STINCHFIELD TONIGHT FEBRUARY 13TH, 2026

Summary

---

Real America’s Voice – Stinchfield Tonight (February 13th, 2026)

Podcast: Real America’s Voice
Host: Grant Stinchfield
Guest Analysts/Correspondents: Brian Glenn, Kevin Posobiec, Mark Morano, Dr. James Thorpe, Jennifer Horn, Greg Hartley
Air Date: February 14, 2026

---

Overview

This episode of Stinchfield Tonight delivers a high-energy, opinion-driven exploration of the current budget showdown in Congress, the ongoing Nancy Guthrie missing person case, and a host of hot-button topics including climate policy rollbacks, Los Angeles’ mayoral race, and a candid discussion tying cancer rates to the COVID vaccine. Special guests provide insider takes, breaking developments, and behavioral analysis—hallmarks of the Real America’s Voice approach.

---

Congressional Budget Showdown & ICE Funding Debate

Discussed: 02:25–09:45 (Key quote 03:29, 04:49, 06:37, 08:15)

• Host Grant Stinchfield launches into the looming threat of a government shutdown due to disputes over DHS funding.

  • Frames Democrats as obstructionists, accusing them of grandstanding by threatening to defund ICE (Immigrations, Customs Enforcement)—while pointing out ICE remains funded even in a shutdown.
  • Points to overlooked impacts: TSA, Coast Guard, and FEMA will be affected, not ICE.
  • Quote (03:29):
    • President Trump: “We always have to protect our law enforcement. Very important. They've done a great job. Remember, they've taken out hundreds of thousands of criminals out of our country.”

• Senator Chuck Schumer's clip is played, vowing no Democratic votes to fund ICE without "strong, meaningful reforms."

• Grant's Rebuke:

  • “Rein in the man. Defund them. What are you talking about? ICE again will be funded even if you do and did walk out of Washington, turn your backs on the American people.” (04:23)
  • Notes even CNN and mainstream media concede the Democrats' stance is largely political grandstanding. (04:49)

• Brian Glenn (Chief White House Correspondent) is brought on (05:27):

  • Blames both parties, noting both have left town and won’t return until February 23rd, drawing attention to the 60,000 TSA workers, 20,000 FEMA employees, and Coast Guard left in limbo.
  • Suggests Democrats believe their anti-ICE stance will energize voters in the midterms, although both he and Stinchfield express skepticism about its viability.
  • Quote (06:37):
    • “This cannot play well in the elections because, look, you've got two weeks and you let these TSA workers go, go another government shutdown for another two weeks. … This is Schumer shutdown 3.0 on this, without a doubt.”
  • Both lambaste lawmakers for leaving for a climate conference in Munich during the crisis.

---

The Nancy Guthrie Case – FBI/Local Feud & Developments

Discussed: 09:50–17:15; Updated 12:41–15:26

• Host revisits his early reporting on inter-agency tensions in the Nancy Guthrie investigation. FBI wanted forensic evidence processed at Quantico; the local sheriff insisted on a Florida lab, escalating into a public feud.

  • The host observes the case has “come to … almost a halt” with no suspects or leads.

• On Cartel/Nation-State Theories:

  • President Trump: “It's somebody either do what they were doing very well or they were rank amateurs. Either way, it's not a good situation.” (11:34)

• FBI Involvement:

  • Caroline Levitt (12:03): “The FBI … has been on the ground … and we are offering the full resources and weight of the federal government to help local authorities bringing this case to an end, to bring Nancy Guthrie home.”

• Field Correspondent Kevin Posobiec (live from Tucson, AZ, 12:41):

  • Reports bomb squad and SWAT activity, hinting at a possible suspect being brought in.
  • Reveals local law enforcement's internal strife and sheriff's checkered history, with the case still very much in flux (13:59).
  • Describes normalcy at the Guthrie residence, illustrating “business as usual” despite the ongoing investigation.

• Surveillance Video Details:

  • Explains the recovery of footage due to a technical quirk—the perpetrator removed the camera, preserving the cache that has aided the investigation (15:26).

---

Trump’s Climate Agenda Rollback

Discussed: 17:15–25:14 (Key quotes: 18:42, 21:47, 24:44)

• Climate Policy Rollbacks Spark Media Backlash:

  • Trump administration eliminates federal authority to regulate climate under the EPA, including reversing Obama-era auto stop-start mandates and withdrawing from the 1992 Rio Earth Summit Treaty.

• Mark Morano (Climate Depot publisher, 18:42):

  • Declares this a “monumental” bureaucratic rollback, promising lower car costs and an end to “the almost universally despised start stop feature”—seen as a useless “accounting trick.”
  • Quote (18:42):
    • “These were all regulations imposed during the Obama administration on the issue of auto stop start…literally just an accounting trick…does nothing.”

• On Regulatory Overreach:

  • Asserts climate change became a pretext for “unelected mid-level bureaucrats at the EPA [to] regulate every aspect of the US Economy … without a consent or vote of Congress.”
  • Emphasizes the legal importance of reversing the EPA’s “CO2 endangerment finding” to hamstring future Democratic administrations.
  • Quote (21:47):
    • “This was the legal justification for all of the net zero green New Deal climate agenda imposed on America. … So what they did is use this, which was authorized by the Supreme Court…able to justify anything and everything.”

• Gavin Newsom at Munich Conference:

  • Newsom contends Trump’s climate rollbacks are “temporary,” promising California remains a “stable and reliable partner" on climate issues. Morano counters the changes aim for “permanence” (24:44).

---

Los Angeles Mayoral Race: The Progressive “Spoiler”

Discussed: 27:42–35:33

• Host attacks Democratic candidate Nithya Raman, presenting her progressive proposals (seizing private housing, jail closures without alternatives, renewable energy by 2035, unarmed policing, decriminalizing drugs, noncitizen voting).

• Critics (e.g., Spencer Pratt) blast Raman as a “lunatic activist” and flip-flopper, referencing her prior calls to “defund the police”.

• Jennifer Horn (Morning Answer host, 29:48):

  • Illustrates the mechanics: DSA-endorsed Raman is entering to syphon votes and take down more moderate challengers, possibly ensuring a two-Democrat runoff.
  • Warns of her history as “urban planner/activist” and calls her “dangerous because she knows how to lie and people don't know enough about her.”
  • Quote (31:56):
    • “So Nithya Rahman is seen as a spoiler in this race, but she also has a really bad reputation, Grant. … Very, very liberal … looking to say whatever she thinks it'll take to get elected.”

• Homelessness Spending in LA:

  • Reports only 10% of a $418 million homelessness budget actually went to housing; highlights astronomical costs of programs like Inside Safe ($86,000+ per homeless person/year).

---

Body Language Analysis: Nancy Guthrie Suspect & More

Discussed: 38:00–45:54

• Grant brings on Greg Hartley (Body Language Analyst, 38:00):
  • Hartley breaks down security footage of the suspect—emphasizes evidence of prior reconnaissance and possible teamwork (multiple suspects, possible spotter).
  • Quote (39:15):
    • “The person here is showing … The only thing that makes me wonder if this person knows her is they seem to be okay with their face being exposed after they start doing this. Could indicate they're not very smart. Could indicate they're under some kind of substance. There's all kinds of things that could indicate.”
  • Discusses signs of stress and unconscious behaviors in a possibly innocent man previously detained (blink rate, dropped gestures during awkward questions).
  • Assesses Jennifer Newsom (CA First Lady) at a Planned Parenthood event, reading her body language as stressed and uncomfortable.

---

COVID Vaccine, Cancer Spike & “Shield”

Discussed: 47:53–52:52

• Host links rising colorectal cancer rates in young people to COVID vaccines, introduces Dr. James Thorpe (Wellness Company).
• Dr. Thorpe (48:45):
  • Claims mass “explosive” increases in certain cancers are “now irrefutable,” citing large studies in Italy and Korea.
  • Recommends testing spike protein antibody levels and promotes supplements (notably “SHIELD” and “Ultimate Spike Detox”) marketed by The Wellness Company as preventative actions.
  • Quote (48:45):
    • “COVID 19 vaccines caused a massive increase in cancer, explosive cancers…This is now irrefutable. … Both of these studies show…anywhere from 4 to 8 fold increase in these cancers.”
  • Pushes product lines as necessary defenses alongside “not smoking, weight loss, exercise, diet.”
• Host concludes with a direct call to action: “If you took the vaccine, get on the Spike Detox, get on SHIELD and take control of your life back.” (51:44)

---

Quick Hits & Memorable Moments

• 45:54–47:53:

  • Grant teases a Don Lemon court appearance; highlights protesters with purple sex toys as odd, tongue-in-cheek symbolism.
  • Quote (54:29):
    • “A purple monster is what we call that. Why sex toys? What does that have to do anything? Oh, I know why. Maybe because all of them are real. Richard Noggins.”

• Throughout Episode:

  • Host repeatedly deploys sarcastic, bombastic language: “Democrats are nothing but obstructionists,” “the lunatic activist who wants to turn L.A. into the Purge,” “craziness.”
  • Multiple calls to “America First” values and frustration with “mainstream narratives.”

---

Notable Quotes By Segment

• DHS Funding / ICE Shutdown:
  • “ICE again will be funded even if you do and did walk out of Washington, turn your backs on the American people.” – Host, (04:23)
  • “This is Schumer shutdown 3.0 on this, without a doubt.” – Brian Glenn, (08:15)
• Climate Rollback:
  • “Trump administration is going after it…heads are exploding on the climate actors.” – Mark Morano, (18:42)
  • “This is the key. Permanence. That's the word. And what Trump's second term is doing is trying to make these changes permanent.” – Mark Morano, (24:44)
• LA Race:
  • “She is to the far left of Karen Bass…she wants to…reclaim the golf courses to put up public housing for people.” – Jennifer Horn, (30:05)
• Nancy Guthrie Case:
  • “Either they're really experienced or they're amateurs. The truth is, we just don't know.” – Host, paraphrasing Trump, (11:34)
• Vaccine/Cancer:
  • “COVID 19 vaccines caused a massive increase in cancer, explosive cancers, cancers all over the body…this is now irrefutable.” – Dr. James Thorpe, (48:45)

---

Timestamps for Major Segments

00:00–02:25 – Ads, Intro
02:25–09:45 – DHS Shutdown, ICE Funding, Political Grandstanding
09:50–17:15 – Nancy Guthrie Case: Law Enforcement Feud, Updates
17:15–25:14 – Trump’s Climate Rollback, EPA Deregulation (Mark Morano)
27:42–35:33 – LA Mayoral Race, Nithya Raman, Homelessness Programs (Jennifer Horn)
38:00–45:54 – Body Language: Nancy Guthrie Suspect Video, Media Figures (Greg Hartley)
47:53–52:52 – Colorectal Cancer Rise, COVID Vaccine Link, “Shield” Product (Dr. Thorpe)
54:29–56:13 – Trump at Fort Bragg; Don Lemon Protest Scene

---

Final Takeaways

• The episode is deeply partisan, devoted to exposing what it frames as Democratic hypocrisy, media complicity, and bureaucratic overreach.
• Coverage of the Nancy Guthrie case continues to blend active reporting, critical scrutiny of authorities, and real-time updates.
• Host and guests champion Trump-era climate policy rollbacks as “permanent” victories.
• Los Angeles politics and homelessness policy are depicted as symptoms of left-wing excess and dysfunction.
• The show heavily promotes COVID vaccine skepticism, directly attributing increased cancer rates to vaccination and marketing controversial supplements.

---

For listeners seeking urgent takes, bite-sized controversy, and unapologetically conservative analysis, this episode delivers in spades—pivoting briskly between breaking news, political commentary, and public health alarms.

Transcript

[A]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[B]

Guaranteed Human support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures well.

[C]

The holidays have come and gone once.

[A]

Again, but if you've forgotten to get that special someone in your life a.

[C]

Gift, well, Mint Mobile is extending their.

[A]

Holiday offer of half off unlimited wireless. So here's the idea. You get it now, you call it an early present for next year. What do you have to lose? Give it a [e-mail] Switch limited time.

[D]

50% off regular price for new customers. Upfront payment required $45 for 3 months, $90 for 6 month or $180 for 12 month plan taxes and fees. Extra speeds may slow after 50 gigabytes per month when network is busy. See terms People at work supported me.

[C]

While I was going through treatment by not treating me like somebody who was going through treatment.

[D]

Treatment sucks.

[A]

Cancer sucks.

[D]

Being engaged with work really helped to.

[C]

Oh, I just knew I was going.

[A]

To beat this thing.

[E]

Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place.

[D]

For healing, learn more and sign the [e-mail].

[A]

Well good evening everyone. Welcome to Stitchfield. I'll tell you what, the Democrat are nothing but obstructionists. We are now rapidly heading to this midnight deadline where DHS funding will kind of run out. You got the big beautiful bill and a lot of funding is being run through there but this is a problem. But Democrats are hypocrites through all of this. And the reason they're digging their heels in is this claim that they don't want to fund ICE anymore. Immigrations, Customs Enforcement. The only problem is ICE will still be funded even with the government shutdown. Now they don't want to tell you that you know what won't be funded completely? Organizations like Transportation Security Administration, tsa, the Coast Guard, fema. So Democrats are really sacrificing national security with this quest to defund ice, which isn't going to happen. Here's President Trump.

[D]

Are you anticipating cutting a deal with Democrats to end the potential shutdown for dhc?

[A]

We'll see what happens. We have. We always have to protect our law enforcement. Very important. They've done a great job. Remember, they've taken out hundreds of thousands of criminals out of our country. Well, if you're going to cut a deal, Mr. President, I don't know how you're going to do it. Democrats have left town. The deadline is tonight. Republicans fully willing to make a deal here. Democrats not so much. And they refuse to acknowledge that. I believe it's $75 billion goes to DHS through that big beautiful bill. So ICE operations will be funded. Listen to them lie. This is Chuck Schumer. So as you all know from day one, I've said unless there are really strong meaningful reforms to rein in ICE and stop the violence, there will not be Democratic votes to fund ICE and extend the awful status quo that now exists. Rein in the man. Defund them. What are you talking about? ICE again will be funded even if you do and did walk out of Washington, turn your backs on the American people. And the funniest part of all of this is that CNN is forced to admit that through all of this that the Democrats are doing nothing more than grandstanding.

[D]

Listen, do think Senator Britt's point that the, the parts of the Department of Homeland Security that would be the most impacted by this partial shutdown are not necessarily the parts that Democrats are mad at. And that creates kind of a little bit of political heartache I think on Democrats side.

[A]

So the media now forced to admit the Democrats are grandstanding. And what do Democrats do? They cut and run. I want to bring in now to discuss this chief White House correspondent. He's live for us in Washington tonight. Brian Glenn is here. Brian, welcome to the program.

[F]

Thanks, Grant.

[A]

Brian, it's not a good look for Democrats when they just leave town and the deadline is tonight. It's like not even trying to make an attempt to come up with a deal.

[F]

Yeah, they don't care. And I'll blame Republicans as well. Both have left town. And get this, the Senate and the House is not scheduled to come back in session until February 23rd. That is two weeks from now. And you said this in your open, Grant and I'll go over some of the numbers for you. You're talking about 60,000 TSA workers, which just came off another long shutdown, which a lot of them had to go several paychecks without getting a paycheck. I should say FEMA. 20,000 employees affected by FEMA and as you laid out correctly, the Coast Guard. That's putting national security at risk. But Grant, the Democrats think that this anti ICE stance helps them in the midterm. They have polling that they think this helps the American people go to the polls this November and elect a Democrat because they stood up against ice.

[A]

I can't imagine it does. To me, it really does look like they're just obstructionist. What do you think on this, Brian? Is there any way that, I mean, I'm sure it mobilizes their radical, which is a very small faction of the Democrat Party, but that, that radical base that's showing up, that's getting paid to show up, I'm sure it mobilizes them. Beyond that, I don't know.

[F]

Yeah, you're right. Oh, that's the, the 2 percenters that show up in their paid protesters. They make a lot of noise. They'll have bot farms that will attack social media and paint all of us as these Nazis. And these races that want to go through American cities and lock everybody up, which, mind you, over 4,000 arrests, grant in Minneapolis, these are hardened criminals. These are people that you want off the street. Now, as Tom Holman came in and said, look, we're going to draw back the troops a little bit. He's not drawing all of them back. You've got about 700 that are leaving town, but that does leave about 2,000 agents in that area that will be working with local authorities on getting some of these people out of the jails and really into the custody of ice. But, but this cannot play well in the elections because, look, you got two weeks and you let these TSA workers go, go another government shutdown for another two weeks. I can only suspect Grant. And you travel, there's going to be a lot of call ins. They're not going to go into work. They may quit. They may go look for another job. They can't go through this again. But this is Schumer shutdown. 3.0 on this, without a doubt.

[A]

3.0, you said. What date is it, Brian? Again, that they're. They're all coming back.

[F]

23Rd. February 23rd is the date you need to mark in the calendar. They're out. They don't come back in session for even a possible vote until then. So that's two weeks.

[A]

All right, Brian, you and I love to talk about strategy. You know what Republicans should be doing here. I know it's great to go home and see your families and all that jazz. Republicans should be meeting on the floor of the Senate every day between now and then saying, we're here, we're here, we're here, we're here. Let's do it, let's do it, let's do it. Instead of going and looking like they're on vacation too. While travelers are getting the short end, the coast guards getting the short end. Be there every day. Have those cameras in there every day. Your thoughts, Brian?

[F]

Yeah, no, you're right. There's. I read an article just before I came on how a lot of members, both in the House and the Senate, were going to a conference in Munich. Munich?

[A]

Yeah.

[F]

That's not America First. Look, I am so over our elected officials going on these codell trips on taxpayer dollars to go research whatever cause in some third world country. That stuff needs to end. You've got a great strategy. Get on the floor, open the cameras, let the American people see exactly what you're trying to do to open up this country and what the Democrats aren't doing right now.

[A]

We're going to talk about that Munich trip in a little bit because it's a climate summit. Go figure. And so they're going there as President Trump's overturning all that stuff. Brian Glenn, it's great to have you on the program. Enjoy the weekend, Mike friend, you too.

[F]

Happy Valentine's Day, Grant.

[A]

Hey, Happy Valentine's Day. All the Valentine's out there.

[G]

Woohoo.

[A]

All right, I'm sorry. Oh, brother. All right, now to the case of Nancy Guthrie. If you remember, we were the first to report that there was a growing feud in between the FBI and the sheriff's department. Long before Fox News reported in the Post. We were talking about it here. Well, this has reached a boiling point. Everybody's talking about the argument over the gloves. So apparently they found two gloves. They wanted to send him for DNA testing. FBI said send them to Quantico, their lab. The sheriff said no. Florida. Now we're told it's a big misunderstanding. This is the sheriff. Actually, the FBI just wanted to send.

[F]

The one or two they found by the crime scene closest to it.

[A]

Mile, mile and a half. They really wanted to send those.

[F]

And I said, you know, why do that?

[A]

Let's just send them all to where all the DNA exist, all the profiles and markers exist. Let's just send it there. They agreed. You know, makes sense. All right. What he's saying is the gloves are at this private lab in Florida where they sent other DNA evidence. And that's a confirmation, by the way, that they had other DNA evidence for testing that they did send to that lab. I do believe it goes far beyond just where the gloves going. There is dissension growing. There's frustration growing because this case has literally come to what appears to be almost a halt. And they have no suspects, have no leads. It's anyone's guess who did this. As Trump spells out so eloquently, do.

[D]

You think the cartels are at all involved in Nancy Guthrie's case or another nation state, potentially?

[A]

You can't say that yet a little bit, but it's somebody either do what they were doing very well or they were rank amateurs. Either way, it's not a good situation. Mr. President put it perfectly. They're really experienced or they're amateurs. The truth is, we just don't know. We do know the reward has been up to about a hundred thousand dollars now to find Nancy Guthrie, the mother of Savannah Guthrie, that today's show host. This is Caroline Levitt.

[D]

The FBI, in order to take over the investigation, would of course need the local authorities to hand it over to them. And I spoke with director Patel late last night and he assured me the FBI has been on the ground. In fact, Director Patel himself was on the ground in Arizona this week and that we are offering the full resources and weight of the federal government to help local authorities bringing this case to an end, to bring Nancy Guthrie home.

[A]

And I think that's what everybody wants. Now I want to bring in live from Tucson, Arizona, rad field correspondent Kevin Posobec is back tonight. Kevin, welcome back to the show.

[G]

Thanks for having me, Grant. And yeah, it's good to be here. I am at Mr. Chris Panos Police department right now. And you can see behind me is the Pima county sheriff's command center. And I gotta break it to you right now, actually, we're getting reports in that there may be a suspect on. On route in not Manassas, Arizona. I it's something with an m. But anyway, the point is, right behind me, there was a bomb squad truck just parked. You could see it says special ops right there on the pillar, and he's just left. But what we're. What we're seeing, that's about 20 minutes ago now. So they might be on route. That's a SWAT team. But it was a slightly smaller truck than this. Same logos and. But, yeah, I mean, that's a very, very developing story right now. And, I mean, most of the day, we're talking about the gloves and going to Florida, you know, instead of Quantico. So, I mean, this guy, he's. He's trying to take all the credit, you know, and not have the FBI involved. And so now we're two weeks later finding, you know, another suspect. Hopefully, this is the guy. We don't really know for sure yet. You know, the first guy got detained, let go. And so, yeah, we are. We are here on the scene.

[A]

Well, Kevin, I know you were out in front of Nancy Guthrie's house, and you said that it's almost as back to business as usual. Pool guys, Amazon packages coming to the house today.

[G]

Yes, yes. When I first showed up today, there were two pool guys there cleaning out the backyard. Cleaning the pool. Maybe they're looking for underwater fingerprints. Maybe Sheriff Panos had to see if they would look for that. I mean, this guy is like. Yeah. And I was doing some digging to Grant, and I'm finding that he's got a long history. Decades long. You know, he. This guy, he's got a big ego, local sources are telling me, and kind of a toxic guy to work for, so. But also, he's got some. Some lawsuits in the past about handling funds, so.

[A]

And I take it, Kevin, you're talking about. You're talking about the sheriff here.

[G]

Yes, sir. Sheriff Panners. Their nanos. Yeah. Sheriff. Yes, sir.

[A]

Anything you can tell us about this potential suspect?

[G]

As of right now, this is. This is breaking within the last 10, 15 minutes. And I just happen to be here to talk with the public information officer to, you know, get real America's voice on the. On the. On the bucket here to get some more interviews. So maybe I will stay here. Maybe I'll drive out. I will keep you posted and look forward to videos. I might drive out there myself.

[A]

Well, Kevin Posobuk, always great work. Thank you for that update, A very important one at that. All right, I want to turn now to the surveillance video because it's interesting. I've been doing some research as to how they would get the video. Nancy Guthrie didn't have a subscription. Do we have the surveillance video of the suspect? There we go. She didn't have a subscription. She wasn't supposed to have cloud based video. He removed the camera, yet they still managed to get the video. How does that happen? Well, here's how it happens. The video goes up into the cloud and there's a three hour cache and it gets recorded over for three hours. Even if you don't have a subscription, it just keeps getting recorded over and over again. But when the suspect, we can put up more of the video. Again, when the suspect pulled off the camera, you know what happened? There was no video to rerecord over the original three hours. So by the suspect pulling off the camera himself, he's the one that left evidence that ultimately will incriminate him. All right, turning now to a very, very, very important story. It is a subject that liberals are literally melting down over, and that is the climate agenda that President Trump is literally dismantling in a way that I don't think no other president has ever done it. I mean, he has put a dent in the climate agenda scam like you had not believed. And if you don't believe me on this, listen to how the media is reacting to all of this.

[B]

Tonight, President Trump has repealed US Power to regulate climate in this country. The president officially rejecting the science. And what? This now clears the way for critics tonight arguing this is not only dangerous for the environment, but for your health.

[A]

All right, so, so there. They have to admit it. And by not admit, by admitting it is really something else, to say the least. Now, my favorite part of the rollback from President Trump is this from Lee Zeldin. And as a cherry on top, we are ending the federal government's push to get manufacturers to install that Obama switch, the almost universally despised start stop feature. There will be no more climate participation trophies awarded to manufacturers for making Americans cars die at every red light and stop sign. It's over, done, finished. You know, there's nothing more I hate than that start and stop button that I have to press at the light to make sure my car keeps running so it doesn't keep shutting off. Thank you, Lee Zeldin, and thank you, President Trump. Well, joining me now, Climate Depot publisher Mark Morano, who's really been on the front lines of, I think, pushing a lot of these rollbacks and getting the administration to take action. I give you a big thank you and Climate Depot a big thank you. Mark Morano.

[C]

Well, thank you, Grant. This is so monumental and I know it Sounds to a lot of people like it's just some bureaucratic regulation at the epa. How's it going to affect my life? I mean they're already estimating that new car costs could drop, you know, $2500, $2400 is estimate. And you mentioned the auto stop start. That's a significant thing. These were all regulations imposed during the Obama administration on the issue of auto stop start. That literally is just an accounting trick that is employed by the, by the Obama administration to force automakers into adding that to a car. Because there's 30 seconds or a minute you're off. The car shuts off at a light, you're saving gas, right? But you're meanwhile damaging your engine, you're damaging your starter. You have to have an auxiliary battery in many cases, which then can damage the main battery. They don't last as long. It complicates and increases costs and it does nothing. It's just an accounting trick on a piece of paper. So they can claim on paper that they saving more gas mileage in their fleet vehicles. Well, they're going after this one, two punch. They pulled us out of the 1992 Earth Summit Treaty, the Rio Earth Summit which George W. Bush signed. That gets us out of the international climate scam. And now this week they're going after the endangerment finding which is a brainchild of the Obama administration. Remember, they couldn't pass their climate bill in Congress. So what they do, presto, we don't need no stinking democracy. You know what they did? They said we're going to have unelected mid level bureaucrats at the epa, regulate every aspect of the US Economy, including cars, including agriculture, including gas stoves, you name it, they were going to regulate it without a consent or vote of Congress by using the decades earlier past Clean Air Act. Trump administration is going after it. And finally, now I got to tell you this, Grant, finally, finally, heads are exploding on the climate actors. They've been relatively quiet the past year, but this was a bridge too far. Washington Post. Trump repeals US Government's Power to regulate climate. Who knew that Trump was a wizard? He could regulate the climate and now the government can't regulate the climate anymore. The New York Times, you showed the ABC clip. Environmentalists are going crazy. Dennis Hayes, the founder of Earth Day, everything he'd worked for his entire life is crumbled in the last few months.

[A]

Well, let me play a clip of Lee zeldin here, cut 24. Because all of this, you call him the most consequential administrator of the epa, maybe in history. Let me play Lee Zeldin this EPA is committed to providing clean air for all Americans. Powering the Great American Comeback is based on the singular focus of providing clean air, land and water for, for all Americans while harnessing the greatness of the American economy. That's a big difference from our predecessor. We believe that we can and must choose both. Mark, this CO2 endangerment that you talked about, can you explain in layman's terms why this is important and this will really make a big difference?

[C]

Yes, this was the legal justification for all of the net zero green New Deal climate agenda imposed on America. Remember, Congress never voted for Obama's climate bill. Congress never voted to ratify the UN Paris Senate, never voted to ratify the US Senate agreement. So what they did is use this, which was authorized by the Supreme Court, and they actually had a ruling that the EPA was allowed to regulate carbon dioxide under the epa, under the Clean Air Act. And so what they did is they were able to justify anything and everything. Well, look at that, cars. That's affecting human health. We need to regulate it due to climate change, because climate change will affect you enough. They're not regulating real pollutants. And that's the key here. What's happened is climate change has hijacked the entire environmental movement to the point where East Palestine lead in the drinking water, toxic waste, all these things were neglected in this pursuit of going after a trace essential gas in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide, which we exhale from our mouth. So it was the regulatory basis for the entire domestic climate con. As I mentioned, the 1992 treaty, which Trump is pulling out, was the entire legal basis for the international and UN climate con. So this is a one, two punch and it's just glorious because now you're seeing the anger and the key here is, and this is the part that makes it, that makes them really angry. It makes it much harder for President aoc, much harder for President Gavin Newsom in the future to come in and just get us back in the UN because now you theoretically need to have it resign a new treaty, have it submitted and have the Senate ratify it. And you're going to need a new endangerment finding with the court's blessing if the Trump administration can get the Supreme Court to allow this, overturn this repeal. So that would be monumental and it would actually save American jobs and everything into the future and save us from a regulation by unelected bureaucrats. And if they're successful in doing this, all Right.

[A]

I want to do this real quick because I'm short on time here. To the guys behind the glass, get cut. 17 ready. This is Gavin Newsom. 17, this is Gavin Newsom in Munich. My buddy Brian Glenn brought this up. This is another one of these climate conferences. I don't know he's running for president, but he spends more time overseas talking about the climate roll. Gavin Newsom, I hope if there's nothing else I can communicate today. Donald Trump is temporary. He'll be gone in three years. California is a stable and reliable partner in this space and it's important for folks to understand the temporary nature of this current administration in relationship to the issue of climate change and climate policy. I'll just say this. What they have done in California has crushed people financially. It hasn't worked. I'll give you the last word about whether this is temporary or not from President Trump if you can. 20 seconds.

[C]

Yeah, this is the key. Permanence. That's the word. And what Trump's second term is doing is trying to make these changes permanent so the next Democrat president can't come in. So Gavin Newsom is saying all this. He's worried if they're successful and they're going to require legal cases, they will have permanence and they will cripple the climate agenda in the future, no matter how much ambition they have.

[A]

That is amazing stuff. As always, Mark Morano, it is good to see you. I urge people to head over to Climate Depot. Thank you, my friend.

[C]

Thanks a lot, Grant.

[A]

Absolutely. All right, folks, listen up. International disputes, inflation, rising national debt, digital currency. There is a never ending list of reasons gold has risen over 700% in the last 20 years. And a never ending list of reasons smart Americans diversify a portion of their savings into precious metals with Birch Gold Group. Birch Gold can help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA. And gold. Just text America to the number 989898 to receive your free info kit. On Gold. There's no obligation, just useful information. Text America to the number 989-898. Do it today.

[D]

All right.

[A]

An LA mayorial candidate promises to be worse than Zohran Mamdani. We get into that next.

[B]

Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public, you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers, growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comdisclosures I think.

[D]

When you're diagnosed with cancer, you crave a semblance of normalcy and control. And so work allowed me to be me. So I think it's really important that companies stay flexible. Cancer in a diagnosis can be all consuming, but it doesn't have to be.

[E]

Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place.

[D]

For healing, learn more and sign the [e-mail].

[A]

Welcome back everyone. Now to Ground Zero of the Left Agenda. The Democrats in Los Angeles, California now have a doozy for you. Uh, in order to replace Karen Bass, they have to come up with another radical mayoral candidate. Enter a woman by the name of Nithya Rahman. Nithya Rahman may be worse than Mamdani out there in New York. Would you like to see a list of her campaign promises? Let's put these up. How about seize private housing to convert to public housing. Seize it. Decommission Men's Central Jail with no replacement. Shift to 100% renewable energy by 2035. Good luck. Replace armed police with unarmed alternatives. Decriminalize all drug use and noncitizen voting in local elections. Now Spencer Pratt, the reality TV star whose house burned down in the fires last year. He is running to be mayor of New York, of Los Angeles, and he's calling out Nithya Raman. Nithya Raman is a perfect example. When defunding the police was trendy with their base, she leaned in. When activists demanded it, she rolled with the mob. Now that families are less safe and too afraid to walk around their own neighborhoods, suddenly she's against it. How is anyone supposed to trust her. What is her real position? Is she the lunatic activist who wants to turn L. A into the Purge or not? All right, so he talks about how now she's saying, well, she wants to support the police. But he is right. Our crew went back and found this 2020 tweet from her. And it reads, the path is not complicated. Fund services, fund housing, fund care. Defund the police. Well, nobody knows LA like the host of the Morning Answer out there on AM8.70. I'm talking about Jennifer Horn. Jen, welcome to the program.

[D]

Thank you, Greg. Great to see you.

[A]

All right, I'm going to tip everybody off. We were talking and you said we need to cover this Nithya Ramen because he's worse than Mom. Donnie.

[F]

What.

[A]

What is it about her, other than what I just read, that makes her so bad?

[D]

Well, I'm going to tell you that Nithya Rahman, you know, New York got. Got Zoran Mamdani, and Nithya Rahman said, hold my beer, I'm coming for Los Angeles. She is to the far left of Karen Bass. We know that the mayor of Los Angeles is awful.

[H]

She.

[D]

I think a coffee mug or a rock would do a better job as mayor than. Than Karen Bass. But Nithya Rahman is a Democrat Socialist. She's part of the dsa. She has their endorsement. The Democrat Party asked her to get into this race because they want two Democrats to go into the general election with these, these local elections. What happens in California is that if one candidate cannot get 50% plus one, well, then they have to go to a runoff. And so Spencer Pratt, I was just listening to an interview with him just a few moments ago with NBC News. He feels that Nithya Rahman was actually put into this race to drive him out. Because it is possible that going head to head, Spencer Pratt could beat Karen Bass outright. She is that unpopular. But Nithya Rahman, you went through her rap sheet, but you forgot one of my personal favorites, Grant. She wants to, you know, LA has very few nice things these days. We have homeless encampments. We have craziness. But we do have some golf courses. And Nithya Rahman wants to reclaim the golf courses to put up public housing for people, low income housing for people who are experiencing homelessness.

[A]

This is what liberals. They take everything fun and they want to ruin it and then give it to poor people who then will ruin it even more, by the way. So she wants to scoop up all the. All the. All the golf courses. That's just great. You know, it's interesting, you Say this about Karen Bass. So Karen Bass is rerunning. She's been a disaster. I think everybody in LA knows she's been a disaster. Disaster. So the idea then would be that Nithya Rahman and Karen Bass would get the top two spots and Spencer's out. Is that it?

[D]

That's the idea. Because right now you've got another Democrat, Socialist of America in the race. No one really knows her. Austin Buettner sadly lost his daughter on the side of the road. She was found dead on the side of the road up in Antelope Valley. And so he's just dropped out of the race. He would have been more moderate, a Democrat still, but more moderate than Karen Bass. And so it was just going to be, by and large, Karen Bass against Spencer Pratt. So Nithya Raman is seen as a, as a spoiler in this race, but she also has a really bad reputation, Grant. She was an urban planner, she was an activist. You know what all of that means? Very, very liberal. She got into politics just a few years ago on the city council as one of the most liberal left leaning voices on the city council. And, and now she is looking to say whatever she thinks it'll take to get elected. People have called her gypsies on my radio show that she's like a gypsy because she'll tell you what you want to hear and then sell you a little snake oil and move on down the on the road. So she's dangerous because she knows how to lie and people don't know enough about her to do the research and check out who she really is.

[A]

Yeah, and there's enough dumb voters out there, with all due respect to the dumb voters out there that would vote for somebody like that, which is what's so scary. All right, next up is one of our favorite topics is homelessness and the homeless crisis that is Los Angeles. There is a study that came out. Let me put up graphic number eight, please. Of the $418 million spent on homelessness, 3 million went to hygiene stations, mobile showers, laundry trucks, 4.3 million on sidewalk cleanups, medical services, hygiene products. 13.6 million went to street medicine and moving assistance. And Karen Bass has this Inside Safe program. Jen, when you add up the numbers, it's awful expensive to get a room with her Inside Safe program, isn't it?

[D]

So the Inside Safe program basically puts homeless people in hotel rooms, which, by the way, they absolutely trash and they become a disaster. And those hotels are no longer usable. But the cost of putting a homeless person in this program is $86,000 and change a year. Now if you put them in interim housing like most people would suggest around Los Angeles, the cost is actually just. It's over. Less than double. You only spend over $30,000 to house someone in interim housing. You spend 86,000 on her homeless program inside these hotel rooms and that comes out to about 226 to $227 a night. So they're staying in pretty terrible hotels. Paying a premium price. The hotels have to make money here because guess what? These hotels are not going to be rentable to someone like you or me. Grant. When a homeless guy gets done living in them, it's, It's a pretty ridiculous 418 million in L A and only 10% of it actually went to housing people.

[A]

Only 10%. I just ran the numbers, by the way. In LA county, the median household income is $87,000. That's household. That could be two, three people in a household. Household income, $87,000. We're spending that to put one homeless person up in a room. It's craziness. Let's hope these, these lunatics don't get anywhere. Spencer Pratt would be fun to have as mayor of la, that's for sure. Jennifer Horn, it's always great to see you. Thank you for coming on tonight. Night.

[D]

Thank you so much. He's a little Trump tastic. I like it. Thank you, Grant.

[A]

Trump tastic is it at Jennifer Horn is where you can find her. Always good to see Jen. All right, tomorrow and Sunday folks. Don't miss our new war room special detailing the ins and outs of the Tina Peters case. You know the election official sent to prison, wrongfully imprisoned. It marks her 500th day Sunday. Uh, and to mark the occasion, Steve Bannon will break down her legal proceedings alongside her legal team and also discuss the broader implications of her story tomorrow. This special will air at 11am Eastern and again on Sunday at 2pm Eastern. Be sure to tune in. All right, a little movement being made in the Nancy Guthrie case. We put our body language analyst Greg Hartley on the manhunt.

[B]

Support for the show comes from public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public, you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures I.

[D]

Need to be healthy every day to survive it and go through the next chemo round and the next chemo round. So it's important that work was part of that to keep my mind busy for 8, 9 hours and then I had to go back and face the reality. I had a goal and the goal is to survive.

[E]

Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place.

[D]

For healing, learn more and sign the [e-mail].

[A]

All right, welcome back everyone. Time now for our body language segment. My favorite segment of the week. I want to bring in the host of the behavior panel on YouTube. He is a former military interrogator. Body language and behavior expert Greg Hartley is with us. Greg, welcome to the program.

[E]

Hey Grant, thanks for having me.

[A]

All right, everybody has seen this surveillance video of the suspect in the Nancy Guthrie case. What do you see here? I was eager to have you break down the body language here.

[E]

Well, let me first tell you, I've seen a lot of body language guys doing crystal ball kind of BS where they're telling you what it all means. We can't tell what it. What I'm going to tell you is what I actually see also give you one credential you might not know I have. I spent a good portion of my life in anti terror and kidnapping hostage survival. So I can talk a little with a little bit of authority in there. But pay attention to the fact this guy walks toward the gate, goes over immediately away from two obliques with the camera is coiled his body so that you can't see much about him and then moves to the camera and puts his hand up there. It's pitch black as far as we can tell. Which tells you one of the things that hostage takers do all the time is they do a lot of reconnaissance before they show up. Either somebody's told him it's there, or he's been there and seen it because he puts his hand in the right place to cover it and then moves his body into place. Really interesting.

[A]

Now if. If he was there and knew about it, why would he take the brush? We see him go and take the brush and cover. Wouldn't you just take a piece of duct tape and cover it up?

[E]

Well, let's think. What I would do in my world is either take a hammer, knock it off, or spray it with some kind of spray paint, because that's quicker and more rapid. But if you know that, for example, that thing is not connected, you may disassemble it and think you're taking the camera with you and you want to cover it up as you're monkeying around with it. The person here is showing. The only thing that makes me wonder if this person knows her is they seem to be okay with their face being exposed after they start doing this. That could indicate they're not very smart. Could indicate they're under some kind of substance. There's all kinds of things that could indicate. But we don't have a crystal ball, so we really can't tell you that.

[A]

All right, do we show the second one? Oh, we showed the second one of the. Of the. Of that there was new footage released of another suspect. I wondered what you thought of this. We'll roll that and let you talk about. This was from TMZ a few miles away, same night.

[E]

Yep. Yeah. So one other thing to pay attention to his body shape. One of the things that these guys are going to look at is look at the upper four, the forearm length compared to the lower arm. You'll be able to tell. This doesn't look like the same guy to me. Number one, because his forearm seems to be longer, it puts his elbow at a lower place. Now, there's some benefit of the backpack pulling back on it. But if you look at those two things, you can start to get a different image of a person. Now, the one thing that is interesting is why would a guy be trying to get rid of a backpack that he would show up with 19 minutes later at the crime scene, Unless it was trying to hand it off to someone else who was using it. So what we know is that most kidnappings. Now go back to my other personality. Most kidnappings are not a one person job. This lady weighs 150 pounds, and she's. If she's difficult to move or inanimate. That's really tough for one person to pick up, take to the road, and move with a backpack and everything else. So my immediate brain goes to there's more than one person involved, so I'd start looking there.

[A]

You know, with the amount of blood that was on the steps that we saw. He did take the camera, which I just talked earlier about how him taking the camera actually stopped it from the cash overwriting itself every three hours. So he actually preserved the video of him unknowingly in the Google Drive. But maybe somebody a second. It could have easily been a second person. Help bring that person out then.

[E]

Well, if you really want to know whether there's a second person or not, take the very first video or any of this video when he's going back to pick up the weeds. What we look for is a person who's in fight or flight. Fight or flight would cause him to be jacked, and his emotions would be all through the roof, and he'd be moving like a wooden machine. You would see him look very different. His respiration would be up. But if he's got a spotter sitting 50 yards, 100 yards behind him, he doesn't have to worry about that. He may have a signaling device or something so he can feel comfortable working in the dark and doing whatever else he needs to do. So it makes me think I said one of three things. Either he's got a chemical in his system, he's done a hell of a lot of reconnaissance and feels. Well, feels safe, or he's got a spotter or combination of all three.

[A]

Yeah, yeah, fascinating stuff. Okay. They had detained a person earlier in the week, and he went in front of all the cameras and started talking. So I thought it'd be interesting to play him and have you break down his body language.

[E]

Okay.

[G]

I was detained the whole time.

[E]

Okay.

[G]

That's what they told me.

[E]

Where were they?

[A]

In the back of a car. Back Miranda car. And then they move me into a Pima county sheriff.

[E]

Were you being questioned in the car?

[A]

At the Marana car, I was being questioned, but they only asked me for.

[F]

My first name, my last name, my.

[A]

Date of birth, and my social.

[E]

Okay, what. What were they asking you about?

[A]

I wore my whereabout, Greg. My belief was this guy wasn't the guy. But your thoughts?

[E]

Well, you know, I've watched two videos. This is one. I've watched another. The only thing that I did see that, look, these investigators are going to find red flags. There's no such thing as an Indicator of deception only indicators that a person's feeling uncomfortable. Watch that blink rate. That would make you go, why is he blinking so much? That gets people's attention. In one of the other videos, he's using his hands a lot to talk until he comes to the issue of where he was, and then his hands drop. That would be a red flag for them, too. The other red flag would be lack of thrusting your chin, saying, I didn't do it. He used a word like, honestly, those kinds of things. It's kind of like one of those little herding dogs. If you run, they come after you. That gets law enforcement all over you if you red flag them.

[A]

Well, let me push back on. On one thing in the blink rate. All right? If. If. If you have a whole slew of TV cameras around you and you were just held up by the police, I think you'd be pretty nervous.

[E]

Well, yeah, that's the reason. None of this is a good indicator of deception, Grant. It's a good indicator of stress. You and I are not uncomfortable in front of a camera, but you do it every day, and I do it a lot. This guy may have never been in front of a camera in his life. So we have to look for a cluster of behaviors, and then they ask questions to find out whether there's a root cause. That's what they do.

[A]

Interesting. Interesting. Okay, here's another interesting one. We'll have to do it fairly quickly. Jennifer Newsom. This is Gavin Newsom's wife at a Planned Parenthood event. She looked off at this event. I'm going to play the clip. Go ahead.

[D]

Go for you wonder why we have such a horrific war on women in this country and that these guys are getting away with it because you don't seem to care. So I just offer that with love. These are. You have incredible women in this room, and you have these allies. Ask about what we're here for today.

[A]

Don't you think there were other parts that got even crazier, Greg? Yeah.

[E]

Well, this is funny because she's doing this. She looks like Gavin Newsom kind of. And then suddenly she takes her elbows away from her sides once she get relief. So she's feeling stress in the beginning, and then when they laugh, she moves her arms and starts to get comfortable. So it's. It's a permission for her to do whatever is natural for her.

[A]

She had dry mouth. Does that indicate anything? Because she talks in front of the cameras pretty often. I don't know why she would get dry mouth here.

[E]

Well, and you you can. This is one of the beautiful things about body language. You can only indicate that something has caused stress and had a person become dry in their mouth. It could have been an argument before she walked on stage. It could be anything because all of that fight or flight is tied up. I always say we don't know the difference between a tiger chewing our ass and her wife chewing her ass.

[A]

Do you know, I watched as she started yelling at the media and everything. She did some real crazy thing. I thought she might have been on drugs.

[E]

Quite frankly, I didn't see this one. I'd have to watch it again.

[A]

All right, Greg Hartley, it's always great to see you. This was a good one. We appreciate you. Thank you.

[E]

Real pleasure. Thank you.

[A]

Absolutely. All right, folks, you can go to Greg's website, readbody language.com and of course his YouTube show, the Behavior Panel. And up next February is National Cancer Prevention Awareness Month. What can you do to lower your cancer chances? That's next.

[B]

Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures I.

[D]

Need to be healthy every day to survive it and go through the next chemo round and the next chemo round. So it's important that work was part of that. To keep my mind busy for eight, nine hours and then I had to go back and face the reality. I had a goal and the goal is to survive.

[E]

Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and Cancer recovery. We can make work a better place.

[A]

For healing, learn more and sign the.

[D]

Pledge at working with cancer pledge dot com.

[A]

I'll tell you what, folks. I saw this story about colorectal cancer being on the rise in a very big way and not just in any demographic, but in 20s, 30s and 40 year olds. So I thought, why? Why is colorectal cancer now all of a sudden taking over young people? And you know what, I go right to the vaccine, the COVID jab. We can't even really call it a vaccine. I want to bring in now to discuss all of this. Chief of maternal and prenatal health at the wellness company, Dr. James Thorpe is with us. Dr. Thorpe, it's great to see you.

[H]

Thanks for having me back, Grant.

[A]

All right, Dr. Thorpe, you've been on the forefront of studying the jab. You've seen these reports of colorectal cancer on the rise. Can you draw a link here? Is there anything to take away from this?

[H]

It's irrefutable what you said and what you opened up with the COVID 19 vaccines caused a massive increase in cancer, explosive cancers, cancers all over the body, but especially the breast, colorectal ancreas, lung, ovarian, many others. This is now irrefutable. There are two extremely large studies, over 300,000 participants from Italy and over 8 million grant from South Korea. Both of these studies show a significant anywhere from 4 to 8 fold increase in these cancers. So this is no longer speculation and there's a lot of things that we can do to really mitigate that risk. You can't undo a vaccination. But remember, 13 plus billion shots of the COVID 19 genetic therapy were given to over five and a half billion global people. And it's caused vaccine associated immune deficiency syndrome vaids. And that includes an increase in cancer, increase in infections. So there are important things we can do. Number one, probably everybody vaccinated should get the antibody test to spike protein. And if that's really high and it can only be quantified at LabCorp, you can order it yourself. 60 bucks. You know, I have friends where it's over 25,000. Over 25,000. And these individuals are, I believe, at very high risk of cancer. And then we can doc them on really quick.

[A]

I need to focus in on this because we only have a couple of minutes. But I know you're going to talk about the spike detox from the wellness company, which is very important. There's also the product shield that was developed by Dr. Victory who had had breast cancer she's been on this show many times. Maybe a combination of the both the Ultimate Spike Detox and Shield. Can you talk about this new product.

[B]

Shield for me, the new product Shield.

[H]

Is really an awesome product. It's comprised of two components, a cocoa drink and two soft gels. And the cocoa drink they have in combination, they have nine natural botanicals, all nine of which have shown that they have an association with cancer reduction risk. This is a very safe product. It's very well tolerated and it may well reduce your risk and prevent cancers in the future along with other very important issues. Obviously not smoking, weight loss, exercise, diet.

[A]

All right, well, let me tell people how they could get the product. I always appreciate you coming on the program, Dr. James Thorpe. And here's what you do, folks. You check out the wellness company's website, TWC Health Voice. That is where you can find their full line of products, including prescription medical kits. I've got one right here, Ivermectin. In this kit as well, there's parasite cleanses and much more. That's TWC Health forward slash voice. Use that promo code voice to save 10% and I will tell you, I don't think it's a coincidence. Every day I hear from somebody who lost a loved one or a friend of cancer at an age way younger than I used to hear about people dying of cancer. I'm telling you, do something about it. If you took the vaccine, get on the Spike Detox, get on SHIELD and take control of your life back. All right. Leftists have a very colorful way of showing support for Don Lemon. We'll talk about that coming up next.

[B]

Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public, you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services. By open to The Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comDisclosures When I.

[A]

Was diagnosed, all I wanted to do was get back to work.

[H]

I wanted to get back to that.

[A]

Trajectory that I was on prior to the cancer.

[H]

I always felt like I had value.

[E]

I had a place on the team.

[A]

To just be treated with dignity.

[H]

It means everything.

[E]

Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place.

[D]

For healing, learn more and sign the [e-mail].

[A]

Welcome back, everyone. Our commander in chief today in Fort Bragg to say thank you to our troops, our special forces. Listen to that. It's music to my ears, no pun intended. To say a big thanks for that raid that went off so smoothly. He got a huge applause. They love him. They love him. He is the commander in chief, the of. Of all commander in chiefs. And I'm glad he got to spend some time with the soldiers. Of all soldiers, members of the special forces at Fort Bragg. All right, on to a guy who is the complete opposite of President Trump, Don Lamon, this complete dope. Well, he pled not guilty today to the charges against him. Protesters showed up. I mean, I'll let you see if you could figure out what they have here. So we have to digitize what they're shaking there. Oh, you can kind of see it right there. A purple monster is what we call that. Why sex toys? What does that have to do anything? Oh, I know why. Maybe because all of them are real. Richard Noggins. You know what I mean, Richard, that's bad. That's gonna do it for us tonight. It's a family show. I'm sorry, but it's Friday night and all kinds of things happen on Friday night. Stitch shields, army rolls. Thanks to all of you. Don't Forget my website, Grantstinchfield.com we'll see you back here Monday. Thanks for watching.

[D]

I think when you're diagnosed with cancer, you crave a semblance of normalcy. And so work allowed me to be me. So I think it's really important that companies stay flexible. Cancer in a diagnosis can be all consuming, but it doesn't have to be.

[E]

Research shows there is a significant connection between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place.

[A]

For healing, learn more, and sign the.

[D]

[e-mail] this is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed human.