Aschenbrenner’s AI Fund Collapse Is Just The Beginning

Summary

Prof G Markets — Episode Summary

Episode Title: Aschenbrenner’s AI Fund Collapse Is Just The Beginning
Date: August 4, 2026
Hosts: Ed Elson
Guests: Michael Green (Chief Strategist, Simplify Asset Management), Katie Martin (Markets columnist, Financial Times)

---

Episode Overview

This episode explores the dramatic implosion of Leopold Aschenbrenner's AI-focused hedge fund, 'Situational Awareness,' which dissolved after a massive leveraged bet on AI infrastructure went south. The conversation uses this event as a lens to examine the dangers of leverage, the explosive growth of leveraged ETFs, and the potential for broader market contagion—highlighting parallels to a recent crisis in South Korea. In the second half, the episode pivots to analyze the U.S. Treasury’s rare intervention in support of Japan’s collapsing yen, unpacking geopolitics, currency strategy, and the shifting dynamics of global finance.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Collapse of Aschenbrenner’s AI Fund

• Event Summary (02:00–04:10):

  • Aschenbrenner’s hedge fund reported a 439% net return for H1 2026 but lost $35B in assets within a week, collapsing from $45B to only $10B and triggering a forced liquidation.
  • The fund was highly leveraged (up to 400%) on AI infrastructure bets.

• Why It Happened: Michael Green’s Analysis (04:10–06:19):

  • The fund moved from private equity (low-volatility) to heavily leveraged public equities (high-volatility).
  • A small price decline triggered margin calls and forced selling, creating a downward spiral.
  • Both his long and short positions backfired as the market moved against him, worsened by the forced liquidation.
  • Quote: “Nobody in their right mind should give a 25-year-old $20 billion at 4x leverage, but you actually can’t blame the 24-year-old.” (Michael Green, 05:37)

• Broader Lessons:

  • Market structure and extreme leverage can turn a thesis-driven win into a rapid collapse when momentum reverses.
  • Large portfolios attract ‘sharks’—other market participants who target forced sellers.

---

2. The Dangers of Leverage and Leveraged ETFs

• Leveraged ETFs and Their Role (06:19–11:40):

  • Leveraged ETFs must rebalance daily, compounding volatility drag—small swings wipe out capital at high leverage.
  • Retail investors, inspired by outlier success stories, are increasingly buying (and holding) these ETFs rather than “harvesting” volatility like pros.
  • Memorable Illustration: Michael Green walks listeners through the math of 3–4x leverage, showing how volatility drag creates deeply negative returns unless massive gains are achieved.

• Global Example — South Korea’s Meltdown (10:48–11:40):

  • South Korea’s Kospi crashed 44% due to widespread use of leveraged ETFs among retail investors, leading to mass margin calls, account liquidations, and public outcry.
  • South Korea banned leveraged ETFs and repeatedly closed the market to stabilize.

• Policy & Regulation:

  • The U.S. market still embraces such products under “market fundamentalism.”
  • Quote: "We have created effectively a gambling environment in which people are increasingly nihilistic in their interpretation of prices." (Michael Green, 12:36)
  • Leverage as a tool can be useful for professionals; for retail, it is akin to giving “a hammer… to someone who doesn’t know how to use it.”

---

3. Is the U.S. Next?

• Rising Leveraged ETF Popularity (14:22–14:49):

  • U.S. leveraged ETF assets reached $218B, up 60% since March—mirroring conditions seen before South Korea’s crisis.

• Michael Green’s Outlook (14:49–16:08):

  • Passive, price-insensitive investment vehicles can create dangerous feedback loops.
  • Some pressures in global markets (e.g., South Korea) are traced to U.S.-listed ETFs and cross-border capital flows.
  • Regulatory scrutiny may follow as similar systemic risks emerge.

---

4. U.S. & Japanese Yen Intervention

• Background (19:53–20:39):

  • The Japanese yen hit a 40-year low. Japan intervened, spending $59B to shore it up, with the U.S. Treasury joining for the first time since 2011.

• Katie Martin’s Take (21:05–23:47):

  • The intervention signals alliance solidarity (“we help our friends”), but also speaks to U.S. self-interest.
  • Japan avoiding rate hikes means it has to sell U.S. Treasuries to support the yen—a risk for U.S. debt markets.
  • Quote: “The last thing the US wants is for Japan to dump a load of new Treasuries onto the market. So I think that’s why they’re getting involved here.” (Katie Martin, 22:46)

• Mechanics & Novelty (26:54–28:06):

  • U.S. intervention used euros (not dollars) to buy yen—a bizarre, unprecedented move made because their intervention fund is in euros and yen.
  • Quote: “This is a total curveball. I have never heard of any country intervening in anyone else’s market using a third-party currency before. This is a new one on me, new one to everyone I’ve spoken to…” (Katie Martin, 27:05)

---

5. Geopolitics, Debt, and Who Gets Help

• Debt, Financial Power, and Politics (28:06–33:23):
  • Despite heavy U.S. debt, America still controls the dominant reserve currency and can intervene with “financial firepower.”
  • Who the U.S. bails out or helps may depend more on politics (e.g., Japan’s new PM’s pro-Trump stance, Argentina’s pre-election support) than pure economics.
  • US intervention signals “protection” for friendlier countries, potentially altering global trading and investment strategies.
  • Quote: “There are very clearly financial benefits to making nice with the US, but also the US is clearly very sensitive to any possibility that any major buyers of U.S. treasuries… could not even dump their Treasuries, but just feel a need not to buy quite so many Treasuries in future.” (Katie Martin, 31:35)

---

6. Trump Monetizes Social Media Data

• Late Segment (33:46–36:43):
  • Trump Media’s Truth API now sells early access to his market-moving social media posts to Wall Street traders for $100k+/month.
  • Ed Elson decries the normalization of corruption and reminds listeners to persist in caring about regulatory oversight: “The only thing left between America becoming a literal third world nation isn’t regulation that’s been gutted… it’s you and your ability to care.”

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

| Timestamp | Speaker | Quote | |-----------|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 05:37 | Michael Green | “Nobody in their right mind should give a 25-year-old $20 billion at 4x leverage…” | | 10:48 | Ed Elson | “It seems like South Korea is the perfect example of how this all goes wrong…” | | 12:36 | Michael Green | “We have created effectively a gambling environment in which people are increasingly nihilistic…” | | 22:46 | Katie Martin | “The last thing the US wants is for Japan to dump a load of new Treasuries onto the market…” | | 27:05 | Katie Martin | “This is a total curveball. I have never heard of any country intervening using a third-party currency…” | | 31:35 | Katie Martin | “There are very clearly financial benefits to making nice with the US, but also the US is clearly very sensitive to any possibility that any major buyers of U.S. treasuries… could not even dump their Treasuries, but just feel a need not to buy quite so many Treasuries in future.” | | 35:50 | Ed Elson | “The only thing left between America becoming a literal third world nation isn’t regulation... it’s you and your ability to care.” |

---

Segment Timestamps

• Market news & Aschenbrenner collapse intro: 01:56–04:10
• Michael Green on leverage & collapse: 04:10–11:40
• South Korea & levered ETF catastrophe: 10:48–14:22
• US market risks & ETF growth: 14:22–16:08
• US/Japan yen intervention & geopolitics: 19:53–33:23
• Trump monetizes social media data: 33:46–36:43

---

Tone & Style

• Clear, direct, and slightly sardonic analysis—cutting through market jargon (“no-BS analysis”)
• Ed Elson injects wry commentary, particularly on the spectacle (and ethics) of Trump’s data sales and market structures.
• Guest experts balance technical explanation with relatable analogies (“a hammer…is a very dangerous tool if used improperly”).

---

Summary Takeaways

1. Excessive leverage—particularly among young/inexperienced managers—remains as dangerous as ever, especially amplified by market structure and mass adoption by retail investors.
2. Leveraged ETFs, while having their place for professionals, can create systemic risk and are an increasingly global problem.
3. Political and financial entanglements mean interventions are motivated by a mix of alliance solidarity and self-interest, with implications for the stability of dollar and global debt markets.
4. Regulation and oversight are failing to keep pace, normalizing behaviors—from financialization of tweets to unrestrained risk—that threaten market stability.

This episode is a must-listen for anyone concerned about the new frontiers of risk—and politics—in global finance.

Transcript

[Ed Elson]

Foreign.

[Michael Green]

What's driving the markets this week? What's on investors minds as they look ahead? Find out on the Markets podcast from Goldman Sachs.

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

A breakdown of market moves and macro

[Michael Green]

signals in 10 minutes or less. The Markets podcast from Goldman Sachs.

[Odoo Advertiser]

Listen.

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

Now.

[Ed Elson]

You know that feeling.

[Michael Green]

Too many updates, too many meetings, too many things falling through the cracks. Monday.com was built for that gap, the

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

AI work platform designed from the ground

[Ed Elson]

up for people and agents to work

[Michael Green]

side by side and deliver more together. Drafting the brief, flagging risks, running a competitive scan.

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

Your agent can do it all.

[Michael Green]

And the best part, anyone can build one. Even you.

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

Try it.

[Michael Green]

Create your first Monday agent [e-mail]

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

recommendations can be amazing. I mean, maybe someone recommended that TV show you've been obsessed with lately. But when it comes to home projects, it's different. If you don't like a show, you might lose a few minutes. If you hire a friend of a friend of a friend to fix a leaky ceiling, you could end up with a flooded kitchen. Maybe I know a guy. Just isn't enough for your home. That's why thumbtack works so well. They'll match you with a top rated local pro and you can see photos of past work credentials and reviews all right in the app. For your next home project, try thumbtack. Hire the right pro today.

[Michael Green]

Money markets matter.

[Ed Elson]

If money is evil, then that building is hell.

[Michael Green]

The show goes on.

[Ed Elson]

Welcome to Prof. G Market Experts. I'm Ed elson. It is August 4th. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices climbed after President Trump called off an attack and Iran indicated Hormuz negotiations are making progress. The Dow closed at a record high and Amazon reached a $3 trillion valuation for the first time. Meanwhile, Brent crude fell, the yield on 10 year treasuries declined, and finally the Japanese yen climbed after the US Joined Tokyo to support it. More on that later. Okay, what else is happening? For months investors have been asking how the AI boom might end. And last week they got a glimpse. 24 year old Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund, Situational Awareness, sent a letter to investors on July 24 reporting a 439% net return for the first half of the year. In a postscript, Aschenbrenner wrote that it was, quote, a particularly good time to add funds. But just six days later, the fund had lost roughly $35 billion in assets, plunging from a peak of 45 billion to around $10 billion. And Aschen Brenner was forced to unwind his entire public stock portfolio in a fire sale that ended up going to Ken Griffin's Citadel. Investors are reading this story as a warning sign for for the increasingly debt fueled AI boom. Situational awareness reportedly used as much as 400% leverage to amplify its bets on AI infrastructure. That helped the firm return more than 1,000% since its inception. But when those bets went south, the same leverage accelerated the losses and forced the fund into liquidation. We wanted to talk to someone who manages a fund and who has spent years thinking about leverage and market structure. So we're going to discuss this with Michael Green, Chief strategist and Portfolio Manager for Simplify Asset Management and author of the Yes I Give a Fig substack. Michael, thank you so much for joining us. Let's just start with your initial reactions to the implosion of situational awareness. How did this happen? What can we learn from it?

[Michael Green]

You know, the quick answer is that when you look at somebody who is engaged in the behaviors that Leo has, there's really no mechanism for him to have learned not to do this. And so he had a very strong thesis. He expressed it with the extraordinary use of leverage. His initial, initial exposure was largely to non public entities and he had grown his business under that framework, which has a component of much lower volatility framing to it, because non public entities don't reprice themselves in the same manner. But when you start running strategies that are running that much leverage against this much volatility for the individual securities, unfortunately a blow up becomes inevitable. And it really looks like what happened within Leo's portfolio is that he created conditions under which a small decline in prices would force him to sell to reduce his leverage, which in turn caused prices to fall further, which caused him to be forced to sell to reduce leverage further. And ultimately that cascaded into an event that sent both his longs and his shorts against him. In particular, he very much had the thesis that traditional software companies would be heavily disintermediated by the growth of AI, in particular the software sector that obviously contributed to the underperformance of that sector for a period, his selling actually contributed to the underperformance of that sector. And as he began to be forced to unwind his portfolio, that forced prices to move in the opposite direction of his underlying positioning and created conditions for the rapid collapse of the fund and the need to delever it in as quick a time as he did. Nobody in their right mind should give a 25 year old $20 billion at 4x leverage, but you actually can't blame the 24 year old.

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

Right.

[Michael Green]

The reality is he had a very strong view, he had a very strong conviction on his view and everything in his experience base up to that point had told him that this was the right strategy to pursue. Once you become that large, the street actually identifies you as a target, you effectively become a wounded shark and a feeding frenzy emerges.

[Ed Elson]

You recently wrote a piece about how, I mean many of the stocks that he was invested in, the semi stocks like Nivea, Sandisk, Micron, etc. How a lot of the activity and the volatility that we're seeing in that market has been the result of the rise of leveraged ETFs. Could you talk more about how that is impacting the semiconductor sector right now and why it matters to investors?

[Michael Green]

A levered ETF carries the same characteristics as Leo's portfolio, which is obviously running at 4x leverage. And the difference between the two is that a levered ETF, because it has a prospectus that requires it to maintain that levered exposure, has to rebalance every day. And this is where volatility creates a phenomenon called volatility drag. If you imagine a series in which I make 10% today and lose 10% tomorrow, many people would assume that the answer to that is I now have a zero return. But the reality is I start with $1, I now have $1.10 and I lose 10%. I have 0.999 cents, I've lost a penny. If I add four times leverage to that, you actually end up with a two to the fourth power impact on that volatility drag. Instead of investing $1, I've now invested $1 of equity and $3 of borrowing. I I'm up 10%. Therefore I suddenly have four hundred and forty, meaning my equity has risen. Because I only owe three hundred dollars. My equity has risen to 140. That is a 40% gain on a 10% change in the underlier, exactly as you would anticipate. But if you do the exact same math for what happens now, if I fall 10%, the compounding effect of that leverage and the need to rebalance, it creates the conditions that cause these sorts of catastrophic losses. If then add the additional layers you do with the ETFs that they need to rebalance every single day. It's not like they went from 140 equity with 300 of borrowing, they actually have to lever up that 144x. So four times 140 is going to be 660. Right. So that actually means you were at 440 in terms of your exposure the day before. Now I have to increase my position sizes by nearly 50% to maintain the leverage that I've promised my investors. That means that it creates what's called endogenous flow. It actually forces buying even without new investors adding money into the system and contributes to the sort of run up that we have seen unless investors harvest those gains. And the piece that I wrote about is called a semi theory of everything. In explaining how this phenomenon plays out. When you have large series of complexes that have historically run on this, most professional investors would run the way I described as a volatility harvesting strategy. Taking advantage of the fact that that compounding creates a loss. You actually short both sides of the trade and harvest the volatility loss associated with the volatility drag. It creates a very stable return profile as long as your volatility characteristics are maintained. Unfortunately, in the excitement of the post March recovery in markets early April to be more precise, we actually saw retail investors step into these types of products because they were seeking out a Leopold like experience. They were actually buying these 3x levered ETFs or 2x levered single stock ETFs and then holding rather than harvesting their positions. We actually saw a behavior that suggested people were trying to dollar cost average into these strategies. If you run through the math on this, it is just a terrible way to invest at 3x leverage. Running the level of volatility we were experiencing in the semiconductor space as of April May, you would need a return in excess of 170% a year in order to simply break even on the volatility harvesting to dollar cost average into something that has 170% breakeven is absolutely absurd. But again a byproduct of the lack of education and candidly, the tools that we have put out into the marketplace with an objective to attract people to shin objects as compared to thoughtful investment vehicles.

[Ed Elson]

It seems like South Korea is the perfect example of how this all goes wrong. I mean we saw what happened last week. We saw the Kospi, the South Korean stock market, crashing 44% from its June highs. We saw literally more than a million people in South Korea receiving margin calls, hundreds of thousands seeing their accounts liquidated, liquidated to zero. And we also saw a lot of protest from South Korea after this event. And a lot of people are saying let's abolish these Levitt ETFs, let's get rid of them. How could you let this happen to us? How could you allow us to become addicted to this stuff. Is that the answer? What do we do about these levered ETFs if they are such a dangerous investment strategy?

[Michael Green]

Well, again, it depends on how you use them, right? So a hammer is a very dangerous tool if used improperly. It is a very productive tool if used properly as volatility harvesting regimes and volatility harvesting tools. These can be used by professional investors to effectively short a realized volatility framework and create conditions under which profits can be generated by providing effectively the financing for those vehicles. South Korea has already banned the levered ETFs. They've now been forced to close their market multiple times over the past several weeks after and literally doubling the number of times it had been closed in a three week period. Over its entire history, since roughly 1990, they've recognized that these products have bare, you know, create almost no social utility in the United States. We are still trapped by market fundamentalism. And we see that in everything from Kevin Warsh's recent testimony at the Fed to the general view on regulatory frameworks within the United States. Just let the market decide. There's a very reason we don't do that. There's a reason we now have labeling on drugs that tell us what the addictive contents of them are. We now have labeling on food that tells us what the the ingredient list is. And the reason why is because we used to have the same general view. Buyer beware. You need to be responsible for yourself. Well, that's extremely difficult for an illiterate immigrant to figure out if the sausage that they are eating is filled with potato flour or if it is filled with meat. We recognize that. We took steps to address it. And in many ways I think we often go too far in this. We do need to recognize that there is a role for experimentation and the utility of tools. As I was describing, we could ban hammers because somebody hurt somebody with a hammer. That would be a mistake, I think, under most economic framings. But in this case, we have created effectively a gambling environment in which people are increasingly nihilistic in their interpretation of prices. Effectively assuming in many ways that governments are stepping in to support these prices or simply print money to create wealth to paper over the many problems that we see in our society. You and I have discussed some of those. That's simply untrue. I just would emphasize for the younger audience, never substitute conspiracy when incompetence will suffice. We have regulators who have largely abandoned their role. And as a result, we are left with a series of products that are being created that I would describe as half boiled spaghetti being thrown at the wall in an attempt to see what sticks and attracts investor dollars.

[Ed Elson]

Just looking at what's happening in the U.S. now, assets under management in U.S. leveraged ETFs have reached a record $218 billion, up 60% since the end of March. I mean it continues to explode. All the things that went wrong in South Korea, they're becoming more and more popular in the United States. Are we headed for a South Korea like implosion in the United States?

[Michael Green]

Well, unfortunately, as you know, this is one of the key concerns and it's tied to my work around market structure, the growth of passive and price insensitive and in this case we're referring to leverage vehicles that actually do not consider is what they're buying with leveraging good thing or a bad thing. They're simply fulfilling billing and investment mandate what I call a systematic portfolio rebalancing those create conditions under which these types of feedback loops can play out. And I would highlight to South Korea that actually much of the problem was not generated in South Korea. We imposed these conditions in South Korea through the introduction of an unlevered memory centric ETF DRAM in the United States which exploded in size to almost as large as Leo Aschenbrunner's portfolio and was sending roughly roughly half of its dollars in Korean won hedged terms. So they were selling the currency, buying the stock in Korea. It brings to mind the 1971 experience from US Treasury Undersecretary John Connolly saying to the emerging markets, it's our currency but your problem. This was our ETF and their problem. And I think unfortunately you're going to see the regulatory environment begin to recognize that and it very well may be forced to change.

[Ed Elson]

Michael Green is chief strategist and Portfolio manager for Simplify Asset Management. He's also the author of the Yes I Give a Fig substack. Michael, we always appreciate it. Thank you so much.

[Michael Green]

My pleasure.

[Ed Elson]

After the break, why the US is stepping in to support Japan. And by the way, if you're listening to this episode Tuesday morning, then sign up for our substack livestream today at 11am Eastern. Eastern with Aswath to Modern. Head to profgmedia.com to become a Prof. G+subscriber now.

[Monday.com/Thumbtack Advertiser]

Support for the show comes from SoFi. Education can be one of the most valuable investments you can make in yourself, but figuring out how to pay for it is a huge financial decision. The good news is you have options at every stage of that journey. That's where SoFi comes in. Whether you're getting ready to head off to school already enrolled, or looking for a better way to manage the student loans you already have, SOFI offers lending solutions that are designed to help you move forward with confidence. If you're paying for school, SOFI private student loans can help cover up to 100% of your school certified costs, including tuition, books, housing and more. You can check your rate online in minutes and there's no fees required, including origination or late fees. And if you already have student loans, refinancing with SOFI could save you, raise thousands in interest, reduce your monthly payment, and help you pay down your loan sooner. You can also consolidate multiple loans into one simple monthly payment, and checking your rate just takes a few minutes online. Head to sofi.com profgstudent to explore your options and get started today. SOFI student loans are originated by SoFi Bank NA Member FDIC. Additional terms and conditions apply. NML S69 6891 please borrow responsibly. Support for the show comes from bcx, the public ticker for private tech. For generations, American companies have moved the world forward through their ingenuity and determination. And for generations, everyday Americans could be a part of that journey through perhaps the greatest innovation of all, the US Stock market. It didn't matter whether you were a factory worker in Detroit or a farmer in Omaha, anyone could own a piece of the great American company. But now that's changed. Today, our most innovative companies are staying private rather than going public. The result is that everyday Americans are excluded from investing and getting left further behind, while a select few reap all the benefits. Until now. Introducing vcx, the public ticker for private tech now available wherever you buy stocks. VCX by Funrise gives everyone the opportunity to invest in the next generation of innovation, including the companies leading the AI revolution, SpaceX, exploration, defense tech and more. Visit getvcx.com for more info. That's getvcx.com carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risk, charges and expenses. This and other information can be found in the Fund's [e-mail] this is a paid sponsorship.

[Odoo Advertiser]

Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, Inventory, E Commerce and more. And the best part, Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you try Odoo for [e-mail] that's o d o o dot com.

[Ed Elson]

We're back with Prof. G Markets. Japan's currency is collapsing. And last week the United States stepped in to help. On Thursday, the Japanese yen fell to nearly 164 per dollar, its weakest level in 40 years. And that night, Tokyo intervened, selling as much as US$59 billion to buy back its own curr. Friday, the US treasury did something it hasn't done since 2011. It joined the intervention. Japan confirmed the operation yesterday morning. Trump framed it partly as a favor, calling it a, quote, signal of friendship. Here is what he said. We're very strong, very, very strong financially.

[Katie Martin]

They are, you know, they have a

[Michael Green]

weakening yen and they wanted a little bit of help.

[Ed Elson]

And we're always there for Japan. Japan's been very good to us, with the exception, of course, of Pearl Harbor. Joining us to discuss America's intervention in Japan, we're speaking with Katie Martin, markets columnist and editorial board member at the Financial Times. Katie, thank you for joining us on the show. I just got to start with your reactions to Trump's explanation as to why we have intervened here. Why have we done this?

[Katie Martin]

The line about Pearl harbor is one of the unintentionally most hilarious things I've heard in global macro for quite some time. But there's various different ways of looking at this situation. There is definitely an interpretation here that it's just nice to be nice. Right. And Japan has got a problem with a sliding currency and it's been trying to tackle it and it hasn't really been working. The currency's just sort of been gradually dripping lower this whole time. Nothing's really been working. Admittedly, Japan hasn't really tried really jacking up interest rates, but it wanted some help and the US Came to help. And I think this is one quite important thing to bear in mind here, is that one of the things that this joint intervention does, and as you mentioned, this is the first time the US has been involved at all in this kind of way since 2011, but that was a G7 intervention. Actually, as a bilateral thing, you have to go back even further. You have to go back best part of 30 years to find anything similar to this. Anyway, what it does is it's a signal to the world of we help out our friends. So if you recall back end of last year, Javier Milei, the President of Argentina, he wanted some help with his currency in the run up to an election. And Scott Besant came to help some countries in the Gulf, in the Middle east, they needed some help around the time of the start of the war in Iran. And there was talk of opening up swap lines for countries that are friendly to US interests that might need them. So the US does make a show of being good friends to its friends. But I think there is more than a little self interest going on here. You'll be shocked to hear Japan has two main ways of supporting its currency. It can raise interest rates really quickly, which is quite difficult to do for domestic reasons, or it can sell loads of dollars, and I mean loads of dollars. And when it sells dollars, that means that it sells US Treasuries. Now I'm sure listeners to your podcast are well aware that the U.S. treasury market is in a bit of a fix at the moment. Prices have been falling quite hard, yields have been pushing up, and borrowing costs have got really quite elevated, especially for long term debt. And so the last thing the US wants is for Japan to dump a load of new Treasuries onto the market. So I think that's why they're getting involved here. It's kind of a case of standing behind Japan being that kind of big brother and saying to the market, back off, stop selling this currency.

[Ed Elson]

From my understanding, Japan has been selling Treasuries all year. They've done it multiple times before this summer. And if the yen continues to weaken, I mean, it seems as if Japan will just have to keep selling more of its Treasuries or I guess the US will have to continue to intervene and continue to send money over to them. I mean, why wouldn't this keep happening? Why wouldn't this repeat over and over again?

[Katie Martin]

Well, that's the thing. I've been talking to a bunch of people in the markets about what's happened over the course of today, and most of them are saying this stops the rot if there are speculative accounts out there that are trying to really harm the yen. And it's not clear to me that they are. It's not clear to me there's a massive market dislocation going on here. But in any case, this does help to slow that down. But really what would help Japan and what would help the currency to perk up at this, this point would be, first of all, some big rises in US in Japanese interest rates. As I mentioned, the problem there is again, Japanese Government bond yields, they're pretty low by global standards, but they're very high by Japanese standards. And if they get much higher because Japan raises interest rates, then all of a sudden there's a lot of Japanese investors for whom actually putting money to work in the US Putting money to work in US Treasuries kind of isn't worth it anymore. You may as well just keep that money at home. So again, a solution to the yen problem would potentially SAP quite a lot of demand for US Treasuries out of the system. And again, that's not really in the US interest. So what would really help the yen would be big rises in Japanese interest rates and or big declines in US government bond yields, because those markets tend to be closely correlated. Now, the reason that US government bond markets are in trouble and the US borrowing costs are higher is nothing to do with Japan is because the markets are looking at, they're listening to what they hear from Kevin Walsh, new chair of the Fed, and saying, I don't get it. I don't understand how the Fed is relating to markets at the moment. I don't understand why they're not raising interest rates given their stated objectives. In addition to which, the Fed under Kevin Walsh is talking about talking a lot less to markets and that introduces volatility. So ironically, if there was a shift in regime on the US side, that would actually do a lot more good for the currency on the Japanese side. So look, will this go on all summer? Will we end up with the US constantly coming into the dollar yen market, or weirdly the euro yen market? But will it have to keep on buying yen to try and support the currency? Or is just the fact that they're there standing shoulder to shoulder with Japan, is that enough to put the market off? And there's a good chance that it is.

[Ed Elson]

One of the strange things about this, Katie, is that actually the US is selling euros in this transaction, this intervention. Why is that happening?

[Katie Martin]

This is a total curveball. I have never heard of any country intervening in anyone else's market using a third party currency before. This is a new one on me, new one to everyone I've spoken to about it. But basically it's a function of the fact that the pot of money that the US has stored away for these sorts of instances is predominantly in euros and yen. So this is what they've got available to sell for these sorts of purposes. I gather from reporting that some of my colleagues have done at the FT that the US authorities have been in touch with the European Central Bank. They have been in contact about this. This didn't come as a total surprise, I don't think, to the European Central Bank. But again, if this carries on and if the US Ends up in a situation where it's selling shed loads of euros against the yen and you start to get exchange rate distortions in the euro as a result of what the US Is doing to help out Japan, we are not in Kansas anymore. I don't know how that happens.

[Ed Elson]

Trump said something interesting in that clip. Of course, the Pearl harbor part was the most interesting and hilarious. But at the beginning of it, he said that we are very financially strong, basically saying we have the money to help them, we like them, so we're gonna help them. My understanding is that we have trillions of dollars of debt and actually we're not very financially strong. What is your view on whether this is appropriate and to what extent? We actually are in a position to be sending money over to nations when they're in a rut with their currency.

[Katie Martin]

I mean, the US has tremendous financial firepower for all of the problems around debt sustainability, around little cracks that you can see in the stock market. The reality is it operates the world's dominant reserve currency. It has very reliable demand for that debt. It definitely has the ability to do this. I guess one of the interesting questions that comes out of it, though, is who does Trump help in this way? Who does Besant help in this way? So, for example, say there was a problem in UK government bond market. Would the politics dictate that Trump and Besant would come to the aid of the UK Politically? Probably not. If you are a trader or an investor, particularly if you're of a hedge fund kind of variety, do you start taking out bets against countries that you think are politically aligned with the US or is there risk there that you could get caught on the wrong side of an intervention from Scott Bessant. So this is a whole new way of thinking about global macro, potentially. Which currencies, which bond markets. Is it possible to bet against when you have got this big beast which is the US Standing behind them?

[Ed Elson]

Yes, I was going to bring up, you know, we had the similar situation with Argentina and Javier Milei, and this was right before his midterm election. Besson and Trump come in and they essentially bail out the Argentine peso. And then in the case of Japan, I don't know much about the new Prime Minister Takechi, but I do know that she has praised Trump pretty much extensively. She has said that only you, Donald. I'm Quoting her can achieve world peace. She pushed for him to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. She said that this guy's great. Which for me raises the question, is it unreasonable to assume that we are bailing Japan out at least partly because the leader is saying nice things about our president.

[Katie Martin]

Is bailing out the right kind of framing for this? I'm not sure. But there are very clearly financial benefits to making nice with the US but also the US is clearly very sensitive to any possibility that any major buyers of U.S. treasuries. It's worth bearing in mind that Japan officially holds in excess of a trillion dollars worth of U.S. treasury securities. It's the biggest buyer of Treasuries on planet. But the US is very sensitive to the possibility that anyone could not even dump their Treasuries, but just feel a need not to buy quite so many Treasuries in future. So, you know, the US had quite a kind of allergic reaction at the start of this year when Denmark was saying, well, maybe we're not going to buy so many U.S. assets, what with how you're threatening to invade Greenland. This went down extremely badly. They're very sensitive to this. The US has an enormous deficit. It is extremely reliant on these debt markets. It is not for all of the bravado, I think Scott Besant's an intelligent man and he knows that the US is not in a position to live without these foreign buyers of US Securities. This is what keeps the show on the road in the States. So is Takeichi playing a good game here? Quite possibly is. It is precisely the reluctance of Japanese authorities to tighten monetary policy and raise interest rates. And there is more kind of, there's more spending that comes as a result of this new Takechi government. They're the core problems behind what's going on with the Japanese yen. But also domestically for Japan, inflation is a political issue. And inflation does come when you've got a weaker currency. So that's the kind of. Of symbiosis, is that the US needs Japan to keep buying the Treasuries. Japan needs the yen to be somewhat stronger than it currently is. And Japan also needs that security umbrella that comes from the States. So this is very much the framework that all different countries are operating under at the moment that no one is. It's very difficult geopolitically to distance yourself from the States when you have got all of these interrelationships between markets and geopolitics and security and defense and trade and all of those things all layered on Top of each other. Arguably, Takichi is playing quite a good game here if she can stop the rot in the currency because she's got the US Standing behind her.

[Michael Green]

All right.

[Ed Elson]

Katie Martin is markets columnist and editorial board member at the Financial Times. Katie, foreign exchange is probably the most difficult and confusing topic in all of financial markets. So we appreciate you simplifying it down for us and making it understandable. Thank you so much.

[Katie Martin]

Pleasure.

[Ed Elson]

It's official. Trump is now selling early access to his social media posts to Wall Street. The decision, which was rumored to be happening a few weeks ago, is now final. Trump Media has launched Truth API, a new high speed data fee that gives financial firms a quote, direct licensed real time feed of the platform's most market moving truth. In other words, pay Trump money and you will get early access to his social media. Now, how much money must you pay? Well, reportedly you have to pay a hundred thousand dollars per month. The next question is, is that worth it? Well, if you're a high frequency trading firm, the answer is yes. Trump's tweets move billions of dollars within seconds. Those are billions of dollars that Wall street must pursue. So if you're a real trading firm, well, then you don't have much of a choice. You have to buy this product. And as a result, Trump will make millions off of this. It's kind of like his Trump coin cryptocurrency grift, only this one is a lot bigger and a lot, lot worse. If you are as tired of hearing about Trump's corruption as I am, then you probably don't really care much to hear about this story. It's just another chapter in an endless anthology of fraud and shameless profiteering at the White House. But therein lies the problem. Because the reality is this story should be front page news across every single media platform in the nation. It is a federal scandal the likes of which we've never seen. But it isn't front page news because it has become normalized. We are now numb to these kinds of headlines. We treat them as if it's any other story. And maybe it is, in which case, look how far we've fallen. The only thing left between America becoming a literal third world nation isn't regulation that's been gutted, it isn't enforcement, and it certainly isn't Congress. The only thing left is you. Or more specifically, you and your ability to care. Now, they know this, and that's why they'll do everything in their power to convince you that this doesn't matter and that you shouldn't care and that it's just a sideshow. But as someone who is just as tired and bored of this as you are, I'm here to tell you you should do not stop caring. Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Brad Williams. Our research team is Dan Shalon, Kristen o' Donoghue and Mia Silverio. And our social producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Prof. G Markets from Profg Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm editing, Nelson. I'll see you tomorrow.

[Odoo Advertiser]

Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder With a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, E commerce, and more. And the best part, Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you try Odoo for [e-mail] that's o d o o.com.

[Amazon Prime Advertiser]

Excuses are easy. An epic movie night. We don't have enough snacks. Dinner party with the girls. We'd have to decorate. Surprise date night. Nothing to wear but Amazon's Prime Same day delivery lets you say yes before the moment slips away. Try that new popcorn maker. Order those cheeky drink glasses. Get that new perfume and turn that I wish we could into an I'm so glad we did. Visit Amazon.comprime to find millions of items delivered fast. Same day delivery. It's on Prime. Available in select areas. Terms apply. Support for the show comes from ingen. Running a small business means every dollar has to work hard. But if your team is still booking travel the old way, it's costing you more than you think. Ingen is the fastest growing travel and spend platform in the country, built specifically for businesses like yours. Book a trip in as little as 2 1/2 minutes. Earn up to 10% back on hotels. And in 2025, Enjin customers saved more than $300 million on travel. With zero booking fees, no contracts and no bs. More than a thousand businesses join Enjin every month. Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts [e-mail] Vox.