← Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov
Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov
Trump's Immigration Crackdown and the Democrats' Muted Response
01:01:45
Loading summary
Transcript76 lines
- [00:01]
LifeLock Ad
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. The new year brings new health goals and wealth goals. Protecting your identity is an important step. Lifelock monitors millions of data points per second. If your identity is stolen, Lifelock's restoration specialists will fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Resolve to make identity, health and wealth part of your New year's goals with LifeLock. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit LifeLock.com podcast terms apply.
- [00:28]
Scott Galloway
If you're enjoying our content, just a quick ask, please. Right now, hit that subscribe button on YouTube and also hit subscribe in our dedicated Raging Moderates feed. Jess has two young kids at home. Be supportive.
- [00:44]
Jess Katarlov
They have to go to college, even though higher ed is such a disaster.
- [00:47]
Scott Galloway
Hit it now. Please help us out and in exchange we will do our best. Maybe won't be as moderate as you like, but we promise we'll be very, very modern.
- [00:56]
Jess Katarlov
You're not supposed to tell them that.
- [00:58]
Scott Galloway
That's right. And we'll be both ragin moderate. Please hit the subscribe button. Welcome to Raging Moderates. I'm Scott Galloway.
- [01:06]
Jess Katarlov
And I'm Jess Katarlov.
- [01:08]
Scott Galloway
Jess, this is the part of the show where we banter.
- [01:10]
Jess Katarlov
I'm reading the same note. What would you like to banter about?
- [01:13]
Scott Galloway
Well, let's bring this back to me. So ask me what I did this weekend.
- [01:17]
Jess Katarlov
What did you do this weekend? How fantastic was it?
- [01:20]
Scott Galloway
Well, Jess, I don't like to talk about me or my personal life, but on Saturday morning I had my 14 year old, just me and him. And so I said, what do you want to do? And I knew involved something in football. So we jumped on the Eurostar on Saturday morning, which is lovely. Yeah, it takes 2 hours and 20 minutes. Pancras or St. Pancras Station is about 10 minutes from where we're living. Two hours and 20 minutes later, we're at the Gare du Nord, which is I think train station of north or something in French, just for those of you out there. And then we're at the hotel. We went and had an amazing, my favorite or our favorite lunch. We had steak frites and then we went to the most amazing little stores, mostly chocolatiers and crepe stores. And then we went back and napped and went to the pool. When you have a 14 year old, you got to go to the pool.
- [02:12]
Jess Katarlov
I've learned that that's lasts until high school that they're into going to the pool.
- [02:16]
Scott Galloway
You know, his only criteria for hotel is do they have a pool. And we always go to the pool. And then we went. And then we had a dinner at the most fabulous restaurant at the top of this new fancy hotel called Cheval Blanc. And we got dressed up, and then we got dressed down and we went to the psg. Paris Saint Germain Football. That's the major team in Paris. Oh, someone's going to say no, they're not Ty Renz, which was a big disappointment for psg, but we went and saw the football game, came back next morning, woke up, had a lovely breakfast, and then went to Notre Dame, which is spectacular.
- [02:54]
Jess Katarlov
Oh, it looks amazing.
- [02:56]
Scott Galloway
Spectacular. And then caught the US star back. I mean, 24 hours. And just it was one of those incredible weekends with my son. What did you do?
- [03:05]
Jess Katarlov
Well, I went to a three year old's birthday party on Saturday morning. There was cake, Funfetti flavor, which is my favorite.
- [03:13]
Scott Galloway
So do they rent a place or is it one of those where it's rich people in Tribeca or do they have to rent a place?
- [03:17]
Jess Katarlov
Well, I think both of those types classify as rich people because if you can rent a place for your toddler's birthday, they did it at their building, actually, so. And I don't. I don't know what they earn, so I can't comment on that. But it was a lovely party. And then Saturday night we went out to dinner with three other couples, which was very lively. Um, a lot of fun. We trying out a new babysitter seemed to go okay. The toddler by the end said, I liked new babysitter, so great. But it was nice to go out. You know how you usually are out with one other couple, but being out with three other couples, you know, tons of conversations going on. We had a nice time, but, you know, like home by 9:30, asleep by 10, the usual.
- [04:03]
Scott Galloway
So four couples, that usually gives everyone permission to drink more is what I find. And two, there was a lot of.
- [04:08]
Jess Katarlov
Drinking and a discussion about how one person thinks that their partner drinks too much, which.
- [04:15]
Scott Galloway
And makes company. That's nice.
- [04:17]
Jess Katarlov
Yeah. I asked to be excluded from the conversation. Cause also I barely drink. I'm a lightweight and I guess not that fun. And so I'm always very uncomfortable with those conversations.
- [04:29]
Scott Galloway
Yeah. So I'll give you a little bit of a heads up on what's coming your way. In about seven to 10 years, you're gonna freak out about the fact that you've spent so much time just raising kids and that you're losing your youth and you and your female friends will start partying like fucking rock stars, diagnosed with ass cancer. You're gonna start drinking like crazy. You're gonna start doing girls trips all the time. You're gonna abuse alcohol, you're gonna experiment with drugs, and you're gonna make all the guys trips that movies have been depicted on seem like a tea party. They talk about the midlife crisis that men have. I think men's are longer but less severe. The midlife crisis for women happens earlier. Specifically, I think when they leave kind of their birthing years and they're worried they're losing kind of their hot girl 20s and 30s, and they go apeshit. So anyways, you got that coming. You got that coming.
- [05:21]
Jess Katarlov
Oh, well, that sounds like fun, because I. Yeah, I'm definitely not doing any of that. No, none of that at this point. Well, it's hard, you know, what are you gonna do every once in a while, I have a lot of good friends because I.
- [05:30]
Scott Galloway
You have a second glass of Chardonnay. Is that when you.
- [05:33]
Jess Katarlov
No, I'm not a white wine. I have one drink. Also, I only drink Tito's Grapefruit and Soda. You said it's like a modified Paloma. Not really.
- [05:43]
Scott Galloway
Here's another prediction. I mean, you're gonna start getting unsolicited bottles of bot Tito's. When I started talking about how much I love Zacapa, I'd show up to events and they'd have a bottle of Zacapa. So everyone. Okay, Tito's for the lady. Good, good. All right, enough of that.
- [05:58]
Jess Katarlov
Great banter. I loved it.
- [06:00]
Scott Galloway
Yeah, that worked. Check that box. In today's episode of Raging Moderates, we're discussing Trump's whirlwind first week in office, how Democrats are responding to Trump, and what it really means to be a moderate in today's political climate. Okay, so let's bust right into it. Donald Trump has hit the ground running in his first week back in office, signing nearly 50 executive orders and actions that are already sort of reshaping politics in our country. These include escalating immigration crackdowns or deportation flights, and a southern border troop surge, as well as targeting birthright citizenship and freezing asylum programs. On Sunday, he also got into a feud with the president of Colombia over deportation flights. Meanwhile, he has halted foreign aid worldwide and revoked security clearances from former officials critical of him. Add to that his controversial pardons of January 6th defendants, the confirmation of cabinet appointments, including Pete Hegseth, despite numerous allegations against him, and threats to eliminate FEMA while visiting disaster zones, including Hurricane Helene's wreckage in North Carolina and wildfire ravage California. It's A whirlwind start that is already redefining how America governs, communicates, and is viewed globally. Jess, there's a lot to unpack here from Trump's first week. What stood out to you the most?
- [07:15]
Jess Katarlov
That there's a lot. That's the point, right? We are so quickly back to where we left Trump 1.0, which is, I'm gonna throw everything at the wall and just see what sticks. And it feels as though we have a bunch of angry teens that are in charge of the government, right? Trying everything, pushing boundaries, waiting for someone to slap them on the wrist to push back. Maybe that comes from, you know, part of the internal caucus. We'll talk about that later on with some of the DEI initiatives that they scaled back, but, like, waiting for the courts to come and get them, you know, hoping that they just can skate through with some of this stuff. I feel there's an overwhelming sense of manufactured chaos to everything and that we are living in the midst of. You would know better than me if it is in fact the biggest branding exercise in history. But this golden age of America, and he has lots of social media spots about it out there on all of his channels. It feels like he's just going full steam ahead with this social media driven approach to governance. Loyalty tests everything that he left on the table from the first time around. He's picking it up and doing it to the nth degree if he can get away with it. And he's just calling our bluff, right? Just saying, well, come and get me. Right? So that's my, it's my feeling writ large about what's gone on so far. What about you?
- [08:50]
Scott Galloway
Yeah, I think that's right. It feels as if one, you could argue this is leadership, that he's had kind of four years to prepare for what he would do and just hitting the ground running and has decided, okay, I'm gonna, you know, promises made, promises kept. And it's going aggressively at everything he talked about and moving, you know, their fleet of foot, signing executive orders on the dais. So you could argue it's leadership. I like what you said. The world's largest branding event. I hadn't thought of it that way. I think that's really interesting. At the same time, you sort of flooding the zone, which is so much shit or actions that wouldn't have, wouldn't have flown before. And one of the things about our government, the reason why we have three branches is it's meant to have this wonderful intransigence where we sometimes, to a fault Wrestle stuff to the ground and really examine it. And there's just none of that. Now. I would give more points to the Trump administration than I would give to the Democratic Party right now, who appears to be just caught flat footed in this mix of can you believe this shit? We don't know what to do. And trying to sign up for this PBS Hallmark channel of we need to come together and we need to cooperate with the President. They're all trying to, they're all in such shock about this win. And, you know, while it was a small number of votes, he went kind of seven for seven in swing states. They're all trying to pretend to be more moderate and say, I'll work with the president and they don't want to come right out of the box shitposting him. I think that's a failed strategy. I think they wanted war. I think we should have it. I'm not up for normalizing an insurrectionist and a rapist. So I guess that doesn't make me a moderate because I won't sign up to this.
- [10:27]
Jess Katarlov
Great. We'll just end the podcast right now.
- [10:29]
Scott Galloway
But I, I would argue that there's this, we have this sort of notion, it's time to come together. I don't agree. I think Democrats and moderate Republicans need to come to the rescue. I think some of this stuff is just so over the line and so un American. You know, rescinding the security detail of people who he doesn't like with live.
- [10:53]
Jess Katarlov
Iranian threats to their. I mean, to their lives. I mean, if you have. Tom Cotton may be the hero in all of this, which is frightening to me, but.
- [11:04]
Scott Galloway
Well, he wants a security detail when he's out of office.
- [11:07]
Jess Katarlov
Well, he definitely wants one on January 6th. Oh, no, that was Josh Hawley who was running away like a little girl. No offense to little girls. Some of it is just petty. Some of it is the revenge tour. Some of it I do think is rooted in a genuine ideology. But then it's always taken one step further. And I've been thinking about this notion of what is the kernel of truth that gets us to the crazy place that we've ended up, right? Because a lot of what's going on right now, I believe is Democrats fault, right? Like we walked into very specific traps. And so we ended up with people telling us essentially, I want a bloodless revolution, right? I want the establishment so far away that I can't even see Nancy Pelosi. All of this makes me sick. And I would rather take a flyer on the K agent than have someone who is routine and boring and also is afraid to say things that are common sense, like the thing that's right in front of you. So if we look at, with the DEI revolution that's going on now, that comes from, you know, after the murder of George Floyd, that companies just added, you know, 50 to 100 DEI employees there. It was crazy. I was looking at data from Loudoun County, Virginia. They have a DEI office that they're spending enough on it that they could hire 125 new teachers if they took that money and did that. Obviously a parent in that district is going to say, I would rather have new teachers than have dozens of employees in the DEI office. For instance, on the trans issue, we talk about this regularly. If you're going to say that it's fine for Leah Thomas to compete at the collegiate level, people are going to think that you are insane on trans issues. And then they're going to pick someone who's going to overcorrect and take away protections for trans people. On immigration, if you're going to say the border is secure, people are going to look at you like you're a lunatic. Especially once migrants are getting bused to northeastern liberal cities and they're understanding the implications of how El Paso, Texas has been living. And we're going to have the overcorrection and we're going to see stuff like this, like the, I don't even want to call it a rise in deportations. I find it fascinating. And this goes to the social media presidency or just who has the best branding exercise of this? Because they're out there saying, promises made, promises kept. We deported, you know, 310 undocumented people or illegals. They would say, I would say undocumented because I'm polite. And Biden was deporting sometimes. It got over 400 people per day. I think on average he was at 310 per day. But the Democrats never talked about anything that they were doing. And that's the difference in this. If you leave people in the dark about what your administration is actually doing, and I'm talking about the stuff that matters to them, not the stuff that feels ancillary or for show, they're going to pick the other person. And now people are running around saying, oh, well, Donald Trump is the toughest on immigration. No, actually Barack Obama was the toughest on immigration. And we have been deporting a lot of people. People don't know that border crossings are down 55% at the end of the Biden administration after, obviously, a huge surge in the beginning. So we need a new digital strategist that's for sure, the next time around that we do this. And I don't know. Have you listened to any of Chris Hayes's interview about his new book about attention and, like, the attention economy?
- [14:38]
Scott Galloway
Oh, that's a new term, attention economy. Let me think. I started using that about 15 fucking years ago. Anyways, what did Chris Hayes said He's discovered the attention economy. What does Chris have to say?
- [14:47]
Jess Katarlov
No, he didn't. No, he didn't discover it, but he was. He's talking about it in context of recent outcomes and this race just to be the first person to say something that someone sees on their phone and how meaningful that is for that. And I cannot think of an instance where Democrats were the first people to be able to say something. It's always the Republicans, and usually it's Trump.
- [15:09]
Scott Galloway
Well, just starting there. So first off, I would like to see the. What committee would it be? We need immediately, in my opinion, to get. Probably not Musk, because I think it would be too much of a spectacle and just bring him more power. It's like one of those villains in a comic book that the more you throw shit at him, he absorbs it and becomes more powerful. But the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee should, in my opinion, have hearings in the tech industry's influence on democracy and its elections. Because there, I think, is now emerging evidence that basically Musk and Yakurino weaponized Twitter, including, creating thousands and thousands of accounts to elevate misinformation and essentially spread just a ton of propaganda misinformation that had a real impact on the election. I'm not sure it's illegal. It's a private company. He can do what he wants with it. But I want her up there to, under oath, to say, yeah, I knew that he was creating thousands of bots pretending to be humans, and we were elevating information or lies, even though we knew they were lies, such that it would influence the outcome of the election. I just want her to go on record saying that so Americans know what they're dealing with, and they have very effectively. Even if it's Umberto Eco, the Italian philosopher, said along the lines of the attention economy, that it's not what you're famous for. It's just about being famous. So say something incendiary. And as long as you're dominating the news cycle, I mean, Republic, I feel like Republicans are dominating 90% of the news cycle right now. And unfortunately, we Have Senator Schumer who brightens up a room by leaving it, just kind of doing nothing or saying nothing. We have Speaker Emerita Pelosi, who just purchased 50 to $100,000 worth of call options on Tempus AI. And when that was disclosed, the company had its best one day performance in history at 35%. So she's spending more time on Robinhood engaging what is effectively insider trading than actually paying attention to real issues. You know, my question is, where the fucking Democrats? I don't agree with a lot of AOC's policies, but at least she's out there. At least she's trying to push back. Where are, where is Senator Klobuchar talking about, you know, antitrust and competition and inflation and talking about how the tenure is surging and that these policies are incredibly inflationary. We have. We're literally fighting fire with fucking squirt guns. And when I say squirt guns, I mean senior leadership in the Democratic Party that is too old, too tame, thinks they're in a PBS drama where they. Good sir, and they like hit them with their glove. I mean, enough already that this is insane that we don't have. I want to see hearings on. Let's immediately have a hearing on this new crypto AI community. And first thing is we need them to come this committee organized by the President. We should have the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to investigate legal implications of Trump's meme coins. I want and bring the new head of this AI and crypto community to explain the Trump and Melania coin. Let's have him go on the record and say, what is this? And is it good for the economy? And we'll be able to invite dozens of the 60,000 people who bought this coin and are now off 70 or 80% in about 72 hours. Instead, we just sort of sit there and give this. Well, it's time to come together. There's things we can work on together. Work on together. We had an immigration bill that the president basically from Mar a Lago killed so he could take credit for it. And we're all sitting around thinking. It reminds me of the movie the Mission. I don't know if you saw that movie with Robert De Niro and Jeremy Irons, but Jeremy Irons plays this, I'm going to call priest a religious figure. And the British are coming basically to slaughter this indigenous community. I don't know if it's Argentinian or Brazilian. They're missionaries anyways. And the priest, Robert De Niro, is trying to get everyone they know they're coming to prepare for war. And the priest says, we're about nonviolence, and they're slaughtered, of course. I just watched a movie called 24, which is about the most famous Norwegian spy of all things. And a woman stands up as he's speaking to this university, saying, why didn't you try nonviolence? I feel like the Democrats have decided to try nonviolence. And I'm like, cersei, I choose violence. This is not working. Sitting around trying to pretend we're taking the higher ground and we're going to work with the president. It hasn't worked, folks. We need to be calling balls and strikes here and saying that. This is when you have the president saying things like polluting blood. And then you have the person who, in my opinion, weaponized a platform to get him elected telling the far right party in Germany, you shouldn't dilute your culture. I mean, this is pre Hitler shit. And yet I don't see a single Democrat with anything resembling a following of social media out there saying fuck all. So, yeah, right now, as far as I can tell, we have one party and another party that thinks they're at cotillion, training their kids to be polite and that peace and love will win out. Thank you for my TED Talk. Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us.
- [20:38]
Jess Katarlov
So a couple of things. Democrats said all the stuff that you just said before the election for months, and voters turned up and said, I don't care. Right. So I care. Millions of people do care. But the pivotal number that 7 million people who voted for Biden in 2020 sat home in 2024. That's how little they cared about what you're just talking about. AOC is out there. She posted before the inauguration. You know, people are asking me why I'm not going to inauguration, and I'm not going to the inauguration of a rapist, to use the term that you use, though I know there's a legal conversation about that, and I'm not looking to have a defamation suit. So AOC is saying stuff like that. She was on Jon Stewart's podcast talking a lot like you were just now. But I feel like for someone like Hakeem Jeffries, who is a very unifying leader, he is trying to figure out, as Nancy Pelosi had to for years, how to manage a caucus that is being pulled in many different directions. Because the difference between what goes on for a safe seat Democrat and a swing seat Democrat is like night and day. And we're gonna Have Congressman Tom Suozzi on for an interview later in the week. Talk to him about this. As he's from a swing district and he was one of the first people out there saying, these are the issues I'll be able to compromise on. We gotta like the Lake and Riley act for immigration. And I'm definitely looking forward to pushing him about the parts of that bill that are definitely not good. Right. In terms of not protecting dreamers and minors. But obviously, you can't affect any change if you're not in office. And if these people want to continue to be reelected so they can even make incremental progress, they're going to have to work with the other side to some degree. It's something like 83% of the American public wants the two sides to work together. And that's why I think, going back to the executive orders and kind of the beginnings of this, like, it is important to look at the list of things and to say, this is stuff that I kind of understand, right? Like if you want to call a national emergency on the southern border, if you want to put more resources down there, I can get on board with that. I completely understand it. All the people who live along the border would tell you that's exactly the kind of conditions that they're living, living in. But the stuff that you have to figure out a way to effectively hold the line, not just rail about it or post about it. You know, he's basically undoing the entire asylum system. I was watching Tom Holman, he was being interviewed about, you know, what happens now to all the people who had their customs and Border Patrol appointments canceled because they got rid of the CBP1 app. And he said, well, go to a port of entry. And. And that the whole point was that you don't want people showing up at port of entries. I mean, there are tens of thousands of people who have been waiting in Mexico, some upwards of a year, to do this the legal way. Also completely forgetting the fact that people who are here illegally do have rights that is enshrined in our Constitution, that they have a right to legal counsel, that they have a right to due process. And the DOJ has new directives. This is one that I thought, this can't be real. Where they're now telling legal service providers who get federal funding not to do their jobs, not to help these immigrants that are here who might have a completely legitimate asylum claim. I already mentioned the DEI offices in the Fairfax County. Sorry, I said Loudoun county before. It's Fairfax County. So that's obviously bad. But then you sprint ahead. Did you see this? That the Department of Defense, because they took down all of their DEI stuff, removed promotional video material about the Tuskegee Airmen.
- [24:29]
Scott Galloway
Yeah. And women in World War II.
- [24:31]
Jess Katarlov
Yeah. The WASPs, which is such a great name for it. And it was Katie Britt from the senator from Alabama who tweeted, oh, this must be a mistake. And within a couple hours, the new Defense Secretary, Pete Hegstath, was like, you know, I've fixed it. But that feels like one of those circumstances where they were trying it on. Right. They thought, well, we could just go ahead and get rid of these things, and if someone catches us, so what? You know, we'll put it back up.
- [24:56]
Scott Galloway
And we're in the news. We're on the news.
- [24:58]
Jess Katarlov
Right. And we're dominating the cycle no matter what. Because, you know, all news is good news or all press is good press, I guess. And that's something that's a credo that Trump has lived by forever. There's also just such a lack of expertise and willingness to want to do the work. Right. They want to eliminate things en masse and not spend the time going through and actually looking at what the relevance is. Like, you know, purging the government of any of those checks. They got rid of, I think, 17 inspector generals, over 12 huge bureaucracies. Right. These are things that you said piss off storied members of the Senate. Like Chuck Grassley lost his mind in 2020 when Trump got rid of two IGs. Now 17 have been removed. Did you see this communication freeze for the NIH and the cdc? Like in the midst of bird flu, they can't tell people what's going on with something. Yeah, exactly. And the foreign aid freeze is just totally frightening.
- [25:57]
Scott Galloway
And we're drawing from the World Health Organization. To your point about sticking our chin out, you know, I believe Biden's first executive order had to do with transgender athletes rights. And it took them three years for an executive order around immigration. To your point, illegal border crossings had dropped to about 45,000 in December of 2024. But in December of 2023, a quarter of a million people came across the border illegally. What I find sort of ironic and telling about these, I don't know what the term is roundups or, you know, when the ICE shows up, they've decided the most efficient place to quote, unqu. Find these unproductive people who are freeloading. Is it workplaces?
- [26:38]
Jess Katarlov
Right.
- [26:38]
Scott Galloway
I thought so. If you wanted to deport Americans, you'd probably go to McDonald's or to their. To their basements where video games are. But with. With undocumented workers, you go to places of work because that's where they are. I thought that was sort of ironic, but we had this coming. We ignored the problem. It got out of control. And just as you can never actually visually spot, got a pendulum at the middle, they have swung. They have taken advantage of this, and they swung back. And quite frankly, I don't have a problem with deportations of undocumented workers. Let's start with those who are in prison. Let's start with those who've now committed two crimes. One crime coming over here, illegal. The second one, I think that's absolutely fair game. The. I mean, some of the other issues that we really screwed up on, we talked about transgender. We took. Took just a. I don't want to say irrelevant, but an issue, and gave them just a free gift with purchase for parents all over the nation who don't want to have their daughters kind of run over the macro. The biggest issue, hands down, in my opinion, is that a mix of identity politics, weaponization by special interest groups essentially had the Democrats implicitly and explicitly turn their backs on the group that has struggled the Most the last 40 years. Everybody feels when young people aren't doing well, their parents, society. And these are the people on social media saying, okay, great, Nvidia is worth $3 trillion. I can't afford rent. So instead of focusing on policies like inflation, how to build more houses, bring down costs, lower, lower enrollment, instead of being weaponized by these universities that are, I mean, essentially some of the most corrupt organizations in the world are seen as the center of democratic politics, specifically my industry. What is more of an epicenter of kind of democratic ideals than elite institutions? Who. I just interviewed the president, Dartmouth. They have an $8 billion endowment and they let in 500 kids. Okay, excuse me. Well, you're not this elite cast enforcer talking about big, big fancy ideals. But you don't want to give people this drug that decreases obesity anxiety, gives them a shot at getting married, making money. No, you'd rather hoard it just for you and your lead friends. So let's create a misdirect of DEI. Michigan University of Michigan has 200 DEI officers. 60% of Harvard's freshman class identifies as non white. But we need to have DEI on campuses such that we can discriminate against what white kids from rural states. I mean, it's just we got so out of control with the identity politics. The DEI apparatus not Focusing on inflation, not focusing on young people that we just gave them a layup to become sort of, you know, just go overboard, flood the zone with a ton of shit. I get it. We deserve it. We had it coming. What I'm really disappointed about is why we're all taking it and calling on people to work together. As far as I'm concerned, it used to be about a certain level of mutual respect. You know, Democrats and Republicans at the end of the day thought, well, if they get in power, I want them to show me some mutual respect. It seems to me like we need to move to mutual destruction and say, look, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Stephen Miller, if you want to start revoking security details, just be careful what you ask for. Because once you're out of office, my guess is you're going to be real fond of a security detail, you know, if you want, I mean, if you want us to stick the DOJ on you after our guy gets in office. But right now we're giving them the impression that if you hit us, we're Gandhi and we believe that peace is going to work here. And I think it's to our disadvantage. I think we come across as total wimps and there's no incentive for them to say, well, maybe we shouldn't be cutting the security detail of General Milley in case our generals that we like are under threat after they leave office. I don't think there's any sense that we'll ever hit back, so to speak. Your thoughts?
- [30:35]
Jess Katarlov
Yeah. To back up your point that I think it's crazy that we had his whole transition knowing exactly who he is, what he's going to do. He's telegraphing it every day. And that we showed up on January 20th at inauguration and did not have a solid message or a plan for countering this.
- [30:58]
Scott Galloway
The Democrats response post inauguration or the complexion, I would for me defines the term flat footed, just on our heels responding, not even responding, just kind of paralyzed, just incredibly encephalitic and not counter punching at all. It feels to me like in terms of the viscosity or strength of the Democratic Party right now, we have. I've never seen us this weak.
- [31:24]
Jess Katarlov
That's a major declaration. I don't know if it's necessarily wrong. I think the right attitude, like Congressman Golden's team has said, we're not gonna respond to everything that Trump does. Cause you can't live in the midst of an outrage cycle constantly. But if we just take it on the chin constantly, I could see voters showing up again in 2026 and just saying, well, what are you about? I still have absolutely no idea. So Hakeem Jeffries really wants to focus in on cost of living issues. And they, the Republicans have put forward all these eos, they have the bill about banning transgender people from athletics, but they, they don't have a cost of living bill. And J.D. vance was on with March Brennan over the weekend and said, well, it takes time to bring prices down when they had told us it would happen on day one. So I think you keep hammering that, but you also need to have a personality and be able to go on a long form podcast and chill with people and talk about other things besides politics. And I'm not seeing that from that many key players in the Democratic Party. Most people, myself included, thought Biden went too far with his preemptive pardons. But he may be vindicated in that in the long term. You know, that these are ruthless people who are, have said in public forums that they're going to come after these folks and that that was actually the right thing to do. I mean, that's a Mitch McConnell move, right? It's not a traditional Joe Biden move to go for the absolute worst case scenario. So, you know, I hope that if Kash Patel gets confirmed, and it looks like he will, because it looks like everybody will, maybe not Tulsi, that he isn't as punitive and as motivated by retribution as he details in his book. But who knows? And I wanted to add to what you were saying about young people. I was talking to a friend of mine whose brother is 30 years old, went on a bachelor party, 13 guys, 10 of 13 voted for Trump. And these were all liberal minded guys, they went to university together. And what we were discussing that I found so interesting, and it links also to the discussion about what's going on with higher education, is that we just are seeing now amongst young people a new definition of what sounds smart. So it used to be, you know, all of your degrees, your level of credibility was directly connected to how fancy the school you went to was, right? Like what kind of job you had, you know, how that you knew which fork went with which, right? Like going back to the pretty woman scene, right? Slippery little suckers, right? Like that. That was what low class looked like. And high class looks like someone who dedicates their life to public service, but also has a trust fund that they're relying on and went to Harvard for everything. And now the people that are revered or that folks think are smart are the ones who are asking Questions incessantly. And it doesn't matter what they're questioning, like rfk. Well, I'm just asking questions, right? About the measles vaccine or fluoride in the water or whatever it is that day. And the right has weaponized that against us to an incredible advantage. Because all of these young people who are smart and very well educated now think that it is cool and forward thinking and what they want to see in leadership for people to not actually know the answers to questions. And I don't know how you rectify that, because, you know, I talk to my toddler, and she's asking questions all the time, right? Like, but why, Mom? Mommy, why? Why do we do this? Why are you going here? Why do I have to brush my teeth? Why do I have to make my bed? And then you fast forward to where she'll be in 25, 30 years. Let's say, is she gonna think Joe Rogan is the smartest person in the world because he's just asking questions. I mean, even Lex Friedman, someone who's a very traditionally smart person, right, in terms of education and productivity, is just asking questions. Like asking Zelensky, why don't you just give up your country? And that's what passes now as the folks that we should be looking up to. And that's leading to a set of government officials who are also doing that same thing, who are just flooding the zone with wild questions that then leave them with this route that they can go through to. To throw all of this administrative shit at the wall, and we're ending up with a government that I'm sure will be in complete crisis in a matter of months.
- [35:55]
Scott Galloway
Yeah, it's definitely. I mean, we say this a bunch, that we're sort of in unchartered territory. It seemed like I'm just. You said something that sort of, I don't know, piqued my interest. Because you know more about this than I do, but that you believe Cash Patel will be confirmed and that there's a chance that Tulsi Gabbard won't be. And I would have reversed that, but I don't know the latest. What's going on there.
- [36:19]
Jess Katarlov
Well, what's going on is. I mean, you saw Pete Hagsass go through. So there were three no votes on that. It was quite clear that Senator Tillis did want to vote against him because he required Hagsass to write a letter to him answering specific questions about accusations of abuse against his second wife. There was a big New York Times piece about this. And you can see even on Joni Ernst's face that she didn't want to do this. But when you're threatened with a primary and probably with violence, knowing how the Internet works, you do those things. The reason that I say that I think it's possible Tulsi doesn't get confirmed. Lindsey Graham over the weekend wouldn't answer. Right. And how he was voting on it. And I feel like if there is anyone who's not gonna get through, it's the one that people are being the quietest about. And no one really talks about Tulsi Gabbard. They're talking about the other ones. I think it's feasible that Republicans decide that RFK Jr. Is not actually a threat to vaccines or whatever and let him through. But it seems like they're advertising, having good meetings with Cash Patel. And I haven't seen, you know, one thumbs up MAGA post with people standing with Tulsi Gabbard, so. But I'm prepared for all of it to get through.
- [37:37]
Scott Galloway
True. I love. Someone said that Mitch McConnell voting against Hegseth would be like Hannibal Lecter going vegetarian on his deathbed. It's just like, don't, don't, don't hold your breath. But, yeah, it's, it's.
- [37:52]
Jess Katarlov
He did it.
- [37:53]
Scott Galloway
Yeah. Again, he, you know, he's got very little to lose at this point. Right. He's totally, he's leaving. He's old.
- [38:01]
Jess Katarlov
I mean, profiles encourage though, right, that. But you're doing it and then nothing really to show for it. But, you know, I guess I appreciate.
- [38:11]
Scott Galloway
It anyway, but you think Cash Patel's gonna get through? That's, that's super interesting.
- [38:15]
Jess Katarlov
Right now. I don't, you know, who knows? But it looks likely. And people seem to be thinking that Donald Trump is entitled to whatever he wants in terms of a cabinet. And, and usually people do get what they want. There have been cases where it hasn't happened, but they strong arm everyone and they have this fleet of people online just threatening anyone who opposes them, including, you know, members of their family will do things like that, whether that is a sitting elected representative or the president of another country. Like this game that went on with the Colombians about using military planes versus the regular detention planes. I mean, first of all, costs three times more. They can get up to $852,000 to send back migrants on these C130s, I think, or C17s.
- [39:11]
Scott Galloway
It's all about branding. Right.
- [39:13]
Jess Katarlov
So it's just like a huge. It's all the show. And CNN was reporting this morning that they want all of the ICE agents to be wearing their vests and for this to be made for tv because we're in the Truman Show. But like a really bad version.
- [39:28]
Scott Galloway
I've sent him on JetBlue. Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us. Welcome back. Before we wrap, we gotta address something we've been hearing from some of you. Apparently, there's a feeling that we're not quite living up to the moderate in our show name. Maybe we're leaning a bit more into the raging side. People say we're more raging than moderate. That's a fair point. So what does being a moderate really mean to us, especially during this new administration? Jess, you kick us off. What do you think it means to be a moderate? It.
- [39:59]
Jess Katarlov
Well, first, the fact that we're talking about this is your fault because you made me a comments monster. And I went and looked at what people were saying and there's a lot of positive stuff.
- [40:11]
Scott Galloway
But, oh, don't look at the comments. I mean, read the first five, learn from it and then ignore it. Just your own mental health.
- [40:18]
Jess Katarlov
I stay up later than everyone in my household so I could spend a good amount of time comments doom scrolling. But seeing a lot of this like, this is not what a moderate means. And I am completely willing to accept that a. A moderate means different things to different people. And that also I think of myself as a liberal moderate, not someone who is a swing voter at this point. And most people who advertise that are lying. Cause there's usually a crucial issue that puts you into one camp or the other. For a lot of people, it's whether you're pro choice or pro life. And as a pro choice person, I would be hard pressed to support a candidate that was pro life. But I guess I wanted to talk about this because I think what we share and why we wanted to do this specific podcast together under this name is because we want to talk about politics through the framework of pragmatism, not just optimism or what we want to happen. And that it's important to have political discussions that are cognizant of the guardrails of the way government actually operates. And also I think, most crucially, understanding that the framework of a partisan worldview is not how the general populace operates. And the 2024 results were so indicative of that transformation that people are not interested in backing a team in the same way. If anything, they're backing Trump because they back that player. Right? Like that's their favorite football player or their favorite basketball player or whatever sport they're into. And. And I think that being a moderate right now is trying, as per our earlier discussion, to see the good in what the other side may be bringing to the table and saying, like, sure, that works for me. And also, I have constituents or I have people that I know who absolutely feel that way, recognizing the faults of the party that we both belong to, and then trying to find a way to constructively and effectively push back where we need to. And that's how I see it right now. How do you see it? Well, even though you said earlier you're not in moderate, so the podcast is over.
- [42:38]
Scott Galloway
I would define myself as ground center, as kind of ground zero for moderates. And that is, as far as I can tell, moderates are basically people that everybody hates. And essentially, I mean, the generous or the actual Webster definition would be someone who has. Has tempered views and is somewhere in the middle on the political spectrum. And the way I see it is I've tried, as I've gotten older, to not be lazy and sign up for any political orthodoxy. When I hear something crazy on the left, I like to call it out. When I think our Democratic leadership is too inefficient, feckless, cowardly. I call it out. When I think DEI is out of control, when I think that immigration is out of control, when I think that Social Security spending is out of control, some of their favorite policies of the left, I call it out. And when I am ambiguously pro Israel, it's like, I don't bark up any one tree. I try to have my own views in this environment based on where the political spectrum is. I'm now seen as center left. In the 70s, I would have been a Rockefeller Republican. That just would have been. I would have been in that party. But I think it's also just saying, look, I'm going to look at. I'm going to be a critical thinker. I'm going to look at issue by issue. And regardless of the political orthodoxy you're supposed to sign up to, you say, okay, I'm not down with this. And it's almost like you become. Unfortunately, to a certain extent, the left is much harsher on moderates. They treat you like an apostate. Scott, I thought we could trust you. People from the Biden campaign sign up. Don't you understand the assignments? Sign up. Well, no, he's too fucking old. What are we doing here? And then people on the right are just like, kind of write you off as a libtard, but they don't come after you the same way the left does when they thought you were, quote, unquote, when we thought you were one of us. So I see a moderate as someone who says, okay, I'm going to go issue by issue. I'm going to use critical thinking. I'm going to be unafraid to say this makes no sense, regardless of the culture dynamics of pressure to sign up for the full orthodoxy and narrative. Because when the narrative gets crazy or makes no sense, you say, okay, I don't buy this. I don't have a problem with deporting criminals. I get the symbolism of it. I don't have a problem with a surge of troops at the border. Fine, deficits. Anyways, my point is, I'd like to think a moderate is someone who says, I'm a critical thinker. I'm going to look at the issues and I'm going to decide one by one what I think is the right view on this. I'm not going to sign up and just say, okay, I'm a fan, I'm a cultist, no matter what they say. And this is true of both the left and the right. But I will say, as someone who's seen or identified as a Democrat, that I get more hate from the left than I do from the right. The right has just kind of written me off. And that's how it is in our society. You got to pick a side. You can't say, well, I want to go issue by issue. Issue. Right. Do I believe women should have the right to terminate a pregnancy? Yes. In the third trimester. Okay, that's worth a discussion. Right? If. If the woman's health or the baby's health is not, you know, in. In danger. At the same time, nobody trusts each other, so nobody wants to have anything resembling kind of a, you know, a moderate conversation. In addition, with Citizens United and gerrymandering, that has hard right and hard left districts. There's no political room for moderates anymore. They can't get elected. Right. Because basically every election now with these hard blue and hard red districts is decided in the primary. So it's basically who can be craziest, who can be more crazy left, or who can be more crazy. Right? And a moderate is just a recipe for not getting elected. So I think in the media, or as a commentator or quote on whatever you want to call yourself, a thought leader, I think it's especially important that we demonstrate it's okay to be a critical thinker and occasionally have your followers on threads or blue sky come after you because you say, yeah, I don't get this democratic policy. I think the vice president was a great senator. I think she made a great Supreme Court justice. I don't know if she'd be a great president. And then everyone comes for you. And I'm not willing to sign up and blind, you know, bend the knee for see above an insurrectionist and a rapist. Critical thinking. Look at every person, look at every issue and decide where you are on it. Anyways, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. Jess.
- [47:13]
Jess Katarlov
No, I think that's the right story. And I think that there's so much pressure to always be a good soldier. I certainly feel this in my role, you know, being part of the conservative media ecosystem, that there are liberals who get enraged if I even say, well, this doesn't make a ton of sense, or this is an issue that 70% of Americans agree on. Like, why can't that just be our position? It seems pretty normal. Like, you know, the. Was it Prop 36 on the California ballot making it not okay to shoplift up to $950 without getting arrested? Like, these are just obvious things and you should be able to have opinions about them without people flipping out on you. But I do think a critical component of how we approach politics and how people who are governing more in the middle do is that they fundamentally understand that it's not the intentions that matter, it's the outcomes that matter. And we just had an enormous outcomes election where people said that governance in blue cities and states is not meeting the moment, far from it. That riding the subway is not a good option anymore, that we don't support law enforcement, that we have people who are incompetent, perhaps corrupt in big positions of power, and that we are not living up to the covenant that our elected officials make with the people who send them there, and that we're actually failing ourselves when it comes to our values because of how poor that governance has gotten. And that's really crucial to how I think about politics and how I think about my advocacy for policies that I think will improve quality of life. And more often than not, those policies are linked to more liberal legislators or people who see the world through a similar prism to me. But I am completely open to the fact that there are are good representatives from the other side of the aisle that also live by those ideals or certainly can meet us somewhere in the middle to get something good done. And I remember when the Democrats were funding MAGA candidates to run against moderate Republicans and I understood it from a, you know, we got a win perspective. But it was upsetting to me that good people like Peter Mayer in Michigan lost his seat because we put in tons of money to back a crazy person that would then go on to lose to the Democrat. And I think that those are the kinds of things that we need to explore because we're only gonna have a healthy political system if we do have two thriving parties, Right, that are full of people that actually capture the cultural and political zeitgeist of the country. And the extremes on both sides are wildly dangerous. I think that the right more dangerous than the left. But when you look at what people think and how they're talking about the issues, you know, that the Marjorie Taylor Greene's of the world are not appealing to the general population writ large, and that for some, like the Ilan Omars or the Rashida Talib's of the world are not appealing to them either. And so I think it's important to be trying to stake out ground, to have these discussions about it to, to, you know, bring people on from the other side of the aisle or people who work regularly with Republicans so that we can hear about how progress can actually be made. Because they're the ones, we can talk all we want from our studios, but they're the ones actually casting the votes for all of this and hopefully making a big difference in people's lives.
- [51:08]
Scott Galloway
Yeah. Something I think the Republicans have done much better than Democrats. And your buddy Tim Miller, I thought, made a great point on, on from the Bulwark podcast, that the kind of the coarseness and the, I don't know, just the provocative, sometimes stupid, sometimes weirdness that's come out of the right. It came across as authentic. Whereas Democrats, it's as if they're reading off a press release or believe that they're crossing the Delaware or giving an inauguration speech. I mean, they're just so, like. It's like, speak like a regular person, for God's sakes. And the Republicans do that better than Democrats. Also, it strikes me that a big component in terms of what impacts people's lives and gives them the impression of the. Of the respective brands. We have to get our shit together around on the ground running some of these Democratic cities. A bunch of my friends lost houses in the Pacific Palisades, and they basically all said the same thing, though. I, like, I keep hearing these excuses for why the reservoirs weren't full, the water pressure was down, whatever it is. And he's like, we pay 13% a year. In additional taxes. If I'm going to have my house burned down, I'll move to Florida or Texas where I pay 0%. It's like we should have the super sized gold plated VIP, you know, a white glove government when you're paying 13%. And instead some of the highest tax, highest tax states are offering American. I mean, they're expensive but bad, which isn't a recipe for a good product. And the most expensive but bad metros right now are governed by Democrats who seem to be weaponized by unions or whatever it might be, special interest groups and are just taxing the shit out of their local residents and doing head up your ass, you know, enforcement like you were talking about, where if you steal less than $900, they don't even prosecute you. So I think until. And by the way, I don't think that's true of New York. New York has 12. I think it's a total of about 12 or 13% also in taxes. But I would argue Manhattan is worth it. I think it's actually. I think Manhattan is well run. And I don't know about you, but I do feel that the subway feels a little bit different. I've noticed that. More aware.
- [53:29]
Jess Katarlov
That's an understatement.
- [53:30]
Scott Galloway
Yeah. You really feel it, don't you?
- [53:33]
Jess Katarlov
Well, I do personally, but I don't remember. I grew up here and have ridden the subway my whole life. The number of people being like thrown in front of cars, being punched, slashed, a woman burned on the F train. That's not normal. Oh, things happen every once in a while. And Kathy Hochul's definitely getting the message because of Richie Torres. But it's bad. Bad.
- [53:59]
Scott Galloway
Yeah. And also I just. In terms of crime, I think it's.
- [54:03]
Jess Katarlov
Crime is down. But those are also to the point about the messaging of this no one. If they feel less safe and you come at them with a bunch of statistics, it doesn't matter if I don't.
- [54:15]
Scott Galloway
Feel safe on the subway. If I can't have my AirPods in because I need to, I have to feel like I'm more aware. All right, that's all for this episode. Joss. Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates. Our producers are David Toledo and Chinenye Onike. Our technical director is Drew Burrows. You can find Raging Moderates on its own feed every Tuesday. That's right, Raging Moderates on its own feed. Please follow us wherever you get your podcasts. Jess, Have a great rest of the week.
- [54:39]
Jess Katarlov
You too, Scott.
- [54:41]
Scott Galloway
Thank you.