Loading summary
Transcript491 lines
- [00:00]
A
This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human. If your TV sounds funny in the evening, you're watching live from Studio 6B on Real America's Voice. All right, live from Studio 6B, Real America's Voice, 8 o' clock on the East Coast, February 4th. Glad you're in, everybody. Lots to talk about tonight. Hope you had a great day. Slick Rick's here. He's gonna do some sports. Rick Delgado's got some headlines. Pauline Nolan is here. He's got some news as well. Aaron and Fran holding it down as always. Slickster. How are you? I'm doing good, Big D. How was your day?
- [00:55]
B
Very good. Busy, long day. But good, good, productive day.
- [00:58]
A
What did you do?
- [00:58]
B
Well, I had a big meeting this morning with 50 other chambers of commerce on Long Island, Suffolk county, and we.
- [01:04]
A
Show him your dancing video.
- [01:06]
B
No, I didn't. I said it to one of the guys in the band, though. He loved it. One of the guys that was on stage, one of my friends.
- [01:11]
A
Okay.
- [01:12]
B
No, I did not get into that, but they were, you know, of course, my clothes and everything, but it was good. Great meeting, though. And my good friend Anthony Picarello became the presiding officer of the Suffolk county legislature. So he's the big guy in Suffolk county government. I love Anthony. Real fiscal conservative. Really wants to get money for small business and stop letting all these big corporations come into Long island and get all these tax abatements. And, man, he is. He's fire, this young man. But it was funny because he said he's known me so long that when I was president of the chamber, he just was able to vote. Now he's about 40 something years old. He was 18, so, you know, 25 years as president. It's a long time in his lifespan, but he's a good kid.
- [01:47]
A
All right, very good. Anything exciting coming up in Sports tonight?
- [01:49]
B
Well, we got a lot of stuff. First of all, the president's going to sit down with NBC. Rick's got a couple of clips. I got that story for the super bowl interview, which he customarily is doing every year. We're looking forward to that. Nike got a little trouble being under investigation about some illegal labor with white folks, no less. So we're going to check on that as well. And, well, we got big lawsuits, too. We got. Well, DK Metcalf got a big lawsuit. That Lions fan that's suing him. And so we got a lot coming up.
- [02:18]
A
All right. Very good, slickoheb. Sports, of course, sports brought to you by Mike Lindell. Mr. Delgado, how are you?
- [02:24]
C
I'm okay for now, but if I start screaming like a sissy later.
- [02:28]
A
Yeah.
- [02:29]
C
And it's because I did a very heavy leg workout. And if you were watching the show, I think it was Friday. Right, right, Aaron. Where I disappeared off camera for a while because my leg cramped up.
- [02:39]
A
Yes.
- [02:39]
C
I thought you were dying. Yeah, she thought I was having a heart attack.
- [02:42]
B
That was Friday night show. Yeah, I missed that. I would have been pulling your leg.
- [02:45]
C
Almost on the floor.
- [02:48]
A
Okay.
- [02:49]
C
It was a little nuts. Yeah. So if I start to seize or scream, then you'll know I'm having a cramp.
- [02:55]
A
Maybe you need some Fit King Air compression sleeves, too. I just got my dad order me a set. Okay. Paul Nolan. Sierra. Mr. Nolan, how are you?
- [03:06]
D
I need that thick Kings for the whole body.
- [03:10]
A
You can't compress your weight down.
- [03:12]
D
Head to toe. Yeah. I've come to the realization, you know, I always was hard on myself. Just keep the weight down. And, you know, people like, oh, you look fine now. People like, you're gonna be okay. You know.
- [03:28]
A
It'S.
- [03:29]
B
That's rough.
- [03:30]
A
It's a little change. So to talk about here on a Wednesday night, but let's start, as we always do, with tonight's first word. So today I. You'll be all right, Paul. So today I thought. Thought we'd start a series of first words. You know, same fire, same clarity, same unapologetic defense of American prosperity. But let's do it right back to the Republicans. Let's give them some ideas, folks, because, you know, in the midterms they're coming up, and it's time for Republicans to stop playing defense on the economy and start swinging for the fences. For millions of Americans, the cost of living isn't some abstract graph on cnn. It's a daily kick in the gut. Rent through the roof, grocery prices make you wonder if you need a second mortgage just for bread and milk, energy bills that look like telephone numbers. And taxes, state income taxes that hit you every single paycheck like a mugger in a back alley. And where do you feel at the worst? In the same blue states year after year after year. California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois. Meanwhile, in places like Florida, Texas, Tennessee, states that say, no thanks to broad personal income taxes, people are moving in by the millions, jobs are booming, wages are rising, and life is actually affordable. This isn't coincidence, folks. This is policy. This is the difference between freedom and punishment. And Republicans have a golden opportunity right now, heading into the 2026 midterms, to stop whining about biden Harris inflation still hanging around and start offering the one big, bold reform that would supercharge President Trump's economic legacy. How about we abolish state income taxes everywhere? That's right. Why don't Republicans run on eliminating the state income tax, not tweaking it, not cutting it a little, abolishing it. Because when you do, you sharpen the contrast between red state success and and blue state failure so brightly that even the mainstream media can't really hide from it. Look at the numbers. They speak for themselves. And these aren't from some conservative think tank. These come straight from the White House Council of Economic Advisers and federal data. The nine states with no broad personal income tax, five of them are in the top 10 for GDP growth, four in the top 10 for net domestic migration. People are voting with their feet and they're running, not walking away from high tax hell holes in all these blue states. California lost another 300,000 plus residents last year. New York, New Jersey, bleeding population. And who's leaving? Not the folks on welfare. It's the high earners, the entrepreneurs, the innovators, the very people who create the jobs and drive the growth. They can work anywhere now and they're choosing freedom. Why? Because income taxes are the most destructive taxes that we have. They punish work, they punish success, they punish risk taking. Economists called it dead weight loss. Every dollar you take, an income tax kills more economic activity than a dollar in sales or property tax. Raise rates and people work less, invent less, start fewer businesses. One study showed a single percentage point increase in top marginal rates cuts, patenting real innovation by 4. 4%. 4%. That's inventors packing up and moving to Texas. Now, of course, the left will do what they always do. And that scream things like, but how are you going to pay for roads and pay for your schools? Easy. Replace it with broader consumption taxes that exempt groceries, housing, rent and business investment. The essentials families need. The CEA modeled this exact scenario. The results state GDP up 1 to 1.6%. Average wages up nearly $4,000 per worker, new business formation up 16 to 19%. That's not theory, that's math. And look at the real world proof we already have. States President Trump carried in 24 had average inflation of 2 1/2 percent. Harris states 3%. In big metro areas, the gap was even wider. 1.9% in Trump metro versus 3% in Harris metros. Housing inflation, 2.3% in Trump areas, 3.9% in Harris areas. Moody's says roughly 23 states, mostly blue, are either in recession or at high risk. California and New York, the Democratic crown jewels that make up over a fifth of the entire US Economy, are barely growing. Red states booming, folks. This is the choice in 2026. Republicans need to hammer it every single day. Do you want an America where work is rewarded, risk is encouraged, and prosperity compounds? Or do you want an America where success is punished, innovation flees, and opportunity dies on the vine? Abolishing state income taxes isn't radical. It's common sense. It's pro worker, it's pro family. And it would finally let President Trump's economic agenda, tax cuts, deregulation, energy dominance, work everywhere, not just in the states that are smart enough to get out of the way. Republicans, listen up. Run on this, run hard, run loud. Because the American people are ready for prosperity. They can feel in their paychecks, not just hear about from some talking head on the news. This is where the rubber meets the road, my friends. The line between states that rise and states that decay. Between an economy that lifts all boats and one that drags down the whole country. Let's choose rising. Let's choose freedom. Let's abolish the state income tax and let America work again. And that's tonight's first word. Delgado, I'll give you first crack.
- [09:35]
C
My first crack will come via text message. Damon, from my. My brother in law. Former brother in law, but we still keep in touch. His name is Rich. He just left New York a few months ago and made his way back, or I should say made his way to Florida. And as he's hearing you talk about the, about the tax situation, he just texted me first word, amen. Because that's what he's experiencing in Florida. He got away from the New York high taxes as he's getting ready for retirement and he's taking advantage of the great climate, the great atmosphere that, you know, Governor DeSantis has created there in Florida.
- [10:09]
B
Yeah, he's rich in so many ways now.
- [10:11]
C
Yeah, no kidding. So, yeah, more people are doing this. I saw a friend of mine from high school, he just left California, a pretty red area, too near the coast. But he's high, tailing it. He's having a house built in Tennessee. Why? Because they got to get away from these things. And, you know, I'm just looking at you thinking, when are you taking the show south?
- [10:36]
B
It's already going south. What are you talking about?
- [10:38]
A
Let's see, my daughter's a junior and then she's a senior, then she's off to go two years. That's When?
- [10:44]
C
Tell her Florida's got some great school.
- [10:46]
B
He's not sending it to school in Florida.
- [10:49]
A
No, no. I don't know.
- [10:50]
B
They're going north.
- [10:51]
A
These people can't upset her at this point in junior year.
- [10:54]
B
Now, let her figure it out.
- [10:56]
A
Mr. Nolan, tax is theft.
- [10:59]
D
I mean, they could print it out of thin air why they taxed us. It's a joke. It's a way to siphon off all your work, your labor to keep you under their thumb. It's a joke. No man should work six months. No person should work six months out of the year for the government and the other six for your family. The whole thing's a disaster. We do not need it. Give us sovereign money and this big sham goes away. And then they don't get to collude all the power. Great, great first word.
- [11:28]
A
And I mean, I mean. So I, you know, I was just thinking about. I saw someone post some funny stuff, send us messages about my. The last couple shows me complaining non stop about the Republican Party, which I've done for 11 years. If you've watched the show, not just two weeks or two shows, but I was thinking again, like, what's the vision for the Republican Party? What are the big issues? Like, what are the big things that they're going to have vision on that they're going to go out there and talk about.
- [11:54]
D
Yeah. Wait for Trump's term to end and go back to business as usual. That's their big vision. That's all the rhinos care about.
- [12:04]
A
And I have to tell you, I don't know. President Trump gave an NBC News exclusive today. Well, at least that's how NBC put it out. An interview with him, I think. It's in the White House. It is in the White House. It's in the Oval. As I'm looking at it for the first time, the first clip I see is it says Trump. Breaking news. Trump says he's now adjusting his mass deportations policy to only go into cities if the mayors or governors ask and say please, adding, this is Trump speaking. I don't want to go and force ourselves into a city, even if the numbers are terrible.
- [12:50]
C
What I believe that's him basically saying, you want them, you got him. Deal with it. Whoa, right?
- [12:58]
A
Got who? The. The criminals.
- [12:59]
C
Yeah, you got the criminals. You got all this, this mayhem going on. You deal with it. Good luck, have fun. Let us know when you need us. That's the way I take that.
- [13:08]
A
Is that what people voted for? 13 past the hour, we'll discuss that. We'll watch that clip when we get back. We'll get into some other news. Live from Studio 6 right after this. Seventeen past the hour. Live from Studio six. Big glad you're in on a Wednesday night. Slick's gonna do sports. Delgado, Nolan, got news. Aaron friend holding it down as always. We'll get to everything. Let's just watch these two clips from this NBC exclusive from the White House, from the Oval Office. They sat down. Somebody here from NBC News sat down with President Trump and here's one of his answers that I was just referring to. And I'm really interested here. If where people are at? Are they with Delgado? And they're in. If. Well, let's listen to it and then we'll see where everybody's at. Here it is.
- [14:49]
B
So I want to be clear because it sounds like there is a shift in immigration enforcement here, that there's going to be a shift after Minneapolis. What should Americans expect going forward?
- [14:58]
E
Well, one thing I say to my people, you know, we do a good job. We don't get credit for it. I say they have to ask and they have to say please. When a city is going, who has to ask and who has to say please? For the governor? I don't want to go and force ourselves into a city, even if their numbers are terrible. Like for instance, I got a call from Jeff Landry, governor of Louisiana. He said, we have a big problem. Could you go in and help us with, well, let's see, certain sections, I mean, to be honest with you, certain sections of the state beyond their famous beautiful city, certain sections of the state, we have done not only in New Orleans, we've done a really great job in Louisiana. But I was called, I want to be called Chicago. We could solve the Chicago crime.
- [15:42]
B
Well, on that question, which cities are you headed to next?
- [15:46]
E
We have five cities that we're looking at very strongly. But we want to be invited. We will sometimes call the governors.
- [15:53]
B
Are they cities like Chicago, Philadelphia?
- [15:55]
E
Are these the cities? We could straighten out the crime in Chicago? We've already brought it down 25% just by being there. We could have Chicago be a safe city, just like DC Is a safe city, just like all of these places that we've gone to. And I look forward, you know, I didn't campaign on that. I campaigned on law and order. But I didn't think I'd be going into individual cities and making them safe.
- [16:17]
B
You can tell us about the five cities. The five cities.
- [16:19]
E
So Americans are ready announcing them very quickly. But we could do something as an Example, I was called by people San Francisco said, please, we have a Democrat mayor. He's trying very hard. Would you, friends of mine that live there, it's got crime problems. Would you let him do the job and not come in? Let's see how it works. I said, look, I can do it much quicker, much faster. Don't forget, we remove criminals. We took over 2,000 hardcore criminals out of Washington D.C. if we didn't do that, 2% of the people create 90% of the crime. Think of that 2%. So you have a criminal because it's over and over again. 2% create 90% of the crime. We took out 2,000 people, more than 2,000 people out of Washington, D.C. and we now have a safe city.
- [17:11]
A
Okay, so there's a little more context. There's the whole clip to 22 minutes and 24 seconds. So people voted for President Trump because we, we thought the biggest mass deportation effort in American history. Now does the first part of that clip. Now that's kind of, well, instead of just, we're going after the biggest mass deportation in history and we're going everywhere. Now we have to be invited say please. And if you're a blue, of course no blue governor or blue anything is going to ever ask because they don't. They want them all, they want to keep them all. That's their voting block. They're going to change the makeup of the country. Is that what we voted for? Or is it now you feel like it's changed? Delgado?
- [17:50]
C
I think it's a mix. I mean, it's exactly what we voted for. And he said it too, and he said it before. He wants to be invited in. He wants to be asked to come in and do the cleanup. If not, then if he sees it going south, then he'll take it upon himself, I think, to take those steps necessary that he thinks are needed to protect the American people. Is that a change? Hey, look, everything is dynamic, right? To be sit there and be like, no, this is my hard line. I can't ever change. Then you'll probably run into problems and you'll, you won't get anything done. But we've seen what this president does. He shoots for the, he shoots for the stars, but he takes home the moon. Meanwhile, the moon is what he wanted the whole time.
- [18:29]
A
Right? But isn't that get us to a point though, where realistically, what I've been complaining about, red state governors are not being as aggressive in red state enforcement policies with immigration as blue state is in breaking federal law, couldn't we just at that point then just say leave it to the individual governors to enforce to whatever level they want to in their state to, you know, go after these people. If they so called Florida can do it one way, Texas can do it another and New York City can do and can, can welcome all in and we'll never going to go in there.
- [18:57]
C
I, I think they're already doing that.
- [18:59]
A
Yep.
- [18:59]
C
Right. I mean we don't, we don't hear about what's happening in other states for a reason because they're all complying. They're all working with the ICE officials to get these people out. That's why you don't see what you see in Minneapolis around the country. And, and I think that's pain painfully obvious to the rest of the country. And you notice after last week when he sent to Holman and everybody thought, oh good, we got rid of the other guy and we got, you got home and you got, you got the guy who's, who's the granddaddy of this stuff. You didn't, you didn't do better. You didn't go, oh, we got, we got the, we got the weak guy to come in. No, you got the, he's, he's a tough mother, you know what? And he, he, I feel like, and I think I said this last week, Damon, you aren't on the show. I feel like between the conversations Trump had with Walt Fry and with Homan, I feel like they, they pulled those two aside and showed him the picture of their house. You know, what he did to the, to Putin and what did to the, the guy from Afghanistan show him a picture of their house. I don't know what that picture looked like, but all of a sudden you don't see these guys. You don't see Waltz. You don't see Fry tearing things up with the rhetoric jumping out on, on TV every single, every single day, four or five times a day, screaming about ice. You just don't see it. Why I think he showed him a picture of their house and they backed off because Holman is talk, is talking like, hey, we're getting unprecedented help. I got a clip from him later we'll play.
- [20:31]
A
Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I don't know. I mean I'm looking at other clips that are coming out of this, of this interview. He's him saying we need to take a softer touch with illegal immigrants. And he's saying the reporter said is your mission now to deport everyone who came in illegally. And I would have thought that Would have been a one word answer of yes. Instead he said, we are totally focused on criminals, really bad criminals. Now, you could say people that came in illegally are criminals, but I'm talking about murderers from different countries. I mean, I don't know. We'll see what the reaction is to this interview. From the clips I've seen here early on, they've only been out for about an hour. But I just can't see how conservatives are going to be happy with this interview at all. But this is supposed to be, this is classified as an invasion. It's not immigration. All of a sudden, now we sound like we're treating it as immigration, like, well, you can stay there if they're okay with it. And Paul?
- [21:22]
D
Well, for me, there's a couple of things to address. One, the question comes down to, is the midterms the most important thing? And if you're losing some public sentiment, I think you have to, you know, live in this war of optics. And the problem with the war of optics is it's so skewed. You know, he's playing on a tilted sheet of ice and everything is leftist and endless leftist affiliates constantly, you know, pummeling his, his plan. Now the border got closed, which is great. The criminals getting booted is great. But it comes down, is the juice worth the squeeze? When you see how mobilized all of these leftist radical organizations are, and they're growing, you know, we're seeing what they've done with getting candidates like Mandami in there. The communist movement in America uses this as an excuse to, to mobilize. So I, I think for now, if you kind of like tone down the rhetoric, it's somewhat of a win. You get rid of the criminals. You put it in a binary question of, you know, to these blue state people, hey, you want the violent people there? No problem. Let the crime soar and let the people stand up and say, we can't have this, make the cities unlivable. Let it work out the way it does. To me, I'm okay with backing off for now.
- [22:42]
A
I.
- [22:43]
D
When it comes to politics, when it comes to business, sometimes you got to lose a battle to win a war. And there's times where you want to simply just no problem, you got it. This is what you want. No problem. Let it unfold. After the midterms, I would like to see him go ball, you know.
- [23:03]
F
Ball.
- [23:03]
C
To the walls, to the wall.
- [23:08]
D
So I'm okay with, you know, when it comes to just strategic playing this, keeping that border closed is huge. Getting rid of the animals. Huge. Letting the blue cities self destruct. Not so bad.
- [23:22]
G
Yeah.
- [23:22]
A
Okay.
- [23:22]
C
That's what you voted for.
- [23:24]
A
Definitely not on board with the two of you, but that's fine. County Commissioner Lake County, Florida, District 1 Republican Anthony Sabatini is out with his first reaction to the eclipse. What in the actual F is this? This is going to go down as the single largest betrayal in the history of the United States. That would be the first one I found. And I guess we'll go, we'll go from there live. Studio 6B. We'll do some sports news back right after this. All right. 30 minutes past the hour. Live from Studio 6P, let's do some sports. Sports is brought to you by Mike Lindell. LFS6P is the promo code to use Slick Scott Sports. What's going on?
- [24:23]
B
I think we saw a little touch of that last interview on the story that's coming up right here. Now. President Trump to sit down for a Super bowl interview with NBC Nightly News Dylan Gwynne at Breitbart. President Trump will not be attending Super Bowl 60 in person, but that doesn't mean the millions watching won't see him. The president will sit for an interview with NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Lamas during the super bowl pregame show. The interview will air on both NBC and Peacock. According to NBC, the segment that appears before the super bowl will be part of a longer, wide ranging interview taped on Wednesday at the White House awful announcing reports. A portion of the interview will air on NBC Nightly News with Tom Lamas at 6:30 and an extended version will stream on Top Story with Tom Lamas on NBC now at 7:00pm well, many have speculated that Trump decided not to attend the super bowl because the NFL chose anti ice rapper Bad Bunny to perform the halftime show. Trump insists distance was the primary factor. However, he's certainly no fan of Bad Bunny. No surprise there, right? The tradition of presidents conducting interviews before the super bowl has continued almost uninterrupted for over 20 years. Notably, President Trump himself declined an interview on NBC News back in 2018. In some instances, sportscasters have conducted the interviews and those conversations. Harry Maine, relatively lighthearted. The fact that NBC Nightly News anchor will conduct this weekend's interview may signal that it will take on more of a serious tone. And that's pretty much the story on that Big D. So that should be interesting. I think Rick has some clips he's going to have in an upcoming segment as well. A little bit more background on this story. But President Trump, indeed. And you called it big D, you thought he was going to do it. Last week you said he was going to be on. So that may be the best part of the super bowl because I'm not sure how good a game we're going to get. And we sure as hell aren't going to get a good halftime show unless we watch Kid Rock and turning point USA's performance right here on America's Voice. Real America's Voice. So I'm excited about that. And one more story.
- [26:08]
A
You don't think we're going to get a good game?
- [26:10]
B
I don't know if we're going to get a good game with that. I think Seattle might roll that game. I really think it's going to be a role.
- [26:14]
D
Everybody's saying that.
- [26:15]
A
Yeah.
- [26:16]
B
Yeah. I don't know. That could be all the reason. Damon's going to be putting heavy money on the Patriots.
- [26:22]
C
I'm going to follow Damon.
- [26:23]
B
Everyone's thinking about betting him too. I think she's.
- [26:25]
D
She's.
- [26:26]
B
She's rolling. I don't think Aaron could bet the Patriots.
- [26:28]
C
We'll see.
- [26:28]
B
Odds make is coming up big Odds make is Friday night at the warehouse. It's going to be something we're going to have. How many different prop bets? We got a couple of prop bets too, right? Big D going to work a few.
- [26:37]
A
150.
- [26:38]
B
150. Aaron. Here you go.
- [26:40]
C
Oh, boy.
- [26:41]
B
Oh, boy.
- [26:42]
C
Two hours of prop.
- [26:43]
A
No, you're going to do. We're going to pick side. We're going to pick total in your top over under five prop bets.
- [26:49]
B
Okay. We should do over on that then.
- [26:50]
A
Have all five prop bets as one. You know, one pick right here.
- [26:53]
C
We have to do an over under for Paul.
- [26:54]
B
Bad bunny wears a dress. Yes or no?
- [26:57]
C
You mean a parlay?
- [26:58]
A
Damon Gatorade color.
- [27:00]
B
Get a rig.
- [27:01]
C
Oh, yeah. You're really good at those, Rick. Carl gotta the pre made ones.
- [27:04]
A
All right. What else?
- [27:05]
B
All right. Well, equal. Equal Employment Agency launches investigation into Nike for anti white discrimination. This is Elizabeth Weibull of Breitbart.
- [27:13]
A
Well, well, well.
- [27:15]
B
That's right, Paul. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, eeoc, another acronym, just what we needed. Has launched an investigation into Nike over allegations of discrimination against white employees and applicants, according to multiple reports. In a motion filed by the EEOC on Wednesday, the agency revealed that seeking information directly relevant to the allegations that Nike subjected white employees, applicants and training program participants to disparate treatment based on race and various employment decisions. The New York Post Times said. The New York Times said. Excuse me. The motion filed on Wednesday reportedly Seeks to force Nike to comply with a subpoena from September. According to the outlet, the EEOC seeks information directly relevant to the allegations that Nike subjected white employees, applicants and training program participants to. It's the same thing. I'm sorry, I read the same thing twice. I don't know why. For the outlet, the investigation into Nike's alleged discrimination of white employees and applicants comes as the company has been going through a difficult time and is trying to recover after strategic missteps in recent years left it in a long sales rut. So apparently Nike's having a problem, if you can believe that one. The scrutiny comes at a difficult time for Nike, the world's largest athletic wear company. In 2021, Nike represented a five year plan for a more diverse workforce. Management tied some executive compensation to diversity objectives, which included representation for women in leadership positions and a target of 35% representation of racial minorities in its US workforce. CNN reported that EEOC said it's requesting information from Nike going back to 2018 over race based work representation quotas. So in other words, they had to go out and hire more diversity. And obviously the white people got the back seat, so to speak. And now the agency is looking into this. So I think it's. It's a good situation. They filed the enforcement action after Nike failed to voluntarily provide all the information required by the subpoena, according to the outlet. So we'll follow the story. It just broke today and we'll see how this goes. Big day. But Nike, no surprise to many of us, may be on the clock for something wrongdoing and racially motivated.
- [29:13]
A
Okay, very good, sports. All right, Very good. I just found this. And this is from their official channel. Kamala headquarters. Official channel.
- [29:23]
B
There is one.
- [29:24]
A
Put this up. Aaron, look at this. Kamala hq. Password. No good. The babysitter is weird. No good. Project 2025 was real. No good. Headquarters logging you in tomorrow.
- [29:42]
C
Oh.
- [29:45]
A
Little announcement tomorrow from the former vice president. Maybe.
- [29:49]
C
Maybe she's being unburdened by something.
- [29:52]
A
She's going to be unburdened to come back and try again. A little early for that announcement.
- [29:59]
D
Maybe she needs.
- [30:00]
B
She probably needs some money.
- [30:03]
C
Or maybe she's doing more interviews at McDonald's like we saw yesterday.
- [30:07]
A
Yeah.
- [30:08]
B
Really?
- [30:08]
A
That was a good one.
- [30:09]
D
So could you imagine if we had to listen to her voice this whole time?
- [30:12]
B
Oh, my God. How many Venn diagrams can we handle?
- [30:17]
A
Paul, Nolan's got some news here. Quickly. Not quickly. We got plenty of time. What's going on, Paul?
- [30:21]
D
Well, Hawk 2, Jeffries and Schmucky Duma who are talking about judicial warrants and face masks and the deployment of ICE agents and the Fourth Amendment and. Well, let their stupidity talk for themselves. Let it go. Roll it. Roll it.
- [30:38]
G
Hold on a second.
- [30:40]
A
The speaker has already rejected.
- [30:42]
D
What's his comment?
- [30:43]
C
Judicial warrants and removing face masks. So if that's still his position, will you vote to shut the government down, Shut the Department of Homeland Security down if he stays sticks to that position?
- [30:55]
G
Mike Johnson and John Thune rejected the notion that the six appropriations bill. They rejected that notion. And I'm thankful for what Leader Schumer and Senate Democrats did, which is to draw a line in the sand and say, no, it's not going to go down that way. And that's why we're at this moment. So understand something. We get it over in the House. Mike Johnson and John Thune aren't working for the American people. They work for Donald Trump. And so many of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, they function like a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trump cartel. So at the end of the day, listen, Trump understands President Trump to you public is not with the administration's cruel and chaotic policies here and that we actually need to restore law and order as it relates to how we proceed. And we're ready to proceed in good faith to sit down. Mike Johnson has articulated unreasonable positions. He's actually supporting the notion that mass and lawless ICE agents should be deployed in communities throughout America. That's Mike Johnson's position. That's contrary to what the American people believe should be taking place. Mike Johnson called the Fourth Amendment an inconvenience. It's not an inconvenience. It's part of the fabric and DNA of our country. Just like the First Amendment. Yes. Even the Second Amendment, the 10th Amendment, the Fourth Amendment. We're standing up for all of these constitutional privileges that have been part of who we are since the very beginning as we celebrate our 200.
- [32:31]
E
He's laughing.
- [32:32]
G
Birthday, Chuck.
- [32:33]
B
I'm just going to say we're sending.
- [32:35]
G
Them a proposal and we await their response.
- [32:38]
B
But I think the American people are going to be amazed.
- [32:43]
C
Whatever reptile reptiles look at that tie.
- [32:45]
B
Says, what is the point of secret.
- [32:47]
D
Police should put that tie in our cities over that. Look, this is the same guy who was, you know, telling us 15 years ago that illegals are bane on society and they're taking away from his constituents.
- [33:01]
A
But of course, here, here's the issue. The issue is, why not take this line? Why not now go on the Offensive. The Republicans just signed into law Biden level spending. They've taken all their leverage off the table. So if you're the Democrats, why not take this position now? What are the Republicans going to do? They're not going to hold anything over your head to get funding for ICE or anything or whatever. You know, they have no leverage, so why not? They're gonna, they're gonna find their narrative like they always do, whether it's the, whether it's the shutdown or whether it's spending bills. And now it's gonna be ICE and it's gonna be, why not? And now you have the president saying, well, maybe we need to take a softer touch. They're going, yep, see, told you. That's gonna be their narrative. And why shouldn't it be that they always have to find a bad guy and they're going to find the bad guy easily. It's all the Republicans and the president. And then they're going to point to their behavior and they're going to go, you see? Do you think he's doing it? They realize how bad it was. They realize how, how they violated every, every law under the sun. Now they're softening their stance. Now they're only going to go after criminals. They're not going after the poor family with the two kids anymore like they were doing because they knew that was wrong. And you, the public, you don't like this.
- [34:23]
C
Damon, I feel like you really believe him.
- [34:26]
A
Well, why wouldn't you do that?
- [34:28]
C
Because Hakeem Jeffries is a stone cold liar.
- [34:30]
A
It's not bad. It's not about being a liar.
- [34:32]
C
But that's not being a liar.
- [34:34]
A
It is about being a liar. It's going out there and lying.
- [34:37]
C
Yes, they're going after too many people who believe it. Exactly. That's why we're here talking about it, to point out that, hey, this guy is lying.
- [34:45]
D
Too many people believe that ICE is going into house and slaughtering 5 year olds, arresting 5 year olds, children in schools.
- [34:53]
H
The.
- [34:53]
D
I watch a lot of the leftist propaganda and it's effective. I put something on my page. 10 complete lies that made it all through CNN and New York Times and all the mainstream liberal slop. People are buying it.
- [35:11]
C
You know why? And you know why they're buying it? Because the media is parody. Don't push back. They don't call them out. They don't challenge them the way the media is supposed to because they're all in bed together.
- [35:22]
A
But they've never done that.
- [35:23]
C
No, they have. They used to do it. But it turned about 20, 20 plus years ago. Where it seriously turned during the, during.
- [35:31]
D
The war was over 2008, it began 2012. It was done.
- [35:36]
C
It actually started during the Clinton administration, actually probably even before that.
- [35:41]
D
Because remember, the social engineering program in America started in 2008 and went into full programming in 2012. I mean, it's a. I forgot the name of the operation, but there's always been media bias. But CNN in 1996, you could actually watch it. What we saw in the last 14 years has been an absolute nightmare, an abject disaster, a divide and conquer like sorcery.
- [36:07]
A
But again, my question was to you guys. Why would you not take this tact? If you're him and them, what do.
- [36:14]
D
You think helps him win a midterm? Better take it a softer stance or a harder stance.
- [36:19]
A
The Democrats.
- [36:20]
E
No, I'm talking about.
- [36:21]
A
I'm talking about them, though. I'm talking about what he just did there. Why not take that line?
- [36:26]
C
Well, that's always been their line, right?
- [36:28]
D
It seems always been.
- [36:29]
C
Their line is to. Is to make you believe, you know, up is down, wet is dry, black is white. That has been there. That, that is their. That is how they operate. And they do it all the time because they know they have the low information voter who just reads a headline and goes, yeah, and that's it. That's all they do. They don't get past the headline because that's all they needed to stroke that fire. And of course, that's who they're talking to when you have a media that carries the water for them constantly and just keeps publicizing.
- [37:02]
A
No, they're talking to independents, too. They're talking to people who are on the fence of what's going on. They're talking to a lot of different people.
- [37:08]
C
Yeah. And I go back to Paul's. What was that CIA thing where the guy just kind of got along to get along?
- [37:16]
D
Yeah, the ash experiment.
- [37:17]
C
Yeah, the ash experiment. This is, this is all psychological.
- [37:21]
D
That's why they keep repeating the same lie over and over and over until they're like, oh, it's got to be it.
- [37:28]
A
All right. 43 past the hour, live from Studio 6B. We're back right after this.
- [37:46]
D
Sam.
- [38:17]
A
To the hour from Studio 6B. Slick's doing sports. Paul Nolan's gonna do some more stories. Aaron and Fran holding it down as always. And of course, you live from Studio 60. Audience, wherever you're watching, Rumble X, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch, kick Getter, wherever you're watching, we appreciate it. Make sure you hit the like and subscribe. Follow the channel, engage with the channel. That's what we want. Comment, let us know where you're watching from. We always love that. Let's do some headline news. Rick Delgado's got it. What's going on, Delgado?
- [38:46]
C
All right, Damon. Well, this one broke this morning. I don't know if you saw as the man who plotted to assassinate President Donald Trump in his Florida golf course, Ryan Routh, convicted in September of trying to kill then President Trump today was sentenced to life in prison plus seven years, according to journalists in the courtroom. Judge Aileen Cannon handed down the sentence of life plus seven years after a 90 minute hearing, saying it was to protect the public from future crime committed by Ralph. Ralph was arrested on September 15, 2024. If the secret Service agent saw the barrel of a gun poking through the bushes at the perimeter of the West Palm beach golf course where Trump was playing around ahead of the November election. The agent opened fire on Ralph, who fled to a vehicle and was arrested shortly thereafter. The sentencing, it was a culmination of the trial that featured Routh representing himself despite no legal training. And yeah, he couldn't ask for a happier ending to a terrible story as this guy, this dirtbag, this CIA ass had prob gets life in prison. We'll see how long he lasts because I don't know if they want him in there too long with his is gums flapping. They were talking about this with Cash Patel but also on Fox News Brett Baer was talking about this and also asked Cash Patel what we don't know about the other shooter. We're talking about the shooter in Butler here is cut number five. And he brings up a great point because we still don't know a lot about this cut number five. Check this out.
- [40:16]
A
I mean I don't think we the public have a more robust picture of of that shooter.
- [40:22]
C
Well, I think that's an unfair supposition. We the FBI have put out all the information that we possibly and legally can while protecting any ongoing matters that are unrelated.
- [40:32]
A
But he's dead.
- [40:34]
C
Well, yes, he's very much dead. But at the same time, Brett, we at the FBI have to follow the parameters of our investigation and what the law allows to us us to release.
- [40:42]
B
I get it.
- [40:42]
A
But you know, what were the cell phones? Why don't we know who he was talking to? You know, what exactly happened?
- [40:48]
D
I feel like we haven't gotten the.
- [40:50]
A
Whole picture about Butler even now.
- [40:52]
C
But here's the thing, Brett, there we can provide and just an example here we've provided 40,000 pages of documents to Congress. That's a 400% increase from the prior two directors. We will continue to provide this information with our partners on Capitol Hill when we are legally able to. It's never going to be enough for everyone. It's never going to be enough. But what we are saying is we're not saying trust us, we're saying we did an exhaustive search of that. We presented that information to the Department of Justice and a decision was made on what to release. Yeah. Which was to release nothing. And we have no information. Because this is probably a little bit deeper than anybody wants to admit.
- [41:28]
A
Well, I mean, the President of. The President of the United States was asked about this months ago, and he said he was happy with, with what they've done so far on the case and what he's been told. He said, or maybe he used the word satisfied. I have to go back and look. I mean, if the President wanted this, I mean, I would think the President could be as aggressive with his FBI director as he wanted to, since it's well about him to get this more out into the public or more information to the public if he felt that's what he wanted to do. And it was there. But I think he was asked. I mean, again, I'll go back and look, but I'm pretty sure he was asked about this quite some time ago now. More time has passed and we know nothing. And he said, I think he used the word. I was sat. He was satisfied.
- [42:17]
D
So who do you think you think Ryan Roth was? Intelligentsia. Do you believe he was part of a, A community intelligence community that answers to a different group of leadership?
- [42:37]
A
You're asking me?
- [42:38]
D
Yeah, of course.
- [42:40]
A
I have no idea. No, I would, I mean, I wouldn't.
- [42:42]
D
Think that you just think he's a random guy who just arrangement.
- [42:48]
A
I mean, I would lean towards that. Yeah.
- [42:50]
D
Okay.
- [42:51]
B
Lee Harvey Oswald.
- [42:53]
C
Yeah. Unfortunately, his background doesn't really hold up to that kind of scrutiny. When you talk about.
- [43:00]
A
Well, what, what holds up to what kind of scrutiny? We don't know anything.
- [43:02]
C
All his trips back and forth to Afghanistan, a new House credentials.
- [43:07]
D
He's been CIA in the past. He, he was recruiting people for the Afghan, I mean, for the Ukrainian war. And this guy was connected to so many different agencies. Some of his funding came from communist organizations. This guy was really politically juiced up. And to be able to park yourself on the side of the golf course with a. To snipe a president. It doesn't sound like TDS to me. That Sounds like operative, mercenary, but, you know, I'm just a tinfoil hat wearing.
- [43:39]
C
Exactly.
- [43:40]
B
Thank God for that Secret Service agent man. He is a hero.
- [43:43]
C
Anyhow, as we jump over to New York City, Damon, check this out. As Mamdani. That's Mayor Mamdani to you and me. The communist mayor of New York City is calling on the District Attorney not to prosecute the man shot by police during an alleged knife attack. So the guy attacks police with a knife and gets shot. But of course, Mayor Mumdani comes to his rescue. He said yesterday does not believe that the Queens District Attorney should prosecute a mentally ill man who was shot by police as he allegedly ran towards the officers with a knife. It's not alleged if you watch the video because there is a. There is a video of this. You'll see the guy come at the. At the police with a knife. Jabez Chaka Bordeaux was holding a large chicken knife and charged at officers who responded to an emergency call from the family on January 26th. NYPD officials said if the officers repeatedly told him to drop it as they attempted to de escalate the situation before one officer fired several shots, striking Shaka Bordy, who was then taken to the hospital in critical condition. Here is cut number one. Here's. Here's what you voted for New York. You're getting it good and hard. Here is Mayor Mamdani. Cut number one. Check this out. And as you said, I spoke with the Chakraborty family and I visited Chavez in the hospital and there is no family in the hospital should have to endure this kind of pain. Put the knife down. 6.
- [45:17]
B
Put the knife down.
- [45:18]
C
Put the knife down. Eight times he told the guy to put the knife down. But there you go, New York City, your mayor running to the bedside of the criminal who attacked police with a large chicken. Large kitchen knife, I should say.
- [45:35]
A
A large chicken.
- [45:36]
C
Yeah, large chicken and a knife. He had things in both hands the.
- [45:40]
B
Buck stops seeing after with.
- [45:42]
A
By the way, back to the Trump thing for just a second, two things. Number one, I think we're talking about.
- [45:45]
H
About.
- [45:45]
A
You guys are talking about the guy at the golf course. I was talking about the picture they put up. I think is the shooter in Butler.
- [45:50]
D
Weren't they talking about Ryan Ralph was the one who got sentenced. Yeah, that's the guy.
- [45:55]
A
Of course.
- [45:56]
D
Yeah, that's the little kid.
- [45:57]
A
When he was put up, the picture of the kid in Butler, I think he did.
- [46:01]
C
And that's why I was talking about.
- [46:03]
A
The kid in Butler. That case that we don't that was the one President Trump was asked about and said, I'm satisfied.
- [46:08]
C
Right. And that's the one that actually has even more questions to it because again, you go back to the multiple cell phones.
- [46:14]
A
Right.
- [46:15]
C
And the overseas.
- [46:16]
A
Here's my second question. So according to you guys, since you think, I guess, it's so easy to put this all together, do you think that the Trump and Cash have put it all together and just hiding it from everybody?
- [46:27]
C
Well, so I don't think they're telling them everything.
- [46:31]
A
You know, Cash is keeping it from him or they both know and they're just like, we're not going to let anybody know.
- [46:35]
C
He said he presented it to the Department of Justice and who knows where it goes from there.
- [46:42]
D
I just think the intelligence agencies have way more juice than. Than the FBI, really. And Cash Patel, but more so any sitting president and any leader that these intelligence agencies have, like, they have black operative, like mercenary groups, they could just pay these contractors. I mean, these guys are pros. I just don't think. And if they're a. They're under the radar and above the law. Like, to me, it's been going on forever. We've seen it in, you know, we've seen presidents get whacked. I, I don't. I think you're underestimating the power of CIA.
- [47:20]
A
So it's beyond above. It's above Cash. I mean, it's not.
- [47:23]
D
The.
- [47:23]
A
Cash and Trump are together and they know all the details and they're just not saying anything. You think it's even above Cash?
- [47:29]
D
I think it's way above Cash.
- [47:30]
A
Okay, gotcha. All right, let's take a break. Oh, that's our wrap on hour one. Hour two coming back fast.
- [47:37]
C
That's one hour.
- [47:38]
B
That's fast.
- [47:57]
C
Sam.
- [48:26]
A
When I'm not bartending, I'm watching live from Studio 6B. Monday through Friday at 8pm. All right, hour two, nine o'. Clock. Live from Studio 6B. We're just in the break. We are what? Savannah Guthrie has now put out a video her, her sister and her brother about their mother, who I guess now is. What is this? Day four, day fourth.
- [48:50]
C
Fourth day. Fourth day missing for the fourth day. Media outlets are reporting they're receiving ransom letters.
- [48:56]
A
Besides it being absolutely heartbreaking, gut wrenching to watch.
- [49:00]
D
Gut wrenching.
- [49:03]
A
If I put the emotional part aside, it does seem that there, there's got to be a reason they're putting this out. It would seem to me that maybe they think there's. There's some, Some. Some lead on a trail or something. Or they think that maybe she's still alive and they're making some headway and maybe trying to figure out where she is. Because they say in this video that we hear, like all of you, that there might be a ransom note. And she says, we are ready to talk.
- [49:33]
B
Yeah.
- [49:34]
A
I mean, that's very specific language. She says, we. We need to know without a doubt, though, that she is alive and yet you have her. We want to hear from you and we are ready to listen. Please reach out to us.
- [49:50]
C
Yeah. On the way in tonight, I heard an FBI investigator talking about this, saying that the police are releasing very few details, which means they're keeping a lot of stuff close to the vest. And that if these ransom notes are true, then what this is is request for proof of life, basically.
- [50:11]
A
Right?
- [50:12]
D
Yep. Yeah.
- [50:14]
A
Oh, well, I just. Man, it's just gut wrenching story that's out there. She just put it out about 37 minutes ago or so. Yeah.
- [50:23]
C
And it said the. The police descended again on the sister's house. Yet again. Wow. And I don't know why they didn't. They didn't offer any insight into that.
- [50:34]
B
Well, it's an investigation. They're not going to probably.
- [50:38]
C
So.
- [50:39]
A
Yeah. All right. Well, our thoughts and prayers are. Well, we hope. We. I really hope they find her. I really hope they find her and.
- [50:46]
B
Alive and in good condition.
- [50:48]
C
Yeah. Because according to. According to this as well, 24 hours would be a long time for her to be off medication. It's now four days.
- [50:57]
A
Yeah.
- [50:58]
C
So you can imagine what this poor woman could be going through. Yeah.
- [51:02]
A
All right, let's do some news. Paul Nolan. Then we'll do some sports with Slick Rick. James o'.
- [51:06]
C
Keefe.
- [51:07]
A
Paul. What's he up to?
- [51:08]
D
This James o' Keefe has some good undercover video. Again, you know, in talking about, you know, an FBI official admits that Cash Patel's not going to do anything. Basically said he was lazy and said that no one's going to go to jail. No. And no charges will likely go through. It's cut three. Let's roll it in and we'll discuss it.
- [51:30]
C
I hear he's like a diva. 110% he's a diva.
- [51:35]
A
Are you serious?
- [51:36]
C
110. He's lazy as hell. He's not good at his job.
- [51:40]
B
I've said that if arrests do not happen, if people are not held to.
- [51:43]
C
Account, then we'll have no choice but.
- [51:45]
B
To investigate the investigators themselves.
- [51:48]
C
I am a security specialist at the FBI, so I do background checks, investigations that type of stuff. I've been working there for five years now. You see camera, this FBI security specialist.
- [51:59]
B
Tells us the quiet part out loud.
- [52:02]
C
You don't think there's going to be any, like, major arrests, like with.
- [52:08]
A
FBI?
- [52:09]
C
No. Also nobody.
- [52:10]
B
I don't think anybody would ever go to prison.
- [52:13]
F
Wow.
- [52:14]
D
You know what else is new? I mean, does that shock anybody? That somebody from the government says. Nobody's going to arrest somebody from the government, so we'll see what happens. Fraud is just getting worse and worse. And it's just, you know, you're doing your taxes, everyone's filling them out, and you're thinking, what. What nefarious program is my money going to? You know, I sure would like to buy my kid GI Joe with the kung fu grip. But no, no, I'm going to buy a Somali daycare center, not get a piece of the action. So tired of it. It's just so infuriating.
- [52:50]
A
So, I mean, worse than that, if. It can be worse than that is if. God, there's going to be, at some point another Democratic administration. God forbid they ever hold all three again. I mean, you think the last five years, four years was bad? They get away with it, and nobody pays any price for anything they did to President Trump, to conservatives around the country. You think the last four years was bad?
- [53:20]
D
I mean, think about us.
- [53:21]
A
You ain't seen nothing yet.
- [53:22]
D
We all get debanked. What happens next time around when they're fully emboldened? Yeah, I mean, we're barely, you know, it's not like, you know, we're. We're making huge waves. Can't post on Facebook. You know, what's next? You know, they debank you. What do you do? How do you. How do you deal with society without being able to bank? So I don't know, man. I think these midterms are so important. Well, I know they are. It's an understatement. But I'm just. I don't know. I just want to see him just do whatever he has to do to get, you know, through this. And then all I care is drop the hammer on everybody.
- [54:03]
A
Five minutes past the hour. Live from Studio 6B, let's do some sports. Sports is brought to you by Mike Lindell. LFS6B is the promo code to use. Slickster. What's going on?
- [54:10]
B
Okay. Detroit lions fan files $100 million defamation suit against Steelers DK Metcalf and others.
- [54:17]
A
What was that? Shoot for the moon and settle for the stars, or.
- [54:20]
C
No, shoot for the stars, settle for the moon.
- [54:22]
A
Here you go for this one.
- [54:23]
B
Should have a lot of blue moons.
- [54:24]
A
But how about you take 5 million? You got it.
- [54:27]
B
Thank you. Tickets too, right?
- [54:29]
D
Shoot for the stars and settle for.
- [54:31]
B
A He's already negotiated the case.
- [54:34]
D
Paul Boy.
- [54:34]
B
A bright boy. Ryan Kennedy. Remember that name? The Detroit Lions fan allegedly grabbed by Steelers wide receiver DK Metcalf last year has filed $100 million defamation suit against Shannon Sharp and Chad Johnson. In December of last year, DK Metcalf, wide receiver for the Pittsburgh Steelers, was suspended for two games after he engaged in conduct detrimental to the NFL for initiating a physical confrontation with a fan. Metcalfe claimed that Ryan Kennedy used a racial slur, which Kennedy vehemently denied. According to Sports Illustrated, Kennedy filed suit against former NFL wide receiver Chad Johnson, Ochocinko, right Media company along with Shannon Sharp for making disparaging remarks about Kennedy on the Nightcap podcast. The lawsuit also includes DK Metcalf and others. They threw them in there too. The lawsuit alleges that Johnson, appearing on the widely viewed Nightcap podcast co hosted by Shannon Sharp, falsely claimed that Kennedy called Metcalfe the N word and referred to Metcalfe's mother using a vile, misogynistic slur, statements that Kennedy categorically denies and that no video audience audio evidence supports, Joe Marco, Kennedy's attorney, said in a statement. Marco said the accusation against Kennedy were false and caused significant damage to his reputation and mortgage company. Apparently the guy's a business owner. The false allegations, which were republished by major outlets including ESPN, Yahoo, USA Today, etc. Went viral across social media platforms with millions of views branding Kennedy as a racist on a national scale and subjecting him to death threats, hate mail and severe damage to his business reputation, marco said. Following the incident at Fort Field, Kennedy held a press conference with his attorney, Shawn Head, who said that his client suffered severe reputational harm. And after the assault, false accusations of racism and racial slurs were made publicly. As a result, Ryan Kennedy and his family have received threats, they've been harassed and his business has been damaged. Repeating basically what they just said, we've asked that those false accusations be corrected. As of this morning, we have not received a response. Mitzv Metcalf does have the ability to explain that was not said so very interesting to see what happens. I think they'll probably get an apology and maybe a nice little check. I'm not sure.
- [56:37]
C
Sure.
- [56:37]
B
But that's crazy stuff, man. We'll see how that goes. And getting back to the Savannah Guthrie story, NBC's Mike Tirico is heartbroken over disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mother this is Ryan Gatos of Fox News. Longtime sportscaster Mike Tirico said Tuesday he was heartbroken over the disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mother Nancy in Arizona as he spoke to reporters ahead of Super Bowl 60. We know the story as far as what had happened, but Savannah Guthrie was actually set to cover the 2026 Milan Cortina Olympics for NBC. First and foremost, my heart breaks and our hearts break. It's been a pit in the stomach for 36 hours since we found out, Tirico said via Talksport. Can't believe the situation. Lucky enough to work multiple Olympics with Savannah and get to know the Today show team and sit in for Craig for a few days this past past year. All those people, just highest professionals but with highest personal regard. What you see on the set of today's show, those people are real. Those people are special people. And we're just heartbroken and devastated and praying for Savannah and her entire family through this difficult time. And obviously we talked about it earlier but the hearts are with her and yes, she actually is obviously not going to be covering the Olympics which start in about what, a week? Not even less than a week. So crazy stuff, Big D. And that's a wrap in sports for now.
- [57:49]
A
All right, Slick Sports brought to you by Mike Lindell, LFS6B. I mean the Guthrie story is just, man, I just, just to think that they targeted an 84 year old woman.
- [58:00]
B
That's what's most hopeful.
- [58:01]
A
If that ends up being what happened in this whole ransom thing is, is true, is just frightening. It's just crazy. Can you even remember anything like this, a story or of a someone who's that public on the biggest, I mean one of the biggest morning shows for that many years who's so well known mother living so far away from where they obviously are and live and do and do and you know, their job and they target an 84 year old woman in her sleep and on the other side of the country, I don't know, it's just crazy. Right?
- [58:37]
C
You know what, there's two ways of looking at this. And hopefully, and I say hopefully that's the case because you don't want it to be something where somebody in the family had anything to do with this. Right? Yeah, of course that's why, that's why, you know, it sounds weird to say but hopefully that's the case that it was some, some, some people that are not affiliated with them because that would be, the other scenario would be a Million times worse.
- [59:00]
B
Right. You said they investigated or we're back at the sister's house. Right.
- [59:04]
C
This house, removing some stuff.
- [59:05]
A
Obviously, another sister. Because that was a sister, too. Obviously.
- [59:08]
D
Yeah.
- [59:09]
B
Is there another sister?
- [59:10]
C
No, there's, there's two. There's her and her sister and her brother who just flew in. I guess he's a.
- [59:15]
A
So the police were at. The girl who was just on video with Savannah is a sister.
- [59:19]
B
Yeah, they were at her house again, Rick said today.
- [59:22]
C
Yeah.
- [59:22]
B
Or yesterday.
- [59:23]
A
Okay, man. That doesn't mean it was for nefarious reasons. They could have just been trying. They've been to all of their houses.
- [59:28]
B
Could have been trying to get DNA, you know, whatever, whatever.
- [59:31]
A
I don't know. It's just disturbing, that, that story. All right, let's do some more headlines with Delgado. What's going on, Rick?
- [59:37]
C
All right. Well, speaking of the big game coming up on this Sunday, President Trump, as Slick alluded to earlier, is going to be interviewed by NBC for the super bowl tradition that the president usually does an interview just before a Super Bowl. And keeping with that tradition, President Trump sat down with NBC's anchor Tom Lamas earlier today. We have a few of the clips. I'll, I'll get to at least one here before we have to break. Here is President Trump, cut number six, talking about the, the new Fed chairman and federal. And the Fed and rates as well, interest rates here. What he had to say on this. Here's cut number six. Check this out.
- [60:14]
B
Is there any doubt in your mind.
- [60:16]
C
That interest rates are going to be lowered?
- [60:18]
E
Not much.
- [60:19]
H
Why?
- [60:20]
B
How can you say that?
- [60:21]
E
Going to be lower? To me they should.
- [60:23]
B
Your new Fed pick on board with that?
- [60:24]
C
We're way high.
- [60:25]
E
Okay. We're way high in interest.
- [60:27]
B
Does your new Fed pick understand that you want him to lower interest rates?
- [60:30]
E
I think he does, but I think he wants to anyway. I mean, if he came in and said, I want to raise him, we.
- [60:35]
B
Said that he would have gotten the job.
- [60:36]
E
He would not have gotten a job. No.
- [60:40]
D
Say it out loud.
- [60:41]
A
We, we have not talked about the fact that I missed out On, I think 180,000 if I had bet him the first night I talked.
- [60:48]
D
I talked about.
- [60:48]
B
Be kidding me.
- [60:49]
D
I talked about it Friday night when you were. I was making fun of you.
- [60:52]
C
Yeah.
- [60:53]
D
You blew it.
- [60:54]
A
I'd love to go back and look at that show. I can't remember when it was. It has to be, what, five, six months ago?
- [60:59]
C
I think it was during the summer.
- [61:01]
A
I think I went to Cal State and I think I put 10,000 in the bet. You know, if you what you wanted to bet. And I think the return was 180,000.
- [61:08]
D
No, I think it was September. October. Ish.
- [61:12]
A
Ugh.
- [61:15]
C
You can always do it. You can always do a parlor.
- [61:18]
B
You missed it by ish. It was 180,000ish.
- [61:24]
A
Go with your heart.
- [61:25]
D
Give or take.
- [61:26]
B
Give it.
- [61:26]
D
Take.
- [61:27]
A
So 13 past the hour live from studio 6B. We're back right after this at the.
- [61:36]
C
Sam.
- [62:17]
A
Seventeen past the hour live from Studio 6P. On a Wednesday night, Rick Delgado was doing headlines. He only got to one of his videos. President Trump's interview he gave to me where. Well, we'll wait and see what the reaction is to it as more of those clips hit the hit social media.
- [62:35]
C
I thought you had a read.
- [62:36]
A
Can't imagine. No, I don't. That's why I said I could have made my coffee. I can't imagine too many conservatives are gonna think that's a great idea. But I guess we'll wait and see. What else still gotta happen in this interview?
- [62:48]
C
Well, let's see. President Trump talked about various different things that he covered. I only grabbed a couple of them, some of the ones that jumped out at me. Here he is. Is cut number seven, talking about Iran and the protesters. When being asked by Tom Lamas about whether the protesters can count on the US Here is cut seven. President Trump in that interview that's going to be airing on Super Bowl Sunday. Check this out. Cut 7.
- [63:11]
B
Should the supreme leader in Iran be worried right now?
- [63:15]
E
I would say he should be very worried. Yeah, he should be. As you know, they're negotiating with us.
- [63:20]
B
I know they are, but the protesters have said, you know, where are the Americans? You promised them we would have their back.
- [63:25]
C
Do we still have their back?
- [63:26]
E
We've had their back. And look, that country's a mess right now because of us. We went in, we wiped out their nuclear.
- [63:33]
C
Yeah. So there he is talking about Iran. He went into more detail about, of course, you know, taking on the Iranians if they try and set up another nuclear facility. He mentioned that as well. Of course. He is also a friend, a longtime friend of Patriots owner Robert Kraft says he'll be watching the team play in the super bowl from afar. He says when talking about some of the things going on revolving the musical performers at the super bowl, the president noted he's not a fan of them. I'm anti them, he said, though he stressed that is not the reason for avoiding the game. I think it's a terrible choice. All it does is sow hatred and it's terrible. According to the president. Speaking of other things that he covered, here is cut number eight. President Trump talking about immigration and crime and how things have been going with this interview from NBC. Tom Lamas, check this out. Cut eight.
- [64:29]
B
That big change on immigration. 700 officers leaving Minneapolis.
- [64:33]
C
Did that come from you?
- [64:34]
E
Yes, it did, but it didn't come from me because I just wanted to do it. We have, we are waiting for them to release prisoners, give us the murderers that they're holding. And all of the bad people, drug dealers, all of the bad people we allowed in our country. I say 25 million people with an open border policy for four years under Biden and that group, the auto pen group, I call them, we allowed to come into our country, people the likes of which no country would accept. And we're getting them out, but we've gotten a lot of them out. So crime now in Minnesota, crime now in Minneapolis is down. Crime in all cities is down.
- [65:15]
C
Speaking.
- [65:16]
E
You know why it's down? It's down because of us. It's down in Chicago by 25% despite the fact that we are always dealing with these people. And they happen to be Democrats. Speaking of, they don't know anything about crime prevention.
- [65:29]
D
Yeah.
- [65:29]
C
So there he is talking about the immigration, the crime numbers, how crime is coming down around the country. And when you're talking about, when you're talking about immigration, he mentions, you know, some of the things that have changed in Minneapolis.
- [65:40]
A
I'm noticing a melding of local crime into immigration.
- [65:46]
C
You notice that immigrant, immigrants commit local crime.
- [65:49]
D
And the crime numbers all weighed down.
- [65:51]
B
Yeah, 90% of it.
- [65:53]
C
Right here is, here's cut number nine. Here is Tom Holman talking about what's going on in Minneapolis now that he's arrived on the scene. And again, when he talks, when he makes certain, certain comments here, I just have to think that somebody, he, he or President Trump showed those guys a picture of their house. Cut number nine. Check this out.
- [66:13]
D
We currently have an unprecedented number of counties communicating with us now and allowing ICE to take custody of illegal aliens before they hit the streets. Unprecedented cooperation. Now, say it again. This is efficient. Requires only one or two officers to assume custody of a criminal alien target, rather than eight or 10 officers going into the community and arresting that public safety threat. This frees up more officers to arrest or remove criminal aliens. More officers taking custody of criminal aliens directly from the jails means less officers on the street doing criminal operations. This is smart law enforcement, not less law enforcement.
- [67:01]
C
Yeah, so there he is backing up basically. You know what he's been talking about. He was a lot harsher. Later on in his interview with Laura Ingram on another network there, Damon, he really, really kind of laid, laid the, laid the hammer down when he was talking about some of the things that they've been doing over there and basically backed it up by saying this is not, you know, we're not doing less, we're working smarter, we're working just as hard. And like he said, he's getting unprecedented cooperation. Something I don't think two weeks ago you would have seen coming out of Minneapolis this up until now. So pretty interesting.
- [67:39]
A
Okay. I mean I don't, I don't buy it. It looks, it just looks like a big softening to me. I mean that's what it looks like. I think that's the way most conservatives will look at it. The nomenclature. As soon as the nomenclature starts changing, which happened like three weeks ago to the, all of a sudden it's now all word. It's the criminal. They have to have committed another crime. Since they committed the first crime of coming here.
- [68:07]
C
They've been saying that since everybody's going.
- [68:09]
A
To look at it differently. I guess it, it, it just clearly to me looks like a, just a big, big, big shift.
- [68:16]
C
I don't think so because Homan's been pretty steady. They've always said they're going to focus on the criminals. Right. He wants that to, to be the thing. If they pick them up and they're with other illegals.
- [68:27]
A
You mean the two time criminal. They're all criminals.
- [68:29]
C
They're all criminals, right.
- [68:31]
A
I mean that's the, that's the kind of the idea. It's true.
- [68:35]
C
Said they're going to start what didn't they say? And you can go back and look at the last year they've been talking about. We're going to go after the ones, the bad ones first and scoop them up.
- [68:45]
A
It's like I object. Well, I strenuously object. Oh, no, in that case, the criminals. No, no, the criminal criminals.
- [68:56]
D
Look, time's going to tell, right?
- [68:58]
C
Yeah, time's going to tell.
- [68:59]
D
So look, this reason why they put a poly market on everything.
- [69:03]
A
Yeah, all right, what else, Delgado?
- [69:06]
C
All right, well, Scott Besant, one of our favorites was up on the Hill. You want to take a stab at what they tried to do to him today?
- [69:12]
A
Sure. I bet it didn't. Without even knowing what this is going to be. I bet it didn't go too well for them.
- [69:18]
C
It didn't go too well. For them at all. He was dealing with Democratic members of the House Financial Services Committee as a lobbed criticism at the Treasury Secretary, Scott Bess. And among those, some of the smartest, the brightest Democrats you could just imagine had some great questions. They came from states like California and New York. As a matter of fact, here he is having a quite pleasant discussion. Cut number 10 with Maxine Waters, the Democrat from California. Cut number 10. Check this out.
- [69:59]
A
The time does belong to the housing woman from California. Ten and twenty million immigrants. Look at the housing, housing stock, working Americans. And can you maintain level of. His time has expired.
- [70:12]
D
No, my time has not expired.
- [70:13]
A
Your time has expired.
- [70:14]
C
The gentleman.
- [70:15]
A
The gentleman took up my time. Mr.
- [70:18]
D
I think you should recognize that, Mr.
- [70:20]
B
Chair.
- [70:20]
C
The gentleman's time has expired. The gentlewoman's time has expired.
- [70:24]
A
So there nothing gentle about that woman.
- [70:26]
C
Nothing general about Maxine Waters. Waters. And then after he was done with Maxine Waters, here he is schooling her on how economics actually works. Damon, cut number 11. Check this out.
- [70:37]
A
I believe the ranking member does not understand the definition of generalized inflation versus one time price increases. I would also note that housing, especially for working Americans. A Wharton study has shown that the mass unfettered immigration adding 10 to 20. The million new people demanding housing, Congresswoman, is what caused a great deal of housing inflation for working Americans. So you and the Biden administration should be ashamed.
- [71:06]
B
Yeah, Scott.
- [71:08]
C
And by the way, your time has expired.
- [71:11]
A
Scott Besson against anyone on the whole damn panel is an unfair fight.
- [71:15]
C
Yeah, I got a couple more clips we can get to after the break if you want to.
- [71:18]
B
I think a wig.
- [71:19]
D
Maxine can't bounce her checkbook. She's arguing about fiscal responsibility. Good stuff.
- [71:26]
A
Gotta love her, though.
- [71:28]
D
See you.
- [71:30]
A
Maybe not. All right, 26 best today. We'll do some more news. Bo Nolan, Rick Delgado, sports and slick off coming up. Come out.
- [71:51]
C
Sam.
- [72:18]
A
All right, 30 minutes past the hour. Live from Studio 6B, Real America's Voice all across the country. Glad you're in on a Wednesday night. Slicks doing sports. Delgado's doing news. Paul Nolan gonna do some more news as well. Aaron, Fran holding it down. Please welcome our friend back to the show. Precious metal specialist from our friends over at the Birch Gold group, Philip Patrick. Mr. Patrick, how are you?
- [72:39]
F
I'm doing well, guys, how are you?
- [72:41]
A
We're doing good. I don't know if you heard the show earlier, but about six months ago when it was down to about four people for the Federal Reserve job, I went on to Kalshee and made the prediction that Kevin Warsh would be the winner. And at the time, I think If I put 10,000 on Kevin Warsh, it returned 180,000. At the time, Paul thinks it's. And did I do it? Of course not, I did not. And here he is now looking with the job. So, you know, I'm a little bitter on that 180 grand at the time.
- [73:09]
D
10 grand. He'd stay up all night and stare at it.
- [73:12]
A
Yeah, I never would have done it.
- [73:13]
B
Obviously he'd take it out for dinner, buying flowers.
- [73:18]
A
So let's get to Kevin here and it's.
- [73:20]
C
He won't even take us to Vegas.
- [73:21]
A
Yeah, no.
- [73:22]
B
Oh, we went to the sphere.
- [73:23]
A
We'll get to, we'll get to Kevin here in a second. But let's talk about. I mean, obviously nothing goes up and to the right all the time. As much as, you know, when you're invested in the market, that's what you want to see. But it's really actually unhealthy when that happens. So obviously gold has had quite the run. Silver quite the run. Obviously they pulled back a little bit Friday. Gold price nearly about, about 10%, silver down about 30%. What, what happened that day other than. Is that just a healthy retrace? What do you, what do you think?
- [73:50]
F
Yeah, I, I think ultimately it was that I, I thought I was having a bad week until I heard your story. Look, we got to say this plainly, this was a violent sell off and I think anyone pretending otherwise just isn't being honest. But what violent sell offs don't mean is that the fundamentals have changed and they have not. What I positioning got extreme precious metals have gone parabolic in the last 12 months as we've been talking. That led to big leverage in gold and silver futures from hedge funds and investment banks. Then we see the short term speculators pile in and when the context changes, it's the leverage that gets flushed out first. And I think that's what we saw. What we haven't seen is a sell off from long term buyers and holders of gold and silver. They are very much staying firm. So I think the investment case has not changed at all. It's just prices that have changed. But as you point out, listen, we saw a 30% retracement in silver. It's still up over 11% for the year. We're just over a month in. Gold's up about 8%. So this for me was a welcome retracement. Nothing has changed in terms of fundamentals.
- [75:06]
A
Yeah. And I love people like you say People want to attribute moves like this to the news, but most real analysts will say, know, show me the chart and I'll tell you the news. I don't need to see the news to see the chart. It's the reverse. Usually the news doesn't affect the chart. The chart goes where the chart's going to go. Like you said, a healthy retrace, especially after that run. A lot of headlines did point to Kevin War saying, oh, it's about this new selection. Do you think that, I mean, what do you think about that?
- [75:31]
F
I, I'm with you. I'm skeptical that that sort of one nomination leads to a 30% crash in silver. You know, if war should suddenly change the outlook for monetary policy, we would have seen it first in government debt price rate futures didn't happen. Debt costs barely responded. Rate cut probabilities have basically stayed the same. And the dollar rose very modestly, not explosively. What it tells us is that this wasn't a wholesale repricing of monetary policy. Everything did not change. I think the war story worked as a good headline excuse, but not the explanation. I think it may have been the spark, but leverage was the fuel. Once the Fed decision looked Locke, I think speculators took profits. So it's that simple.
- [76:22]
A
Yeah. Well, while we're talking about them, let's stick on Kevin Warsh for a second. And again, I don't think any one individual ever really affects these markets. I mean, I think you can look back at a lot of markets and then people say, oh, look who just got elected or look who's coming into this, or look at this legislation that they're finally going to get behind. And in the end, you know, people think it's going to be positive and it ends up being negative or nothing. And people think it's going to be negative and it ends up being positive. You can't really attribute that. But speaking of Kevin Warsh, what do you personally think? Hawk Dove? Good for the dollar, bad for the dollar. What's your personal feeling?
- [76:55]
F
Look, I don't think he's a cartoon villain and I don't think he's the savior either. What he is, he's obviously a former Fed governor. He's experienced, he's a crisis era insider. He was in and around the 2008 great financial crisis. And we know in theory he's a balance sheet hawk. He's criticized qe, which is encouraging. He doesn't like the Fed's history of medd, and he's wary of how the Fed have driven Huge wealth disparity in the United States. So all of that sounds bullish for the dollar and it sounds somewhat bearish for gold. But the reality is this, first of all, the Fed governor is one vote out of 12. Even if Waller and Mirren vote for lower rates, they haven't got a majority. The bigger issue, and I think this was what you were implying in the lead up, even if Walsh wants discipline, that discipline has to come from Congress who are borrowing trillions of dollars, the treasurer issuing mountains of debt, and the markets still ultimately define the effective funds rate of all that debt. Even the best Fed chair in the world can't strengthen the dollar if Congress can't get spending under control. Obviously I want Kevin Walsh to succeed, but his success would require something we've never seen before and that is a, a disciplined monetary policy without matching discipline in spending and debt issuance. And this is something that has never coexisted in history. So I'm not saying it's impossible, but I think more and more unlikely.
- [78:27]
A
Yeah, well, I guess last Friday would pile onto that theory given that the Republicans who are, I guess in charge just piled down another 2 trillion onto the debt to push it to 40 trillion with Biden era level spending. So there's literally no difference in the spending at all from the end of Biden's term into this term so far. So I guess we kind of talked about it, but I guess. So your outlook on precious metals due to the sell off and kind of the whole story of that right now for everyday Americans. Any other big takeaways? You don't think it's changed kind of that scenario and the outlook for where we're going?
- [79:03]
F
No, I really don't. Look, we know what didn't change and that is global debt levels, structural revenue deficits here in the United States, population demographics and productivity. And it didn't stop central banks buying gold either. So. No. Right. Gold didn't go up in 70% last year because it was trendy. It rose because confidence in paper promises broadly has sort of eroded. That's not going anywhere. I think what we saw was a correction after a crowded run up, which is not unusual, it's not unhealthy. In fact, flushing out leverage often makes a bull market more durable. Like I said, we got to get some context. This huge drop in gold prices gave back just six days worth of gains. We're still up over 68% in the last 12 months. So I think fundamentals haven't changed and I think you summed it up better than anything at the beginning. Even the Republicans can't get a handle on spending. This problem has gotten out of control. Neither side of the aisle knows what to do. And as long as that's the case case, gold and silver are going to continue to go up longer term.
- [80:17]
A
And if you want to see if gold and silver is right for you, of course, reach out to our friends at Birchgold. Text America to 989-898. Text America to 989-898. Philip Patrick, always a pleasure to have you on. Thank you very much.
- [80:30]
F
Thank you, Damon. Cheers, guys.
- [80:32]
A
All right. Have a good rest of your night. Philip Patrick there from our friends at Birchgold. Text America to 989-898. If you want to see if gold and silver is right for you or at least part of a balanced portfolio. And man, he's right on the money with the leverage part of what we talked about there. Market makers, just when they see that kind of leverage and they see people piling in on leverage, leverage trades, that's, that's where you get those kind of drops. They just say, we're not doing that. And then they work it the other way. They bring it to where they want and then they leverage the other way and they go. And now they're going the other way. So. All right, great stuff with Philip Patrick again. Text America to 989-898. Paul Nolan, Lawmakers Grill Netflix, Warner Brothers exactly what's going on with that?
- [81:20]
D
That's a little curveball. Okay. I thought we're going to Luna, but yeah, I don't know if you saw this today. Josh Hawley went on the offensive and this, this Warner Brothers Netflix merger would give them kind of a large share almost in a monopoly range change. We always see the collusion of power through these media outlets controlling narratives. And I really like the way Josh Hawley handled himself today. I like Delgado's reaction to this.
- [81:49]
H
Why is it that so much of Netflix content for children promotes a transgender ideology? Almost half of your content for I'm talking about minor children now. I'm not talking about teenagers. Minor children, Children Promote a Transgender Ideology agenda. I was just looking at the data here from your very serious various series. And what concerns me is just two days ago, a jury in New York awarded a former transitioner $2 million.
- [82:22]
A
Because.
- [82:22]
H
She said that her psychologists and others pressured her into they pushed on her, an ideology that proved to be extremely detrimental. I'm sure you know that in the UK the National Health Service in the UK has said that they're not going to perform transgender surgeries or any longer so called gender affirming care for minors, including in counseling, because it is so incredibly detrimental. Our own HHS has come forward with similar findings this past year. Yet if you turn on Netflix, you'll find that an enormous amount. I say this as a parent with three young children. An enormous amount of your children's programming has this, this ideology and agenda in it. Is this an advocacy position for Netflix? Are you, is this a, is this an ideological commitment you have? I mean, why is this generality?
- [83:09]
B
Netflix has no political agenda of any kind.
- [83:11]
A
I would tell you that.
- [83:12]
H
Well, then why is your children's program so full of this highly sexualized, highly controversial, highly controversial agenda? I don't, I don't, I don't understand it. It seems strange to me.
- [83:25]
B
Respectfully, sir, it's because it's inaccurate.
- [83:27]
A
We have millions of hours of children's programming.
- [83:29]
H
I get you're saying it's not there. You don't, you don't have trans, you don't feature trans characters, trans story lines, trans themes.
- [83:36]
A
It's saying we.
- [83:36]
H
It's not in your programming.
- [83:37]
A
I'm saying we feature a wide variety of stories and programs to meet a wide variety of people's tastes.
- [83:42]
H
Why is almost half of it. Why does almost half of your children's program feature this highly controversial, highly sexualized material?
- [83:50]
A
What?
- [83:50]
H
That just seems strange to me. It can't possibly be a reflection of the population.
- [83:56]
B
I don't have any idea where that.
- [83:57]
A
Number would come from or what that would be. I don't believe that's been your personal experience. But I don't.
- [84:03]
B
I can't speak to that.
- [84:03]
H
Well, what do you mean? You don't think it's been my personal experience? You don't think that I monitor what my children watch on your. Here's what I tell you what my personal experience is. Since you bring it up. My personal experience is that my three children, I can't let them watch anything they want on Netflix. I can't let them watch anything on Netflix unless I preview it.
- [84:18]
A
Wow.
- [84:18]
D
A koala bear in a suit, stunned by.
- [84:21]
A
It always amazes me. These guys go into these hearings against guys like Holly and Cruz, and they know they're going to go up against guys who are attorneys and know how to question a witness, and they go in so ill prepared, and then all they do is they do this lame.
- [84:32]
B
Like, he's like, me. Hey, I bet.
- [84:37]
C
I, I think because I think truly he didn't know because he's just like, I'm just Running Netflix.
- [84:43]
D
No, come on.
- [84:44]
A
Come on. What do you mean?
- [84:46]
C
I mean, when I talk about that, I don't think he realized how much.
- [84:50]
D
He's in every board meeting. He knows where the money's coming from and who it's going to. He's. No way.
- [84:56]
C
No, but I'm talking about the, the, the programming itself. When it gets down to that, that stuff that they're coming up with, it's just like, oh, yeah, that's gonna be this guy's handle that.
- [85:05]
F
Great, great.
- [85:06]
C
This is what these guys do. And then all of a sudden when you hit them with details like that, they're like, no way.
- [85:11]
D
No way. He's in on it.
- [85:12]
A
All right.
- [85:12]
D
He's in on it. Cruz had a good day there, too, though.
- [85:16]
C
Wow.
- [85:17]
D
Bruce kicks in butt far.
- [85:18]
A
Live from Studio 6P. We're back right after this. Yeah.
- [85:42]
C
Sam.
- [86:23]
A
All right. 13 to the hour. Live from Studio 6B, let's try to get to everybody one more time. We'll start with Slick. Let's do some sports. Sports brought to you by Mike Lindell. Sickster. What's going on?
- [86:31]
B
I can't believe we didn't talk about the Pro bowl last night. It was on. We missed it. The Pro bowl football, first time ever. They did it during the week of the guys. Come on. Flag football. Yes, sir. Jalen Hurts leads NFC past AFC in high scoring Pro bowl game. This is Fox News. Jalen Hurts said the flag football played in the pro football games doesn't have the negative connotation that it may have once had as you guys were starting to refer to. If anything. Hurts believes the NFL's All Star exhibition is as competitive as ever. It's like being a kid again, but it also turns competitive with everything that that the Eagles quarterback said after throwing three touchdown passes. And the NFC is ready for the score 66:52 win over the AFC on Tuesday night. Even with the 2028 Olympics, there's a lot of guys that have a great passion to go out there and represent because in 2028 we're going to have flag football in the Olympics, which is going to be pretty cool. I think there was plenty of representation from both sides in the high scoring event, which was played indoors this year at the Moscone Center, a convention center near downtown San Francisco before a crowd of 3,100. It was the first time the Pro bowl was held during super bowl week and the host city was well represented with the 49ers greats Jerry Rice and Steve Young, who have a combined 20 Pro bowl selections serving as the head coaches. The super bowl is Sunday, obviously at Santa Clara in Levi's Stadium. Dak Prescott oh, the great Dak Prescott of the Cowboys wore a bucket hat and passed for four touchdowns. No comments. While the Lions Jared Goff threw two touchdown passes for the afc, the Bengals Joe Burrow threw for a touchdown and was credited with a passing and receiving score on the same play when he and Dolphins running back Devon Chanel Kane pulled off a trick play in the first half. So it was a good game. NFC coming out with a big win. I would have bet the NFC and the odds makers, but we didn't even, we didn't even talk about the game last night, which was really weird. And well, one more quick story for the Islanders here. Paul Bird becomes hockey guy at UBS Arena Sparks Islanders overtime win this is Matt Riegel of Outkick Sports. Love this story. It's not unusual to see wildlife interrupt the sporting event, but it's when that sport is played inside most of the time. However, that's what we got on Tuesday night when a bird decided to check the out New York Islanders game at UBS Arena. Your bird barely sings. The Islanders took on the Pittsburgh Penguins on Tuesday night in an important Metropolitan Division class as these two teams are neck and neck in the standings with just over a minute left in the first period. With the game nodded at one, a small bird proved it's a certified hockey guy by hanging around to catch the final minute of action while others were off to grab another beer and take a leak or both. And here we go. Aaron run cut 16. Show my little sparrow over there.
- [88:54]
C
Here's a.
- [88:58]
D
You see who skid into the bird when he swerved?
- [89:00]
B
Yes, I know this is the only clip we got, but we had a bird. I'll tell you, a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.
- [89:08]
D
That sounds like he comes behind the net, shoots in his knee, hits the bird, makes the pass in front, they score. And then the bird takes off to the to the corner camera. It was really funny.
- [89:19]
B
He's got a bird's eye view. And the Islanders turned out they won that game in overtime. Big game for the Islanders. Maybe we got that lucky bird. Help us out, Paul. I know a lot of the rest were getting the birds for bad calls, but that was a different kind of bird. That's a Rapid Sports Big D. Back to you.
- [89:31]
A
All right, ten minutes to the hour. Live from Studio 6B, Pauline Nolan. What's what else is on your newsrade or anything?
- [89:36]
D
You know, if I could Just plug my ex. Guys, give me a follow. I don't have a radio show, I don't have a TV show but I got a X page and I'm trying to build that up and I what I'll do is I'll watch those three hour documentaries or and I'll, I'll condense them into a three, four, five minute read so you don't have to spend all that time time. So I'm Paul Underscore Eggs Nolan. Please give me a follow. I follow back when we interact. And yeah, I got one more clip and it's Rick Delgado's favorite girl, Polina Luna. Talk about the SAVE act that I'm.
- [90:08]
I
Not so happy to report is that the votes do not exist in the Senate among Republican Senators to remove the filibuster. But that is why the standing filibuster is so important. And I know you do not have the votes currently to remove the filibuster on your own, but that is why the standing filibuster is so important and you know that. And so what I will say is that even though Schumer is trying to make it look like everyone that wants voter ID is racist, I'm sure you've seen the polling leader Thune and you see that the national voter ID is actually a wildly bipartisan issue. It doesn't matter if you're black, white, Hispanic, Asian, people want it. And so this is one of the top issues in our country right now. Please restore the people's faith in our election process. It's incredibly important. But I also know that I talked to Speaker Johnson and we will be passing what we can out of the House on the Save America Act. However, there are vehicles that we can attach this to. We understand that the position that you are in and that there are many moderate Republican members who might not necessarily believe in this to include the all the Democrats in the Senate that literally just said they want mass amnesty and no voter id. But it has to happen. And so I look forward to these continued discussions that you will be having. I know that the President is behind this. I know that the speaker of the House is behind this and I know many members of the Republican conference here in the House are behind this. So I hope that you take this as me not trying to publicly bully you, but simply being transparent with the American people. And I look forward to securing these wins for the American people.
- [91:33]
D
Yeah, 82% of the public agree on on voter ID. And meanwhile Chucky Schmucky Schumer is calling it Jim Crow.
- [91:41]
C
Yeah. Jim Crow 2.0 and what do you call it? What was I. Okay. Something on?
- [91:49]
A
You having a biden moment?
- [91:51]
C
I'm having a biden moment, I guess. According to this from the babylon B Suspicious voter ID bill defeated in Senate by a vote of 7 million to 53. So it's never going to pass, I don't think with those kind of numbers.
- [92:03]
D
That's good.
- [92:05]
A
Hey, before we get to Delgado to wrap it up, let's just put this up the President untruth. About 50 minutes ago, I spoke with Savannah Guthrie and I let her know that I am directing all federal law enforcement to be at the families and local law enforcement's complete disposal immediately. We are deploying all resources to get her mother home safely. The prayers of a nation are with her and her family. God bless and protect Nancy, President Donald Trump. And let's hope that the. If they can be of any help with resources to find this poor woman, hopefully they can.
- [92:38]
C
Yeah. And Pima county is a small. You know, they don't have the resources. So I. I know they're taking advantage of what the state is offering them there in Arizona. But also, you know, of course, anything from the fed welcomed.
- [92:52]
A
I just hope they put that video out for a reason.
- [92:55]
E
Yeah.
- [92:56]
A
Because it had some very specific language in it that I wouldn't think they would have just done to do. I would have thought that they were. There's a very good reason they're doing that.
- [93:03]
B
Yep.
- [93:04]
A
So. All right, dog, I'll wrap us up. What else is in the news? All right.
- [93:08]
C
Well, this one.
- [93:09]
A
Trump endorsed Teshera, by the way.
- [93:11]
C
Oh, yeah.
- [93:12]
B
Nice. Good. He's a great guy.
- [93:14]
C
Very good. This one is going to hit. Talking about hitting a home run. This could hit home. A home run for people or not. Definitely. Paul, I. I think you'll be interested in this one as a TSA could hit some travelers with a new 45 fee. You heard it. That's right. You know, you're supposed to get your real ID. That thing was signed into law, what, like 20 years ago to make sure that everybody was compliant or you have to use your. Your passport.
- [93:41]
A
Yeah.
- [93:41]
C
To fly. Well, now they've come out with a new way to get around it. And it's only going to cost you 45 bucks. Travelers who arrive at u. S. Airports without their. Their real id, Damon, they're going to be able to fly anywhere as long as they do a few things like open up their wallets and pay $45. The change notice confirm ID now took effect on February 1st. It's going to help verify passengers identities while allowing those without proper documentation to continue traveling. Wow, this sounds like. Show us your papers. The new field fee will offset the cost of extra screening required for passengers who not who do not present a real id, passport or other acceptable other acceptable identification. Here is. Who do we have talking about this? I had it someplace. Cut 14. Here's CNN's Pete Montin doing a quick grab on this. TSA's new money grab. Cut 14. Check this out.
- [94:45]
A
Okay. 20 years since Real ID was signed into law started being enforced seven months ago, May 7th. Now, now, not only would those without Real ID have to pay, but they could be surprised by this new rule.
- [94:55]
B
At maybe the worst possible time in.
- [94:57]
A
Line at a TSA checkpoint. Worse yet, the agency says this whole.
- [95:02]
C
Process could take you an extra half hour.
- [95:05]
A
Talk about a bad travel day.
- [95:06]
B
Wow. The Trump administration just made this new announcement.
- [95:08]
A
Those who have not yet been to their state DMV to update their license will have to log on to a new TSA web portal, verify they are who they are, who they say they.
- [95:18]
B
Are, and then pay a 45 valid for 10 days.
- [95:23]
A
So theoretically it can be used for your return trip as well. But the TSA says if you try.
- [95:27]
C
To fly after that 10 day window.
- [95:29]
A
You'Ll have to pay the 45 fee again.
- [95:33]
C
Awesome.
- [95:34]
B
I just got the license.
- [95:35]
A
As always, we salute our military, active and active. Police, firefighters, first responders, all of our emergency personnel, all law enforcement. Again, hopefully they can help find this poor woman. Thanks guys. On the show, Aaron, Frank, great job as always. Most of all, thank you. Live from Studio 6P audience, enjoy the rest of your night. Everybody. We're back tomorrow night, same place, same channel. 8:00pm Live from Studio 6B. We'll see you then. This is an I heart podcast. Guaranteed human.