Human Events with Jack Posobiec, February 27th, 2026

Summary

Human Events with Jack Posobiec – February 27, 2026 (Aired February 28, 2026)

Podcast: Real America’s Voice | Host: Jack Posobiec | Guests: Will Chamberlain, Darren Selnick

---

Episode Overview

In this episode of Human Events, Jack Posobiec delivers his signature rapid-fire analysis on several major stories shaping American politics and foreign policy. The episode begins with commentary on Bill Clinton's closed-door testimony regarding connections with Jeffrey Epstein, pivots to a detailed discussion of the Tyler Robinson case (the murder of political commentator Charlie Kirk), and later evaluates breaking news about U.S.-Iran tensions and the evolving global strategic environment. Jack reads and reacts to listener feedback on U.S. military action in Iran, synthesizing grassroots conservative sentiment on war, foreign policy, and the state of the American nation.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Bill Clinton’s Epstein Testimony and Elite Accountability

[02:56–09:22]

• Bill Clinton Testifies on Epstein:
  Jack covers former President Clinton’s closed-door hearing before House lawmakers, focusing on Epstein's claims of involvement in founding the Clinton Foundation and Clinton's frequent contacts with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
  • “Bill Clinton, former President of the United States, testifies in front of a hearing behind closed doors. We're told that in that hearing he gave an opening statement and claimed that he did nothing wrong and he saw nothing.” (Jack Posobiec, 05:00)
• Refusal to Take Responsibility:
  Jack expresses deep skepticism at Clinton’s claims of ignorance and insists accountability is needed for elite complicity in Epstein’s crimes:
  • “What we are left with, unfortunately, is more questions about why it is...the Clintons...didn't push for pushing all this information out in the first place?” (07:42)
• Contrast with Trump’s Actions:
  Posobiec draws a pointed contrast between how Trump distanced himself from Epstein ("kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago") and the Clintons' apparent inaction.
  • “Donald Trump went and did that and he was the one who came out there and called the police as far back as, what was it, 2006?” (08:08)

2. The Tyler Robinson Case: Legal Analysis and Justice System Commentary

[14:10–31:57]
With guest Will Chamberlain (Article III Project)

• Conflict of Interest Motion:
  Jack and Will discuss the latest hearing in the case of Tyler Robinson, charged with the murder of Charlie Kirk. A defense motion tried (and failed) to disqualify the Utah prosecutors due to a tangential family connection.
  • Will Chamberlain explains why true conflicts of interest must involve “self-dealing” distinct from the public's interest, which was absent here. (16:31)
• Role of Prosecutors and Justice:
  Both express satisfaction with the judge’s articulation: the prosecutor's duty lies in protecting public justice, not personal interest.
  • “Sometimes justice for serious crimes is serious punishment and to seek the maximum punishment under the law.” (Will Chamberlain, 17:16)
• Physical Evidence & Family Testimony:
  The podcast details evidence against Robinson (DNA, ballistics, eyewitness accounts) and expands on his parents’ harrowing decision to turn him in after recognizing his grandfather’s rifle in evidence photos.
  • “You have to place him with the weapon, his hands. So he is there. He does have the means, motive, and opportunity to be able to commit the crime.” (Jack Posobiec, 21:13)
  • “Why would parents turn their child in if they didn't think he had done it?” (Will Chamberlain, 26:20)
• Civilization and Justice Values:
  Jack and Will reflect emotionally on the gut-wrenching parental decision, framing it as the highest order of “first world behavior.”
  • “That's ‘first world behavior, yes. Of the highest order. First world behavior’” (Jack Posobiec & Will Chamberlain, 28:00)

3. Breaking News: Clinton-Epstein and U.S.-Iran Tensions

[32:32–37:50]

• Clinton's Under-Oath Exoneration of Trump:
  Jack reports breaking claims that Clinton, under oath, affirmed Trump’s lack of involvement with Epstein, stressing this should “finally put questions to rest."
  • “Even Bill Clinton himself is saying that Trump was not involved with Epstein...Even still, he is coming up and saying that Donald Trump, not involved with Jeffrey Epstein...” (Jack Posobiec, 32:32)
• Escalating Situation with Iran:
  Jack describes U.S. military forces' deployment in the Middle East amidst potential strikes on Iran and the concurrent evacuation of non-essential personnel from Israel.
• Chinese Satellite Imagery and Information Warfare:
  The episode highlights China’s public release of high-resolution imagery of U.S. military assets, calling it a new front in “information warfare.”
  • “This is imagery at a level...that you would not normally see in an unclassified open source environment.” (Jack Posobiec, 35:00)

4. U.S. Military, Presidential Process, and Foreign Policy Principles

[37:50–43:10]
With guest Darren Selnick (former Deputy Chief of Staff, Secretary of War)

• China’s Strategic Threat:
  Selnick identifies China as America’s primary future threat and addresses the implications of their information capabilities.
• Trump’s Decision-Making on Iran:
  Both Jack and Selnick stress that President Trump is carefully weighing military options regarding Iran, avoiding hasty decisions—preferring “strategic ambiguity.”
  • “The president will pick the option that will do the, my guess, the least amount of, you know, strength that they need, use the appropriate force that you need to get the appropriate outcome.” (Darren Selnick, 39:14)
• Trump’s Statement (clip):
  “It'd be wonderful if they negotiate really in good conscience...But they...are not getting there so far...” (President Trump, 41:24)

5. Audience Feedback: Should the U.S. Attack Iran?

[43:19–53:08]

• Email Survey (“Question of the Day”):
  Posobiec reads listener emails of varying ages regarding potential U.S. military action in Iran—most express deep skepticism or outright opposition to regime change, citing campaign promises (“no new wars”), costs, uncertainty, and the long list of U.S. regime-change failures (Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine).
  • “Any clean snatch and grab is one belt-fed burst away from a downed aircraft and dead Americans. We got lucky in Venezuela...Iran is not Venezuela.” (Michael, 37, 44:44)
  • “I support strikes on Iran if, especially if they are surgical and precise and effective. Stop Iran from going nuclear and stop the suffering of the Iranian people.” (Allah, 40, 44:44)
  • “Going to war with Iran is a catastrophic mistake and a betrayal of the campaign promises that President Trump ran on and I supported for three election cycles. We need to be America first.” (Lool, 26, 44:44)
  • “We need to do something about immigration. We need to take the fight to them.” (Blake, 31, 52:30)
• Key Trends:
  • Older listeners recall the human cost and unpredictability of regime change.
  • Younger respondents emphasize debt, domestic priorities, and a call for “America First.”
  • Widespread distrust in elite motives, with some referencing Epstein conspiracies and U.S. corruption.
• Jack’s Position:
  Jack reiterates his opposition to prolonged or regime change wars in Iran, affirming support only for limited, precise strikes if absolutely necessary.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Clinton and Epstein:
  • “We've seen the pictures, Bill. We've seen them. We have pictures of you with women on Epstein's plane. There are pictures of you with Ghislaine Maxwell, the recruiter for Epstein, swimming around. We've got pictures of you in a hot tub with redacted women...not good stuff.”
    — Jack Posobiec (06:21)
• On American Justice Values:
  • “That's first world behavior, yes. Of the highest order. The highest order. First world behavior, yeah.”
    — Jack Posobiec (28:00)
• On the Cost of War:
  • “Any clean snatch and grab is one belt-fed burst away from a downed aircraft and dead Americans.”
    — Listener Michael, 37 (44:44)
• On Parental Pain:
  • “Knowing that...whatever life you had, whatever hopes and dreams you had for your child, it's all going to be gone after you pick up that call, you pick up that phone. It's all gone.”
    — Jack Posobiec (27:45)
• On Foreign Policy Wisdom:
  • “Ultimately, this idea that we're going to go in and knock off the, the ayatollah and the mullahs and just get the best government we want, I just, I think it's folly. Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine. It happens again and again and again and it never seems to work.”
    — Jack Posobiec (44:44)

---

Important Segment Timestamps

• Clinton-Epstein Testimony: 02:56–09:22
• Analysis of Tyler Robinson Case (with Will Chamberlain): 14:10–31:57
• Breaking: Clinton Deposition & U.S.-Iran/China Tech: 32:32–37:50
• U.S.-Iran Strategy & Chinese Info Warfare (with Darren Selnick): 37:50–43:10
• Audience Emails & Military Action in Iran: 43:19–53:08

---

Tone and Style

• Language: Blunt, confrontational, emotive, skeptical of elites; “America First” populism; conversational but data-driven when discussing evidence.
• Mood: Intense, urgent, but engaging and open to listener participation.

---

Summary

This episode blends hard-hitting exposition on elite unaccountability (Epstein-Clinton), legal system integrity, the somber realities of crime and justice, and the high-stakes chessboard of 2026 geopolitics. Jack Posobiec probes beneath the headlines, leveraging expert guests and audience voices to challenge government narratives, critique both left and right, and present a platform for skeptical, patriotic conservatism. The show culminates in a people-centric review of foreign policy, capturing the raw skepticism Americans feel about new wars, squandered trust, and their hope for honest leadership in perilous times.

Transcript

[Jack Posobiec]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Guaranteed Human support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc, SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures [e-mail]

[Jack Posobiec]

I think when you're diagnosed with cancer you crave a semblance of normalcy and control and so work allowed me to be me. So I think it's really important that companies stay flexible. Cancer in a diagnosis can be all consuming, but it doesn't have to be. Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place for healing. Learn more and sign the [e-mail] it's so weird.

[Public Ad Announcer]

This app shows that my credit score

[Jack Posobiec]

is pretty good, but I couldn't get the car loan.

[MyFICO Advertiser]

Are you using myfico.com?

[Jack Posobiec]

no, it's some other company.

[MyFICO Advertiser]

Oh, you should get a MyFICO account instead. FICO scores are the ones used by 90% of lenders and other credit scores can vary up to 100 points.

[Public Ad Announcer]

That would have been helpful yesterday.

[Jack Posobiec]

Get the scores lenders use.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Get the right FICO credit score for your credit goal, including your FICO scores used for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. Visit myfico.com or download download the MyFico app to get started today.

[MyFICO Advertiser]

A fresh financial you is closer than you think. With myfico you can get the right score for your credit goal, including your FICO scores used for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. MyFICO provides your FICO score straight from the people that created it. And you can compare your FICO scores and credit reports from all three bureaus, Experian, TransUnion and Equifax, side by side. Understanding your credit has never been easier, so use MyFico to get a clearer picture of your credit in 2026. Visit MyFico.com or download the MyFico app to started today,

[Jack Posobiec]

This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.

[MyFICO Advertiser]

A commentator, international social media sensation and former Navy Intelligence veteran, this is Human

[Jack Posobiec]

Events with your host Jack Posobic. Christ is King Netflix said it is declining to raise its offer for the purchase of Warner Brothers Studios and HBO following the Warner Brothers Discovery Board's determination that Paramount has submitted a superior offer. According to Warner Brothers Discoveries Board, a third victim has died following that deadly shooting at a youth hockey game in Rhode Island. Gerald Dorgan was in critical condition for more than a week. His daughter Rhonda, who was the ex wife of the shooter, and their son Aiden were also killed in the shooting. The shooter was identified as Robert Dorgan, who also went by the names Roberta Esposito and Roberta Dorgano. This is a US embassy Jerusalem Post, it reads. On February 27, 2026, the Department of State authorized the departure of non emergency U.S. government personnel and family members of U.S. government personnel from Mission Israel due to safety risks. The US Embassy in Israel says the

[MyFICO Advertiser]

State Department has authorized non essential personnel and their families to leave the country to because of quote, safety risks and

[Jack Posobiec]

with the looming possibility of a strike on Iran, the staff that want to leave are encouraged to go while commercial flights are still available. Republicans have now set a new precedent which is to bring in presidents and former presidents to testify. So we're once again going to make that call that we did yesterday. We are now asking and demanding that President Trump officially come in and testify in front of the Oversight Committee to hear from the 42nd president to publicly address his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. All as Hillary Clinton denies any knowledge of Epstein's crimes after her meeting with Republicans, I answered every one of their questions as fully as I could based

[MyFICO Advertiser]

on what I knew.

[Jack Posobiec]

And what I knew is what I said in my statement this morning. I never met Jeffrey Epstein, never had

[Will Chamberlain]

any

[Jack Posobiec]

connection or communication with him. I knew Ghislaine Maxwell casually as an acquaintance. Today, former President Bill Clinton takes the hot seat as House lawmakers probe for answers about the nature of his ties to late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily we're here live real America's voice. Today is the 27th of February, 2026. Anno Domini. Bill Clinton, former President of the United States, testifies in front of a hearing behind closed doors. We're told that in that hearing he gave an opening statement and claimed that he did nothing wrong and he saw nothing. Well, really, you did nothing wrong. 17 times Jeffrey Epstein came to the Clinton White House. And how many times did Bill Clinton ride along on that airplane? How many times did he ride down to pedophile island? We've seen the pictures, Bill. We've seen them. We have pictures of you with women on Epstein's plane. There are pictures of you with Ghislaine Maxwell, the recruiter for Epstein, swimming around. We've got pictures of you in a hot tub with redacted women. That means they were redacted because either they were victims or because they were under age or underage victims. This is not good stuff. And so we need all of the information about what's going in here. And he's saying, oh, you shouldn't have included Hillary. He's so upset that they included Hillary. No, we are upset. We are upset at this country that was run for how many years with a pedophile elite. Groups of people that were willing to go along with things like this and then turn around and tell us that we're the problem for asking questions, that we are the ones who are doing the wrong thing by trying to figure out who was actually in charge of this country, who. And you listen to these things, you listen to these crazy things over and over and over. Epstein saying that he was instrumental in the founding of the Clinton Foundation. Epstein, who had this picture of Bill Clinton with the blue dress and red high heels and not a picture of artwork, a painting up in his mansion, New York City. What are we to make. What are we to make of that? And so we see this information. The transcripts have yet to come to light. We didn't have any leaked photos today like we did, at least not that I've seen. And what we are left with, unfortunately, is more questions. What we are left with is more questions about why it is bent, the cleanse. Let me ask you this, by the way. Why didn't the Clintons push for pushing all this information out in the first place? That's, that's the part where the logic just doesn't hold up here. So why wasn't it that the Clintons came forward and said, oh my gosh, oh my gosh, this guy, this terrible pedophile we have to take him down. We have to. You know who did do that? Donald Trump. Donald Trump went and did that and he was the one who came out there and called the police as far back, what was it, 2006? Even before the convictions, before the arrest. Donald Trump kicks him out of Mar A Lago. Donald Trump calls the police. Donald Trump contacts lawyers, says, what can I do? How can I get on board? How can we put this guy away? Because he's evil? And then who arrests him? Who was the only president that arrested Jeffrey Epstein? Oh, that's right. Donald Trump was the only one. So let's look at the actual record. I'm more than happy to look at the record. I hope you will as well. But instead, what we're getting are these emotional responses, these emotional indignants. We're getting all this nonsense. What we're not getting is answers about the Clinton's conduct with Jeffrey Epstein. Jack Posobic right back Human Events Daily.

[Will Chamberlain]

Foreign.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comDisclosures People at

[Jack Posobiec]

work supported me while I was going through treatment by not treating me like somebody who was going through treatment. Treatment sucks.

[Darren Selnick]

Cancer sucks.

[Jack Posobiec]

Being engaged with work really helped to

[Darren Selnick]

oh, I just knew I was going

[Jack Posobiec]

to beat this day. Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place for healing. Learn more and sign the [e-mail] Dreaming

[MyFICO Advertiser]

of buying your first car or a new home? Knowing your FICO score is the first step in making it real. With Myfico, you can check your score for free and it won't hurt your credit. You'll get your FICO score, full credit reports and real time alerts all in one simple app. Your credit score is more than just numbers. It's the key to building the future you've been working toward. Visit myfico.com free or download the MyFICO app and take the mystery out of your FICO score.

[Jack Posobiec]

New Year, New vibe.

[Public Ad Announcer]

You want the warmth of a drink,

[Jack Posobiec]

that smooth little kick.

[Public Ad Announcer]

But you also want to wake up tomorrow feeling amazing.

[Jack Posobiec]

That's where RK comes in. RK is the world's first zero proof spirits brand.

[Public Ad Announcer]

And they invented the warm mullet Heal, giving you the burn of whiskey or tequila without a drop of alcohol.

[Jack Posobiec]

Start the year strong with 28 bold zero proof spirits. Zero calories, zero sugar, zero regrets.

[Public Ad Announcer]

So you can celebrate big and still

[Jack Posobiec]

keep your resolutions on track. Start the year right.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Join the Zero Proof Resolution at rkbeverages.com

[Darren Selnick]

and in our way and our golden age has just begun.

[Jack Posobiec]

This is Human Events with Jack Posoba. Now it's time for everyone to understand what America first truly, truly means. Welcome to the second American Revolution. All right, Jack Pacific, we're back. Live here. Human events daily. Real America's voice. Folks, one in three people will face a battle with cancer. It's very unfortunate and most never see it coming. Well, Dr. Kelly Victory at the Wellness Company did everything right. She exercised, she ate clean, she avoided processed foods. She had zero symptoms. When she went in for a routine mammogram back in July 2023, she walked out with an aggressive cancer diagnosis that could have been fatal if found later revealed a hard truth. Even healthy people get cancer. And it exposed a bigger issue. Most modern medicine is reactive. It's not preventative. You wait for a scare until you start to care. Every day our bodies are under constant pressure. We know what it's like. The stress, toxins, inflammation, immune strain. That damage builds quietly year after year until disease starts to form. Dr. Victory asks a different question. What can we do daily to support the body before something goes wrong? That letter to formulate shield. SHIELD is a two part natural system designed to support immune balance, antioxidant defense and cellular health. Exactly the systems you want and strong to live a long healthy life. In the morning, drink the high dose nutraceutical cocoa mix then with Food. Take the soft gels with ingredients like medicinal mushrooms, turmeric, green tea, olive leaf, berberine, and black cumin seed oil shield will give your body the tools it needs to keep cells healthy. Head over to TWC Health POSO and use promo code POSO to get 10% off plus free shipping for US residents. That's TWC Health POSO. All right, I want to get Will Chamberlain here, Article 3 project. And it's been a minute since we've had him on, so I want to get him back. Will, how's it going, man?

[Will Chamberlain]

Always good to be with you, Jack.

[Jack Posobiec]

So, Will, you know, this week Tyler Robinson had yet another hearing. I don't know if you caught the hearing in full, but the big news that came out of that was that this motion that Tyler Robinson's lawyers had made the defense team regarding the striking down the prosecutor who. And in fact, they were actually trying to strike down the entire prosecutorial team in Utah county for. Because of the fact that his daughter, one of the prosecutor's daughters, not the main Utah attorney, but one of the prosecutor's daughters, had been in attendance at Utah Valley University when Charlie was shot and killed. And they were trying to say that this creates a conflict of interest and therefore that it biased the prosecutors and that they should be removed from the case. And the judge ruled against that. And there was a statement, Will, that he made. And I was wondering if you can unpack that for us, where he said he was talking about bias and he was talking about conflicts of interest, and he was saying that a conflict of interest isn't really appropriate here. I'm paraphrasing because there's no. The interest is in protecting the public here. This isn't a conflict where someone had a financial relationship or someone worked with someone or something like that. So protecting, you know, and this isn't a material witness or victim in this case. So there's no direct connection there. And so the conflict of interest doesn't really hold up because that's not what conflict of interest means. But he also pointed out that the bias of the prosecutor should always be protection of the public. Because this is the entire point of the doing of justice, of upholding justice and seeking justice, the role of the prosecutor. And the judge said. And I just, I. It blew me away because, you know, in this day and age, we don't hear this kind of talk very much. He said the point of the prosecutor that if the prosecutor believes that an individual has committed a crime and rightfully believes that this person has committed a heinous crime, then he has a duty and in fact, an obligation to seek the maximum and fullest penalty for that individual. So, Will, I want to know if you could unpack that a little bit for us. Just kind of in this woke social justice era, you don't usually hear people talking like this.

[Will Chamberlain]

Yeah, that's. That's a powerful statement. I mean, on the conflict of interest front, the. I mean, a conflict of interest is always when there is a interest of the prosecutor that is distinct from the broader interests of the public. So. And that's self dealing. So, you know, in a case where if the. If the prosecutor would personally benefit in a unique way or personally suffer in a unique way, if the decision came out in a particular manner, that's where a conflict of interest lies. And that's always where a conflict of interest lies. It's self dealing, and there's not gonna be any self dealing here. I mean, what is. Even in a world where there was some. The prosecutor was uniquely outraged by Tyler Robinson's conduct as a result of the fact her daughter is here. Well, then again, it wouldn't mean that his interest was unique or distinct from that of the public. It's completely aligned. Or that his interest wouldn't be distinct from that of the prosecutor to seek and do justice. That would be aligned. So it doesn't make sense. And it's good to see people understand that, you know, in a world of criminal justice reform and all this talk about the rights of criminals, people forget that the purpose of the prosecutor and the role of the state is to do justice. And sometimes justice for serious crimes is serious punishment and to seek the maximum punishment under the law. So it's good to see a judge understand that.

[Jack Posobiec]

No, it really was. And look, he treated, I think, the motion fairly. He held hearings on this. He called witnesses, he had people testify. I mean, he certainly gave it as. As the cliche goes, it had its day in court. And he came down and said, look, there's. There's no. I like to put that there's no deferring interest here. The interest of the public and the interest of the prosecutor are in complete alignment here. So there's no difference. Because, you know, and of course, I was listening to another commentator talk about this, and she pointed out that Andrew Burkhart. And she said that, that, you know, if you're in a small town, it's kind of hard to, you know, if there's a court case and someone happens to be walking by, you know, you know, in there, they Witness it and they might be related to somebody in an incidental way, then that doesn't create a conflict of interest. That's just living in a small town. You still have to, you have to have the case. You have to be able to do all. The town might only have what, three, four defense lawyers, depending on where you are, and, and potentially a small bench as well. And so, you know, the idea is, as you say, that the interest of justice and the interest of the public aren't. It's not that they shouldn't be aligned, it's that they are supposed to be aligned. That's the whole system.

[Will Chamberlain]

Yes. Correct. That's what, you know, the public does better when there is justice done. That's the entire purpose of our legal system. So that's why, you know, why, you know, the idea is that everybody gets a chance to vote on representatives who then write the laws. The, the enforcement of those laws is in the public interest. Yeah. The idea that there was some conflict here was always ridiculous.

[Jack Posobiec]

Well, and will, so to go back to that then is, and you and I have briefly said, and I know that, you know, credit to you as well, because this always just seemed like a very desperate delay tactic. And if this early in the case we're already hearing and seeing these delay tactics is, is the reason for that, that Tyler Robinson's side just doesn't have very strong of a case.

[Will Chamberlain]

Oh, of course they don't. I mean, there's, there's a huge amount of physical evidence, video evidence that points to Tyler Robinson. I mean, I think you posted about it. But there's DNA everywhere. And, and the DNA is Robinson's showing up on the gun, showing up on the, on the roof, showing up any number of, you know, in the places where that the figure in glasses carrying the gun was. And by the way, that figure in the glasses looks a lot like Tyler Robinson. He's walking around just like you would walk around if you had a long range rifle and you were trying to carry it discreetly in your pants. I mean, you can only be so discreet. You have to walk the way Robinson was walking. But the physical evidence is overwhelming. The motive is there. It's on the bullets, it's on everything. And so, you know, the idea that they're like, I mean, there's some really good case that they're gonna, you know, they're gonna pull out some witness who's gonna be like, actually, I saw the real killer. It's not Robinson. It's laughable. There's, there's way Way, way too much. So you have to sort of figure out a way to delay things. You have to figure out, you know, do what I mean. And I don't blame the defense lawyers. Their job is to be a zealous advocate for their client. I'm not gonna blame them for filing any motion that's non frivolous. And I don't think this motion was frivolous. It's like colorable. It's just not going to win. There's a difference between a frivolous argument, an argument that's never going to win.

[Jack Posobiec]

And so what I threw out here, you're referring to this post that I made. And about it, just walking through the trigger, the bolt handle, everywhere that you would expect him to touch if you were working the action, the towel he used as a cheek rest, the screwdriver which he left behind, even inside the spent casing. And so all of that, you know, all of that needs to come up in court. And so you, you, you've, you've got him on the roof, you've got him with the wet. You've got him. So he's on the roof. You were able to place him there. Then you have to place him with, place the gun in his hands, which they do through the, when, when you're reading these affidavits, they're walking you through the elements of the case so we can identify this individual. Well, well, let me get to that in a second. But this individual is identified on the location. He's then identified with the weapon, his hands. So he is there. He does have the, he has the means, motive and opportunity to be able to commit the crime. And then the piece I wanted to throw out is, is it gets into the fact that these, these statements which are made in affidavit will just, just for people to understand they need to be backed up in court. What we're seeing in the affidavit, of course, this is the charging document, but all of this has to be backed up. And so just simple question. Well, would a prosecutor submit something like that if they know, they knew that it could be easily just laughed out of court if, if it didn't hold up based on their own ballistics reporting, genetics recording, et cetera, et cetera.

[Will Chamberlain]

No, they wouldn't be introducing it themselves. They'd be hoping that the other side ignores it if it were not coming out the way that they, if anything, they might have started investigating other potential defendants if they couldn't find Robinson's DNA on places where they expected it. And they found a variety of other people's DNA, but clearly that's not. And I mean, if they. If. If they were all lying, I mean, one lie here would then undermine the entire credibility of the prosecution, because then what else are they lying about? So say they, you know, they put in a piece of evidence and made all these claims about Robinson's DNA being on it, and they. The Robinson's team was able to put up an expert explaining persuasively that it's all B.S. well, then that's not just the lack. You don't just lose this one piece of evidence. You lose your credibility across the evidence you're putting forward in the entire case. I mean, you're gonna. That's gonna be reasonable doubt right there, because the jury will reasonably think they can't believe you. So prosecutors don't do stuff like that unless they're completely and utterly incompetent. And they wouldn't. The Utah County U.S. attorney, Attorney's Office, the District Attorney's office knows that the focus of the country is going to be on this trial. They're going to put their most experienced prosecutors on it. People who have done murder trials before or people who have done other serious crimes, people who don't make mistakes like this.

[Jack Posobiec]

That's. That's been my read on this from the start. Jack Posobic, Will Chamberlain. We're talking about the. The Tyler Robinson case. The murder of Charlie Kirk. Right back.

[Darren Selnick]

Talk about influencers. These are influences, and they're friends of mine. Jack, where's J. Yeah, Jack. Got a great job.

[Jack Posobiec]

All right. Jack was soic. Here we are. Human Events Daily. Real America's Voice. I want to go back now to. We're talking about Tyler Robinson. We're talking about this case. And I want to go back to the affidavit. So we. We went through, of course, the forensic evidence. Now I want to get into the identification. And this is where the chain really begins. Because originally we were told that we didn't know who the shooter was those first couple hours, and there was a false identification of someone who they thought was the shooter that didn't come out right and then ended up not being the right person. And then the parents of Tyler Robinson c. His photo online on news, they see a photo of a rifle that they recognize because it had been Tyler's grandfather's rifle, which had been given to him. They confront Tyler. They say, you know, where's your grandfather's rifle? Because they know that it's in law enforcement custody at this point. He Gets belligerent, claims that he's going to kill himself at one point, and eventually they talk him into turning himself in. They then later give statements to the police, law enforcement to this effect. So, will. I want to get Will Chamberlain in here again. So, Will, when. When we're looking at all of this from. From the statement of an evidentiary value, how valuable is it in a court case when you have an identification like this coming directly from family? And, you know, certainly this is the kind of thing that'll be introduced. I mean, there's likely a possibility that the father or mother might even testify. Just to be able to back this up. You know, we know that they've been attending the hearings. How valuable is this? What role does this play in the actual trial as we are just a couple months away?

[Will Chamberlain]

Well, it's compounding persuasive evidence that he's really the killer. I mean, his conduct in this circumstance of, you know, getting belligerent, being unable to produce the weapon that he had been given, that is, later, you know, that they're able to identify as the weapon found in the hills behind the school. It's all just extremely persuasive and explanatory evidence that I think a jury will find really compelling. And yet another explanation, like, why would parents turn their child in if they didn't think he had done it? I mean, what parent would do that? Right? I mean, it's one thing if you're a parent and you're confronted with your son and you have extremely good reason to think they committed a very serious crime and that they're about to be charged with it, like, yeah, you. I mean, a good parent in that circumstance, as loyal as they are to their child, will still insist that their child turn themselves in. But, you know, it's. Would lie.

[Jack Posobiec]

I just said this. Yeah, I've said this a couple times. I was at liberty. I got asked this question, and I said the same. I said it again. I'll just be honest that I. I don't even know if I can make that phone call that were one of my kids. I just. I'm not going to sit here and say, like, oh, I definitely. I have no idea. Just knowing that, you know, you're. You're. Whatever life you had, whatever hopes and dreams you had for your child, it's. It's all going to be gone after you pick up that call, you pick up that phone. It's all gone.

[Will Chamberlain]

I still hope I could. You know, you don't know that you would until you get There, but you hope that you could because it is, it is a, it's a fundamentally pro. Civilizational thing. It's, it's what differs us from really deeply tribal and clannish civilizations where they would try to help their children.

[Jack Posobiec]

It's first world behavior. First world behavior, yes. Of the highest order. The highest order. First world behavior, yeah.

[Will Chamberlain]

And credit to his parents for doing that. Honestly, like, credit to them. That would. Must have been an extremely hard thing for them to do. And they still, they did the right thing and ensure that he is now in custody and will face a trial and justice.

[Jack Posobiec]

And we know that I saw some reporting from Brian NETTON over at NewsNation that his parents have accompanied or not accompanied, but have appeared in court for the in person hearings that Tyler has had. He reported that the mother was just sobbing pretty much the entire time during the proceedings. Father looking pretty stoic. And you know, and I've seen, and this comes up online, you know, every time I seem to tweet about this, that they say, well, what if, you know, what, what if they were coerced? What if they were, you know, what if they did it for some other reason? And I just keep thinking, well, if they thought he was innocent, why not? You know, if. For some reason. Let's. Okay, Devil's advocate, you know, let's say they decided they wanted to recant. I mean, they'd be able to amend their statements, right?

[Will Chamberlain]

Oh, sure, yeah. If they felt coerced, gosh, that would be the story of the century. And they immediately get a lot of protection if there were some good faith basis on which they could explain why they were being coerced and who coerced them. But moreover, what parent would allow themselves to be coerced into giving up their own child? That's insane. A parent would. I can speak from. I know for my. There's no world in which I could be coerced to hand over my daughter to something unjust like. I couldn't. You couldn't. I would die for this.

[Jack Posobiec]

I would, I would sooner, by the way. And you see, you do tend to see parents who, you know, even try to turn themselves in and, you know, claim, you know, claim the blame over and over. I could see myself doing something like that just out of loyalty to the child and out of love for them and, you know, that irrational love that parents have for their children, which you need to have if you want your society to continue. But it's, you know, the idea to me, to me, the part where this, you know, this question just falls apart is that the. The parents are right there. They are right there. And the media is right there every day as well. You know, fully free to be able to take any statement. The court is right there. And I think I would say that to anyone, to anyone who thinks that they have, you know, I've got it. I've got the evidence. I've got the one piece that, you know, proves Tyler Robinson is innocent. Well, guess what? There's a court case going on right now. And in this trial, as it turns out, that's the very question that we are trying to determine. And feel free, Feel free to submit anything you have in writing to the court. And I would encourage anyone to do so. I, I certainly, you know, I certainly think I would say now is the time to do that. Right.

[Will Chamberlain]

Yeah. And, and here's the thing I would say, I mean, not that his parents have spoken up publicly, but I guarantee you that with, you know, this random idea that you found some unique piece of evidence that exonerates Tyler, I guarantee his parents don't agree with you. I guarantee his parents would think you're a lunatic. Like, they know their conduct demonstrates they know exactly what happened here. And I mean, that's not going to be like the way it's going to work, but they know.

[Jack Posobiec]

I just, I feel like their conduct is, is. It's. While it's honorable and it's tragic, it's also. And it's because it's so tragic, that's how, you know, it confirms. It confirms what happened and certainly confirms what they believe. Will Chamberlain. Where can people follow you, brother?

[Will Chamberlain]

At Will Chamberlain X. And you can follow the Article 3 project at a3paction.com God bless, man.

[Jack Posobiec]

Thanks so much for coming on right back.

[Will Chamberlain]

Thank you.

[Darren Selnick]

Where's Jack? Where's Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack.

[Jack Posobiec]

Thank you. Thank you.

[Darren Selnick]

What a job you do. You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who've been getting publicist.

[Jack Posobiec]

All right, Jack Posobiek back live here, Human Events Daily. Real America's Voice. Folks, if you're a homeowner in America, you need to listen to this. The FBI has been warning about a type of real estate fraud on the rise called title theft. And your equity is the target. Here's how it works. Criminals forge your signature on a single document, use a fake notary stamp and file it with the county. And just like that, on record, they use they own your home using your own ownership. They can take out loans against your equity or even sell your property. And you won't know about it until foreclosure or collection notices show up in the mail. Well, that's why I partnered with Home Title Lock, so you can protect your equity. And find out today, if you're already a victim, use promo code [e-mail] and you'll get a free title history report and a free trial of their million dollar triple lock protection. That's 24,7 monitoring of your title records, urgent alerts to any changes. And if fraud occurs, their US based restoration team will spend up to $1 million to fix it. Don't be a victim. Protect your Equity today. That's Hometitle lock.com promo code POSO. Okay, guys, breaking news. We're getting new information that's coming out of the Clinton deposition on Jeffrey Epstein. Per Representative Comer, President Clinton testified under oath that, that President Trump has never said anything to me to make me think he was involved with Epstein. So there you go. Even Bill Clinton himself is saying that Trump was not involved with Epstein. So Bill Clinton himself, who has every reason to try to throw Trump under the bus, to try to bring him up, to try to, to muddy the waters, to try to get the stink off of him, get the heat off of him, Bill Clinton is in there, according, according to this report, saying that Donald Trump wasn't involved with Epstein. I don't know what else you need, folks. I don't know what else you need on this Clinton. We got the photos. We've got every single one. But even when pushed, even when pushed back against the wall, Bill Clinton did not. And remember, by the way, Bill Clinton is no stranger to committing perjury under depositions. All right. We certainly are well and sure aware that he has done so in the past, remember, and not have sexual relations with that woman. Okay, that was perjury. You obviously had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. But the point is that he lied under oath about that. But even still, he is coming up and saying that Donald Trump, not involved with Jeffrey Epstein, wanted to shift gears a little bit because as we've seen over the evening, a lot more has gone on. Israel, Iran, the United States, this deployment forces deployed. And it really interesting, really interesting kind of new wrinkle that's been added to all of this is, is the wrinkle of Chinese imagery and Chinese commercial imagery that's coming out publicly from what it's called Mizar vision. And I Want to throw some of these images up for folks to see that what China is now doing is collecting commercial real time imagery of US F22s sitting there parked right on the Runway in Israel right there on these sites. Now this is imagery at a level, you know, that's, that's really just at a level. You're looking at support vehicles, you look at Patriot missile systems, you're looking at everything that's coming up. This is imagery, I'm just going to say it, that you would not normally see in an unclassified open source environment. This is the kind of stuff that let's just say that I, I used to look at daily in my previous profession and we are just going to have to get used to the Chinese. Now releasing, I believe there's a photo of the USS Ford as well that they released as the USS Gerald Ford, the most powerful. That's the Lincoln and I think there's another one under undergoing resupply right there. That's why I see the two ships next to each other. I think there's another one of the Ford aircraft carrier that's even closer. There it is with, you can see the aircraft embarked right there on the hat, right there on the flight deck. So you know, that's a, that's a, we want you to see us coming kind of, kind of set up. They're, they're all ready for air operations. As you can see. They're, they're riding heavy and this is not the kind of stuff you usually see publicly, but it's going to be out there. And the Ford of course arrived to Israel just off the coast of Haifa, which is the port of Jerusalem just, or the port of Tel Aviv just a few hours ago. So USS Ford there providing that defensive, defensive framework along with the Iron Dome as we potentially are waiting to see whether or not these operations, combat operations are set to kick off. I wanted to get in now. Darren Selnick is joining us. He's a former Deputy Chief of Staff, the Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth. Darren, how are you?

[Darren Selnick]

I am great. Thanks for having me on.

[Jack Posobiec]

Well, thanks for joining us. Well, look, I was just going through and you as well as I am sure you know, coming from this background, we're not used to seeing this type of imagery public, are we?

[Darren Selnick]

No, that's why they have skiffs in the Pentagon. But yeah, that tells you something when you're seeing public. Not good. Not good.

[Jack Posobiec]

Yeah, it's really just a, you know, the Chinese certainly using their showing, showcasing their capabilities. This is Another example of information warfare that the Chinese Communist Party are going to bring to bear. You know, I noticed that the Chinese haven't been doing this for the Russians in any of their Ukraine operations. But certainly something that going forward, this is just the world we live in now.

[Darren Selnick]

It is. That's why, you know, China is a top threat that we have to contend with and that we are. You know, when I was at Dow that we were focusing on, and it's, it's ultimately my personal opinion China is going to be our greatest threat and we have to deal with it.

[Jack Posobiec]

Well, there's no question about that. And I completely concur with you there. Now, looking at, looking at the force lay down the forces aligned that President Trump has deployed out to the Gulf, out to centcom. What is your read in what we may see? We're hearing that potentially strikes could occur as early as this weekend.

[Darren Selnick]

Yeah, I'm hearing some of the same stuff. I think one of the things that was accurately reported by the media that I saw today, they said the president said he hasn't made a final decision. And I think that's correct. When I was in the White House and Trump won and we worked on things, my experience with the president is that he talked to all, all relevant people to talk to that had information, got all sides and would not make a decision until the very last second because facts on the ground change. So when he's, when he makes a decision, that decision is final. But he doesn't preordain those decisions because things can change. Facts on the ground can change. The Iranians can suddenly capitulate those sorts of things. So he will continue to take all information and then he will make the decision that it's going to work best. General Kane's doing a great job. Pete Hex is doing a great job. They have the forces there. They have, you know, coordinated between all the different undersecretaries and the military plans. They are ready to go. They, I'm sure they have presented a number of options to the president. The president will pick the option that will do the, you know, my guess, the least amount of, you know, strength that they need, use the appropriate force that you need to get the appropriate outcome. So I think that's what the president will, will pick. He will make the estimate. Remember, he has the intelligence and the other that has facts on the ground that we don't have, that Congress doesn't have. So he will pick the military option that he believes is the right option to get Iran to take this seriously and do what they need to do. He won't do more than we actually have. Less than necessary. He will pick the option that is what is necessary to get the desired result. He did Iran before he did Gaza. He's got a lot of experience. I have total faith and trust that he will pick the option needed. And I would take his gut reaction in what he believes over anyone else.

[Jack Posobiec]

And I think that we actually have a new statement from the president on this just moments ago. Let's play that now, guys.

[Darren Selnick]

Look, it'd be wonderful if they negotiate really in good conscience. Good faith and conscience. But they, they are not getting there so far, Peter. They're not getting there.

[Jack Posobiec]

And has your team told you that

[Will Chamberlain]

if you use the military now that there will be regime change right away?

[Darren Selnick]

No, nobody's telling me that. You don't know. I mean, nobody. Nobody knows. There might be and there might not be. It'd be nice if we could do it without. But sometimes you have to do it with.

[Will Chamberlain]

We.

[Darren Selnick]

When you looked at what. Look, we have the greatest military anywhere in the world. There's nothing close. I'd love not to use it, but sometimes you have to.

[Jack Posobiec]

Well, that, that goes right back there. President Trump employing, I believe they call that strategic ambiguity.

[Darren Selnick]

Well, it is strategic ambiguity, but it's also. He's going to continue to get reports in from the military side, from his diplomatic team. You know, Marco Ruru is going to be weighing in. The diplomatic team is going to be weighing in. And at some point he's going to just make a decision that, hey, you know, I don't. Either that they have went ahead and made a breakthrough or not. And I mean, that's right.

[Jack Posobiec]

We'll see.

[Darren Selnick]

Coming up on our strings, you a little.

[Jack Posobiec]

Coming up on our break, Darren Selnick. Where can people go to follow you and get your stuff?

[Darren Selnick]

You follow me on. On X. That's for. Easiest way to get me is just hook me up on X.

[Jack Posobiec]

Perfect. Darren Selnick on X. I'll be looking to you for your expertise. Thank you so much for joining us here. Human Events Daily. They feed you headlines, cut the frame, say it loud enough, call it fat, change the words, dodge, blame, sell the.

[Public Ad Announcer]

So we're gonna call this the Jack Posobic Appreciation Hour. I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack Posobic.

[Will Chamberlain]

And that. That is.

[Jack Posobiec]

I'm. I'm being honest. All right, folks, Jack Posobic. We're back live here. Human Events Daily. And so, folks, you know the big question that's come in and I want to keep hearing from all of you on this. And so we put up the human events day of, you know, the question of the day. We said, what are your thoughts on US Military action in Iran? And we're doing something a little bit differently today because we said, please indicate your age. So 1776 human events.com 1776 human events.com and I wanted to throw in, you know, a little, little color of Charlie from last year when Charlie spoke about this. Guys, let's play clip D15.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Western forced central planning Regime change is if we are just going to take out the Ayatollah. Oh, really? What comes next? What comes after regime change might be, oh, well, we need a small number of US Troops to support the new regime. We have seen this play before. Regime change. You have no idea how this is going to work out. You have no idea.

[Jack Posobiec]

And that was Charlie June of last year when this debate was raging. And I've said before, guys, I'm not for a regime change war in Iran. I'm not for a prolonged war in Iran. I'm not for a war in Iran. If, if President Trump is going to conduct limited strikes and take out a specific piece of the nuclear program, something that had to be, you know, something that along lines of Operation Midnight Hammer, that's one thing. Okay, that's one thing completely. But ultimately, this idea that we're going to go in and knock off the, the ayatollah and the mullahs and just get the best government we want, I just, I think it's folly. We did the entire podcast series Tales of Regime Change just a couple of weeks ago and that's exactly what we saw. Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine. It happens again and again and again and it never seems to work because you just don't know what's going to come back. But promised emails. Let's go in. And this is great because today we've got the ages and I think there's going to be some interesting stuff, perhaps some stuff that you wouldn't expect because I've been, I've been perusing them a little bit. So when comments comes in From Michael, he's 37, a G Wat vet, I'm very skeptical. Any clean snatch and grab is one belt fed burst away from a downed aircraft and dead Americans. We got lucky in venezuela. If that CW5 hadn't managed to keep his wits after being shot, the whole thing could have gone extremely wrong. Iran is not Venezuela. It's Going to be much harder to get anyone out of the place if things go wrong. It's not just going to be 20 miles from the coast and says that people under 40, you know, like Lindsey Graham is always around. People under 40 do not seem to be advocated for anymore. It turns into a mess. People like myself who may vote third party in federal elections as a protest if we show up at all. You need that 2 to 3% to win. The Democrats seem to actively realize and act this. Stephen, 38 years old, voted for Trump three times on the campaign promise of no foreign wars and draining the swamp against US military action in Iran. We need to stand firm and say no, they won't stop at Iran. This one in from Allah, 40 years old. I support strikes on Iran if, especially if they are surgical and precise and effective. Stop Iran from going nuclear and stop the suffering of the Iranian people. Laura, 61. He ran on the presidential race for no new wars. Let them settle it. This is Israel's fight, not ours. Thanks, Poso. This one in from Julie. Absolutely no boots on the ground, but I'm fine with airstrikes. 63. This one in from Lara. 61. No more wars. His. Oh, wait, sorry, I read that one. Oh no, she emailed us twice. Laura sent in too. Here we go. This one is from Lool. He's 26. I believe that going to war with Iran is a catastrophic mistake and a betrayal of the campaign promises that President Trump ran on and I supported for three election cycles. We need to be America first. We're 40 trillion in debt, Young people can't afford homes and are increasingly struggling to compete in the workforce due to the consequences of globalism. This war risks putting us in global recession and spiking global oil prices. Okay, just pulling up some other emails here. Just going through. These are great. I love the emails. I really appreciate it. Guys, this one's in from say she is 19. I am against. Let's see. Abram comes in. No email from Abra or no age from Abram. No one wants to die in this war. It's not for us. The Christian army and will end up killing all the Christians who live in Iran. And we talked about that how it certainly happens when we get these regime change wars in the Middle East. They always seem to end up with Christians being killed. This one's in from Daniel, 50. I say no unless absolutely necessary and if necessary, do it right and complete the job. Kim, 56 years old, against Buford. Buford from Kentucky, age 30. I'm sorry, that's just perfect. Buford from Kentucky. Of course. He is age 36. No, no and no to war with Iran. This one in from MacKenzie. She is 30. Stay at home mom, three kids under four. I think it's the same Mackenzie from yesterday. I don't give a darn. I need the SAVE act passed and the economy fixed. God bless you. MacKenzie, 30 years old, three kids under four. God bless you. This one's in from Brennan. 24. I supported military action against Venezuela as it's our sphere of influence. But I'm completely against action against Iran. Israel has been claiming Iran is on the cusp of developing a nuclear weapon for decades in an effort to trigger U.S. involvement. It appears as if this lobby is pushing the US towards towards this to further their goals. It will be a net loss for us. Let's see this one from Shirley. She's 66. I support the elimination of their nuclear capabilities. There's ways to have nuclear power for peaceful purposes. The leadership doesn't seem to want that. Regarding regime change, I'm concerned about the plan after removing leaders. The people seem to not want the Islamic government. They're dying by the thousands. This world turned a blind eye to Tiananmen Square by welcoming China into the World Trade Organization shortly thereafter. Surely listened to the China files because we covered that extensively in the China files. The Iranian people deserve better. Yet our record of supporting regime change is far from from stellar. I can't help but think of the thousands of sailors serving on our carriers that are positioned near Iran and Israel. My son served as an ETN on the Bush. That's an enlisted sailor. I'm sure. Electronic technician. I'm sure there are a lot of concerned families praying for their loved ones. ETN Network Electric Technician to those who say why is this our business? Why is it up to us to take these actions? Because we're the only country in the world capable. I'm 66. You didn't ask. But I have three adult children and six grandchildren. I'm concerned about their future. Shirley, thank you so much for your email. That was a very sweet email. All right, we got Devin, 25. Why are we willing to sacrifice more American blood and taxpayer money for an issue that only concerns us because we put ourselves in it? Why does this matter more than the tens of millions of illegals in our country? Basically stealing any hope of the American dream that is left? Or the fact that our country and world are being run by pedophiles? Referring to the Epstein files. What about the corruption that continues to go unpunished all the war with Iran does is show us how unimportant these issues that the common man actually faces are to those who run the country. These, these emails are just, are just amazing. Okay, pulling some more, pulling some more there. I mean, they're just flying in. 1776 human events dot com. Here's one from Phil. I just turned 65. Let Persia do Persia. There's plenty of money and material for them to take care of themselves. Minute left. I'm going to go quick. Sarah, age 60. I do not support military action in Iran. Clara, 44. All of my family, over 50 people ranging from. Okay, ranging from early 20s to their 80s. Over 50 people. I talked to a lot of my family. I don't know if I talked to 15 people. We all support taking out the Iranian regime to rescue the Iranian people. Trump will not handcuff our troops like Bush, Clinton, Obama. 14 people under 6, under 30, 6 people under 18 who are involved in politics here in central Alabama. Okay. Scorched earth. This one from Blake. He is 31 with a 5 year old son. He's in, he's in Texas. He said, I'm going to read this, Blake, because you wrote it sent from a church bathroom stall in Texas. Scorched earth, then pavement. The leftists are trying to get people comfortable with the presence of Islam in the West. We can never let this happen. Well, I certainly agree that we need to do something about immigration. We need to take the fight to them. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission to lay short.

[MyFICO Advertiser]

This is an I heart podcast, guaranteed human.