Human Events with Jack Posobiec – January 29, 2026
Podcast: Real America's Voice
Host: Jack Posobiec
Guests: Dr. Charles Cornersdale (Raw Egg Nationalist), Will Chamberlain (Article 3 Project), Evita Duffy (Columnist/Activist)
Overview:
Jack Posobiec leads an in-depth analysis of recent events surrounding the shooting of Alex Preddy in Minneapolis, the broader issue of left-wing agitators versus law enforcement, and the evolving philosophy of the New Right regarding state power. Joined by recurring guest Dr. Charles Cornersdale ("Raw Egg Nationalist"), legal commentator Will Chamberlain, and columnist/activist Evita Duffy, the episode debunks mainstream narratives, discusses agitprop, radicalization, and policy ramifications, and addresses the impact of anarcho-tyranny and youth politics in America.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Breaking Down the Alex Preddy Narrative
-
Media/Democrat Narrative Exposed:
-
New video evidence verified by the BBC disproves claims that Alex Preddy was a peaceful bystander or nurse—he was actually a violent agitator [03:19–04:52].
-
Jack & Raw Egg Nationalist highlight a deliberate freeze-frame game in mainstream coverage—manipulating short clips for agitprop rather than contextual truth [04:52–05:58].
"So many people lied about this. And I think we need to really spend the entire episode talking about all of them."
—Jack Posobiec [03:19]
-
-
Pattern Recognition:
-
The case mirrors past events like the Kyle Rittenhouse incident in Kenosha and even draws comparisons to international military tactics used in chaotic zones [10:38–12:07].
“There is a very distinctive MO that Antifa has, and there is a very distinctive way that the Democrat Party and the left, the organs of leftist government, utilize groups like Antifa and these people on the ground as foot soldiers.”
—Raw Egg Nationalist [11:13]
-
-
Intentional Escalation:
-
Protest organizers receive explicit training to disrupt ICE operations, involving planned de-arrests, spotters, and armed agitators [13:09–13:49].
-
Preddy’s behavior—including carrying a gun without proper ID/permits and attacking officers—contradicts claims that he was simply exercising his Second Amendment rights [14:35–16:39].
“We can see his criminal history on video. What is going on in Minnesota?”
—Jack Posobiec [09:54]
-
2. Violence, Radicalization, and the Psychology Behind It
-
Major Life Events Preceding Radicalization:
-
Jack and Ren discuss a recurring pattern: personal setbacks (divorce, job loss, dropout) often precede a leap into radicalism or violent activism [21:53–23:35].
“It is typically tied to a major life event... then they turn to these radical causes and attempt to take radical action.”
—Jack Posobiec [21:22]
-
-
Hormone Debate: Testosterone, Estrogen, and Modern Male Violence:
-
Drawing from Ren’s book The Last Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity, they explore the idea that many activists are not classic “testosterone alpha males,” but rather, may be driven by low testosterone and higher estrogen, resulting in irrational or overcompensating aggression [23:53–25:49].
- Notably, attempts by leftist media to digitally “enhance” Preddy’s masculinity for public sympathy are called out.
"An estrogenic man actually can be more aggressive than a man with testosterone... It’s overcompensation."
—Raw Egg Nationalist [25:35]
-
3. Agitprop: Tactics, History, and Right-Wing Response
-
What is Agitprop?
-
Will Chamberlain explains: Agitprop is agitation propaganda—a tactic to provoke authorities into violence for propaganda purposes [30:49–31:25].
- These tactics, perfected in past events like George Floyd, aim to manufacture crisis and manipulate emotions through selective, viral video [31:42–33:15].
“Really, every one of these videoed interactions between these antifa protesters and law enforcement is an attempt to create useful agitprop.”
—Will Chamberlain [30:59]
-
-
Conservative vs Libertarian Approach:
-
The New Right now endorses using government power for conservative ends, moving away from reflexive anti-statism [33:39–35:47].
- Chamberlain describes the old small-government philosophy as dogmatic and outdated in the face of leftist tactics that use institutions aggressively.
"We're perfectly willing to use law, we're perfectly willing to come up with legal fixes... A small government is a means, not an end."
—Will Chamberlain [34:25]
-
4. Anarcho-Tyranny and the Crisis of Middle America
-
Disenfranchisement of Trump Voters:
-
Evita Duffy highlights how middle-class and rural Trump voters see their votes and safety undermined by lax enforcement on illegal immigration and tolerance of leftist agitation [39:25–40:42].
“There are millions of Americans across the country who voted for President Trump, who voted therefore for mass deportations and are being defrauded out of their vote by psychopath antifa Karens in Minneapolis.”
—Evita Duffy [39:25]
-
-
Radicalization of Suburban Women:
-
Jack points to a trend of “suburban moms” becoming radicalized, even participating in violent protests and “ISIS style vehicular assaults on federal officers” [43:38–45:01].
-
Minneapolis (and similar cities) serves as a case study in anarcho-tyranny: chaos at the bottom toleration, government inaction at the top, middle-class squeezed in between [42:37–43:38].
“This is how the people in power squeeze out the middle class by using these agitators, using this criminal class... and then essentially giving them a free pass.”
—Jack Posobiec [44:13]
-
-
Policy Implications:
- Guests argue that any administration that “backs down” in the face of Antifa-style violence signals weakness, encourages more unrest, and betrays the voters’ mandate [46:05–47:20].
- Ordinary citizens are urged to withhold judgment (the "48-hour rule") and seek out full context before reacting to viral news [47:20–47:32].
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
On the media narrative:
“This completely destroys the narrative, doesn’t it, that they were trying to say this individual was some peaceful nurse... He was a violent person.”
—Raw Egg Nationalist [03:54] -
On radicalization patterns:
"It is typically tied to a major life event... then they turn to these radical causes and attempt to take radical action."
—Jack Posobiec [21:22] -
On government power:
"We're perfectly willing to use law, we're perfectly willing to come up with legal fixes... A small government is a means, not an end."
—Will Chamberlain [34:25] -
On anarcho-tyranny:
"Anarcho tyranny is... where chaos is controlled... by government against the citizens. Low level crime is tolerated and encouraged... as a way of maintaining endemic crime, terrorizing the middle classes."
—Raw Egg Nationalist [42:37] -
On agitprop and response:
“Really, every one of these videoed interactions between these antifa protesters and law enforcement is an attempt to create useful agitprop.”
—Will Chamberlain [30:59]"What happens if we say, oh, we shouldn’t use government power because what if the left uses it against us in the future? Well... you end up ceding power, allowing your enemies to become totally entrenched in government... potentially you're shut out from government for good."
—Raw Egg Nationalist [36:00]
Key Timestamps for Major Segments
| Timestamp | Topic / Segment | |------------|---------------------------------------------| | 00:28–01:16| News Round-up: Trump, Venezuela, Iran, CA Fires | | 03:19–04:52| Debunking the Alex Preddy "peaceful" narrative | | 10:38–12:07| Comparing Preddy to Rosenbaum/Rittenhouse, Antifa as Paramilitary | | 13:09–14:35| Protest training: De-Arrest, Spotters, Escalation | | 21:53–23:35| Radicalization after personal setbacks | | 23:49–25:49| Male aggression, hormones, "Death of Masculinity" | | 29:35–31:25| Chamberlain on agitprop and right’s media vulnerability | | 33:39–36:33| New Right: Embracing government power | | 39:25–40:42| Evita Duffy: Middle America and immigration | | 42:37–43:38| Anarcho-tyranny defined | | 45:01–47:20| Countering anarcho-tyranny, citizen response |
Tone and Style
The conversation is combative, darkly humorous, and deeply skeptical of both mainstream media and left-of-center political narratives. Jack Posobiec leads with urgency and a sense of crusading vindication; his guests echo this with energetic, sometimes blunt analysis. The show’s language alternates between policy wonkiness, cultural critique, and overt activism.
Conclusion
This episode serves as an aggressive rebuttal to both the media’s portrayal of Minneapolis events and to libertarian and moderate conservative hesitancy on wielding state power. The hosts urge a reevaluation of philosophical premises, advocate for a robust government response to left-wing agitation, and warn that passivity leads to disaster for the right and for middle-class America. The guests blend policy insight, cultural critique, and first-hand experience, aiming to galvanize their audience toward both vigilance and activism.
