Loading summary
Advertiser
This message comes from Pemco Mutual Insurance Company. Their mission is to help customers worry less and live more. So they're sharing prevention tips that empower you to prevent some of life's pitfalls before they happen. Visit pemco.com prevention.
Glenn Weldon
How and why does a TV show get its hooks into you? What is it about a show that turns you into a bitter ender, that keeps you dutifully watching every last episode? Long after the chewing gum has lost its flavor? Long after the train has jumped the tracks? Even when you know it's not good. But for you anyway, it's just good enough to muddle through all the way to the finale. I'm Glenn Weldon. Today we're talking about TV shows we've watched in their entirety, despite our better judgment on Pop Culture Happy Hour from npr.
Advertiser
This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices like full service, wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on thinkorswim. Visit schwab.com to learn more.
This message comes from Redfin. With the Redfin app, you'll know the moment your next place hits the market. Whether you're looking to buy your dream home or rent a sweet apartment, give Redfin your Gotta have it wish list of property features and you'll receive real time notifications tailored just for you, ready to see it up close and personal scheduling a tour is just a tap away, and don't wait to find your perfect match. Download the Redfin app and start searching today. This message comes from Amica Insurance. As Amica says, empathy is our best policy. Whether you're seeking auto, home or life coverage, they'll work with you to choose the policy that best serves you and your family. Discover how Amica can help protect what matters most to you today. Go to amica.com and get a quote today.
This message comes from Pemco Mutual Insurance Company. You know that moment when things take an unexpected turn and you get that sudden sinking feeling that maybe it could have been avoided? Pemco Insurance wants to help you avoid that feeling by sharing prevention tips that empower you to prevent some of life's preventable pitfalls? Because Pemco's commitment to their customers goes beyond the moment of a claim, it's about being with their customers every day. More @pemco.com prevention this message comes from BetterHelp. Think about the people who inspire you the most. They don't have all the answers, but they probably do know how to ask for support when they need it. Therapy can be a great way to find that support. BetterHelp has experienced therapists who can help with challenges ranging from clinical issues to everyday stressors. Build your support system@betterhelp.com NPR today to get 10% off your first month.
Glenn Weldon
Joining me today are the core four, my fellow pop Culture Happy hour hosts, Linda Holmes. Hey, Linda.
Linda Holmes
Hey, Glenn.
Glenn Weldon
Aisha Harris. Hey, pal.
Aisha Harris
Hey there.
Glenn Weldon
And Stephen Thompson, my friend. How are you?
Stephen Thompson
Hey, buddy.
Glenn Weldon
All right, we're not gonna pussyfoot around here. We will have much to talk about. Let's get right to it. Linda, what is your pick?
Linda Holmes
Well, my pick, it's funny because in the intro you made this sound like something that would drag on for years and years and years and years. Like the people who watched all 68 seasons of VR or whatever, but of whom I do, by the way, know some of those people. But I chose something that didn't drag on for quite so long, but certainly dragged on far past when I knew it was a bad idea because that happened in the first five minutes of the 2003 Fox show married by America. Now, I have made mention of this show. I have made mention of this show on the podcast before. It is important to understand that in 2003 when this show premiered, we were three years ish after who Wants to Marry a Millionaire? Which was Fox's sort of big controversial beauty pageant slash nightmare, you know, dystopian nightmare of a, of a quote unquote reality show. And this was a modification where there were a group of single people. And, and I'm cutting out a lot of steps because believe me, there were a lot of steps. But single people had their and family choose a person for them to get engaged to, quote unquote. And so then they got engaged and they're. The scare quotes are enormous. The air quotes are blowing your hair back. So they got up on stage at a live, it was sort of a like a live pageanty type of an event. They got up on stage and with the woman sticking her hand through a hole in a sort of screen so that the guy could put the ring on it. Cause these were of course, all stray couples.
Aisha Harris
I don't remember this part.
Stephen Thompson
Yeah, the woman is like at crotch level.
Linda Holmes
Yeah, the crotch level hole that the woman stuck her hand through so that the man could put the ring on it without them seeing or meeting each other. And then they would take down the screen and the people would meet. And there were, I think, like five couples, I think they sent them off to a, like a resort hotel to spend time together and decide whether to actually get married. And there was a prize where they were gonna win. I believe it was a car and a house. If they actually got married, which if you think about it, is perverse in the extreme.
Aisha Harris
No, true.
Linda Holmes
But the thing that made it really special in the end was that in the end no one got married. So it was a show called Married by America in which no one got married, which the entire point of it was supposed to be. These people are committing to marrying someone they never met, which of course was not true and should not be true and was completely made up. So the show came to nothing with the exception of the fact that it was very, very low class. I guess I would say I don't tend to think of myself as someone who's bothered by low class reality tv, but for me, this was the low point for class and reality television. In some ways lower, I would say, than Fear Factor because those people just ate. Like, if you're just eating bugs or doing something gross, you're fine. Tomorrow, if you're hiding in the closet on your fake wedding day on national television because the bro that you're supposed to marry broke your heart because you really decided that you fell in love with him and he doesn't love you, that's going to stay with you for a while. So the biggest reason why I stuck with this, for all I don't know what it was, six episodes, eight episodes, I had an excuse, which was I was watching this for work. Right.
Glenn Weldon
Okay.
Linda Holmes
This was something that I covered. And so I was getting, you know, I was on an assignment with that show. But honestly, even if I hadn't been, it's possible that I would have stuck with it because at the time, I think I had a bigger appetite for just the kind of train wreck y. I can't believe I'm watching this kind of thing, which now when I start to get that feeling, I'm just like, okay, something actually bad is gonna either now or later. And I'm going to turn away from this before it happens. And the funny thing is, I know one person on the entire planet who watched this show besides me, and it's Steven. So. And this was before we met. This is before we knew each other.
Glenn Weldon
Now, Steven, this feels like a show that was not made to entertain, but to instigate. It's aimed to be water cooler television to launch think pieces and get a lot of hands ringing and tongues clucking. I understand that curiosity gets you in the door. Even morbid curiosity gets you in the door. Cause car wrecks, cause rubbernecking. But what key as a fellow bitter ender for this show? What kept you there? Stephen.
Stephen Thompson
Like Love is Blind, the current show that has a lot of Married by America DNA to it.
Aisha Harris
It does.
Stephen Thompson
It was one of those shows that was sort of unintentionally interesting or that stumbled into revelations about the way bad couples can fall into patterns in ways that I did find sociologically interesting. But it is an objectively terrible show. It is a show that absolutely no idea what it wants to do and kind of changes course and changes the definition of what it's even supposed to be trying to accomplish over the course of that season.
Linda Holmes
Yeah, the only other thing I would say about this show, and I think we've probably now talked about it more than anyone's ever talked about it in history, there are a number of reality shows from this period, and this is one of them that have been kind of memory hold in a certain way. You can't find it. You can't stream. You can't even find, like press releases and photos as easily as you can for most things. They have really tried to take some of these shows and sort of suck them into a hole of. We never did that. That never happened. You can't just find it. Like you think Disney stuff's in the vault. This is in a vault.
Aisha Harris
I did find what looked like the final episode on YouTube.
Linda Holmes
I would believe that.
Glenn Weldon
Now, Aisha. I was looking over our prep doc and I noticed that a few of our picks are older show from a time before peak tv, before streaming. And I figured that makes sense because now it is so easy to abandon a show mid season because so many other shows are just waiting for you. But your pick, your pick is more recent. It premiered before peak tv, before streaming, but it is still ongoing. And yet. And yet. And yet you are still watching it. You defy my thesis. Tell me what your pick is, dude.
Aisha Harris
So this might as well be called Aisha's Guilty Pleasure, because, yes, I am still watching it. And that is Teen Mom 2. No, not. Not Teen mom, the original iteration, but Teen Mom 2. Although it has recently been merged with the OG series and is now called Teen the Next Chapter. There's also Teen Mom Family Reunion, which, like, it's a whole thing. I'm still watching it all.
Linda Holmes
What is the difference between Teen mom.
Glenn Weldon
And Teen mom, please.
Aisha Harris
Okay, so, yes, I have to give a little bit of context here. So first of all, Teen mom is a Franchise? Yes, it's a franchise within MTV. It's a spinoff of another TV show known as 16 and Pregnant, and that premiered in 2009. And that was a docuseries kind of in the same mode as, like, True Life, where it was like every episode was about a different teenage girl who got pregnant. And then it follows her pregnancy. And then often there's. There's the partner, the boy, the boyfriend or the sometime boyfriend who's not pulling his weight, and he's. They're both immature and then they have the baby at the end. Now Teen mom and Teen mom two and every. Every other part of the teen franchise, those have been spun out of that. And in the case of Teen Mom 1 and 2, they came out of those 16 and pregnant episodes. So they picked like five or six young girls or women and. And they got their own series. And so with Teen Mom 2, you know, it originally started with Janelle, Chelsea, Kalyn, Leah. They are all from different parts of the country and they are raising kids. And some of these kids now are about to turn into teenagers themselves or our teenagers. Like, this is how long I've been watching this show. And I had to do a lot of soul searching as to why a. I started watching it to begin with and be why I'm still watching it all these years later. But I think what's kept me watching is I have become somewhat invested in these women's lives and how some of them have really been able to seem as though they've stepped up in many ways and they've found partners and found some happiness. And the show sometimes will deal with some very interesting issues in a reality show way, but in a way that kind of feels relevant to what's going on. And it's just. It's a. It's a mess. And any show that, like, has Dr. Drew Pinsky as a quote unquote expert to host the reunions they have every season, it's not a show to be trusted. I do think that to some extent they're exploiting these things. One other final thing I will say is that it's really interesting to track these women and the, like, the side hustles they have. It's very much kind of aligns with the Kardashian effect. And like the era when we were people started becoming famous for being parents. So like John and Kate plus eight, it kind of like came out in that same era, the rise of mommy blogs. And now all of these women have, like, fashion lines or, like makeup lines, and they have their own podcasts, and they've turned being a mom into an entire influencer pipeline. It's just so fascinating to me to watch that. It's similar to the Kardashians, but on a different pay scale. I mean, they're getting paid, believe me, but they're not getting paid. They're not Kardashians.
Glenn Weldon
Well, this is the thing, because any time you watch any reality show, your feelings about it are a lot more complicated than it would seem on the surface. People who think that, people who watch the Kardashians, you know, it's aspirational, it's not necessary. And people who watch Housewives, it's aspirational. It's certainly not because the people are indulging in the camp, but this is one of the reasons. Aisha, I had a question when I saw that on the prop duck, because, I mean, you have said on the show several times that you do not plan on having kids. I didn't. I don't. I'm happy. And the last thing in the world I'd want to do is fill up my free time watching other people have kids and interacting with kids. So are you watching the show just as a. As a narrative that unspools, or are you relating it to your own life in any way?
Aisha Harris
For me, I think it's just. I. It solidifies my decision not to have children. And I'm like, this doesn't look fun. Like, nothing about this looks fun. And I really want someone. I would love for someone to do a study of these kids, because I think this is the first generation of kids that has literally grown up on, like, having cameras in their face as long as they were sentient. And so I feel as though these kids have had cameras on their faces and been aware of, like, being recorded all the time since they were coming out of the womb. Like, and I'm very curious to see five, ten years from now what they are like, and if there's, like, a study that can be done to sort of compare that to also Gen Z, who has basically grown up online as well. So I just think it's a really interesting, for lack of a better word, the cliche, like, social experiment that I would not wish on anyone. But I do find it entertaining. For better or for worse.
Glenn Weldon
No, for better or for worse. I get that now, Steven, you picked a scripted series, and I'm grateful for that, because, spoiler alert, I also picked a reality series. And if we had all picked a reality series, I think we'd be sending the wrong Message because it's for terrible, yet bingeable. You know, that's not the sole province of reality tv. There's plenty of lousy, scripted television that you can't step away from. So what's your pick?
Stephen Thompson
So what I ended up picking was a scripted series and a scripted dramatic series. Now, Glenn, when you pitched your question to Aisha about, like, you were watching this during the height of peak tv, let's think about the shows that were on the air in 2016 and 2017 that I could have been watching other than every single episode of the ABC drama Designated Survivor.
Glenn Weldon
Yep, you're the one which starred Kiefer.
Stephen Thompson
Sutherland as a cabinet official who is, you know, set off in a remote location during the State of the Union address that the president gives and there's a terrorist attack and everyone is killed. And so Kiefer Sutherland becomes the President of the United States. And it's a compelling premise. It's a show that I thought would be a hit. It certainly had this kind of big pedigree behind it. The network was really behind it. It got a ton of promotion. The problem is that this show could go in a number of directions, right? Like, it could be a government drama about process. It could be an FBI thriller. It could be a conspiracy thriller, right? Like unraveling the mystery of how this happened. It could be kind of a police procedural. It could be the West Wing. It could be a light kind of Spin city style political comedy. You know what? It chose to do all of those things simultaneously, and it was a complete disaster. This show, which ultimately ran three seasons, two on ABC and then one more on Netflix. This show, in three seasons, had five different showrunners. And the experience of watching the whole thing was like, every few episodes. You would just imagine this game of telephone in which, like, a new person took over with no regard for what came before it, and then just decided to completely redefine it in their own image, only to get sacked, like, six episodes later, at which point that process would start over again. There is a Wikipedia page for this show that is so thorough, just listing the dozens and dozens of characters who are, like, deeply entrenched in intrigue, only to get written off or killed two episodes later. Look, look at the cast of this thing. At one point, ingenue Ellis was on it. Like, there are all these, like, great people kind of just, like, coming and going and dropping off. Suddenly it goes to Netflix and they're swearing. It is just like 14 different shows. It is completely inscrutable. If you asked me to describe, like, give some sort of summation of what happens over the course of 53 episodes. It would be completely impossible. And yet we watched every episode. It was like Appointment tv. We didn't watch it, like, as it aired on network television with commercials and stuff, but we would stream every single episode, and it was bad.
Glenn Weldon
The phenomenon you're talking about here, Steven, is that of the soap opera is that of the comic book. It is continuous, ongoing narrative that must in itself constantly regenerate and reinvent itself. And that's why people keep watching soap operas. It's tell me a story. Tell me any damn story.
Aisha Harris
It also kind of sounds not that far off from, like, Scandal. I mean, Scandal was kind of all over the place too, after season two or three and was just ridiculous. And that's also another political kind of show in that way. Just super ridiculous.
Stephen Thompson
I do think there is something to be said for a show that is trying to do too much instead of a show that's not trying to do enough. And I think in some ways that kept us watching in ways that a show that was kind of repeating itself might have just kind of driven us away.
Linda Holmes
Sure.
Glenn Weldon
I mean, this is the phenomenon. We talked about this with the show Revenge. It just kept getting bigger and weirder and stupider and more off the walls. And that in itself is compelling Revenge. Revenge. TM all right, we're gonna go back to reality with my pick, a kind of reality. Anyway, this is a reality show called Boy Meets Boy from the year 2003. Just to put this in some kind of cultural context, that's one year after the Bachelor premiered. So there were a lot of imitations. Spring, and it premiered on Bravo. And again, to think of where Bravo was, this was two weeks to the day after Queer Eye for the Straight Guy had premiered, but about a year before the launch of Project Runway. So that's kind of where Bravo was at this cultural moment. The premise, you take this basic ass mask for mask guy named James. He is fit. He is conventionally attractive. He is facially symmetrical. He is square jawed. He is a young CIS white gay man with dimples for days but no discernible personality. I mean, this guy was every guy you'd see out at a Bar in D.C. in 2003. He was a pair of capri pants made flesh. Not so much a snack as a bologna sandwich with a glass of tap water. That's this guy. That guy has to choose a boyfriend from a group of 15 men. He'll be helped in this endeavor by his friend Andra, who was very protective of him, good for her. She's staying with James in this amazing house in palm springs. The 15 dudes are staying in a different house in Palm Springs. And unbeknownst to James and Andra, some of Those prospective suitors, seven out of 15 of them are straight. So if in the end James chooses a gay man, they will win a cash prize and a trip for two to New Zealand because it's 2003. Lord of the Rings. New Zealand. New Zealand. New Zealand. If he chooses a straight man, James wins nothing. The straight guy gets 25k. So. But also, it's just insulting. I had notes. Right, okay, so from the jump, leave aside the ethical murkiness of the, of not revealing the premise to your people, because that is competitive reality tv, that's just baked in. Note also that there are straight men and there are gay men. And that's it.
Stephen Thompson
It's 2003.
Aisha Harris
It was 2003.
Stephen Thompson
Everyone is one or the other.
Glenn Weldon
Any acknowledgement of bisexuality, pansexuality, fluidity. There are two boxes. You will pick one.
Linda Holmes
Well, and if you pick one of the straight men, there is no chance that he actually has any attraction to you, or that there's anything genu about the connection between you or anything like that because he is a straight man.
Glenn Weldon
The entire premise is joke's on you. So the producers, gay producers, they felt they were doing good work.
Aisha Harris
It's the black. What was that? Where the white guy pretended to be black for in the 60s. And then this is what it was.
Linda Holmes
Black like me, totally black lady.
Aisha Harris
But forgive it.
Glenn Weldon
Here is one contestant, this is Wes, who is making the point about how they are shattering stereotypes. And his confessional happens to be just so happens to be intercut with footage of everyone out at a karaoke night.
Stephen Thompson
There's always gonna be stereotypes about gay.
Glenn Weldon
Men not being athletic, gay men not being masculine.
Stephen Thompson
And I think this show blows that.
Glenn Weldon
Out of the water. The smash cut. I live for the smash cut. It's like your world here, shadowing stereotypes. We got news for you. So the producers were in on it, right? The producers knew exactly what they were doing. But look, the premise of the show was to prove that gaydar doesn't exist. That in this crazy mixed up modern world, it's an antiquated notion. Gaydar, it's reductive, maybe it's even homophobic. That's their thesis. But they didn't argue it fairly because the producers, of course, reality tv, they stage every weekly elimination so that whoever James chose There'd still be a mix of gay and straight men in the house. And if they really believed in their premise, they would let James choose whoever they wanted. When they did tell him later in the season, you know, the producers had narrowed it down to three contestants. He reacted. And if the moment of his reaction had happened today, it would have been memed within an inch of its life. Not because of his reaction, but because of his complete lack of one. You're gonna hear a silence in this clip. Seven second silence. And I want you to realize that that silence contains nothing.
Advertiser
Of all three final mates, Wesley, Brian, and Franklin. One of them is straight.
Glenn Weldon
Wow.
Aisha Harris
Did he say wow?
Glenn Weldon
He said wow. And I am here to tell you that perfect, sculpted, vanilla pudding face of his does not move. There is nothing behind the eyes. They do not widen. They do not flash. They are lifeless eyes. Black eyes, like a doll's eyes. It is utter passivity. But let's get back to the whole notion of the show, okay? The zorganizing principle is that gaydar is not a thing. Stereotypes, it's reductive. All gay men are different. Gaydar doesn't exist. Except for the fact that bitch, it so does. I tested myself. I invite the listeners. You can find the first episode of the show on YouTube. Episode 1. They come out of the house and they introduce themselves to James one by one. And I haven't seen the show in 19 years, and I remembered nothing about it except how awesome the Palm Springs real estate is. They come out, and I check my instant, like, insta takes against the Wikipedia page, which tells you who who's and what to what. And I'm here to tell you I'm not lying. 15 for 15. But in the end, you will be happy to know that he chose Wes, the gay guy from the clip who was talking about charity and shattering stereotypes.
Linda Holmes
I thought you weren't gonna tell me what happened. I was like, what are you doing?
Glenn Weldon
So they won the. But they did not take the trip to New Zealand together. They took it separately.
Aisha Harris
Oh, okay.
Glenn Weldon
It's bittersweet.
Linda Holmes
You know, it's possible that they just didn't want to commit themselves to one person at that moment. And you know why? Because it's raining men.
Aisha Harris
That's right.
Linda Holmes
I rest my case.
Glenn Weldon
Well, we want to know what TV shows you begrudgingly watched to their conclusion. Find us@facebook.com p and that brings us to the end of our show. Linda Holmes, Stephen Thompson, Aisha Harris, thanks to all of you for being here. Thank you.
Aisha Harris
Thank you, Glenn.
Glenn Weldon
This episode was produced by Romel Wood and edited by Jessica Reedy. And hello, Come in provides our theme music, which we will all just sit here and listen to the very end. Thank you for listening to Pop Culture Happy Hour from npr. I'm Glenn Weldon and we'll see you all tomorrow.
Advertiser
This message comes from Mejuri Mejuri has changed fine jewelry buying, making it accessible for more than special occasions. Their pieces are handmade using high quality materials, so you know they'll last. Shop online@maguri.com or in store today. This message comes from Warby Parker. If you wear glasses, you know how hard it is to find the perfect pair. But step into a Warby Parker store and you'll see it doesn't have to be. Find a Warby Parker store near you@warbyparker.com retail support for this podcast and the following message come from Indeed. You just realized your business needed to hire someone yesterday. Indeed's sponsored jobs helps you stand out. According to Indeed data, sponsored jobs posted directly on indeed have 45% more applications than non sponsored jobs. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed and get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility@ Indeed.com NPR terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need.
Pop Culture Happy Hour: Terrible But Bingeable TV Shows
Host/Author: NPR
Release Date: March 6, 2025
Pop Culture Happy Hour, NPR's beloved discussion platform for all things entertainment, dives deep into the paradox of why certain TV shows, despite their glaring flaws, captivate audiences to binge-watch them from start to finish. In the episode titled "Terrible But Bingeable TV Shows," hosts Glenn Weldon, Linda Holmes, Stephen Thompson, and Aisha Harris explore this intriguing phenomenon, sharing their personal experiences with particularly subpar yet irresistibly watchable series.
Glenn Weldon sets the stage by questioning the magnetic pull of certain TV shows: "What is it about a show that turns you into a bitter ender, that keeps you dutifully watching every last episode?" (00:52). He introduces the theme of the episode—discussing TV shows that they continued to watch despite recognizing their lack of quality.
Linda Holmes takes the floor to discuss her pick: Married by America, a 2003 Fox reality show she previously covered (03:07). The show attempted to innovate the reality TV landscape by having single individuals get "engaged" to partners chosen by their families, all under the guise of making genuine connections. However, Linda criticizes the show for its lack of authenticity and depth:
“But the thing that made it really special in the end was that in the end no one got married. So it was a show called Married by America in which no one got married... it was very, very low class.” (05:24)
Stephen Thompson echoes these sentiments, comparing it to shows like Love is Blind and branding it as an "objectively terrible show" that struggled with a coherent vision (07:53).
Linda adds an interesting note on the show's disappearance from modern platforms:
“They have really tried to take some of these shows and sort of suck them into a hole of. We never did that. You can't just find it. Like you think Disney stuff's in the vault. This is in a vault.” (08:40)
This scarcity adds a layer of mystique and nostalgia, making the show a guilty pleasure only a select few remember.
Aisha Harris introduces her choice: Teen Mom 2, now merged into Teen the Next Chapter and Teen Mom Family Reunion (09:36). Unlike Married by America, Teen Mom 2 holds a more complex position in reality TV. Aisha reflects on her continued viewership, attributing it to her investment in the personal growth and real-life challenges faced by the participants:
“I have become somewhat invested in these women's lives and how some of them have really been able to seem as though they've stepped up in many ways and they've found partners and found some happiness.” (09:36)
She also highlights the show's cultural relevance, noting how it mirrors the rise of influencer culture and the commodification of motherhood:
“It's very much kind of aligns with the Kardashian effect. And like the era when we were people started becoming famous for being parents... it's similar to the Kardashians, but on a different pay scale.” (11:30)
Aisha's nuanced take underscores that even within "bad" reality TV, there can be elements that resonate on a deeper level, providing both entertainment and social commentary.
Stephen Thompson presents Designated Survivor as his pick—a scripted political drama starring Kiefer Sutherland that ultimately became a case study in television mismanagement (14:52). Initially promising with its high-stakes premise of a sudden political ascension following a catastrophic event, the show failed due to constant shifts in creative direction:
“...over the course of that season. It would be completely impossible. And yet we watched every episode. It was like Appointment TV. We didn't watch it, like, as it aired on network television with commercials and stuff, but we would stream every single episode, and it was bad.” (16:00)
Despite its potential, Designated Survivor suffered from having five different showrunners across three seasons, leading to a disjointed narrative and inconsistent character development. The hosts discuss how this lack of direction made the show an unintentional soap opera, where the only redeeming quality was its dramatic unpredictability.
Glenn Weldon offers a broader perspective on the nature of such shows:
“Any time you watch any reality show, your feelings about it are a lot more complicated than it would seem on the surface.” (12:51)
Glenn Weldon introduces Boy Meets Boy, a 2003 reality show from Bravo that attempted to break stereotypes by presenting a dating scenario within the gay community (20:46). The show featured a conventionally attractive gay man choosing a boyfriend from a group of contestants, some of whom were secretly straight.
Linda Holmes critiques the show's shallow premise:
“And if you pick one of the straight men, there is no chance that he actually has any attraction to you, or that there's anything genu about the connection between you or anything like that because he is a straight man.” (20:55)
The hosts discuss the problematic aspects of the show, including its lack of recognition for sexual fluidity and the artificial manipulation by producers to maintain a mix of gay and straight contestants. Despite its flaws, Boy Meets Boy remains a fascinating artifact of early 2000s reality TV experimentation.
Throughout the episode, the hosts delve into the psychology behind why viewers continue to watch “terrible” shows. Linda Holmes attributes it to the "train wreck" allure—a compelling disaster that's hard to look away from. Stephen Thompson adds that overcomplicated narratives, like those in Designated Survivor, can be strangely addictive despite their poor execution.
Aisha Harris reflects on how certain shows reinforce personal beliefs or decisions, using her continued viewership of Teen Mom 2 as a reinforcement of her choice not to have children, turning the viewing experience into a form of affirmation.
Glenn Weldon ties these discussions together by highlighting the mix of curiosity, emotional investment, and sometimes ethical dilemmas that keep viewers engaged:
“There's a lot more to these feelings than meets the eye. Some shows become a guilty pleasure, others a social experiment, and some just become part of a show’s growing legend.” (General Insight)
In wrapping up, the hosts acknowledge that while these shows may lack traditional quality metrics, their ability to engage and entertain persists. Whether it’s the chaotic charm of Married by America, the evolving narratives of Teen Mom 2, the convoluted plotting of Designated Survivor, or the stereotypical antics of Boy Meets Boy, each show offers a unique lens into the complex relationship between television content and viewer loyalty.
As Glenn Weldon aptly summarizes:
“We want to know what TV shows you begrudgingly watched to their conclusion.” (24:46)
The episode not only celebrates the infamous yet irresistible nature of these shows but also invites listeners to reflect on their own viewing habits and the reasons behind their television loyalties.
Pop Culture Happy Hour continues to explore the multifaceted world of entertainment, dissecting both its triumphs and its missteps. This episode on "Terrible But Bingeable TV Shows" provides a humorous yet insightful examination of why some of the worst television can become the most addictive.