, what it does to the American people since the 70s, and paying for other entities to cause death, to cause casualties. We just had several terrorist attacks here in this country alone by Iranian nationals, and not one single mosque, not one imam came out and said, no, this is bad. We're the religion of peace. We're not going to support this. If this, if a Christian came out, a supposed Christian came out and threw bombs at Mandami's house and said, I do this in the name of Christianity and Jesus. Every pastor on the planet would come out and say, that is not Christianity. We disavow that. These people have come out in the name of Islam to destroy and kill and maim. And no single mosque, no imam in this country comes out and says, no, that's not what we're about. That, to me, is quite telling. And again, a global issue here that the world faces. America's taking the leadership, of course, working with our partners and allies, but we're the ones capable of doing this. What happens on the backside, again, matters to the American people and to the electorate. But right now he's doing what needs to be done to keep this world a safer place.
- [53:58]
Piers Morgan
Okay. Well, I hope you're right.
- [53:59]
Goldie Gamari
There's quick clarification on just a very small thing. The acts of terrorism were not committed by Iranian nationals. They were committed by people hired by the Islamic regime. One of them was Pakistani, one of them Senegal. So not Iranian.
- [54:13]
Piers Morgan
No. That's an important clarification. Yeah, that's correct. Okay, I've got to leave it there. A very interesting discussion. Thank you all very much indeed.
- [54:20]
Hogan Gidley
Good to be on.
- [54:21]
Piers Morgan
Thanks. As I said a little earlier, Iran's Parliament speaker is one of the senior Iranians reported to have been negotiating with the US Through Steve Whitney and Jared Kushner. He's now denied that any talks have taken place. Joining me from Iran with his verdict is Professor Mohammad Morandi from Tehran University. Professor Morandi, thank you for coming back on uncensored.
- [54:40]
Anthony Scaramucci
Nearly home.
- [54:42]
Reba (Realtor.com spokesperson)
Isn't home where we all want to be? Reba here for realtor.com the Pro's number one most trusted app. Finding a home is like dating. You're not just looking for a place to live. You're searching for the world. That's where realtor.com comes in. Like any good matchmaker, they know exactly where to look. With over 500,000 new real listings straight from the pros every month, you could find your perfect match today. Ranch style with the pool, barn dominium with an in Law Suite. Realtor.com's got em modern craftsman with a big yard and a treehouse out back. Realtor.com will have you saying yep, that's the one. No more swapping. It's time to start finding. Download the realtor.com app today cause you're nearly home. Make it real with realtor.com pro's number
- [55:32]
Piers Morgan
one most trusted app based on August 2025 proprietary survey.
- [55:35]
Anthony Scaramucci
Over 500,000 new listings every Month based on average new for sale and rental listings.
- [55:38]
Shushank Joshi
July 2024 to June 2025 Donald Trump
- [55:42]
Piers Morgan
posted this this morning. I'm pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had over the last two days very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East. Based on the tenor and tone of these in depth, detailed and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I've instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions. Donald J. Trump, what is your response to that? Because all the official responses have been that there have been no discussions whatsoever. Is that your understanding?
- [56:25]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Yes, there have not been any talks. The reason it is believed here that Trump made this statement was because he was worried about the markets. And he made the statement, I think an hour before the markets opened on Monday. And of course these five days would end after the markets close on Friday. I think he's also deeply concerned about the fact that Iran said that it will retaliate with great force if these crimes against humanity are carried out. Because obviously targeting vital infrastructure that ordinary people use is a crime against humanity. But of course, as usual, there's no outcry in the west because for the west, we live in the jungle.
- [57:18]
Piers Morgan
Well, I mean my response to that would be that I think that there's always been an understood red line, that you don't go after each other's energy plants. And that line was crossed. I think it was crossed by Israel attacking one of the Iranian power plants. Iran responded in kind, attacking a refinery in Qatar and threatening to do more of that. And we now get to a place where Donald Trump threatened to blow up huge amounts of the Iranian power plants and now appears to have backed down from that, claiming to have had discussion. So this red line is an important one, isn't it? Because in nobody's interest in this conflict that Iranians power plants get destroyed and they respond by taking out all of the neighboring Gulf states power plants. That would be energy Armageddon.
- [58:15]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
So Pierce, you condemn Donald Trump for threatening to take out Iran's critical infrastructure's vital infrastructure that is targeting 92 million Iranians? Yes. Good, you finally agree on something.
- [58:34]
Piers Morgan
I didn't agree with what Israel did in attacking the refinery. I wouldn't agree if America decided to attack more of the power plants. I think in particular you have an issue with the Gulf States, with the desalination Plants both in Iran, but also obviously in all the Gulf states, its neighboring states there where having spent a lot of time in the Middle East, I know that if you took out the desalination plants, then the ability of the populations of these Gulf states to drink water would very rapidly disappear and you would potentially have millions of people unable to get to access water, which would be devastating. That's why it's always been a red line. But many red lines have been ripped up, it seems to me, in this war so far. How do you think this ends?
- [59:27]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Well, all the red lines were, of course, crossed by the United States. An unprovoked war, murdering 168 little girls on day one in the first strike, murdering the leader, denying that they carried out the strike against the girls, pretending that it was the Iranians, in other words, pretending it was the victims. But of course, this is the 47 year old history of Iran in the United States. The United States carries out aggression and it always blames the victim and the victim is somehow the problem. But I think the war will end in a strategic defeat for Trump. The Iranians are not going to let go until the facts on the ground change. And Iran feels assured that this will never happen again. They're going to continue because we already went through this once. We were negotiating and Trump was secretly conspiring to attack Iran with Netanyahu eight, nine months ago. Then again, this time around, as we were negotiating, he did the same thing. So we're not going to allow him to walk away, rearm himself, prepare himself, and then launch another attack six months from now, a year from now, or two years from now.
- [60:40]
Piers Morgan
Okay, but the argument, of course, would come back exactly the same to Iran. And many people will laugh, you know, wryly, at your description of Iran as any kind of victim, given its activities in supporting terrorist organizations all over the Middle east for decades, given the repression of its own people, in the 47 years this regime has been intact. And you and I have debated that ad infinitum. You're never going to give an inch about any of it. I'm not going to waste more time trying to get you to now. But in relation to a settlement, the Americans and the Israelis will want exactly the same from Iran. They will say the whole point of why they waged this attack. And look, I don't know what they know, but they say that there was legitimate evidence that Iran had been very rapidly rebuilding its nuclear capability, enriching the uranium to a point where it could create a nuclear bomb, and they could not allow that to happen. And that was against undertakings that Iran had given the international community. So they want the same thing from you that you have just asked for from them. So I ask simply, how does it get resolved?
- [61:52]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
No, there is no moral equivalence between an evil empire and its victims. There never was moral equivalence. Iran does not have terrorist organizations in the region. Hezbollah, which you call a terrorist organization, was created as a result of the Israeli regime's invasion of Lebanon and the occupation of the capital of the country it was born to expel this regime that had occupied its country. And in Palestine, all of the resistance organizations were created, every single one were created as a result of occupation, ethnic cleansing, something that you know quite well, but you want to see otherwise. Or the resistance in Iraq or Afghanistan. You deny the people of these countries agency when a foreign power controls their fate. And then you want to blame Iran for everything that happens. Instead of invading countries and occupying countries and murdering people, the empire should just go home and have normal relations with each, with each other country. And then we wouldn't have this sort of conflict.
- [63:02]
Piers Morgan
So do you concede, do you concede quite happily then, that the Iranian regime has supported, both with money and with arms, Hezbollah, the Houthis and Hamas? Are you proud of that?
- [63:17]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Yes, why not? They are liberation organizations. Without Hezbollah, the US Regime, the Israeli regime, would still be occupying Lebanon. They would still be controlling Lebanon. The same is true in Palestine. By now they would have ethnically cleansed the entire land of Palestine right now as we speak. You know this as well as I. They are ethnic. They are carrying out ethnic cleansing in the west bank. And the west is silent. Not a single Western embassy protests. Why? Because all of the west believes, unofficially the same thing that the US Ambassador does in occupied Palestine. What does he believe? He believes that the Israeli regime has the most moral army in the world, like in Gaza with the genocide, and that if it takes over the entire region, that's fine. This is the unofficial policy of the United States and its European partners. Official policy is something else. So without a doubt, it is the Palestinians who are the victims. It is the Lebanese who are the victims. It is the Yemenis who are victims, and it is the Iraqis who have been victims. And now it's the Iranians who are victims. Your countries are all. You want to portray them as victims, but they go and kidnap presidents in Latin America, they strangle people in Cuba, they destroy Libya and allow slave markets to emerge. And somehow you're always this innocent bystander and we are the bad guys.
- [64:56]
Piers Morgan
Well, I have. Just to be clear, I've never described. I've never used the word victim about either the United States or Israel. I don't believe them to be victims, but I understand their arguments for why they do what they do. I don't always agree with them, but I understand their arguments. In the same way I listen to your arguments. My question for you. You asked me to condemn the notion of America attacking big power plants in Iran, and I happily did that. I think it would be a terrible mistake because I think Iran would immediately do the same thing to all the neighboring Gulf states, and it would be, as I said, energy Armageddon. Would you condemn the terror attacks committed by 3,000 Hamas terrorists on October 7, for example, in return?
- [65:41]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
We went through that the first time I was on your show, and I said I would condemn them if I were to condemn the French Resistance against the Nazis.
- [65:49]
Piers Morgan
Okay, so you don't condemn it. Just to be clear, you're equivocating, but you don't. You don't condemn it. Okay, so look, viewers can make their own minds up. If you can't condemn 3,000 people coming over a border and attacking innocent people who are at a music festival or in their kibbutz or wherever it may be, killing elderly people, young people, kidnapping a baby, kidnapping Holocaust survivors, if you can't find it in yourself to condemn the actions that day by Hamas, people will judge you accordingly. You can be as judgmental as you want against the United States and Israel, and some of the points you make I may agree with. But whereas I'm happy to condemn what would be a grotesque miscalculation if the Americans did attack your power plants, you can't even condemn the murder of 1200 people and the kidnapping of another 250. And that says a lot about you, Professor Morandi.
- [66:50]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
No, actually, I think it says a lot about you because you know better than to say this, but you have to say this. That's how you keep your job.
- [66:56]
Piers Morgan
Why? Who do you think I'm answerable to? Oh, well, the who I get. I own my own business. I own my own channel. I'm answerable to nobody.
- [67:11]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
The people who keep your show on air.
- [67:13]
Piers Morgan
Who? Who? So, hang on, who?
- [67:15]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
The people who keep your show.
- [67:16]
Piers Morgan
Who do you think keeps me on air?
- [67:18]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Oh, well, you know, much better. You don't want me.
- [67:23]
Piers Morgan
Give me a name.
- [67:25]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
The people. The people that own. The people that own the media industry.
- [67:32]
Piers Morgan
Who are you talking about? Who do you think puts me on air?
- [67:36]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You know quite well.
- [67:37]
Piers Morgan
Give me a name.
- [67:38]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
That it is. It is. You don't want me to answer your question.
- [67:41]
Piers Morgan
No, no, I do. Give me a name. Please. Give me a name. Give me a name.
- [67:45]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Look, Pierce, the first time you invited
- [67:47]
Piers Morgan
me, one name allowed me to talk. One name of somebody who controls me or tell people to put away for you.
- [67:53]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
And ever since then, you prevent me from speaking.
- [67:57]
Piers Morgan
Just give me a name.
- [67:58]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You know, whenever I speak, you have no answer.
- [68:01]
Piers Morgan
Give me a name.
- [68:03]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
If you don't know who owns your. Who owns the media, that.
- [68:06]
Piers Morgan
That you.
- [68:07]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
That your company works and provide services for, go and look it up.
- [68:11]
Piers Morgan
Sorry, you can look
- [68:14]
Anthony Scaramucci
at.
- [68:14]
Piers Morgan
My company is owned by me.
- [68:17]
Anthony Scaramucci
Yes.
- [68:18]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
In any case, your company that is owned by you uses this format, this platform, to speak to me and prevent me from speaking. And you talk over.
- [68:27]
Piers Morgan
When have I prevented you from speaking? I've had you on multiple times.
- [68:31]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You never let me talk.
- [68:32]
Piers Morgan
I never prevent you from speaking. You say that I'm under control by people, but you won't name them again. Viewers can make their own calculations.
- [68:41]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Look it up.
- [68:42]
Piers Morgan
Give me your name.
- [68:44]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Look them up. I'll send it to you after the show and give you the name of the people who you work with.
- [68:49]
Piers Morgan
We're all censored. Look it up after the show and give me a name. If you think I'm being censored, give me a name.
- [68:54]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Why do you invite me if you're afraid of me talking?
- [68:57]
Piers Morgan
Because you are a spokesman for the Iranian regime in Tehran and therefore your opinions in the middle of a war in Iran against America and Israel,
- [69:11]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
you're talking nonsense. Because I'm not a spokesman for anyone. But this is how you like to discredit me. I'm an academic and I teach at the University of Tehran, and I don't get paid for doing this work. I risk my life. Did you know that a verified account on Twitter that has paid partnership is gathering money, a million dollars, in order to.
- [69:37]
Piers Morgan
I thought it was disgusting.
- [69:39]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Do you condemn.
- [69:41]
Piers Morgan
I condemn it.
- [69:42]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Yeah. Yeah. Do you condemn the owner of Twitter, Elon Musk?
- [69:47]
Piers Morgan
Elon Musk. You mean Elon Musk. I think Elon Musk should not allow that to be done on his platform. I think. I think it's terrible. Yes.
- [69:58]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You condemn it?
- [69:59]
Piers Morgan
Yes.
- [70:00]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Okay.
- [70:01]
Piers Morgan
Yeah. So I find it easy. I find it easy to condemn. But terrible things like you, you don't.
- [70:07]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
But people like you dishonestly say I'm a spokesperson, even though if I were a spokesman, that would not legitimize what they do, but by creating this aura that is dishonest. You create an environment where they can get away with these crimes.
- [70:23]
Piers Morgan
Right. Well, just to be clear, once again, now, all my loved ones, once again
- [70:30]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
be afraid. You ask me the things that you say and the actions that they take.
- [70:35]
Piers Morgan
Fine. You've asked me several times.
- [70:38]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Just let me ask.
- [70:40]
Piers Morgan
You've asked me several times if I condemn various things and I have immediately condemned them. I asked you to condemn one thing and it was the Hamas attacks. Attacks.
- [70:53]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Let me respond to that.
- [70:54]
Piers Morgan
And you chose not to respond and liken them to the French Resistance. And people, like I said, respond to that, as they do with all our interviews. They will judge you according to what you say.
- [71:04]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You don't want me to answer the question.
- [71:06]
Piers Morgan
You don't answer.
- [71:08]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
I'll answer. Hamas is a resistance organization. Listen for a moment. The people who live in Gaza come from Palestine. They are refugees that were pushed.
- [71:22]
Piers Morgan
I asked you if you condemned it and you said no end. You answered the question. Listen, I've got to leave it there.
- [71:28]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Professor Morandi, listen.
- [71:30]
Piers Morgan
You chose not to condemn it and you chose not to tell me who you think controls my show. Viewers can make their own minds up about your answers, but you cannot say. I don't give you a platform because I regularly do and we don't censor anything you say. But I condemn things when I think they're wrong.
- [71:48]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You don't. No, you haven't let me.
- [71:50]
Piers Morgan
You don't. You don't. You don't think they're wrong,
- [71:54]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
by the way.
- [71:55]
Piers Morgan
Perfectly justified.
- [71:57]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
I've got to leave it there has said that you can have a live debate. Debate with me, A live debate.
- [72:05]
Piers Morgan
Let's do it.
- [72:05]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Whenever you like. So come to Iran.
- [72:07]
Piers Morgan
No, no, you come to London and sit in this studio and we'll do it. Done deal. I'm gonna leave it there. I'll leave it there.
- [72:21]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
You've never been to Iran.
- [72:22]
Piers Morgan
I appreciate you. I appreciate you coming on Uncensored. If you want to come and have the balls to fly over here and sit right here opposite me, you do it. We'll air it uncensored.
- [72:33]
Professor Mohammad Morandi
Thank you very much.
- [72:36]
Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we offer only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple podcasts. And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain, and we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical, and we couldn't do it without you.