← Radiolab
Radiolab
The Unpopular Vote
00:59:46
The closest we ever came to abolishing the electoral college and why we probably never will.As the US Presidential Election nears, Radiolab covers the closest we ever came to abolishing the Electoral College. In the 1960s, then-President Lyndon Johnson approached an ambitious young Senator known as the Kennedy of the Midwest to tweak the way Americans elect their President. The more Senator Birch Bayh looked into the electoral college the more he believed it was a ticking time bomb hidden in the constitution, that someone needed to defuse. With overwhelming support in Congress, the endorsement of multiple Presidents, and polling showing that over 80% of the American public supported abolishing it, it looked like he might just pull it off. So why do we still have the electoral college? And will we actually ever get rid of it? This episode was reported by Latif Nasser and Matt Kielty and was Produced by Matt Kielty and Simon Adler. Original music and sound design contributed by Mat...
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:01]
Latif Nasser
Radiolab is supported by Dell Shop. Dell Technologies Black Friday event for their lowest prices of the year. The Future is on sale today with limited time deals on select PCs like the XPS 16 that accelerate AI with Intel Core Ultra processors. Black Friday is their biggest sale of the year and the best time to upgrade. But it's only here for a limited time. Shop now@dell.com deals that's Dell.com Radiolab is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash? Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies. Try it@progressive.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states. Listeners support it. WNYC studios. Oh, wait, you're listening. Okay. All right. Okay. All right. You're listening to Radio Lab. Radio Lab from wny. See? Hey, I'm ready to go. Let's go. This is Radiolab. I'm Latif Nasser. Good. And I'm Annie McEwen. I'm gonna be in the thing. I'm gonna be at the top. Yeah, sure, why not? And I'm Annie McEwan. And you might be wondering why you're here. Annie McEwan. I thought this was the bathroom. What am I doing here? Well, I needed help. I needed a companion for this story. Okay. Lulu's out. Lulu's out. Still on maternity leave. And I wanted you here for this story because you and I, we are both Canadians. And I want to do a story that is not about Canada, but about something essential to this country, the United States. And I just thought there's a value to you and I not being from here in this foreign land like we're aliens staring out of the cockpit of our UFOs at the new land in front of us and observing. We're anthropologists. Yeah, we're very polite anthropologists. Okay. And so if we could, I would like for us to turn our Canadian eyes to the US Presidential election. This election is close. Everyone knows that. And so. Well. So maybe my first question is just what do you think about when you think about an American election? The circus. Pamela. Harriet. The carnival. So put on Pavarotti singing Ave Maria nice and loud. It's sort of a grotesque carnaval type thing. That is just so confusing. I'm just, like, in awe of how complicated it is. Yeah, that's the thing. When I first got here, the way this country picked president felt to me like, here, we've got our Reds, we've got our blues, a giant, We've got our toss ups Rube Goldberg machine with all kinds of, you know, it's like, take a look at this. This is her big blue firewall. If Pennsylvania goes blue, eight doors open up, slip back the blue wall and a marble hits Michigan and a mousetrap falls on Wisconsin. So that's your clearest path to victory, but she's got several paths. Or how about say Harris loses Georgia? Well, guess what? Look out for North Carolina. You come over now to the sun belt battleground states, which means then you really need to pay attention to Nevada and Arizona. Well, those are very, very swingy states that are very much in play for both campaign. It's sort of just like how, like one of, if not the most important election in the world. How is this the system, like just the system seems so arbitrary and confused. It's always seemed so arbitrary and confusing until I heard this story. Oh, this story for me felt like it explained so much about how Americans pick their president and why, but also that it didn't necessarily have to be this way. And there was a moment, there was one moment, not like much more recent than I expected. There was one moment where it all could have been a lot simpler. And it almost was a lot simpler. Hello. Hey. Hi, how are you? And it's a story I first heard. Good. How are you? I'm good, I'm good. Sorry, we're a little, as usual, slightly frantic here from my friend and mentor, Harvard historian Jill Lepore. So the story starts with a guy, and I kind of love this guy Birch. Bye. And I especially love him because of his jingle. Hey, look him over. He's my kind of guy. His first name is Bert, his last name is Spy. He was a US Senator from Indiana, our Hoosier state. Like a very wholesome looking, kind of corn fed guy, very handsome, charming, dimples, blue eyed young guy, like a John F. Kennedy manque, as they would say. He literally gets called the Kennedy of the Midwest. Please join me in a warm welcome for the Democratic senator from Indiana, Birch Vibe. And thank you very much. He was very ambitious. I think we have a responsibility to see very, very ambitious that this country is today and will be for future generations what Abraham Lincoln described as the one last best hope. It's a rather significant responsibility. It's ours, yours and mine, and I hope we don't shirk it. So he's elected to the Senate in 1962, takes office in 1963, and when he gets there, he's one of the youngest members of the Senate. He's still wet behind the ears. Yeah. He's 34 years old, so. Burch died in 2019, but we were able to talk to two of his former staffers. I'm Jay Berman. At one point, I was legislative assistant to Senator Burch by. Of Indiana. At another point, I was the chief of staff, and my name is Bob Blaymire. I spent. Spent the first 13 years of my adult life, starting as a freshman in college, working for Senator Birch Bayh. So a couple things to know about Birch. One, Birch had an ice cream addiction. He loved ice cream, which was bane in my existence for many years long. Why wait? Why? Because you're always on a tight schedule. And he was here, Dairy Queen, and we had to go there. He carried a spoon in his briefcase. Seriously. Then the other thing, which we already mentioned, he was really ambitious, but he was a problem solver. He would see something that needed to be fixed and go after it. And when he gets to the Senate in 1963, he immediately has a problem. I mean, it's a kind of petty, personal problem. But he is put on the Judiciary Committee because he'd gone to law school. But as a junior member, he doesn't get to chair a subcommittee, which sounds like, who cares? That's very boring. But is that what people want? Yeah, because that's how you actually get a little slice of power in Congress and how you can actually do things. Okay, well, what happens is there was a subcommittee on constitutional amendments, and it was kind of a dud of a committee. Didn't do a lot of work. It was known as the graveyard, where proposed amendments go to die. But the chair of the subcommittee suddenly dies. So the guy in charge of all the subcommittees is like, all right, I'm gonna shut it down. We're just, like, spending money on this thing. It's pointless. But Birch, when he finds out about this, he goes straight to the guy in charge, and he's like, hey, don't worry about these budgetary concerns. I'll finance the committee out of my own Senate office budget. And Birch is just telling him, like, hey, come on, it's available now. Nobody wants it. Let me have it. I need something to play with. Because he's just looking for something to grab onto. Yeah, he doesn't have, like, a big plan for the Constitution. He not that guy. But he's a charmer. So eventually the guy said, sure, Burch. You can have it. And it changed his life, and it changed our country. Because two months later, Bang. Here is A bulletin from CBS News. November 22, 1963. Three shots were fired at President Kennedy's motorcade in downtown Dallas. John F. Kennedy is shot and killed. Vice President Lyndon Johnson will be taking the oath of office shortly and become the 36th President of the United States. Two weeks later. In the New York Times, there's an article with the headline succession problem about how the terrible assassination of President Kennedy raised an issue of what if a president became disabled because Kennedy, he didn't die immediately? What if he'd gone into a coma or been brain dead, so disabled that he could not have carried out the duties of the president? Duties that could include the power to launch nuclear weapons. There was nothing in the Constitution on this. People were like, shoot, we don't have a plan for this. Which was a problem. But hey, look him over. There's Burch, the chairman of the subcommittee. Constitutional amendments. And this seems like a Constitution level problem. Let's fix it. We got a problem, let's fix it. But another problem. Passing a constitutional amendment is like the hardest thing you can do as a politician because you're required to get 2/3 of the House, 2/3 of the Senate, and 3/4 of the state legislatures, all of them not an easy thing to do. But Burch, he took that as a challenge. And he's got dimples, he's got charisma, unbelievable political skills. And one of the things he did, he went to the American Bar association, he pulled in lawyers, political scientists to try to build a coalition to get nonpartisan support behind him. So he can take this amendment, go to both parties and say it's just logical. This amendment is simple, easy, it's kind of a no brainer amendment. We've got a problem, let's fix it. So he takes his amendment, he goes to the House, the Senate, all the state legislators, and overwhelmingly it passes. Yay. A whole brand new amendment to the Constitution, and that is the 25th Amendment. Presidential inability and succession. Now, the kind of interesting thing is that if you have. Have you heard of the 25th Amendment before? No. No. Okay, so we're calling on vice President Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment. It came up a lot during both the Trump presidency and reportedly calling on Biden's cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment. It has come up a lot during the Biden presidency, which would possibly remove him from office of like, oh, look at this guy. He's so old and he's so irrational and da, da, da, da. And we should use the 25th Amendment to unseat this guy or whatever. Right. Like, it's a sort of political we now. Right. But initially, it was not supposed to be that. It was not political. It was just practical writing. The 25th Amendment to the Constitution is one of the ways I have been able to serve both Indiana and the nation. And for Burch, you know, this young, ambitious guy, like, this is a huge deal, like a founding father level achievement. He's still in his 30s. Birch, 5. What's his theme song? Hey, look him over. He's just singing it to himself in the graveyard. Check me out. Okay, so he passes this constitutional amendment. And Jill says, because it's so hard to pass an amendment, once one happens, people are like, oh, I forgot, you can amend the Constitution. And all of a sudden, it's like a window opens and this burst of amendment activity, and suddenly Burch's graveyard became like a dance club that everybody wanted to get in. And he's the bouncer. You know what I mean? I was thinking, like, Candyland. He's the candy man, and everyone wants into Candyland. I sort of feel like he's more of a candy guy than a dance club guy. Sure, sure. Fair. But, yeah. So all of these people are coming to Birch with these ideas for what they want to see in the Constitution, including the new president, Lyndon B. Johnson. And he says, well, you know, you just passed the Constitution amendment. We'd like you to be the sponsor of one that we want, which is to eliminate what we call the faithless elector. Faithless elector. Faithless elector. Like, without religion? No, but. Okay. So here we are actually finally getting to the thing of electing a president. Okay, sorry, wait. So most people don't actually realize this, but when you vote for the President of the United States, you're not actually voting for the President of the United States. You're voting for someone who then votes for the President of the United States. Oh. So those people are called electors. And basically how this goes is like you vote in your state, your state has a certain number of these electors. And then the electors take a pledge to vote for the candidate who got the most votes in your state. But a pledge is a pledge, and it could be broken. In the history of US presidential elections, approximately 156 electors have broken that pledge. What? And either not voted or have voted for a different candidate essentially have acted as faithless electors. And Johnson, for a lot of reasons, just thought, okay, this is a problem. And Birch, you're a problem solver, so we'd like you to eliminate electors and therefore the prospect of a faithless elector. And Birch said, sure, I'll introduce it as a constitutional amendment. But what happened? What happened was once Birch started holding these hearings on faithless electors, he started learning more and more about the Electoral College, about how it came to be, about why we still had it. And the more he learned, the more he became sort of radicalized, convinced that this system, the Electoral College, that it's a ticking time bomb and that somebody had to stop it. That's coming up after the break. Radiolab is supported by BetterHelp. As many of us are reflecting on what we're thankful for this month, we often forget to express gratitude to someone very near and dear to us, ourselves. It can be hard, or not, always at the top of our minds to remind ourselves that we're doing our best to make sense of the world and to live our lives, and that it's not easy. So let this be a reminder to send some love and thanks to the people in your life, including you. If you need some guidance with this, therapy can help. Working with a therapist can be a great way to reflect and develop coping mechanisms, among other valuable tools. If you're thinking of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a try. It's entirely online, designed to be convenient, flexible and suited to your schedule. So just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist and switch therapist anytime for no additional charge. Let the gratitude flow with BetterHelp. Visit betterhelp.com Radiolab today to get 10% off your first month. That's BetterHelp. H E L P.com Radiolab Radiolab is supported by Made In Cookware. As a Radiolab listener, you know we like to nerd out and explore things like how seagulls from the 1970s shook up our understanding of what's natural in all of us animals and how far the moon actually is. The usual Made In Cookware is into exploration too, creating products that help us answer questions like have you wanted to cook lobster but balked because the process seemed too intimidating? When it comes to picking the right ones and what tools you need to dig in, it can seem like a lot. Armed with Made In's Stainless Clad stock pot and their how to Cook Lobster blog post, there's no need to be afraid. With their professional grade stainless clad, carbon steel, nonstick and enameled cast iron cookware collections, Made in lets you focus on memorable meals. Cook like a pro with Made In. For full details, visit madeincookware.com that's M A D E I N cookware.com WNYC Studios is supported by Lumen, the world's first handheld metabolic coach that measures your metabolism through your breath. And on the app, it lets you know if you're burning fat or carbs and gives you tailored guidance to improve your nutrition, workouts, sleep, and even stress management. All you have to do is breathe into your lumen first thing in the morning and you'll know what's going on with your metabolism, whether you're burning mostly fats or carbs. Then Lumen gives you a personalized nutrition plan for that day based on your measurements. You can also breathe into it before and after workouts and meals so you know exactly what's going on in your body in real time. And Lumen will give you tips to keep on top of your health game. So if you want to stay on track with your health this holiday season, go to Lumen Me WNYC to get 15% off your Lumen, that is L U M E N Me WNYC for 15% off your purchase. Hey, John Favreau here. There's no shortage of political takes in 2024, but quantity doesn't cut it. We need a better conversation about the latest, biggest election of our lives. On Pod Save America, me and my co hosts cut through the noise to help you figure out what matters and how you can help. Every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, Pod Save America is breaking down the political news that makes us laugh, cry, and snap our laptops in half. Expensive year for laptops. Make sure to check out new episodes of Pod Save America on your favorite podcast platform or our YouTube channel. Now. Latif Annie Radio Lab. Okay, before we get going, I'm curious. What do you, what do you, as a Canadian here on a visa, what do you know about the Electoral College? Okay, well, I guess when I first got here I thought this is probably a school you go to when you want to become president. It's a college. It is. That was my first question about it. Why is it called college? But you know what it is? It's like. So the use of the word college here, this is a total tangent. It's college. Like, you know how they have like the College of Cardinals or the College of Surgeons or whatever. It's like college is just like, the meaning is just a group of people. Oh, like a pot of whales. It's like a pod of whales. Yes, exactly. Okay, so we left off. Birch Bay is now focusing his problem solving gaze on the Electoral College. He's having these committee hearings and he's learning. Right. Why it exists, what it does, how it works. And so I think for us to be able to understand why all of this radicalizes him, we have to learn what he learned. We have to go back and understand the Electoral College. Okay, let's. So let's go. Let's go all the way to the beginning to explain. I thought we had started, but it sounds like we haven't even started yet. No, we haven't even started. It's so wonky. But we're ready. You have me. I'm your. I'm your candy man to. I'll follow you anywhere. Okay. All right. So here we go. So here we are in the candyland that is Philadelphia, 1787. The Constitutional Convention and Founding Fathers are like, we're starting this new country. We're very excited about it. The thing we can all agree on is we do not want a king, but we do kind of need someone to be in charge. So we're gonna have this person called the president. But how are we gonna choose the president? That would require some thought. Can I pause and take a little sip of Coke here? Yeah, of course. Go for it. By the way, this is Alex Keyssar. Also, I should say, even in our first conversation, when I was talking to Jill. So there's a great book by Alex Keyzar called why Do we still have the Electoral College? She brought you up. And then basically every other interview we've done for this story, people have brought you up. That's what I tried to do in that book. So he wrote the book, why Do we still have the Electoral College? And he's also a professor of history and social policy at Harvard University. But, okay, so anyway, they couldn't agree on a method of choosing the president. And so there are some ideas on the table. One idea was, well, we just came up with Congress. All right, well, Congress should just elect the president. But that's a bad idea. Then you lose separation of powers and checks and balances. Then the president would be answerable to Congress. Like, what if he runs for reelection? He needs to have their favor. That's stupid. We can't do that. That's a dumb idea. Thanks very much. So someone else in the room says, well, what about the people? And everyone's like, no, can't do that. Look, you know, how is Farmer Johnson in a distant county gonna know about some guy in Virginia running for president? It's 1787. People didn't know anybody beyond their own neighborhood or town. So what they decided to do was to take a break for a week. They just left Philadelphia. George Washington went fishing for the week. What? And they left behind a committee called. And you'll like this, it was called the Committee on Unfinished Parts. I kind of love that. Right? Okay. So these founders, most of whom you never heard of, weeks later, they are still stuck there in Philadelphia. All the cool guys are fishing. All the cool guys are out fishing and doing other stuff. And they have to figure this out. Out to get this thing done. They wanted to get it sent to the states. So they're like, okay, how do we do this? How do we pick a president? How do we do this? And then they figured it out. They were like, okay, how about we just copy paste Congress? What. What does that mean? Well, how do you copy paste? Right, right. Like, just plagiarize. They're not gonna plagiarize. They're just like, okay, we know everybody's already agreed on Congress, right? There's been a lot of debate, a lot of arguing. But what they did to make a government that everybody agreed on to make Congress is they started putting thumbs on scales for different groups of people. Thumb on a scale. Go over it. Go over. Okay. So one of the thumbs is they make the Senate and they say every state doesn't matter if you're big or small. You get two senators. And so that's a little thumb on the scale for the small states that don't have a lot of people in them so that they aren't completely overrun by the big states. Okay. The other thumb is for the South. They say, okay, you can count an enslaved person in your state as three fifths of a person. That way you boost the population of your state and you get more representatives in the House. That was another. To give more power to the south so they weren't overrun by the North. You know, you can imagine them sitting there. Okay, so how do we choose a president? Well, there's. Do big states have more influence than small states? And, you know, and what about slaves? And then we're going to reopen that whole thing. No, we're going to import the whole thing. So what the electoral college is. Is in some respects, a replica of Congress. If you think about it, each state has electors equal to the number of Representatives plus the number of senators. Okay. And then the electors would convene in their state capitals and cast their electoral votes. And so the committee's like, bingo, job done. So that sort of seems smart to me. It is, under the circumstances. Very clever solution. Yeah. So that. That all is Stuff they put in the Constitution. Right. So it's like there's this body of electors that vote for the president. Each state has a certain number of electors based on how many representatives they have in Congress. All of that is in the Constitution. What is not in the Constitution is how to convert the people's votes in the state into electoral votes. Do you do it proportionally? Where if you get 53% of these states vote, you get 53% of the electoral vote. Right, right. Or you could do it by district. Each district in a state gets an electoral vote. But ultimately, the founders are like, we're going to let the states decide. That makes sense. That's like an important part of this country is that the states. That is an important part of this country making big decisions. True. But that might be the biggest mistake they made in this whole process. So basically, and Alex says there is this pivotal moment pretty early on where the system we now have starts to really take shape in the 1800 election between these two sort of juggernauts in the history of this country, Adams and Jefferson. Now, they have also run against each other in 1796. And in that election, which Adams won, Adams had gotten an electoral vote from the state of Virginia, Jefferson State, because Virginia was doing district voting. Adams had won a district, so we got a vote. But in 1800, the Virginia legislature didn't want that to happen again. They saw a close election coming. And so the Virginia politicians got together and passed a state law that said, okay, we're done with this district system. From now on, the way our electors will vote will be winner take all. If you win the majority of the votes in this state, all of our electors will cast their votes for you. And the Virginian politicians, they did this because they knew Jefferson was gonna win a majority of votes in their state. And this way he wouldn't leave any on the tables. A little dirty. A little dirty. I don't know. Something's a little. Yeah, the candy's gone smelly. Because what they're doing is erasing all of the votes of the people who voted for Adams. Yeah, no, exactly. And what's interesting when you look into the documents of it is they passed that law and then they attached to it a kind of apology for doing it effectively, saying, we know this isn't really good or fair. We know it would be better for the country if we did not do this, but we're doing it anyway. So after Virginia did this, shockingly, Massachusetts John Adams state retaliated and did a version of the Same thing. And Alex says after that, the states, they're off to the races. Another state does it, then another state does it. And this is basically what the system is now. And what that system leads to is the feeling that your vote just doesn't actually matter because, like, if you vote for someone for president and then 50% plus one people in your state vote for someone else, your vote doesn't get counted, like for president. It means it thrown out. It's basically. It's effectively thrown out. And that is essentially happening to tens of millions of votes every presidential election. Right. Are you going to make us feel better about voting by the end of this, or. I think. I think so. I think so. It is with pleasure that I introduce Senator Burch Bayh, because I kind of think of Burch and what he was trying to do as a sort of beacon of hope. Thank you very much, Mark. Members of the faculty and student body of ucla, it's a privilege for me to have the chance to be here with you this afternoon and to share some of my thoughts. So when Burge started holding those hearings in the mid-60s on faithless electors, he's having all these different experts come in and testify about the whole history of the electoral College, the fact that it wipes away all these people's votes, you know, all different kinds of things. But one of the things that these experts hit on over and over is that the system is actually fundamentally dangerous. You may say, well, why is it dangerous? Well, basically, it's dangerous. The most dangerous aspect of it is the fact that the present system, the electoral college system, does not guarantee that the man who wins is the man that has the most votes. And Alex says that's because when you have this winner take all system, it transforms the contest into a contest among states. Because once you have winner take all, then winning the state really matters. Winning as many people as you can doesn't. And because of this, the political leaders of both of our major parties know you can lose the popular vote in the election. It doesn't make any difference if you're soundly defeated. So long as you win the right state, you're going to have enough electoral votes to be elected President of the United States. And this had almost just happened in 1960. 1960 was one of those very close elections where if, like, I think it was like 20 or 30,000 votes had gone differently in a few states, the loser of the popular vote would have won because of the electoral College. And this is the thing that all the experts were saying was dangerous which was the very thing that terrified Burch. Because, I mean, we think of the United States as in a particularly fragile moment historically right now. But that was also the case in the 1960s. So remember, in 63, three shots were fired. President Kennedy gets shot and killed. It's the height of the Cold War. There's continued racial unrest and police brutality. By 68, the peak of the war in Vietnam, the whole world is watching chance. The crowd on the side, there's a protest at the Democratic National Convention. On the streets, Dr. Martin Luther King, MLK Jr. Is assassinated, shot to death. Robert Kennedy. Senator Kennedy has been shot. Is that possible? So Burch, he's watching all of this unfold, and he's just really worried when we have an electoral college system, that if we have a system that can take the loser and make them a winner, we tend to erode the confidence in the people of this country, in their president, and in their form of government. That is his huge concern, that at some point in the future, Americans will refuse to recognize the legitimacy of a president. And so once he came out of these committee hearings, learning what he did about the electoral college, he says, you know what we need to do? We need to get rid of it. We don't need to tinker with it. We need to get rid of it. Yes, it should be one person, one vote. The direct popular election of the president. One person, one vote. It's the only plan that guarantees you that the candidate with the most votes will win. And from this point forward, he devoted himself to this cause, to take the electoral college and burn it to the ground. That's coming up after a short break. Radiolab is supported by Made In Cookware. As a Radiolab listener, you know, we like to nerd out and explore things like how seagulls from the 1970s shook up our understanding of what's natural in all of us animals and how far the moon actually is. The usual Made in Cookware is into exploration too, creating products that help us answer questions like have you wanted to cook lobster but balked because the process seemed too intimidating? When it comes to picking the right ones and what tools you need to dig in, it can seem like a lot. Armed with Made In's stainless clad stock pot and their how to cook lobster blog post, there's no need to be afraid. With their professional grade stainless clad, carbon steel, nonstick and enameled cast iron cookware collections, Made in lets you focus on memorable meals. Cook like a pro with Made In. For full details, visit madeincookware.com that's M A D E I N cookware.com WNYC Studios is supported by Lumen, the world's first handheld metabolic coach that measures your metabolism through your breath. And on the app, it lets you know if you're burning fat or carbs and gives you tailored guidance to improve your nutrition, workouts, sleep, and even stress management. All you have to do is breathe into your lumen first thing in the morning and you'll know what's going on with your metabolism, whether you're burning mostly fats or carbs. Then, Lumen gives you a personalized nutrition plan for that day based on your measurements. You can also breathe into it before and after workouts and meals so you know exactly what's going on in your body in real time. And Lumen will give you tips to keep on top of your health game. So if you want to stay on track with your health this holiday season, go to Lumen Me wnyc to get 15% off your lumen, that is L u m e n me wnyc for 15% off your purchase. Hey, Jon Favreau here. There's no shortage of political takes in 2024, but quantity doesn't cut it. We need a better conversation about the latest, biggest election of our lives. On Pod Save America, me and my co host cut through the noise to help you figure out what matters and how you can help. Every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, Pod Save America is breaking down the political news that makes us laugh, cry, and snap our laptops in half. Expensive year for laptops. Make sure to check out new episodes of Pod Save America on your favorite podcast platform or our YouTube channel now. Okay, Latif. Annie Radio Lab. Back from break. Back from break. Can I tell you another fun fact about the Electoral College, Latif? I would like nothing more. Okay, so take a guess. Okay. Okay. What is the least amount of the popular vote? What is the least proportion percentage of the country that could vote for you where you could still win the electoral college? 49%. So you think 49% of people have to vote for you to win the electoral college? 40%. No. I don't know. I mean, nothing makes sense. I mean, like in a. Yes, I would say 40 something. 23%. Wow. So if you get 50% plus one in all the smallest states. Yeah. You could conceivably get 23% of Americans votes and become the President. That is shocking. Isn't that crazy? Yeah. Okay, so 23%, that would be like. That has never happened. Okay, what has happened? Five Times, five times in the history of this country, a candidate has lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote and become the president. And so crazy besides those five times, it nearly happened in 1960. It nearly happened again in 1968. And so that year, 1968, Birch Bay thinks now is the time to launch this amendment to abolish the electoral College. And having just done the 25th, he had some sense of it. And Jay, his chief of staff, said, step one, build a coalition. And so please join me in a warm welcome for the Democratic senator from Indiana. He's going to these nonpartisan groups, Senator Birch Baye giving speeches. It's extremely important to the American Bar association that when the president is the United States is elected, the League of Women Voters, the Chamber of Commerce, we know with confidence that he is the president of the United States. Saying that we have a problem here again, Birch. By staffer Bob Bl. I'm telling you, I would. It was so exciting. Senator B. Has launched a campaign. He was on TV every night, establishing a nationwide movement to do away with the electoral College, hammering home this idea, which was, each of us, whether we live in Rhode island or Texas, one word. Indian. Alaska. Equality. Each one of us ought to have the same opportunity to elect the President. It ought to be one person, one vote. And it seems to me there's no excuse for any other system. One person, one vote. Everybody's vote should count the same. And by 1969, opinion polls show that around 80% of the people favor a more direct election of presidents. 80% of Americans agreed with him. Bai intends to get Congress to pass a direct election law this year. And so 1969, his amendment goes in front of the House. And what happened was, boom. Overwhelming, huge victory, 339 to 70. What? Easy pass. Wow. Unbelievable. It was just amazing. I mean, right now, it would be extremely difficult to get a house vote of 80% to declare what day it was or to declare Christmas to be a holiday. But as Alex Keyssar points out, then the action switches to the Senate. And in the Senate, Burch hits a wall, a wall made up of two different groups of people. One of them was senators from small states. Now, small state senators, mostly Republican, said, oh, well, we get two votes automatically because we have two senators. And that was the compromise made at the Constitutional convention. Remember, those two senators was the thumb on the scale for the small states, right? So, I mean, think of Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota. These states that have these electoral votes and no voters. These two votes are a big deal. And the small state senators wanted to preserve these two electoral votes. So that was one group, and then the other group standing in his way were Southern segregationists. And they were against Birch's amendment because the electoral college in a winner take all system gave them more power while continuing to erase black voters. It was almost like that same thing back at the convention with the three fifths clause, because white segregationists could use the black people in their state to count towards the state population, which gave them more electoral voters, more power. But at the same time, because of the system, the winner take all system, the overwhelming white majority would wipe out and erase the black vote. So it becomes something of a article of faith that the electoral college is key to protecting the, quote, Southern way of life. Senator James Allen of Alabama, he had a, quote, something to the effect that the electoral College is the South's only political advantage left. Let's keep it. The Senate has refused to shut off debate to the proposed constitutional amendment to elect presidents by a direct popular vote. And basically because of these two groups of senators, small state Republicans and Southern segregationists, Burch's amendment gets stuck in the Senate six votes short, six votes short of the necessary two thirds. And now electoral reform seems about ready to fall. But there was one last hope, which came in the form of a very unlikely ally. Nixon. Nixon. Republican President Richard Nixon. Whether there'll be any action up here on Capitol Hill depends pretty much on one man, Richard Nixon. And Nixon, even though he got elected by the electoral College, he had said, it's obsolete, it's dangerous, it should go right. And Jay says Nixon knew how popular Birch's amendment was. He had seen that House vote so overwhelming that right after it, Nixon made a public statement saying, in view of what the House has done, the only chance for reform of the present system is for the Senate to do the same thing. And Nixon being a Republican president, maybe he could put some pressure on these Republicans who are blocking the amendment. It'll take all the political clout a new president can muster to keep this new Congress from sweeping electoral reform under the legislative rug. But meanwhile, again, Jill Lepore. This other whole drama is unraveling in the Senate Judiciary Committee that Bayh could not have anticipated, which is that Nixon has a bunch of Supreme Court nominees that are going to come before the Senate Judiciary Committee on which Bayh serves. And Nixon has pledged that he will appoint a Southerner to the court. So early 1969, Nixon nominates a judge from South Carolina, Clement Haynesworth. And Haynesworth, he has this problem. Haynesworth had Made a number of decisions in which he had a financial interest. He owned stock in companies that he made decisions that helped those companies. And in the confirmation hearings, Burch, he had no intention of opposing Haynesworth, Planned on voting yes, confirming Haynesworth. And Burch kept saying, I gave him every opportunity to say, you're right. You know, if I had to do it again, I would have recused myself. And he would never do it. He kept insisting he had done nothing wrong. And to Burch, it was pretty clear that this guy, if not totally corrupt. We got personal. Financial. Yeah, Secrets. Yeah. And so Burch is like, all right, this guy is not fit for the court. And so. Good evening. In a severe setback to president Nixon, the senate today firmly refused to confirm the supreme court nomination of judge Clement Haynesworth. Birch by leads the charge against Nixon's supreme court nominee. President Nixon was obviously not pleased by what the Senate did to his nominee. The president issued a written in which he expressed disappointment and anger over the senate rejection of Hainsworth. Haynesworth, the 10th man in history to be so rejected, the first since 1930. Well, if so, does that mean, like, what he's doing to Nixon here? Is that going to affect his efforts with the amendment stuff? At this point, I don't think he knows. But Nixon says, goddamn, goddamn, Birchbuy, I'm going to go further south and farther right. So he does. So he brings in his next southerner, this guy Harold Carswell, who's from Florida, who is Birch, further south and much further right, but also happens to be completely unqualified for the supreme court. I have to tell you, I looked for a place to hide, but there was no one else there. This is Burch from an oral history from 2009 done by the University of Virginia's Miller center, talking about the Carswell nomination. I have a good recollection how this all happened because I'd been sort of commissioned to lead the charge here. I got together in my office, all of the. All of the groups he said he got together. Union leaders, Jewish leaders, black leaders. I remember going around the room and saying, what do you think? Now, we knew then that Carswell, As a young 25 year old, when he was running for the state legislature in Georgia, had said, I yield to no man in my belief in white supremacy. We knew that. Was that enough? Pretty jamming. Well, but, you know, everybody had. Was exhausted fighting the Haynesworth thing. There was no stomach left for another battle. And as we went around the room, here are these people who had thrown themselves on the spears of the opposition to haynesworth said, well, you know, Birch, senator, there have been a lot of changes in the south since then. And, you know, birch, you know, none of us want to be responsible for everything we said when we were 25, and it was that way all the way around until we got to Clarence Mitchell, who was the executive director of the naacp. We got around to him, and he said, well, gentlemen, it was almost as we were getting ready to leave. Gentlemen, I respect where you're all coming from, but in my lifetime of experience, I found that once a person ever feels that way, they never, ever really changed their mind. Burch says that when he went home that night, he couldn't sleep. He kept thinking about what Clarence Mitchell had said in that room. And in that moment, he didn't know what to do. Like, here's Nixon, a potential ally for his amendment. Nixon had just been elected. Okay, this is Nixon's first year as a president. And to shoot down another nominee of his. It would have been the first time a president had had two nominees defeated in 76 years. It would humiliate Nixon, likely turn him against Burch, and kill the thing the country most needs, his chance at abolishing the electoral college, the thing the country least can see that it needs. There were several times when he said, if I do this, it's gonna hurt me over here. Oh, like where if he votes no, it might hurt his amendment. Yes. Or do you protect the highest court in the land, the most influential court, from having a white supremacist on it for who knows how long? Like, which thing gives you the best outcome? And I was rolling and tossing. In fact, I got out of bed and crawled into bed in the guest room. He didn't want to bother his wife, who was asleep. And he started thinking about, like, in their home, they had their son Evan. And he'd always been telling Evan, the way that we make change in this country is we work through the system. We always work through the system. Somehow or other, it came to me that if my face was black and Evan's face was black, and this guy, Harold Carswell, was sitting on the supreme court of the United States, and I said, son, we're going to work through the system. He'd say, dad, the system's already said what it thinks about us. So the next morning, I got my staff together, and I said, come on, we're going to rally the troops. I think we got 25 people who stand up against this guy. Judge carswell's nomination died today, March 1970 while his amendment is still stuck in the Senate. Burch leads the charge against Carswell and single handedly destroyed his chance of confirmation. The Senate dealt President Nixon another embarrassing defeat, rejecting his second Supreme Court nominee. The end of the long fight to confirm. And so Birch's amendment sits and languishes in the Senate. Six votes short. And Nixon, despite having come out publicly and said the Senate had to act on Electoral College reform, despite the fact that Nixon was the one last person who could maybe sway some of these Republican senators who were blocking Birch, Nixon never lifted a finger. He didn't do a thing. He never ever called a single Republican senator and said, I'd like you to vote for direct popular election. I was asked if it were true. The White House is not helping because of his fight against the President's Supreme Court nominees, Hainsworth and Carswell. Yeah, I'm not naive enough to suggest that it isn't a possibility, but that's a poor way to run a country. Now, we can't say for sure that Nixon was retaliating against Burch, but what we do know is that a few years later it was made public that Nixon kept a list of his political enemies. And the very first name on that list is Birch. Buy No. And that's the thing. Had Birch not tanked Nixon's nominees, maybe Nixon would have pushed some senators around. And maybe quite possibly today we would have in the USA a totally different way of picking our President. Because one thing is true. If it had gotten through that vote in the Senate, it had already passed in the House, the support in the public was above 80%. At that point, it would absolutely have been ratified. Instead, it fell six votes short. And that was that. But presidents come and go. A senator can stick around for a while. And Birch would ultimately get another chance at passing his amendment under another President. Only this time he would find the people he thought he could count on, the people he thought were on his side, were suddenly standing against him. That's after the break. Latif, Annie, radio lab. Do you know that every time it seems that the Senate gets into a major squabble, my next guest is in the middle of it. He led the fight against the Haynesworth and Carswell nominations. Would you welcome the junior senator from Indiana, Senator Birch Bayh. So 1970, Birch's election amendment fails. But during the 70s, he goes on to do some pretty momentous stuff. He passes a different constitutional amendment, the 26th amendment. But the injustice of lowering the voting age to 18, a voting system that sends young men to Vietnam where the coal statistics on the battle show that half of them who died in Vietnam weren't old enough to vote for the public official to send them there. Seems to me this is not the type of democratic system we ought to be proud of. So that made for two amendments making him the only person since James Madison, the founding fathers, to write more than one constitutional amendment. Wow, that's amazing. Was a voting age 21 before? Yeah. Also. Yeah. He wrote Title IX. Have you ever heard of Title IX? No. It's mostly known for women's college sports, but it had to do with the real issue of women in higher education. It's this legislation that basically says that any school that gets any public funding needs to treat men and women equally. It changed the country. But throughout all of this, the thing that he is just obsessing over and that he thinks would be his biggest legacy is abolishing the electoral college. And in the late 70s, he thinks he has his best shot at doing it. And that's because Republican Richard Nixon. I shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. Watergate happened, so he's out of office now. James Earl Carter. Jimmy Carter elected the next president of the United States. A democrat from the south is now the president of the United States. When he takes office, one of the first things he does. President Carter said congress today, a big package of proposed election reforms is he tells Congress, it included an abolishment of the electoral college. We need to get rid of the electoral college. And in the late 70s, he was set up to do that because now his party, the Democrats, had this big majority in the senate. Clear sailing, smooth sailing ahead. Right. They think they have the votes. But as burch is getting ready to bring his amendment back to the Senate, a whole bunch of rabbis, leaders of Jewish organizations in New York and in California and other places had started teaming up with leaders in the black community, and they have joined the conservative south in support of the electoral college. What? I didn't know if I was having a nightmare. This is another former Birchbey staffer, Frederick Williams. Yeah, they didn't have to cold cock him like that. You know, he had no idea those guys were going that way. He's like, it's very much an ET2 Brutus kind of a moment, Right? Totally. It made no sense. Okay, well, why are they, like, why would they do that? Well, because there was a belief in parts of the African American community, which is that the electoral college advantaged black voters, because. And this was the theory that black voters were swing voters in swing states. There were a number of Jewish leaders that argued the same thing, that we have this impact on how New York goes and how Florida goes. Well, can we. Can you. Can you spell that out a little bit more? Can you explain that? What they're saying is that if we as a bloc, you know, blacks, for instance, typically have been voting 90% for the Democrat. If their votes can tip which way New York goes or Florida or Illinois or some other state, then they're having a real impact on the Electoral College vote. Because those states, like New York used to be a swing state. Yeah, California, too, Mississippi too. And so in these big, crucial swing states, black voters and Jewish voters felt they had sort of an outsized power. I mean, Jesse Jackson, prominent black leader at the time, proclaimed, you know, the hands that picked the cotton have now picked the president. And this is kind of the thing about the Electoral College, especially in a winner take all systems, is this possibility that a minority group like black people or Jewish people or Hispanic people, or even like labor unions, teacher unions, many groups that you could name could become the decisive votes. Any minority in the right state at the right time could become extremely powerful. And thus to switch to a national popular vote would remove that power. And whatever group you belong to, you would just go back to being a tiny minority in the country as a whole. And the fear was from these black leaders and Jewish leaders in the 1970s, is that political parties could then just ignore them. And there's this amazing moment in a committee hearing on Birch's amendment, and Birch is obviously present for it. The leader of the National Urban League, very prominent organization, Vernon Jordan, testified at the committee hearing. And he opens his testimony by saying, me and Senator Birch Bayh are very close personal friends. Senator Birch Bayh has been a friend to black people in this country. But I'm here to say we do not support this amendment. And he goes on to basically say, we as a people have been denied power in this country for over 200 years, and now that we finally have some, you're trying to curb it. And basically goes even further to say, if we were to support this switch to the national popular vote for president, our voting power would, quote, unquote, melt away. You know, just to defend Vernon Jordan, his argument wasn't 100%, just, hey, black people are in these states, so we have some power. He has a good quote, too. He said, the Electoral College system acts as a break to extremism. So we did also speak to this guy, Harry Roth. I'm director of outreach for Save Our States A pro Electoral College organization. We defend the Electoral college system, trying to educate lawmakers and their constituents. And we reached out to him because we saw he wrote an essay about this moment when black leaders and Jewish leaders were coming out against Birch's amendment. And, you know, and I mean, I wouldn't say 1979 was the height of racism in America, but, you know, Vernon Jordan, National Urban League, they were around for a while. They saw how bad things could get. And, you know, they feared a racial demagogue who hates blacks coming in and winning the presidency by maybe getting enough support from white voters in a time like that. But with the Electoral College, that makes it much more difficult. You have to pay attention to blacks. You have to pay attention to Jews, who. I think Jews make up 1% of the population, but Jews make up what percentage of New York? A very, you know, a decent percentage of at least New York City. So they're important in a state like that. You can't. It's going to be hard to win New York if you're just attacking Jews left and right. Oh, okay. So, like, it sounds so like, Birch is just sort of taking this. This in. Sort of like taking these arguments in. What does he do with them? Like, what does he do next? Well, I got a call at like, must have been between 6:30 and 7:00 in the morning. Frederick says when Birch first learned about this opposition, that, you know, that all these people were flipping on him, he said, please be in the office at 8:00. We have to deal with this. And it's hard to say exactly which meeting this occurred at and when it took place. But Birch tells his story of when a man from a prominent black organization and a man from a prominent Jewish organization came to his office, sat down with him and told him, direct popular election is not good for us, that this hurts us in all sorts of ways and we're not letting you pass this. Just. They even ask him to withdraw it. And Burch says, I've worked my whole life voting for measures to make you equal to everybody else. And you're sitting in my office telling me that you want your vote to count for more. Get the hell out of here. Wow. And Frederick says he would later talk to that same black leader, the one Birch kicked out, saying, look at, look at, man. The senator's been with you all the time, going all the way back to Carswell and Haynesworth. What are you doing here? He says, well, we have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies, just permanent interest. So basically, what Happens is these same black Jewish leaders kind of just go down the hall of the Senate and start knocking on doors of a handful of liberal Democrats from big states. And those liberal Democrats, including a young senator from the small state of Delaware, Joe Biden, vote against Burch's amendment. And so in 1979, once again, his amendment fails, but this time, the wall that stops him is liberal Democrats, the few remaining segregationists and small state Republicans was like, I don't know the degree to which you can say, but, like, was that objectively true that they had more clout or sway as minority groups under electoral college versus how much they would have had in the popular vote? It was probably true in the 1976 election when Carter ran, but it certainly wasn't true as a broad pattern. And it was clearly evidence within a very few years that it's. It's. It's simply. It simply was not a dominant pattern or a clear pattern. Oh, wow. So it was like a truth with a shelf life. Yeah, a very short shelf life. Okay, so, like, what's. Like, what's Birch's next step? So 1980, Reagan gets elected in a kind of landslide, and Birch loses his election. He's not in office anymore, and that's. That's the end of his career as a legislator. It's a sad story. I'm okay. Well, that's a. Because it sounds like you all were very productive. You all got a lot done. Well, Birch Bagh got a lot done. And we always describe this as the one that got away. Like, this is the thing you would think about. Yeah, yeah. He said it was his greatest regret. Huh. Wow. Yeah. And, you know, there's this moment in one of Burch's oral histories where he kind of. He almost like, turns on himself, and he asks himself, like, what could I have done differently? What could I have done to keep that from happening? And I don't know, like, from even what I've read, from what we've read, like, it doesn't feel like there was anything he could have done differently, because this was just. This is the thing about the Electoral College. It's distributing power. Right. And that's the whole thing about the Electoral College that Birch didn't like that it was distributing power. He thought power should be equal. And that gets to this kind of central question of democracy, which is like, should you put thumbs on scales? How do you do it and for which people and for how long, and who gets them and who doesn't, and how hard do you press that thumb down those are fundamental questions and they're really hard questions to answer. Yeah, totally. And it seems like once you do put a thumb on the scale, it's just so hard to take that thumb off. Yeah, really hard. And Jill even pointed out that after Birch's Amendment failed in 1979, that was kind of it. It's a kind of, you know, powerful pronouncement about the end of the campaign to abolish the Electoral College. Have we ever had a hearing on abolishing the Electoral College since? Is there any. Do we even still do public opinion surveys about it? You know, and the thing is, Birch Bay was right that the more often a presidential candidate will win the Electoral College and lose the popular vote, the more likely it will be that at some point in the future, Americans will refuse to recognize the legitimacy of a president. And it doesn't matter which side you favor. You cannot favor an election where we can't all agree on the result. This election is close. Everyone knows that in the race to 270 electoral votes, every vote matters. If Harris were to get Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, you can see we're going to put New Mexico in play. We're going to put Virginia in play. We're going to put New Hampshire in play. Harris battleground state of North Carolina. The candidates are fighting to win key Midwestern states. South Asians in the state are the largest and fastest growing Asian voting bloc there. Like Michigan, both are determined to get as much of the union vote there as they can. The Democrats, if they can see huge African American enthusiasts, they'll continue to play there. The Nebraska district that could if it's close, this tells you swing the election. Both campaigns agree. Look at all the spending in Pennsylvania. It's about evenly matched. Then Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, North Carolina and Nevada. The Democrats behind in North Carolina, waiting to see if they really mean it. Waiting to see if the Harris campaign will put significant money into North Carolina Trump campaign. Matt Kilty and I reported this episode. Matt Kielty and Simon Adler produced it. Matt Kielty, Simon Adler and Jeremy Bloom contributed original music and sound design. Jeremy Blum mixed it, Diane Kelly fact checked it and Becca Bressler and Pat Walters edited it. We first heard about this story from Jill Lepore who is writing a book about the Constitution coming out next year. In the meantime, you can read her magisterial history of the United States. These truths we have linked to that on our website along with Bob Blaymire's Burge biobiography, Alex Keystar's book about the Electoral College and so much more. Even Birch spies little jingle is on there. What an earworm. That is the last thing I have to say. If you live in this United States and you are able to please go vote peer pressure others to do the same. Thank you so much for listening and good luck to us all. Send him to Washington on by you can rely in November Remember him at the polls his name you can't pass by. Indiana zone birch fight. Indiana zone birch fight. Hi, I'm David and I'm from Baltimore, Maryland. Radiolab was created by Jad Abumrad and is edited by Soren Wheeler. Lulu Miller and Latif Nasser are our co hosts. Dylan Keefe is our director of sound design. Our staff includes Simon Adler, Jeremy Bloom, Becca Bressler, W. Harry Fortuna, David Gable, Maria Paz Gutierrez, Sindhu Nyanam Sambandan, Matt Kielty, Annie McEwen, Rebecca Lacks, Alex Neeson, Sara Khari, Sarah Sandbach, Arianne Wack, Pat Walters, and Molly Webster. Our fact checkers are Diane Kelly, Emily Krieger, and Natalie Middleton. Hi, this is Ellie from Cleveland, Ohio. Leadership support for Radiolab Science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Science Sandbox Assignments Foundation Initiative and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.