D (19:00)
If you're using transcription engines today like Whisper or one of the ASR providers today, and even some of the big ASR providers from the Googles of the world, Microsoft's of the world, you don't have to Massage the output as much. That's exactly the word that we had to think about because the raw output was pretty crappy. And we had to fix the grammar, we had to fix the punctuation, we had to figure out speaker identification at the time. So you're just getting a garbled up string of text and you're trying to make sense of that. And you also have to figure out how to identify certain type of words because for certain industries, certain work domains, there are different types of words that are out there. How do you deal with filler words? Pauses, ums, like, we speak a lot of filler words. I feel like working on Fireflies has improved the way I speak and helped reduce the number of filler words I use. Because the first versions of Fireflies, every time I would read the ums and the ahs from my own meeting notes and recordings and transcripts, I'd be like, wow, I said it that many times. So we ended up building a little filter back in the day that told me like how many filler words I used in a meeting. And I would instantly like learn from that and say, oh, wow, I need to learn to speak slower. I need to be more enunciated. So the original text that was generated from transcription engines wasn't good enough. So we had to build a bunch of our own filters on top to clean up the output that was generated. And then we had to build other layers on top that would classify different parts of the meetings and then pull out what it thought were action items, what it thought were bullet point notes, what it thought were key ideas. And at the time it was very extractive, meaning you're just extracting pieces from this garbled up text and then you're calling that notes. And it's a shame, but at the time that was good enough for a lot of people. So we had to build, rebuild, re architect things many times over. Whereas if a person was doing something today off the shelf, you don't have to do all of that. You can get to 80% pretty solid just using off the shelf parts. And that is something that we didn't have the luxury of. Now you may ask, well, Krish, if it's so easy now to build something 80%, 85% off the shelf, what's the competitive moat? Everyone should be able to do this. And I think the part there that we were fortunate enough, one is going really deep on the problem because the other 15% actually takes a long time. That differentiates good versus great. And you have to really Polish the product and. And those things take a very, very long time. And you have to learn from your users the roadmap that we've been able to build out beyond the core tech for teams for enterprises, that takes a lot of work. You have to think about access controls, privacy, storage. How do you think about multi tenant? Like we're one of the first Companies to get SOC2 compliance in the AI meeting assistance space and then HIPAA for doctors that want to use Fireflies. We offer this option for enterprises called private storage, where you can store Fireflies meetings inside your own server storage containers, which was another architectural change. If you don't architect it correctly in the beginning, it makes it very, very difficult. All this administrative sharing features, team features, which makes Fireflies more valuable as more and more people inside your organization start using it. Search was a really big problem that you have to solve over time as well. So all of this is enabled by great transcription and being able to understand language. I absolutely agree with that. But then all the use cases, you have to build on top of it. Like our ASPAD example where you can, instead of reviewing the notes or the meeting, you can just ask Fred questions about the meeting and it will catch you up on everything that happened. Right. So that required a lot of stuff like figuring out search from scratch and making that really effective. So yeah, I think it was a big journey in terms of building out like these core building blocks. But as we were able to do that when we started, it was a blue ocean and going back to. I'm like pogo, sticking back between the commercial and technology part because both are really important if you want to be a great artist, you don't have to think about the commercialization of what you're building. You can just think about great art. But to build a great business, you have to be a good artist. And you also have to figure out, can someone pay me money for this? We were fortunate enough at the time to establish the AI NoteTaker brand and be one of the first companies to start championing that word. And now it's an entire category. Build that AI note taker, get to distribution, get to millions of people using Fireflies. Today, like tens of millions of people get notes every month from Fireflies. That in itself, right? Distribution is something that is super important. And because we started early, when it was less obvious, we were able to make the most of it. There's no point in going to the gold rush after it's been announced and after someone's made a ton of money off of it or a killing off of it. I think being there a little early helped us maximize the impact because for every nth note taker, every additional note taker that comes out, it becomes progressively harder for them to stand out in the crowd. And there is something to be said about these markets where distribution is one of the most important things to build in a PLG flywheel. That's why you don't see so many calendly competitors. People still use Calendly like it's one of the de facto platforms that everyone uses. In our space. There's probably like three or so big players with Fireflies being one of them and then each has its own merits. Fireflies, for example, is very much focused on teams and businesses and if you need robust integrations and workflows and admin controls, you come to Fireflies. Whereas if you're looking for more of a prosumer type product, you'll go to one of the other platforms. So we had to pick what we wanted to do and go really deep in there. A good parallel I like to use also is like the project management space or the CRM space where you had Salesforce build a massive enterprise scale business and then HubSpot comes along and takes a huge market out of the SMB business. Both are tens of billions of dollars in market value that's been captured in project management. You have the asanas of the world, you have the Monday.coms of the world, you have all of these like other project management systems that follow. So we've found our niche, I would say, I wouldn't even say it's a niche because our niche is anyone that's a knowledge worker that works inside of a team. So we specifically say no to consumer grade use cases like university students teaching, like those sort of stuff. Like our bread and butter has always been like if you're a team. And it doesn't have to be in tech either. Like a lot of our customers are outside of tech, which was also really fascinating to see. But yeah, it's been a very long, tedious journey. I wouldn't have believed three years ago we'd be where we are today. But to answer your question on tech, yeah, it's been one of the most fascinating things about this space because now it feels super easy and everyone can do it.