Loading summary
Carla Lally
Carla I'm Carla Lally, cookbook author and snack enthusiast. Do you have a sweet tooth? Check out Sweets Unwrapped, a podcast from Ferrero and Atlantic Rethink, the Atlantic's creative marketing studio. Together, we're celebrating the traditions that make life sweet. Tune in now.
Home Depot Announcer
Heat up your Fourth of July at the Home Depot with our wide variety of grills under $300 and make every gathering one to remember. Give your outdoor space a glow up, whatever your budget is with savings on seasonal plan starting at $5. With the grill fired up and your backyard set to perfection, you'll be able to invite friends and family over to kick off the party. Start celebrating with low prices guaranteed at the Home Depot. Prices may vary by store exclusions apply. Seehomedebo.com pricematch for details.
David Graham
I've often treated that as a kind of skeleton key to understanding Trump's approach to things. He sees the splashy announcement as what matters. So it's a splash announcement to say, you're going to fix the reflecting pool and you're going to have it looking great by the 4th of July for the 250th celebration. It's great to say you're going to go into Iran. You're going to, you know, topple the regime and bring democracy. Those announcements are easy and fun, and they have a tend to have a political payoff. But the political payoff decays over time.
Adam Harris
The reflecting pool in front of the Lincoln memorial in Washington, D.C. holds a special place in American history. It's a symbol of national pride. It was built a century ago to connect the National Mall, the space between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, and it was dedicated in 1922. It was where the crowds gathered as Martin Luther King delivered his I have a Dream speech during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom in 1963.
Martin Luther King Jr.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. I have a dream today, and it's
Adam Harris
been in iconic films. It's where Forrest Gump, wearing his dress uniform, reconnects with Jenny, depicting the day in October of 1967 when thousands of Vietnam War protesters gathered for the march on the Pentagon. But when the pool recently turned green as a result of algae blooms and its just finished paint job began to peel away, the reflecting pool became a symbol of something else. I'm Adam Harris and this is Radio Atlantic. This week, we need to think about the President's mission to leave his mark on the nation's capital. Now, the Reflecting Pool is just one of several projects President Trump has launched since returning to office. Some have been to beautify the city in the lead up to the nation's 250th anniversary. But others, including tearing down the East Wing to build a ballroom or. Or his plan to construct an arch at the city's limits, are an attempt to cement his legacy long after his term in office is over. What does the president gain by trying to remake Washington? And what, if anything, do we as Americans stand to gain or to lose? Joining me to discuss all of this is my colleague, Atlantic staff writer David Graham. Let's get to questions. So, David, why are people so glued to this reflecting Pool drama?
David Graham
I think there's, I mean, there's a lot of factors, but I think there's a couple, maybe three. One is a little bit like the East Wing demolition. It's just, it's really like a really physical demonstration of something. So you can talk about corruption, you can talk about power grabs, you can talk about all these things, and they're kind of abstract, but the reflecting pool is there, or conversely, the East Wing is not there anymore. The second thing is that he just made this a story on his own, you know, like, this was not, no one was talking about the reflecting pool before he started making a big deal about it a few weeks ago. And then the third thing, the reflecting pool really was green, although it seems like it may now be turning back blue. And experts are warning that it could vary some over time here, I guess,
Adam Harris
at its root, though, right, like the reflecting pool, the demolition of the East Wing to try to build a ballroom, all of these things are, if you allow Trump to tell it right, attempts to beautify the city of D.C. but when you look at the polls, it shows that, like, few Americans are supporting the changes that he's making here. What is it about the specific changes? Right? Like if, if the attempt is to beautify the city, what is it about the specific changes that people don't seem to like?
David Graham
You know, I want to believe that a lot of it is about process. And that's hard to believe because usually I don't feel like Americans care a lot about process like political reporters do, but it's, you know, it's sort of irrelevant. But I think the way that he does these things without permission, without seeking funding, and of course, that's true elsewhere. See the Iran war, for example, I think does great on people. But the other problem is he does it poorly? Like if Trump were doing these things and it was working really well, I think maybe it would be a different story. But if you say you're going to fix the reflecting pool and you spend $16 million on it and it immediately falls apart, that's going to blow back on you. If you say you're going to erect a giant arch and it looks really bad, people are going to see it looks really bad. Whereas if you build something beautiful without asking permission, I think people are likely to be more forgiving.
Adam Harris
Yeah, that's fair. And you think about construction projects, they often fail or they're going to need repairs over time. It's not that this is something where thinking about it in the context of your house, somebody comes to repair your sump pump, and two weeks later your sump pump breaks. I'm not speaking from personal experience here, I promise. But these construction projects, they're more than a dozen at this point. They're gonna cost at least a billion dollars, according to the New York Times analysis that recently came out. And that's only accounting for the projections that we can track. What purpose does remaking DC Serve for the president?
David Graham
You know, he has such a self image as a builder and a self created image as a builder, and I think he wants to, you know, he wants to show that he wants to be the builder that he claimed to be in real estate. I do buy into the idea that he's more obsessed with legacy than he was in his first term. There's all these things that are meant to be sort of big swings and are left. Meant to leave, you know, have a lasting legacy. But the problem is you have to do things well. And that has always been a challenge for Trump. He has never lacked for ideas, you know, throughout his career in, in business, but he has not always followed through very effectively. And I think that's part of the problem here. And, you know, he rages against process and he rages against procedures, but some of those things. And look, you know, government has a lot of red tape. No one would disagree with that. But sometimes that red tape has a purpose and it is to make sure that you have the best contractor doing it and not some rando who might have donated to your campaign. And you have the right process and you've thought through it. If you look at the Kennedy center, it's clear they just didn't think about what they were doing. They, they wanted to take over the Kennedy Center. They didn't like the way it was going, but they didn't really Think about, okay, what's the next step after we seize control? And so I think that causes problems, too, just sort of the lack of planning. And you know that that's very much the case with the reflecting pool. You can say the reflecting pool was full of algae and could have looked better.
Adam Harris
Fair enough.
David Graham
But, like, do you actually have a plan to fix that, or you just have a plan to say you're going to fix it?
Adam Harris
Yeah, the, the idea that, that planning. I've been thinking about that a lot as well, too.
Martin Luther King Jr.
Right.
Adam Harris
You think about the fact that it's summer when algae blooms start up. One of our colleagues talked to ecologists who were like, well, if you have a dark background to a pool, this is a darker color shade of blue, and you do it in the spring, you should be doing it in the fall or winter. You're going to get these algae blooms. This is something you could have foreseen. I also think about that in the context of war gaming Iran saying that, well, they have the opportunity to close the Strait of Hormuz, and now that is a permanent option that's on the table for Iran. So, I guess, what does this say about the president's M.O. right, his way of doing things?
David Graham
I go back a lot to the first impeachment in the first term, and Trump was withholding money from Ukraine that Congress had appropriated, and that was the basis for the impeachment. But what he wanted from Ukraine was that they would announce an investigation into Hunter Biden. And crucially, it was not. It became very clear in the impeachment hearings and, you know, in the hearings in Congress and in testimony that Trump didn't actually care about how the investigation was executed. He wanted an announcement because he saw that as the politically useful thing. And that, to me, I've often treated that as a kind of skeleton key to understanding Trump's approach to things. He sees the splashy announcement as what matters. So it's a splashy announcement to say, you're going to fix the reflecting pool, and you're going to have it looking great by the 4th of July for the 250th celebration. It's great to say you're going to go into Iran, you're going to, you know, topple the regime and bring democracy. Those announcements are easy and fun, and they tend to have a political payoff, but the political payoff decays over time. And in the case of the reflecting pool or Iran, I think the decay has been faster than Trump is prepared for or expects or sort of has a plan to deal with.
Adam Harris
When we come back, how the President is changing more than the physical appearance of the nation's capital and what that means for our politics.
RPI Student
To pursue music seriously, I had to craft my own way. I make my own musical instruments from scratch. I kind of start to riff with various materials that are on my disposal. RPI gave me the time and space to really focus on my voice. Being exposed to very multidisciplinary program colleagues and faculties helped me broaden my view on this relationship between technology and art.
David Graham
Learn more at rpi.edu Barraisers this episode
Google Chrome Announcer
is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block. Or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability various 18.
Adam Harris
Welcome back. I'm thinking about the construction projects and I'm also thinking about the things that aren't as physical in dc, Right. You talked about his legacy, trying to quite literally cement his legacy, build an art and things of the sort. But how should we be thinking about the ways that he has also changed our political institutions? Right, in ways that may be intractable at this point?
David Graham
Yeah. I mean, when you talk about his M.O. and we're talking about it with these physical things, it's not like the MO is significantly different in other places. And so when you see Trump, for example, sidelining Congress, you know, taking control of the independent regulatory agencies, so the sort of Alphabet soup, fec, FCC and LRB kind of stuff, I think it's working in much the same way. It's just not as visible. But you, you know, Trump has upended 90 years of precedent about these independent agencies. Maybe people will like the way that they're operating in the new system, but I don't think so. And you know, I would look at the FCC as an example where you have Ted Cruz being one of the most prominent critics of the way Brandon Carr, Trump's hand picked FCC chairman, is running things. If you don't like Brandon Carr and his approach, you're not going to like the way that looks when the president controls all of those agencies, which is what seems likely. But putting them back is going to be really hard to do and there's not a lot of thought about how to do that. And I think the repair is going to take a long time. I don't know how long it will take to fix the reflecting pool. It sounds like from contractors we're talking about, you know, well past July 4th. I don't know how long it will take to fix the Kennedy center, which is a sort of less mechanical fix. But it's kind of. They've taken it over, they've broken it now. The audiences have been driven away, the artists have been driven away. A judge says they have to remain open, but it's not clear what they'll actually do if they remain open, like what the shows are going to be. And so I think, you know, there's a lot of these issues that a lot of this mo creates, issues that are deeper, harder to see and harder and longer to fix than a, you know, an eyesore on them all.
Adam Harris
So every administration spends things, but this administration seems to try to spend things that we can see are untrue with our own eyes. Right. Things from winning the war with Iran. Winning the war with Iran, to the green water and the reflecting pool. So are Americans, Republicans in particular, and congressional Republicans, if I'm being really specific, turning a corner and starting to call Trump on these instances?
David Graham
First, I'd say your point about spin is interesting. I think that's useful. And it made me think, like, what are the differences with other administrations? Every administration spins, but Trump seems to treat it as the spin is the end point rather than a way to sell something. There often isn't anything under it. It's all on the, you know, on the surface. Is Congress turning a corner? It's so hard to know. It kind of goes in fits and starts. It does seem like having somebody like Bill Cassidy, who got into a shouting match with Trump behind closed doors on Wednesday, apparently, or Thom Tillis, who is spitting great quote left and right to reporters on the Hill, or even John Cornyn. Nobody's idea of a, you know, rogue actor. You know, you see pushing people, pushing back on these things. I want to see how far that goes. You know, Trump is making another push for the Save America Act. It doesn't seem like that's going to work.
Adam Harris
Can you actually just remind people what the Save America act is?
David Graham
Yeah. This is the big bill that Trump and a few Republican allies have been pushing, and it would do a bunch of things to change election administration. But the biggest and most famous one is it would require proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. But what we've seen in the past is that when Trump tries enough times, eventually the Senate gives in. It would be remarkable for senators this time to hold the line. And it seems possible, but I wouldn't rely on it, given the history.
Adam Harris
Yeah, actually, can you talk a little bit about that history of, like, places where Republicans have pushed back and then it's sustaining that pushback, sustaining that diligence that sort of decides whether or not the President is able to do the things that he would like to do.
David Graham
Yeah, I mean, you know, you can go back to the, the primary in 2016 where nobody in the party wanted Trump to be the nominee, and then they acquiesced, and then they seemed like they were going to push him out after the excess Hollywood tape. And then they came back and that pattern has just gone back and forth. I mean, you see it to some extent on the Epstein files where a couple Republicans broke ranks, but not many. You see it on some of these votes on the Iran war. There's just a, you know, they, I think what you have, what happens is these members of Congress see something happen and they realize that it is bad. They are personally offended by it, or they personally think it's bad. But then over time, Trump is able to kind of marshal his media machine and, and his megaphone and they get a little bit nervous and they back off. You know, there are signs that, that is splintering when you see somebody like Tucker Carlson breaking with the president so fiercely. And, you know, I've written, I don't think Carlson deserves any credit, but I think it's, you know, it's notable to see that maybe Trump has a little bit less power. And also maybe with the midterms coming, Republicans are thinking, well, I, I don't want the President yelling at me. But on the other hand, I've already gotten through my primary and what I really don't want to do is lose my seat. This guy's unpopular doing unpopular things. Maybe this is the time to break free from him, at least for a little bit.
Adam Harris
So we are coming up on the 250th anniversary. We're coming up on July 4th. What are you going to be watching for as we move through this week of 250 celebrations, events leading up to the Fourth of July.
David Graham
It feels like, to choose a kind of World cup metaphor, Trump is in a real own goal space right now. There's a housing bill that Republicans think will be useful for Republicans in the midterms. He announces he's not going to sign it. He tries to jawbone them again on the Save America Act. And I think some of this is he's really angry that they voted on the Iran war to limit his powers. I think some of this is Trump realizes that Congress is very unpopular and he's sort of trying to push back against them as a way of bolstering his own popularity. But I think a lot of it is just he, he's kind of in a, he's in a mood and he keeps doing things that seem to me to be self defeating. And, and so I want to see where that goes, whether he continues that or if they're kind of compartmentalized in his, you know, his, his rally on Wednesday night. He didn't really talk about those things. That's maybe unusual message discipline from him. But I don't, I wouldn't say that there's a plan because there's often not a plan. But I'm curious to see how he kind of gets out of this.
RPI Student
Yeah.
Adam Harris
You know, it's actually interesting, too, that it's, as we're moving towards this, like, national anniversary, we're thinking so much about this one, this one man. Right. As opposed to like the ideals that are underpinning it, which is, seems to also be a sort of feature of.
David Graham
Yeah, he loves that. He must be very pleased about that.
Adam Harris
David, thank you so much for joining me.
David Graham
My pleasure.
Adam Harris
That's all for today's show. This episode of Radio Atlantic was produced by Mike Pasoli and Hadley Robinson. It was engineered by Dave Grine. Our music is by Rob Smerziak. Claudina Baid is the executive producer of Atlantic Audio, and Andrea Valdez is our managing editor. If you like what you saw here, new episodes of Radio Atlantic drop every Monday and Thursday. You can subscribe on the Atlantic's YouTube page on Apple or Spotify or wherever it is you get your podcasts. And if you want to support this work and the work of my colleagues, you can subscribe to the Atlantic@theAtlantic.com until next time, I'm Adam Harris.
NPress Announcer
If you're trying to get news today, you'll find a lot of biased algorithms, rage bait and AI noise. Thanks. Social media. That's where nPress comes in. It's a social platform on top of factual journalism, not the other way around. Track your reading and earn points. It's like Strava for your brain. Plus, you can connect with other users in your city who share your genuine curiosity. Ditch the echo chamber for reality with NPress. Download it today for iOS or Android at NPress app. That's I n as in news nerd press.
Date: June 29, 2026
Host: Adam Harris
Guest: David Graham, staff writer at The Atlantic
This episode examines President Trump’s highly visible campaign to reshape Washington, D.C.—from splashy construction projects on national monuments like the Reflecting Pool to controversial demolitions and attempts to cement his legacy in the lead-up to America’s 250th anniversary. Host Adam Harris and The Atlantic’s David Graham go beyond the physical changes, exploring what these moves reveal about Trump’s governing style, the realities of legacy-building, and their enduring effects on political institutions and American democracy. The discussion highlights a moment in which spectacle, process, and spin collide—and asks what’s really gained (or lost) in the battle over Washington's appearance and meaning.
[00:52 – 03:25]
[03:25 – 04:20]
[04:52 – 08:13]
[08:13 – 09:03]
[09:03 – 10:16]
[11:25 – 13:42]
[13:42 – 15:03]
[15:03 – 15:48]
[15:48 – 17:11]
[17:11 – 18:47]
The conversation is sharp, analytical, and at times wryly critical, combining historical perspective with urgent commentary on contemporary politics. Both Harris and Graham pepper the episode with clear, candid observations, never straying into overwrought alarmism but maintaining a sense of concern for democratic process and legacy.
"Trump’s Battle for Washington" deftly argues that the pursuit of spectacle over substance—whether it’s with gleaming public works or constitutional guardrails—marks the Trump era’s most lasting imprint on the capital, and possibly on America itself. The episode leaves listeners questioning not just what will remain of Washington’s monuments and institutions after this presidency, but what kind of legacy—designed or accidental—will define the nation at its 250th birthday and beyond.