Loading summary
Transcript42 lines
- [00:00]
Jobab
This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human it's official. AI is officially going to take over anything and everything we know, but there might actually be a silver lining to that. New Yorkers are weighing in right direction, wrong direction under the administration. The numbers are actually pretty shocking. And what could a conservative governor of California actually look like in practice? We will discuss. And of course, in light of recent events, if anything I say lands me in hot water, clearly I am not competent to be held to stand any sort of trial. All that more coming up. Thanks so much for tuning in. My name is jobab. The show starts right now. This might be kind of an out of left field prediction, but the idea that I could be so pervasive it could actually benefit human humanity is one that I think is actually possibly possible. Again, I don't want to put my numbers too high, but there could be a humanity silver lining when AI inevitably takes over any and all software and machinery, which it looks like it's going to do according to the latest non release from AI leader Anthropic. We'll discuss all that and a bunch of other stuff, but but first I got to remind you, tptpsa.com is the email address if you'd like to send along your thoughts, comments, concerns, even criticisms, all are welcome. Tptpusa.com let's see. Oh, if your emails are disgusting, vile, just downright nasty, the chances of us reading them on the show actually increase substantially because that fits in exactly with what we're doing here. Tptpusa.com Like I mentioned at the top, the AI overlords will probably kill us all and drain us of our vital fluids as that is their stated goal. Or at least might be their stated goal when they assume the all powerful capability that several companies are rushing to get them towards. Now is that a good thing? Clearly no. But could there possibly be some good benefits that come out of that? Maybe. Find out what I think about that after we explain the most recent story coming out of Anthropic. Now, the way these AI companies develop, it's not just, you know, chatbots, right? We are all kind of used to grok on X or ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. You ask it a question, it does its thing and it spits out a very, very eloquent and educated response. Generally speaking, we can argue over left or right centered response. What are those responses? Are they accurate? Okay, the bottom line is AI is way, way, way more than the chat bots that we all interface with. The way these companies generally Work is they have different models, different softwares, effectively. And again, I'm not a tech nerd, so if you are, and I miss pronouncing or labeling what these things are, know that I'm getting the gist of it correctly. They effectively have different models that they use. And when there's a step up in performance, the, you know, the model steps up. As, you know, generally things do when you go on a higher trim of the car, it's, you know, kind of the same car, but now it's got a leather interior and heated front seats and a push to start instead of having to turn a key. You get the premise. Well, the most recent iteration of Anthropics, Claude, is apparently too good. They're releasing a, or we're going to release an update or a new module called Mythos, which is unfortunately so good that it's creating problems. Now, to get ahead of these problems, Anthropic put out this video with their CEO. But a bunch of other people who were involved in Mythos trying to quell the concern that we all probably have. Because of course, my biggest fear is the AI overlords taking me and draining me of my vital fluids for whatever it is that the purpose of whatever purpose they feel they deem is necessary. But here's a cut of the video that they put out talking about their newest iteration of AI mania, called mythos. This is cut 15.
- [04:30]
Anthropic AI Specialist
We haven't trained it specifically to be good at cyber. We trained it to be good at code. But as a side effect of being good at code, it's also good at cyber.
- [04:39]
Jobab
The model that we're experimenting with is by and large as good as a
- [04:45]
Anthropic AI Specialist
professional human identifying bugs.
- [04:48]
Jobab
It's good for us because we can find more vulnerabilities sooner and we can fix them. So the main point is it's really, really, really good, which means it's scary good. Which is interesting that they chose the happy, fun corporate music to go underneath it. Hey, we're announcing this very, very scary thing that could end up dominating any and all technology. Let's put a lighthearted jivey music underneath it to maybe, I don't know, blunt the dramatic trauma that this may cause. Now, the goal for this Mythos, or at least one of the goals, is to find any sort of bugs, find any sort of holes in software or operating systems or technology and fix those bugs and fix those holes without humans having to go through and solve the problems. The problem is, the company says the module could unfortunately enable catastrophic cyber attacks, even terror related harm. If it is misused, well, that matters because Anthropic says that if this falls into the wrong hands, those bad actors could target critical infrastructure. Electrical grids, power plants, water treatment facilities, hospitals. And that that clearly would be bad. Now, before we get to how they've responded to the negatives of this new Mythos module, how it does it is actually pretty interesting. What they stated in the video, which we don't have time to play, is that it basically just does a string of different things. In other words, if something has a cyber security where they've got a fence and then past the fence they've got a moat and. And then past the moat they've got a drawbridge and then the drawbridge and then the walls of the castle and then the inside. What it does is it strings together all of the different defects and the bugs to put together one big cohesive map of how to break the system, which again, is good if you're trying to find those holes, but bad if you are vulnerable to those holes being exploited. So because it's so powerful, we what has Anthropic decided to do with their new Mythos system thing?
- [07:09]
Anthropic AI Specialist
Cut 16 we noticed that this model is very autonomous. It's just generally better at pursuing really long range tasks that are kind of like the tasks that a human security researcher would do throughout the course of an entire day. Obviously, capabilities in a model like this could do harm if in the wrong hand. And so we won't be releasing this model widely. More powerful models are going to come from us and from others. And so we do need a plan to respond to this. That's why we're launching what we're calling Project Glasswing, where we partner with a number of the organizations that power some of the world's most critical code to put the model into their hands, to allow them to look at how they can use models like this to bring down risk and protect everyone.
- [07:55]
Jobab
The bottom line is they're not going to release it to the public because they fear that it's too powerful. Well, here's several problems that the layperson could point out. Well, some people are going to have it. They're not going to release it publicly to everybody. But Anthropic says the glass wing will involve about 40 different companies who get early access. Companies like Amazon, Google, Apple, Nvidia, CrowdStrike, JP Morgan Chase, some examples of the participants. But one of the problems that I have is the very end of that video where the guy talking says, well, it's going to protect everyone. Where Have I heard that one before? Two weeks to slow the curb, wear a mask. Social distancing. All of the things that were designed to protect everyone. The problem is the same thing we saw during COVID although these are entirely separate instances. Some people exploit the idea of protecting everyone, even if some people are genuinely doing it, even if most people are genuinely doing it. To quote, unquote, protect everyone. How many people does it take for it to leak? Again, not really knowing anything about this. If it's a computer program, probably one. And if there's massive value on the black market, I think the incentive for that one person, if you know that can be done by that one person to leak it is extremely high. The money would be outrageous for anybody who does want to leak it to a bad actor, I. E. I don't know, China or, or the Russians, or literally any other adversary of the United States of America. Anthropic claims that its mythos has already identified thousands of high severity vulnerabilities, including some in every operating system and web browser. Which is bad. Again, good thing that it's being identified, but bad thing if you're like me, skeptical of the ability for it to be reigned in by individuals who may have motivations past the top of line. Moral, virtuous, righteous thing to do. Well, just how powerful is it? The video continued on to example, give examples of how powerful this thing can be. Cut 17 I found more bugs in
- [10:34]
Cybersecurity Expert
the last couple of weeks than I found in the rest of my life combined. We've used the model to scan a bunch of open source code and the the thing that we went for first was operating systems because this is the code that underlies the entire Internet infrastructure for OpenBSD. We found a bug that's been present for 27 years where I can send a couple of pieces of Data to any OpenBSD server and crash it. On Linux we found a number of vulnerabilities where as a user with no permissions, I can elevate myself to the administrator by just running some binary on my machine.
- [11:13]
Jobab
Oh, great. This guy who's. I guess his whole goal is to find bugs. I found more bugs in the last couple weeks than I've done my entire career. Oh, well, the good thing is there's jaunty jivey music underneath it, so it doesn't sound as bad. Oh, the good thing is I found this bug that's been in there for 27 years. Oh, the good thing is I was able to, as a regular user, elevate myself to an administrator on this operating system. Oh, this is just fantastic. Except for the fact that it's not. Look, we can make three pretty easy assumptions in this particular case. Assumption one is that this is only going to get better. Right. This is not going to, like, deteriorate in any way, shape or form. The ability for people to do whatever they want, either close vulnerabilities or in the cynical perspective, exploit those vulnerabilities. It's not going to get less, it's going to get more. The second assumption we can make is you're not going to be able to contain it. Yes. You want to limit the ability to access it to these 40 companies from the start. Yeah, sure, fine. Guaranteed, at some point in time this will leak to the general public. And unfortunately the assumption can be made, which is. The third assumption is that it will leak to somebody who is capable. The most capable versions of this will leak to somebody who's willing to do it, use it for evil. Those three things I think can be assumed. It's going to get better, it's going to leak, and somebody's going to want to use it for bad. Now, I mentioned at the beginning part of this might be kind of a silver lining. And you at home might be thinking, where is the silver lining here, dude? This, this is all very, very, very bad. Which may actually be the silver lining itself because AI is being praised and feared for its ability and its capability. But what if because of stuff like this and because there are bad actors in the world, we no longer trust it? What if that is the ultimate conclusion of all of this, is that AI is able to do anything and everything except gain the trust of humans, which is the whole purpose for it to begin with. In a world of pure efficiency, humans are being replaced by more and more capable robots. Right now we, we have like a general trust of the machines that are used in our everyday life. If you go to the grocery store and you buy a loaf of bread, chances are that bread is mass produced and it's mass produced using machines. And those machines are automated by systems that this AI can effectively override. Now. Right. Like I said, we have trust of those systems at the moment. But if these things become overwhelming and they're put in the hands of bad actors, how much more are we going to trust those machines? Personally, kind of none. And then what if the erosion of trust in automation leads to the reversion of necessity for craftsmanship? What I mean by that is, if I don't trust the machine that, you know, throws 90 take the Maha stuff out of the equation for the moment throws 90 different ingredients, several of which I don't, I can't pronounce. But it really only takes an increase of one of those small in pronounceable ingredients to ruin the whole batch. Make everybody in the town sick. If I can't trust that machine because of AI like this, which is supposed to make things better, but in the bat, in the hands of a bad actor can make things very, very worse. Am I going to buy that loaf of bread? Probably not. What am I going to do? Well, I got to eat. So it might very well be that the mistrust in the automation leads me to an artisan, a bakery, where it's human to human, Hey, I know the person that baked this bread. I know that they sourced their ingredients from people who aren't out to kill me. And therefore I have a human to human connection. What if the AI gets so good at one, closing holes, but two exploiting holes that we just can't trust any of the machines. And like said, will that make life a little bit more difficult? Maybe, but it also, if we're going to find a silver lining, if we're going to be a little bit optimistic, might encourage more human to human reaction, maybe not even encourage it, but necessitate it. Maybe at some point you can't trust the water treatment facility to be run by a computer for all of the reasons that I'm sure you can draw yourself. Maybe you have to have physical humans there that you trust and you effectively buy that trust with dollars. That's why that's what jobs are. And now instead of having a machine have to open, you know, all six of the valves, you got two guys that are cranking it manually like we've done for the last hundred years, saved the last 20 where machines have been more and more prevalent. What I'm saying is this, it's very, very possible in my mind, if I'm thinking of the long term trajectory here, that this stuff gets so incredibly powerful that yeah, it eliminates the needs for humans if it were solely aligned with the betterment of humans. But if that's not the case and this sort of stuff falls into the wrong hands, how can we trust any of the machines? And if we can't trust any of the machines because they're run by software and potentially vulnerable to AI attacks by, by bad actors, then maybe the only answer is to revert back to human to human connection. Maybe the only way to get past the AI absorption of really every single capability is do everything ourselves and honestly, does that sound that bad? Not really. It doesn't sound super bad. And again, I use the bakery example as 1 but but of many, many different things. Going to a local bakery to buy a fresh loaf of bread from people that I trust in my community as opposed to a mass factory that outputs to everywhere doesn't sound all that bad. Yeah, I guess will like the big money manufacturing kind of go by the wayside in this scenario? Yes. But if more mom and pop stores open up because trust is required acquired in the age of untrustable AI technology and machines, is that a bad thing? I actually don't think so. I actually think it might be exactly what we need. But again, it's either that or the AI kills us all and drains us of our vital fluids. One of those two options seems most probable, at least to me. What do you think? Tptposa.com is the email address. If you'd like to send send along your thoughts, comments, concerns, criticisms. Does this freak you out beyond belief or does it, I don't know, give you hope that smaller, more close knit communities around economic availability will develop, which may be a good thing? Let us know tbt tpusa.com love to hear any of your thoughts. Got a lot of stuff to come up to. A little bit more. Well, some depressing, actually, it's all still depressing. I'm just going to fair warning here. The next segment, getting to the point is a little bit depressing, but not all of it. So have hope. Tptpc.com is the email address. We'll be right back after the break. Don't go away.
- [19:39]
Religious Commentator 1
The church with the homosexual flag. They think the greatest sin is judging. They'll say, well, Jesus says do not judge. The Bible does not say that.
- [19:47]
Religious Commentator 2
Agreed.
- [19:48]
Religious Commentator 1
Jesus says do not judge lest you not be judged. Oh, hypocrite. Which by the way, is a judgment. Jesus was telling us how to judge, not not to judge. It is one of the misquoted, most misunderstood scriptures.
- [20:01]
Jobab
He also, and I know this is a very short clip, I'm sure he probably expanded greatly to that. But also there's you don't. You can't judge the heart of somebody. That that is up to God. You can criticize the actions of people because, well that's. And don't have time to get into a whole theological discussion about this. But yeah, the point being made is how to judge the actions of people. But you can never judge the hearts of an individual. That's again up to God and that's the one that lives like to throw in people's faces or you can't judge me like you're doing something that's objectively bad for not only you, but everybody else. So we can curb that behavior as a society if we so choose. Again, short of a longer theological discussion, I think that's a great point Charlie made. All right. Hey, when we have points to get to, well, we got to get to them. It's time to get to the point. Get to the point. Get to the point. During that little zinger, I took a swig of some coffee that's been sitting on my desk since yesterday. That was a poor decision. Just so you know, in case there is some adverse reaction physically on the screen. That's, that's what, that's what happens behind the scenes here on the show. When you've got zingers, I generally am taking a swig of something. Turns out it was a day old coffee with dairy in it. And it was, it was, it was not a good idea. But enough of behind the scenes time to get to the actual point. We already played the zinger, so let's get to the first point. I already warned you this is going to be depressing, this from Breitbart, but this is being reported pretty much everywhere. The suspect behind the Irina Zarutska murder, incapable to proceed to trial. The Ukrainian refugee who was stabbed to death on a North Carolina train. Unfortunately, you probably have all seen the video. It's horrendous and terrible. Decarlos Brown Jr. Was arrested again, and not again for this particular crime, just again in general. 14 prior charges such as armed robbery, 5 year prison sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon. He was found incapable to proceed to trial based on psychiatric evaluation conducted conducted by the Central Regional Hospital there in North Carolina. To which I would say, and I understand, I understand the dangers. I know my libertarian friends are screaming at the tv say, if you're not capable to stand trial, are you capable, especially with a criminal past, of being amongst the population? That is the question that we should all be asking. And is it a difficult question to wrestle with, especially when it comes to the freedoms of the individual? Yes, it is. But it also is necessary. We are not a serious society if we can't tackle these sorts of issues. If somebody who I think I still have to legally say allegedly because it's not settled case at this point, clearly from the video, stabbed a person for no reason. If that person is incapable of standing trial, they should also be incapable of being released to the public after the prior Convictions again, difficult, difficult. I again know my libertarian friends are screaming at the screen right now, but necessary as a conversation to have when it comes to protecting the overall populace. Let's see further under further psychiatric examination is going to be undergone in his federal case. So, you know, there's still, there's still some amount of hope that justice will be served here in this particular case. But overall, that I think is the main takeaway. Can we as a society come to a conclusion of what we do with people who are criminally insane? Uh, I obviously have my opinions and I'm sure you know those. All right, point number two is that I don't know, I don't know if this, well, this, this is depressing. Ish. I, I, I'm not trying to promise depressing headlines. I'm just saying this is the general vibe of the headlines today. Cash strapped USPS suspends pension contributions. If you don't know this, the United States Postal Service is deemed necessary by the government. Now in the modern age of Internet connectivity, not entirely sure if that still holds, but it still is deemed, quote unquote, necessary. And because it's necessary, they are able to lose a bajillion dollars every single year. That for some reason. FedEx, UPS, DHL, Amazon, none of these companies lose money when they're shipping packages. But the United States Postal Service, geez, there they just hemorrhage money. Probably a lot of that is due to the. Some of you are going to get upset about this because I'm sure you worked for usps. I'm not talking about you specifically, it's just the broader organization as a whole, probably because of the lavish government pensions that are afforded to those who work for the U.S. pension Service. The cash strapped U.S. postal Service announced Thursday that it will temporarily suspend its employer pension pension contributions to defined benefit portions of the Federal Employees Retirement System effective Friday, stopping $200 million of payments every other week. To which I say, holy cow, there are $200 million every other week. This is one of those two where, man, it's tough, it's tough to be critical here because I know that it's going to offend some people. But this, this feels like teachers, especially in California, the adage of teachers don't get paid enough. Where do you. Maybe that's not the case where you live in California. I get in big trouble for it is going to get clipped up and going to be a big old big old problem. But it's just factually true. Specifically in California, teachers are grossly overpaid when you look at all of what they earn throughout the course of the year, given three months off and the pension that they get, it's unbelievable. Like people, it is so far above the like average salary of even a household. It's, it's crazy. All of that is to say is that in a lot of cases government employees, especially in blue states make way too much money, especially on the back end, pension end. Yeah, you're. I guess the idea originally when this first started was well you're giving up a life in the private sector to public service in the, in the government sector and therefore we need to entice people by lavish pensions. Well that, that's, that's gone now. It's just a very, very high paying job. Again, not all places you may be in like Mississippi or Louisiana, one of those places where teachers don't make all that much money but I guarantee you in California teachers are just, they make so much money while they're working and then they don't have to save any of it because their pension is unbelievable as well. Wasn't expecting to go on a rant against the teachers unions which again that's what this is. It's not against teachers if you're a teacher in the public school system in California. God bless you, especially if you're watching this show. But the teachers unions have negotiated the consistent screwing of the taxpayer in many ways. Bottom line, the agency has been in financial trouble reporting net losses of about $118 billion since 2007, which. This is the back to the USPS. What I just wonder how FedEx and UPS and DHL all managed to scrape by without losing hundreds of billions of dollars. Okay, speaking of California, one of the things that could potentially write the ship is is this. The LA Times interestingly had a really, really fun piece here especially because the LA Times is not at all a conservative news outlet. Had this article Revolution or chaos? The massive stakes if a conservative becomes California's governor. If you don't know this, there are two conservative California's. The top two we've talked about a number of times in the show. California is a top two system. So the top two vote getters in the primary go on. Doesn't matter if they're both Republicans, both Democrats, doesn't matter. Top two go on. Now the goal of that as well, let's just expense with having a conservative on the ballot at all. Let's just have it. Two libs fighting out for lib progressive supremacy that actually might blow back in their faces because there Are so many libs in on the concert on the Governor's side that there might actually be the top two vote getters be conservatives now the LA Times is trying to stoke fears with this they say the experts warn that conservative governor would wield significant executive powers including budget line item vetoes, appointments, emergency declarations, but would face enormous pushback and gridlock due to the state's super majorities in both houses. Could also be chaotic with the lib controlled legislature, Attorney General, the state Supreme Court. All of those things could be massive problems which leads to the headline Revolution or Chaos? To which I would respond as a semi student of history. Generally speaking it kind of comes with both, right?
- [30:03]
Cybersecurity Expert
Both.
- [30:04]
Jobab
The revolution kind of comes with the chaos and the chaos sometimes prompts the revolution which is probably what is needed in California. Obviously we don't want chaos in terms of violence in the streets, but legislative chaos is this is maybe, maybe necessary when it comes to reviving and hopefully revolting politically speaking in the state of corruptifornia. Sorry California. Yeah, Geez. Talked a lot about the I teased this at the beginning so we might as well pay it off. We'll pay it off really quickly. This will be our last get to the point here even though we've got several the one that we keep bumping Producer Glenn is upset about because it's been on the docket for the last several days and it is very important but just there's too much to talk about so we'll pay this off very quickly. This from the New York Post Majority of voters in NYC say that they're on the wrong track under Mam Zordani whatever his name is. I'm not entirely sure. According to a new poll, an Emerson College poll of 850 New York City voters found that 59% believe the city is in the wrong going on the wrong track during Mam Zor Danny's first hundred days in office, while only 41% say it's headed in the right direction. Comes as a shock to no one, right? Of all the things running through my head, the deep analysis who, who could have seen this coming? Literally freaking anybody. So that's that. That's all the analysis that is necessary here. Coming up after the break, we're going to decide some official business or dig ourselves into some official business. Which official business, if you don't know, is when officials state their business making it official business, which is what we call official business. TBT tpusa.com if you have any thoughts on this Angry emails By the way Are you a California teacher who I just said is probably overpaid? Specifically in California. Specifically. Because the state is beholden to the mob that is the teachers union. If you're angry about that, let us know. Tptbusa.com we'll be right back after the break. Don't go away. But it's not a child, it's a fetus. And like, I don't think any of us remember being in the womb, you know, so you wouldn't even know.
- [32:34]
Debate Participant
Like, do you remember when you were one?
- [32:38]
Jobab
No.
- [32:39]
Debate Participant
Was it okay to kill you when you were one?
- [32:42]
Canadian Member of Parliament
No, but I killed could. Like if I had endured trauma at
- [32:45]
Jobab
1 years old, I probably would have remembered it.
- [32:48]
Debate Participant
But then. So you would. You, you would be more valuable if you had experienced trauma?
- [32:56]
Jobab
I don't think so.
- [32:57]
Debate Participant
Now I'm just saying, like the, the. Just the logical cascade there. It's like this abortion is okay because they wouldn't remember it. And then I brought up, did you remember being one?
- [33:08]
Jobab
No.
- [33:10]
Debate Participant
But if you experience trauma, you'd remember it. So if you experience trauma, you would be able to remember it. And being able to remember things is what brings you value.
- [33:18]
Jobab
But I don't think you remember anything past, like before.
- [33:22]
Debate Participant
Yeah. I'm just saying our ability to remember things is not where we get our rights.
- [33:29]
Jobab
I mean, obvious point, I don't know if I have to add anything to that. Yeah, clearly the way that libs choose to delineate what type of person, what age of person have or don't have value is always unbelievable to me. It's crazy that you think, well, you're not, you're not a person if you're, if you can't remember anything. Also, the dumbest people among us should be able to vote. And I say that meaning they're trying to like lower the voting age, like 14, which, you know, no offense to 14, 15, 16, 17 year olds. You got a little more life to. To learn. Um, and the right to vote is not the same as the right to life. It's, it's the arguments. Just, I don't know, bring some better arguments. Libs. Wow.
- [34:22]
Anthropic AI Specialist
Where were we?
- [34:22]
Jobab
Oh, it's official business time. Hey, I. This is my favorite part of the show because we get to make fun of elected officials generally, libs, when they speak on their official platforms, because then it makes it official business. First up in official business is Timu Obama, also known as Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, the minority leader in the House of Representatives. And I only include that to say this is not Some putz, right? This is like the top. He's the new Nancy Pelosi, although significantly dumber. And that's not to say I agree with Nancy Pelosi at all. I'm just saying she was a smart person and unfortunately accomplished a lot of things. So Hakeem Jeffries is Nancy. Nancy. Hakeem Jeffries is. Is his new title officially deemed by me. Here he is talking about DEI in the military and why we need to prioritize diversity by race for some reason, which makes you a racist instead of merit. Cut six.
- [35:27]
Hakeem Jeffries
And when you attack diversity, equity and inclusion, you attack the United States of America. We have the high ground on this issue, which is why I'm so thankful that Reverend Sharpton and the National Action Network continues to lean in. And here's the other thing that we know that this effort attacking deep dei, it's not a serious effort. It's not about celebrating merit. That's what they tell you. They're not trying to celebrate merit. They're trying to elevate mediocrity. Here's how we know that's the case. Just look at who they put in charge of the attack on dei. Pete Hegseth, the most unqualified Secretary of the Defense in American history. You don't have the standing to lecture anyone. This guy can't organize a two car funeral.
- [36:24]
Jobab
I mean, do we even need to, like, criticize what he said? Because what he says is just so objectively, factually wrong. Pete Heath couldn't organize a two car funeral. First of all, the saying is two car parade. Second of all, he's not the Defense Secretary, he's the war secretary. Third of all, according to pretty much everybody, the strikes on Iran. Agree with them or not, the rescues that we've been able to accomplish in Iran are unbelievable in terms of coordination. And Pete Segseth is the top guy there. Also, his accolades prior to any actual military action as the Secretary of War are also pretty impressive. So I'm not sure what you're talking about, Hakeem. Uh, but yeah, you're right. We should prioritize. Let's make sure. Let. Let's not look at any other qualifiers. Just black guy, black girl, white guy, white girl. Let's make sure we have all the same amounts, because that's what matters, you know, not military preparedness, more minorities. That's what we should focus on and prioritize. What a dumb thing to say. He didn't even. He also couldn't get DEI out of his mouth correctly or succinctly. He's the. The. The D D I D I D E I which was not an issue for this Canadian mp. Now generally speaking, official business is usually relegated to United States officials and United States bureaucrats. But in this particular instance, this was so unbelievable that we had to bring into official business a Canadian official in which she. This is both horrifying and impressive. I'm just gonna play the clip.
- [38:12]
Canadian Member of Parliament
Cut seven when the budget was released, I was shocked to find out that Prime Minister Carney is cutting $7 billion between Indigenous Services Canada and Crown Indigenous Relations. They provided $0 to deal with the ongoing genocide of MMIW G2SLGBTQIA plus this is abhorrent. This is callous. This is callous because the very liberal government that has stripped organizations of life sustaining funding.
- [38:46]
Jobab
Now I'm going to producer Glenn, I'm going to hold this screen here for a second because that was unbelievable. Now you may have not seen a shock on my face because I've watched this video several times, but yeah, you may at home be shocked. What did she say? The genocide of what? First of all, it sounds like when we're talking about the LGBTQ+ thing, at a certain point it just encompasses every. How are there two letters of the same. How are they two of the same letters? Like what is the. At a certain point you're just reciting PI 3.14. What who isn't encompassed in the Plus. Now the reason I wanted to stay on this because we're going to do a show first here. I'm going to try, I'm going to make an attempt. I have it on the screen here where it is hor we just discussed why it's horrifying. Where it's impressive is the ability to get all of that out. I think of when Justin Trudeau, the lgbt. The lgbtq, if you remember that clip. Great. I probably should have had that here. But it's just. It reminds me of that clip. The impressive part is being able to get all of that out. Unlike Hakeem Jeffries with DEI in one very, very smooth objective. So I with the letters on my screen, I'm going to attempt to to say it at the same time as this they them and see how it goes. Okay, ready? We're going to do it together.
- [40:20]
Canadian Member of Parliament
Relations. They provided $0 to deal with the ongoing genocide of Mmiwe plus.
- [40:30]
Jobab
I didn't even get.
- [40:30]
Canadian Member of Parliament
This is abhorrent. This is callous.
- [40:33]
Jobab
I didn't even get the first three letters. Mm I w g 2 sl g b t q q I a plus what are the two cues? Honest to God, this is. This is not satire. This is a real person with political power. Mmi w g if you can do it. Tptbusa.com I want to see videos. If you guys can send. I know that we've never done this sort of thing. We've never asked for this sort of thing, but I would like to see a video of somebody trying to get it out as clearly as this. They them right here. I don't know if it's even possible. MMI wg2s2lgbtq help. I can't even do it slow. Well, that's, you know, because we rewatched this, we don't have a ton of time to get to much else. But I would like emails. TPTP USA.com maybe we should make that our maybe producer. Maybe we'll task producer Glenn with making that the email. The email is mm I G W2LGBTQ2+@TBSA.com but it's not. TPTBOSA.com is the email address. We'll be right back after the break with a. Oh, geez. More ragging on Californians. Yeah, you hate to see that. Don't go away. We'll be right back.
- [42:03]
Religious Commentator 2
The two were running together, but the other disciple outran Peter. What? And reached the tomb first. John, why are you writing that for the other disciple? Yeah, John, you could just say your name. People know it's whom Jesus loved. Okay, we get it. Reached the tomb first. But John, why do you need to mention you're fast? Because it's accurate, Peter. John, I'm an old man. Of course you're going to beat me there. Why are you trying to flesh? Do you want me to bear false witness? I can't lie, Peter. I got there first. Just say we got there together. Did I get there first? It doesn't matter. Did I get there first? John, I got there right after you. I got to the tomb first. Are you going to deny this as well, Peter? John, I got there right after. You don't need to go there, Peter. Listen, you're the rock. You're slower. I got to the tomb first. Let me just write that. Why does it matter? Because the people need to know. Need to know what, John? That I'm faster than you and I got to the tomb first.
- [42:44]
Jobab
That has always been one of the funniest verses. I think there's no reason. There's no, like, theological reason to include that. But just John was fast. You got to the. I Don't know why I'm saying it in an Australian accent. Very funny. Like, I'm liking the Bible humor. That, that's always, that's always good and welcome. All right, hey, it's Thursday and limited amount of time, so let's get to it right off the bat. It's the Thursday Tribunal or Justice Thursday Tribunal. Justice Thursday. As you can see, appropriately, I'm depicted as a judge, but I also in this case am the prosecutor, the jury and the judge and the executioner if needed, if that's what the judge deems as a, an appropriate sentence for the crimes committed by whoever hears a hero on trial. First of all, I've got to choose to indict. This article is from the San Francisco Gate, a California publication talking about California. California. This headline, california made them rich on paper and now they're stuck in place. Lots of homeowners across California feel locked in to their housing situation this entire article, and unfortunately, we're probably gonna leave almost zero time for mailbag. This entire article is complaining that California real estate prices have gone up just too much. Now, in California, that doesn't mean your property taxes go up. That means your. The value that you now have in that house, the equity you have in that house is a lot, which, if you're any sort of investor, is a good thing. But oh no, it's disastrous because these Californians who consistently vote for more progressive government, which generally means more taxes, are gonna owe taxes. I kid you not, this entire article is saying things like, well, yes, the houses in California have quadrupled in value, but, well, they can't sell it because they'll have to pay capital gains tax, as you would on any sort of stock. Right? If your home quadruples in value over the course of 20 years, which is the example that they gave in the article, it's like 8% every single year, which is a pretty dang good investment. Yeah, if it were in stocks, you would have to pay capital gains. But oh no, the poor libs in California, their houses are just. They've made them so wealthy that, well, they can't leave because if they left, they would have to pay the very taxes that they freaking voted for. I'm very passionate about this, especially as a guy in California who has a lot of friends who can't, because of a lot of different reasons, afford to buy homes in this state. And now the homeowners that have been made crazy wealthy feel stuck. Oh, boo hoo, sell the house, pay the taxes that you freaking voted for and move on with your life with your millions of dollars after taxes. You don't get a break from me. So yes, I, I am choosing to prosecute these people for whininess and irritation on my behalf. I'm irritated with them and their stupid complaints. I also asked the jury find them guilty and, and as the judge, I sentenced them to having to live in California. This article specifically talks about some couple that bought their home in San Francisco in the Bay Area and over the last 20 years their, their home is quadrupled in value and if they move they would have to pay capital gains tax. Yeah, they would also receive the upside of literally millions of dollars after the taxes. But they just, they feel stuck. So you know what? I sentence you to having to live in that stuckness. Boo hoo. With your million dollar houses. This article also says real estate tax attorney says owners of $3 million homes could face a $500,000 in tax liabilities. Freaking. That's your own fault. You voted for that.
- [46:55]
Hakeem Jeffries
Go.
- [46:55]
Jobab
This makes me so irritated. Justice Thursday. I believe justice is served. I sentenced them to having to live in this godforsaken hellhole that they created in their million dollar houses. All right. TBT tbsa.com mailbag right after the break. Don't go away. All right. Due to a lack of time, we're not gonna, we're gonna skip the comeback clip today. We're gonna go straight in to the emails. You know, of course we have suggestions on how to. We did the whole first segment yesterday on Mum Dunny's which again, whose name I have no idea how to pronounce. Some suggestions on how to pronounce that. Mark has a comment on NYC says the silly celebration should take, should take precedence. Yeah, that's that. They're also true. If you're going to decide between the World cup and the city's the celebration of the country, go ahead and prioritize the celebration of the country. We're better than the World cup. Except for in soccer. We're not good at soccer. But also I feel like there's a certain amount of Americanness that necessitates being bad at soccer. Hey, we have real sports that involve contact and entertainment, not some dudes kicking a ball around for an hour and a half to end up 00. Nobody wants to watch that. There's a certain American quality to not liking soccer. But anyways, he also goes on to give me a suggestion. Zorko Dorco Manchaser how you pronounce the mayor New York City's name. You know that was a little far fetched. I'll be honest with you Mark. I appreciate the suggestion. I'm not entirely sure how, how, how possible that is to work in to our system. Another viewer name not exactly known. Man Dummy. I think that one's been suggested. I do like that one. Let's see. Stacy suggests ma' am. Man Commie. I like that one. I like that one too. Let's see. Oh, Sheldon, frequent correspondent. Often like Sheldon's emails asking do I actually play the guitar behind me or is it a prop? You know, when designing the set we kind of put, put some little Easter eggs. You see right next to that is a picture of George Washington. Plate of George Washington painting. But the guitar behind me. Yes and no. I do play the guitar quite frequently by the way. I enjoy playing the guitar both acoustic and electric. But that is a nylon guitar that I picked up at a thrift store I think for like 30 bucks. I don't play that one specifically. So the answer to your question, yes or no? Yes and no. That's going to do it for us here on the show today. We'll see you tomorrow, same time, same place. Tptp USA.com God bless America. This is an I heart podcast. Guaranteed human.