E (3:20)

Yes, thank you. I think it's very important to step back from the day to day and see these cycles and the orders and so on. So I appreciate your question. There are five big forces that create the orders where that we're talking about. There's a monetary order, there's a debt cycle. There is a political and social order within countries. There is an international geopolitical order. There is acts of nature. Throughout history, droughts, floods and pandemics have been more disruptive, killed more people than wars, and can't be ignored as a factor. And number five, technology, and all of those are operating and they operate in a cycle. So on the 1st, there is a debt cycle that I will describe and people should consider the merit of that. I have done very well in a macro way of Anticipating the 2008 financial crisis, European debt crisis, and so on by understanding this. Okay, the way it works is that the credit system is like a circulatory system that brings nutrients, buying power to different parts of the economy. And if that money is borrowed and used to create productivity that produces income, then there's debt service. You make the debt service payments and you do better and you make profits, and it's a healthy system. When, on the other hand, debts and debt service rise relative to income, you see, the debt service is like plaque in the circulatory system in that it squeezes out spending. So in other words, income minus debt service becomes less. And so as a result, it squeezes out spending and there's a supply and a demand. In other words, right now we have a certain amount of debt. One man's debts are another man's assets. They have those holding them, expect to have a good return, and then you have to sell more. And when you have to sell a lot more, there's a supply demand issue. And when those two things happen together, it's like plaque in the system. And then number three is the world order. In other words, how countries deal with each other. And throughout all history, there are great conflicts, wars, and then after the war, there's a new order. The power in the United states, for example, 1945, created a new monetary order, created a new world order. And that was a multilateral world order that was designed almost to some ways replicate the US Approach to representative democracy. The creating of the United nations multilateral organizations, including, can you imagine, the World Court or the World bank or the World Trade Organization or the World Health Organization. That's all over. And it was in some ways naive because there was, if there's no you take a vote and there's no enforcement mechanism, of course that's not going to work in the dominant power. So that's the third. So we have changed the world order to a world order that was analogous to pre1945, which is a power rules kind of world order. Number four, I told you about the acts of nature. And then, of course, number five is technology. They all have great implications. Technology can greatly reduce, can greatly improve productivity. And if those productivity creates incomes and so on, it can help greatly. And similarly, productivity, the use of AI and other ways can be used for war or can be used for other purposes. So that is the cycle. So now as we come into it, we see these things happening. They cannot be, should not be looked at individually. In other words, in focusing something like Iran on the war with Iran, we can lose sight of the fact that while it's very important, it's part of a world war. In other words, there are sides, China, Russia, Iran and other countries, Korea, North Korea and the like. And then there are other sides to that and that there are conflicts. And so the implications that this has are very profound. I was just in Asia for about a month meeting with different kinds of different world leaders and so on. And the implications of what is now happening with Iran and the United States and so on, are very profound for that world order. And we can, I'm sure, talk about it. So thank you for letting me get that picture out. And we can now zoom in on whatever you want to talk about.

D (8:54)

Well, it's very helpful because, I mean, with each force, very, very obvious examples come to mind. I mean, with the first force, the thing that comes to mind is the fact that, as I said, the national debt has surpassed, surpassed $39 trillion. We're sitting at a record high in the US and our annual deficit spend so far, at least in the first half of the fiscal year was $1.3 trillion. So it's clear where we're headed on a debt perspective there in terms of the internal order. It's clear for most to see that there is more and more polarization both between the left and the right, but also between the rich and the poor. We've Seen some pretty disturbing attacks on CEOs lately, which I believe is at least somewhat indicative of, of sentiment within the US Starting to fray. And then I mean, you talk about on an international scale, we have a war with Iran, which is also coming off of a moment at Davos where most of the leaders got together and said the thing that you said and have been predicting for many years, which is that the world order as we know it is coming apart. This era of globalism is coming to an end. And even its proponents were the people who said outright, yes, this era is coming to an end. So I guess my takeaway is the big cycle is happening. The things that you have been talking about, they are occurring. And the question for me then becomes, well, where are we in the big cycle? What stage are we actually at and what are the, what are these events that we have seen in the real world actually say to, to us and what does it mean for investors?

E (10:36)

We are on the brink now. The brink might be, I would say, particularly risky period is between the next two elections. So between after the 26 midterm election and the 28 presidential election is a riskier period. And this is a very risky period. So what I would say if I take the monetary order risk, we have debt service problems, they have big changes and we'll get into this who is earning a lot of money, who is not earning money, how wealth has changed. For example, it's very interesting and very important that to, to observe that the Chinese are making a tremendous amount of money accumulating they running very large surpluses with the rest of the world and accumulating a lot of dollars. And what does that mean in terms of how those are handled? And then what does that mean for our balances and so on. But if I'm back to your to try to be on point, I would say in the midterm elections we're going to. There's a likelihood that the Republicans will lose the House and that there will be great conflicts, including, you know, impeachments, investigations and so on, that the conflict is going to be material. I think that the monetary situation will be more threatening. In other words, there's itself the supply demand that we're referring to the United states. Basically the U.S. government spends 7 trillion. It takes in about 5 trillion. So it's 40% overspending. It has a lot of debt and the demand for that debt is falling. And it's falling not only because of the supply demand situation, the regular supply demand, but we're now in a World where even wars, the worries of those who are holding dollar denominated debt that they could be sanctioned. Like imagine if you're holding, if you're Chinese and you're holding it and you could have a conflict. So these, there are these shifts that are happening in terms of that. So that plays a role. And of course there is the international conflict and of course technology is changing at an incredible rate. And so I think that as we take the next two to three years, it will be like going through a time warp that we're going to have a riskier period, but also a period of great changes that we, you know, are difficult to deal with. And particularly I think the question is how you deal with that, to have a well diversified portfolio. But in answer to your question, so sort of long winded answer, but I think that we're going to, we're on the brink of some of these problems and we are, I would say, you know, particularly in the vicinity of, you know, two years away from what obviously is a confluence of more. More risks.

D (14:25)

Yes. Yeah. My next question is what does this mean for portfolio management? Just thinking long term, if we are seeing a decrease in demand for US Debt, if we're also seeing more US debt issuance, if we're also seeing more global conflict around the world generally these are very, very large forces that are very difficult to sort of wrap your. What does it mean for an investor? What is an investment thesis or investment decision that you can make that might protect you from a portfolio perspective?

E (14:57)

I think the most important thing for most individuals is not to market time. A lot of these things, they're not going to be successful of it. They get excited if a war happens and all of that. That the most important thing is to have a well diversified, well structured portfolio and to look at the assets in the portfolio in relationship to each other. For example, as an inclination. I would say how much gold do you have in the portfolio? You shouldn't have too much and you shouldn't have too little. But it is an effective diversifier to other assets that you probably do have in a portfolio. Because when you have a bad set of circumstances, gold tends to do well because of either the debt problem or the world war problems and so on and so forth. And not to market time gold, but to basically realize that it's a currency. It's not only a long term currency, but today it's the second largest reserve currency held by central banks. First dollars, then gold, then euros, then Japanese yen. And to have for example, somewhere between 5 and 15% of that portfolio in that diversifies the other parts of it. I would worry about debt and you should understand cash, which people think is the safest investment, is the most assuredly bad investment in most times normally because cash has a lower return, but it's particularly a bad investment in a period of stagflation. So we're dealing with kind of a stagflation kind of environment or an uncertain but to achieve and debt has its challenges. So I would say the most important thing is to know how to diversify well and that also includes local, you know, outside of the United States as well as inside of the United States. That may seem very difficult to people because also right now there's a lot of concentration in the areas like tech, in other words, and particularly AI. And one might figure, okay, that you're going to miss out on that. But still the diversification is of very much importance because I think a lot of people make the mistake of thinking that because a technology is going to be a revolutionary technology. Throughout history so many new technologies have been revolutionary technologies and it's certainly the case that that'll happen. Such periods have also been periods of bubbles that because people think I want to bet on that technology so they buy stocks in that of that sort without looking really at the price.

D (18:14)

Right.

E (18:15)

So to create a well balanced portfolio, what I call an all weather portfolio, I think is the most important thing that people can do.

D (18:25)

Lots more we could get into, but we will have to continue it another time. Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates and New York Times bestselling author. Ray, thank you so much for joining us again on Profit G Markets. We always love having you, Ed.

E (18:40)

It's my pleasure.

D (18:42)

After the break, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon and Google report earnings. And by the way, we are heading out on tour at the end of day the May. So for more info and to get tickets to a show near you, head to Prof. G Marketstore.com. Support for this show comes from Vanta. If you run a business, you don't need us to tell you that risk and regulation are rising. More and more customers expect clear proof of security before they'll commit. Building that trust is essential to closing deals, but it can also be costly, confusing and time consuming. Vanta says they can help. Vanta automates your compliance process to bring compliance, risk and customer Trust together on one AI powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SoC2 or running an enterprise GRC program, Vanta keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. And with continuous monitoring, Vanta helps with real time reporting and security reviews. You can share installation instead of searching through audits and spreadsheets, you get a system working quietly in the background, keeping you compliant, reducing risk and helping your business grow faster. With confidence, you can get started at vanta.com markets that's V A N-T-A.com markets vanta.com markets

C (20:09)

I'm Mitch, first two time Indigo champion, championship MVP and forward for the US women's national team. Before I went pro, I graduated from Harvard with a degree in psychology, which comes in handy more than you think. Any athlete pursuing greatness knows there's a certain mentality you have to have. What people don't know is what that costs. In my podcast, Confessions of an Elite Athlete, I sit down with the best athletes in the world and explore the psychology, mindset and unseen battles on the path to greatness. So take a seat and learn from the Confessions of an elite athlete on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.

F (20:58)

I'm Maria Sharapova and I'm hosting a new podcast called Pretty Tough. Every week I'm sitting down with trailblazing women at the top of their game to discuss ambition, work ethic, and the ups and downs that come on the path to achieving greatness. We'll dive into their stories and get valuable insights from top executives, actors, entrepreneurs and other individuals who have inspired me so much in my own journey. Follow Pretty Tough wherever you get your podcasts.

D (21:32)

We're back with Profg Markets. Many of the world's most valuable companies reported strong earnings yesterday, but investors didn't seem too impressed. Microsoft beat on the top and bottom lines with revenue up 18% year over year. However, the stock slipped 2% after hours. Amazon also topped expectations with stronger than expected cloud growth, but its shares fell around 1% after hours. Meta posted a standout quarter with revenue surging 33% from a year ago, but higher than expected. Capex and Disapp user growth sent the stock down nearly 7% after hours. Google was the exception. Revenue beat estimates cloud sales topped $20 billion and the stock rose over 6% after hours. So lots to unpack here. We're speaking with Gil Luria, head of Technology Research at DA Davidson. Gil, good to see you again. Lots to get into here. I mean, the thing that strikes me immediately is that these numbers, these growth numbers especially are just mind blowing. I mean, Google their Cloud revenues up 63%, Microsoft Azure revenue up 40%. Like these are crazy numbers, but based on the after hours trading, I guess investors aren't that Excited about it. What do you make of these earnings and how the markets have reacted so far?

G (22:56)

Oh, the curse of high expectations. Yes. Microsoft's growing $100 billion business 40%, Amaz growing $140 billion business 27% and Google's growing an $80 billion business 63%. So incredible growth rates and really important to point out they're all doing it at higher margins than previously, which, which means that that concern that we had of oh, the AI business isn't as good of a business and because of all this investment, the depreciation, the margins won't be as good as. No, they're all managing this growth so well that they're accelerating growth with higher margins. And this will go very importantly to this notion of return on investment. Right. If these companies can accelerate growth at the same margin, that means they are getting a return on investment on AI. But to your point, Google's the one that's the star of the show today because they're doing so much better than anybody else, not just in Google cloud, they're also still seeing acceleration in advertising revenue. Their search this accelerated to 19%. That's a massive business still accelerating. It's catching up to Meta. If Meta's growth in ad used to be twice as high as Google, now they're converging. And Google also started talking about selling TPUs. This is something we start talking about a year ago as a wild idea and, and now Google's actually doing it. So, so their chips are so good that they have demand for those chips. So Google's the star of the show. It's just making everybody else look not quite as good in comparison.

D (24:34)

I mean it seems as though you have to just bet on these companies like just to sort of take a step back. I mean when I think about all of the things that we were kind of worried about and we were worried about the AI build out and we were worried about the capex and are they going to see the ROI on their investments? And it seems as though we're getting to the point where it's just like, yeah, the ROI is there, these businesses are growing at absurd rates and you don't really have a choice like you have to bet on these companies which sort of adds to my confusion a little bit in some of those after hours moves and I wonder if that will probably change maybe during the day, maybe during the rest of the week. I mean, it's sort of a simple question. I mean, can you, how could you not bet on big tech at this point? At this stage in the game.

G (25:28)

No, that's exactly right. So let's first of all just treat the three Microsoft, Amazon and Google as one category. Again, they're getting terrific returns on their capex. They're probably going to increase capex. Google has already said they will. And so that's one category. Meta's different. Meta doesn't actually sell its data center capacity. They're all using it for internal purposes. And part of what investors don't like about their report is that Met is again increasing its capex without showing the corresponding acceleration in revenue. So they're increasing capex without acceleration in revenue. While Google, Microsoft and Amazon have much better case for why they're expanding their capex. But to your broader point, yes, the big techs are the ones that are capturing all the value, first and foremost, not reporting today. But the chip companies, Nvidia, Broadcom, amd, Intel, Micron, they're capturing a lot of the value. And then the big providers of AI compute because Microsoft, Amazon, Google, they're the ones that provide everybody compute. Not just OpenAI anthropic, but any company that wants to do AI in house is using capacity from one of those three one way or another. So yes, the returns there are good. That's coming across clear. And today again, expectations were super high for Microsoft and Amazon and they didn't quite achieve them. For Meta, it's a little different. The results weren't great and they're again increasing capex.

D (27:03)

One of the things that we saw when we launched this war in Iran was a lot of these names fell. I mean, basically the markets as a whole fell, but a lot of that pain was seen among the tech companies. And then they started to rebound. As I it seems as though investors started to realize like this probably doesn't matter for these companies. This is the first time where we've gotten to see what those impacts actually were. It seems like there's been no impact. I mean, is there any relationship between what we're seeing in terms of the war in Iran and the broader impacts that that's having on the on on the global economy versus big tech? Or is big tech just completely insulated? It's its own thing.

G (27:46)

They're very insulated.

D (27:47)

Right.

G (27:47)

Oil is not an input for these companies. Their exposure is only the second order. Exp. If the global economy was to slow down, then ad sales to Meta and Google would slow down. Retail and Amazon would slow down and some aspects of Microsoft business would slow down. But there's no direct impact on these companies. Their Driver again by a mile is the growth in demand for AI compute. And that seems to have very little to do with the conflict in the Middle East. And so they are mostly insulated from this unless we have a big deterioration in the overall economy, which doesn't look like it's in the cards right right now.

D (28:26)

Are there any of these companies that stand out to you from a valuation perspective at this point? Do these earnings maybe give any detail or color on how we should feel about the valuations?

G (28:36)

Yeah, Microsoft really stands out. I mean Google by the time it opens for trading tomorrow and Amazon are trading at high 20s or even in the 30s on an afford multiple. While Microsoft is trading in the low 20s in spite of the fact that they overall have comparable growth rates. They're all growing in the high teens and Microsoft is not getting the credit for it. Part of it is that there's a software business there. People are very down on software, as you've discussed many times on your show. And then there's all the CapEx concerns. But from a valuation perspective, Google and Amazon trading at relatively high multiples. Microsoft still at a low multiple. That's why I prefer them. Meta is also trading at a low multiple, but again part of it is this lack of discipline around spending which which investors are reluctant to embrace, especially right now.

D (29:29)

What do you make of Microsoft actually the capex coming in lower than expected. It seems like Microsoft might be pulling back or at least compared to Meta in terms of investments in AI. Or is that the wrong read?

G (29:42)

It's more likely has to do with the bottlenecks of building out data centers right now. There's so much competition for resources. We heard from intel last week that they had to take some CPUs out of the trash in order to meet. We can look at memory prices quadrupling within a year and we're seeing all these bottlenecks to mention turbines and power generation and advanced packaging. There's all these bottle. There's states that are that have this NIMBY approach of we don't want a data center here and we're not going to allow data centers. All these companies are encountering it at one level or another. For Microsoft, that just ended up slowing down the rate of, of data center construction. But given the size of demand, given the growth in demand, it's probably just a matter pushing those data center into future quarters as opposed to reducing capex as a policy.

D (30:34)

All right, big week. Gil Luria, head of technology research at DA Davidson. Gil, always appreciate your time. Thank you. Thank you. Well, the big story for investors this week is of course, big tech earnings. The four companies we just discussed make up for nearly a fifth of the entire s and P500. So naturally it's those four companies that we care about. But there is another company that is also proving to be systemic to the stock market. A company that actually isn't even traded on the stock market. And that company is OpenAI. Indeed, the AI startup that is yet to go public is proving to be one of the most structurally critical companies in the market, to the point where even small details about the business are eliminating hundreds of billions of dollars of market value. Yesterday, for example, the Wall Street Journal reported that OpenAI had missed its revenue target in 2025. And as a result, we saw huge declines. Not in OpenAI stock, which isn't public, but in other stocks, some of which are the most important companies in the world. Nvidia, for example, fell 4% on the news. Oracle fell 6%, Core we fell 7%, and SoftBank fell 12%. In fact, when you add up the market value that was erased, it comes out to nearly $400 billion. All because of one report about one company that isn't even publicly traded. Now that is somewhat concerning, but it raises a more concerning question, and that is, what will happen to the markets when OpenAI is publicly traded? How will investors react when they are, say, required to report their revenue every quarter? Or when they do have to tell us how much they actually plan to spend on compute over the next five years? Will investors be more excited than they are right now, or less excited? That is the trillion dollar question which will determine not only the value of this company, but also the value of of many other companies, from Nvidia to Oracle to Microsoft. Now, I don't know the answer to that question, but so far, each time we've gotten just a peek under the hood of OpenAI, such as this week, the reaction has been pretty negative. And yet, despite the CFO's concerns, the plan is still for OpenAI to go public this year. And when they do, investors won't just get to have a peek under the hood. They will conduct a full scale examination of the company. They will inspect the business and all of its flaws from every single angle. So that will be a critical test for OpenAI, but more importantly, it will also be a critical test for the rest of the stock market. If OpenAI passes that test, then we are in the clear. Markets will inevitably rip higher. But if they fail that test, well, this week's events should make it quite clear. The stock market as we know it today could start to come apart. Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss, edited by Joel Patterson and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Brad Williams. Our research team is Dan Shalon, Isabella Kinsel, Kristen o' Donoghue and Mia Silverio. And our social media producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Prof. G Markets from Prof. G. Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. And tune in tomorrow for our conversation with Reid Hoffman.