SC Ep. 3: Judicial Reverence and the Apolitical Myth Steidle-Soto

For episode 3 of our Supreme Court season, we acknowledge two unsaid realities:

First, where and why do we have an extensive reverence of the Supreme Court? Is it even justified? We examine the conditions and expectations that perpetuate the reverence. The sanctimony cycle is unending: from the American people, to the press, and back to the Court. Most importantly, we explore the notion that reverence of the Court inhibits the press from holding the institution accountable.

Second, we break down the myth that the Supreme Court is an apolitical institution. This is true in current times and also since the founding. The Court has always had political drama; we’ve just been really good at ignoring them.

Resources

You can check out our ongoing research list spreadsheet here

Contact us

Email us at podcast@polilogue.com or you can send us your feedback @PolilogueCast. You can also follow us at @sotonaomi_ and @bsteidle.

Support the show: We produce Polilogue out of our own pocket. If you’d like to support the show with a one-time or recurring donation, please visit our donate page here. Or leave a review on iTunes, Apple Music, or the Apple Podcast library. Thank you!

Check out some of our other work:

Brendan’s website: www.armisticedesigns.com

Naomi's website: www.startwithaquestion.org