TRUMP & XI TOAST IN CHINA, TAIWAN TENSIONS EXPLODE, RUBIO ISSUES STERN WARNING | LIVE FROM STUDIO 6B - THURSDAY, MAY 14 2026

Summary

---

Podcast Episode Summary: Real America’s Voice – May 14, 2026

TRUMP & XI TOAST IN CHINA, TAIWAN TENSIONS EXPLODE, RUBIO ISSUES STERN WARNING | Live from Studio 6B

---

Main Theme / Overview

This episode, aired on May 14, 2026, centers on President Donald Trump’s historic visit to China for a summit with President Xi Jinping, set against the backdrop of volatile U.S.-China relations, shifting Taiwan tensions, and significant U.S. policy moves. The hosts dissect Trump’s diplomatic and economic maneuvering with Xi, changing trade balances, American military posture, and the escalating rhetoric over Taiwan—including direct commentary on Marco Rubio’s stern warnings.

Aside from the U.S.-China narrative, the discussion also expands to CIA document controversies, Federal Reserve policy shifts, domestic political accountability, and noteworthy sports updates. True to the show’s style, the conversation is robust, candid, and unafraid of controversy, with the hosts debating each other as much as analyzing the news.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Trump’s Visit to China & The U.S.-China Power Dynamic

(07:12 – 12:24; 15:11 – 20:08; 41:45 – 44:58)

• Symbolism & Leverage: Trump’s state visit is framed as entering Beijing not in weakness but with American power and economic momentum. Trump arrives with a “dream team” of U.S. CEOs—Elon Musk, Larry Culp, Kelly Ortberg—underscoring this trip as a forceful business mission (09:00).
• Reshaping Trade: The hosts claim a record drop in U.S.-China trade deficit—$202 billion in 2025, the lowest since 2004 (09:45). U.S. imports from China are down to 9% of total, lowest since China joined the WTO.
• U.S. Strategy: Trump’s approach is “sector-by-sector” negotiation, with focus areas including agriculture (soybeans, dairy, corn), aviation (a deal for 500 Boeing airliners), and high-tech industries (10:30).
• Sanctions and Leverage: Secretary of State Marco Rubio is highlighted for sanctioning Chinese companies linked to Iran’s missile program, emphasizing the multifront pressure on China (11:20).
• Military Context: The U.S. now purportedly positions its Navy “athwart” China’s main oil route in the Strait of Hormuz, giving the U.S. added leverage. Trump’s buildup of military deterrence is juxtaposed with China’s internal purges and economic headwinds.

Quote:
“Donald Trump, as we talked about last night, has put America in a dramatically stronger geopolitical position versus China than we’ve seen in decades… he’s bringing an American dream team of CEOs who dominate—and will dominate—the future.” (09:00 – Host)

2. Taiwan: Flashpoint or Pawn?

(15:42 – 24:07)

• Rubio’s Statement: Marco Rubio underlines that U.S. policy on Taiwan is unchanged and the topic was directly raised, but “we always make clear our position and move on to other topics.” (16:13, 16:35)
• Panel Debate:
  • Delgado: Asserts China blusters on Taiwan but won’t move—if invasion were possible, they’d have done it during previous U.S. “weakness” (16:35, 17:24).
  • Vinnie Mac: Offers a counter-argument, predicting the U.S. will eventually “compromise” on Taiwan “in some way”—perhaps along the Hong Kong model—and the U.S. is unlikely to start WWIII to preserve Taiwan (17:25). He calls for a “prudent decision,” suggesting Trump is posturing to “give a little if we get a lot back.”

Quote:
“I don’t want to give Taiwan away, but I do think something’s gonna happen there that’s a little softer than what Rubio’s saying… We’re not going into World War III for that.” (19:41 – Vinnie Mac)

• Host’s Pushback: The main host questions this stance, suggesting leverage (e.g., U.S. “foot on the oil pipe”) now makes a Taiwan invasion less likely than ever (23:18).

3. Historic State Banquet: Trump & Xi Toast

(41:45 – 44:58)

• Diplomatic Pomp: Coverage of the opulent Beijing ceremony, Trump’s toast inviting Xi to the White House, celebration of U.S.-China ties.
• Key Business Wins: Trump secures a deal for China to purchase 200 Boeing jets—outstripping expectations and framed as a major win for American jobs.

Quote:
“He agreed today to order 200 jets. That’s a big thing. Boeing wanted 150, got 200.” (44:26 – Panelist)

4. CIA Document Scandal & Calls for Accountability

(30:56 – 36:55; 58:00 – 62:42)

• Tulsi Gabbard Files: Discussion centers on the back-and-forth over CIA documents set to be declassified, touching on JFK and COVID-19 origins. The panel is deeply skeptical of CIA motives and calls for transparency and prosecution if wrongdoing is found.

Quote:
“We know the CIA was involved in killing President Kennedy. All right? It just—just take the Band Aid off… And now they’re gonna get caught with these things left and right.” (34:42, 36:04 – Vinnie Mac)

• COVID Lab Leak: Senator Rand Paul and others highlight whistleblower testimony that the CIA suppressed the lab-leak theory and that Dr. Fauci was involved in controlling the official narrative (58:51-61:12).
• Systemic Obstruction: Senator Josh Hawley denounces the “systematic effort to violate the laws of Congress, to lie to the American people, to mislead… and it’s still going on” (61:34).

5. Federal Reserve and the Rate Cuts Debate

(50:35 – 55:57; 74:12 – 77:40)

• Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair: Discussion on his ascension and the challenges ahead—rising inflation, impact of the Iran war. Vigorous disagreement among panelists about whether rate cuts are possible or likely.
  • Host (Damon): Insists inflation is too hot for rate cuts; market and bond markets “do not believe” there will be cuts (52:45, 54:46).
  • Vinnie Mac: Maintains rate cuts may follow the end of the Iran war.
  • Expert Guest (Philip Patrick, Birch Gold): Sides with the host; there is “no catalyst” for cuts, and any attempt could be seen as politically motivated, with consequences for the bond market. Stresses the Fed’s hands are tied unless the economy deteriorates further (74:51-77:06).

6. Birthright Citizenship & Domestic Political Reform

(65:39 – 72:45; 88:14 – 89:55)

• Supreme Court Review: Birth tourism is increasingly marketed internationally; panelists urge Supreme Court to end birthright citizenship for children born to non-citizens (65:39).
• Constitutional Debate: Discussion on original intent, with references to Senator Lyman Trumbull’s 14th amendment drafting and the difference between legal jurisdiction and political allegiance (68:53, 71:02).

7. Sports and Culture Highlights

(26:03 – 30:46; 45:08 – 47:27; 83:36 – 86:48; 92:14 – 94:42)

• Playoff Updates: NHL (e.g., Canadians vs. Sabres), NBA playoffs, NFL season opener and injury outlooks—sports are interspersed as lighter fare.
• Culture:
  • Michael Rapaport’s comedic campaign for NYC mayor, announced on Chris Cuomo’s show (94:55).
  • Satirical banter about new constitutional amendments and media bias (72:05, 91:33).

8. The Media & The New York Times Lawsuit

(89:59 – 91:26)

• NYT Accusations: The Israeli government sues the New York Times for publishing anonymous, unsubstantiated claims against Israeli soldiers, with the panel seeing this as further media bias.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments (With Timestamps)

• Trump’s Leverage:
  “This isn’t weakness. This isn’t apology tours. This is strength. Unapologetic, overwhelming, rebuilt over 16 months of America first policy. Xi knows it, the world knows it. And Trump doesn’t need this deal. China does.” (11:00 – Host)

• Taiwan Realism:
  “I do feel like this negotiation is going to ultimately end—it might not be now—but with a compromise on our part on Taiwan… I don’t see us sending ships in, planes in. We're really not going to go into World War III over Taiwan.” (19:41 – Vinnie Mac)

• CIA Distrust:
  “They took these documents back. And that’s a no-no… We know there’s something to hide. I mean, I felt that way for a long time, especially on the JFK thing. I think we all know what happened there.” (31:34, 34:42 – Vinnie Mac)

• Fauci/COVID Scandal:
  “Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process… by leveraging his position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject matter experts…” (60:00 – James Erdman, CIA whistleblower to Senate)

• Fed Reality Check:
  “There is no, no catalyst, no rationale for the Federal Reserve to do it (cut rates)… If [Warsh] were to cut aggressively into sticky inflation without a genuine labor market deterioration, bond markets are going to interpret that as political accommodation…” (74:51 – 75:51 – Philip Patrick, Birch Gold)

• Media Accountability:
  “The Israelis are taking none of it. They have filed a major lawsuit against the New York Times because it’s an anonymous source with no proof. It didn’t happen. And they went right back…” (89:59 – Vinnie Mac)

• Panel Banter:
  “You do remember the New York Times denied the Holocaust happened? … That’s your baseline…” (91:33 – Host)

---

Important Segment Timestamps & Themes

• Trump’s China Visit, Pomp & Policy: 07:12 – 12:24, 41:45 – 44:58
• Taiwan Debate & Geopolitics: 15:42 – 24:07
• CIA/Deep State, COVID Whistleblower: 30:56 – 36:55, 58:00 – 62:42
• Fed Rate Cuts & Economic Policy: 50:35 – 55:57, 74:12 – 77:40
• Birthright Citizenship Debate: 65:39 – 72:45
• Media Lawsuits (NYT): 89:59 – 91:26
• Sports Updates: 26:03 – 30:46; 45:08 – 47:27; 83:36 – 86:48; 92:14 – 94:42

---

Summing Up / Tone

• Candid, Combative, Energetic: Hosts engage in frank discussions, challenge each other, and lean into controversial takes. A spirit of American realism pervades the conversation.

• Populist / Critical of Establishment: Both government (“deep state,” “CIA cover-ups”) and media (NYT lawsuit, COVID narrative) come under sharp scrutiny.

• Balanced with Lighter Moments: Banter about shirts, sports, and cultural news intersperses the hard-hitting political segments, maintaining an accessible and lively atmosphere.

---

For New Listeners

If you missed the episode, you’ll find:

• Insightful, unsparing commentary on U.S.-China tensions and American global strategy
• A nuanced, often conflicting debate on Taiwan and great-power compromise
• Explosive claims about the CIA and “deep state” obstruction
• Real-time fact-checking on economic policy and the Federal Reserve
• Strong populist undertones, anti-media rhetoric, and accountability demands
• Ample, entertaining sidebars for sports and cultural headlines

Quote for the Road:
“We salute our military, active and active police, firefighters, first responders, EMTs, all emergency personnel… Most of all, thank you the live from Studio 6B audience.” (96:44 – Show Closing)

---

This summary covers all substantive discussion; ad breaks, intro/outro, and unrelated segments are omitted for clarity.

Transcript

[A]

This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.

[B]

Hey, we get it.

[C]

Life is busy.

[A]

Work, soccer, practice, ballet, a PTA meeting.

[C]

And that's just a Tuesday.

[A]

Let beef take something off your plate.

[B]

Quick to cook and easy to love,

[A]

beef makes dinner feel effortless. Grilled, braised, or roasted, it's flavor without the fuss. So let beef take a task off your plate while putting a nutritious meal on it.

[B]

Dinner's ready.

[A]

Beef. It's what's for dinner. Funded by beef farmers and ranchers craving something specific.

[B]

From global flavors to viral snacks, TikTok has it all.

[C]

If you can dream it, you can make it right at home.

[B]

Find your next favorite dish on TikTok. From Real America's music artist, Nguyen comes

[C]

a powerful new anthem honoring the men and women who gave everything for this country.

[B]

Every star, every stripe. From Cowboy Logic, here's to the father. With unforgettable lyrics honoring Valley Forge, Iwo Jima, Arlington, and generations of brave Americans, this is more than a song. It's a reminder of who we are. Download Every star, Every stripe right now. Just scan the QR code or search for it on itunes. Hold you close till my last rest

[A]

is calm

[B]

oh, glory Rav family let's run it up the charts like only you can do.

[D]

If your TV sounds funny in the

[A]

evening, you're watching live from Studio 6B

[D]

on Real America's Voice.

[A]

It is live from Studio 6P on Real America's Voice on a Thursday night, May 14, 8pm on the East Coast. Glad you're in, everybody. Real America's Voice all across the country. All across the world. 1039 LI News radio on your radio, Suffolk County, Long Island. Glad you're in, watching, listening, wherever you are. Slick Rick's here. He's gonna do some sports for you tonight. Slickster. How are you doing?

[C]

Good, Big D. How was your day? Good day today. A little fundraiser for one of our local GOP guys. We got to keep our guys going and support them. Jesse Garcia.

[A]

Garcia, yes.

[C]

He said hello. Aren't you supposed to be on tv? I'm like, jesse, don't worry. I'm heading. I'm heading over there.

[A]

Don't worry.

[C]

Jesse does a lot of work for Suffolk County. He's great.

[B]

Okay.

[A]

Very good. Vin, you haven't been spoken to yet. How was the rest of your day, Slick? Any good?

[C]

Anything good today? Not just busy. Big D, you know?

[A]

All right. Big sports coming up tonight. Big.

[C]

Well, we got. We're going to keep an eye on the playoffs tonight. We got NHL, NBA and the Mets. Fans got some good advice from a former player today as well.

[A]

Sell the team. All right. Very good. Rick Delgado, the Sierra is going to have main headlines. Thursday night Shirt night in full effect. Mr. Delgado, how are you?

[B]

I am good, Damon.

[A]

How's the. Well, no, I was going to say how's the dummy? But I've already talked. I'm already talking to you. How was your day?

[B]

Great.

[A]

Okay.

[B]

Good. Actually, it was good. Good day. Thursday night shirt night. Shove in. Nobody's talking to you. And I just put the finishing touches on.

[A]

Oh, what even is that for tomorrow night? The hint was it's about men.

[B]

Yes, and I'll go even a little further. He Man, Woman Haters Club. I'll just say that.

[A]

Oh, Extreme. One of my favorite bands growing up, Extreme, had a song called that. He Man, Woman Hater.

[D]

Yeah, they were little rascals.

[B]

Yeah, it's a Little Rascal reference.

[A]

Yeah, no, it's Extreme reference. No, it's a little Rascal new. No. Betancourt. Did you ever listen to them?

[B]

Yes, of course.

[A]

Okay. I was a big fan of them. So Vinnie Max in West Palm Beach, Vinnie Mac. What is that shirt? You get a free bowl of soup with that or what?

[B]

Don't worry.

[D]

Dam.

[C]

Yeah.

[D]

Looks good on me. What are you talking about? Last time I wore this suit, you're like, yeah, people are messaging me. Wanted to know where you got that. That shirt.

[C]

Hold on.

[D]

I mean the shirt. Sorry.

[C]

Oh, it's a shirt. Yeah.

[D]

You like? Hey, people want to know where you got that shirt. What kind of shirt it is. Like, it's Tommy Bahama, baby.

[A]

Oh, that's right.

[D]

Yeah. Thank you, Bahama.

[A]

Yeah, that's right.

[C]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[A]

No, no, it does look good on you, Vin. You look good tonight. The hair looks good. Hair pieces in place. You look tan. You look refreshed, decompressed.

[D]

Yeah.

[A]

How's West Palm Beach?

[D]

Well, it's really hot, but today I decided in. In honor of the president's trip to China to go off of Chinese food. So I just had myself a wonderful egg roll.

[A]

Okay.

[D]

And some pork wontons and some mugu gai pan, which I just like saying mugu gai pan so I can order it. I don't even know what it is. And then I know. I know some Chinese. I know how to say thank you in Chinese, so I use that obsessively. Okay. And your welcome is. Is mgoi. So if you ever go out to get your takeout food at Chinese restaurant and they give it to you, say, and they go Ah, you speak a Chinese like. Yeah, I don't really do that.

[B]

Do they say thank you? Thank you, thank you?

[A]

No, that's German. I took Chinese at Hofstra. I took a whole year of it. I can speak just those three words. Yeah, it was an easy A. Everybody told me it's an easy A. The guy never shows up for class. And they were absolutely right.

[B]

Yeah, so because he's too busy spying for China,

[A]

he was too busy stealing the intellectual property of the university, so he never came to class. But that's exactly what happened.

[D]

So, man, very time consuming job.

[A]

All right, so Vinnie Mac's gonna have some news as well. Slickle have sports still gotta got made headlines. Glad you're in. All our friends in the chat, chat, chat, wherever you're watching, make sure you follow us on social media. Let's kick it off tonight with tonight's first word. And my friends, for the first word, here we are. Another banner day in the greatest nation on earth. President Donald Trump has, of course, landed in Beijing like a conquering hero with a royal flush in his pocket. Air Force One didn't sneak in the back door. Oh, no, it rolled up with all the full majesty of the American power behind it. Of course, if you've read the drive by media the last couple days, you'd think that doom is what awaits the president. The Washington Post on Monday wringing their hand, saying Xi is confident in his country's power. Trump is weakened with the US Mired in war. The Council on Foreign Relations out of New York on Sunday solemnly declaring China will have the upper hand at this summit. The general take Trump's reeling from the Iran operation, while Xi Jinping is some sort of infallible mastermind ready to seize global leadership, Xi wants to project China as a more reliable and responsible counterweight to US Volatility, as the Post put it. I mean, these people have got to be kidding me. The reality, which always has a way of slapping these so called experts upside the head, is that Donald Trump, as we talked about last night, has put America in a dramatically stronger geopolitical position versus China than we've seen in decades. Last spring, China was yanking export licenses for critical minerals holding the world's factories hostage. Now today, the US Navy sits athwart China's number one oil route in the Strait of Hormuz. That's a new poker hand being played, folks. That's what's called leverage. While Xi's been spending the past year purging military officers left and right, wrestling a slowing economy and turning inward because China is lagging badly in the AI race. Trump has been on an absolute tear. Cutting trade deals around the world that have attracted trillions in foreign investments, clobbering Iran's military capabilities, ending the rule of China's little chum Nicolas Maduro. Down in Venezuela. The US Pacific Fleet has been out there intercepting those illicit shadow tankers, sneaking oil from Iran and Russia into China's teapot refineries. And that sophisticated display of American military power in Operation Epic Fury. And well, you can bet it made eyeballs pop all over the People's Liberation Army. China experts are already wining the Trump's forfeiting prestige by meeting on Xi's home turf. Nonsense. For a businessman like Trump, it's absolutely irresistible. He's bringing with him an American dream team of CEOs who dominate and will dominate the future. Elon Musk running the show from low earth orbit with Tesla and SpaceX. Larry Culp of GE Aerospace with those top grade aircraft engines. Boeing's Kelly Ortberg ready to talk shop. This isn't some diplomatic grovel session. This is a business trip. Team Trump knows exactly what China's rise did to the American heartland and they're going there to fix it. Here's the good news. The media continues to bury our trade deficit in goods with China fell to 202 billion in 2025, the lowest since 2004. China's share of total US imports down to about 9%, the lowest since they joined the WTO back in 2001. US Trade Representative Jameson Greer laid it all out on April 28. What Trump wants now is a stable, balanced and civil relationship. His plan, manage trade sector by sector negotiations on tariffs, expanding commerce on non sensitive goods. Agriculture will be front and center. Soybeans, dairy, corn for our farmers. Aviation. Boeing could sell up to 500 airliners to China. Trump will come down hard on Beijing for selling Iran sodium pychlorate and other chemicals for ballistic missiles. Secretary of State Marco Rubio just slapped sanctions on those Chinese satellite imagery outfits and the oil terminals that are taking Iranian oil. Dwindling oil supplies will hit their plastics, chemicals and stunt the entire Chinese economy. They may chit chat about AI safety, but America must win the AI race outright. As of May 1, our best model, OpenAI's GPT 5.5 is eight months ahead of China's Deep SEQ version 4 Pro. No phony agreements. Let our tech titans and startups complete compete freely with money, innovation and global deployment. That's how we stay ahead. Yes, China remains a formidable military competitor. They're still landfilling new bases in the South China Sea. They've doubled their nuclear missile missile arsenal from about 250 to over 600, with more coming. But Trump's blend of ironclad military deterrence and smart trade deals is proof positive of America's unrivaled global leadership. This isn't weakness. This isn't apology tours. This is strength. Unapologetic, overwhelming, rebuilt over 16 months of America first policy. She knows it, the world knows it. And Trump doesn't need this deal. China does. That's how you negotiate, folks. That's how you make America respected, prosperous and safe once again. And that's tonight's first word. All right, live from Studio 6B, 11 minutes past the hour. Vinnie Mac, I know you've been watching the president in this trip early on here at the China, and I know you got a lot. You think there's a lot going on. You want to talk about some of it? I'll give you first crack.

[D]

Yeah, I've got a lot to say about it, but I just, I'm going to kind of stay in the same lane that your first word was when we, when Trump got in office, what were we hearing? Greenland. Why? Cuz that's where the Chinese and the Russians are. They've got lots of things, access through there. We had to shut that down. We talked about the Panama Canal. Then, then Hamas hit Israel. We let Israel do their thing, take out Hamas. We didn't handcuff them. Big, big, big move, you know, the Panama Canal, the minerals thing. He went and cut a deal in Congo. He's going to be, do something in Greenland, all over the place to balance that whole minerals thing, then the tariffs, all of these things. And now Iran. Do you think that at some point early in the administration or even before that, they got on a whiteboard and they said, we China under control. What are all the, where are all the moving parts? Like where are we vulnerable with China? And they have picked those off one by one. You articulated that in the first word. But this isn't just happenstance. This is a plan. And now he's meeting in China with Xi, which, by the way, to the point you made, is a great move on their territory. Pomp and circumstance. And now they're talking about all these pieces. There's a lot that has happened here that led up to this meeting. And hopefully once we come back after the break, there's a lot of things that we need to talk about post this meeting. But I Thought the first word. Nailed it.

[A]

All right, 12 minutes past the hour. We'll get Delgado's reaction. We'll get to Slick all on A. Live from Studio 6B Thursday night. Just getting started. We're back right after this.

[C]

Sam,

[A]

If you're into tech, you will love this.

[D]

Tik Tok is a live lab where users post instant reviews of the latest trends. Download TikTok and check it out.

[A]

All right, 17 past the hour. Live from Studio 6B on a Thursday night, May 14th. Slicks doing sports. Delgado is going to do main headlines. Vinnie Mac's going to do some news. I talked about the president's trip to China. Vinnie, were you, were you done?

[D]

Well, I do have some points I want to make or you can come to me on those now if you want Delgado to give his feedback. Yeah, okay.

[A]

Okay. Well, let's do that. Let's Delgado give original his feedback and then we'll see where you guys agree, disagree, or what else we want to talk about. So, Delgado, go ahead.

[B]

Yeah, I think, you know what, you kind of covered most everything. And we've talked about how President Trump has gone about resetting the board from, you know, Venezuela controlling the Panama Canal, now moving over to the Gulf, and just a whole way of how everything here is connected. And the one thing I can, you know, they can rattle their swords all they want about Taiwan. If it was, if they were that confident they could take it, they would have done it already. And they're not.

[A]

Well, I heard Rubio, Rubio today put out some statement saying that nothing has changed with our. Well, there you go. Marco Rubio. Today, U.S. policy on the issue of Taiwan is unchanged as of today. And as of the meeting that we had here today, it was raised. They always raise it on their side. We always make clear our position and we move on to other topics. So there you go.

[B]

And again, that's why I think they're, they're full of it because, let's face it, we, when were we weak? Between 2021 and 2025. January of 2025, that was the prime opportunity. They had their guy in office. They could do what they want, and they still didn't move on Taiwan. That says a lot. So I think, I think now is just, you know, hey, hey, I got a little blustering, but give me, give me about 200 Boeing jets. I need some more intel. I need more of this. And please, Elon, share, share with us how you're actually able to get into space because we need help. I think that's what you're seeing now is all the deals that are starting to be made. And again, if Taiwan was really, really important and they thought they could get away with it, they would have did it before Trump came back in office.

[A]

Vin?

[D]

Yeah, that's. I'm going to have a differing opinion on this, and it's probably not going to be the most popular opinion, and I'm willing to take the shots for it. I have a kind of a view of this and a vision of it that I think is playing out. China has gotten a lot more powerful over the past 10 years, a lot militarily, financially, economically, in a lot of areas. There's been areas that we've had some successes, but Trump has had great successes with China. And one thing that's coming out of this, that is abundantly clear, is we need each other. There's not a us versus them here, there's an us because the US has to kind of be the solution. And I think that's exactly where Trump is going. I'm gonna need you to bend on a few things, Iran, blah, blah. All these pieces that he's doing, he's leveraging China properly to go do that. But at the end of the day, a decision. I think this is where I disagree, Delgado, a little bit with your point, which is, I've been on your point, by the way, for most of the time. Ever since we've been talking about Taiwan and China, I'm like, no, no, no, no. And now I'm looking at it and I'm saying, I don't wanna give up Taiwan, but I do feel like there's going to be this negotiation is going to ultimately end. It might not be now. It might be with a compromise on our part on Taiwan in some way, whether it turns out to be how Hong Kong was handled with the UK or some other way. I don't think there's a path where the Taiwan issue just is like, well, they're not attacking. They're never gonna attack. I think that's sort of overthinking, and I think that's changed now. I believe that the entire solution is us being united and then us loosening up. Maybe our view on the whole Taiwan thing, I don't want to give Taiwan away, but I do think something's gonna happen there that's a little softer than what Rubio's saying and what our politicians have said. And I do think that at some point, China will go in and take Taiwan if they wanted to, because we're not gonna. We're really not gonna go into World War III over Taiwan with all of these implications for all the things happening in the world, in our country related to China and other things. I just don't. I don't see that as ever a possibility. We may say we are, but we're not. We're not going into World War III for that. And I think everyone's got to kind of step back and look at that and say, you know, we. We. I think it would be prudent if we gave a little there, if we got a lot back from them on many of these big issues. And I think that's where it's going. I really do. I think that's how Trets why Trump is playing things the way he is. He knows he's got to give a little. There's. And he's playing it high. He's got Rubio playing it high. But they're gonna. They're gonna soften it, and you watch how he gets beat up for it. But I do think it's the. I think it's the prudent decision.

[A]

So you think if China was to move on Taiwan, the US Wouldn't do anything? Is that what you said?

[D]

I don't think we would make as strong a move as we have indicated we would. I think we might do a few things that are deterrent oriented. I don't see us sending ships in, planes in. I don't see any of that happening. We're not starting World War three over that. I don't see that as a possibility. I frankly see Iran as a way more important target for us to overcome and get control of oil trade, get free running ships through the straits, making sure they don't have nukes, getting them out of China's hand and Russia's hand. Then I see Taiwan, and again, I don't want to see that happen. But China wants Taiwan. This is a big deal.

[E]

She.

[D]

He basically ran on this. His entire platform is about getting Taiwan back. And I think Trump has laid out a full hand of cards with knowing full well at the end of the day, when the fat lady's singing, he's gonna give a little there because that's what's gonna be needed to get everything he wants to get done. That's just my viewpoint, and I know it's a different one. I've been talking to people here at the studio and Eric Bolling and others about it, and there's a lot of debate on it, but I kind of see it that way. I spent a lot of time in Asia. And I understand the Chinese very, very well. I did business there since 1984. Long term relationships, this is how I see it.

[A]

All right. The President actually put out. We should go over it because I think, I don't know how long ago this was, but he put out a truth. When President Xi very elegantly referred to the United States as perhaps being a declining nation, he was referring to the tremendous damage we suffered during the four years of sleepy Joe Biden in the Biden administration. And on that score, he was 100% correct. Our country suffered immeasurably with open borders, high taxes, transgender for everybody, men and women's sports, dei, horrible trade deals, rampant crime, and so much more. President Xi was not referring to the incredible rise that the United States has displayed to the world during the 16 spectacular months of the Trump administration, which includes all time high stock markets and 401ks. Military victory and thriving relationship in Venezuela, the military decimation of Iran, to be continued. Strongest military on earth by far. Economic powerhouse again with a record $18 trillion being invested in the US by others. Best US job market in history with more people working in the US Right now than ever before. Ending country destroying DEI and so many other things that it would be impossible to readily list. In fact, President Xi congratulated me on so many tremendous successes in such a short period of time. Two years ago, we were in fact a nation in decline. On that I fully agree with President Xi. But now the United States is the hottest nation anywhere in the world. And hopefully our relationship with China will be stronger and better than ever before. Delgado, any response to Vin's China can take Taiwan if they want to?

[D]

Yeah, I'm not saying they could take Taiwan. Like I said, it's going to. We're going to loosen up a little. That's.

[B]

I think, I think if they wanted, if they really thought they could do it, they would have done it already. They're not the type of people that are going to sit around and just wait. Look at all the Chinese spies that have been kind of exposed and the flooding of China into this country. If they wanted to take Taiwan, I think they would have taken it by now. I think now even more so, it makes it very hard for them to even think about it because guess who's got his foot on the oil pipe. Oh, you guys want some energy, right? You want some energy to do stuff? Boy, it's gonna be really tough to do all that, all that you want to do when my foot is here on this spigot. I Think the control has totally shifted. And yeah, I don't see Taiwan being a problem at all.

[A]

26 past the hour. Live from Studio 6B. We'll do some sports with second. Get in to some other headlines when we get back right after this.

[C]

Sam.

[D]

Shop the Sherwin Williams Memorial Day sale

[C]

and get 30% off paints and stains

[A]

May 15th through the 28th.

[C]

Whether you're refreshing your interior or exterior, we've got the colors to bring your vision to life.

[A]

And with delivery, getting everything to your

[C]

door is easier than ever.

[B]

Shop online to have it delivered or visit your neighborhood Sherwin Williams store. Click the banner to learn more.

[A]

Retail sales, only some exclusions apply.

[D]

C Store for details. Delivery available on qualifying orders.

[C]

Coming in hot.

[A]

30 minutes past the hour. Scott, we got a concert out here. Friend in the speaker all of a sudden. Live from Studio 6B. Thirty minutes past the hour. Slick's gonna do some sports right now. Delgado is gonna do headlines. Vinny Mac's got some news as well. Sports is brought to you by our friend Mike Lindell. MyPillow.com LFS6 base slickster. What's going on?

[C]

Good game up down in Buffalo, I should say, or up in Buffalo. It's right now the Canadiens 33 with the Sabres. They just got a goal from Josh Anderson to tie it up 8:23 to go in the second period linchpin game. This is a game 5 east second round big D series tied at 2. We're pulling for Buffalo, but right now, 3 3. I'll tell you, this game's got overtime written all over it, in my opinion. Another good game tonight. Golden Knights taking on the Anaheim Ducks. Anaheim looking to save their season and hold off the Knights from moving on to the semifinals. This is game six in Anaheim with the Vegas Knights leading three games to two. That's a 9:30ish puck drop there. No games in the NBA tonight, big D. However, tomorrow night there's a really good game. Six Pistons and Cavaliers controversial call. I'm going to have that coming up shortly there from last night at the end of the game. I should say controversial. No call. I should say 7pm that's tomorrow night. And then at 9:30 you got the spurs looking to close out the Minnesota Timberwolves in the Target center in downtown Minneapolis. I love that area. And that'll be 9:30 tip off there. But I don't know. Big, did you see that call last night? Very controversial there. There was a no call in the final seconds which incensed the Pistons as the Cavaliers rallied to take this the series lead in a stunning game. Eric Victor of New York Post. The Cavaliers got a bit of a favorable road whistle with three seconds remaining in the fourth quarter of a tied game Wednesday. In Game 5, Cavaliers guard Donovan Mitchell was blocked by Pistons stud defender Orson Thompson as he attempted a game winning shot. As the ball trickled down towards the sideline. Thompson gave chase with roughly one second remaining, only for Jarrett Allen to come crashing in. Appearing to step on Thompson's leg and sending him to the ground while the ball scooted away and the clock expired. Aaron, I think we have. We have a little. That roll it out on the. Yeah, they go rapid referee here. Review. Watch this. Now here's Allen.

[B]

First he steps on his foot and

[A]

then he hits him again with his.

[C]

I don't know. That would have been.

[B]

I saw that when that happened. Usually that can two shots at the

[C]

end of the game. Rick. Because the game went to overtime.

[D]

Yeah.

[C]

Tie game there. And he had to take. He made one of two. That game is over. And that game goes to the home Detroit Pistons with a three games to two lead. Unbelievable. I mean JB Bickerstaff was out of his mind. They had to like pull him out of the arena. He was so upset. Now that's kind of. That's. That's the game though. But I thought that was a very controversial no call. Big D, did you catch that one?

[A]

I did not. I just watched it there for the first time.

[C]

Well, what would you say? You're a big bad. You're the biggest basketball guy on the set here.

[A]

I don't know. It looks fine to me. The guy just got to learn how to walk.

[C]

Oh, come on, Big D. Yeah. You tell you.

[E]

Terrible.

[C]

My God almighty. I knew you're going to say that. This guy.

[B]

Well, the funny part. The funny part is that Slick called that game.

[C]

I said it was over.

[B]

He said it was over. Back in the second quarter he said, ah, Detroit's not losing this one.

[C]

I was robbed. Yeah, that's why you want that call NFL schedule. Big D just came out about an hour ago. It was announcing, guess what the big opening game is on Wednesday, September 9th. Big, big game. It's going to be Seattle hosting the New England Patriots and a Super bowl rematch. That's going to be something else. And we'll see if Mike Vrabel makes that game. What do you think, Aaron? You think Mike Vrabel is going to be on the sideline? He's going to be pushing Rossini's stroller for her.

[B]

I don't know. It might be time. We'll have to tell.

[C]

I guess we shall see. And on that NFL Update, Big D ESPN's Adam Schiff gives huge injury updates on Chiefs Patrick Mahomes and the packers and Micah Parsons both sides of the ball here Zach Waslink of yard Barker on December 14, 2025, Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes went down with a torn ACL and torn lcl. Later that same afternoon, Greenier packers star rusher Micah Parsons suffered a season ending torn ACL during a Thursday appearance on the get up program. ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter suggested that Mahomes and Parsons are in different places regarding their ongoing recoveries. According to Scheffer, there is a realistic chance that Mahomes will be in the lineup when the Chiefs open the 2026 regular season with a Monday Night Football game versus the rival Denver Broncos. That's another good game right on September 14th. Schefter's update is hardly shocking as Chiefs general manager Brett Veach recently said that Mahomes was way ahead of schedule in his recovery. A subsequent report noted that members of the Chiefs coaching staff are telling some of their friends around the league that they are hopeful Mahomes will be fully cleared early in training camp and on track for a full season. So Patrick but obviously Parsons the feeling within the organization has been that Parsons would miss the early part of the season, schefter explained. He'll be a candidate to be placed on the pup, the physically unable to Perform list. So we shall see. Packers have a lot of money invested in Micah Parsons. Remember that infamous trade that Jerry Jones made at the beginning of last season when they dealt him to the Green Bay Packers? And that's a wrap in sports. Big D, back to you.

[A]

All right, so very Good Sports brought to you by Mike Lindell. LFS6P is the promo code to use Vinnie Mac in West Palm Beach. Let me come out to you. What do you got for your first news story?

[D]

Well, I don't know if you heard a lot about the chatter going back and forth on these classified or soon to be declassified documents that Tulsi Gabbard had. Have you guys talked about that?

[A]

We talked about this last night as we thought and I emphasize now the word thought because it looks like it wasn't what we thought last night. We thought the headline we heard that her office had gotten rated. But now it turns out that Representative Luna, I don't know if she drank too much coffee yesterday or what, but not exactly what she first said it was.

[D]

Well they didn't raid the office, but they certainly did take some documents back that need to be returned. So that is really part of it. I mean, the story got overblown because it made it seem like there was this hostile move, and they went and did this. And granted, it wasn't as dramatic as people said. However, there were documents that were brought back and they need to be given back to Tulsi Gabbard. And at the end of the day, all this says to me is there's something to hide the CIA. And even if it was done in a nice way, and even if it was done in a way that was not as animated as we thought, like breaking into the office and doing, if they just kind of went in and, you know, did it in any kind of a manner, frankly. But for them to take anything back and try and do something with them, we know there's something to hide. I mean, I felt that way for a long time, especially on the JFK thing. I think we all know what happened there. Just finally. Just tell us exactly. It's like Covid, you know, you hear the whistleblower yesterday or the other day, he was on, and he basically told us what we already knew. But you know what? We want it out. So everybody knows that the controversy is real and that they lied about the origins of COVID and so on. And the same thing here with these issues that Tulsi's trying to declassify. And although it wasn't as dramatic as everyone said, they still did take these documents back. And that's a no. No, frankly, especially since she's getting ready to declassify them. So it's still a story until those documents come back exactly as they were. And if they don't, then there's a really big story here. Why they continually try to cover these things up and lie. The country already knows what happened. Just tell us.

[A]

Well, the President issued a executive order, I believe, too.

[C]

Yeah, Arnold Hoshek.

[A]

So, Delgado, what else do you have on this today?

[B]

Well, let's see, because last night when we covered this, Vin, it was something that Jesse Waters was breaking on his show. Like, he broke into an interview and started talking about it, and then Annapoleon and Luna had talked about it and posted about it, and then she retracted that about 20, 30 minutes later. Yeah, but you're talking about files. MK Ultra, John F. Kennedy, you name it, up and down the line that the CIA said, oh, these files don't actually exist. Well, now it turns out they do exist and that they're Caught red handed. And they want them back so they can try to make them not exist anymore. So you've got a real poll going back and forth between the CIA and Tulsi Gabbard's office. And again, like Damon just said, this is. This is a. An executive order. The CIA, you work for the country. You don't. The country doesn't work for you, right? You have a boss, and he's telling you you're gonna turn this stuff over and she's gonna get it, and. And her office is gonna take it from here. Get out of the way. Because. Just. Because. Just because it implicates a bunch of people they don't want implicated doesn't mean it doesn't get shared. I'm sorry. We're past that.

[D]

The Band Aid's gotta come off, you know, with all this stuff. They just gotta take the Band Aid off. Just tell us exactly what happened. And as I said before, we know what happened. We know the CIA was involved in killing President Kennedy. All right? It just. Just take the Band Aid off. We know they lied about COVID We know Fauci's a crook. We know they all made so much money off of this. They used it for power. Okay, let's put it out there now. Let's just get past it so we can move on with our lives, you know, prove the conspiracy's true, that we know they're true, and move on. So I give Tulsi Gabbard credit. You know, she's been buried so bad by them and that she's trying to do the right thing here. And here she is now, caught in this quagmire of, you know, them doing dirty deeds again.

[B]

You know, Vin, you can't just say move on. We can't just say so we know. So we can see it, and then we can move on.

[D]

No, take action, prosecute these people.

[B]

There is no moving on. There is then repercussions that have to be played out because of that. And if that means certain agencies have to disappear, like one president wanted to make it disappear, so be it. It seems like they're so corrupted at this point that they think they can march around and just grab stuff and say no. You can't see that even to a sitting president. Sounds like. Sounds like. Sounds like we need a rebirth of some of these agencies.

[D]

Well, that's because they got away with that. They have been getting away with that crap. And I agree with you when I say move on. It's like, just prove to us and show us what we Already know. Then go arrest those people that did it. Let's hold everybody accountable. But they've been getting away with this deep state nonsense. The CIA and all this. Obama, Biden let him run amok. And Trump didn't fully have control of them in his first term, as we saw, and now he does. And now they're gonna get caught with these things left and right. So I agree with you. There's gotta be a day of reckoning. I wouldn't wanna see the CIA dismantled because we do need an agency that has to do some dirty things here to stay on top of China and the rest of the folks out there. But they can't go against our country, for God's sakes. You know, they can't do stuff that harms our country. Kills presidents, you know, who knows what else they've done? Yeah.

[A]

People in the chat, for the most part right now, agree with Delgado. People need to be arrested.

[B]

Yeah. I mean, the COVID thing is a great example. Right. Because now we've got one CIA agent who came forward as a whistleblower, and what does the CIA turn around and do? They say, oh, it's just. It's just for theatrical purposes. He's not. There's nothing here. Nothing to see here. Move along. I'm sorry. But having Dr. Fauci change intelligent assessments and inter. Inter. You know, kind of interfere with investigations, I think is kind of a big deal. We'd like to know why it was allowed to happen. We'd like to know why. How much was paid to make sure it could happen and what benefits. Not only did he and people around him, but the CIA themselves, how did they benefit? Why was it good for them to do this? Was it circumventing some more power? Was it kind of creating more of the deep state against President Trump? Because this is when it happened. So I'd love to see that.

[D]

They have to arrest them all.

[B]

I'd love to see that. And I'd love to see. Yeah. Not to mention now arrest somebody.

[C]

Not to mention all the casualties as well.

[B]

Yeah.

[C]

God.

[B]

All the tens of thousands of people that died and the people that are still living with the repercussions of this stuff. I'm talking about COVID That is.

[C]

Yep.

[D]

Yeah, yeah. Absolutely agree.

[A]

All right, 18.

[D]

The COVID thing, it's gonna unravel.

[A]

We'll do some more news. Headline news. Dug out on more sports with sick. Vinny Mac will have some more. Aaron and Fran holding it down on the Thursday day. We're back right after this.

[C]

Sam.

[A]

13 to the hour. Live from Studio 6B, Real American. His voice 139 li news radio. Glad you're in, everybody. Slick's doing sports. Delgado is doing men headlines here right now. Vinny Max in West Palm Beach, Aaron and Fran holding it down as always. Let's do some main headlines. A lot of stuff we've already talked about, but we'll see what else is on the radar tonight. Rick Delgado's got it. What's going on, Delgado?

[B]

Yeah, Damon. Well, we did talk about, we talked about President Trump and his historic trip to China to kind of cozy up and improve those US China relations at the historic Beijing banquet that they've thrown in honor of the President. I know we covered a bunch of that, but I got some clips also. President Trump was out there, had a lot to say. They took turns talking today and each of them toasted each other at the banquet. Towards the conclusion of the first full day in China, which include a pop filled welcome ceremony and more than a two hour bilateral meeting that began in the morning and concluded in the early afternoon Beijing time, Trump said the citizens of the countries have shared deep mutual respect from the beginning of the US China relationship. And of course, the pomp and circumstance wouldn't be complete without some jumping kids. So let's go to cut number one. Here it is. Here's President Trump enjoying the jumping kids of China. Look at this. This doesn't put you in a good mood to have some Chinese food and talk pork with President Xi. I don't know what will.

[D]

Are they jumping to Van Halen?

[B]

I don't know what they're jumping to.

[A]

No.

[B]

Basically they were told to jump or you'll go back to the factory.

[C]

Chuck likes it.

[D]

Look, he loves it.

[B]

He encourages, he loved the kids. Yeah, he talked about it. He pointed it out a few times.

[C]

He couldn't get that kind of response in our country. What, are you kidding?

[B]

Speaking of toasts, here is President Trump offering his toast to President Xi and China over the relationship. Cut number two. Check this out.

[C]

Thank you again, President Xi, for this beautiful welcome. And tonight it is my honor to extend an invitation to you and Madam Peng to visit us at the White House this September 24th. And we look forward to it. And I'd now like to raise a glass and propose a toast to the rich and enduring ties between the American and Chinese people. It's a very special relationship and I want to thank you again. This has been an amazing period of time.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

The appreciation, of course, ran both directions as President Xi also made A toast as well. Chinese admirers of President Washington actually gifted a stone tablet in his memory to adorn Washington Monument. It bears words of a Chinese official who called the great general and statesman a hero among men. That is a statement coming from President Trump. Trump said, the past 250 years of relations between America and China serve as a foundation for a future that benefits both of our nations. Here is President Trump talking with Fox's Sean Hannity afterwards, talking a little bit about what they covered in the first day of talks. Trump mentioned about not giving military aid to Iran as that Iranian situation came up in the discussion. Cut number three. Check this out.

[C]

They're not fighting a war with us or anything.

[B]

No, he said he's not going to give military equipment.

[C]

That's a big statement. He said that today. That's a big statement.

[A]

Said that strongly.

[C]

But at the same time, he said,

[B]

you know, they buy a lot of their oil there.

[D]

They'd like to keep doing that. He'd like to see Hormo straight opened.

[C]

I said, well, we didn't stop it.

[B]

They did it.

[A]

Then we stopped them.

[C]

You know, sort of interesting, he joked. He said, you know, it's sort of,

[A]

if they stopped it, then you stopped them.

[C]

But they'd like to see it opened, but they actually closed it. He didn't like the fact that they're charging tolls.

[D]

I don't know if they are or not.

[C]

I don't know who would pay them.

[D]

I mean, where do they put the money?

[C]

The country's decimated. You know, they're charging tolls. Where's the money going?

[B]

There he is talking about the tolls supposedly being charged by Iran to any ships that want to try and get through the strait. They also talked about business there. Damon. One of the things was a Boeing jet order that Boeing was able to secure a little bit more than they had actually anticipated. Cut number four. Here's President Trump talking about that piece of business getting done. Cut number four. Check this out. Talked about. We talked about a lot of things.

[C]

Too many things to discuss, but a lot of things.

[D]

We had a very good meeting, but

[A]

we want things from them.

[D]

One thing he agreed to today is

[C]

going to order 200 jets.

[D]

That's a big thing.

[C]

Boeing, that's a lot of jobs.

[B]

It's a lot.

[D]

Boeing wanted 150, got 200.

[B]

Yeah. So they're going to purchase. They agreed. The Republic of China agreed to purchase 200 Boeing jets in a multi billion dollar deal just a year after the country ordered airlines not to take any further. Boeing jet deliveries again. President Trump doing what he does and getting deals done that help not only the American companies, but the people that are employed there. So 200 Boeing jets. That's a lot. That's a lot of jobs.

[C]

Yeah, that's a lot of wings.

[A]

All right, 52. Eight minutes till the hour. Let's do some sports. Sports is brought to you by Mike Lindell. LFS6B is the promo code to use. Slickster's got sports. What's going on, Slick?

[C]

DPGA championship underway. Round one today. Play complete at the Aron and Mink Golf Club in Newton Square, Pennsylvania. Seven way tie on day. Everyone shot a three under Big D. Too many names to mention. But we'll keep an eye on that and give you an update tomorrow night. We got Major League Baseball to the diamond. We go Phillies and Red Sox. Good one. No score. Pitchers duel. Bottom seven up in Boston. We got the Cubs right now leading the Braves 1 nothing, mid sixth. Bottom four White Sox over the Royals 4 1. Pirates earlier today defeated the Rockies 7 2. The Cincinnati Reds found their bats and won 151 over the Nationals. Boy, I'm gonna have a drink tonight, that's all. And we got the Mets. Mets win today, too. Wow, it must be a full moon. 9 to 4 over the Tigers in Citi Field. Twins 9 to 1 over the Marlins. Brewers 71 over the Padres. Mariners annihilate the Astros there 8 3. Cardinals 54 over the Athletics, Giants and Dodgers 10 10. First pitch. And speaking of the diamond, Big D, want to get to this story about the New York Mets here now. Noah Syndergaarden has said that the New York Mets should not hang around any longer with that mandami because it's definitely causing a problem. And he advised them to get rid of him and not hang out with that socialist mayor. Dylan Gwynne and Breitbart. Former MLB star Noah Syndergarten advised the New York Mets to stop hanging out with New York City Mayor Zoram Mondame in response to their performance this season. In an interview with Outkicks, Tomi Lahren Synagogue spoke about the New York Mets and how the team's performance this season did not make sense then given its payroll. Currently, the New York mets are the fifth in fifth place in the National League and have a 1625 record. What advice would you give the New York Mets right now? Looking from your position, you know it could be better, laron said. Stop hanging out with the socialist mayor. I guess Cindergarten responded when asked if Laryn and Syndergarten believed the curse was real. He responded, yeah, something like that. I hate saying it, but at the end of the day, the Mets are going to met and it's just. It's just what I mean, I think I'm allowed to kind of say that because I bled orange and blue for, I don't know, eight years. Senegal. I didn't explain. He added that he was kind of disappointed to see the team inviting people like socialist Mondami into the team clubhouse. Cindy Garden's comments came after the New York Mets ended a streak of losing 12 games in a row after they met Mondami. So I don't know, the Mandami curse. Big D for the Mets still, still alive and kicking, but they did win today. So there you go. And that's a wrap.

[A]

All right. It's like very good. 54. 6. 6 minutes till the hour. Live from Studio 6B on hour one. I just saw Rubio. I guess the administration has been given some, obviously some interviews since they've been there and Rubio gave an interview to NBC and this is probably very. Well, it's not probably. It is a big deal. Here's Secretary of State. The Chinese side said they are not in favor of militarizing the Straits of Hormuz and they're not in favor of a tolling system. And that's our position. We don't. We will never support an Iranian tolling system in the Straits of Hormuz, nor do we think they have a right to put mines in international waters. And so it's good that we have alliance or at least agreement on that point. I think the fundamental question is what are we going to do about it? We have a resolution now before the United nations in which 100 and something countries have co signed. The Bahrainis are the sponsor, but we're strongly behind it and been pushing very hard on it. And it very clearly makes those points. So we hope the Chinese will vote for it.

[C]

It.

[A]

So right now we haven't gotten their commitment to vote for it yet at the United Nations. Maybe that'll change after today's meeting. I don't know. Okay, there you go. All right, let's take a wrap on hour one. Hour two. Vinnie Mac's got some more news when we get back to kick off hour two right after this.

[C]

Sam. Sa.

[B]

It's big D. Double dizzle in the

[A]

6B brizzle live on Real America's Voice. Vizzle, baby. Hour two, live from Studio 6B.

[B]

I believe that's called cultural appropriation.

[A]

Yes, Thursday. Come on a Thursday night.

[D]

What was that?

[C]

It's my schnizzle.

[B]

Aren't we on the radio, too?

[A]

Money 1039 LI News Radio, Suffolk County, Long Island. Glad you're all in. Whether you're watching or listening. Slick's doing sports. Doug Otto's doing main headlines. Vinnie Mac is in West Palm Beach. He's going to do some news. Aaron and Fran holding it down as always. Let's actually kick it off with Vinnie Mac. Vinnie Mac, what else is on your news radar tonight?

[D]

Well, I want to talk about the Federal Reserve, but also want to point one last thing out that Trump did accomplish in China is they got the Chinese to buy U.S. soybeans, buy more oil from us, which is a big thing, frankly. Liquefied natural gas in addition to those jets. So he got a bunch of things done there. Maybe it's gonna help our farmers. I hope so. We got a lot of farmers out there in the audience. But I think really good news. This kind of happened very quietly too, that, you know, Kevin Warsh was, you know, approved to become the new Fed chair. The Fed, the head of the Fed. He's been on the board of governors there for a while. So he knows these guys. I think they all know each other now. And one of the things really holding, I think, the economy back besides the Iran war, is our monetary judgments and the decisions that have not been made properly. We still have a housing market that's been a bit of a challenge. We need those mortgage rates lower. We still need to have business loans and all those types of things more manageable and lower. And hopefully they see this. There was a, a discussion about inflation that I thought was pretty important to talk about. Inflation is very, very, very good under Trump. It's been down, it's been in the low 3%. It's up a little now because of the Iran war. That's the single reason when Biden had inflation at 8 point something percent, when Nancy Pelosi and others said nothing about was attributed to their policy decisions, these ridiculous, the Inflation Reduction act and all their spending. That's what caused the inflation.

[C]

Inflation.

[D]

Trump's mint bump in inflation is only due to the Iran war. So we have a Fed chair now that is gonna come in, I believe, who understands that context, unlike the left, who by the way, would spend their ways to getting us into 10, 12%, Jimmy Carter level inflation, but someone that actually understands what to do. Of course, the left has portrayed him as someone who's gonna be a puppet for Trump and just lower Interest rates. But just if you just look at the economy and what's happening with job

[A]

growth, interest rates, there's no way he's going to lower interest rates.

[D]

Why do you say that? I think he will. Why do you say that?

[A]

No chance. My opinion, no chance. I don't think he can. Inflation is already starting to get hot again. Did you see the, did you see the PPI yesterday expected was 4.2. It was 6.1. Regular inflation was expected. 3.2 came in. I think at 3.8. I don't believe there's any way Kevin Warsh can look at what's going on and think that rate cuts are on the table. And if the market is telling you that too, the bond market's telling you that and the regular market is telling you that, if you look at the predictions, I don't think there's a rate cut that even has a majority vote that's possible right now.

[D]

When asked the text, post war, I'm talking post war. So I think the war is attributed to all of those things. I'm not the only one. Plenty of economists have come out and said this blip in inflation, blip in the ppi, all these things are directly due to this war with Iran. And when that war ends, which is hopefully very, very soon, or there's a conclusion to it, whenever that next timetable is for them to lower rates, I think they will. I think they all understand that the inflation, all these indicators are a direct result of that because prior to it, we weren't seeing things nearly tracking like this well. And also, I have to say, just from a hopeful standpoint, I'm hoping they do when this war ends and we get, we clean this up a little bit, whenever that timetable is, I'm hoping they lower interest rates by more than a quarter of a point, frankly. So there was a lot of back and forth about the impact of the war. I think, Damon, I think you gotta keep that in context to these points that you're making because unlike what Biden did, where they directly drove inflation up with their policies, as I said before, this is all about this war, all about what we're spending on the war, all about these things.

[A]

I, I hear you, Vin. I just don't agree with you. I just don't think he's going to, I think he's going to keep the federal funds rate right where it is at about 3:5 to 3:7 or wherever it is right now.

[D]

I, I don't think the year will end.

[A]

I think when you have year over year interest rates higher than where the 3.8 is, higher than where the Federal Fundraise right now. I don't, I don't think he can lower rates. I just don't think he can do it. And by the way, he may think, okay, well, it's because of the war. But that doesn't change, that doesn't change the way he's going to think about what would happen if he still lowered him. He doesn't want inflation to go from 3.8 back to 6. Like the producer price index just went from expected 4.2. It came in at I think 6.1 or 6.2 the other day. That is, that is not a scenario where, where the Fed go, the Fed Federal Reserve chair is going to say, yeah, we should just cut rates. I mean, I just don't think it's going to happen.

[D]

But you could, I'm looking at the fall for that. Yeah. So we'll see. Let's track this and we'll see how this all comes down. But I think by September some of these decisions will be made and I think they'll be made with the downward notion on interest rates.

[A]

I mean, the last federal funds rates at 3 and a half to 3.75 held steady in April. Inflation surged 3.8 year over year in April, highest since May of 2023, driven by energy spikes from the Iran conflict, shelter costs and other factors. Core inflation has also been edging higher markets now price in low odds of any cuts and some chance of hikes by late 2026. Warsh officially takes over his Fed chair this week, replacing Jerome Powell as Fed governor from 2006 to 2011. Warsh favored higher rates to fight inflation and was skeptical of post crisis stimulus. He has argued for lower rates, citing AI driven productivity gains that could allow looser policy recently without reigniting inflation. He criticized Powell's restrictive stance and aligned somewhat with Trump's call for cuts. During confirmation, he repeatedly said he made no deal with Trump to cut rates and would base his decisions on data, not on politics. Most analysts expect rates to stay on hold or possibly face hikes due to hot inflation and energy prices. Warsh's first meeting may focus on keeping options open rather than cutting. So we'll see.

[D]

Yeah, yeah, that's good data though. And to me, all that data points to the war. That's, that's, that's where I see it.

[A]

Yeah. All right. What else, Finn, Anything else?

[D]

No, I got other stories that when you come back around, I'll pick them up.

[C]

Yeah.

[A]

All right, let's do some. By the way, they started casting for the new 007 James Bond today. Did you hear this?

[B]

Did they?

[D]

Yeah, I did. I got a call.

[A]

You did you get a call, Vin? My understanding is there's only one guy who can. Can fit the bill, and of course that's him. So we'll see if he gets the part or not, but that's my understanding.

[C]

So that looks good.

[A]

Let's do some headlines. Delgado's got him. What's going on, Delgado?

[B]

All right, well, great. Hitting up on. We kind of touched on yesterday. Didn't have a chance to get to. Vinny mentioned it earlier as well. When it comes to people paying for their crimes, basically, a whistleblower tells Congress that the CIA illegally spied on White House officials investigating the COVID origins. Among other things, CIA officer James Erdman told the Senate Homeland Security Committee that consisted of only Republicans because Democrats didn't want to show up to hear the truth, that his employer suppressed its own assessments that Covid likely came from a lab. Believe it or not, here is Rand Paul, who was leading this part of his opening statement on the cleanup that he saw coming from the Biden administration on their way out the door. Cut number five. Check this out. Rand Paul. According to his testimony, CIA scientific analysts

[C]

concluded multiple times between 2021 and 2023

[A]

that a lab leak was the most likely origin of COVID 19.

[C]

Yet those conclusions never shaped the official

[A]

narrative, never made the intelligence report.

[C]

Congress was never told.

[A]

It was not until after the 2024 election that the outgoing Biden administration directed the CIA to issue an assessment not because of new intelligence, but so officials could walk out of the door claiming

[C]

there was nothing left to find. That is not analysis.

[A]

That is a cleanup operation.

[B]

Yeah, that is coming from Rand Paul, the senator in charge of that. In January of 2025, the CIA, now helmed by the Trump administration and Trump appointed director John Ratcliffe, said publicly that it now assessed that the lab leak is the most likely origin point for Covid. Previously, the agency had been, quote, unquote, non committal. Here is that whistleblower James Erdman and testifying about Dr. Fauci and what he's responsible for. Cut six. Check this out.

[A]

Dr. Fauci's role in the COVID up was intentional.

[C]

Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list

[B]

of curated subject matter experts, public health officials and scientists.

[C]

This included some of the authors of the paper.

[B]

The proximal origin of SARS CoV 2

[D]

and other public health experts who have

[B]

been in his orbit for the last 20 plus years. Yeah. In testimony Erdman said that the wider intelligence community initial reluctance to land on the lab leak conclusion was a product of the influence of the former COVID 19 advisor Anthony Fauci, who curated lists of scientists for agencies to consult. Basically telling the agency, this is who you're going to talk to. This who, who you're going to get your information from. Here is Rand Paul on the resistance from the CIA because we've seen it. We saw with some of the things they grabbed from Tulsi Gabbard on their reluctance to hand over information. Cut seven. Thank you.

[C]

Mr. Erdman.

[B]

Is it your testimony that there is still resistance from the CIA to comply with the law we passed to declassify

[A]

all the COVID information? Yes.

[B]

Yeah, pretty, pretty definitive answer there.

[C]

No hesitation.

[B]

Yeah, no hesitation. He got right to the point.

[A]

Think about it for a second before you answer.

[B]

Yeah, exactly. And finally, here's John Holly. Here's Senator Josh Hawley coming out of the of the hearing and what he had to say on the COVID up. Cut 8.

[A]

This witness just testified under oath that the COVID origins report that the last administration issued was false when it said that there's no evidence of Wuhan lab related activity and Covid that that was false. He just testified that when the last administration said that they were turning over all of the information that they could related to Covid that that's totally false. They gave us five pages. He said there are thousands and thousands and thousands of pages that were never turned over. I mean it's, it's unbelievable. We have basically a systematic effort to violate the laws of Congress to lie to the American people, to mislead the American people. And it's still going on. The deep state actors. It is still going on. If you're going to have, if you've got people who will just not follow the laws of Congress and will lie openly to the American people, I don't know how you can hope to preserve our country. I just don't know how you can do it.

[B]

So strong words there from Josh Hawley. And now because of this, the DOJ is weighing a new criminal case against Dr. Fauci despite the auto pen pardon from President Biden. So we'll see what happens with that. But that is coming out of the DOJ.

[A]

All right, 13 past the hour. Live from Studio 6B Hour 2. Real American's voice. More to do. We're back right after this, Sam. Well, sound like the blues. 17 past the hour, we'll talk to you about our friends at my Patriot Supply. In the last few years, if that's taught us anything, it's that the systems we rely on, well, you know, they can fail. And when they do, well, you're on your own. That's why I want to tell you about my Patriot Supply. America's original Patriot Preparedness Company. They've hoped, They've helped over 3 million American families get prepared since 2008 with more than 90,000 five star reviews. And right now, they've got a special offer that you really need to check out. When you get their flagship solar backup generator, the ultra powerful Grid Dr. 3300, you'll also get over a thousand dollars worth of survival essentials absolutely free. Four weeks of emergency food, water filtration, and much more, all out, absolutely free. It's in stock and ready to ship right now. But with everything going on right now, there's no telling how long it'll be available. So go to preparewithrav.com right now, this second to see everything you can get absolutely free. Preparewithrav.com preparewithrav.com don't wait until it's too late. Get your complete preparedness set up today at prepared with rav.com prepare with rab. All one word, prepare with rav. And make sure you're prepared for whatever comes next. Solar backup generator, the Grid Dr. $3,300 and a thousand dollars worth of survival essentials absolutely free. Preparewithrav.com preparewithrav.com Our friends at My Patriot Supply. All right, 18 past the hour. Live from Studio 6B, Vinnie Mac is in West Palm Beach, Florida. Vinnie Mac, what's going on?

[D]

Yeah, I wanna get back to this whole birthright citizenship thing. You know, the Supreme Court is still evaluating this entire matter, which, by the way, is troubling in itself because, I don't know, this seems to be another one of those black and white issues, like allowing people just to come into our country who are pregnant and automatically becoming citizens. Like, haven't we seen enough abuse of that? And I think part of their evaluation, I hope, is influenced by what James Comer is trying to do, which is they're launching a probe into what is happening now called birthright tourism. This is happening in China, this is happening out of Russia. It's happening in other countries where they're basically groups planning tours and visits and travel to the United States to have the babies here. It's becoming a marketing Thing for tourism, if that doesn't tell the Supreme Court everything you need to know about how crooked and how wrong birthright citizenship is, I don't know what is. You know, if you look back into the 1880s, I think when all this happened to help the slaves become citizens and to drive them back into the society, there's a reason that we did this, and it made all the sense in the world, by the way. It was absolutely the right thing to do then, but now it's completely out of hand. We saw what happened with the illegal immigration and immigrants coming here for decades and just having kids here all over the place because they know they'll be US Citizens and get the benefits and the families live off that. I mean, it's just flat out wrong. So now that James Comer's taken it to another level, which is going after these agencies and organizations that are using it as a marketing tool, that's how out of control these things get. You know, we look at fraud that's happening all over our country for all sorts of things from. From schools, autism schools. Everything else you can imagine is fraud everywhere. They are blowing our tax dollars on so many crazy things. And then you see organizations taking advantage of. Of, frankly, a loophole that should have been closed decades ago. Birthright citizenship and creating tours that bring more people in here to travel to the United States to have a baby who then becomes a citizen. I mean, it is so upside down. And I think it's part of the things that just drive me crazy with our country and how it's managed and how our politicians just don't really care because they don't have to. They allow these things to continue. Supreme Courts have been asked to look at this issue for a long time. They're finally doing that. And here we find businesses that are taking care of it. I would say the last point on this, the one really good thing, is James Comer and his team, they're going after anybody and everybody that's committing bad things for our country. And here's one of them. With this birthright tourism you saw, JD Vance is leading the whole fraud investigations on a. Comer's doing more of that as well. I mean, they're going after so many things right now, it's like Doge 2. But this caught my eye because I'm wondering, when's the Supreme Court going to rule on this? And I can't imagine a world where they wouldn't rule against it and just eliminate birthright citizenship. So interesting that they're doing this now. And hopefully it has an effect.

[A]

Let me go back to my first word that I did on this many months ago, because I touched on a couple of these topics in there. I said, first of all, integral to the US Constitutional framework is the principle of consent based governance. The idea that individuals can unilaterally impose citizenship upon a country without the consent of its people or their representatives flies in the face of this foundational principle. Those who argue that the children of illegal immigrants are automatically entitled to citizenship overlooked this foundational concept. And then later on I said, consider the words of Senator Lyman Trumbull, a key figure in drafting the 14th amendment. During debates, Trumbull made it clear that subject to the jurisdiction meant complete jurisdiction where no allegiance was owed to any other power. So take British tourists for example, in the United States. Well, yes, they're subject to our laws while they are here. They must follow the traffic regulations and other territorial laws, but they remain subjects of the United Kingdom, not political participants in the US System. Their temporary status does not confer voting rights, jury service or citizenship. The same logic applies to individuals present in the country unlawfully. Their physical presence does not and should not equate to full political jurisdiction or allegiance. So Vin, to your point on the Taurus and, and the births here, you know, you again, you'd think the Supreme Court, that this is clear as the day is long, but this is what I've argued forever, that we're always two or three conservative justices away from a conservative court where you don't have to worry that one day somebody wakes up on the wrong side of the bed and something that never was meant to be a human right all of a sudden is. And something that so clearly should be all of a sudden is not. And that seems to be the ever fight that we're in with this court and John Roberts.

[D]

Yeah. And you talk about political decisions within the court. A political decision would be allowing birthright citizenship to continue because of all the free open borders talk and all that political stuff. Cause that's. Those are just political narratives doing what you just said, which is really honoring what the Constitution and how the framers of the country laid it out. It's logical you don't see any daylight to a decision other than eliminating birthright citizenship. So we'll see how if our Supreme Court is gonna act politically or if they're gonna act appropriately. And we know who the political characters are on that court. And there's more than we're comfortable with. Right. We've got a few on the Republican side too. The conservative side, but we know the cast of characters there. And I think that's great that you went back to your first word on that because you absolutely nailed it back then. And it's worth pointing out again. So let's hope for the best.

[B]

Yeah. It kind of reminds me of when Joe Biden created a brand new amendment. Remember just before.

[A]

Yeah, that was the 28th or something.

[B]

28th amendment. When he was creating the 28th amendment, making it the law of the land

[D]

as only he can.

[B]

Yeah, but that's exactly the same thing here with the birthright citizenship.

[A]

I think we created the 28th. 29th, I think, later on that night, didn't we?

[B]

Yep.

[A]

Right, Aaron? Yeah, we did. We created the 29th amendment after Biden did the 28th. I forget what the 29th was. It was pretty funny, though, if I remember when. We'll have to go back and look. Yeah. Have to go back to the tape and make sure everybody's, you know, aware of what the new amendment. Aware of what the 29th Amendment is and that they're acting appropriate.

[B]

Right. We're not in violation.

[A]

Not in violation.

[B]

My goodness, that would be awful.

[A]

We probably. 26 bestie hour live from Studio 6B. We're back right after this.

[B]

Speaking of waffle like Ben's shirt, Sam.

[A]

All right, 30 minutes past the hour. Live from Studio 6B on a Thursday, May 14th. Slick's doing sports. Dug Otto's doing main headlines. Vinny Max in West Palm beach, he's doing news. And right now, on a perfect night, as me and Vin were arguing about this before, I am happy to welcome back to the show precious metal specialist from the Birch Gold group, Philip Patrick. Mr. Patrick, welcome back. How are you?

[E]

I'm doing well. How are you?

[A]

Very good. I'm very happy that you're here tonight. I didn't even realize you were on. And I'm so happy because about three segments ago, me and Vin were arguing on the show because Vin thinks that there's going to be rate cuts. And I just said there's just. Thank you. There's just no way that's happening given this scenario that Kevin Warsh is walking into here with the PPI coming in at 6 when they expected 4.2 and 3.8, year over year inflation and things heating up again. Please educate my good friend in West Palm Beach.

[E]

I'm sorry to do this to you, sir, but there's. There's no catalyst. Listen, I don't envy Kevin Walsh at all. President Trump's going to be putting a lot of pressure on him to lower rates. But the reality is there is no, no catalyst, no rationale for the Federal

[D]

Reserve to do it.

[E]

Employment numbers came in. Ok. Labor softening a little bit. Corporation is skyrocketing.

[B]

Right.

[E]

It's up aggressively on the back of higher energy prices. There simply isn't the catalyst to do it. And I think if he were to cut aggressively into sticky inflation without a genuine labor market deterioration, I think bond markets are going to interpret that as political accommodation rather than independent monetary policy. And the long end of the yield is going to go up regardless. And I think he realizes that. And ultimately, if there's a bet on the table, I'm joining Damon, I think next year at the earliest for rate cuts.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, and that's what the markets and the bond markets are telling us. People think there could be hikes on the table. Now, I don't know if I would be willing to go that far, but I think Kevin Warsh is in, like you say, a very, very tough spot. We all know the President has complained about Jerome Powell, but that was a different, different world on cutting rates. And maybe I would have agreed with him on Powell back then. But fast forward to today. I don't, I don't see a scenario where Kevin Warsh can do it. But let's, let's stay on him for a second because he obviously has the same dual mandate that, that every Fed chairman has. But what changes do you think we could see with Kevin Warsh taking the helm?

[E]

I don't think there's a huge amount. Look, what they're focused on is not to try and repeat the transitory mistake of 2021. They're yet revisiting openly the failures in 2021 and asking if today's tariff plus energy shock could become persistent. And you mentioned rate or potential rate hikes earlier. I don't see them on the horizon. But if this war is drawn out and longer, inflation I think will rise dramatically and it may force the Fed's hand. But the Fed have a political and an economic problem.

[B]

Right.

[E]

If they cut too soon, soon inflation's going to reignite, which is doing already hold rates too high and consumers, housing and debt markets keep weakening. So it's a real tough one. The real oversight though, the Fed models can measure prices, but they can't measure household exhaustion. Right. And that's the problem that we have right now. And I think Kevin Walsh is looking to build credibility in the Fed. So I, you know, like I said, his hands are tied for now. Now we'll see what happens longer term. But the economy is going to have to take a turn for them to do anything of value.

[A]

Yeah, you know, you look at the headlines and the White House obviously tries to seize on any, any good news and who can blame them? And there is a lot of good news. But when it, when it comes to inflation, right now, the PPI to me is a big eye opener the other day coming in really, really hot. And that's going to transfer to the consumer eventually, potentially. But why do people, most Americans still feel like they are struggling to get through week to week, month to month?

[E]

This is probably the most confusing economy because you see the numbers coming out and then you look at your lived reality and there isn't, there isn't a match. But I think we're looking at a deeply split economy. You look at sectors like AI along with the wealthiest households, they're holding up while lower and middle income households is being squeezed, squeezed month by month. Goldman Sachs described the economy recently as bending, not breaking, which I think is useful. Right, because it explains how the economy has not adapted, but also admits that the risks are skewed to the downside. GDP growth, job creation, both solid. At the same time, we've got corporate executive warning that working class families are running out of money. So what we're seeing is what we've talked about before, which is a K shaped economy. Growth at the top keeps averages looking respectable while the bottom half is struggling using buy now, pay later for groceries. So it's a really, really tough climate. And I think the White House are waking up to this, obviously in anticipation of the midterms. We've got the administration now talking about setting up new oil refineries, suspending tariffs on import beef, you know, federal fuel taxes to lower prices. So they see the problem and it's definitely welcome. But I think it's also a reflection of how much American families are struggling at the moment. So it's a tough one to work out.

[A]

Yeah. Let's talk about gold. In this economy, obviously gold made a huge run to about what, 5,400. It's had a, what I would consider a very healthy pullback because you don't want to go up in a straight line to the right. Right. And now it's kind of hovering around 4619. What, what do you see for gold here in the next six months?

[E]

Look, longer term, I think it goes up. JP Morgan now forecasting 6300 for gold by the end of the year, if not early next year. I I agree with you. I think the dip in pricing for gold and silver was very necessary. Gold had run I think a high of like 70 something percent last year. Silver was up 150. The started the year gangbusters and I think we saw a lot of liquidations, predominantly from the paper markets.

[D]

Right.

[E]

A lot of these people were buying on leverage, particularly in the silver market, having to meet margin calls and ultimately that leads to a sell off. I also think the Iran war in general has made everybody sort of sit and pause and we saw big flows into US dollars, so a lot of movement to cash. But for me, when I look at gold prices longer term, I focus on the longer term. Fundamentals. Fundamentals. We saw a record quarter for gold buying. First quarter of 26 was the single biggest quarter for gold buying ever in world history. So the demand is there. We still haven't got a handle on deficit. Dollars still losing value relatively. Inflation now is spiking again. So I think the fundamentals for precious metals are stronger today than they've been really at any other point that we're talking. And I think we're going to continue to see upside. Silver, today's trading in the mid-80s. We hit $120 briefly in January. I think over the next year or two we'll revisit those highs and push beyond. So fundamentals are strong and I think there's a really good buying opportunity for those who are looking at it.

[A]

We're speaking with Philip Patrick, he's the precious metal specialist over at Birch Gold. And you can text America to 989-898 to get started with them and see if gold and the precious metals is right for you. You text America to 989-898. Always a pleasure to have you on, sir. Thank you very much.

[E]

Thank you.

[A]

Phil Patrick from Birch Gold. Vinnie Mac, would you like to jump back in here on this?

[D]

I don't know what the problem was with the Internet and the this voice, but I couldn't hear anything he said up until the last half of the segment there.

[C]

Oh yeah, sure.

[D]

I'm not sure what he was talking about night. I totally respect where he's coming from and I get the fundamentals that you're pointing to as well. I do, I understand that. I just disagree. I think we'll have rates lower sooner than you think and I think they would be good for the economy. That's just, you know, I just see a lot of stuff changing dramatically after this conflict with Iran. When that's over, I think some of these Things are going to be happening. That's okay. I haven't changed my mind.

[B]

And I'm gonna jump on kind of the middle part of that fence there that Vin is on between. Between you and him. Only because. And only because I'm reflecting back on something that Philip said, that they're going to look back to make sure that they're not making the same mistakes they made, you know, the Fed made during the Biden administration. So they're going to be looking back at that stuff. But also I've heard a lot of talk about with the new Fed chair coming in, that they're gonna look to use more or better technology to get better information so they can make better decisions when it comes to rate cuts, because a lot of the information that they've complained about was lagging information. It was months old and they couldn't respond to it properly. So I hope he leads the charge in that, in seeing a more. And like Philip said, not repeating the mistakes of the Biden administration, but trying to be more active and. And trying to do things to spur the economy where they can.

[A]

Yeah. All right, 39 past the hour. Live from Studio 6B, let's do some sports. Sports brought to you by Mike Lindell. Slickster's got it. What's going on, Slick?

[C]

All right, Big D. Well, the Montreal Canadians have scored four unanswered goals, lead six to three over Buffalo right now and not looking good there. This is a game five, 328 to go there in the third. So it looks like Buffalo is going to be in a do a die position for a Game 6 on Saturday in Montreal, hoping to force a Game 7, and that would be on Monday night. So, wow, really crazy there. And the Golden Knights taken on the Ducks. Was scheduled to be a 9:30 puck drop, but obviously they pushed that off with the early game still rolling. So that'll probably be more like a 951st puck. No NBA games, obviously, tonight. Pistons at the Cavs tomorrow night. That's a seven o' clock tip off. And that's a big game, obviously, for Detroit if they want to continue to advance that series. Otherwise, they'll be eliminated. And that game is in Cleveland. Cleveland spurs taken on the Timberwolves at the Target center in Minneapolis. That's also 9:30. And, well, golden tempo trainer Sherry Devoe calls criticism of Preakness decision unfair. The horse is not a machine. She's still getting a lot of pushback because the horse isn't running the second leg here and she's got a very good reason why and we kind of covered this after the Derby ourselves. This is Ryan Canfield of Fox News. Golden Tempo is not running in the Preakness Stakes after winning the Kentucky Derby, and trainer Sherry DeVoe said they are folks focused on the bigger picture. DeVoe, 44, told Fox Digital in a recent interview that most of the reactions to Golden Knight not participating and missing out on a chance for the Triple Crown have been positive. She did label the criticism about the decision to rest Golden Tempo as unfair. It's been a mix of both mostly positive, which I appreciate and I understand that fans of the sport or fans of the Triple Crown are disappointed, but the horse is not a machine, devoe said. I have to advocate as the trainer to the ownership or the clients and we had a conversation. It wasn't my decision, it was a decision we made as a group and I'm sorry if people don't understand what goes into it. Why enter the Derby if you're not going to run the Triple Cram? And you know, she goes in to talk about, you know, it's a different setup this year with the tracks. We touched on this as well with Belmont obviously being redone and she says, you know, it's just the Preaknesses are traditionally held at Pillmico Racecourse in Baltimore, but are being held at Laurel park due to renovations. The Belmont Stakes are normally held at Belmont in Elmont, New York, but are being held at Saratoga. And she says due to renovations, the Kentucky Derby was still held at Churchill Downs this year and Devone obviously made history as the first woman female trainer to win in the Kentucky Derby. Big D. But she doesn't like these courses. They're longer and they don't want to burn this horse out and who knows, they may bring the horse back possibly next year, you know, but just really good, good stuff there. So I just wanted to get that and well, Netflix, of course this Netflix has taken over football. Really a shame. Netflix expands dominance with Christmas and games and a game in Australia Breitbart News AP Netflix has expanded its inventory of NFL games and will have a season long presence with the league under a new deal announced earlier yesterday. The streaming service will have five regular season games as well as the NFL honors through 2029. It had been carrying two games on Christmas Day since 2024. The announcement was made during its upfront presentation to advertisers. Netflix will air game one on Thanksgiving and one on Christmas Day and then a second game on Saturday, the final regular season of the week.

[E]

But

[A]

all right One more to go. We'll wrap it up for a Thursday night. We'll get to everybody when we get back. Live from Studio 6B right after this.

[C]

Sam.

[A]

13 to the hour. Last segment of a Thursday night live from Studio 6B. Appreciate wherever you're watching or listening from Real America's Voice, 1039 LI News radio sign Slick's been doing sports. He'll do some more right now. Rick Delgado has been doing headlines. Vinnie Max in West Palm beach and Vinnie Mac, I'll start with you. What's left on your news radar tonight?

[D]

Well, I got two little things here. One, I don't know if you guys heard about the Senate passing legislation about stop paying themselves during shutdowns. Did you hear about this?

[A]

No.

[D]

You guys hear the, the news? Yeah. Apparently there's some activity on, on getting that passed or it might have passed. I'm getting conflicting information so I need to check that out. But when you think about like a topic like this, we have been watching our congressmen and senators for decades and decades making money on our backs through fraud, through insider trading and no ramifications on anything that they do that hurts us. Like a government shutdown where people don't get paid. There's literally no checks and balances to how, how they conduct themselves. They're just scot free no matter what, which is why they make these dumb decisions and why they're driven to let politics overrule things. So there's something cooking right now on legislation that they, and maybe someone in the audience has seen this. Cuz I saw something come across that said they passed something that said that they can't pay themselves if there's a government shutdown. So we'll follow that story. But I think that's a fairly interesting turn of events. I'd like to see that across the board. You guys haven't heard anything about that?

[A]

No. So how would it work? They wouldn't get paid just when the government shut down?

[D]

That's right. When people aren't getting paid because of a shutdown, they would not be getting paid. Which, you know, I mean, it's a little tit for tat, but not a bad tit for tat. Like they shouldn't get paid if they're going to withhold salaries from people over some political issue. They can just do that willy nilly like they did. I mean we just watched it go on for ridiculous amounts of time.

[A]

All right, very good. Is that it? You said you had two quick things. Is that it?

[D]

I got one more quick story. The New York Times is at it again. I don't know if you heard some of the coverage with the Hamas terrorists and how they treated the Israelis and raping women and doing all kinds of disgusting things. Well, of course, the New York Times, which is no friend of Israel's, which seems to be be pro Hamas, pro terrorist, pro socialist, pro anything that's not have a fundamental good thing for our country, they come out with a story from an anonymous source accusing Israeli soldiers of doing some of those things to Palestinian prisoners. The good part of this story is the Israelis are taking none of it. They have filed a major lawsuit against the New York Times because it's an anonymous source with no proof it didn't happen. And they went right back. Israeli government, by the way, is suing the New York Times over this story. And it's just typical, the New York Times, they print these things based on an anonymous source. Usually it's hearsay or it's just some lie that anybody could say it. Some guy at a bar could say it, and they would print it as fact, like they did here. And I just. I'm so sick of their bias and taking advantage of situations and creating more hatred in this world for the Israelis. That's not needed. I don't know what happened to the New York Times, man. I just don't know what happened to them. They're so upside down on every issue and so biased. And here's another one. So kudos to the Israeli government, by the way, for not taking it. This just happened.

[A]

You do remember the New York Times. You do remember the New York Times denied the Holocaust happened?

[C]

That's true.

[A]

I mean, so I don't know that this is too much of a shock beneath them. If that's kind of like your baseline, that's not much past that. That's gonna be. You know what I mean?

[D]

Well, the story's not a shock. It's the rebuttal. You know, all of these things. Trump, they say stuff about Trump. Trump sues, you know, he wins these lawsuits against CBS and others. You know, you have to now fight back. And that's really. The story is Israel saying that's BS and we're fighting back, and that needs to happen. They can't get away with that nonsense anymore. The Holocaust never happened. I mean, please.

[A]

All right. Nine minutes to the hour. Live from Studio 6B, slicks. Anything left in sports you haven't covered?

[C]

Yeah, Big D. Well, NHL, it's all over in Buffalo. The Canadiens took that game six to three, four uninsured goals too much to come back. They now lead the series. Three, two. And they're getting it ready to rev it up in the Honda Center. Big D with the Golden Knights taking on the Ducks in Anaheim. No score just underway, 1940 to go there in the first Scottie Scheffler's shoes at PGA Championship pay tribute to one of the wildest stories in golf history. Long story, but I'll be quick. Mark Harris of Outdoor Kick, here we go. Scotty Sheffield will be wearing a pair of golf shoes with a two word message printed on the bottom of them during the PGA Championship at Aeronautic Golf Club this week. And it's a tip of the cap to one of the wildest stories in golf history. For years now, Nike has released a special edition golf shoes for each of the four major championships. And this week is no different. The Swoosh brand released three different models for the PGA Championship, all in the same colorway and all with the word lost on the bottom of one shoe and found on the bottom of the other. You know, big deal, I love the that. But the two word tribute is to the great Walter Hagen, who won five PGA Championships. But apparently back in 1925, they lost the trophy. So this is a tribute to that way back when and how the trophy was found. They used to play at a place called Olympia Fields way back then, Big D in the early, in the early to mid 20s there. And as it turns out, the trophy never made it to Hagan's Hotel. A major champion trophy was officially lost. However, years later, they found it. So, so just a little lost and found tribute. Just a cute little quirky thing. At the PGA Championship, we had seven guys today shoot a three under. But we know everything's going to change tomorrow and Saturday.

[A]

Well, it's the slick rule. Whoever's leading on Thursday is not going to win the tournament.

[C]

Generally speaking, nobody rolls all four days. We haven't seen too many times that happen, so we shall see. We'll have a report tomorrow night. Big D. That's a pick.

[A]

Do you have a pick for who you think is going to win?

[C]

I thought Scheffler was going to win, but he shot terribly today. He didn't do too good. Was he a seven under? I believe so. I have a funny feeling, though, I think Scotty's going to pick it back. Up. Up. Rory had a horrible day, right? What did he shoot today? He shot like eight under. I think.

[A]

Rory did not under or eight over.

[C]

And no, I, I excuse me, eight over, eight under. He'd be in first place.

[A]

Oh, yeah, yeah.

[C]

Eight over. That's what I meant to say. Yeah. So I'm not sure. Rory had a rough day. He ripped that toenail off from that fungus he had. Remember that story last night?

[A]

Scotty Scheffler is that story. Scotty Scheffler's tied for first.

[C]

Oh, I.

[B]

Is he?

[A]

I minus three.

[C]

Oh, he's in. Oh, he's one of the top seven. Then I'm gonna go with Sheffield.

[A]

Well, the leader is tied. Tied, is it? Minus three.

[C]

Yeah. All seven of them. Right? Yeah.

[A]

It starts. So he's tied for first.

[C]

Right. Okay, well, then I'm gonna. What was it? Aldrad Pogata.

[B]

He was in seventh.

[C]

Yeah, he's seventh place. But no, no, he's in first. Yeah, yeah, I'm going with Scotty.

[A]

All right, Very good. All right, Rick Delgado, take us home. What's. What's left?

[B]

All right, Damon, I got a bunch left, but this is all I got time for as 2029. The New York City mayor race is now coming into focus. What?

[D]

What?

[B]

Yes. That early. Didn't they just get a new mayor? Yes, and they already want to replace him as actor and comedian. Michael Rapoport has doubled down and said he will run to replace Zoran Mamdani in a bid to become the new, or the next, I should say, mayor of New York City. Here is cut 14. He's announcing it on Chris Cuomo's show. Cut 14. Check this out.

[A]

Out. Michael Rapoport is thinking about going from public citizen to public servant. Do I have it right? You have it right. I appreciate you having me on, Chris. I am running for mayor of New York City.

[D]

I never thought that I would even

[A]

consider running for mayor of New York City. And I will do it with the best intentions, and I won't do it the way any other political person has ever done it. Your brother, Cuomo, Kung Fu Curtis, Kathy Hochul, Obama, Trump. The only way to beat this guy is to make it and take it. With a New York City street fight mentality, there's no way to out nice him. There's no way to out slick him. I think that he's the greatest bullcrapper in the history of police politicians, and

[D]

that's saying a lot.

[A]

But New York City needs to do something.

[D]

We need to plan right now because

[A]

2029 is around the corner. And yes, I'm running for mayor of New York City, and I will only drop out until I feel like there's somebody who's more qualified that could actually beat Zoron the moron.

[B]

Yeah. So there you have it from from former Trump hater Michael Rapaport, who has decided, you know, what the Trump effect could be could be affecting him as well. And now he's running for office and talking straight.

[A]

All right. As always, we salute our military, active and active police, firefighters, first responders, EMTs, all emergency personnel. Thanks, guys on the show. Vinnie Mac, thanks. Safe trip back to New York. Aaron Frank, great job as always. Most of all, thank you. The live from Studio 6P audience we'll be back tomorrow night, Friday to wrap up the week. What even is that? Nine o' clock tomorrow night. We'll see you then. Eight p.m. right here. Live from Studio 6B,

[B]

Sam.