Stocks Fall to Start September, Kraft Heinz Breaks Up & Why Constellation Brands Has a Beer Problem

Summary

Prof G Markets — Stocks Fall to Start September, Kraft Heinz Breaks Up & Why Constellation Brands Has a Beer Problem

Date: September 3, 2025
Hosts: Ed Elson, Scott Galloway
Guest: Robert Moscow (TD Cowen Managing Director)

---

Episode Overview

This episode of Prof G Markets navigates the shaky start to September for US markets, a major corporate breakup at Kraft Heinz, and the deep secular issues facing Constellation Brands—distributors of major beer labels. As always, Scott Galloway and Ed Elson blend sharp analysis with candid, sometimes acerbic, commentary. The episode digs into underlying global economic shifts, legacy brand challenges, consumer behavior in the age of loneliness, and what it all means for investors.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Markets Slide & Geopolitical Anxiety

Segment: 01:23–04:36

• Market Recap: Major US indices fell after Labor Day, with the Nasdaq declining for the first back-to-back 1% since Deliberation Day. Bond yields jumped; gold hit new records.
• Key Movers: Google stock soared 8% in after-hours trading after an antitrust update—US Judge Mehta ruled Google can keep Chrome but must share its search data and is barred from exclusive contracts.
• Macro Uncertainty:
  • A US federal appeal found many Trump-era tariffs illegal, raising concerns about the US needing to refund billions and further harming business confidence.
  • Uncertainty over Trump’s bid to oust Fed Governor Lisa Cook.
  • Economic anxiety about worsening US-India relations following new tariffs, with Indian PM Modi recently strengthening ties with China and Russia.

Notable Quotes:

• Scott Galloway (on US-India relations):

  “What you brought up last is, in my opinion, the most important thing that happened or that happened in August. ... When India, China, and Russia hook up ... you’re talking about $20 trillion in GDP … this is scary. That is a true ... axis of counterbalance to what has been a 50-year hegemony for the US.” (06:23)

• Scott Galloway (on the US' handling of alliances):

  “It was totally unnecessary. Yet again, another own goal.” (08:25)

---

2. Kraft Heinz Breakup: Bundling to Unbundling

Segment: 13:28–25:09

• Corporate Move: Kraft Heinz will split into two companies by 2026—one for higher-growth products (Heinz, Philadelphia Cream Cheese, Kraft Mac and Cheese), one for mature/slower-growth staples (Oscar Mayer, Velveeta, Lunchables).
  • The stock dropped 7% on the news.
• Strategic Rationale: “Conglomerate tax”—the more diversified a company, the lower the stock’s premium/multiple because investors prefer to choose their own diversification.
• Backstory: The 2015 Kraft-Heinz mega-merger ($46 billion, led by Warren Buffett) emphasized cost-cutting and scale, but failed to react to changing consumer tastes. The stock peaked in 2017, then tumbled as processed foods fell out of favor and brands stagnated—culminating in a $15 billion write-down in 2019.
• Buffett’s Criticism: Buffett has publicly called the split “disappointing” and may exit his 27.5% stake, creating significant market overhang.
• Long-Term Fix?: The split may not solve deeper structural and consumer preference issues; it may pave the way for future acquisitions rather than operational turnaround.

Notable Quotes:

• Ed Elson:

  “It’s not your job to diversify. It’s my job to diversify. It’s the job of the investor, not the board.” (14:29)

• Robert Moscow:

  “What they’re seeing ... is that companies that try to gain scale through breadth are not succeeding as well as those that have focused on depth.” (16:34) “It is very difficult to see a clear path to operational improvement from just splitting up the business. ... Many of these problems are structural in nature.” (20:24)

• Ed Elson (quoting Buffett):

  “It certainly didn’t turn out to be a brilliant idea to put them together, but I don’t think taking them apart is going to fix it.” (25:00)

• Ed Elson (on corporate strategy):

  “You merge, you unmerge, you bundle, you unbundle. But does any of this actually solve the problem? ... Somewhere you have to think the customer kind of gets forgotten.” (25:09)

---

3. Constellation Brands: The Beer Problem Nobody Wants to Discuss

Segment: 25:10–end

• Current State: Constellation Brands (Modelo, Corona, Pacifico) cut its sales outlook, now predicting a decline of 4–6% in net sales for fiscal 2026. Stock is down 32% YTD.
• Management’s Explanation:
  • General macroeconomic pressure and consumer belt-tightening.
  • Weaker demand among the Hispanic community, attributed in part to fears around immigration and job security.
• The Bigger Trend:
  • Beer and broader alcohol sales are down across all major brands—even as macro explanations fall short.
  • The core issue may be secular: "Americans ages 15 to 24 spend 70% less time at parties than they did 20 years ago. Only 25% of Gen Z is still interested in going out to a club."
  • Reduced socializing and rising loneliness mean young people are simply not drinking (or socializing) like previous generations.

Notable Quotes:

• Ed Elson:

  “Put simply, we are the antisocial generation. We are the lonely generation. … We don’t go out. We don’t party. We don’t really drink. And this isn’t an anecdotal observation. This is proven in the data." (28:21) "Lonely people, young people, they’re not buying handles and 12 packs. And if four in five young people are lonely … that’s four in five fewer customers.” (29:35) “Until we put the phones down and get back to partying, I don’t think there’s any real reason to think this is gonna change.” (30:52)

---

Memorable & Candid Exchanges

• Scott’s one-liners on summer and global affairs:
  “My top line thoughts, Ed, are that we should release the Epstein files. … From the markets’ standpoint, we have the wrong metrics. … It’s a metric for the health and well-being of seven companies ..." (04:36)
• On UK/US parallels (Ed & Scott):

  “It's what the Brits did in 2016. That's exactly what the UK did in 2016. They searched that exact entry into Google, not ChatGPT.” (09:44)

• On Kraft Heinz merger cycle:

  “There’s only two ways I know of to make money, bundling and unbundling.” (25:09)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• Market overview, geopolitics, Google antitrust: 01:23–04:36
• Scott Galloway’s macro commentary: 04:01–09:44
• Summer banter (brief): 10:05–10:46
• Kraft Heinz breakup deep dive w/ Robert Moscow: 13:28–25:09
• Constellation Brands’ beer problem and broader trends: 25:10–end

---

Tone & Style

• Candid, snappy, and at times caustically witty.
• Data-rich but also big-picture, weaving in global politics, culture, and evolving consumer behavior.
• No-nonsense: direct discussion of company earnings, management strategy, and macro risks—and skepticism toward PR-friendly explanations.

---

In Summary

This episode unpacks why September started shaky for markets, the strategic (and existential) crisis facing Kraft Heinz, and how macro, demographic, and cultural shifts—particularly loneliness—are reshaping entire categories like alcohol. Scott and Ed connect the dots between big global trends and the granular struggles of legacy brands, always reminding listeners to question surface narratives and look for the real drivers beneath the news cycle.

Transcript

[Robert Moscow]

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte, paint, finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download today. Olivia loves a challenge. It's why she lifts heavy weights and likes complicated recipes. But for booking her trip to Paris, Olivia chose the easy way. With Expedia, she bundled her flight with a hotel to save more. Of course, she still climbed all 674 steps to the top of the Eiffel Tower. You were made to take the easy route.

[Ed Elson]

We were made to easily package your trip.

[Robert Moscow]

Expedia made to travel flight inclusive packages are atoll protected this episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible financial geniuses monetized. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliate potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.

[Ed Elson]

Today's number five that is the percentage of people who will survive a snakebite from the Black Mamba. Put another way, the Black Mamba is less lethal than the Lex Friedman Podcast Money Market Madness if money is evil, then that building is hell. Show goes on.

[Robert Moscow]

Sell Sell.

[Ed Elson]

Welcome to Profit you Markets. I'm Ed elson. It is September 3rd. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices all fell when markets reopened after the holiday weekend. The Nasdaq posted its first back to back 1% Dec liberation day. Meanwhile, bond yields surged with the 30 year nearing 5%. And finally the dollar climbed and gold reached yet another record high. One outlier we will be watching throughout the day is Google. Google stock popped as much as 8% in after hours following a ruling on the antitrust case from a year ago. You'll remember that case found the company maintained an illegal monopoly in search of. Well, now we have a remedy. US District Judge Mehta ruled Google can keep Chrome, but it must share its search data. It's also barred from holding exclusive contracts. We'll have more on this news tomorrow. Okay, what's happening? As I mentioned in the vitals there, it was a rough start to September for Wall Street. The S and P down more than 1% since last Thursday. The Nasdaq down 2%. Bond yields surging gold hitting a record high. A lot of uncertainty. What is spooking investors right now? Well, for starters, as we discussed yesterday, a federal appeals court ruled that many of Trump's tariffs were illegal. That raised fears that the US could be forced to refund billions in tariff revenue. On top of that, investors are bracing for a court ruling on Trump's bid to fire the Fed. Governor Lisa Cook, a hearing took place last Friday, but the judge has not made a decision yet and we will likely not hear one before Thursday. Also, there are concerns right now about America's relationship with India after Trump placed a 50% tariff on the country. And Prime Minister Modi recently took a trip to China and met with Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. So a lot to unpack here. Let's bring in the one and only Scott Galloway to weigh in. Scott, first appearance back on the pod. Good to see you. How are you doing?

[Scott Galloway]

It's good to be seen. I'm here in soho walking around on a beautiful fall day. It's really nice here. I'm glad to be in New York in September here with you at Elson.

[Ed Elson]

You look well rested. So, Scott, so much has happened while you've been away. Trump tried to fire the Fed. Governor Lisa Cook, the appeals court ruled the tariffs are illegal and the US Basically sent India into Russia and China's arms. So much is happening. Let's just get your kind of top line thoughts on what's happened over the past week or so.

[Scott Galloway]

My top line thoughts, Ed, are that we should release the Epstein files. And I just want to remind everybody that some of this is real and some of it is distraction. Yeah, look, from the insignificant him firing or trying to fire Governor Cook, the independence of the Fed is obviously a big deal and something that every modern economy values with the exception of from the markets don't seem to be that rattled by it. One, we have the wrong metrics. It's not a democracy metric. It's a metric for the health and well being of seven companies that quite frankly, in the short run are more focused on whether they can sell AI chips into China than whether or not the Fed maintains independence. What's more interesting is the Supreme Court or the appellate court has turned away or said that some of these tariffs are specifically his. Invoking the Emergency Powers act to enact these tariffs might not have been justified, although people are saying there's workarounds. But again, I think that hits more kind of mid and small businesses than it does these big companies. So again, I don't we have A tendency to look at the market as some sort of litmus test for whether the economy and these decisions are good or bad. And it's a simple, efficient and romantic metric. But they're really misleading because I don't think they really tell the whole story. What you brought up last is, in my opinion, the most important thing that's happened or that happened in August. And the image of 2024 will be Trump's fist pump after the failed assassination attempt. The image of 2025 in terms of importance in my view is the image of Modi, Putin and Xi looking like their three brothers rising up against their dick. Older brother. Yep, that should send a chill down everyone's spine about, I don't know, 2020. Thirty years ago, George W. Bush labeled Iran, Iraq and North Korea the axis of evil. And combined they had about a $1.2 billion or $1.2 trillion GDP. When India, China and Russia hook up to create trade, prosperity and quite frankly a unified front against America, who's trying to bully them around. You're talking about $20 trillion in GDP and more importantly, you're talking about a set of skills and assets that are really formidable, specifically capital and technology out of China, innovation in the largest emerging middle class and consumer population out of India, and energy and a willingness to kill their own and throw them at a war from Russia. This is scary. That is a true, I won't call it an axis of evil, but an axis of counterbalance to what has been a 50 year hegemony for the US which we have enjoyed and gotten really used to. And the last thing I'll say, because I know I'm joining on here, it was totally unnecessary. Yet again, another own goal. We have a fantastic relationship with India and or good relationship with India. And they were increasingly important as the two swing votes in the modern world are the Kingdom and India. And that is they're the most important places that didn't kind of weren't assigned a team yet. And I would argue the kingdom is actually going more capitalist, which I think is a good thing. And India was our saloons because not only are they English speaking or a lot of English speakers, more PhDs anywhere in the world a democracy, but we have this incredible connective tissue of our education institutions and that is the best and brightest minds in India often end up at our finest elite institutions. I know this firsthand. Aswad Damodaram Dasantar Singharajan, our dean at NYU Stern. Wonderful man, Raghu Sundaram. You know, we get the best and Brightest out of India. And it creates empathy, a mutual affection, trade. There's just a general goodwill between the two nations. And what have we done? We've started playing hardball with them to no effect. Announced these 50% tariffs. That is forcing. Turning enemies, natural enemies, into allies such that they can be a more formidable counterweight to your. To your presence. Nixon said the last thing you'd want to do is China to go partner with Russia. So what do we do? We figure out a way to throw India into Russia and China's hands.

[Ed Elson]

Anyway, as we've said before, deals are happening, deals are getting done. It's just they're not really involving us.

[Scott Galloway]

Well, there's an immense amount of global trade taking place. There was a really important summit that happened. Unfortunately, we weren't involved. It's literally as if Trump went to ChatGPT and said, how do I fuck up our prosperity in as elegant a way economically and geopolitically with just head of my ass own goals. Too much, Ed. Too much.

[Ed Elson]

It's what the Brits did in 2016. That's exactly what the UK did in 2016. They searched that exact entry into Google, not ChatGPT. Before you go, Scott, can we just get a quick update on your summer? We haven't heard from you all of August. What happened?

[Scott Galloway]

I don't remember much of it. It was a lot of time with kids and edibles. One of those things was a good time. I had a wonderful August and as did you. I heard you went to Sardinia, you Euro douche. Fabulous person. Trying to impress your girlfriend.

[Ed Elson]

Yes, sir. Yes, sir.

[Scott Galloway]

Sardinia. All you're complaining about is how expensive it is. Welcome to my world. Welcome to my world times four, my man. It's expensive, man. Fabulous. See, the good news is when I was your age, I just went to Irish bars and like to Club Med at Mazatlan for like $800 for a week. Anyway, I had a great summer.

[Ed Elson]

I'm gonna have to switch up my lifestyle. Okay, good stuff. It's good to hear from you. We'll check in with you later this week.

[Scott Galloway]

Thanks, Roland.

[Ed Elson]

After the break, a food giant is breaking up. If you're enjoying the show, give Profg Markets a follow. Support for this show comes from Betterment. When it comes to saving and investing, one size definitely does not fit all. For example, I'm probably going to have very different investment needs and goals than Scott. Betterment is an automated saving and investing platform that tailors itself to to your specific needs. It lets you adjust based on your age, risk tolerance, and any specific life goals that you're working towards. And wherever you are in your investing journey, Betterment strives to save you money with tax smart tools, keeps your investments balanced with globally diversified portfolios, and keeps things simple with automated saving, investing and portfolio rebalancing. If you're listening to property markets, chances are you're the kind of person who enjoys following the markets and getting top shelf financial insights on a day to day basis from the best minds in the business. But whether you're the kind of investor who checks the market every day or just wants to set it and forget it, well, Betterment has options for you. So be invested in yourself, be invested in your future. Be invested with betterment. Go to betterment.com to learn more. Investing involves Risk, Performance not Guaranteed.

[Scott Galloway]

Google's.

[Marques Brownlee]

New Pixel smartphone is here, and like it or not, it's got AI shoved into every nook and cranny. And some of it is actually kind of cool. This week on the Vergecast we spent a week with the Pixel 10 and we have a lot of thoughts about whether its AI is actually useful. Also, the American government now has a 10% stake in Intel. How why will you see dividends on your income tax returns? Plus, weird cameras are having a moment. We go through the last five years of surprising photography trends. That's this week on the vergecast. What is up, people of the Internet? My name is Marques Brownlee, AKA mkbhd, and some of the biggest smartphones of the year are about to launch, including the brand new iPhone 17 is around the corner with a model you've never seen before. So on the Waveform podcast, myself and co hosts Andrew Manganielli and David Amell gather the biggest tech news of each week and then discuss at length everything we're excited about and sometimes things we're not so excited about. So this time of year we like to call smartphone season. So if you're interested in hearing all the latest releases from Apple and Samsung and Google and others, be sure to check out the Waveform podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen. See you there.

[Ed Elson]

We're back with Profge Markets. Kraft Heinz is breaking up. The food giant has announced plans to split into two separate companies by 2026. One business will focus on higher growth products like Heinz Condiments, Philadelphia Cream Cheese and Kraft Mac and Cheese. The other will house slower growth staples like Oscar Mayer, Velveeta and Lunchables, products that are still iconic but no longer drive meaningful growth. The Stock closed down 7% on the news so this is a classic example of what we call the conglomerate tax. We've talked about this on the show before. This idea that the more types of businesses and the more types of assets you house under one corporation, under one stock, the less of a premium you will receive on that stock, the lower a multiple. As Scott has put it, it's not your job to diversify. It's my job to diversify. It's the job of the investor, not the board. And so what we often see is that the stocks that cover too much ground, the stocks that are too diversified, they often don't get these great multiples. And so that is probably the view of the board here. If we split Kraft Heinz into two pure play businesses, one for high growth, the other for low growth, then we'll get a lot more traction on that high growth business and perhaps a better premium. For context, this company has been trading at 1 1/2 times sales. About 10 years ago, they were trading at 4 times sales. Having said all of that, this is a very striking move for this company because it essentially reverses their original strategy, and that is, in 2015, Kraft and Heinz were separate companies and they merged together. It was one of the biggest food mergers in history, a $46 billion deal. It was orchestrated by none other than Warren Buffett, and that created Kraft Heinz. The thesis was to cut costs, boost margins and use scale to grow. And for a while, that worked. The Stock peaked at $93 in 2017. However, it didn't last. Consumers shifted away from processed foods and Kraft Heinz didn't really adapt. Growth stalled, innovation slowed. And in 2019, the company took a $15 billion write down in the value of its two most iconic brands, Kraft and Oscar Mayer. Buffett later admitted that he overpaid for this Kraft deal, and he said it was, quote, wrong in a couple of ways. The stock has since shed more than half of its value, and now they are unmerging. So lots to unpack here to help us understand this breakup and what it means for the company. Let's bring on Robert Moscow, managing director at TD Cohen. Robert Mosco, thank you very much for joining me on Prof. G Markets.

[Robert Moscow]

Thank you for having me.

[Ed Elson]

So Kraft Heinz is unmerging. The Stock has fallen 7% on that news. Maybe just give us a breakdown. Why are they unmerging here and what does this mean for the company?

[Robert Moscow]

Robert, they're unmerging because especially in a very challenged packaged food environment, what they're seeing, and I think a lot of other companies, is that companies that try to gain scale through breadth are not succeeding as well as those that have focused on depth. And depth means a handful of categories where you have really strong market share. Kraft has a lot of brands that have a lot of market share, but so many categories, it must be 30 or 40 different categories across the grocery store. And this ends up making you vulnerable to many different issues at once. Commoditization, private label, premiumization. So their idea is let's go back a lot closer to what Kraft and Heinz look like pre merger and see if focusing have one business that's more on shelf stable condiments and flavors, which is a little bit faster growing. And then that'll be the growth business. The North America grocery business will be slower growth, but focus more on capital efficiency and cash flow. This isn't the first demerger I've seen and I agree with it strategically, but the devil's in the details.

[Ed Elson]

Yeah, I guess part of the idea here being that growth business that will be seen as more of a growth stock, perhaps it'll receive a better premium, higher multiple than it's receiving right now. But the Stock did fall 7%. I'm wondering what you think that says. Were you surprised at all by the market's reaction? What do you think the market is telling us?

[Robert Moscow]

Well, there's a tactical reason for this. I think it has to do with Berkshire's interview or quote, that CNBC reported that Berkshire is not happy with the decision to split up the company. They do not think it creates value. And they've communicated to the company as such, written in the past, is that we're pretty certain that Berkshire will exit its stake. So if they don't agree with the strategic merit of this split, you might take the view that they'll be exiting sooner than later.

[Ed Elson]

I was going to ask you how much because I saw those Buffet comments too. He called this decision disappointing in his message. Cnbc. And one of my questions was how much weight does Buffett's words carry? It sounds like a lot. I mean, moving the stock by 7%. I'm sure that's largely because of their huge position in the company. But that's quite striking though, that Buffett's comments alone could be moving the stock this much.

[Robert Moscow]

Well, I don't think he's telling us something that the street doesn't already know. The street has been knowledgeable about the likelihood of this split happening for a while. What the market is reacting to is the possibility that he's going to sell quickly. And he owns 27.5% of the stock, that would create an enormous overhang. And you can't just put all those shares into the market. It would have to clear at a lower price than the current stock. Now, he also said he didn't want to do that to shareholders, but I'm not sure how both of those things can happen at the same. If he's going to get out of this, it's going to create short term disruption at a minimum.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah.

[Ed Elson]

Just in terms of the breakup itself, who stands to gain the most from this breakup? Do you think that we'll see an improvement in terms of the brand side, in terms of the consumer side? Do you think that the shareholders will ultimately be rewarded over the long term? I'm sure the bankers putting this together are probably making some money off of this. But who are the winners here?

[Robert Moscow]

Well, I work for a bank, so I'm not going to comment on that part. But I will say that it is very difficult to see a clear path to operational improvement from just splitting up the business. It's not a cure all for the litany of problems facing the craft brands. Many of these problems are structural in nature. They probably lost the most share in their categories among the big CPG companies that I follow. And a lot of times their categories are slowing as well. So I think that the way that investors could still win is if the more attractive business, which is global taste elevation, which is condiments and flavorings, that possibly could come into play, a strategic acquirer could emerge. What I've written is that McCormick could be one of those suitors. This would be an extraordinarily big deal for them. So it's unclear whether that will actually play out. But I think another important reason for them to do this is that it is no secret that when Kellogg split up their company two years ago, strategic acquirers emerge for both assets.

[Scott Galloway]

Right.

[Robert Moscow]

So that's not to say that that'll happen again, but certainly it must be a potential scenario, at least for one of the businesses.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah.

[Ed Elson]

You mentioned some of those secular trends that have been affecting the business. And the stock is down more than 30% this year. What are those issues that the company is struggling with? I mean, we've seen a movement away from processed food potentially, and perhaps that's been part of the sort of macro trend that we're seeing with the consumer. There's been a lot of talk, of course, about Ozempic and how that may affect a lot of these packaged food brands. What are the big problems for Kraft Heinz right now?

[Robert Moscow]

Well, price sensitivity among Their consumers is high. They cater to a lot of lower income consumers who are unfortunately feeling the biggest brunt of inflationary pressure. It hurts them more than it hurts the rest of the population. And Kraft, along with a lot of other food companies have raised prices 30% plus during the course of the pandemic. And then lower income consumers had their SNAP benefits cut. Other subsidies have been reduced as well, so their purchasing power went down.

[Ed Elson]

But.

[Robert Moscow]

But I think the bigger, more insidious issue is the things that Kraft does really well is taking commodity meat and cheese and turning into something very convenient for the consumer, which is heavily processed, but you charge a premium for that convenience factor. And a lot of these types of foods are just coming under more and more scrutiny from the Make America Healthy Again movement. Just moms who are reading ingredient labels more carefully. Dads too, me. And there's a backlash against these types of foods that Kraft Brands is kind of like right in the bullseye of.

[Ed Elson]

Yeah, I'm glad you say that, because that is something that we've been talking about on the podcast a lot, and we view it the same way, is that there's just a change in consumer hab. I guess my final question would be then, in what sense does breaking the company up address that? Do you think that that is part of the strategy here? Or is this mostly a financial play for the purposes of, as you say, a potential acquisition at some point? Or does this address those issues operationally?

[Robert Moscow]

They can say that it's going to address these issues and they have said that, that, you know, more focus is the answer. But in my view, I think that solves 15 to 20% of the problem at best.

[Ed Elson]

Got it.

[Robert Moscow]

I think that the real intention here is to make one or maybe even both of these assets up for sale for a strategic bidder. And, you know, again, I think it's following a playbook that Kellogg played.

[Ed Elson]

That was Robert Moscow, managing director at TD Cohen. This all goes back to that great Jim Boxtale quote, which we love to repeat on this podcast. The former CEO of Netscape, he said, quote, there's only two ways I know of to make money, bundling and unbundling. And that's exactly what we're seeing here. We had the bundling back in 2015. We bundled Kraft and Heinz together, and 10 years later, we are now entering the unbundling phase. We are going to unbundle the two companies. But this does raise this bigger question, which is what does any of this actually solve? And Robert kind of hinted that there in this interview. I mean, you merge two, find synergies, and then you unmerge to find focus. You merge, you unmerge, you bundle, you unbundle. But does any of this actually solve the problem? Does any of this sell more lunchables? Does it sell more Mac and cheese? I don't know. But I would imagine that somewhere in between all of these financial engineering strategies, somewhere you have to think the customer kind of gets forgotten. I think Warren Buffett put it best. Yesterday he was asked what he thinks about the unmerger and he said, quote, it certainly didn't turn out to be a brilliant idea to put them together, but I don't think taking them apart is going to fix it. The stock is down 7%. We'll see how it trades throughout the week. But I think that we can say that right now the market agrees with it. Constellation Brands fell more than 6% after the company slashed its full year outlook. The company, which distributes beer brands like Modelo and Corona and Pacifico in the US they now expect to see a decline of 4 to 6% in net sales this year. They had previously expected that sales would remain roughly flat. In a statement, the CEO said, quote, we continue to navigate a challenging macroeconomic environment that has dampened consumer demand and led to more volatile consumer purchasing behavior since our first quarter of fiscal 2026. So Constellation Brands, the distributor of all your favorite beer brands, they are selling a lot less beer and they expect that to continue into the future. Sales were expected to flatline into fiscal 2026. Now they're expected to drop by up to 6%. So something is going pretty wrong at the company and at a very bad time, the Stock is down 32% year to date. So what is going wrong? Well, according to the company, it's a couple of things. First, the macro environment, the fact that prices are rising, inflation is ticking back up, and so the consumer is a little bit stretched right now. And I think that is certainly true and certainly contributing to this. The second issue they cited is a drop off in demand among the Hispanic community, which, by the way, makes up half of US Beer sales for the company. Why is this drop off in demand happening? According to Constellation, a lot of this is due to concerns about immigration and the potential job losses that that might create, and therefore the Hispanic consumer is pulling back. And again, I think that is probably true. I'm sure it is probably contributing in part to the losses here. But there are other forces at play here, forces that are distinctly less cyclical than the ones I've just described. Forces that are not being mentioned by the company, but that are certainly affecting the business and not just of Constellation, but every other alcohol company right now. I mean, you look at all of the big alcohol stocks. Diageo down 13% this year. Molson Coors also down 13%. Boston Beer down 28%. United Spirits down 30%. The alcohol industry as a whole is suffering. And it could be that it is simply these cyclical macro headwinds. Tariff policy, immigration policy, et cetera. Or it could be a victim of something more secular, something more structural, something that will last a long time. And I really think if you want to understand those trends, then the best place to look is young people, because those are the consumers of tomorrow. And when you look at young people right now, what you will find is that there is a social transformation occurring that is fundamentally changing the way we interact with each other and also the way we drink. Put simply, we are the antisocial generation. We are the lonely generation. We've discussed this before. We don't go out. We don't party. We don't really drink. And this isn't an anecdotal observation. This is proven in the Data. Americans ages 15 to 24 spend 70% less time at parties than they did 20 years ago. Only 25% of Gen Z is still interested in going out to a club. Essentially, any activity that requires young people to leave the house is becoming less popular. We eat out at restaurants less than previous generations. We go to sporting events less than previous generations. We even have sex less than previous generations. Just 30% of teens today are having sex compared to more than half three decades ago. So you know, what you're dealing with here is a completely different type of person. A person that doesn't want to go dancing and taking shots with their buddies on a Saturday night. This is a person that wants to watch a live stream at home in their bedroom. And if they are touching substances, I mean, let's be real, they're probably not touching alcohol. They're probably touching a vape. And that might sound cartoonish, but again, this is all borne out by the data. This is what young people are doing. We are more antisocial than ever before. And so is it any surprise, really, that we're not drinking now? If you're a regular listener, you know where we stand on this. We believe loneliness is the most important trend in America right now. We believe it explains pretty much everything. We talked about it as it relates to OnlyFans last week. We've talked about it as it relates to social media. We talked about it as it relates to politics. But we should be clear this also has a big part to play in the story of the consumer, too, and yes, the story of alcohol. Because this doesn't just affect the way we spend our time, it also affects the way we spend our money. Lonely people, young people, they're not buying handles and 12 packs. And if four and five young people are lonely, and that is what the data is telling us, then realistically, that's four and five fewer customers. So maybe this is cyclical. Maybe. Maybe this is to do with the policies that we're seeing, and maybe those policies could change. But it's also very possible that this is secular. It's also very possible that young people, the target consumer of alcohol, it's also possible that they're just not driving the growth anymore. And for now, yeah, the data is clear. The consumers of tomorrow are not drinking. And until we put the phones down and get back to partying, I don't think there's any real reason to think that this is gonna change. Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller, edited by Joel Patterson and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Our research team is Dan Shalon, Isabella Kinsel, Kristen o' Donoghue and Mia Silverio. And our technical director is Drew Burroughs. Thanks for listening to Prof. G Markets. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Elson. I'll see you tomorrow.