Loading summary
Narrator
When a cold has you down, it's the little comforts that lift you up. A warm blanket, a cup of tea, and a tissue that actually feels good on your skin. Infused with Aloe Kleenex Cooling plus Aloe provides a hint of cooling freshness to help your skin feel restored. So whether your skin is feeling dry, chafed or irritated, you're only one wipe away from helping it feel relieved. The next time you have a cold, get a hint of instant cooling relief with new Kleenex Cooling plus Aloe for whatever happens next, grab Kleenex Avoiding your.
Historian Stephen Remy
Unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte, paint, finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download Today this is not a World War II story. Not really. But it does start here in Belgium in the Ardennes forest.
Historian or War Correspondent
German tanks and infantry had penetrated from 5 to 20 miles into the American lines. And although there is no information at the moment about our losses, it is reasonable to assume that any offensive of such great proportions and moving with such speed cost us plenty.
Historian Stephen Remy
It's day one of what will be a six week long battle, the deadliest battle of the whole war for the US Military. At the start of this battle, the military orders a media blackout. No news from the front here. They're worried that anything about Allied troop movements or locations, or even losses, the Germans might be able to make use of it. But then, just a few days into this fight, there's one story, one big and terrible story that does make its way home.
Historian or War Correspondent
This story comes from a frontline clearing station in Belgium. A handful of doughboys describe today how a German tank force ruthlessly poured machine gun fire into a group of American prisoners who had already been disarmed.
Historian Stephen Remy
This was December 17, 1944. It was about 3 o' clock in the afternoon and a group of American soldiers in Belgium, in a town called Malmedy, they were ambushed by a Nazi SS tank unit, a Panzer unit. These Americans were lightly armed artillery observers. There was a brief firefight, but they were severely outgunned and the American troops fairly quickly surrendered.
Historian or War Correspondent
The German foot soldiers, working forward with tanks, disarmed the Americans and took them to an open field.
Historian Stephen Remy
The Germans lined the Americans up in rows in the field. They took all of their weapons. They searched them for valuables, for cigarettes or watches or wedding rings. They ordered them to put their hands behind their heads. But then, instead of taking the Americans into custody, these unarmed men who had surrendered, who were now prisoners of war, the Germans just opened fire.
Historian or War Correspondent
Soon a German soldier with a pistol opened fire from a car nearby, and motorized troops then raked the Americans with machine gun fire.
Willis Everett
They accepted the surrender of the Americans. They gathered them in a field, and then they executed nearly all of them.
Historian Stephen Remy
That's historian Stephen Remy. He's written one of the definitive historical accounts of this incident.
Willis Everett
U.S. army autopsy reported that 84 had been killed. And what's striking though, is that over half of them had been killed at close range. They were killed by bullet or bayonet or blunt instrument. It was an extremely brutal encounter.
Historian Stephen Remy
The Germans started with machine gun fire, then they used rifles and pistols. They shot at anyone on the ground who appeared to still be alive. They shot the wounded. They used their bayonets, they used the butts of their rifles. They beat and tortured and killed the survivors. The LA Times headline days later was just gut wrenching. The headline was, nazis Murdered Yanks then stomped on their faces.
Historian or War Correspondent
German sergeants moved among the fallen men, taking what they wanted and killing off the wounded. The living among the battalion made a dash for it, and they got back to American lines by scattering in the woods.
Historian Stephen Remy
Somehow there were American soldiers from the group that was initially captured who got away, who managed to survive it, and those Americans who miraculously made it out of there, who escaped. They immediately told the story. They explained in detail what they had just survived.
Historian or War Correspondent
They marched us up the road, they took everything that was worth a damn and took us over in a field. Guy pulls down on a tank and he opens a hatch and climbs out, fires a pistol into the crowd.
Willis Everett
These are terrified and deeply traumatized soldiers. Some of them were wounded, and they were telling this story only hours after the incident itself to American reporters. So the stories are very graphic.
Historian or War Correspondent
They came around with pistols and shot anyone who moved or moaned or tried to make a break.
Willis Everett
The ones who survived and played dead had to listen in many cases to the sounds of their fellow GIs being executed. In some cases, really, really brutally.
Historian or War Correspondent
I looked up, took notice, one German taking out a pistol and shooting two of our comrades. So after that, about 10 minutes, I heard a command fire and I hit the ground. Played dead for about an hour and a half. After that, I finally made a break to get away.
Historian Stephen Remy
The American public came to know about that massacre of American Prisoners of war. Not just because of survivors like that telling the press what happened, but also because of the aftermath, because of the physical evidence that was left behind. A month after the killings, in mid January 1945, American troops were finally able to get back to the site of those killings. They were finally able to get back to the town of Malmedy.
Historian or War Correspondent
Advancing troops near Malmedy returned to a battleground where their comrades had been captured.
Historian Stephen Remy
What those troops found when they returned under a blanket of fresh snow was devastating.
Willis Everett
They discovered the frozen, unburied corpses of 84American GIs.
Historian Stephen Remy
Press reports from the time described how American troops extricated the bodies of their comrades from the freezing mud and the snow. Some of the corpses still had their hands frozen in place above their heads. Stories ran in Stars and Stripes and in Yank magazine. A horrifying series of photos were printed in Life magazine, including one American GI whose eyes had been cut out. The images were so graphic they had to be blurred.
Willis Everett
Images of fallen American servicemen published during the war were incredibly rare. It was rarely, rarely seen. And this was the most graphic display of victims of a massacre, American soldiers, that the American public had seen during the war.
Historian Stephen Remy
The Malmedy Massacre. In all of the combat tales and tragedies that came home to the American public during the war in Europe against the Nazis, this one stood out. This wasn't combat. This was a crime that not only cost American lives, it left behind American survivors as witnesses. And all of that evidence in that frozen field. It was a huge news story all across the United States. It was enraging and galvanizing to the American public. It even turned the head of the supreme commander of all Allied forces in Europe. He vowed that the United States would find the specific Nazi SS unit that was responsible for what had happened at Malmedy. They'd be hunted down. They would be held to account. There would be justice for this. In time, the perpetrators of the Malmedy massacre would be caught and they would be put on trial. But then the whole thing would boomerang. The process of getting justice for this crime would become a political weapon against the United States. There would be an attack on this case, a successful attack that would also become a larger attack on American democracy and specifically on the American rule of law. It would involve graphic, even bizarre, literally unbelievable allegations, disproven but insistent lies, repeated and repeated and repeated parts of the American media that were unwilling or unable to stop themselves from being used to advance this attack. And most dangerous of all, it would involve powerful Americans, elected officials who were part of it and knew it, and who changed American politics forever. This is Rachel Maddow presents Ultra the.
Historian or War Correspondent
Above named defendants have been accused of participating in the shooting and torture of unarmed Allied nationals. The military court at Decal in Germany has just finished that trial of Hitler's SS men.
Willis Everett
After the trial, they realized they were in very, very serious trouble.
Historian or War Correspondent
Each of us wondered what defense we could make of these 74 accused.
Willis Everett
He began, hinting that he had an explosive story about what had really gone.
Narrator
We all belong outside. We're drawn to nature. Whether it's the recorded sounds of the ocean we doze off to or the succulents that adorn our homes. Nature makes all of our lives, well, better. Despite all this, we often go about our busy lives removed from it. But the outdoors is closer than we realize. With all trails. You can discover trails nearby and explore explore confidently with offline maps and on trail navigation. Download the free app today.
Advertiser
Busy work weeks can leave you feeling drained. Prolon's five day nutrition program rejuvenates you at the cellular level with boxes labeled by day so you know exactly what to eat. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition. Get 15% off plus a $40 bonus gift when you subscribe at prolonlife.com PandoraPromo these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. Products are not intended to diagnose, treat or prevent disease. See site for details at Designer Shoe.
Willis Everett
Warehouse we believe that shoes are an important part of, well, everything from first.
Narrator
Steps to first dates, from all nighters to all time personal best.
Willis Everett
From building pillow forts to to building.
Narrator
A life for all the big and small moments that make up your whole world. DSW is there and we've got just the shoes. Find a shoe for every you from brands you love at brag worthy prices at your DSW store or dsw.com.
Historian Stephen Remy
Episode 3 Malmedy the above named defendants have.
Historian or War Correspondent
Been accused of participating in the shooting.
Historian Stephen Remy
And torture of unarmed Allied nationals sitting in the dock. Inside the courtroom before the judges and the lawyers and the international press are more than 70 German soldiers. They're members of a unit that's been given a nickname. They're called the Blowtorch Battalion. They got that name for their habit of burning down civilian villages and murdering all the inhabitants in the German offensive that began the Battle of the Bulge in December 1944. This unit is accused of indiscriminate killings of Belgian civilians. This is the unit that's also accused of the massacre of American POWs in the town of Malmedy.
Historian or War Correspondent
Court will come to order. The prosecution is ready to proceed with this case.
Historian Stephen Remy
U.S. army investigators had scoured hospitals and prisoner of war camps all over Europe to find the members of this particular German Panzer unit. To find these defendants, we expect the.
Historian or War Correspondent
Evidence to show that the troops of the 1st SS Panzer Regiment proceeded to execute their orders to kill unarmed and defenseless prisoners of war and unarmed Allied civilians with zeal and enthusiasm.
Historian Stephen Remy
Now they sat inside a makeshift courtroom that had been set up on the grounds of the decommissioned concentration camp at Dachau.
Historian or War Correspondent
The court is declared to be properly constituted. The trial will be conducted in open court.
Historian Stephen Remy
The foundation of the prosecution's case is straightforward. The defendants admitted they did it. They admitted they killed civilians. They admitted they killed those American POWs. They had described what they'd done in detailed confessions that were obtained by U.S. army investigators who questioned the Nazis while they were in custody and who, according.
Historian or War Correspondent
To the statements of the accused, Joachim Hoffman, Sick Greve Yackel, Gustav Springer and his own confession, fired a machine gun into those prisoners who still turned and twisted on the ground in the field at the crossroads south of Malmedy.
Willis Everett
These former SS men turned on each other. They turned on each other when they gave their confessions.
Historian Stephen Remy
That's historian Stephen Remy.
Willis Everett
Again, these sworn statements became the foundation for the prosecution's case at the trial.
Historian Stephen Remy
The fact that there are comprehensive confessions from these defendants, it makes the whole thing a bit of an uphill climb for the defense at the trial. For the U.S. army lawyer who's assigned to serve as defense counsel for these Nazi soldiers. That lawyer is a U.S. army colonel, a man from Georgia. His name is Willis Everett.
Willis Everett
Willis Everett was shocked to find out that he would be the lead defense attorney in this very high visibility case. He was determined to do the best he could by his clients, even though I think he thought the case was largely hopeless.
Historian Stephen Remy
Willis Everett knew that it would be pointless to argue that this crime hadn't happened. Everybody knew that the crime had happened. He knew it would be pointless to argue that these defendants hadn't done it. After all, they admitted they had done it.
Historian or War Correspondent
When the defense staff was assembled just three months ago, each of us wondered what defense we could make for these 74 accused.
Historian Stephen Remy
There had been a moment before trial when Everett thought he might have a hook for a defense strategy.
Willis Everett
Shortly before the trial begins, Willis Everett starts hearing reports that some of the prisoners had been abused by American interrogators. And he doesn't know quite what to do at first, but he is responsible for defending his clients. And if it's true that any of the accused men were coerced into signing false confessions, then this is something that had to be brought out.
Historian Stephen Remy
The prosecution's case depended on those confessions. So if there was a problem with the confessions, that was a very big deal. If the claims were true. But the claims were not true, as Everett himself soon learned.
Willis Everett
Everett does decide to go to superior officers to report what he had heard. And they did the right thing. They dispatched an investigator to Dachau, where the accused men were then being held. He looked into these accusations and found them to be baseless. And at the time, so did Willis Everett. At the time, we know that Willis Everett had to admit that a handful of the accused who were making claims about having been beaten, that they were lying.
Historian Stephen Remy
They were lying. Willis Everett even acknowledged that in a letter home to his family at the time. So this little episode was a brief detour on the way to trial. But the men who made these claims admitted they were false, and so did Willis Everett. And so the trial went ahead. In court, Everett argued a few different ways that the Germans just shouldn't be held responsible for what they'd done, for what they admitted they had done. It wasn't a particularly powerful defense. And from the prosecution side they had very compelling witness testimony to draw from, including from American survivors of the massacre.
Historian or War Correspondent
We were motioned into the field, shoulder to shoulder, 20 man front approximately. He then fired two shots into our group. The first shot, a man to my right front, approximately here, with his hands up in this manner. Went down like this. How many bodies do you estimate you saw lying in the field when you made your break? I estimate well over a hundred.
Historian Stephen Remy
These witnesses, the survivors, testified in detail about what they had seen. The Nazi defendants themselves also testified. The U.S. army interrogators who spoke German, who obtained the defendants confessions, they testified about that too.
Historian or War Correspondent
Bolts told us about the shooting of the prisoners and about the fact that he fired his machine gun into those prisoners who were still alive in the field at the crossroads.
Historian Stephen Remy
The trial lasted two months overall. And then it was done.
Historian or War Correspondent
The military court at Decal in Germany has just finished that trial of Hitler's SS men who were charged with violating the rules of war. The specific act was the slaughter of American prisoners at Malmedy in Belgium during the Battle of the Bulge. And the court today found them guilty.
Historian Stephen Remy
All of them were found guilty. No acquittals. The lightest sentences were between 10 and 20 years in prison. But most of the Malmedy defendants, 43 of the Nazis who were put on trial were sentenced to death. And if that were the end of the story, the Malmedy trial would have gone down as one more disturbing war story from World War II. A massacre of American POWs. The perpetrators captured, put on trial, convicted, held accountable for their crimes. But that would not be how this story went. And that's in part because of that American lawyer, Willis Everett, who had led the defense in the Malmedy case.
Historian or War Correspondent
May it please the court.
Historian Stephen Remy
Willis Everett was a Georgia lawyer. He was the son of a Georgia lawyer. His family was very well connected back home. It was thanks to some of his dad's friends that Everett had been able to talk his way into an officer's commission in the army, even though he technically didn't qualify for one. During World War II, Willis Everett was active duty army for the entire duration of the war. But he never really left home. He stayed in Atlanta. He worked every day inside the Atlanta post office in a low key army intelligence job.
Historian or War Correspondent
This is the news that electrified the world. Unconditional surrender.
Historian Stephen Remy
It was not until after the surrender of Germany and Japan that Willis Everett finally got orders to prepare to deploy to Europe in the fall of 1945.
Willis Everett
He had become a judge advocate lawyer and he, he had no courtroom experience.
Historian Stephen Remy
Before shipping out, the army assigned Willis Everett to do a training course at Columbia University in New York City. From New York, Everett wrote to his wife back home complaining that when he went to church one Sunday morning, there were two black people in the choir. He told her their presence in the choir, quote, spoiled the service in the dorm where he was assigned to live at Columbia. Everett was outraged to learn that a black student was on the same floor as him and was therefore sharing the same bathroom. Everett demanded that the black student be moved off his floor. He told his wife in a letter home that he couldn't, quote, stomach the toilet business. Columbia would not move the black student. Willis Everett moved himself out of the dorm instead. That training course in New York was just a matter of weeks. He was soon on his way to Germany where he would bring his own experience and his own worldview to bear on his defense of the Nazi war criminals who committed the Malmedy Massacre.
Willis Everett
Before and during the trial, as Willis Everett became increasingly frustrated, his prejudices came to the surface. In private correspondence with his family, he lashed out. I found correspondence in the National Archives from Willis Everett to Army officials to, to civilians. These expressions comported more generally with his outlook on the occupation which he considered to be corrupt and unjust and vindictive. And I think that resonated deeply with his sense of himself as a Southerner, as a proud Georgian, as a rebel. As he described himself to another officer, it's easy to see how he would find himself sympathetic to a proud nation that had been defeated militarily and was now occupied in general. His sympathies lay with the defeated Germans and much less so with their victims. He thought the Germans were being victimized.
Historian Stephen Remy
Willis Everett sympathized with the Germans, with his Nazi defendants in the Malmedy case but also with the German people who were under Allied occupation after their side lost the war.
Willis Everett
When he was in occupied Germany, he didn't like what he saw. He saw American soldiers cavorting with German women. And all these things offended his conservative sensibilities.
Historian Stephen Remy
Willis Everett believed that the post war Allied occupation of Germany was wrong. He believed that America putting Nazis on trial for war crimes was wrong. He believed that his own case, the prosecution for the Malmedy Massacre, he believed that was wrong and morally illegitimate. And he believed all of these things because in his mind it was the Jews who were behind all of it.
Willis Everett
Willis Everett was an anti Semite. He became convinced that the whole investigation and the whole trial had been corrupt and corrupted mainly by Jews.
Historian Stephen Remy
During the Malmedy trial Willis Everett privately railed about what he called the overproduction of Jews in the US Military. He called his co defense lawyer, a quote, nosy, talking, arguing Jew. He complained about the quote, Jewish occupation of Germany. He called a fellow U.S. army officer involved in the court proceedings a quote, Jew law member.
Willis Everett
There's no question that Willis Everett was deeply prejudiced. And he wasn't talking about what he considered to be a few bad apples. His anti Semitism was of the conspiratorial variety which was so common then and since that the punitive occupation was driven by Jewish interests, driven by a kind of Jewish conspiracy and Jewish desire for revenge. And he took the position that the Jews were simply using the investigation and the trial to seek revenge for what the Nazis had done.
Historian Stephen Remy
The entire thing for Willis Everett, the investigation of the Malmedy Massacre, the trial of its perpetrators, he believed the whole thing was just a Jewish conspiracy.
Willis Everett
This was baseless. There was absolutely no truth to any of it. But it was a perception that Willis Everett held.
Historian Stephen Remy
When Willis Everett's defense of the Malmedy Massacre perpetrators failed in court when all of his defendants were convicted, he did not accept the loss. He dug in for a new kind of Fight. Just a few months after the trial ended, Willis Everett shipped back to the United States from Germany. And he came back with a plan.
Willis Everett
He started talking to the press and began hinting that he had an explosive story about what had really gone on. He wrote a long petition which distorted the trial record and suggested that all kinds of bad things were going on during the investigation.
Historian Stephen Remy
Willis Everett wrote a petition to the US army about the Malmedy case. It resurrected those false abuse allegations that a few defendants had tried floating before the trial. Allegations that Everett himself knew and had admitted were false.
Willis Everett
The interrogators had gone too far and the result was that the accused men had been coerced into signing false confessions.
Historian Stephen Remy
Within just days of Everett returning to the United States from Germany, these allegations he made in his supposedly confidential petition to the US army, it all started to turn up in the press.
Willis Everett
He was bluffing because he didn't have the goods, he didn't have the proof. But increasingly the press in the United States is picking up on this story and they're starting to quote Willis Everett. And this starts to put some pressure.
Historian Stephen Remy
On the army as his story starts to get attention in the press. These allegations from this defense lawyer about this very high profile momity case. The U.S. army's War Crimes unit feels pressured to respond. They tell reporters they are baffled by Everett's claims that he didn't raise any of these supposed concerns at trial. But in response to Everett's criticism and to all the press that he was getting for it, the army does decide to launch a review of the trial. The review finds no basis for these claims of abuse. Then they launched a second review of the trial which again found no basis for any claims of abuse. Then they launched a third review of the trial. And then they launched a fourth review of the trial. And all of them came to the same result. This had been a very high profile case with a lot of public attention, a lot of public emotion behind it. The U.S. government, the U.S. army, was very focused on the perceived legitimacy of of the war crimes trials in Germany. With criticism of this trial for this notorious crime making front pages all over the country, the army was willing to bend over backwards. They reviewed everything.
Willis Everett
The army carried out four extensive reviews of the investigation and the trial. All four reviews of the case came to the same conclusion. No one had been tortured. The torture claims were baseless.
Historian Stephen Remy
Now, some of these reviews did say that the sentences might have been too harsh for some of the defendants. Maybe more of them should have received long prison sentences. Fewer of them should have been sentenced to hang. But none of the four separate reviews of the Malmedy case found fault with the convictions or with the trial. There was no evidence that the defendants had been systematically abused or that their confessions had been forced. Nevertheless, here was this American, this very well connected American colonel, saying that unspecified bad things had gone on during this investigation. He was saying that the perpetrators of the Malmedy massacre, the Blowtorch battalion, these convicted Nazi SS war criminals, they were the victims here. As confounding as this was for the US army and the War Crimes unit, this would also be a light bulb moment for the convicted Nazi soldiers themselves. They, of course, were looking to avoid execution, looking to avoid their long prison sentences. Maybe this was a way they could get out of it.
Willis Everett
We know that the torture accusations were not true, but nearly all of them claimed that they had been physically and psychologically abused. Limbs broken, bones had been broken. It was very graphic.
Historian Stephen Remy
Even more ominously, this was also a light bulb moment inside Germany for surviving committed Nazis who thought, well, here was something they could work with too. Here was a weapon for them and here was an American showing them the way to use it. That's next.
Narrator
We all belong outside. We're drawn to nature. Whether it's the recorded sounds of the ocean we doze off to or the succulents that adorn our homes, nature makes all of our lives, well, better. Despite all this, we often go about our busy lives removed from it. But the outdoors is closer than we realize. With alltrails, you can discover trails nearby and explore confidently with offline maps and on trail navigation. Download the free app today. I've never felt like this before. It's like you just get me. I feel like my true self with you. Does that sound crazy? And it doesn't hurt that you're gorgeous. Okay, that's it. I'm taking you home with me. I mean, you can't find shoes this good just anywhere. Find a shoe for every you from brands you love like Birkenstock, Nike, Adidas and more at your DSW store or.
Advertiser
Dsw.Com busy work weeks can leave you feeling drained. Prolon's five day nutrition program rejuvenates you at the cellular level with boxes labeled by day so you know exactly what to eat. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition. Get 15% off plus a $40 bonus gift when you subscribe at prolonlife.com PandoraPromo these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. Products are not intended to diagnose, treat or prevent disease. See site for details.
Willis Everett
After the trial, Willis Everett was exhausted and he was very, very angry.
Historian Stephen Remy
When the American defense lawyer from the Malmedy trial, Willis Everett, started telling American officials and the American press that something had been wrong with the Malmedy case. When he was claiming vaguely that somehow the Nazi defendants in that case, the perpetrators of the Malmedy massacre, somehow they were the real victims, Everett had the idea that maybe if he could sell this story, literally sell it, it might really be worth something.
Willis Everett
He also was convinced that he was sitting on top of a sensational story.
Historian Stephen Remy
That's historian Stephen Remy again, a story.
Willis Everett
That he believed would be worth a lot of money.
Historian Stephen Remy
Willis Everett thought the press might pay him quite a bit for a wild story about the famous Malmedy Massacre. He also thought if he could somehow make himself the hero of the story, maybe it might lead to something even bigger.
Willis Everett
There's some evidence to suggest that Willis Everett imagined that Hollywood would take up this story and that maybe Henry Fondo or Jimmy Stewart would play him.
Historian Stephen Remy
The Malmedy Massacre trial was Willis Everett's first ever criminal trial. It was a really high profile thing, this Malmedy case. And so the outcome of it, with every defendant convicted, among all the other things, that that was for Willis Everett personally, it was a humiliation, one that he very much wanted to reverse.
Willis Everett
He had lost the case, of course, very badly.
Historian Stephen Remy
In Willis Everett's mind, it was the Jews who were to blame for his failure. Jews in the US Army War Crimes Unit, Jews in the US army more broadly. The whole Allied occupation of Germany was a Jewish plot. In his mind. If he could get this case reopened, maybe he could free his Nazi clients and vindicate his own performance at trial, maybe vindicate his own prejudices as well. Maybe there could be some fame and fortune in it too. But after Everett had lost the Malmedy case in Germany, he'd also left the country and come back to the United States. His convicted Nazi clients were left behind, languishing in Landsberg Prison. When Everett began agitating over this case in the United States, his old clients back in Germany learned that there was a new lawyer who wanted to represent them, to try to get them clemency. A German lawyer this time, one who was ubiquitous at the post war trials. He was the lawyer who represented more Nazi war criminals than any other lawyer anywhere. And he had a mixed record in the courtroom. A lot of his clients were hanged and. But he was definitely committed, deeply committed to the work. And his commitment was not just as a lawyer.
Willis Everett
Rudolf Aschenauer was a German lawyer and a former Nazi who had not really renounced his allegiance to National Socialism after.
Historian Stephen Remy
The end of World War II. Committed, unrepentant Nazis were not supposed to be allowed to practice law in Germany. Rudolf Aschenauer slipped through those cracks.
Willis Everett
He made it his life's mission to defend Nazi criminals.
Historian Stephen Remy
While Aschenauer was representing Nazi war criminals, he also was part of every significant post war effort to try to reorganize the Nazi movement inside Germany. He was connected to a Nazi return to power plot led by former SS officers, one that made front page news all over the world when it was busted up by British Intelligence. He also was a leader and a successor to the Nazi party that got banned in Germany.
Willis Everett
The Socialist Reich Party wanted to create a new German Reich.
Historian Stephen Remy
The US pressured Germany to ban that party on the grounds that you can't let someone on the ballot if they plan to dismantle democracy once they're elected.
Willis Everett
The West German Supreme Court does ban the Socialist Reich Party. Now what does somebody like Aschenauer do after that? Well, he briefly is involved in trying to rebuild the party under a different guise.
Historian Stephen Remy
This lawyer Aschenauer was a key player in all of those plots and more. U.S. army counterintelligence kept him under surveillance in Germany for years. They also used him as an informant.
Willis Everett
He's an ideologue, certainly. He's a cagey character.
Historian Stephen Remy
All the while his day job was representing Nazi defendants at various war crimes trials. That's because for him, these two things went great together for the Nazi return to power movement that he was part of. Stoking resentment against these prosecutions was their best issue. It was their best propaganda tool to try to set the public against the Allies, against the west, against America specifically.
Willis Everett
They fought very hard to undermine war crimes trials.
Historian or War Correspondent
The day after a full hearing, that American military court reached its decision. Guilty on all counts.
Willis Everett
For them, war crimes trials were simply one arm of this machine of punishment that the Allies were imposing on the Germans.
Historian Stephen Remy
This had been Rudolf Aschenauer's argument in court and, and in public and in the press. The Nazis had done nothing wrong, at least nothing any more wrong than any other country. These prosecutions should stop. Anybody convicted at these trials, they should all be freed.
Willis Everett
They considered Germans to be victims, victims of the Jews, victims of a punitive occupation.
Historian Stephen Remy
In time, thousands of Germans would turn up for for repeated large demonstrations outside Landsberg Prison calling for all the convicted war criminals to be released. But it was the Malmedy trial, specifically where they really hit gold.
Historian or War Correspondent
This is a duly constituted military government general court for the trial of war criminal.
Willis Everett
Aschenauer was representing most of the men convicted in the Malmedy trial who were.
Historian Stephen Remy
Still in prison when Aschenauer took over the Malmedy case, trying to get the case reopened. The real pressure to force that outcome was happening in the United States.
Willis Everett
Willis Everett was determined to put political pressure and public pressure on the army to retry the entire case, and he took a maximalist position. For Everett, it was all or nothing. Increasingly, he was making thinly veiled references to Jewish investigators and the Jewish Law Court member. They were recent Americans. They were animated by a spirit of revenge.
Historian Stephen Remy
Rudolf Aschenauer and the Nazi return to power movement in Germany had already been making these kinds of arguments, using this issue to try to rile up the German people, to rekindle their nationalism, to once again create a sense that Germany was being unfairly persecuted and the Jews were behind it. Now, here was an American colonel backing them up, spreading the same kind of story in the United States. This was gold. And so inside Landsberg Prison, the convicted perpetrators of the Malmedy massacre signed up with this committed Nazi.
Willis Everett
With.
Historian Stephen Remy
With Aschenauer as their new lawyer, and with his help, they got to work.
Willis Everett
They had all signed sworn statements. They had all signed confessions. So they started writing new statements in which they refuted their sworn statements. And nearly all of them claimed that they had been physically and psychologically abused.
Historian Stephen Remy
Now, a few of these defendants had tried something like this before trial and they'd been found out and they hadn't gotten away with it. But now this time, they would all commit to the bit. They all wrote new sworn statements saying they were all horribly, physically and psychologically abused. So in America, here's Willis Everett trying to reopen this case that he lost, trying to make the Malmedy trial into some kind of big scandal in the United States. In Germany, the Nazis convicted in that trial are working with their new Nazi lawyer to cook up a whole new story about what happened in the trial, to say that they hadn't really done anything wrong, they hadn't actually committed the massacre. They'd all only falsely confessed because they'd been forced to by terrible abuse. They'd been tortured, specifically by Jewish U.S. army investigators.
Willis Everett
Now, if you read these, they read like a hacked screenwriter's attempt at dramatizing torture. That they had had limbs broken, that they had been assaulted, that their testicles had been damaged, that bones had been broken. It was very graphic.
Historian Stephen Remy
It was very graphic. It was also very, very made up. And because these statements were fiction that freed them up to be as gory as possible, to be as shocking and unforgettable as they could imagine. To hopefully make these things so gross they'd be irresistible to the press. So they just went for wasn't just that they were beaten with clubs and thrown downstairs. They said they were all systematically kicked in the genitals until permanent damage was done. They said they were denied not just food but also water, so they had to drink out of their toilets to stay alive. One guy said investigators had tied his hands to a table, then put sharpened matchsticks under his fingernails and then lit them on fire. They even said they were subjected to spiritual torture by these vengeful American Jews who forced them into defiling symbols of Christianity. Christianity in blood soaked satanic rituals involving crucifixes and candles.
Willis Everett
They're just unbelievable. They're just too incredible to be believed.
Historian Stephen Remy
Inside Landsberg Prison, the convicted perpetrators of the Malmedy massacre, they sat together in the lecture hall to write up these affidavits, these over the top horror stories about how they were supposedly forced by these sadistic demonic Americans to make confessions to crimes that they had not committed. Some of them later said that during their time in prison, this exercise, this group effort at writing these fantastical torture stories, they said it was a lot of fun. They called it their favorite sport.
Willis Everett
The convicted men were writing these statements with the assistance and guidance of their ex Nazi lawyers. And these statements were being smart out of Landsberg Prison by the convicted men's ex Nazi lawyers.
Historian Stephen Remy
These lurid, shocking new lies about the Malmedy prosecution. They definitely were not true. And Willis Everett himself knew for sure that these were not true. He had admitted that even before the trial. But these lies were so shocking, they were so tabloid ready. If they got enough attention, maybe they would do the trick for Willis Everett in the United States. Undo the insult of having lost this high profile case, make a name for himself in the meantime, maybe even make some money. These false tales were also exactly what Rudolf Aschenauer needed in Germany. Maybe this could overturn the convictions of the Malmedy defendants and free these Nazi clients of his. But maybe also this could free all of his clients. Maybe this could discredit the war crimes prosecutions altogether, which was key to his overall political goal of returning some form of Nazi rule to Germany. Parallel efforts meeting both of their needs. But if they were going to get all the way there, they were going to need more help and they knew where to get it. Both the guy in Germany and the guy in the United States had a pretty good idea about who else in America might be able to help.
Historian or War Correspondent
And I only wish there were more Americans in the United States of America that loved America first.
Historian Stephen Remy
Before America's entry into the war, certain forces on the American far right, including in Congress, were working with fascists at home and abroad, taking Nazi propaganda and spreading it willingly to the American people and damn the consequences that had been before the war. Now after the war, this would be round two.
Willis Everett
American congressmen start picking up on this story.
Historian or War Correspondent
The senators are probing reports that the Germans were beaten and starved to get confessions from them.
Willis Everett
He was very, very badly informed. He did not know what he was talking about.
Historian or War Correspondent
He was not bound by the truth or by facts, quite willing to ruin the lives of people who got in his way.
Historian Stephen Remy
It would infect American politics in a way that would ultimately cost at least one US Senator his life.
Historian or War Correspondent
Lester Hunt had been in the Senate only a couple of months when the Senate decided it would investigate the Malmony Massacre.
Historian Stephen Remy
It would propel one of the most damaging anti democratic demagogues in U.S. history toward the peak of American power.
Historian or War Correspondent
So many of them said, oh, we like what you're trying to do, but oh, we don't like your method. I've heard that over and over and over, like a broken phonograph record.
Historian Stephen Remy
That is next time on Rachel Maddow Presents Ultra. Rachel Maddow presents Ultra is a production of msnbc. This episode was written by myself, Mike Jarvitz and Kelsey Desiderio. The series is executive produced by myself and Mike Jarvitz. It's produced by Kelsey Desiderio and Jen Mulraney Donovan. Our associate producer is Vasilios Karsilakis. Archival support from Holly Klopchin. Audio engineering and sound designed by Bob Mallory and Katherine Anderson. Our head of audio production is Bryson Barnes. Our senior executive producers are Corey Nazzo and Laura Conaway. Our web producer is Will Femia. Aisha Turner is the executive producer for MSNBC Audio. Rebecca Cutler is the senior vice president for content strategy at msnbc. Archival radio material is from NBC News via the Library of Congress. A special thanks to Stephen Remy. You really should read his excellent book. It's called the Malmedy the War Crimes Trial Controversy. There's been a lot written about that trial and about that controversy, but Stephen Remy's work is absolutely seminal. Couldn't recommend it more strongly. You can find much more about this series at our website. Msnbc.com ultra.com.
Historian or War Correspondent
Today in America, the survivors of these massacres, the mothers, fathers, sweethearts, wives and children of those comrades of ours who so needlessly fell not on the field of battle but from the tender mercies of the SS are awaiting your findings. From their deaths. Let there come a clear understanding to our former enemies that the end does not justify the means. It must be brought home to the German people that the principle of extermination which guided them in their last battle will not create for them a new and better world, but will only bring disaster to their homeland and to themselves. Let their punishment be adequate for their crimes. There, you got it, boy.
Advertiser
Busy work weeks can leave you feeling drained. Prolon's five day nutrition program rejuvenates you at the cellular level with boxes labeled by day so you know exactly what to eat. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition. Get 15% off plus a $40 bonus gift when you subs@prolonlife.com PandoraProMo these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. Products are not intended to diagnose, treat or prevent disease. See site for details.
Rachel Maddow Presents: Ultra - Season 2, Episode 3: "Malmedy"
Release Date: November 26, 2024
In this gripping episode of "Rachel Maddow Presents," host Rachel Maddow delves deep into the harrowing events surrounding the Malmedy Massacre during World War II and the subsequent war crimes trial that not only sought justice but also ignited profound political repercussions in post-war America. This episode, titled "Malmedy," uncovers the intricate web of betrayal, prejudice, and conspiracy that emerged from one of the war's most brutal chapters.
The episode begins by setting the stage in the Ardennes Forest of Belgium amid the Battle of the Bulge, one of the deadliest confrontations for U.S. forces. On December 17, 1944, a group of American soldiers stationed in Malmedy were ambushed by a Nazi SS Panzer unit.
Historian Stephen Remy explains, "It's day one of what will be a six-week-long battle, the deadliest battle of the whole war for the US Military" (01:21). The American troops, primarily lightly armed artillery observers, were swiftly overwhelmed and forced to surrender after a brief firefight.
However, instead of being treated as prisoners of war, the Nazis committed a heinous atrocity. Historian or War Correspondent recounts, "The Germans lined the Americans up in rows in the field... but then, instead of taking the Americans into custody, these unarmed men... just opened fire" (02:39).
Willis Everett, a U.S. Army lawyer present at the scene, provides a chilling firsthand account:
“They accepted the surrender of the Americans. They gathered them in a field, and then they executed nearly all of them.” (03:13)
An autopsy revealed that 84 American soldiers were brutally killed, with over half of the victims dying at close range through bullets, bayonets, or blunt instruments. Historian Stephen Remy notes,
"The LA Times headline days later was just gut-wrenching: 'Nazis Murdered Yanks then stomped on their faces.'" (03:46)
As American troops regained control of Malmedy in mid-January 1945, they uncovered the frozen, unburied corpses of the slain soldiers. These grisly discoveries were extensively covered in the press, with Life Magazine publishing some of the most graphic images of war atrocities ever seen by the American public. Willis Everett emphasizes the rarity and impact of these images:
"Images of fallen American servicemen published during the war were incredibly rare. It was the most graphic display of victims of a massacre that the American public had seen during the war." (07:01)
The massacre not only shocked the nation but also galvanized public opinion against the Nazis. Historian Stephen Remy asserts:
"The Malmedy Massacre stood out. This wasn't combat. This was a crime that not only cost American lives, it left behind American survivors as witnesses." (07:20)
In the wake of the massacre, a military court was convened at Dachau, Germany, to try 74 German SS soldiers accused of committing war crimes. Historian or War Correspondent details the gravity of the proceedings:
"Each of us wondered what defense we could make for these 74 accused." (09:40)
Willis Everett was appointed as the lead defense attorney, a role he approached with a mix of determination and prejudice. Despite acknowledging the defendants' confessions, Everett sought to undermine the legitimacy of the trial. Historian Stephen Remy explains:
"Willis Everett knew that it would be pointless to argue that these crimes hadn't happened. Everybody knew that the crime had happened." (14:08)
The prosecution presented compelling evidence, including detailed testimonies from American survivors and the defendants' own confessions. The trial concluded with a unanimous guilty verdict. Historian Stephen Remy summarizes:
"All of them were found guilty. No acquittals. The lightest sentences were between 10 and 20 years in prison. Most of the Malmedy defendants, 43 of the Nazis who were put on trial were sentenced to death." (18:31)
Despite the clear evidence and his role in the prosecution's downfall, Willis Everett was not satisfied. Deeply prejudiced and harboring anti-Semitic views, Everett believed that the war crimes trial was sabotaged by a Jewish conspiracy aimed at revenge. Historian Stephen Remy reveals:
"Willis Everett was an anti-Semite. He became convinced that the whole investigation and the whole trial had been corrupt and corrupted mainly by Jews." (22:59)
Everett's frustrations led him to fabricate claims of abuse and coercion during the trial. In private, he expressed doubts about the legitimacy of the confessions, despite knowing they were false. Historian Stephen Remy states:
"Everett decided to go to superior officers to report what he had heard. But the claims were not true... the trials proceeded fairly." (16:33)
Undeterred by multiple army reviews that confirmed the trial's integrity, Everett sought to manipulate public opinion. He collaborated with Rudolf Aschenauer, a former Nazi lawyer dedicated to defending war criminals. Together, they orchestrated a campaign to discredit the Malmedy trial, spreading outrageous and unfounded allegations of torture inflicted by Jewish investigators.
The false narratives propagated by Everett and Aschenauer found fertile ground in a post-war America grappling with its own internal conflicts. Historian Stephen Remy highlights the political manipulation that ensued:
"This would infect American politics in a way that would ultimately cost at least one US Senator his life." (44:55)
Everett's campaign not only aimed to exonerate his Nazi clients but also sought to undermine the broader principles of the American rule of law and democracy. His relentless pursuit of discrediting the trial contributed to the rise of anti-democratic forces within the U.S., setting the stage for significant political turmoil.
"Malmedy" serves as a powerful examination of how prejudice and conspiracy theories can distort justice and influence political landscapes. Rachel Maddow successfully unpacks the complexities of the Malmedy Massacre, the ensuing trial, and the subsequent attempts to rewrite history for personal and ideological gains. This episode not only sheds light on a dark chapter of World War II but also offers a cautionary tale about the vulnerabilities of democratic institutions to manipulation and hatred.
Notable Quotes:
Willis Everett (03:13):
“They accepted the surrender of the Americans. They gathered them in a field, and then they executed nearly all of them.”
Willis Everett (05:13):
“The ones who survived and played dead had to listen in many cases to the sounds of their fellow GIs being executed. In some cases, really, really brutally.”
Historian Stephen Remy (22:59):
"Willis Everett was an anti-Semite. He became convinced that the whole investigation and the whole trial had been corrupt and corrupted mainly by Jews."
Willis Everett (24:13):
“This was baseless. There was absolutely no truth to any of it.”
Historian Stephen Remy (37:05):
"This had been Rudolf Aschenauer's argument in court and, and in public and in the press. The Nazis had done nothing wrong, at least nothing any more wrong than any other country."
For an in-depth exploration, Rachel Maddow highly recommends Stephen Remy's seminal book, "Malmedy: The War Crimes Trial Controversy," which provides comprehensive insights into the trial and its lasting impact on American and German societies.
To learn more about the series, visit msnbc.com/ultra.
This episode was written by Rachel Maddow, Mike Jarvitz, and Kelsey Desiderio, with executive production by Mike Jarvitz and Rachel Maddow. Special thanks to Stephen Remy for his invaluable contributions.