Your Bills Are About to Go Up — The Fed Can’t Stop It

Summary

Prof G Markets – Episode Summary
Your Bills Are About to Go Up — The Fed Can’t Stop It
March 19, 2026
Hosts: Ed Elson
Panelists: Michael Gapen (Chief US Economist, Morgan Stanley), Robert Armstrong (Financial Times, Unhedged newsletter)

---

Episode Overview

This episode of Prof G Markets tackles the current inflation spike, dissecting how the Federal Reserve’s recent decisions—and, crucially, the ongoing US-Iran conflict—are set to raise costs for consumers and keep the markets on edge. Host Ed Elson is joined by Michael Gapen and Robert Armstrong, who offer data-driven, candid, and sometimes sobering insights into why inflation is stubborn, the limits of monetary policy, and what might happen next.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Federal Reserve’s Dilemma and the “Uncertainty Era”

Fed Decision Recap

• The Fed held rates steady—no surprises here, with most expecting this outcome (05:10).
• Chair Powell repeatedly emphasized uncertainty, especially regarding the economic fallout from the Iran conflict and volatile oil markets.

Key Insight

"Writing down a forecast at this point in time, very difficult. Powell said, take our forecasts with a grain of salt… Probably not submitting a forecast would have been easier than submitting one."
— Michael Gapen (05:10)

• The Fed’s “balanced” approach now acknowledges:
  • Rising headline inflation (energy, food, gas)
  • Tension between combating inflation vs. preserving labor markets
  • A need for more data before acting decisively (06:38)

---

2. Rate Cuts on Hold: A Wait-and-See Approach

The ‘Dot Plot’ and Policy Signals

• No expectations of further rate hikes, but deeper rate cuts now look less likely in 2026 (06:50).
• Wide uncertainty among officials—compression in outlook due to geopolitical shock.

"We're stuck between the two ends of our mandate. And what are we going to do? We're going to sit and wait until something happens. And I don't know what else in their position, I don't know that there's anything smarter to do than that."
— Robert Armstrong (07:45)

---

3. War in Iran: Oil, Gas, and Everyday Prices

Immediate Impact

• Oil up 40% since the US struck Iran (02:27, 09:05)

• Gasoline already up 30%+ (09:05)

• Fertilizer and agricultural inputs climbing; food costs to follow

• Real-time Consumer Effect:
  Oil price shocks flow through to gasoline prices within two weeks.

  • “40% of the cost of food… is related to transportation costs.”
    — Michael Gapen (15:21)
  • Concerns over “second round effects” of inflation—potential for sustained price rises if oil shock persists or worsens.

• Policymaker’s bind:
  Rate hikes could curb demand, but would risk damaging the economy more than restraining oil-driven inflation (11:13).

---

4. The Structural Stubbornness of Inflation

• Even before the war, “sticky” inflation (core at ~3%) wasn’t declining as hoped (13:00).
• Tariffs and supply chain issues remain background concerns.
• Services (ex-housing) inflation is “sticky” and frustrating policymakers (12:17).

“Inflation's kind of at three… and it's going sideways.”
— Robert Armstrong (13:00)

• The impact for households is acute: those relying heavily on labor market income and goods (especially gas) are getting squeezed.

---

5. How Should Investors and Analysts React?

• Virtually all inflation forecasts hinge on how long the military situation in Iran drags on (10:38, 17:36).
• Geopolitical risk means economists must model multiple scenarios—prices could swing dramatically depending on developments:

“Let me give you an example—right now options on oil are what we call bimodal. There’s a mass of expectations saying oil's probably coming back down to around $70 a barrel, and then there’s a second mass at around 150.”
— Michael Gapen (18:32)

• Probability-based scenario planning is key; anyone promising certainty is overreaching.

---

6. Comparing Today’s Inflation to Past Crises

• The present is fundamentally different from the 2020-22 pandemic era or the 1970s oil shocks (23:44, 24:56).
  • Pandemic: global, goods-centric, fiscal stimulus—direct government cash injections.
  • 1970s: oil price increase was “400%”—today’s shock is smaller in scale.

“If someone were to say, oh, Michael, but what about the 70s? That was more like a 400% increase in oil. Right? So that's kind of like oil going from 60 to 250.”
— Michael Gapen (25:52)

• Current shock: hurtful, but more manageable if the war resolves quickly; not yet a true “stagflation” event.

---

7. Stagflation: A Real Risk or Hype?

• The “stagflation” buzzword is back, but panelists push back on apocalyptic comparisons (27:40).
  • Classic stagflation: high inflation and high unemployment and negative GDP growth.
  • Current: Could tip into “mini stagflation” if oil spikes persist, but the economy still has strengths—particularly from AI-driven investment and productivity.

“You can get a micro stagflation which is… the Fed being stuck. Inflation is too high for you to really stimulate, but the economy is slowing down, so you want to stimulate, and what can you do?”
— Robert Armstrong (28:16)

---

8. How “Good” Is the Economy, Really?

Final Ratings (32:02–34:03)

• Robert Armstrong:
  “On the big stats—unemployment, consumption, output, growth—this is a pretty good economy… If this is a bad economy, may all the world have bad economies.”

• Michael Gapen:
  “I'd give it a B plus right now… But… two out of three, if not 70–75%, of households consume primarily out of labor market income, and gas tends to be a larger share of their consumption bundle. So parts of the US household are stretched.”

• Key Point:
  Macro data looks strong, but the average household feels squeezed, especially at the gas pump and grocery checkout.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “This is another supply shock that puts upward pressure on both inflation and the unemployment rate. So that leaves our goals in tension.”
  — Michael Gapen (05:35)

• “Rate increases are a terrible tool for dealing with high energy prices… You’re going to have to do so much damage to demand with higher rates that you’re going to wish you didn’t do it in the first place.”
  — Robert Armstrong (11:13)

• “The answer tends to be you need to write multiple scenarios of how the world could evolve and then place kind of subjective probabilities on those.”
  — Michael Gapen (18:32)

• “It all reverse engineers to how long we last in Iran… I mean, that's what we're talking about here, right?”
  — Ed Elson (10:38)

---

Important Timestamps

• 05:10 — Michael Gapen on Fed indecision and uncertainty
• 06:50 — Robert Armstrong on policy paralysis and the compressed dot plot
• 09:05 — Gapen explains oil/gas prices impact on inflation and households
• 13:00 — Armstrong: “inflation is going sideways”
• 15:21 — Gapen on second-round inflation effects
• 18:32 — Gapen on scenario planning for oil prices
• 24:56 — Gapen: why this isn’t the 1970s (yet)
• 27:40 — Armstrong on including “$200 oil” in market models & stagflation risks
• 32:02 — Panelists rate the current US economy

---

Tone and Language

• Direct, data-driven, frequently laced with dry wit and a realistic—sometimes pessimistic—assessment of policymakers’ limits
• Willing to draw historical analogies but quick to highlight differences
• Emphasis on humility—predicting the future is hard, especially so when it hinges on geopolitics

---

Summary Takeaway

Your bills are going up, and the Fed, for all its power, can't do much about oil-driven inflation. The real drivers are geopolitics—not monetary policy. As the panel makes clear, unless the Iran war resolves quickly, expect more expensive commutes, groceries, and growing unease among American households—however strong the GDP headlines might read.

---

For ongoing coverage of inflation, rates, and market strategy, subscribe to the Prof G Markets podcast or Ed Elson’s newsletter at simplyput.profgemedia.com

Transcript

[Podcast Host]

Support for this show comes from Indeed. If you're looking to hire top tier talent with expertise in your field, Indeed says they can help. Indeed Sponsored Jobs gives your job the best chance at standing out and grants you access to quality candidates who can drive the results you need. Spend more time interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. Now with Indeed Sponsored Jobs and listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves@ Indeed.com VoxBusiness just go to Indeed.com VoxBusiness right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com VoxBusiness Terms and Conditions apply. Hiring do it the Right way with Indeed

[Ed Elson]

Adobe Acrobat. Your team's home base. Collaborate within a shared PDF space. You've got your docs, your plans, your specs, and then invite the crew to build what's next.

[Michael Gapen]

Talk up the teamworks.

[Ed Elson]

They think that this design could be a contender, and when somebody wonders what's the next steps, AI helps you finish the rest. Bolts are tight now your plan's refined. Run a smoother business when you're all aligned.

[Robert Armstrong]

Do that with Acrobat.

[Ed Elson]

Learn [e-mail]

[MITI Health Advertiser]

it's true that some things change as we get older. But if you're a woman over 40 and you're dealing with insomnia, brain fog, moodiness and weight gain, you don't have to accept it as just another part of aging. And with MITI Health, you can get help and stop pushing through it alone. The experts at MITI understand that all these symptoms can be connected to the hormonal changes that happen around menopause, and MITI can help you feel more like yourself again. Many healthcare providers aren't trained to treat or even recognize menopause symptoms. MIDI clinicians are menopause experts. They're dedicated to providing safe, effective, FDA approved solutions for dozens of hormonal symptoms, not just hot flashes. Most importantly, they're covered by insurance. 91% of MITI patients get relief from symptoms within just two months. You deserve to feel great. Book your virtual visit today@join MIDI.com that's join M I D I.com today's number 80 billion.

[Ed Elson]

That's how many dollars Meta spent on its Metaverse platform Horizon Worlds, before the company decided yesterday to shut it down. A spokesperson said they did what was best for the firm and also apologized to their dozens of users.

[SoFi Advertiser]

Money Market matter if money is evil,

[Ed Elson]

then that building is hel.

[Robert Armstrong]

The show goes on Sell. Sell.

[Ed Elson]

Welcome to Property Markets. I'm Ed elson. It is March 19th. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices fell as the Federal Reserve announced its interest rate decision. More on that in a moment. Treasury yields climbed. Meanwhile, Brent crude prices jumped after an airstrike on Iran hit one of the world's biggest gas fields. Okay, what else is happening? The Federal Reserve has decided to hold rates steady. That outcome was widely expected. Kalshi put the odds of a hold at 99%. In its statement, the Fed noted that the economic implications of war with Iran were, quote, uncertain. Meanwhile, recent inflation data has been discouraging. The Producer price index rose 3.4% year over year. That was its biggest annual gain in a year. And core PPI, which excludes food and energy, came in at 3.9%. Personal consumption expenditures told a similar story last week. Core inflation rose 0.4% in January alone and 3.1% year over year. And remember, these reports only offer a rear view mirror. What is ahead is looking even worse, at least for now. Since the US struck Iran on February 28, the price of oil is up 40% and gas prices have risen more than 30% as price increases are also hitting other industries, such as agriculture, where the cost of Fertilizer has risen 25%. So the bottom line is our bills are probably going to go up even more. Here to discuss the inflation outlook for 2026, we're joined by another panel of experts. Today we have Michael Gapen, chief US Economist at Morgan Stanley, and also Robert Armstrong, financial commentator for the Financial Times and author of the Unhedged newsletter. Michael. Robert, thank you both very much for joining us. Michael, I'm going to start with you. We got the Fed decision. Rates remain where they are. Everyone expected that. Was there anything else we found out, anything that is perhaps unusual, interesting, or maybe changes the situation in any way?

[Michael Gapen]

Wouldn't say that there was anything unusual because the standard playbook for the Federal Reserve in a situation of getting an oil price shock is to be predisposed to want to look through any increase in headline inflation. But so I think what I heard a lot of, though, and you noted it, the repetition of uncertainty, uncertainty, uncertainty. Writing down a forecast at this point in time, very difficult. Powell said, take our forecasts with a grain of salt. And he said this is one of those moments where probably not submitting a forecast would have been easier than submitting one. And so I think, yes, the Fed is saying, okay, headline inflation will be rising, but that's only part of the story. This is another supply shock that puts upward pressure on both inflation and the unemployment rate. So that leaves our goals in tension. So to know what to do, we probably need to see some more data. And so I think he gave what a balanced view of the outlook could be higher inflation, could be weaker labor markets, and then interjected a little uncertainty and caution. And I think that's the appropriate response. So I wouldn't say a lot new, but just a re emphasis on uncertainty tells you again, the Fed would like to see progress on inflation, but now there's kind of another hurdle that it has to overcome this year.

[Ed Elson]

What about looking forward in terms of rate cuts? Robert, what did we learn, if anything, about what we're going to see in 2026 from the Fed?

[Robert Armstrong]

I mean, if you look at the notorious dot plot, and I do want to take on board Michael's comment that this is the chair Powell and the Fed was obviously not very pleased at having to have give to to give projections this time around, given that we've rolled the iron dice and there's so much war uncertainty. But if you do look at that dot plot which shows the projections for appropriate rate policy this year, there was kind of a bit of compression. Now nobody is looking for rates to be increased again this year, but the tail of people who think there should be several cuts pushed up as well. So the plot for 2026 kind of compressed and partly that's an expression of uncertainty and partly it's saying we are stuck here with these what Powell describes as modestly restrictive rates and we're stuck between the two ends of our mandate. And what are we going to do? We're going to sit and wait until something happens. And I don't know what else in their position, I don't know that there's anything smarter to do than that.

[Ed Elson]

Well, I think for consumers and for observers, I mean, my intro there basically said it, which is inflation appears to be set to rise and that's what we're all worried about. And so I guess the question was something that I was expecting was for them to say, yeah, this is something we're quite worried about too. And it sounds like what we heard was we don't really want to say anything about it. We're going to acknowledge the elephant in the room, which is that Iran is happening and that that's going to have an effect on on oil prices, it's going to have an effect on gas prices. In fact, we're already seeing it. But even when you look at, you know, what the members of the FOMC predicted, 12 of them said, yeah, we're going to get at least a cut in 2026. Which I guess to me, I'm kind of like, well, aren't prices set to rise quite dramatically? Michael, what do you make of the possibility that we could have quite rampant inflation now that the Iran war is kind of well underway?

[Michael Gapen]

So you're right that there is already clear evidence that prices will go higher. We're seeing it in gasoline prices that are up 50 cents to a dollar per gallon nationwide. And oil is, and its byproducts are inputs into things like fertilizer and diesel fuel and airline prices. So you will see it. And yes, we are already seeing it. The question from the point of view of the policymaker or the Fed is, well, how long will oil stay elevated if there is a, let's call it fairly quick, you can be subjective about your definition of that. If there's some fairly quick resolution to this and oil is back down to its 60 to $70 range where it was going into this, say in May, it's hard to argue that the broad outlook for the United States has changed a lot. But it could be that oil prices stay elevated much longer than that or even move higher from here. And so, yes, you could get a prolonged inflation shock, but the higher oil prices go, it also means demand is weaker and labor markets are likely to be weaker. So I think the Fed did acknowledge today and Powell acknowledged today, and their forecast acknowledge inflation will be higher. But the uncertainty part of this as well, it depends on how long this geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle east lasts. And the Fed's no better at predicting that than I think anybody else. So I think that's the dilemma they're in.

[Ed Elson]

It seems like the future of our economy right now, of inflation right now, is basically entirely dependent on how long do we stay in Iran and how long until this situation is pretty much resolved. And I guess that's on the President. I mean, it's not clear to me how any of us have any sway over how this is resolved, but is, I mean, that's what we're talking about here, right? This all reverse engineers to like how long we lost in Iran.

[Robert Armstrong]

I think the real problem for the policymaker, as Michael suggested, is that rate increases are a terrible tool for dealing with high energy prices.

[Ed Elson]

Right?

[Robert Armstrong]

Like if you're going to control high energy prices, you're going to have to do so much damage to demand with higher rates that you're going to wish you didn't do it in the first place. Right. That's why the Fed policymaker wants to look through this stuff. I would note however, that in this meeting today, the long running inflation dramas did come up. Namely, are we going to see the half a percentage point of inflation that we think is coming from good tariff tariffs on goods? Is that going to go away as we all think? Chair Powell sure hopes so and so did the rest of us. And it was interesting when he was asked, the first question he was asked was do we look through oil price inflation? And his answer was, the first thing I'm looking for is for tariff inflation to go away.

[Ed Elson]

Right.

[Robert Armstrong]

You know what I mean? And once we get that dealt with, I'll be able to worry about oil. Right. And the second long running drama that got mentioned that I thought was interesting is he was talking, the chair was talking goods inflation, goods inflation, tariffs, tariffs. But he was pushed by one of the journalists who said, well, aren't services inflation when you take out housing? Aren't those kind of sticky at 3% now for quite a long time? And he was kind of like, yeah, that's pretty frustrating too. We wish that wasn't true. So like there are. It's not all. It's not all. It's a lot. Oil is, is the headline now and it's a big story.

[Ed Elson]

Yeah.

[Robert Armstrong]

But you know, the way I look at it, inflation's kind of at three.

[Ed Elson]

Right.

[Robert Armstrong]

And it's going sideways.

[Ed Elson]

Yeah.

[Robert Armstrong]

Right. And that was true before we started this May. You know, you could say it's 2.8 or 3.1 or whatever, PPI report, whatever. But it's somewhere in there. It's a point above, it's a point above where it should be and it's going sideways and we don't really know why. I mean, Michael may know why.

[Ed Elson]

Well, Michael, I mean, when we look at the inflation that we already were dealing with, which was maybe moderating but still pretty sticky and certainly Nowhere near the 2% target, add on top of it, what's happening to oil? What are your inflation expectations going forward? And for those who maybe haven't thought about the connection between oil prices and everything else, how could those prices trickle down through the rest of the economy? How could it show up on, on, on the bills of regular households across America?

[Michael Gapen]

Yeah, it was interesting today because obviously this is a meeting where the Fed released its updated projections and, and we looked at them and we said, oh, that's interesting. Their forecasts now look a lot like ours. So I And I think, as Rob mentioned, it will be an outlook then where headline inflation is close to 3% by the end of this year. And the Fed thinks core inflation, so if you exclude food and energy prices could be somewhere around 2.7%. So some diminishment in core goods inflation, but not a whole lot. So the trajectory is there from the Fed's perspective, it's moving in the right direction still in their forecast, but it's a quite gentle downslope. So this is, you know, view that the oil price shock is another hurdle that the Fed will have to overcome in order to ease rates. And on your, the second part of your question. Yes, oil moves directly from, you know, oil prices to gasoline prices in the U.S. it does that very quickly, usually within about two weeks. And so we see that. So what, what they will be worried about is what, what we call second round effects, right? Because oil and energy is an input into the production process more broadly. For example, roughly 40% of the cost of food when you go into the grocery store is related to transportation costs.

[Ed Elson]

Right?

[Michael Gapen]

So you can, you get, you can get second round effects on inflation. Now history says you're not likely to because the higher oil prices go and the more you and I have to spend on gas, the less we have to spend somewhere else. So there's usually some demand destruction that prevents that second round effect, but there's no guarantee. As Powell said, We're about five years of inflation running above 2% and at least short run inflation expectations have moved higher. So there's no guarantee we won't see second round pass through effects. But history says they should be limited. And as Rob said, the answer then is you kind of need more time to see what's happening.

[Robert Armstrong]

I guess the other point I'd make there, Ed, is that there is this kind of question out there is like how many times can you kind of punch the economy in the face before it becomes permanently grouchy about the future? And where you have things like longer term inflation expectations go up because you get these shocks, whether it's Covid and then it's tariffs and then it's this war and it's like you're taking all these hits and at some point you start to think maybe I'm in a kind of nasty inflationary world and my longer term expectations for inflation start to trickle up. I should note that is not happening now. I was looking at 5 year, 5 year forward inflation breakevens this morning, which is a kind of tricky mathematical way of getting an estimate of what inflation is going to be in the five years, starting in five years. So you subtract various bonds from another. They haven't moved at all. No change since the start of the war. So the inflation the market anticipates is all in the short term, and that's a good sign so far. What I think would scare me to death and would certainly scare Chair Powell and the rest of his committee to death is if you see someone anchoring at the longer end of the curve, higher term premium, whatever, that would be bad.

[Ed Elson]

Right.

[Robert Armstrong]

But so far it's been amazingly stable out there. Right. Like, you know, as, as he emphasized today, we're not seeing any sign of that, but that would be the bad thing to look for.

[Ed Elson]

It's so interesting because, I mean, what we're trying to do here is we're trying to predict the future. We're trying to predict the future of prices. And as we said, kind of at the top of the program, like that all relates to what happens in Iran, at least for now. That's what the whole question is all about, which means that these analysts and these investors have to try to put on their sort of military strategist hats and try to predict what on earth is going to happen in the Middle east, which seems to me to be a very difficult thing to do and certainly a very difficult thing for investors to do because we're not military experts. So I guess my question to you, Michael, over at Morgan Stanley, where that is the job as the economist of the firm and as the guy whose job it is to figure out what's going to happen, like how do you think about these issues when they're so specific to geopolitics and to literally military strategy?

[Michael Gapen]

Well, you're putting me on the spot on this one. I would say maybe a trite answer. I mean, you do your best, but you, you recognize that the error bands, as we would say, as an economist lingo, the error bands around your forecast are a lot wider. So let me give you, let me give you an example right now. If you look at options on oil, they're what we call bimodal. There's kind of a mass of expectations saying oil's probably going to come back down to around $70 a barrel. And then there's a second Mass at around 150. And this gets back to, I think, to your earlier point about a lot of the outlook, then depends on how long we sit, where we are. The longer the straight is closed, you might see a shift to 150. If there's a resolution you can go back to 70. So the answer tends to be you need to write multiple scenarios of how the world could evolve and then place kind of subjective probabilities on those. So the usefulness of one modal most likely baseline outlook diminished in this environment. And you have to be a little flexible and say it could be this, it could be that. Let's sketch out how both of those scenarios work. So that's, that's about the best you can. The best you can do, yes, which

[Ed Elson]

is of course unsatisfying for all of us. But that's what we have to deal with.

[Michael Gapen]

It's where we are.

[Robert Armstrong]

This is the life we have chosen. As they said, it's a Godfather.

[Ed Elson]

Stay tuned for more of this panel after the break and for even more markets insights. You can subscribe to my weekly newsletter, Simply put@simply put.profgemedia.com.

[SoFi Advertiser]

Support for the show comes from SoFi. To stay ahead in this economy, your number one priority should be staying on top of your finances. With inflation and market shifts, you can't afford to be passive. Passive. You need to be proactive about where every dollar is going and part of that is having a bank that actually works for you. Enter SoFi. SoFi plus is a premium membership, a smart way to get more for your money. SoFi plus is packed with benefits and unlock a thousand or more in annual value with qualifying activities values including a competitive APY on savings and investment match for your IRA and access to one on one sessions with SoFi Wealth Financial Planners. You can get started for $10 a month and and if you join SoFi plus between now and April 15th, you'll have a chance to win over $75,000 in cash. SoFi is also giving 20 individuals $1,000 in cash prizes and 50 winners free SoFi plus memberships for a year. Head to sofi.com scottg to enter terms and conditions apply. To learn more about SoFi plus, head to sofi.comsofi-.

[Stonyfield Organic Advertiser]

THIS is advertiser Content brought to you by Stonyfield Organic. Our cows, them going out to pasture, they love it. They're so excited to go out every day. They wait right at the door. In fact we milk them and we just open up the laneway and let them just go right out to pasture. I'm Rhonda Miller Goodrich and I'm a dairy farmer in Cabot, Vermont. Our farm is Molly Brook Farm. We're an organic dairy farm and we are a supplier to Stonyfield. Molly Brook Farm has been in My husband's family since 1835. We started our organic transition in 2015. We had 53 acres of corn ground and of course we had to use herbicides and pesticides and the soil was dead really. For all intents purposes, we stopped growing corn and stopped using herbicides and pesticides and we seeded that down to perennial grasses. After that we begin to see biodiversity in that soil again. To be organic certified, our cows need to be in pasture at least 120 days. I think the organic practices really benefit our animals. You know, having good feed, good water, a nice light area. That's what's important, important to us. And that's what's important to Stonyfield. Visit stonyfield.com to find Stonyfield Organic Yogurt near you.

[Podcast Host]

Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder? With a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other. Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, E commerce, and more. And the best part, Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you try Odoo for [e-mail] that's o d o o dot com.

[Ed Elson]

We're back with our panel. When you think back, Michael, to our previous round of runaway inflation. When you think Back to post Covid 2021 going into 2022 and the impact that that inflation had, at least that's what's in my mind right now. I mean, we're looking at a situation where we don't know what the inflation picture is going to be, but it's very uncertain. And it seems that a runaway situation is on the table because of what we're seeing not just in America, but also in Europe, which is getting absolutely hammered, at least prices over there in Asia. It all reminds me of that post Covid era where everyone's inflation was going out of control and then suddenly everyone had to figure out how to deal with it. Most decided, okay, we're just going to raise rates, we're going to tighten as much as we can. And then we did see a very significant drawdown, more than 20% decline in the S and P. And it was largely a function of this inflation problem that was stemming from supply chain issues because of COVID I'm just reminded of what happened there when I look at what's happening right now. Is that the right thing to think about or is this just completely different?

[Michael Gapen]

I'm going to push back on that and say I do think it is different. The COVID story was certainly, obviously, as everyone knows, it was a global pandemic and supply chains globally were constrained. So given the integration of the global economy and the share that goods are in the average person's consumption basket over 10%, up as high as maybe 20% now gasoline for example, is about 2 to 3%. So the magnitudes of the shock here are very different. So I think the ultimate effect on inflation will be different. And just from a historical perspective, if someone were to say, oh, Michael, but What about the 70s? That was more like a 400% increase in oil. Right? So that's kind of like oil going from 60 to 250.

[Robert Armstrong]

Right.

[Michael Gapen]

Okay, then I'm with you. It's much bigger problem. It'll downstream into other things. That's your literal stagflation scenario. But I don't think the oil shock we're seeing now is reminiscent of that. And last point, I'll turn it back to you or Rob for comments. We were at about $120 a barrel in 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. So we've been in this territory for a while and it didn't entirely derail the US economy. So yes, it pushed prices higher. I agree with that. But I think we're better at dealing with this than the global pandemic.

[Ed Elson]

Rob, what do you make of that?

[Robert Armstrong]

I think that's exactly. Michael's got it exactly right as far as I can see. Only things I would add is back post Covid tight job market now we've got kind of a squishy one. And I wish it wasn't squishy, but that'll help on the inflation front. In theory it should. And also back then we had the government putting dollars into people's pockets and now we have the gas pump taking dollars out of people's pockets. Again, that should be a bit deflationary. So, but I think Michael has the picture right. I mean, by the way, $200 oil is not a scenario we should completely dismiss. I think it's over in one of the tails. But the, you know, again we all become emergency experts on things. But you know, in the last week I've become more of an emergency expert on the oil, on the kind of oil inventories. The longer the strain of Hormuz stays closed, it's not like there's a linear increase in the Price of oil, you know, global inventories start to get down, the well starts to dry, and you have a geometric increase in prices. So I'm not saying we're going to get $200 oil. I'm just saying I'm not laughing at the very suggestion.

[Ed Elson]

Right, yeah. $200 a barrel is something that I think needs to be at least in people's models. You need to entertain the possibilities. And then the other word that I hearing is stagflation, which is a word that comes up every now and then, but it's a very scary word, and it's now kind of a little bit more in vogue. Rob, is stagflation. One, what is stagflation? And two, is stagflation something that is genuinely or potentially on the horizon here?

[Robert Armstrong]

Well, Powell was asked about stagflation today, and he said stagflation is something that happens in the 1970s where you have a massive increase in unemployment. You have 10% unemployment and you have inflation at 10% or something. And it's like you're really getting it from both sides. But you can get a micro stagflation, which is, you know, the. The Fed being stuck. Inflation is too high for you to really stimulate, but the economy is slowing down, so you want to stimulate, and what can you do? And you know, to a certain degree, by that more modest or small definition definition of stagflation, it's already happening now. You get the economy is pulling in both directions and, you know, that can get worse. And what's miserable about it is that it's not clear what the policy response is. What do you do about it? You know, so knock on wood, you know, yeah, let's not do an experiment

[Michael Gapen]

in that, you know, let's. Please not.

[Robert Armstrong]

I don't know if Michael is. I'm old enough to just barely remember the 70s stagflation and in particular its effect on the price of candy bars and the general mood around my house. And it was bad. It was really bad.

[Ed Elson]

Yeah. Michael, what do you think about that comparison? I mean, are we close or are we getting close to a stagflationary scenario here?

[Michael Gapen]

Or is that far off, as Rob says, not the literal definition of stagflation, which is falling output or negative GDP growth, rising unemployment and rising inflation. But this is. If you kind of think just about persistent inflation and sluggish growth, then, yes, you could certainly be on the verge of that. What's helping the economy a lot right now, of course, is AI related business spending and some productivity Gains. So I mean, you actually saw the Fed revise higher its growth forecast for 2026 today. I suspect it would have been even higher had oil prices not risen. But I mean, just, it's, I think it's obvious for the listener how this would, how a stag, mini stagflation scenario would play out. If something like you mentioned, 150 or $200 a barrel became a reality, then you're talking $5, $6 gasoline, right? So that will slow things down. I don't have the ability to buy everything I need to buy if I have to pay that much for gasoline. So it dampens growth in real income, it dampens purchasing power. The consumer is 70% of the economy. So if they pull back and save on a precautionary basis, then growth will slow pretty quickly.

[Ed Elson]

I think one thing, just as we start to wrap up here, one thing that a lot of people, a lot of Americans are just trying to figure out is, is the economy doing well? Is it doing poorly? Especially with the midterms coming up. I mean, this is the big question. And now that we have this, maybe oil crisis is unfair a word, but something close to seems though, as though the vibe is that the economy is not doing well, the economy is bad. These are obviously kind of ridiculous reductive terms. But it is important, especially when we get into the world of politics, which we are just brushing up against right now. So as we end here, I would like to just get your guys ratings on the economy on March 18th. I'll start with you, Rob. How would you rate the economy if you had to categorize it as good or bad? As reductively as you can.

[Robert Armstrong]

Okay, Reduction is my business. As we say in journalism, before the shock of this war, GDP growth was probably at or above potential growth for the economy. Consumption was growing in real terms, wages were growing in real terms, unemployment is below 5%. If this is a bad economy, may all the world have bad economies. You know the thing, the only black mark is I wish the job market was a bit dynamic. You know, it was a bit more dynamic than it is now. We have a low unemployment rate, but nobody's hiring anyone, right? And I don't like that. But like on the big stats, unemployment, consumption, output, growth, this is a pretty good economy.

[Ed Elson]

Pretty good.

[Michael Gapen]

Okay, Michael, so I would agree. I'll be reductive in a grading sense. I'd give it a B plus right now. Yes, and a B plus on the macro data because as, as Rob mentioned, GDP looks pretty good. The unemployment rate's low, inflation's running free. That's not a disaster. Could be better. But it, you know, it's, it's not where we were in Covid, for example. Yeah, but the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And the vast majority of households in the U.S. roughly two out of three, if not, you know, 70, 75%, they consume primarily out of labor market income. Goods are a larger share of their consumption bundle. Gas tends to be a larger share of their consumption bundle. So parts of the US Household are stretched. And as Rob mentioned, the labor market is not dynamic. Employment growth is slow. So income and employment prospects are weak for some households. So this is why I think you get a disparity between what the consumer survey says, just mixed, and what the macro data says, which is what are you worried about?

[Ed Elson]

Right. Okay. Michael Gapen, chief US Economist at Morgan Stanley. Robert Armstrong, financial commentator for the Financial Times. Michael, Robert, appreciate you both. Thank you. So much.

[Robert Armstrong]

Fun to be here.

[Michael Gapen]

Thank you.

[Ed Elson]

Okay, that's it for today. We appreciate you joining us for another Prof. G Markets panel. If you have a guest you think we should speak to on this topic or any other, please drop us a line in the comments or email our Producer, [e-mail] We hope to hear from you. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss, edited by Joel Patterson and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Brad Williams. Our research team is Dan Shalon, Isabella Kinsel, Kristen o' Donoghue and Mia Silverio. And our social producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Profg Markets from Profg Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Elson. And tune in tomorrow for a conversation with Ed Yardeni.

[Robert Armstrong]

Your business identity is everything from what customers see to what they don't like. Legal paperwork, website security and state licenses. Well, now you you can get more for your business with Northwest Registered Agent. Northwest Registered Agent has been helping entrepreneurs launch and grow businesses for nearly 30 years. They're the largest registered agent and LLC service in the US with over 1500 corporate guides. Don't wait. Protect your privacy, build your brand and get your complete business identity in just 10 clicks and 10 minutes. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com paidvox and start building something amazing. Get more with Northwest registered [e-mail] paidvox

[Michael Gapen]

Support for this show comes from tastytrade. There's two types of traders out there, the ones who settle for the status quo and the ones who push the envelope. Tastytrade is the platform of choice for the latter. With Tastytrade, you can trade stocks, options, futures and more all in one platform. It offers low commissions so you can keep more of what you earn. Become the trader you always wanted to be. Go to tastytrade.com Vox Today tastytrade Inc. Is a registered broker, dealer and member of FINRA, NFA and SIPC.

[Stonyfield Organic Advertiser]

Support for the show comes from Coreweave. Everywhere you look, AI is expanding what we thought was possible. And at the center of it all is coreweave. Medical research and diagnosis, education, complex visual effects for movies, science and technology breakthroughs. CoreWeave powers AI pioneers around the world with purpose built tech building what's never been built before. CoreWeave CoreWeave is the essential cloud for AI. Ready for Anything, Ready for AI to learn more about how CoreWeave powers the world's best AI, go to CoreWeave.com Ready for Anything.