Loading summary
Grant Stinchfield
This is an iHeart podcast.
Sponsor/Announcer
Guaranteed Human support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures well,
Grant Stinchfield
the holidays have come and gone once again, but if you've forgotten to get that special someone in your life a gift, well, Mint Mobile is extending their holiday offer of half off unlimited wireless. So here's the idea. You get it now, you call it an early present for next year. What do you have to lose? Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch limited time 50% off regular price for new customers.
Sponsor/Announcer
Upfront payment required $45 for 3 months,
Grant Stinchfield
$90 for 6 month or $180 for
Sponsor/Announcer
12 month plan taxes and fees. Extra speeds may slow after 50 gigabytes
Grant Stinchfield
per month when network is busy.
Greg Hartley
See terms I think when you're diagnosed with cancer you crave a semblance of normalcy and control. And so work allowed me to be me. So I think it's really important that companies stay flexible. Cancer in a diagnosis can be all consuming, but it doesn't have to be. Research shows there is a significant connection
Jeffrey Degner
between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place
Grant Stinchfield
for healing, learn more and sign the pledge@workingwithcancerpledge.com. Good evening everyone. Welcome to Stingfield. So President Trump has good reason to be mad today with this Supreme Court decision basically tossing out his tariffs under that economic emergency provision that he was using them under. But if President Trump had anyone to be mad at. I think it should be the ones who offered up nominating these three judges, because these three Supreme Court justices are traitors. Of course, I'm talking about Amy Coney, Barrett. Now, Roberts, he didn't get to nominate. You expect it from Roberts. But the other one was Gorsuch. What are these. These justices thinking this was a bad decision to side with the liberals now? It's not the end of the world. These tariffs are not going away, folks. I can promise you that. But President Trump wasn't happy, especially with his two picks there. He called them lap dogs and fools. And then there's this. The Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs is deeply disappointing. And I'm ashamed of certain members of the court, absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country. So, look, I could break down the details of provision 206, 132, 307, whatever all these numbers are, the American people could give a rat's ass about what the numbers are and the regulations. We just want to know, is the president allowed to do this or not? The Supreme Court ruling today said the President can't do it under the provision he was using. I disagree with them, so does Clarence Thomas. But most certainly the President can do this, which means these tariffs really aren't going anywhere. In the meantime, as he has to work out some details, he put a 10% tariff globally on everyone. Here's Trump now. They're an automatic. Now, just like in Congress, they're an automatic no. They're against anything that makes America strong, healthy, and great again. They also are a, frankly, disgrace to our nation. Those justices, they're an automatic no. No matter how good a case you have, it's a no. But you can't knock their loyalty. It's one thing you can do with some of our people. Foreign influence, I don't know. The reality is President Trump was using the International Emergency Economic Powers act, that goes by ia to institute these tariffs under an emergency. And what we faced, I believe, was a national security emergency when it came to the trade deficits, when it came to the trade war that China was waging on us and other countries. So it's all about ipa, which means you throw IP out and you do it another way. This was Secretary Besson. I was with him today in Dallas.
Jeffrey Degner
Despite the misplaced quoting from Democrats, ill
Greg Hartley
informed media outlets, and the very people
Grant Stinchfield
who gutted our industrial base, the court
Jeffrey Degner
did not rule against President Trump's tariffs. Six justices simply ruled that IA authorities
Greg Hartley
cannot be used to raise even $1 of revenue.
Grant Stinchfield
So again, they'll go back to other provisions that he can raise revenue under. You've got to have some studies play out. It could take a few months for this to happen. Which is why I think he didn't want to use those provisions the first time around, because he could do it quicker under ipa. But Clarence Thomas summed it up the best. Now, folks, when you talk about Clarence Thomas as a Supreme Court justice, I'm here to tell you I think he's the greatest constitutional scholar, the greatest Supreme Court justice we have ever had, and we've had a lot of good ones. When this guy says something, I trust him. Well, as you can imagine, he was in the dissent, and he put it very clear. He basically summed it up by saying Congress authorized the President to regulate importation. Longstanding court cases have upheld that. Congress has given the President the ability to regulate importation. Under that alone, this should have stood. Now the Supreme Court wants Congress to have a role in this. Well, why doesn't just Speaker Johnson call the Congress back into place? John Thune call the Senate. Let's vote it in. We're in control. Get it done. Well, we can't do it because we can't get it done because we won't throw out the filibuster in the Senate just like trying to get the DHS bill passed. And the whole thing's a mess because we got a lot of Republicans with no spine. And the media then, of course, is salivating over all this, thinking this is a big victory.
Jeffrey Degner
Well, I believe the court declared the
Grant Stinchfield
tariffs unlawful when imposed, So I expect
Sponsor/Announcer
to get all the money back.
Grant Stinchfield
We spent more than $10 million in 2025, and I don't know what we've spent in 2026. So it will be a lot of money, and we can use it. It's our money, and we want to spend it. So you're looking to get back. You said about 10 million. Did I hear that right? Yeah, at least 10 million. It probably will be more. And they owe us interest, too. All right, so that's Ms. Now, I guess they go by. And that was the CEO of Learning Resources, which was one of the plaintiffs in this case that went to the Supreme Court. It's a toy company. He's not getting that money back. Let me tell everybody out there, it is so complicated right now. In many cases, consumers did pay for this. I know because I have friends that paid like, crazy stuff when they bought clothes from Europe and they were paying crazy amounts of money for it. So I know that consumers did pay some foreign entities, paid some. How are you going to pay all this back? And the court case is going to be so drawn out fighting not to pay it back. And the worst part is the Supreme Court justices didn't even address it. And they could have, but they didn't. Here's Kevin o', Leary, a voice of reason. Understand the pressure point now. If $150 billion has to go back, the people that paid it want it back. It would have been better on a practical basis to have not done this, I think. But it's history. It's water under the bridge now for the president or for the Supreme Court not to have struck. No, no, the Supreme Court, they've caused a nightmare here. They called it a mess themselves. What am I supposed to do next? It's true. And the Supreme Court justices even admitted that it's a mess. I want to bring in now to discuss this economist with the American Institute for Economic Research, Jeffrey Degner is with us. Jeffrey, welcome to the program. Thanks for having me. All right. What did you make of today's ruling?
Jeffrey Degner
Well, as you said, it's complicated and a couple of things on the economic front. I actually reside in the state of Michigan and one of the challenges that's been presented in the data are for manufacturing jobs since April 2025 is that we've actually seen a net loss of about 42,000 jobs. That's a net loss after the April 2025 tariffs were put into place. Now, as Mr. O' Leary just said, indeed the court's decision, I think it's correct to say that it is water under the bridge at this point. Now we're see what happens next. Of course, the president immediately responded with that 10% across the board tariff on all nations. And as an economist, I get concerned about the knock on effects or the retaliation that may be coming not just from a few select nations but a broader coalition across the globe.
Grant Stinchfield
But here's the problem. We didn't really see that. In fact, every other nation rolled over to us. And you talk about this decline in manufacturing jobs and if you look at the last three months of gross domestic product from the last year fourth quarter, we had the, excuse me, from the trade deficit, we had the greatest decrease of trade deficit in recent American history. I mean this was working these tariffs.
Jeffrey Degner
Well, when we look at the GDP growth, I think we also need to account for government spending as a part of that. And with the new spending that's come through Adding to deficits. One of the things that, that we know when we measure GDP is that government spending, whatever it decides to spend on, does contribute to the overall GDP number. So there's a little give and take happening there in the overall GDP numbers.
Grant Stinchfield
Yes, except you have to say they're doing their best to get spending under control. And I would also offer up this, that inflation is now back under control. Government spending is the number one driver of inflation. And with what we're seeing now, with where the Trump administration is going, trying to rein this in and the revenues that we took in, we can't forget about that. At almost $200 billion, inflation is under control. Again, all of these fears sound like pre tariff fears that didn't really come true.
Jeffrey Degner
Jeffrey when it comes to the inflation numbers coming in lower, indeed CPI as measured in those consumer prices across the board have come down. But we have seen some underlying realities in the producer prices. Remember that inflation is still pos. It is still positive, even though at a lower number. And so for manufacturers facing some of these higher costs for production goods from the tariffs, but also from other pressures in the economy, this continues to be a little bit of a challenge for manufacturers.
Grant Stinchfield
Are you surprised at all that the inflation is as low as it is right now after these tariffs? I would have bet, listening to you now, that you would have predicted that inflation wouldn't be where it is today before these tariffs were instituted.
Jeffrey Degner
Well, economists are best left not making predictions about the future. I'm not a soothsayer for sure, but one of the things that we have to account for, whether it's Federal Reserve policy, new money creation, or whether it's taxes and the way in which they move through the economy, these changes don't happen overnight and they do have a lag effect. They take some time to show up. And some of the recent numbers do show that some of that pressure that manufacturers and businesses are facing as they are indeed paying higher prices for imported durable goods that they use to make goods and services.
Grant Stinchfield
I'll leave you with this food for thought as you go and continue to study this as an economist. Temporary staffing numbers, temporary staffing companies are doing very well. Latest report on that. When you go back and look at history and you see temporary staffing numbers start to increase, it's often the precursor of a major boom. And I think this is going to go for manufacturing as well here in the United States. I'll give you the last word, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey Degner
Well, with those job numbers, one of the things that I'm concerned About is that we also have the highest percentage of full time workers taking on additional jobs, the highest number since 2000. And that to me indicates that consumers and households recognize that they're facing inflationary pressure still after it's, it's cumulative, right? Because that's what households experienced. And of course, the Biden administration, there's great responsibility for the inflation that happened through the COVID era. But families have had to face the facts that they continue to face price pressure at the grocery store. And that has meant taking out a little extra work. It's actually the highest number full time folks taking additional work since.
Grant Stinchfield
Hold on a second, hold on a second. Hold on a second. Gas prices are way down. We know the grocery prices are down since Joe Biden was here. We know that inflation is back under control. When you talk about the job numbers, the job numbers, when they were creating jobs under Joe Biden, they were all government jobs. We now have a net decrease in government jobs as we see these things. These are all good news for the American economy. So I hope maybe we shake a little more sense into, into what you're looking at there. We clearly disagree on some of this, but I like having you on the program. It's a fun discussion. Jeffrey Dagger, thank you.
Greg Hartley
All right.
Grant Stinchfield
Thank you, buddy. I appreciate you coming on the program as always. Okay. That's always interesting. You know, sometimes we don't always do the give and take on this program. But he's nice guy. He's just a little misguided, that's all. All right, I want to move to another very, very important story. This is stunning, by the way. Between 2021 and 2025, Joe Biden years, okay, do you know 8% of the entire population of Nicaragua, okay, came to the United States illegally. This graphic that you see on your screen here, $6.2 billion was sent back to Nicaragua from the Nicaraguans who came here. That amounted to to 37% of the Nicaraguan gross domestic product. Now, was that a good idea for Joe Biden to bring in 8% of the population of Nicaragua only to have them send billions of dollars back to Nicaragua instead of keeping it here in the United States? No. Now think about this. It wasn't just Nicaragua. 7% of the entire population of Cuba came here. Now, I understand why they want to escape these crap hole countries, okay? I do. Six percent of Haitians came here. Those are the ones that were eating the dogs, remember? 6% of Haitians and 5% of the entire population of Honduras was here. This is crazy. When you look at these numbers. And these numbers were just released by the Department of Homeland Security. Now, here's the issue. President Trump, with his mass deportation plan, is making America safer. Our streets are safer than ever before. Yet you have governors in blue states and mayors and blue cities that are doing everything they can to keep America a dangerous place. In particular their blue states. A dangerous place like Maryland. Governor West Moore just signed an order to ban sheriffs in his state from working with ICE in Maryland. We will not allow untrained, unqualified and unaccountable agents to deputize our brave local law enforcement officers. Because Maryland is a community of immigrants. It is not our weakness. It's our strength. You know what I love? I love a community of immigrants. I do legal immigrants. I don't love a community of illegal immigrants. And I personally don't like a community filled with criminals. And the reality is that many of the people that came over here were most certainly criminals. And they've done great damage to this nation, both economically and physically with the crime that they've committed and the drain on our social services. So. So to tell your sheriffs that you're not allowed to work with ICE anymore, one, I believe it's unconstitutional. These sheriffs take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Now you want the good part of this story? This is where my faith in humanity is literally restored. You have bold sheriffs in Maryland who say, you know the old term, who got to you, Mr. Governor, we're going to work with ICE whether you like it or not. Listen to this. The abolishment of the 287 program is not the abolishment of ICE. They're going nowhere. In fact, they're going to intensify their efforts. We warned them this was going to happen and it's going to happen. It is the biggest betrayal to law enforcement and public safety that I have ever seen.
Dr. James Thorpe
There will be people missed. And that is my concern. To be people missed. And who will be re released into our communities who pose a threat.
Grant Stinchfield
So these sheriffs know the reality of the situation now, are they probably conservatives Make America Great Again Sheriffs. You better believe it. And they're also elected by the people who know what their people want and their people want safe communities. So it will take bold members of our society to stand up to these radical lunatics trying to make your life worse. So a big salute to those sheriffs in in Maryland that are pushing back. It reminds me of sheriffs in states like California and Colorado that were pushing back against gun laws. And says, hey, we wouldn't, we wouldn't enforce these radical gun laws on our people that were passed by the state legislature. Speaking of gun laws, you know, the war on the constitution by the left starts with the war on guns. The left is always going after good people and they do it through laws that attack the second amendment because they turn law abiding Americans into criminals the moment they pass these radical overreaching laws. There is a law now in California that's being discussed about 3D printers that if you have a 3D printer that could make a gun, okay, they're going to try to mandate there's a block inside that printer that won't print a gun. But the situation is none of these criminals are going out and printing guns. That's ridiculous. They're stealing it from your car or your house when they burglarize it. But anyway, this is a youtuber explaining the whole situation is it doesn't care about the machines. It just goes and says if you have the software, you're guilty. That's called a presumption of guilt, which is against the Constitution. You have. You are basically, you are innocent until proven guilty. Except with this law because it says specifically if you have the software, if you have the files, the ones and zeros, it is assumed that you are going to print a gun, which is illegal, thereby you've printed the gun as far as we're concerned, just from having the software, straight to jail. God forbid your 16 year old kid downloads one of these for his 3D printer and prints a plastic gun. Which by the way, I've seen some of these 3D printed guns that they're crude, they often don't work. At some point the technology will be there at home that you can do this, but it's not there yet. This is literally designed to entrap good people. Colorado now is doing the exact same thing with all of this.
Greg Hartley
But the files actually gets into the first amendment. This is more of a speech issue because what they're actually doing is they're turning information into contraband.
Grant Stinchfield
So what they're saying is that if
Greg Hartley
you possess these files or you distribute these files through any means, even, I mean, including electronics. So we're talking email, we're talking social media, Discord server on a website, maybe you comment on a post on social media, any sort of distribution of the files is now also criminalized.
Grant Stinchfield
Think about what it is. She's right. It is an assault on your first amendment. That's also an assault on your second amendment. Just possessing the files would make you a criminal. Do you know today if you possessed, I'm not recommending you do this, but if you possessed bomb making instructions, that is not in and of itself a crime. Now if you couple the bomb making instructions with bomb making materials and you have a plan to go out there and blow some innocent people up, then it is a crime. But simply reading how to make a bomb is not a crime. So simply reading how to make a gun would be a crime. That is insanity, folks. Insanity and lunacy. And now maybe the most offensive of all laws that will go effect into effect in Colorado, and it happens in August this summer, they are banning any, any semi automatic rifle or shotgun with a detachable magazine. Okay, now those on your screen are, who is exempt from this? Military contractors, law enforcement, of course, prison guards, armored vehicle companies, and the last one's rich Hollywood movie producers. They get a carve out in all of this. Now the other law, and this is by design by the way, is that if you have a gas operated semiautomatic pistol with a detachable magazine, now the gas operated is, is. We don't really have a definition. Would a recoil that also can use gas, would that fall under this? Would your Glock fall under this? The shorter answer, short answer is we don't know. And that is by design. They want the ambiguity of this law to outlaw basically every semiautomatic firearm in Colorado to entrap all of you good law abiding gun owners in that state. Now here's the reality. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this. If you have a firearm that is in common use, and there is nothing more common than an AR15 rifle or a Glock pistol, you can't outlaw it. So this will most certainly be overturned, this law. But here's the problem. It'll be drawn out in court and the left knows it. And that's bad news. All right folks, listen up. If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels or reduce swelling in your legs and feet, then you'll love these two American made health supplements. First is liver health formula. Fat deposits in the liver can pile on and make pounds on you and they make you feel tired. Liver health formula helps reduce fat deposits with nutrients like artichoke extract and milk thistle. Next is lymph system support. The natural ingredients in lymph system support help gently flush extra fluid and toxins out of the body, which can help reduce swelling in the legs and feet. And right now, for a limited time, you can get 35% off liver health formula lymph system support along with all 45 plus health supplements pure health Research has to offer. Head over to PureHealthResearch.com and use the coupon code grant at checkout. Today, lawmakers in Georgia are stepping up to identify the relationship of early vaccinations and infant deaths. We'll talk to one of the doctors sounding the alarm next. Foreign.
Sponsor/Announcer
Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures I
Grant Stinchfield
need to be healthy every day to survive it and go through the next chemo round and the next chemo round. So it's important that work was part of that to keep my mind busy for 89 hours and then I had
Greg Hartley
to go back and face the reality.
Grant Stinchfield
I had a goal and the goal is to survive.
Greg Hartley
Research shows there is a significant connection
Jeffrey Degner
between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery. We can make work a better place for healing.
Grant Stinchfield
Learn more and sign the pledge@workingwithcancerpledge.com if you're the purchasing manager at a manufacturing
Sponsor/Announcer
plant, you know having a trusted partner
Grant Stinchfield
makes all the difference.
Sponsor/Announcer
That's why hands down, you count on Grainger for auto reordering. With on time restocks, your team will
Grant Stinchfield
have the cut resistant gloves they need at the start of their shift and
Sponsor/Announcer
you can end your day knowing they've got safety well in hand. Call 1-800-Grainger clickgrainger.com or just stop by grainger for the ones who get it done.
Grant Stinchfield
Welcome back everyone. A new warning tonight about the COVID vaccine. You know, our friends over at the McCullough foundation have been doing such terrific work. Researcher Nicholas Holscher is on the front lines of really uncovering the dangers to this Covid. COVID vaccine experimental shot. Listen to this.
Dr. James Thorpe
RV vaccines have been linked to 2600% more deaths than measles infection since 1995. You can't make this stuff up. So for the past 30 years we the MMR shots have been killing more children, far more children than measles has.
Grant Stinchfield
And yet look at what we're doing here with this stuff. Still craziness that it's on the market, it should be pulled. And honestly, RFK Jr. Look, I like what he's trying to do at Health and Human Services, but man, you, you got to just say no, we're pulling this now. Young people are seeing massive increases in not only deaths but cancer rates. And then babies. Babies in the womb no less.
Dr. James Thorpe
And then when we get into pregnancy, we're looking at a substantial increase in miscarriages and birth defects, a substantial risk of fetal cardiac arrhythmia, fetal cardiac malformations, significant fetal growth slowing, significant reduction in amniotic fluid, fetal cardiac arrest.
Grant Stinchfield
Are you saying babies are having heart
Greg Hartley
attacks in the womb?
Dr. James Thorpe
Yes. The vaccine causes a significant inflammatory effect.
Grant Stinchfield
That's craziness. That's Dr. James Thorpe. Now his research has also shown that 80% of Sid's death, sudden infant death syndrome happened within two weeks of the vaccine. 40% a week of the vaccine. This has sparked the Georgia state legisl legislature to commission a study on the vaccine and sudden deaths in children and to look at the links there. Well, I want to bring in now the man you just saw on your screen. He is chief of maternal and Prenatal health at the Wellness Company. Dr. James Thorpe is back with us. Dr. Thorpe, it's good to see you.
Dr. James Thorpe
Thank you so much for having me back, Grant.
Grant Stinchfield
You know, I almost hate telling people out there about this because I know so many well intentioned mothers got the shot. I know there are people that are going to have a baby and maybe they had the shot and this scares people. But I feel it's my duty. I know you feel this way. We have to be warning people about this. Doctor.
Dr. James Thorpe
Yes. The COVID 19 vaccine was never fit for human use. It was a disaster. Even from the start, even by Pfizer's own data, their 10 week mandated post market series, there were 42,086 casualties. Including 1,223 dead. And many of those dead, they died within days, sometimes the same day, sometimes in the same hour as the vaccine was administered. Now, this is heretofore unprecedented. When I was up in Detroit, graduated from medical school up there at Wayne State University. In 1979 and 1976, we had the influenza pandemic and they rolled out the swine flu vaccine. It was a disaster. It wasn't anywhere near a disaster. There were only 28 deaths. A spate of cases of Guillain Barre syndrome. They immediately ripped it from the market. Just 26 deaths. The rotavirus vaccine for young children, turn of the century. There were no deaths, just a spate of cases of a bowel complication, which is repairable, called into susception. So what happened? And why wasn't that drug, vaccine, lethal vaccine, immediately pulled from the market? It was never safe, it was never effective, and it was never necessary.
Grant Stinchfield
Well, you know, I believe it's the money behind it. You have these statistics. 80% of Sid's death within two weeks of the vaccine. What do you say to the doctors out there who say, Dr. Thorpe, you're crazy, your numbers are wrong, and I'm not following your advice.
Dr. James Thorpe
Well, again, the pharmaceutical trolls or vaccine pushers can try to deny the data, but the simple fact of the matter is 26 years ago, 27 years ago, Dr. Andrew Wakefield from the United Kingdom was absolutely spot on and he was torched and he was literally his license removed for dare him to publish an article in the Lancet showing data where there was some safety concerns. But he's been completely vindicated. I mean, Nick Holscher, you looked at his work and all the publications that we've done together through the McCullough foundation and others. This is the peer reviewed literature. I've recently analyzed this and I've written on it. There's eight tiers of extreme publication bias. From the very top. Gates and others bought into the whole umbrella that controls all of the medical journals from the very top. They will not allow a publication that is adverse to their narrative. And the studies that did make it through, they will remove it. Now there's, there's several more tiers. The medical journals themselves are paid for and bought off by pharmaceutical dollars. All of them. And this is in peer. This isn't Jim Thorpe's opinion. This is in peer reviewed medical literature.
Grant Stinchfield
Yeah,
Dr. James Thorpe
the independent reviewers are bought off.
Grant Stinchfield
We saw that at the height of COVID when they were just basically scuttling these studies that were calling everything they were doing into question real quick on the SIDS deaths because so many of them. Is this just after the COVID vaccine or is this after vaccines in general?
Dr. James Thorpe
After the mmr? Mmrv. After the vaccines in general. You know, if you look at, you know, to be perfectly clear, sudden infant death syndrome is, is multifactorial. But the most, the cause which is avoidable and preventable is the vaccines. And again, not everybody, not every mother that gets a COVID vaccine when she's pregnant or not every child is going to have a disastrous complication. Right? I mean, in those COVID 19 shots, there were hot lots and there were lots that were much less dangerous.
Grant Stinchfield
It is true. That's what we've seen was that it looked like as you call them, hot lots that were more dangerous than others, which is why we've seen, you know, certain groups that had more problems than others. But I so appreciate the work you're doing on this. You raised this to my attention a little bit earlier in the week. I said I got to get you on for this and I appreciate you coming on on a Friday evening. Thank you, Dr. Thorpe.
Dr. James Thorpe
Thanks for having me on Grant. Have a good weekend.
Grant Stinchfield
Absolutely. You too. All right, folks, international disputes, inflation, rising national debt, digital currency. There is a never ending list of reasons gold has risen over 700% in the last 20 years. And a never ending list of reasons smart Americans diversify a portion of their savings into precious metals with Birch Gold group. Birch Gold can help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA and gold. Just text America to the number 989898 to receive your free info kit on gold. There's no obligation, just useful information. Text America to the number 989-898. Do it today. All right, it's Friday and that means our body language and behavior segment is back. Greg Hartley is with us. He's up next. Maybe we'll take a look at the boss.
Sponsor/Announcer
Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public, you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% more bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosure is available at public.com disclosures
Greg Hartley
I think when you're diagnosed with cancer, you crave a semblance of normalcy and control. And so work allowed me to be me. So I think it's really important that companies stay flexible. Cancer in a diagnosis can be all consuming, but it doesn't have to be. Research shows there is a significant connection
Jeffrey Degner
between the ability to continue to work and cancer recovery.
Greg Hartley
We can make work a better place
Grant Stinchfield
for healing, learn more and sign the pledge@workingwithcancerpledge.com. Welcome back everyone. Time now for my favorite segment of the week, which of course is our body language segment. So with that, let me bring in a host of the behavior panel on YouTube, which you really need to check out. By the way, folks, he is a former military interrogator, body language and behavior expert Greg Hartley is back with us. Greg, welcome back, buddy.
Greg Hartley
Pleasure.
Grant Stinchfield
All right, so let's check out President Trump. He's not happy about the Supreme Court ruling today tossing his tariffs out. Let's roll President Trump and then get your thoughts. In other words, I can destroy the trade, I can destroy the country. I'm even allowed to impose a foreign country destroying embargo. I can embargo, I can do anything I want, but I can't charge $1 because that's not what it says and that's not the way it even reads. Greg.
Greg Hartley
You know Grant, this is really easy. Anytime your brain and your mouth are saying the same thing, your body language will be very fluid. When your brain is saying one thing, your mouth is saying another is and we start to see glitchy behavior, he's pretty well punctuating your body language is fluidly punctuating what he's thinking. Any moving his hand across, ridiculing with his face. He looks frustrated. He looks like he's beaten down a little bit, lost a little energy because you're drop off there at the end. I think we hear disappointment. We also see frustration with what these what the Supreme Court wrote.
Grant Stinchfield
You know, I thought that in his speech today that he did look a little more disappointed than I've normally seen. I think it would have served him well to not portray this as such a defeat and maybe more as, hey, this is what we'll do to fight back.
Greg Hartley
Well, and I think you're right, but he. He does come across because his body language is doing what his brain is thinking, and we're seeing that. And, you know, there have been many other people who said there are four other ways to impose these tariffs, just not the way he was doing it. So I think he. Maybe you're right. Maybe a little bit longer would have been a good idea. Give it a day to cool off.
Grant Stinchfield
Yeah, yeah. He. He clearly not happy, and I don't blame him about that either. All right, here's one we haven't done in a while. I think we have analyzed Hillary Clinton before, but. But this is her on the BBC when she was asked about Bill and his pictures with Epstein.
Greg Hartley
And for your family, what was your reaction when you saw some of the material that has been released?
Grant Stinchfield
I'm thinking, for example, of images of
Greg Hartley
your husband apparently in a hot tub in a swimming pool on Epstein's plane. What was your reaction to that? And do you know the context surrounding
Grant Stinchfield
some of those images?
Jeffrey Degner
Absolutely.
Greg Hartley
And it wasn't a hot tub on a plane. It was one of the stops they made to look at philanthropic and charitable work that my husband has done, saving literally millions of lives,
Grant Stinchfield
because that's what we all do, is just hop in a hot tub over doing charitable work.
Greg Hartley
Well, Grant, I always say politicians like roaches. When the lights come on, their little subroutine start. She is the best at it. Watch her. Her face shows disapproval in the beginning, before anything happens. Look at that little head wobble. She's got hard eye contact. She pulls back the sides of her mouth. She's shaking. No, her hands are balled up. She's showing a whole lot of rejection. What's interesting is she does a classic Hillary Clinton. She parses words and redirects and then uses a Bill Clinton, and I'll walk you through the process. She first says hot tub on a plane. Well, there's another word between hot tub and plane. Swimming pool. She didn't mention the swimming pool on a plane. She chose words to make it ridiculous and go after it. She even smirks and does that amused smile to ridicule you as she's doing it. She does it to people all the time. And then she does the redirect he was doing things to help the rest of the world. Well, that's Bill Clinton right after he said, I didn't have sex with Monica Lewinsky, saying, I got to go back to work for the American people. That's wrapping yourself in higher ground. And then she does it, my favorite in the entire thing. She does a push, pull word. I always say it's someplace I'd want to grab.
Grant Stinchfield
And pull.
Greg Hartley
When she says it was not yet public knowledge of what he was doing, that doesn't mean she didn't know they were tied to the doj. They should have known this stuff. So it's interesting to see all that. And then you see her, once she pivots her brain and mouth, start saying the same thing, because now she's on her turf. Yeah, really wild.
Grant Stinchfield
She's good, isn't she? I mean, that's. That's the bottom. Even Trump said this week, Trump said, she's competent. Unlike the others, she's competent. She's just misguided. But she's good at this. And obviously, her husband may be the greatest master of all. Greg.
Greg Hartley
Oh, yeah. Well, you know, people like him, regardless of whether they like his politics. They like him, so he must be good at something. When people meet him, they always say, everything in the room disappears except you when he's talking to you. That's charisma. That's a way of working people and making people feel close to you. But she's good. She's not likable, but she's good.
Grant Stinchfield
Yeah, yeah. She's not likable at all. I don't. I don't like her one bit. Here's somebody else I always find myself. I want to like her, but I really don't because I listen to her on the View. And that's Whoopi Goldberg. This is Rich, because now she found herself in the Epstein files, which is. You can't get any better than this. Roll that. If you look. You know why my name is there? Because someone was looking for a plane. And that's what people do. They go to all the people who have private planes and say, do you have one? And you didn't get on the plane? I didn't get on the plane. I didn't know they were looking for a plane. I had no idea that the plane that I was supposed to be on was no longer available. So. So I'm named in there like, Whoopi Goldberg needs a plan. Craig, these people are so out of touch. This is what everybody does. They just go to their rich friends and see who's got a plane to look for.
Greg Hartley
But she's believable. We're back to her brain and her mouth are saying the same thing. So she's believable. She's fluid. She's punctuating. I, you know, I can't tell you I've ever watched the View except for on your show when it comes up once in a while.
Grant Stinchfield
Yeah, but she looks.
Greg Hartley
Sorry, she's using big illustrator illustrators. I said UG when you sent it to me. So.
Grant Stinchfield
So the big illustrators here, I mean, and I believe her. Like, I don't think she had ties to Epstein that she was running around with any of the craziness. But she's looking for a plane. I guess in the end it just shows you what a hypocrite she is. She'll take a. She'll take a plane for anybody. The big illustrators, though. I don't know if I normally see her talk like that.
Greg Hartley
No, I think she is punctuating what she's thinking and she knows she's got to be emphatic. But I think her. Unless she rehearsed the hell out of this, it is matching what she's saying. I think she is lazy sometimes with her illustrators. I agree with you. But here it matches what she's saying. The words, the cadence, everything seems to match. There's no blink rate increase, a little bit of brow up.
Grant Stinchfield
Otherwise, let's do Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, who had her best Kamala Harris moment where she just couldn't get the words out.
Sponsor/Announcer
If China were to move.
Greg Hartley
You know, I think that this is such a. You know, I think that this is a. This is, of course, a very long standing policy.
Jeffrey Degner
Painful.
Greg Hartley
So here's, here's when your brain is not working because of fight or flight and you're out over your skis. She's way out of her skis. Being here, first of all, and doing this. I actually said to one of your guys, if she had said, do you want some ice with that, I wouldn't have been surprised.
Grant Stinchfield
Anything that you see there that someone could take away, that if you don't know what you're talking about and you're in the boardroom and. And the boss asks you a question, are there anything here she's doing that we should avoid in our own everyday life?
Greg Hartley
Well, let me give you two pointers. One is just thinking that I told you to do. This will change your reaction to stress. Curl your toes in your shoes. It'll bring Your frontal lobe back online. Because what's happening is your frontal lobe is turning off from stress hormones. So your eyes get really wide and all that. The other thing that she is missing that Hillary and all these successful politicians have is a preamble, a way to lead in and give herself time to think. Well, you started off by talking about Bill. Traveling the world means nothing. She can say that in her sleep. So they develop these preambles that allow them time to think and to get their feedback on.
Grant Stinchfield
Interesting. You know, the best body language on there, Guys, go back to the very beginning of it. It's the, the very beginning. It's the, it's the person with the shoe up there in the back. She's flipping her shoe around. She was nervous for her, I think.
Greg Hartley
Yeah, well, nobody likes to watch a person drown. That's what this looks like.
Grant Stinchfield
No, they sure don't. Greg Hartley, it's great having you on the program. Thank you for coming on tonight.
Greg Hartley
Real pleasure. See you next week.
Grant Stinchfield
Absolutely. All right, Remember to check out Greg's website. Read body language.com and of course his YouTube show, the Behavior panel. The guys he, he partners with there do such a fabulous job. Check them out. All right. Two United States presidents now have confirmed the existence of aliens. At least that's how I read it. Next. Foreign. Welcome back, everyone. Earlier in the week, Barack Obama was talking about aliens and he was asked this. Are aliens real? They're real, but I haven't seen them. And, and they're not being kept in, what is it, Area 50?
Greg Hartley
Area 51? There's no underground facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy and they, they hid it
Grant Stinchfield
from the President of the United States. What was the first question you wanted answered when you became President? Where are the aliens? Where are the aliens? Now hold on. He said they're real. Well, he later backtracked on it and says, no, no, no, the universe is so vast. That's what I mean, the chances are they're real. He said they're real there. Well, President Trump took it the way I took it, that he just revealed that aliens are real. Barack Obama said that aliens are real. Have you seen any evidence of non human visitors to Earth? Well, he gave classified information. He's not supposed to be doing that. So aliens are real. Well, I don't know if they're real or not. I can tell you he gave classified information. He's not supposed to be doing, doing that. He made him, he made a big mistake. Hold on a second. So you're telling me, Mr. President, aliens are real. That when Barack Obama said aliens are real, he released classified information. So now we don't know what to think. And then President Trump releases his own statement after this, and it reads like this. I will be directing the Secretary of War and other relevant departments and agencies to begin the process of identifying and releasing government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomenon, UAPs, unidentified flying objects, UFOs, and any and all other information connected to these highly complex but extremely interesting and important matters. God bless America. Oh, man. Oh, man of Chevitz. I cannot wait for that release. Speaking of releases, have you seen this new video, Truth Bomb? Well, I pulled the end of it. It's out now. You can get it from RAV Music. And check this out. Truth Bomb. Say loud, say strong. Truth Bomb right now. True Bomb from the streets to the town. Truth Bomb, no leash. Truth Bomb, no fear, no crown. Truth bomb. Tick, tick, Truth Bomb. Count it down, count it down. Count it down. I'm telling you, Ben Berkwum is the best in that video. He really is. The whole crew putting that together did a fabulous job and that was fun on my part. I like being in it, too. So you can download that. Put the graphic back up where they can download it from the. From the QR code. There. There it is. So just pause me right now and then download it from that QR code. You're gonna love it. All right. Insane Leftists coordinated an interpretive dance in the honor of fallen anti ice agitators. They love the interpret dance, don't they? All right, welcome back. What is it with leftists, these Looney Tunes that they love the interpretive dance. Check this out. So I guess they're making a human car and they're going to enact the ice shooting or reenact the ice shooting in an interpretive dance fashion. All of it's pretty ridiculous. Look at it there. I mean, these people are awful. And quite frankly, do they have any responsibility? Just go get a job someplace. All right, Another off. I can't watch it anymore. Please. As we roll into the weekend, I can't take the leftist interpretive dancing. Turn it off. That's going to do it for us today. We got a great crew behind the glass. Big thanks to all of them, as always. And a huge thanks to all of you for watching Stitchfield's Army Rolls. You're the reason for that. And. And a big thanks to. To Rav and the whole. This is an Iheart podcast. Guaranteed human.
Host: Grant Stinchfield | Guests: Jeffrey Degner (Economist, American Institute for Economic Research), Dr. James Thorpe (Chief of Maternal & Prenatal Health, The Wellness Company), Greg Hartley (Body Language & Behavior Expert)
Main Theme:
This episode offers a fiery breakdown of the latest Supreme Court ruling striking down President Trump’s use of emergency tariff powers. Stinchfield analyzes the decision’s political and economic fallout, rails against what he frames as judicial betrayal, and debates tariff and inflation policy with an economist. The show also dives into immigration statistics, controversial legislation on firearms and 3D printing, skepticism about COVID vaccination, and closes with a lighter segment analyzing political figures’ body language—and a side of “alien disclosure” headlines. Throughout, the tone is combative and anti-establishment, focused on challenging mainstream narratives and advocating for conservative policy and values.
(Segment starts: 02:00)
Stinchfield’s Reaction:
“These three Supreme Court justices are traitors... I’m ashamed of certain members of the court, absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what’s right for our country.” — Grant Stinchfield (03:02)
Clarence Thomas Dissents:
"Congress authorized the President to regulate importation. Longstanding court cases have upheld it. Under that alone, this should have stood." — (06:22)
Guest Commentary:
“The Supreme Court, they’ve caused a nightmare here. They called it a mess themselves.” — Kevin O'Leary (08:40)
(Segment starts: 09:44)
Jobs & Manufacturing:
GDP & Government Spending:
Ongoing Debate:
Memorable Exchange:
Stinchfield: “Hold on a second. Gas prices are way down. Grocery prices are down since Joe Biden was here. We know that inflation is back under control…” (14:45)
Degner: “It’s cumulative… That’s what households experience. They continue to face price pressure at the grocery store... highest number of full time folks taking additional work since 2000.” (13:58)
(Segment starts: 15:21)
DHS Numbers & Migration:
“$6.2 billion was sent back… amounted to 37% of the Nicaraguan GDP.” (15:33)
Biden Policy Critique:
Law Enforcement Backlash:
“It is the biggest betrayal to law enforcement and public safety that I have ever seen.” — Maryland Sheriff (18:57)
(Segment starts: 21:33)
California & Colorado Legislation:
“Just possessing the files would make you a criminal… simply reading how to make a gun would be a crime. That is insanity, folks.” — Stinchfield (22:49)
First Amendment Implications:
Legal Prognosis:
(Segment starts: 28:44)
Vaccine Skepticism:
“80% of SIDS death… within two weeks of the vaccine… sparked the Georgia state legislature to commission a study.” (30:24)
Controversial Claims:
SIDS Data:
(Segment starts: 39:30)
(Segment starts: 48:00)
“I will be directing the Secretary of War… to begin the process of identifying and releasing government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life…” — President Trump’s official statement (48:45)
(Segment starts: 49:30)
| Segment Description | Start | |------------------------------------------------|--------| | Tariff Decision Supreme Court Breakdown | 02:00 | | Economic Debate: Jobs & Tariffs | 09:44 | | Immigration, Remittances, Law Enforcement | 15:21 | | Gun Laws, 3D Printing, First Amendment | 21:33 | | COVID Vaccines & SIDS Discussion | 28:44 | | Body Language & Behavior Analysis (Trump, etc) | 39:30 | | UFOs/Alien Disclosure Segment | 48:00 | | Music, Satire & Closing Bits | 49:30 |
Summary prepared for listeners who prefer a comprehensive, segment-by-segment walkthrough without needing to hear the full episode.