Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway & Jessica Tarlov
Episode: Why the Manosphere Is Breaking up With Trump
Date: October 8, 2025
Host: Vox Media Podcast Network
Episode Overview
In this episode, Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov deliver their trademark centrist commentary on three high-stakes topics: the Trump administration's controversial deployment of National Guard troops to liberal cities, progress and stumbling blocks in Gaza ceasefire talks, and a surprising turn in American political culture—the manosphere's growing disillusionment with Donald Trump. Through lively dialogue, candid personal takes, and real-time political analysis, they connect the dots between voter attitudes, social movements, and digital power brokers shaping the upcoming 2026 elections.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Trump’s National Guard Deployments and the Legal, Political, and Social Fallout
[03:20 – 14:37]
- Summary of Events:
Trump’s administration faces lawsuits from Illinois and Oregon regarding its attempts to send National Guard troops to Democratic cities like Chicago and Portland. A federal judge blocked the deployment in Portland, calling the rationale “untethered to the facts.” - Voter Backlash:
Scott highlights that “most voters disapprove of the Guard deployments” and wonders whether the tactic will blow back on Trump’s political position. - Jessica’s Analysis:
- Argues the real question is about the deeper political ramifications—are the Republicans risking their midterm majority or triggering national outrage?
- Not enough “tangible events” or mass protests are emerging in response, implying widespread disillusionment or acceptance of the overreach.
- Example from Chicago where public filming and collective pushback made ICE officers abandon an arrest, showing localized resistance but limited national momentum.
- She’s frustrated that “the politics of how the American populace writ large responds to an authoritarian power grab by the Trump administration has not been severe enough for me.” (05:55 – Jessica)
- Scott Unpacks the Paradox:
- Emphasizes the economic importance of undocumented workers and the hypocrisy in political messaging.
- “They call them undocumented workers. These people have documents like no tomorrow. They have phone contracts. They have driver's licenses… these are the people that have been wiping grandma's ass such that you can afford to keep her at home.” (06:22 – Scott)
- Describes a chilling, unhealthy atmosphere for immigrants and even naturalized citizens, sharing a story from a high-profile anchor whose American-citizen partner now fears being mistakenly targeted.
- Criticizes the misallocation of military resources: “I like using our troops aggressively… But instead of deploying troops to Portland, shouldn't we be figuring out a peacekeeping force in Gaza?” (09:13 – Scott)
- Jessica on Rights Abuses:
- Cites lawsuits over wrongful detention of citizens, militarized raids in Chicago, and general disregard for civil rights, seeing “a complete infringement on your constitutional rights that they can just show up and haul you out of your bed.” (11:06 – Jessica)
- Skewers the administration’s priorities, moving resources away from fighting genuine organized crime toward mass immigrant arrests for political optics.
- Asserts that Stephen Miller and Russ Vought are “running the ship” in the Trump administration, with Trump himself “not the one running this ship ... He has no exposure to the realities on the ground.” (12:39 – Jessica)
- Scott’s Hard Economic Take:
- Less sympathetic toward farmers hurt by tariffs and global supply chain shifts: “Quite frankly, what did you think you were gonna get anyways with that ugly, Why'd you have to inject reality into my little soybean rant?” (14:39 – Scott)
Notable Quote
“But the politics of how the American populace writ large responds to an authoritarian power grab by the Trump administration has not been severe enough for me.”
—Jessica Tarlov, 05:55
2. Ceasefire Talks in Gaza – Hope and Realism
[17:28 – 36:03]
- Anniversary Context:
Jessica opens with somber reflections on the two-year anniversary of October 7th:
“It's the two year anniversary of that horrific terrorist attack that killed nearly 1,200 Israelis … it's reported 60,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 169,000 have been injured.” (17:29 – Jessica) - Ceasefire Negotiations:
- Talks underway in Egypt, with U.S., Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey mediating a Trump-backed ceasefire plan.
- Jessica is “optimistic” because Qatar’s involvement is essential: “Without Qatar, Hamas cannot exist.”
- Cites campus activism and memorials at Columbia University as examples of shifting U.S. attitudes.
- Scott’s Skepticism:
- Casts doubt on Trump’s bluster and effectiveness: “We’re really starting to see and pay the price for threats that have absolutely no veracity anymore … these deadlines no one takes seriously anymore.” (19:30 – Scott)
- Points out the dealbreaker in these negotiations: “While Hamas agreed to certain points, they refused or disagreed on certain points, including a requirement that they disarm. If Hamas isn’t willing to lay down their weapons, then I don’t see how this gets done at all.” (19:54 – Scott)
- Worries both about Trump’s lack of diplomatic patience and about Netanyahu’s self-serving motivations.
- Jessica on Hostage Deal Details:
- Breaks down likely terms: 20 hostages alive, 25 deceased; in exchange, Israel releases 250 Palestinian prisoners and 1,700 Gazans. Remains-for-remains provisions included.
- Notes that hostage families seem “hopeful for the first time since kind of in the immediate aftermath of all of this.”
- Acknowledges Trump’s penchant for drama might work in favor of a breakthrough: “If it makes him feel super powerful ... and that results in Ukraine not having to cede as much territory as Zelensky is even willing to, or that these hostages come back ... then count me in.” (25:58 – Jessica)
- Scott’s Counterpoint:
- Explains why businesspeople like Trump are ill-suited for political negotiations: “Business brings forward very rational actors … politics is totally different,” dealing with reelections, ideology, and bureaucracy.
- Trump’s decision-making style is “whoever speaks to him last is the strategy.”
- Outlines the plan in detail and underscores the deteriorating U.S. public support for Israel’s war effort.
- Warns: “If Israel doesn’t quickly figure out a way to take back the mantle as the good guys, we won’t survive... We are vastly outnumbered and the only way we survive is to punch above our weight class, not only militarily... but from a position of the moral high ground.” (32:35 – Scott)
- Jessica on U.S. Political Shifts:
- Observes that the pro-Israel position is eroding among young Americans and Democrats; “Gen Z has no affection whatsoever for Israel, isn’t trying to justify October 7, but is much more concerned in what has happened October 8 onwards.” (34:15 – Jessica)
Memorable Moment
"If Israel doesn’t quickly figure out a way to take back the mantle as the good guys, we won’t survive... The only way we survive is to punch above our weight class, not only militarily... but from a position of the moral high ground."
—Scott Galloway, 32:35
3. The Manosphere’s Break-Up With Trump
[36:06 – 46:14]
- The Shift:
Scott summarizes: “The same space that helped fuel Trump’s rise is now showing signs of buyer’s remorse.” Popular creators like Aiden Ross, Andrew Schultz, Joe Rogan, and Theo Vaughn are publicly distancing themselves from Trump, citing disappointment and reputational risk. - Jessica’s Critical Take:
- “With great power comes great responsibility … if you are sitting down with the guy who was the president … you have to take that very seriously.”
- Finds it disingenuous for these influencers to be shocked at Trump’s actions: “Were you paying any attention to what his campaign was predicated on? … There is very little that has occurred [that isn’t in] a literal playbook.”
- “You’re shocked that he’s rounding up people at Home Depot. Like, give me a break.” (38:37 – Jessica)
- Scott on Digital Influence:
- Warns Democrats to stop dismissing “imperfect allies,” arguing that the left is “too quick to treat everyone that doesn't sign up for the exact same fucking narrative in hardcore orthodoxy as an apostate.”
- Breaks down the digital power shift: exposure on Rogan “was equivalent to three hours a night of primetime cable across all three major networks for two weeks.”
- Stresses, “Podcasts… just fucking figure it out… mics everywhere…get on as many podcasts as possible because that’s the fertile ground.” (44:13 – Scott)
- Aligns manosphere podcasters with the “swing voter that is a young male who votes on economic issues.”
- Broader Implications:
- Suggests Democrats need to “bear hug” these new digital power brokers if they want to have electoral relevance.
- Jessica remains skeptical that Democratic politicians fit the “good hang” requirement these influencers want.
- Scott jokes: “We’re bringing the D and D. We’re making Democratic sexy again. I’m going to start wearing…a little bit of midriff on this pod.” (45:57 – Scott)
Notable Quote
“The exposure Trump got on Rogan was equivalent to three hours a night of primetime cable across all three major networks for two weeks.”
—Scott Galloway, 43:15
Key Quotes & Timestamps
- Jessica Tarlov:
- "The politics of how the American populace writ large responds to an authoritarian power grab… has not been severe enough for me." (05:55)
- "Gen Z has no affection whatsoever for Israel, isn’t trying to justify October 7, but is much more concerned in what has happened October 8 onwards." (34:15)
- Scott Galloway:
- "These are the people that have been wiping grandma's ass such that you can afford to keep her at home…" (06:22)
- "If Israel doesn’t quickly figure out a way to take back the mantle as the good guys, we won’t survive..." (32:35)
- "Podcasts… just fucking figure it out…get on as many podcasts as possible because that’s the fertile ground." (44:13)
- "The exposure Trump got on Rogan was equivalent to three hours a night of primetime cable across all three major networks for two weeks." (43:15)
Conclusion
This lively episode tackles heavy issues—executive overreach, systemic failures in peace negotiations, and the wild power shift in media and politics—with the clarity and irreverence Raging Moderates is known for. Galloway and Tarlov challenge each other's assumptions, share both alarm and hope about where the country is headed, and launch a biting, essential critique of political and digital culture heading into the next election cycle.
[Listen to this episode for a truly centrist, unsparing, and entertaining fact check of who's really steering American politics in 2025.]
