The Discarded

Summary

Radio Atlantic: “The Discarded” (January 22, 2026)

Overview

This episode of Radio Atlantic, hosted by Hanna Rosen, dives into the ongoing transformation of the federal government workforce in the U.S., particularly focusing on the mass exodus—voluntary and forced—of experienced civil servants during the second Trump administration. Through insightful interviews with former federal workers, the episode examines not only the personal and public consequences of these departures but also challenges common assumptions about government bureaucracy. The conversations reveal the invisible yet critical work performed by civil servants, the ripple effects of their removal, and the daunting task of rebuilding government capacity and trust.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Hidden Importance of Federal Work (00:10–02:23)

• Ryan Hippensteel and Geodesy:
  • Hippensteel, former chief at the National Geodetic Survey, describes the complex, ever-shifting science of geodesy—measuring and tracking the shape of the Earth—vital for GPS, disaster relief, precision farming, accurate shipping, and even weaponry.
  • Quote:

    “The Earth truly is changing. You have subsidence, you have uplift, you have the gravity field underneath the earth changing…” – Ryan Hippensteel (00:55)

• Invisibility and Significance:
  • These services are generally unrecognized but form the backbone of daily stability, from personal navigation to national security and commerce.

2. The Federal Workforce Exodus (02:23–03:36)

• Mass Departures Under a New Administration:
  • Over 300,000 workers left the federal government in Trump’s first year back, through firings, forced resignations, and buyouts (02:31).
  • Workers describe abrupt, sometimes traumatic endings to meaningful careers.
  • Quote:

    “Careers ended in capricious, even cruel ways.” – Hana Rosen (03:11)

3. Human Stories Behind the Numbers (03:36–09:59)

• Franklin Foer’s Reporting:

  • Foer, Atlantic staff writer, interviewed 75–80 former federal workers to illustrate both the scale and intimacy of the losses (04:56).
  • Discovery of a vast array of essential, little-known government roles, each with broad impact (04:20).

• Passion and Purpose in Public Service:

  • Workers described deep pride, patriotism, and sense of mission, which don’t fit the “faceless bureaucrat” cliché.
  • Quotes:

    “I think that there’s a lot of the ethos that’s… not quite the same, but the same spirit [as the military].” – Franklin Foer (05:05)
    “These were people who loved their jobs.” – Franklin Foer (06:12)
    “There was something almost cathartic… to talk about the thing that they were most enthusiastic about.” – Franklin Foer (06:59)

4. Ground-Level Impact: Voices from the Front Lines

• Elizabeth Poole, EPA (06:59–09:59):
  • Former Children’s Environmental Health Coordinator, worked to protect children from hazards like lead paint.
  • Quit after being barred from responding to a lead poisoning crisis under the Trump administration.
  • Poole’s role was not refilled, raising concerns about future oversight and expertise.
  • Quotes:

    “They weren’t going to let us really protect children in a meaningful, scientifically sound way.” – Elizabeth Poole (08:41)
    “Russell Voight said he wanted to traumatize the federal workforce. They’re also being traumatized on a daily basis.” – Elizabeth Poole (09:13)

5. Loss of Expertise and Institutional Memory (09:59–14:12)

• Irreplaceable Human Capital:
  • Foer and interviewees emphasize how government invests heavily in specialized training and expertise, which cannot be quickly replaced (10:33–11:18).
• Michael Feinberg, FBI (11:18–16:37):
  • 16-year agent specializing in Chinese counterintelligence, forced out due to political loyalty concerns.
  • Illustrates the bureaucratic investment: years of training, language immersion, and unique experience.
  • Quotes:

    “Personnel are [not] fungible… every year… you’re providing more value simply because you have more expertise and better judgment.” – Michael Feinberg (13:24)
    “Even now, remembering leaving the FBI has been the defining heartbreak of my life.” – Michael Feinberg (15:57)
    “For a public servant who has not just dedicated their life, but often risked that life... to have that privilege ripped [away] for a petty and political reason is… too much to bear.” – Michael Feinberg (16:24)

6. Historical Context: Why the Civil Service Exists (17:37–19:15)

• From Patronage to Professionalism:
  • Foer explains the move, after the Civil War, from political patronage to merit-based hiring, hiring experts to build national capacity and trust.
  • Government roles in science, public health, and regulation underpinned America’s 20th-century power.

7. The Value of Experience – and the Cost of Losing It (19:15–21:46)

• Paula Soldner, Food & Safety Inspection (19:15–21:46):
  • Federal inspector for meat and poultry, also a union chair.
  • Vividly describes the gritty, demanding nature of inspection work and the criticality of veteran knowledge.
  • Chose early retirement as many peers did.
  • Quotes:

    “You can be as book smart as you want to be until you step into the reality, onto that slaughter floor.” – Paula Soldner (20:53)
    “I dread the long term effects when there is life that is lost because of food safety issues that are not getting corrected.” – Paula Soldner (21:15)

8. The Civil Service at its Peak and Its Greatest Achievements (22:03–25:15)

• Heyday of Federal Ambition and Innovation:
  • Major growth and trust post-World War II, and during massive government projects like Apollo.
  • Insert: JFK “We choose to go to the moon…” speech (16:48, 22:28)
• Eric Green, NIH & Human Genome Project (23:02–26:13):
  • Thirty-one-year NIH veteran, led the Human Genome Project, a “moonshot” in biology.
  • Stresses the enormous, ongoing value of such government-led initiatives—returning investments that the private sector would never match.
  • Forced out by the Trump administration, raising concerns about demoralized scientists and future recruitment.
  • Quotes:

    “What the Human Genome Project did was to read out for the very first time the exact order of the building blocks… in all human DNA.” – Eric Green (23:27)
    “There was no private equity… ever going to put up the $3 billion… This project… was done for all mankind…” – Franklin Foer (25:15)
    “It was not done in a fashion where there was any sensitivity… the next generation may think twice about wanting to work in the government…” – Eric Green (26:34)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “The work that [federal workers] did was invisible but critical. It kept the ground under my feet stable.” – Hana Rosen (01:10)
• “There is a myth among many people… that personnel are fungible… In reality… you’re providing more value… simply because you have more expertise and better judgment.” – Michael Feinberg (13:24)
• “Are we ever going to get it back?” – Paula Soldner (21:46)
• “No private startup is going to address esoteric diseases like you need the government to unlock that.” – Franklin Foer (25:53)
• “I worry that the next generation may think twice about wanting to work in the government.” – Eric Green (26:55)

---

Timestamps for Essential Segments

• 00:10–02:23: How federal technical work underpins everyday life (Ryan Hippensteel, geodesy)
• 02:23–03:36: Scope of federal workforce departures during the Trump administration
• 04:20–05:05: Franklin Foer discovers the breadth and interconnectedness of federal roles
• 06:59–09:59: Elizabeth Poole on children’s health and the loss of her position
• 11:18–16:37: Michael Feinberg, FBI, on the personal and systemic costs of losing expertise
• 17:37–19:15: Franklin Foer, context on the history and necessity of the civil service
• 19:15–21:46: Paula Soldner, food safety and irreplaceable experience
• 23:02–26:55: Eric Green, NIH, and the government’s role in scientific “moonshots” and public health

---

Tone and Language

• The episode is earnest, humanizing, and draws on the voices and experiences of those rarely in the spotlight. The language blends accessible explanations (e.g., geodesy/GPS) with raw emotional impact from the guests, and the tone veers from quietly celebratory to mournful.

---

Final Thoughts

“The Discarded” forces listeners to reconsider the invisible edifice supporting daily American life and the sweeping, sometimes irreparable effects of dismantling it. Through stories of former civil servants, the episode makes a compelling case for the passion, expertise, and mission-driven nature of government work—and the price we all pay when it is undervalued or lost.

Transcript

[Ryan Hippensteel]

I always tell people to kind of picture their cell phone and, like, navigating somewhere you've never been.

[Hana Rosen]

This is Ryan.

[Ryan Hippensteel]

My name is Ryan Hippensteel, and he's.

[Hana Rosen]

Explaining to me how the work that he and his colleagues do helps a person like me, who has no sense of direction, get around, or I should probably say he and his former colleagues.

[Ryan Hippensteel]

First your cell phone is using GPS technology, and then you have all these layers, right? It might be a layer of restaurants so you can, you know, find a new pizza joint. All of those layers need to be on top of each other in the right place for your car and your iPhone or whatever it might be to know what road it's on.

[Hana Rosen]

The Earth is not a perfect sphere. It turns out that it's constantly shifting in subtle ways.

[Ryan Hippensteel]

You have subsidence, you have uplift, you have the gravity field underneath the earth changing. You have oscillating poles. So we're all very blessed with modern technology that can navigate us around an extremely complex environment that's changing, not realizing that the work's never done because the Earth truly is changing.

[Hana Rosen]

Hippensteel's work was keeping up with all this complexity so that the maps would remain precise. It's a field called geodesy.

[Ryan Hippensteel]

Geodesy is kind of the size and shape of the Earth, right? It's the sciences behind the size and shape of the Earth and what changes the Earth is undergoing at all times.

[Hana Rosen]

Hippensteel did this work for the federal government.

[Ryan Hippensteel]

I was the field operations branch chief for the National Geodetic Survey before I.

[Hana Rosen]

Talked to HIBP and steel. I was not aware that my getting around depended on the work of the National Geodetic Survey. So do other way, more critical things, like precision farming, disaster relief, ships, knowing how deep or shallow the shoreline is in real time. Even Hippensteel says weapons firing accurately. The work that he and his colleagues did was invisible but critical. It kept the ground under my feet stable. I'm Hana Rosen. This is Radio Atlantic. And this week, one year since Donald Trump was reinaugurated. We're talking about the federal government workforce. That was.

[Franklin Foer]

President Trump is only ramping up his unprecedented push to effectively take a wrecking ball to the federal government, laying off thousands.

[Hana Rosen]

Last April, Hip and Steele accepted a voluntary resignation package. He joined a mass exodus of federal workers. In Trump's first year back, over 300,000Americans left the government.

[Michael Feinberg]

We're removing all of the unnecessary, incompetent and corrupt bureaucrats from the federal workforce.

[Hana Rosen]

Many forced out or fired they don't report for work. We're firing them.

[Michael Feinberg]

In other words, you have to go to office.

[Hana Rosen]

Pressured to unceremoniously leave an offer or a threat. This morning, millions of federal workers are.

[Elizabeth Poole]

Faced with a stay in their jobs.

[Hana Rosen]

With an uncertain future or leave the.

[Elizabeth Poole]

Government, leave their jobs with a buyout.

[Hana Rosen]

From the Trump administration. Careers ended in capricious, even cruel ways.

[Ryan Hippensteel]

The new threat from President Trump now suggesting that some of the 750,000 furloughed government workers told to stay home during this shutdown may not get paid for time lost.

[Franklin Foer]

The president said today, quote, some people really don't deserve to be taken care of.

[Hana Rosen]

Today, we're looking back at those careers to take stock of who and what we've lost.

[Franklin Foer]

I felt like I personally, let alone people I talked to out there, even in Washington, were struggling to wrap their minds around the enormity of what has happened to our government.

[Hana Rosen]

This is Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer.

[Franklin Foer]

And I felt like we needed to do something that was both intimate and that humanized the loss to government, but that also had some sense of scale, that captured the way in which there's no department, agency, national park that really has gone untouched. In the process of the Trump administration's effort to collapse large chunks of the.

[Hana Rosen]

American government, Frank spent months tapping into the network. He called one fired worker who led him to another worker who felt pressured to resign, and so on, until the bigger picture became clearer.

[Franklin Foer]

When I started to talk to these bureaucrats, I would find people who were doing things that I didn't even know existed. I had no idea. I've studied politics and policy in my entire life. I had no idea that the government did so many of these things and that they were kind of essential parts of an ecosystem, and that if you remove one of those things, it has rippling effects through the economy, through our science, through our health, through our national defense.

[Hana Rosen]

Frank's interviews are compiled in the February issue of the magazine. You'll hear some of their voices throughout the episode. You talked to how many people?

[Franklin Foer]

I lost count, but let's call it like, 75, 80.

[Hana Rosen]

Okay, so you talked to 75, 80 people. I'm sure there are themes that emerged.

[Franklin Foer]

There were so many people who took on government service because they had either been veterans themselves or they had grown up in military families, or they'd grown up in families where government service was some sort of a tradition. And, you know, we think of the military as totally divorced from the civilian part of government. But I think that there's a lot of the ethos that's, you know, not quite the same, but the same spirit, the level of satisfaction that I think government workers experience is different than most careers. You think of government bureaucrats as being so gray. But what I experienced as I talked to these people were people who couldn't wait to go into the office in the morning, and people who generally thought that they were doing something transcendently important. Now, there's a downside to that, right? You know, if you have all of this power and you consider yourself on this profound mission, you can become arrogant, you can become abusive. But these were people who loved their jobs.

[Hana Rosen]

So that's not a cliche.

[Franklin Foer]

That's not a cliche. And I think that that explains a lot of the hurt that they felt when they were kicked to the curb in such an undignified sort of way. Now, I admit this all sounds kind of gauzy and as I'm presenting it, but I think that the gauziness of it was kind of part of the surprise for me in the course of doing this that I felt like I would be meeting people who were more bitter. And I was very self conscious about saying, we're gonna talk about the end at the end of this conversation. But really most of the conversation is about what you did. I want to hear about your job. And I think that there was something almost cathartic for a lot of the people to be able to kind of get past the sad part of the story and to talk about the thing that they were most enthusiastic about.

[Elizabeth Poole]

I actually think that there's nothing more patriotic that you can do but to work in public service, whether that's truly. I thought I was gonna retire from this job. I thought this was it. I'd found the thing I was gonna do forever.

[Hana Rosen]

This is Elizabeth Poole, one of the people Frank spoke with.

[Elizabeth Poole]

I worked for the U.S. environmental Protection Agency in Region 5. That's the Chicago office, the Great Lakes office. And my job was the Children's Environmental Health Coordinator. I helped people, not just at the agency, but our partners across the six states we served, figure out ways to make better decisions on behalf of children. I'm from Kentucky, grew up in Kentucky, and so I've spent a lot of time in coal country. And so seeing the devastation that coal mining can do on Appalachia, that sort of drove me into wanting to work in the environmental field. The children's health role was absolutely my dream job. As soon as I found out it even existed at epa, it was something I knew I wanted to do. We got to help families make better decisions, to keep a healthier home. We got to help schools reduce exposures. We got to do really amazing things to help children. They experience environmental exposures differently, both from a physiological standpoint, but also a behavioral standpoint. And so we need to make sure that we're being as protective as possible to vulnerable populations.

[Hana Rosen]

In early 2025, Milwaukee discovered that lead paint had poisoned at least four students in its public schools. Poole was ready to descend with tests and guidance, but the Trump administration forbade her team from working on the crisis, an allegation that the EPA disputes. In March, she resigned.

[Elizabeth Poole]

So it truly was my dream job. I had no plans on leaving until the change in administration, when I just knew they weren't going to let us do it the right way. They weren't going to let us really protect children in a meaningful, scientifically sound way. We could see the writing on the wall coming from miles away. So my position was not backfilled. I don't know if it ever will be backfilled. I try not to talk to my former colleagues about what's going on, because I can't imagine how stressful it is for them. You know, Russell Voight said he wanted to traumatize the federal workforce. They're also being traumatized on a daily basis.

[Franklin Foer]

Part of, I think, our cultural inclination as Americans, kind of the innate libertarianism that's baked into all of us and the fact that we've had kind of distrust of government and the sense of its inefficiency hammered into us for so long, we're not inclined to think of bureaucrats charitably. But when you actually think about what they do and you learn about their jobs, you see that it's not just an academic exercise. It's not just a bunch of paper pushers. That there was a reason that Congress decided to create these jobs, that there was some good, some essential service that they were providing.

[Hana Rosen]

So think back to when you started the project. What did you expect going into it?

[Franklin Foer]

I wanted to get a portrait of the government in its entirety across hierarchies. But I did it. I entered in a way where I was pretty confident. I was like, I am a native Washingtonian. I've grown up in the city. I've grown up around bureaucrats. I feel like I've written about politics for my entire adult career. I felt like I knew what the US Government was, and I actually was pretty surprised over the course of doing this. There were parts of the government that I didn't know existed.

[Hana Rosen]

So what surprised you Going through this.

[Franklin Foer]

You know, I didn't understand the way in which the government was constantly making investments in human capital. You can't walk in off the street and know how to do a lot of government jobs because they're esoteric or they're filling a void. And so the government has all of these improvised processes for helping people get better at what they do. And so as I was thinking about this, I was like, this simple fact kind of dawned on me that when you're pushing somebody out of the government or you're firing them or you're forcing them to retire, you're not just losing an expert, you're losing all this investment that the taxpayer had made in the development of that expertise.

[Michael Feinberg]

The government invested an immense amount of human capital in terms of getting me to the point where I was when I was forced out.

[Hana Rosen]

This is Michael Feinberg. He worked at the FBI for 16 years.

[Michael Feinberg]

My job for the entirety of my career was to figure out who in the United States was spying on behalf of the People's Republic of China and then figure out ways to either stop them from doing it and arresting them and prosecuting them, or more ideally, actually recruiting them to covertly work for the US Government while they were still ostensibly in the service of the Chinese.

[Hana Rosen]

Feinberg decided to be an FBI agent after he was at his grandfather's 90th birthday and he overheard him talking to his younger brother.

[Michael Feinberg]

They were discussing how they enlisted in the military almost immediately after Pearl Harbor. And it caused me to reflect that 911 had not really changed my career path at all. And in all candor, I felt a little bit ashamed that I, who had many more advantages than they ever did growing up, did nothing to help the country that made that possible, while they immediately answered a call to service. So shortly after overhearing that conversation, I applied to the FBI.

[Hana Rosen]

Feinberg joined the FBI, and his career was a perfect example of what Frank discovered about the investment in human capital.

[Michael Feinberg]

The mere application process takes 12 to 24 months.

[Hana Rosen]

Legal training, lessons on how to interrogate.

[Michael Feinberg]

People, hand to hand combat, and firearms and tactics. The Bureau sent me to summers of immersion training in Mandarin.

[Hana Rosen]

He went from speaking not a word of the language to being able to conduct interviews and interrogations.

[Michael Feinberg]

There is a myth among many people who have not worked for the intelligence community or law enforcement agencies before that personnel are fungible, that you can easily force somebody out of retirement age and just have them replaced by a new recruit. In reality, every year that somebody spends in the community, they are providing more value than they did the year beforehand simply because they have more expertise and better judgment. It's not just a question of the millions of dollars that the government spends training us. It is more importantly a question of what we learn over time that cannot be taught through any manner other than experience.

[Hana Rosen]

For the government, the investments in Feinberg were paying off. He was on a path to become the FBI's top Chinese counterintelligence investigator. He'd already worked on high profile cases. The biggest one, which you might have heard of, was against the Chinese telecom company Huawei.

[Michael Feinberg]

One of the real ironies of how my career ended. I was forced out by the second Trump administration when the Huawei indictments were one of their signal accomplishments against the Chinese government during the first Trump administration.

[Hana Rosen]

The end for Feinberg came on May 31. In a way, that's become a pattern for this administration, a loyalty test.

[Michael Feinberg]

I received a phone call from my special agent in charge that Dan Bongino had discovered I was friends with Pete Strzok, who was a former FBI official who gained some notoriety for his criticisms of Trump. And it was made clear to me that my career was over. I would not be getting a promotion for which I was being considered. I would, in fact, be getting demoted. And at the very least, I would be investigated over the nature of my friendship. Not wanting to put my family through the inevitable hell that all that would entail, I made a decision in about 12 hours that the best thing to do was leave of my own accord and walk away with my dignity and not give them the satisfaction of ruining my life. Even now, remembering leaving the FBI has been the defining heartbreak of my life. I loved being of use to my community and country. And I'm forced to re reconcile myself to the fact that that's something I'm not allowed to do anymore. For a public servant who has not just dedicated their life, but often risked that life on behalf of his fellow Americans, to have that privilege ripped from him for a petty and political reason is, at times, frankly, too much to bear.

[Hana Rosen]

After the break, we talked to two more federal workers. One reminds us of why the civil service existed in the first place, and the other of the civil service in its heyday.

[John F. Kennedy]

We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.

[Hana Rosen]

That's after the break.

[Experian Advertiser]

My dad taught me a lot, including how easy it is to forget to cancel things. So I downloaded Experian, my bff, Big Financial Friend. Experian could help me cancel my unused subscriptions and lower my bills so saving me hundreds a year. Get started with the Experian app today. Your big financial friends here to help you save smarter. Results will vary. Not all bills are subscriptions eligible. Savings not guaranteed $631 a year average savings with one plus negotiations and one plus cancellations paid. Membership with connected payment account required. See experian.com for details.

[Paula Soldner]

Experian.

[Hana Rosen]

After the Civil War, the federal government's footprint expanded and the civil service began to change. Some of that was thanks to universities. They were shifting from being more or less finishing schools for aristocrats to places that produced scientists, engineers and other professionals. And this expertise made its way to.

[Franklin Foer]

D.C. we stop hiring friends of the party in power to do the work of government, and we start seeking out people who are actually equipped to do these problems. We get rid of the patronage system and the civil service starts to grow and it starts to hire all these experts, whether they are economists or lawyers or scientists. And they start to do these things that make American life less harmful. They start to make sure that drugs aren't toxic, that we're actually measuring things in an accurate sort of way so we can make good predictions about the weather or about the future of the labor market. And all of these things help America expand as a country and help us become an economic power. We don't think of the government as a pillar of our national strength, but we were only able to break through in this sort of way that we broke through as a country in the 20th century because we had a government that had capacity and that people trusted. The world likes to deposit its money in the American banking system because they trust the people who regulate that banking system.

[Paula Soldner]

My name is Paula Soldner. I became a federal employee in 1987 and was that till September 30th of 2025.

[Hana Rosen]

Soldner exemplifies the federal government in its most elemental form. She spent years regulating products that Americans use and consume every day.

[Paula Soldner]

I was a food inspector and consumer safety inspector. We inspected the meat and poultry products that you'll see in the grocery store. I am also the national Joint Council chairwoman for the union afge. Presently, even though I am retired from the federal sector, I worked in Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin.

[Hana Rosen]

When you think of regulations, you think of someone behind a desk in D.C. but that is the wrong image for Soldner and her work.

[Paula Soldner]

An inspector has to have a very strong tolerance for blood. You've got to be able to have that strong stomach to endure the blood, to endure the guts, all those internal organs that you know, surgeons on a daily basis see whether it is a hot dog, whether it is a bratwurst, whether it's a summer sausage. The gamut of what happens on a week could go from slaughtering to deboning the animal, to watching all the processes to get to that final finished product. And that's where having the knowledge of somebody getting trained that has been around for years, that's lost. It's completely lost. The other experiences of what we as the veteran inspectors did is long gone. You can be as book smart as you want to be until you step into the reality, onto that slaughter floor.

[Hana Rosen]

In April, Paula accepted the Trump administration's offer of early retirement. Many of her colleagues did the same.

[Paula Soldner]

I dread the long term effects when there is life that is lost because of food safety issues that are not getting corrected. I think losing the experience and the training of these inspectors out there is so critical. And now that it is lost, are we ever going to get it back?

[Hana Rosen]

Frank, you talked about the early evolution of the federal workforce after the Civil War. Turning away from the patronage system, hiring experts, regulating drugs, and keeping things safe. So that was the beginning of the modern federal government. What was its heyday like? What was the peak of its growth?

[Franklin Foer]

I think that it really starts in the earliest decades of the 20th century where these concepts are starting to get embedded. And then of course, it kind of explodes ultimately during the, the wars that we fight and especially World War II, and then the aftermath of World War II, when we had the Cold War and the extension of a lot of government.

[John F. Kennedy]

We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills. Because that challenge is one that we're willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone and one we intend to win.

[Hana Rosen]

When people think of the federal government at its most ambitious, they often think of the Apollo program.

[Eric Green]

I remember as a child watching everything unfold on a black and white television. It was pretty incredible.

[Hana Rosen]

This is Eric Green.

[Eric Green]

I am a physician scientist who worked at the National Human Genome Research institute at the US National Institutes of Health for 31 years and even served as the director of the Institute for the last 15 years I was there.

[Hana Rosen]

Greene's work is often referred to as the Human Genome Project.

[Eric Green]

It's sort of biology's equivalent of the moon shot. Instead of putting a person on a moon, what the Human Genome Project did was to read out for the very first time the exact order of the building blocks. And there's 3 billion such building blocks in all human DNA. When I get competitive with the moonshot, I sometimes point out that the goal of the Apollo mission and the moonshot was to put a person on the moon. And that's now been repeated a handful of times. Not in the dozens, but a handful of times. We've put a person back on the mountain moon. The goal, the signature goal of the Human Genome project was to read out all the letters in the human genome. That has now been repeated millions and millions of times.

[Hana Rosen]

The project's version of the moon landing happened in April 2003, with the first nearly complete sequence declared finished.

[Eric Green]

When the genome project ended, our institute pivoted to begin to use genomics as part of medicine, basically using genomic information about individual patients to improve their medical management. Genomics has just infused its way into all areas of life sciences. I mean, everything from agriculture to ecology to evolutionary studies. And, you know, 22 years ago, there was minimal that we could do in terms of getting insights about a patient's DNA. And now it's routine, whether it's prenatal screening to look for chromosomal and DNA abnormalities in unborn children or in cancer, which is a disease of the genome. The way we deal with cancer now is completely different because of genomics or with rare genetic diseases. And I just want to stress that it's just the earliest days. The return on investment for the genome project was phenomenal, and I think it continues to be leveraged even up to the present time.

[Franklin Foer]

There was no private equity venture capital firm in the world that was ever going to put up the $3 billion that was required to do this project that involved cooperation around the world, that was coordinated by the United States, but that involved scientists everywhere. In this project that was done for all all mankind, to use the NASA phrase. And that has all sorts of implications that also require government to open up, to take this $3 billion thing and then to turn it into something that's actually the everyday patient has the ability to access, to understand the tumor in their body or to understand the rare disease that their toddler has been afflicted with and to design therapies that could actually treat these esoteric diseases. That is something only government could do. No private startup is going to address esoteric diseases like you need the government to unlock that.

[Hana Rosen]

On March 17, the Trump administration forced Green from his job. The first of five NIH Institute directors it removed. A Health and Human Services official told the Atlantic that, quote, under a new administration, we have the right to remove individuals who do not align with the agency's priorities.

[Eric Green]

You know, I think of the physicians, I think of the PhD scientists, I think of the other, you know, the technicians, the computer scientists. I mean, we did this. And my staff who's still there, continue to do this because they really believe in the mission. They believe in public service. But they also now have been traumatized by the destructive forces that they've witnessed. I worry about when it comes time to rebuild the NIH or to rebuild the government, will people think twice that it is worth the risk? Because the way people were laid off was not kind and gentle. It was pretty brutal. And it was not done in a fashion where there was any sensitivity associated with it. In fact, I would describe and I worry that the next generation may think twice about wanting to work in the government for fearful that an administration could come in and be as destructive as this one has been.

[Hana Rosen]

To hear from more federal workers, check out Frank's article online. It's called the Purged. He talks to civil servants who worked on disaster relief, humanitarian aid at the irs, the Centers for Disease Control. So much knowledge and so much experience lost. This episode of Radio Atlantic was produced by Kevin Townsend and Rosie Hughes. It was edited by Claudina Baid and fact checked by Genevieve Finn. Rob Smirciak engineered and composed original music. Claudina Baid is the executive producer of audio at the Atlantic and Andrea Valdez is our managing editor. Listeners, if you enjoy the show, you can support our work and the work of all Atlantic journalists when you subscribe to the [e-mail] listener I'm Hanna Rosen. Thank you for listening.

[Michael Feinberg]

Sam.