THE WAR ROOM WITH STEPHEN K. BANNON, FEBRUARY 16TH, 2026 (EP.#5145)

Summary

Real America’s Voice – THE WAR ROOM WITH STEPHEN K. BANNON

Episode #5145 | February 16, 2026

---

Episode Overview

This episode of "The War Room with Stephen K. Bannon" dives into the contentious debates surrounding election integrity, immigration, and the influence of foreign adversaries on U.S. elections. With the 2026 midterms on the horizon, Bannon and a panel of advocates, analysts, and "election whistleblowers" (Joe Hoft, Harry Hari, Cleta Mitchell, Garland Favorito) argue for tighter voting controls, scrutinize data irregularities from previous elections, and warn of systemic vulnerabilities they claim threaten American democracy. Throughout, the episode is laced with skepticism toward the current administration, mainstream narratives, and the federal justice system.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Voter ID Laws and Midterm Stakes

• [01:06] Cleta Mitchell highlights Trump's recent social media warning: “There will be voter ID for the midterm elections, whether approved by Congress or not.”
• The “Save America Act”—recently passed by the House—aims to tighten voting processes but faces criticism for potentially disenfranchising voters.
• Kristi Noem, DHS Secretary, claims measures are necessary due to destabilizing migration; emphasizes the need for "secure borders that don't torture and kill people."
• Bannon positions the coming midterms as "about power and who’s going to have it and who’s not." ([07:33], [11:16])

2. Immigration and ‘Civilizational’ Rhetoric

• [02:15] Bannon notes Marco Rubio’s comments in Europe about immigration being a “civilizational threat," but personally disagrees with such framing:

  “Immigration is not a civilizational threat to Europeans, to Canadians or Americans...”

• [03:15] Cleta Mitchell pushes back, expressing concern over large influxes turning communities into “third world derivatives”—a phrase Bannon acknowledges is often viewed as racially charged but frames as a concern over cultural assimilation.

  “When you import people … and they all gather in the same community, you turn those states, you turn those communities into, by the way, the countries … they left.” – Cleta Mitchell ([03:15])

• Bannon: “I’m not gonna call you racist. I don’t think that’s fair.” ([04:31])

3. The Tina Peters Case: Election Security, Prosecution, & Symbolism

• [05:18] An (unnamed) guest paints Colorado election official Tina Peters as a ‘prisoner of war’—asserting that the DOJ, acting with "malice," prosecuted her for defending election transparency and preserving records.

  “Tina Peters’ legacy will be the canary in the coal mine that was snuffed out... what it means to stand up and fight...”

• The panel sees her prosecution as a warning to others and a sign of federal overreach.

4. Election Data, Certification, and Alleged Fraud

• [11:16] Joe Hoft and Harry Hari (United for Freedom) outline their analysis of post-election record changes, especially in Colorado, arguing that numbers were manipulated after elections were certified:

  “We’re seeing now not only are they manipulating data before the elections and during the elections, but now after the elections.” – Joe Hoft

• [18:12] Garland Favorito likens these "out of period adjustments" to financial fraud, coining the term “vote laundering” and calling for law enforcement intervention instead of business as usual by officials:

  “In this case, it’s vote laundering … The conclusion is: we don’t know who’s voting. We don’t know whether the votes that they submitted were even counted…” – Garland Favorito ([22:03])

- Scale of Changes

> “In 2020, Colorado has 328,000+ changes to the voter history... this is enough to swing elections.” – Garland Favorito ([22:03])
> “If this was a financial audit under Sarbanes-Oxley … you would just fold up the books…” ([23:45])

- Where Did the Data Come From?

• Data is stated to be from official public records, not private data: “We got it from the state of Colorado. These are the official records…” – Garland Favorito ([25:08])

- Why Republicans are Silent

> “Because they put Tina Peters in jail. That’s why everybody’s afraid. We’re not afraid…” – Garland Favorito ([27:32])

5. Federal vs. State Jurisdiction & Foreign Interference

• [30:00] Cleta Mitchell defends Tulsi Gabbard’s actions as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) investigating alleged foreign interference in elections—citing Iranian access to voting databases.

  “At that point, it is then the responsibility of Kristi Noem as the Secretary of Homeland Security to then come in and… mitigate against that threat...” – Cleta Mitchell

6. Probable Cause & Ballot Security: Georgia and National Ramifications

• [38:17] Harry Hari and Garland Favorito detail the supposed "probable cause" for FBI search warrants to seize ballots and machines in Georgia, describing discrepancies in ballot counts, double scanning, and counterfeit ballots—all as part of evidence presented to support legal action.
• Bannon positions these efforts as the "railhead" for contesting the 2020 results and the foundation for future election reform.

7. The Broader Battle: Democrat Strategy and Legal Maneuvering

• [44:41] Bannon and Mitchell warn that Democrats, through tactics like redistricting and expedited court procedures, are seeking to lock Republicans out of majority power unless these underlying election system issues are addressed.

  “The best way and the clearest path to do that is to show you all the cheating that went on to steal this from President Trump in 2020.” – Bannon ([44:41])

• Bannon and guests express skepticism and even distrust toward DOJ and FBI readiness or willingness to acknowledge “the scale and complexity” of alleged fraud.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• Bannon (07:33): “This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people… Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.”
• Cleta Mitchell (03:15): “Do I want the whole world legally immigrating here? No… My point is we have too much. It’s making American culture into a third world derivative of itself and it’s hurting the wages of American workers.”
• Garland Favorito (22:03): “The conclusion is we don’t know who’s voting. We don’t know whether the votes that they submitted were even counted in all truthfulness.”
• Garland Favorito (27:32): “Because they put Tina Peters in jail. That’s why everybody’s afraid. We’re not afraid. I mean, you call me a wingnut, but I’m crazy for my country.”
• Joe Hoft (11:16): “Our elections are not certifiable. We wouldn’t accept this in the real world, which I call the corporate world. Nothing in these processes seems to be controlled.”
• Cleta Mitchell (46:31): “What they’re trying to do … is a trial. And I hope that that is at the level of DOJ and others understand. They want to do a quick trial … and basically take the ballots back and take the tabulars back.”

---

Detailed Segment Timestamps

• 00:00–01:06 – Introduction & Ad
• 01:06–03:08 – Trump’s voter ID ultimatum; Save America Act; Kristi Noem on migration
• 03:08–05:17 – Bannon, Mitchell, and Favorito debate assimilation, ‘third world’ rhetoric
• 05:18–07:33 – Tina Peters case; DOJ involvement; “prisoner of war” language
• 07:33–11:16 – Stakes of the midterms; focus on Virginia; behind-the-scenes strategy
• 11:16–14:17 – Joe Hoft & Harry Hari on Colorado data manipulation
• 14:17–15:37 – Bannon queries on election certification norms
• 17:06–22:03 – Hari/Harry & Favorito on scale and nature of voter record changes
• 22:03–28:07 – “Vote laundering” analogy; fear among officials after Tina Peters prosecution
• 30:00–32:10 – Cleta Mitchell on Tulsi Gabbard, foreign interference, and federal/state roles
• 38:17–41:29 – Georgia probable cause for ballot seizures; breakdown of identified irregularities
• 44:41–47:58 – The legal chess game: evidence hearings, redistricting, trial implications
• 48:26–50:32 – Connection of foreign adversaries (China/Iran) to election infrastructure vulnerabilities

---

Episode Tone & Style

• Language: Direct, combative, with an “us versus them” mentality. Frequent use of analogies (“vote laundering,” “prisoner of war”).
• Tone: Urgent, alarmist, and skeptical of establishment actors and the administrative state.
• Speaker Style: Heavy on monologues, with intense, sometimes conspiratorial questioning of official narratives.

---

Summary for Non-Listeners

This episode is a fiery, orchestrated call to action for the War Room audience. Bannon and his guests argue that American elections remain systemically compromised, referencing supposed data evidence, legal maneuvers, and high-profile prosecutions like Tina Peters as proof. They invoke foreign interference (naming China and Iran), criticize both Democratic and Republican officials for inaction, and urge tighter control on both elections and borders. Throughout, the discussion weaves together legal arguments, technical analysis, and emotive rhetoric, painting the battle for 2026—and for "the soul of American democracy"—as fast-approaching and existential.

---

Note: Ads and product plugs have been omitted from this summary per instructions.

Transcript

[Stephen K. Bannon]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Guaranteed Human support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures [e-mail] Trump just said on.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Social media quote there will be voter ID for the midterm elections, whether approved by Congress or not. That stark warning comes just days after the House passed the restrictive Save America act, which, if it passes the Senate, would make it harder for millions of Americans to vote. Just hours before that post, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said this we've been proactive to make sure that we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders to lead this country. Migration has been a huge flashpoint. More people were deported under my husband and Barack Obama without killing American citizens and without putting children into detention camps than were in the first Trump term or this first year of Trump's second term. There is a legitimate reason to have a debate about things like migration. It went too far. It's been disruptive and destabilizing and it needs to be fixed in a humane way, with secure borders that don't torture and kill people.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

What Marco Rubio went to Europe and said is telling Europeans to fear immigration, that it is a civilizational threat. It may be a lot of things I think we can all agree. And Marco Rubio said, you should control the door to your country and you should decide who comes in and who comes. That's not in dispute, but it's civil. Immigration is not a civilizational threat to Europeans, to Canadians or Americans well, speaking.

[Cleta Mitchell]

As a Canadian, I know that immigration has built Canada, has made Canada, and, you know, you're exactly right. Absolutely. Countries need to control their own borders. That's one of the things that citizens quite rightly insist on. One of the reasons for the success of Canada's immigration policy has been we've always been clear to Canadians. We decide who comes, we decide who doesn't. And we've also been clear that immigration made. That's been the case in the past. I'm sure it's going to be the case in the future.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

So are you okay with people who are coming here and are paying taxes and are contributing to the country? Are you okay with that? Are you okay with legal immigration in that matter?

[Cleta Mitchell]

That's such a vague question. Do I want the whole world legally immigrating here? No, not the whole world. That's not what I'd ask. Do I want, you know, enough where it's a net boon to the economy? Sure. But to ask me if I support that, I think is sort of a vague and superfluous and really not getting anywhere questioned because the debate is about how many people we should have. And my point is we have too much. It's making American culture into a third world derivative of itself and it's hurting the wages of American workers. Yeah. When people say the third world derivative of itself is racist, like, how do you, how do you, what do you mean by that when you say third world derivative? I don't want to live in Somalia, I want to live in America. And when you import people in so such a high rate of number of people and they all gather in the same community, you turn those states, you turn those communities and to, by the way, the countries, the war torn countries, in some cases I can't even call them a country because they're a failed state that they left and they shouldn't be importing those policies. I want to live in America. The beauty of America is that we can all come together. But if we're lying about what coming together looks like, then I can't sit here and say I want to live in Somalia and say that Somalia is the same as America, because it's not. Or these people wouldn't be fleeing Somalia and going to Minnesota. And maybe that's an uncomfortable or racist thing to say. It's not. It's true.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

I'm not gonna call you racist. I don't think that's fair.

[Garland Favorito]

That's not what I'm going for.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

But I just think that the idea, your depiction of not only Minneapolis, but parts of the United States is nearing.

[Garland Favorito]

A third world country.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

It feels like the natural conclusion of that is an immigration policy that restricts people from certain countries that are gonna turn our country into a quote unquote, third world country.

[Cleta Mitchell]

I think you are arguing for a restrictionist position at least for, I mean, that's not a surprise, right? At least for an intermediary period. Because you think for too long we, too many people come in and there hasn't been assimilation, which is fair characterization. I think it's the choice of words that triggers people and makes it sound like you're saying we don't want black people or, I mean, it just resonates and triggers.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

I know.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, I don't want to live, put it this way, I want to live in a country not a failed state.

[Unknown Speaker (possibly a guest discussing Tina Peters)]

They can do this to Tina Peters. They can do this to every single one of you. The precedent that has stood from the moment Judge Matthew Barrett sentenced her through all this appeal process and her habeas is that you can be imprisoned and denied bail, jail for first time offenses for your political speech and treated like an absolute prisoner of war. She is a prisoner of war. And everyone needs to remember this came down from doj. This was a RICO operation in my words, with doj, with, I'm sorry, the Secretary of State of Colorado in Dominion. That's why she became such a target starting in 2018. But the corrupt DOJ under Merrick Garland was involved in this prosecution and this travesty going back to 2021, at least that we have on record. And Tina Peters, even now her cry, her war cry from prison is please, President Trump, we need to get rid of this, of these machines because it's shown in the MESA reports. This is why Jenna Griswold doesn't want her let out and has urged no one to offer her any, any solace. Any ability to be released as she should be is because they're afraid she know that Tina preserved evidence. And Tina's message to President Trump is thank you, thank you for fighting. Please, we need to get rid of these machines because we have very little time before the midterms. And I'll just ask you all to remember this is a gold star mother, a 70 year old who is being tortured psychologically and been denied justice in a show trial. A mistrial. And you are next. If this continues to stand, if we do not actually have real elections, Tina Peters legacy will be the canary in the coal mine that was snuffed out instead of the symbol that she has already been made of what it means to stand up and to fight, no matter the consequence for the republic and for all of you. So just please go to tinapeters us for her show, for her legal defense fund. Make sure you follow her on social media. But Tina Peters is the symbol that they made her out to be. It wasn't the 2020 election, it was the municipal election. Because her own constituents told her, pay attention to this, please, Tina. And then she preserved records.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. I got a free shot. All these networks lying about the people. The people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to. But it's going to happen. And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA Media I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. War Room here's your host, Stephen K. Band. Foreign. It's Monday the 16th of February in the year of our Lord 2026. It's President's Day. We're going to have the historian Larry Sweichart on later in this show to talk about President's Day, particularly Washington, Lincoln and Trump. I want to put up this whole thing is about power and about who's going to have it and who's not. The midterm elections are coming up. Of course, they're maniacally focused on turfing out President Trump with an impeachment. And you can tell this by everything they're focusing on and coming to Christian Heinz, I think it is. Put up a map. Over the weekend, a lot of people have been talking about this, about what's going to happen in Virginia. 21 April is his referendum of the state by Sponberger. And Andrew Colvett had a great, you know, had a great tweet he put up that said, hey, you can see with Newsom and Clinton, particularly Clinton, we headed up there. She's softening on migration. So is Newsom. That what they're trying to do is a Spamberger. Can I get that map back up? I just want people to see it. Thanks. That they're softening this and Spamberger. And this is Spamberger. This is what the map would look like if Spamberger you can see Virginia, the commonwealth, Virginia up there. This map represents a 230, I believe Democratic majority in the House. That is what they're targeted on. I've talked to a lot of people behind the scenes over the weekend on the math and this is not people don't believe this, but this where it could be headed. So the point is Georgia, Colorado, Arizona, it is more important than ever to get to the bottom of the 2020 election and to get people fired up hey, the 2020 election was stolen and they're trying to steal this one. Unless we get voter id, unless we get the very basics out of the Save America act, which looks like the Senate went to the Munich conference, left town and now they're on a one week recess. They're not back. They have no incentive, no priority to do this. Let's bring in, I want to bring in Joe Hoft. Joe is the twin brother of Jim Hoft over at the Gateway Pundit. Amazing article up this week. Plus Harry Hari from United for Freedom. Joe, thank you very much. That piece was amazing. Talk to me about the piece. I want to bring in Hari for the details. This is about Colorado. It's really about Tina Peters. We did the special over the weekend, went on fire about Tina Peters. 500 days in prison. This is the 501st day. So Joe, walk me through what Hari is with United for Freedom. He's been one of these data guys has been all over this. Walk me through what this article says about Colorado, about where we stand on actually getting to the bottom of voter fraud.

[Joe Hoft]

Yeah, thanks Steve, thanks for having me and really thanks to Harry for sharing this with me. We put it up over the weekend at both Joehoff.com and Gateway Pundit and it received some, some attention. I appreciate you bringing us here today to talk more about it. The issue that Harry raises is that not only have we had all this other aisles mountains of evidence that shows of election fraud in the 2020 election and really moving forward he and his team put together some analysis where they've looked at the numbers from those elections going back to 2020 and he's seen that the records are changing after the fact, after the, after the elections are certified, then they're changing records after that and I'll let Harry talk more about that. But you know, my background's in audit and finance and I oversaw billion dollar, multibillion dollar entities overseas in both those functions and I seen anything like our election process. This is the key to me and Harry now just adds more weight to this entire position, which is our elections, are not certifiable. We wouldn't accept this. In the real world, which I call the corporate world, nothing in these processes seems to be controlled. I've written three books about it. As you know, you've had me on each time I broke one of these books. But as I'm looking at the 2020 election, every area that I looked in was not certifiable from a corporate perspective with, with real auditors and, and people that are independent, objective and professional. What we have going on right now is a facade. It's a joke. We Learned it in 2020 like never before. And it's still in place. And we're seeing now not only are they manipulating data before the elections and during the elections, but now after the elections. And I gotta tell you, in the corporate world, you don't mess with prior period numbers. They are locked down. You can't do anything to them. If you're going to make any adjustments related to prior periods, they're going to hit this year's books with some sort of adjusting entry, ultimately probably hitting retained earnings or some account like that. This is outrageous what's going on. It's just another layer of the massive corruption that's taken place in this country. And then as Harry points out too, and I'm sure he will hear in a minute, it's about Colorado, this piece, he starts with the state of Colorado because he wants to help Tina Peters like we all do. Those elections there are corrupt. There were people telling Tina to do things that were wrong. And Tina found that the numbers were changing back then. This entire piece by Harry supports exactly what Tina found and supports again her innocence. The wrong people are in prison in Colorado. It's never should have been Tina Peters. She's an innocent woman who did her job for both the federal, state level and Harry's evidence now even supports that further. It's shocking what we found. It's great. Adds great support to her entire case. And I'll pass it on to Harry.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Now we're going to go to break. Question. When you say certifiable, what's your definition of certifiable? Because I think this is something that gets lost in the conversation.

[Joe Hoft]

Well, in the corporate world, we make sure that all controls are in place. We have to check controls and numbers and the processes that are surround those controls. So we have this thing called Sarbanes Oxley, which came in in the early 2000s that mandates every corporation have not just their numbers perfect, they have to be perfect. But the processes supporting those numbers must be perfect too. So every activity that leads to a financial result has to be reviewed to make sure there's no way of inserting information or taking information out or manipulating information. This is all tested. Systems are a big part of it. We're not going to allow systems that are not secure like we found in Georgia in 2020. That's all you got to say is the systems aren't are secure and they're done. They're removed. You don't touch them anymore until they're fixed. This is the real world, the corporate world. We don't adhere to these same practices in our elections. As you know.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

It's we have to night and day. We have to jump real quickly. We got about 15 seconds. Are those processes in Colorado where they've been in? Have they been in Colorado?

[Joe Hoft]

No, not at all. No. I would say nowhere that we look at in the 2020 election. Nowhere.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Joe Hopps stick around. Harry Harvey is going to be here. We got Cleta Mitchell. We're gonna have Garland Favorito. They're coming hard for Tulsi Gabbard and DNI over what? Georgia. They are absolutely freaked out that the key to the 2020 election lays there. Short break. Back in a moment.

[Public Ad Announcer]

Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S P500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comdisclosures War Room.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Here'S your host, Stephen K. Ban. Okay, now you see what this fight is over in Georgia and in Maricopa County. I want to go to Harry Hari United for Freedom. Harry, the story you put out, I want you to take a minute and walk through the data and what it shows us, because a lot of people on the left are just gonna come in and say, hey, this is more of the same wingnuts that were arguing this back in 2020. Nothing happened there. They got thrown out of court. This never got any traction. And they're coming back again because they're worried about the midterm elections. And now that they've got Tulsi, Gabbard, DNI and other people in the intelligence community that are interested in this and looking at this besides the FBI, this is the only reason they're resurfacing this. And they're doing it. They're starting with the Tina Peters of it all because they want to make a case that that should be federalized. She should be out. She should. The DOJ and Bureau prison should go out and really take her to a federal prison and let her go. And you're trying to make the case for that. So tell me what is actually going on.

[Garland Favorito]

What's actually going on is our election system is broken beyond any kind of systematic recognition at all. Getting back to Joe's earlier comment, if you found these out of period adjustments that were hidden in a regular corporate audit, the next persons that you would call would be police officials or the IRS to complain about the bar on the corner that's doing money laundering. In this case, it's boat laundering. When we do this analysis, we use the data from the states. We don't start with our own data. We do simple queries, actually, sometimes very complex queries. But we look at whether they comply with the voter registration rules, whether they comply with disallowing people that violate the voter registration rules from voting, whether or not they have real counts that agree with their count of voters. And then now what we've done is a horizontal analysis is the best way to describe it. We've made period to period comparison of the people that are shown to having voted as having voted in particular elections in 2020 in Colorado, there's over 328,000 changes to the record of who voted from the period of December 1st of 2022 to December 22nd of 20. These are called out of period adjustments, if you were looking at it from a financial perspective, but they're completely disallowed. This is tampering with the federal record. You know, what is the reason that they're washing these old votes out? It's specifically either to hide tremendous malfeasance or some sort of nefarious, difficult to explain error in the systems, or more likely in all frankness, because of the fact that they're hiding it, is that there's actual malice involved, that this is election fraud. And you know, getting back to your comment about, you know, certification, the federal definition of certification is that something is accurate or compliant. The supreme court decides in 1888, under Coy in 1888 that the duty of the election officials is to be obedient to the law. It doesn't matter if you're guilty of malice, if you're just ignorant or stupidly and sickeningly apathetic about running a fair election. Our data is the state's data. It's not our data. It is our analysis. We've gone through it, we figured it out. We bought the computers, we've bought time on data centers to be able to hold this data and to analyze it in depth. I'm an actual SME under the federal government definition of SME, but I'm also a certified SME with regard to election law. I helped write hava. Actually, I shouldn't say. I don't want to overblow that. I mean, I was an advisor to John Ashcroft and some other people that were former election officials in St. Louis. But I know election law. I know cyber forensic auditing. I'm not a financial auditor like Joe is.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on for a second. SME audience is subject matter expert. So that means you're certified in this area, you're a certified guy, and you come at this with certification. And so you know what you're doing, correct?

[Garland Favorito]

That is correct. And so do the hundred data analysts that I have working with me.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

You have 100 data analysts on this right now?

[Garland Favorito]

Yes, we do. We have 35 states that we've done this analysis for.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

And what is the conclusion of you and the hundred data analyst?

[Garland Favorito]

The conclusion is we don't know who's voting. We don't know whether the votes that they submitted were even counted in all truthfulness. And the problem is much worse where you have, you know, open voting with mail in ballots, and we don't have any indication at all that the vote counts are actually accurate. They do everything they can. And you'll be talking to Garland, who is a close friend of mine. I've helped him on a lot of things. The fact of the matter is that they can't certify. You know, legally they can't certify because they don't know if the system is accurate. And as a matter of fact, we have proof. Proof that the system is grossly inaccurate. And now we have proof that they seem to be trying to make things disappear two years after the election was counted. So we see in 2020, Colorado has 328,000 plus changes to the voter history. In 2022, it's 155,000, almost 156,000. This is enough to swing elections easily. And the affirmative duty is on the place of the election officials. We call it mia. The election officials are mia. It doesn't matter whether it's malice, ignorance, or apathy. The fact of the matter is, under the definition of law in 1888, it's election fraud. There's a complete bastardization of the word fraud because we talk about bank fraud and contract fraud. Election fraud is something completely different. It was designed from the 1800s to prove obedience to the law, and we can't prove it. Joe would say they clearly, if this was a financial audit under Sarbanes, Oxley or sox, as it's called, you would just fold up the books and say, we can't render an opinion about whether this was accurate because there's so many errors and so many problems with this data. It just needs to be thrown out. They should have thrown out the election in 2020. They should have thrown out the election in 2022. And the fact of the matter is 2024 is a problem. Now, that doesn't mean that, you know, President Trump wasn't elected. It doesn anything other than our election officials are unlawfully and in an untrustworthy manner running our elections. And this has to stop. I mean, the American public has a right to trustworthy elections. It's the law. It's not, you know, labeled as some sort of, you know, decision that Jenna Griswold gets to make in Colorado as to whether or not we're going to do the law today or are we going to do it the way she wants to do?

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on a second. Where did you get this data? Comes from where? Because you're going to be criticized. I can just tell you right now, people are going to be jumping all over you on this. We're going to go back to the. We're wearing tinfoil hats. Where did this data come from that you and your hundred data analysts, as you, as a subject, certified subject matter expert, went through? Where did you actually get it from in Colorado?

[Garland Favorito]

We got it from the state of Colorado. These are the official records of the state of Colorado that we analyzed over time. They Just simply don't know that they have this problem. Actually, it's not true. They seem to know that they have the problem in 2024 because this particular data would show that these types of changes are not occurring at scale any longer.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on.

[Garland Favorito]

But remember, it's 2020 and 2022. That puts Tina in.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

When you say you've gotten this, this is all on public record.

[Garland Favorito]

Absolutely. And people criticize us. We have many articles written about United for Freedom that suggests that we aren't transparent. We've given this data to the DOJ under the Biden administration. It went to Merrick Garland directly, and it's proof of criminal activity within the election systems. It's, it's not, you know, it's not something that is, you know, privileged as to whether or not they get to obey the law. Obedience to the law is required for elections so that we can trust them. And the fact of the matter is, in the noise that they've created and the chaos of the elections, who knows what's going on? You know, the good example as a military officer in your past is chaff, right? You've introduced noise. So you can't see the signal. They're trying to disguise the signal with noise is, you know, are all of these hundreds of thousands of changes, you know, intentful cheating. Doesn't have to be. It only has to be a small piece of the signal. You can't.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

If you're getting, if you're getting, if you're getting, if you're getting this from public data. It's not just the Secretary of State, who's obviously a hard Griswold, wants to keep Tina Peters in prison for the simple reason she can't come. This is her 501st day. She can't come out and talk about it. Like you have Garland Favorito or Cleta Mitchell, people that can come out every day and talk about what's going on here, they want her suppressed. So we got about a minute in this block, and then I'm going to keep you guys around and bring in Garland and Cleta. But, but if it's public data, there are a lot of counties in that state that are Republican. Why is no one stepping up on your data and saying, yeah, this is a problem, and they're cleaning this up after the fact. Why has it been silent except you guys coming out, why has it been silence?

[Garland Favorito]

Because they put Tina Peters in jail. That's why everybody's afraid. We're not afraid. I mean, you call me a wingnut, but I'm crazy for my country. I'm crazy for what I'm bequeathing to my children and my grandchildren. And this is the only thing I care about. A constitution guarantees that. Our Constitution guarantees the election of our own representatives. And this system doesn't guarantee anything. And that said, as a actual cyber forensic expert, it's not an imagination.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

30 seconds and I'm going to hold you. Do you think that your evidence, your data is enough to make this a federal offense, that Tina Peters, they can then intercede with Tina as a witness in a federal crime?

[Garland Favorito]

Well, certainly it's a federal crime conducted by officials across the state of California that they've certified this election.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

California, we're talking, hang on. We're talking about Colorado. We're not talking about California.

[Garland Favorito]

Right. I'm sorry, I've missed spoke. In Colorado, there's crimes that have been committed by officials and Tina Peters, under the federal premise rules, should not have been convicted of this. She was trying to.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hold, hang on one second. I'll hold you through the break. Harry Hari Joe Hoff, Cleta Mitchell and Garland Favorito. We're gonna go to Georgia. Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. Okay, there's a, there's a piece in the, there's a piece on the Hill this morning about Tulsi Gabbard. And you can tell how worried they are. They're petrified about this situation down in Georgia. And it ties a lot to what Harry Hari's talking about. I've got Garland, Favorita and Cleta Mitchell. Cleta, first, you've been warning that this, they're desperate to get back the ballots and the tapes and everything. And this thing that's happening in a couple of weeks is not just some hearing. They're getting ready to go to trial. And I think hopefully everybody at DOJ and the FBI understand this. Walk me through. And you can see they're targeting Tulsi Gabbard right now to try to back her off this case and DNR off this case. Where do we stand with this?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, Tulsi Gabbard, as the Director of National Intelligence, has a responsibility to identify whether there are foreign adversaries interfering in the United States and our processes in our government, et cetera. And that's what she's been doing. And she was present at the president's request, as I understand it, in Fulton county during the FBI's raid to seize all the election materials that Fulton county has been hiding for five years. And that is perfectly appropriate for her to be involved in that, to be able to understand whether or not, and she's been investigating. I'm anxious for her to please issue her report. At which point, once, Tulsi Gabbard says, and she has said twice publicly now, and I think that this report, if it ever gets published, will go into more detail about the threat to our election infrastructure by our foreign adversaries. And we know that Iran has already, we know for a fact that it has accessed illegally some of our state's voter registration databases. At that point, it is then the responsibility of Kristi Noem as the Secretary of Homeland Security to then come in and help to mitigate and establish procedures and protocols to mitigate against that threat and all of those threats. So this is, this is all perfectly within the responsibilities of Tulsi Gabbard as the Director of National Intelligence and then of Kristi Noem as the Secretary of Homeland Security. Now, the Democrats, if you go back to 2019, you had Ron Wyden on the floor of the US Senate giving a speech about how Republicans were not taking seriously the threats to our voting systems by foreign actors. And I think he was right about that. They introduced a bill. Actually, that bill should be reintroduced with bipartisan support. The fact of the matter is we know that there have been foreign adversaries trying to interfere with our elections. And now we need to do something about it.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

First off, you have the grand jury, I think, in California with the Chinese guy. I'll get that from Harry Harper. Remember, grand jury, I think had an indictment of him in Michigan and in California, and that just gone to ground. So hang on for a second. I want to get Garland. I want to go through because they're criticizing the actual war in itself. They're saying Kurt Olson just rehashed all the wingnuts material from 2020 in this. I'm going to go in a second, but I want to bring in Michael Kunstler's with us. Michael, I want to get you in here early because the sale that you have put forward is on fire. I've talked to people all weekend. They absolutely love. Just give us a second. Give us a minute on all family pharmacy. What is the concept instead? Because people focus on Big Pharma with Bobby Kennedy. He's out today talking about ultra processed food and everything HHS is doing. But your theory, the case is you're not going to have medical freedom just by going after Big Pharma. You have to go after the distribution system. If you want medical freedom, you have to have the ability to talk to physicians that can actually prescribe things for you that you can get from a pharmacy. Walk me through the basic concept of all family pharmacy.

[Michael Kunstler]

Yeah, the concept, like you said, is to go around big pharma purchasing cheap generic drugs at a very good cost, price transparency as well. So you can come right to our website, fill out the medical forms for our physician, have a conversation with them about what's best for you. You could also talk to our pharmacist to see what's best to have on hand for flu season. You know, we're coming into allergy and travel season with spring break right around the corner, Easter holiday. So this is a great time to stock up on certain medications that you feel are necessary for you and your family. That's what we do here at all family pharmacies. We allow you to stock up on meds for when you need them the most. And this is the perfect time with 47% off. You know, today's President's Day, so it's a great sale. You save a lot of money and it's quite busy, so, you know, get your orders in when you're ready.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

So. And you're doing this in honor of President trump. That's the 47 is not just a random number.

[Michael Kunstler]

Yeah, 47 is for President Trump. We like the way America is going right now. We love medical freedom. We love the freedom that all Americans have here. We're trying to, you know, push our outreach to all Americans, you know, let them try our services, because it's. It's very easy and convenient, and based on how the healthcare system is, it's twisted backwards. They make things difficult for people.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

So I want to make sure people know this. You've got both pharmacists and physicians on staff. They come to you. They either call the number or go the website. You put them in contact with professionals, they talk it through, and then they write the orders and then you send it to folks. Just walk me through the process. I want to make sure everybody understands. You're going to talk to a pharmacist or a physician or a qualified certified medical assistant.

[Michael Kunstler]

Yes. So the process is pretty simple. You can give us a call if you need assistance. We love chatting. You go on our website, fill out the medical forms, pick the medication that you feel is necessary for you. We're going to send that order to a physician for them to prescribe it. Now, they're not going to prescribe every order. They do have to look at the medical guidance of what your health profile looks like based on, you know, safety and effectiveness. They're going to prescribe it, we're going to ship it out to you. You know, we do have to collect allergies, medication and food allergies to make sure, you know, we don't have any reactions. But everything goes to a licensed medical professional, whether it goes through our physicians and then it comes to us and it goes through our pharmacist. So we are double checking everything and making sure the medication is not going to hurt you. It's only going to help you once we process your order, we ship it out FedEx today or we have overnight delivery.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Michael, one more time, where do people go? Because I think the response so far has been overwhelming because you guys said, hey, look, we'll give you 47% off on certain products and medication to get you to come and try us. I think people are quite open to that. So where do they go today? What's the number they call or where do they go on the website?

[Michael Kunstler]

Phone number is 561-717-6794. Or you go to allfamilypharmacy.com backslash bannon. No coupon codes. We've already adjusted the website for the pricing, so everybody gets it.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Michael, thank you very much. Appreciate you doing this over President's Weekend and Honor President Trump. 47% off. It's pretty amazing. Thank you so much, sir. Appreciate you. And all family pharmacists, allfamilypharmacy.com, promo code. Bannon go there today, 47% off in honor of President's Day weekend and President Trump. Okay, I'm gonna bring Garland Favorito in. Cause here's what they're gonna say. They're gonna say this whole big push now to get to the 2020, we say that's the railhead. You've got the same collection of wingnuts. You've got the Hoff brothers over at Gateway Pundit, you got Harry Hari, the data analyst, You've got the great Cleta Mitchell, and you've got Garland Favorita and a host of others down in Georgia. So. And Kurt Olson in the White House. And you got the war room. You got all these other people are pushing what they call the big lie. I think that's even in our cold open. So Garland Favorito, they've gone through, I guess, the application for the warrant or the subpoena, and a lot of it. Kurt, I think Olson, obviously, he works as a special assistant to the president over at the White House compound is a key part of this. Walk me through that, cuz. Now they're saying this thing's totally phony and this is what they're going to use to go to trial to try to get the evidence back. They got to get their hands, hands on the ballots. They got to get their hands on the tapes in the machines in Fulton County. If they can't do that, we're going to see that President Trump definitely was the winner of the. Well, let's say this. Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election could not be certified. It began, kicked to the House of Representatives and President Trump would have won on a vote in the House in a contingent election. Garland, favorito the actual. What is it, the warrant, the subpoena? What did Kurt Olson draft up that they're saying is all wingnut ism?

[Harry Hari]

Well, thank you, Steve. I'm so glad you asked me that question because that Hill article, Tulsi and Kurt, that's a diversion. The only real question here is what was the probable cause that the FBI had to conduct the search warrant? And there were five elements of probable cause. The first one was the vote count discrepancies. And I think, as Harry McDougal explained last week on your show, that the vote count discrepancies that were found were confirmed by Governor Kemp's own study and you mentioned this and he actually sent a letter, as you mentioned on your show last week, over to the Secretary of State election board, excuse me, to investigate the vote count discrepancies that we had originally found in the audit and Joe Rossi had taken, taken all the way forward to through to the governor's office. Specifically, what Joe and the team found was 6691 double reported ballots in the audit, in addition to another 3466 vote difference between the audit and the original count. And then you top all that off with 4880 the vote difference between the machinery count and the original count. They kept telling us that all of the counts added up. There's no way not one count matched another count. It was all a facade. Now that's, that's the governor's own report. So that's not a debunked conspiracy theory. That's just the first one, Steve. The second one, that was the double scan ballots. 3930 ballots were not just double scan, they were double counted. We know that because all the cast vote records, with the possible exception of 128 were certified votes. So that was proven in a state election board hearing campaign with expert witness testimony from Philip Davis, a 30 year career image analyst and also thanks to David Cross and Philip have done a lot of work on that. The third element of the probable cause was the counterfeit balance. Caroline Jeffords and I were there the day November 14th of 2020 when Susie Voltage Polls found the counterfeit ballots and her team. They actually ended up with six sworn affidavits, four senior poll managers and two audit monitors all signing sworn affidavits that they saw counterfeit ballots in the hand count audit in addition to the discrepancies. We knew that these were counterfeit and I was there as well that we knew that they were counterfeit because they were mail in ballots. They were not, not folded from being.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on. We got all this information and they got in the ballots. Why are they saying Kurt Olson's draft of the affidavit that led to the to actually go seizing it to the warrant application. We got about 60 seconds. Why they say that's all wingnudism?

[Harry Hari]

Well, they're trying to divert the attention from fact attacks to people Kurt and Tulsi really are. They are involved maybe, but they are just not relevant. The issue is the probable cause. So they have created this diversion to attack the messenger and hopes that their people who they are trying to propagate to are so stupid they don't understand enough facts and are going to listen to them. I don't think think that's going to hold up. Most people have enough brains to not to look at a few facts other than just shooting messages.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

We got to go to break real quick. Yes or no, Is there enough probable cause to go seize the ballots and the tapes and the machines?

[Harry Hari]

Sir, there's, there's 100 times more probable cause than what they needed, I would think.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on, hang on. We're going to take a short commercial break. Take your phone phone out. Text Bannon at 989-898. You get the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump. You also get access to Philip Patri and team at Birch Gold. And if you make a qualifying purchase you get a hard copy. The Patriots edition of the End of the Dollar Empire. Back in a moment. Here's your host, Stephen K. Banff. Okay, CNBC has an article. It's behind the paywall for their professionals. You pay a professional thing there. We're going to try to break it out. Make sure you can read it this afternoon. But it talks about it connects national debt, artificial intelligence and the dollar as a safe haven, which it has been. We've argued the reason We've argued that you see the deterioration on the Biden years, the 25 to 26% devaluation or lack of purchasing price of the dollars because the massive federal spending. They're making the same case I've been arguing. We're going to have some AI guys on here in the second hour to talk about this tectonic plate shifts that's taking place in artificial intelligence over the last 10 days. Our nation's business model right now is a highly leveraged bet on artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence transforming the economy, economy full stop. If you don't understand that, you're not understanding where the world's going. And we're going to drill down into that. This is why I think now more than ever go to Birchgold, end of the dollar empire. Understand it. We're coming out with an eighth free installment. If you make a qualifying purchase over at Birchgold promo code Bannon, you can get a free copy on the Patriots edition of the first seven installments we put into book form. But most importantly, to talk to Philip Patrick and the team like today day, make sure you make contact with them. Gold's around 5,000 bucks. Not the price, it's the process. And what we've told you about the economy has come through over the last five years, six years. I think we've nailed this. And I think cnbc, their analysts and I think it's a Deutsche bank analyst they walk through about is the dollar a safe haven anymore? You have to ask that question because we are the prime reserve currency. Cleta Mitt, here's why. If you can get that map up of the red map again, here's the game they're playing. They're going all in on this redistricting. This map is after Spanberger on 21 April. If that referendum passes in the state of and the Commonwealth of Virginia judges don't stay in the middle, you're going to have a 10 to 1 in the Commonwealth of Virginia. And what this is projecting is 230. Now we'll tell you, for many people I've talked to, they don't agree with this. But this is what they think the House could look like and that's why they're trying to moderate their pitch like Spamberger did when she ran. But she was a radical after she got in and what she's doing here is a radical. This is why we've got to get to the voter id, all the voter issues. The best way and the clearest path to do that is to show you all the cheating that went on to steal this from President Trump in 2020. And the evidence is there and we've been on this from day one. And we're not gonna stop. Cleta Mitchell, this is my concern, this judge's order, and I don't know who's focused on this. The judge's order is not just let's have some hearing on probable cause. And did they have probable cause. And you had Garland Favorito and his five points, all that this is a trial. And I hope that that is at the level of DOJ and others understand. They want to do a quick trial with Abbey Lowell. Right. And Norm Ison and other heavy hitters and basically take the ballots back and take the tabulars back. Now, am I wrong in that that's.

[Cleta Mitchell]

What they're trying to do? And it's very unusual, this probable cause hearing. The judge issued this order last Tuesday, Wednesday, and it is a, he said it's an evidentiary hearing and the parties are supposed to put on witnesses. They're supposed to decide on what exhibits and documents to be introduced. And so what I'm concerned about is just making sure that all of the data and the information and the things that we have learned and documented over the last five years with people like Garland and Kevin Monkla and Harry McDougal and David Schaefer and on and on, people who have painstakingly identified all of the problems from 2020, there were well over 11,779 votes, which was the final margin certified as between President Trump and Joe Biden In Georgia in 2020, we have so many thousands more illegal votes that we can identify. I just am praying that the lawyers for the DOJ who have not been living this for five years, are realizing this is not your run of the mill probable cause hearing that they're used to. If they've been criminal prosecutors, this is a very different beast. The Democrats know that that and they are, they're coming in loaded for bear. We have to be prepared.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on one second, Harry. Let me. Harry, what is we talk about DNI and Tulsi Gabbard and Cleta mentioned Iran. Talk to me. There's this Chinese guy. Didn't the grand jury find this Chinese CCP guy living in the states? I think in California and Michigan. Didn't they, don't they, didn't they have a warrant out for him? Or don't they have. Have probable cause that he inserted himself with with voter rolls, Sir.

[Garland Favorito]

So the, the California case was a case of contract fraud associated with A claim that Eugene Yu had committed perjury on the contract associated with whether or not any data was being held overseas. My compass or company I'm associated with did the cyber forensic recovery in East Lansing, Michigan, from the Connick arrest warrant. Eugene Yu was arrested and. And then some shenanigans occurs behind the scenes at the California state level, not only to set Eugene Yu free and cancel the case and make a finding which is highly irregular of innocence. Data was, you know, destroyed. You know, evidence that was collected was destroyed. But the fact of the matter is the findings of my company showed clearly that Connick was connected to international corporations and sending information, information overseas, most particularly to Hongzhou, China, to a company that the naturalized U.S. citizen Eugene Yu had founded this company originally. There's also very troubling other issues associated with this. Anybody that wants to find it, they can find my affidavit regarding this matter. It should have been sealed, but the judge, the corrupt judge in Houston decides to. Harris county decides to release it. The fact of the matter is we found extensive evidence of interconnection with the Chinese and actual root privileges exposed on the Conic system in America to the Chinese company in Hangzhou. And this, this company was clearly a darling of the ccp. So based on clear evidence that was found on, on the Internet app that's been wiped out since.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

But go ahead. Hang on one second. We're gonna take a short commercial break. We're gonna stick with this team and talk about Tina Peters, how this applies to Tina Peters, also artificial intelligence. We're gonna talk about Ukraine. We've got Swigert coming in about President's Day, Washington, Lincoln and Trump all next in the war room. You know, we still need help from the boss. We need help from the boss. This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.