Loading summary
Transcript46 lines
- [00:00]
A
This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.
- [00:05]
B
If you're an H Vac technician and a call comes in, Grainger knows that you need a partner that helps you find the right product fast and hassle free. And you know that when the first problem of the day is a clanking blower motor, there's no need to break a sweat. With Grainger's easy to use website and product details, you're confident you'll soon have everything humming right along. Call 1-800-GRAINGER click granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.
- [00:35]
C
President Trump slams those globalist Commie Euros to their face. Also, the UK is looking at using AI to do all of their policing before the crimes happen. While that doesn't sound dystopian at all. And also Virginia, one of these states that is now led entirely by Blue Libs, one of which, who wants to kill a bunch of conservatives, has some crazy things on its legislative docket. That and more coming up. My name is Joe Bob. Thanks so much for tuning in. The show starts right now. President Trump went to Davos, is in Davos right now as we're speaking and just laid the wood to bunch of those lib commie globalists at the World Economic Flu Forum, which is just so delicious to see. We played a couple of clips yesterday from some people in the Trump cabinet. Lutnick was there, Bessant was there again, just eviscerating all of their globalist ideas and then big Donald Trump shows up and just tells them all to pound sand. Now we do have a couple clips from that, but there are some really interesting intricacies going on there at the World Economic Forum before Trump came, after Trump came and and the fallout out of that. Remember, you can always email the show anytime you want. Tptpusa.com Let us know what you thought of President Trump's Davos World Economic Forum speech. Interestingly enough, we're gonna get some reaction from Gavin Newsom himself via video. We're not talking to him, but you can also send your reactions tptp USA.com or leave a comment wherever it is that you are watching. And remember if those emails and comment comments are bigoted, just disgusting, awful and terrible, they'd actually fit in right here on the show. So we may actually read them in our mailbag segment. TPT.com now we did to start this off, we got some exclusive never before seen video of President Trump at Davos. There is video that's been floating around, clips of him talking and Saying all of the things that we want him to say in America's best interest. America first. But I don't think anybody has actually seen this clips, or that's at least what Producer Glenn is telling me. Um, this is. This is President Trump telling all of those commie Euros at Davos or those globalists exactly what he thinks. Cut six, you win. You have a problem with that?
- [02:58]
A
You know what you should do?
- [02:59]
C
You should sanction me. Sanction me with your army. Oh, wait a minute. You don't have an army. I guess that means you need to shut the up. That's what I do. If I don't have no army, I would sh up.
- [03:11]
A
Shut the up. That's right.
- [03:15]
C
I mean, that sounds like Trump, but it doesn't. It doesn't quite look like Trump. Producer Glenn is nodding. Yeah, that. That, that actually was President Trump earlier on in the day telling all of those Euros, if you have a problem, shut the hell up. You don't have an army to enforce any of the things that you're talking about against whatever the United States is doing itself. Now get to a little bit more serious fair. President Trump, like I've mentioned a number of times, already, took it to those commie globalist Euros. Um, we're gonna play some of the clips, but also some of the. The reaction here is President Trump talking about just more broadly, what the United States is doing, but specifically around Greenland. Um, watch this clip. We will discuss, and then we'll talk about what the other leaders of those globalist common Euro countries are saying in response to it. This is cut 7.
- [04:05]
A
And then after the war, which we won, we won it big. Without us right now, you'd all be speaking German and little Japanese. Perhaps after the war, we gave Greenland back to Denmark. How stupid were we to do that? But we did it. But we gave it back. But how ungrateful are they now?
- [04:32]
C
Yeah, the. He also went on to mention that the Canadian Prime Minister, also pretty ungrateful considering the golden dome will also protect Canada. Um, but what's really interesting here is I think this kind of displays the broader tactical brilliance of Donald Trump in the speech. He goes on to take military action of taking Greenland off the table, which, honestly, I was kind of upset about. I was kind of hoping that we would land Marines on the beaches in. In Greenland and just take it over by force. But unfortunately, the President. Yeah, we're not gonna do that. We're gonna be diplomatic about it. We're gonna look for a way that the United States can control Greenland. But he also didn't back off the fact that yes, we are going to control Greenland, where I think that that is strategic messaging, tactical brilliance on Trump's part. I don't think, I don't think military invasion of Greenland was ever on the table and it got the entire world literally to talk about it and not only talk about Greenland and the United States interest in taking Greenland, but, but also talk about their own defenses because that of course comes up if President Trump at, at a certain point doesn't take off military intervention in Greenland off the table. Like, like, like it said France sent troops in last week to Greenland to protect it from a U. S. Invasion, which made everybody look at France and go, you guys really? And then pretty much happened to all of the other euro countries. It made it so that one, people were talking about Greenland, but two also put pressure on all of these countries that said, well, we're going to invoke Article 5 to go, okay, well do you actually have the capacity to do that? Because it requires, you know, NATO requires 2% GDP spent on military spending every single year. The United States does about four, which is, you know, double what everybody else does. So it brought attention to Greenland and also brought attention to the fact that a bunch of the other NATO allies aren't going to doing their part. Now, what's interesting about the politics around this is how some of the foreign leaders are talking about their own military. If the United States is entirely removed. Again, Donald Trump said, no, we're not going to invade Greenland effectively. And even, even after he said that, a bunch of people were still taking the tact of, well, we can support ourselves militarily without the United States, including one of Trump's friends, Alexander Stubb, who is the prime minister, leader, president, I don't know how their government works. He's the guy at the top of the political food chain over there in Finland was posed the question on a panel, hey, can you defend yourselves without the United States? The answer is ironic and deliciously hilarious. This is the leader of Finland, Alexander Stubb.
- [07:18]
D
Clip 8 First is a direct answer to the question of this panel. Can Europe defend itself? My answer is unequivocally yes, without the American style, without the Americas. I mean, how.
- [07:29]
A
Look, but you're relying on them for these key elements. How would you, how would you do.
- [07:33]
C
It at scale and at duration and.
- [07:35]
D
At intensity with an assumption that the United States would cut off completely any kind of work? Well, if we look at the defence composure of Europe, by and large, in a country like Finland, so How do we do it? We have conscription. One million have done it. We can mobilize 280,000 soldiers within weeks. We have 62 F18s. Your next question is going to be, do they fly without Americans? No, they don't. But do we trust that they will continue to fly because it's in the interest of America to do so? Yes.
- [08:07]
C
He then goes on to say, list all of the other things that he's also reliant on the United States for. First of all, he starts that off by saying, we can unequivocally defend ourselves without the United States of America.
- [08:20]
A
And.
- [08:20]
C
And then he goes, because of conscription. Oh, okay.
- [08:25]
A
Dude.
- [08:26]
C
How's that conscription going to work amongst your people? How did it go with Russia in their Ukraine invasion? Not super well. I'm not entirely sure that that's the best answer. And then also, you know, you want to talk about conscription, where's the training involved there? Are all of those people going to be trained and war ready immediately? My guess is probably not. And then it gets into the most ironic part. Yeah, we don't need. We can unequivocally defend ourselves without the United States of America, so long as the United States of America helps us out. We just bought a bunch of F18s. Okay, well, can you do it without America? Yes, but also no, because we do need the Americans. Okay. Again, he goes on to talk about several other military artillery that the United States develops and then sells, but also effectively just gives to Finland and talks about all of those things that are necessary in order to be entirely autonomous from the US which is hilariously not possible. You can't have both things there, Prime Minister or president. I don't know how your governor government works there in Finland, but what I actually think this is, I think it's political posturing in their own countries. Ultimately, I think a lot of these Euros are not actually as mean, I guess, for lack of a better term, to President Trump behind the scenes, I can almost guarantee that every single person there. One. Now that the attention is on Greenland specifically in this instance, all of them, probably behind closed doors, are like, yeah, we, we. We kind of get it. You kind of probably actually need this. But because a bunch of people in our country and hate you, Mr. President, because your media hates you and that media is disseminated to our country, we kind of have to pretend that, like, no, we're not dependent on the American military. So if you just let us have a couple of these. My guess is that President Trump, in so many ways, is A pragmatist will probably go, I totally get it. We're gonna go ahead and take Greenland. Um, but go ahead and put on your show for your people in your country so that you don't lose your seat. But you better be willing to cooperate or it's gonna get not fun for you. And we're going to make it not good in your own home country. I want to move on because I got to get some of these in here. There's so many clips that can be played, but I did think that this one was particularly interesting considering how big this Minneapolis, Minnesota story has gotten. Obviously, on this particular instance, President Trump is talking about ice, but interestingly enough, it's. It makes sense to talk about in the context of this globalization push of like, well, there should be no border and every culture is the same and everybody should cooperate. President Trump uses the situation going on with all of the. With all of the corrupt Somalis, the corrupt, fraudulent Somalis in Minnesota, basically to make the point. Your stupid globalist idea doesn't work. Not all cultures are the same. And that's exactly what President Trump says here in cut 9.
- [11:34]
A
The situation in Minnesota reminds us that the west cannot mass import foreign cultures which have failed to ever build a successful society of their own. I mean, we're taking people from Somalia, and Somalia is a failed. It's not a nation. Got no government, got no police, got no military, got no nothing. And then we have this fake congressperson who they just reported is worth $30 million. You believe this Ilan Omar talking about the Constitution that provides me. She comes from a country that's not a country, and she's telling us how to run America. Not going to get away with it much longer, let me tell you.
- [12:17]
C
I wonder what he means by that. Is there a deportation effort to denaturalize Ilhan Omar and send her back to the country of her allegiance? I hope that's what President Trump was slyly hinting at. But more broadly, I think it makes sense to bring this sort of thing up. Yes, it is a domestic issue. Some. I saw people on X, I saw people across social media saying, why is President Trump looking at this particular issue that's domestic and trying to bring it to the broader globalist forum that is the World Economic Forum. Well, it actually makes sense if you look at it from a Western civilized nation state, which is the United States of America, juxtaposed to the. Whatever the hell Somalia is. And what happens when you integrate those two cultures effectively by force or by lax immigration policies? The United States unfortunately had under two unbelievably lib administrations. President Trump is basically articulating the fact that we all know these cultures are not compatible with the American idea and it has nothing to do with race. If there was a country made up of a different race that had the same sort of fraud, the same sort of corruption, the same sort of government officials stealing aid given by us, and then those people are taken, plopped into the United States and said, hey, you live here now by the way. You don't have to assimilate. It would turn out just as bad. It has nothing to do with anybody's skin color, even though that's what lives consistently like to run to. I think him bringing up Minnesota is a fantastic idea considering the broader idea of western countries not being able to take in en masse a bunch of people from a third world hellhole that doesn't share the culture, doesn't share the values, will not assimilate. It just doesn't work. And I think the Trump administration and the Cabinet Lutnick said this yesterday Bessant I was also talking about it. This whole idea that everybody's the same, all cultures are the same, just doesn't work. And I think they did a great job at sticking to that point. I want to get to this before we leave the World Economic Forum. This is a clip probably not seen really anywhere. This is from C Span and I just, I thought it was really interesting and kind of an insight into the inter political play between two arch rivals, obviously one substantially more powerful than the greasy haired governor of California. Yesterday we played a clip from Gavin Newsom allegedly exposing his deepest darkest inner fantasies of wanting to for some reason mate with President Trump as that was his own analogy that he used. He said President Trump is a T Rex. You either mate with him or get devoured. And considering Gavin Newsom has not yet been devoured, not entirely sure what he's implying. Maybe again it's his deepest darkest fantasies. But this clip is like a side shot that C Span got where when President Trump was talking about Gavin, Gavin actually was in the room himself and therefore had to put on an acting class of I'm not going to react to this or at least my reactions have to be poignant to get my side currently get my side further on my side. Um, I thought this was a really, really interesting clip. It's a little bit long. You can listen to President what President Trump is saying, but also I want you to watch Gavin's face as President Trump is talking about him at the World Economic Forum in davos. This is 10.
- [15:47]
A
We're going to help the people in California. We want to have no crime. I know Gavin was here. I used to get along so great with Gavin when I was president. Gavin's a good guy, and we're going to. If he needed it, I would do it in a heartbeat. I'd love to see. We did help them a lot in Los Angeles, a lot with the early. Early in my term when they had some problems. But we would love to do it. I would say this if I were Democrat, governor, whatever. I would call up Trump. I say, come on and make us look good, because we're cutting crime down to nothing and we're taking people out, career criminals who are only going to do bad things, and we're bringing them back to their countries. But where we've done it has been amazing, and we have a capacity to do it at much greater levels.
- [16:34]
C
Leave it on this shot of Gavin for a little bit. He's kind of smirking and not really giving much of an expression because I think deep down inside, he. He knows, one, that President Trump is right, and two, that the political tack that Gavin is taking is not tenable with the American people. Ultimately, we are the United States of America. Yes, there are people that disagree. Yes, there are some people that hate America, that we should figure out what to do with them. But ultimately, we want to be united in a country. Here is President Trump getting up and saying, I want to help the people of California. I want to remove all of the criminal illegals from that state, because California is a beautiful place, unfortunately ruined by terrible policies from this guy and a bunch of his cronies. The position politically that Gavin has taken was yesterday he said, there is no diplomacy with President Donald Trump. And this is where I think President Trump has a masterstroke of tactical political brilliance. Whereas Gavin is saying, there's absolutely no coordinating, talking to depression, diplomatic efforts with this vile human being. President Trump takes the high ground and says, yeah, we want to help your people. Actually, it'd be great. We would love for lib governors around the country to welcome us in because we can help solve all of their problems like we did with the national guard in Washington, D.C. like we're doing in Minneapolis, getting all of those illegals out of that godforsaken state. So hopefully the people of that state, regardless of their political ideology, can flourish. I loved watching Gavin, in my opinion, squirm, going, ah, shoot. I yesterday said, there's no diplomatic solution with this president. And here he is saying, I want to help the people of your state. I think Gavin, in this instance realized, oh, man, I'm not going to reverse course because I have too much pride. Pride is the most difficult sin to overcome. But, oh, we got to figure something out here. I think that's what's going on in Gavin's head here. But again, I think a masterstroke from the President of the United States regarding political. Being a political tactician, we got a lot to get to here today. Really interesting story coming out of the uk Speaking of globalists who want surveillance. Globalist commies who want surveillance on literally everybody. The UK is taking one step closer to that and it's not, not great. Honestly, it's not great. Um, so we'll get to that coming up after the break. As well as what is going on in one of the bluest states who previously had a conservative governor. Uh, they are going off in a crazy direction that nobody wants to see. What? Oh, where are they now? The Washington Free Beacon did a great little piece on kjp, the diversity hire. The first gay, black, immigrant, lesbian to. I already said lesbian and gay. Same thing. Anyways, the first one of those to be the White House press secretary. Where is she now? It's kind of actually funny. We'll be right back after the break. Don't go away.
- [19:42]
D
Bettering your business takes working with the best.
- [19:45]
C
With the James Hardy alliance, you gain access to leads, training, networking, and support.
- [19:50]
D
From the number one brand of sales.
- [19:52]
C
Residing in North America. Achieve new levels of success by joining.
- [19:55]
D
The James Hardy alliance today.
- [20:04]
C
The United States of America. Oh, nice. I recognize some of the athletes from this. That's cool. Oh, here's Venezuela. The United States of America. Or no, the United States of America. I think they're having like a problem with the broadcast, cuz that's like, that's Canada. The United States of America. Why is this happening? Do you know what's wrong? You're watching the Olympics on cbs. We. Let's see here. We can turn this off as an imperialist by nature wanting to build the American empire. That is hilarious. If you just listen to the podcast, there are people from flags that the Venezuelans, United States of America, also Canada. America's hat. The potential 51st date could be the 52nd state if we end up getting Greenland. So, you know, who knows what's going on there? But wow, that's, that's, that is some solid Internet content. Unfortunately though, that guy might get imprisoned for watching such a funny video or making such a funny video. In the godforsaken hellhole, soulless United Kingdom, uh, the UK is introduced or is looking at some pretty scary dystopian AI policing. British police forces are planning to trial artificial intelligence schemes to predict and target potential criminals before an offense has been committed. In other words, hey, the computer thinks that you might be a criminal. You're going to have to come with us. Does that sound scary and dystopian to anybody? Because it sure does to me. Now there's a lot of different nuances that we'll get into in just a little bit, but I think one of the, one of the better arguments, it's not a good argument, but it's a better argument for this. But also the argument kind of collapses on his face. I'm going to stop talking about the argument itself and just tell you it. Sir Andy Marsh, who is the head of the college policing, again, I'm not entirely sure how the government works. I don't really even know what that means. But he was quoted in this Breitbart, Breitbart article said that the predictive AI model and this, this makes sense in this particular context. Context, but it kind of doesn't says that it will predict men who might be a threat to women and girls. Now you might be thinking, why that's actually, that's actually great. Uh, he goes on to say, we know the data and case histories tell us, unfortunately there it's far from uncommon for these individuals to move from one female victim to another. In other words, people who have a certain criminal proclivity may assault one female and then move on to the next. And you may think, well, that would be good for AI to be able to tell us who might be more likely to do that. The inherent problem with that is why do they have the opportunity to do that in the first place? Why is there a justice penal system that allows, hey, this person, this person was convicted of a. Assaulting women, sexually or otherwise, and we're gonna go ahead and let them back on the streets and. But we do have a predictive AI model that will tell us whether or not they will recommit that crime. How about, you know, you tie up the loose end and say, Ah, 30 years. I don't know if that may be too aggressive, depending on the case. But if it's a very aggressive case at 30 years or you know, castration, one of those two things. So that is really the only decent argument, I guess, to say, no, no, AI will help us tell who's going to reoffend on these crimes against women and girls, but also if they don't have the opportunity to reoffend, the whole predictive AI model goes out the window. Where it gets kind of scary is the facial recognition. The Home Secretary, someone named Shabana Mahmood, probably guess where she's from, says she wants to transform surveillance in Britain so that I can have eyes of the state be on you at all times. Again, that sounds pretty dystopian. And yet it is making its way forward in the Western nation of the uk. She said this when talking to a group of people. This is again the Home Secretary of the UK regarding safety and policing and all that sort of stuff. She says, when I, when I was in justice, my ultimate vision was for part of the criminal justice system to achieve by means of AI and technology what was achieved in the Panopticon. We'll explain that in just a little bit. That is to say that eyes of the state can be on you at all times. I think there is a big, big space here for being able to harness the power of AI and tech to, to get ahead of criminals, frankly, which is what we are trying to do. The Panopticon, if you don't know, is this kind of allegorical sense of trying to picture a society in which there. Well, there's. It's a jail, I think, as Michelle Foucault, which is a crazy, wackadoodle leftist woke philosopher of the 50s, he's a French guy, probably should have brushed up on this a little bit, but his basic idea was the prison guard should be able to see everybody at all times to make sure that there's no nefarious activity going on. And what she's saying is, look, we should have eyes on every citizen at all times, no matter what, so that we can keep people safe. When has that ever backfired drastically? Um, now, this is not the first time that the UK has been trying to thwart criminal activity. Now, I'm not saying that you shouldn't try to get plans from people, but to use AI as a predictive model to say that individual looks like they're going to commit a crime could lead to some pretty bad scenarios and situations that reduce freedom substantially. The article that this is taken from was this, Was this Breitbart? You know, it was. Breitbart said just last week, a West Midlands police officer was forced to resign as the police chief after it was revealed that a decision to ban Israeli soccer fans from a football match. This has nothing to do with Israel, it's just it that happened to be Israelis, Israeli fans from a soccer match between Maccabee Tel Aviv and West Ham in Birmingham was based on false claims derived by their Microsoft Copilot AI chatbot. In other words, they used AI to say, hey, this. This group of people, these individuals are going to commit a crime, so therefore take preemptive action to restrict their freedom. Bottom line, this is not going to work. But there is good news. The godless communists who want eyes on everybody all the time, if they're using. If they're using predictive models on AI to try to stop crime before it happens, tries to stop criminals before it happens, let's just say that given practical statistics, the program's going to be called racist pretty immediately. Now, again, I am against this in all facets, because generally speaking, you know, who says that the AI doesn't just make things up? And who says that people won't say, oh, the AI said this person is a danger and a threat. We should arrest that person. Obviously, that is a huge concern.
- [27:35]
A
So.
- [27:35]
C
But also, if the AI were to actually do what it's going to do, statistically speaking, somebody from the lib side, the globalist communist libs who want this sort of stuff will also help in destroying it, because they'll be like, hey, this is. This is predicting that too many people of color are committing crimes. This is predicting that too many Third Worlders that have come into the country are committing all these crimes. Therefore, the system itself is. Is in fact racist. Therefore we need to get rid of it. So, yes, we should get rid of it, because government having eyes on you at all times is a dystopian nightmare. But also, I think we'll actually get some help from the left because they'll. They'll soon realize. No, no, hold on. This is. This is. This is rounding up too many of these Third Worlders who don't understand the culture, the norms and the values of this country. Therefore, it is racist, and the libs will ultimately destroy themselves when it comes to this. I think. Speaking of libs destroying themselves, I did want to get this in here, you know, the other day. Was it Monday? I specifically mentioned that I didn't want to bring the narcissistic gay black guy into the fold. You may know who I'm talking about. One Don Lemon.
- [28:47]
A
Who.
- [28:47]
C
Who decided to insurrection a church with a bunch of people. He says he was, you know, just there reporting. Ah, they kind of, you know, contextually didn't. Didn't exactly look like that. Maybe, maybe he might have had a little Bit of an instigation role himself, allegedly, in case Don himself sees this and wants to sue us for some particular reason. But it was actually, this is the one thing I do want to get on here, kind of in the context of the government versus self government, the external versus the internal reality. Don Lemon said this on a podcast with what's her name, crazy lady, used to be on Bravo, Jennifer Welch. And he actually makes a point that is true, although he's trying to spin that point to help cultivate his own argument, which it does not. This is cut 11. This is Don Lemon talking about Christians and Christianity as a whole in the United States of America. Cut 11.
- [29:49]
E
There's a certain degree of entitlement. I think people who are, you know, in religious groups like that, it's not the type of Christianity that I practice, but I think that they're entitled and that that entitlement comes from a supremacy, a white supremacy. And they think that this country was built for them, that it is a Christian country. When actually we left England because we wanted religious freedom. It's religious freedom, but only if you're a Christian and only if you're a white male. Pretty much, yeah.
- [30:13]
C
Okay, so, I mean, the last part of that is obviously ridiculous. The United States broke off from the, the, the British controlled church, which is intermixed with the state. The church and state were one in the same effectively. And, you know, religious freedom. I don't think the founders. Well, maybe they did, but the founders, when they said, hey, we're going to separate church from state, they really just meant, oh, we don't want to have the state endorse a particular sect of Christianity because, you know, if you're a method, if you're Catholic, if you're Presbyterian, all of that is fine. But you know, we're all Christians here and we don't want the government taking a denomination. You know, you know, we can talk about that all day. But he does say something really interesting that is, is in fact true in those videos when a bunch of those libs, crazy people insurrection that poor church there in St Paul. We did get an email. I said Minneapolis apparently was St. Paul. Same thing in my opinion. But you know, thanks for the correction anyways, saying, you know, look at you and your, your Kush lifestyle with your nice clothes and your coffee and your, your privileged life. And I was watching that and you know, in conjunction with one Don Lemon making those points, and I thought to myself, that's true. And it's true because we are Christians. Christians generally speaking, yes, we'll get prosecuted from the outside. And that's. That's always happening. Defense of Christianity will unfortunately, consistently lead to persecution. Jesus, the Bible warns us about this constantly, but on an internal, personal basis, which is what the religion is meant to be for. How do you govern yourself internally? How do you order your life in a moral, Christian, virtuous way? Practically speaking, that does lead to a better life. You want to go in there and, you know, say, hey, you Christians, your life is too good. Well, not too good, but it is good. Being a Christian has ordered my life in a way, and this is consistent and true for any Christians that I know for the most part. You know, some people kind of, you know, say the things, but I'm not here to judge people's hearts. These people say, like, well, this is you. You have. You have such a cush life. And I say, correct, things are pretty good. Yeah, there's outside influences that consistently try to take you down, consistently try to persecute you for your faith if you're a Christian. But we were warned about that. But internally, in my household, with myself, my wife, and our two kids, life is pretty good. It's really interesting, this idea that the left has about privilege. I constantly say to friends, family, but my wife and I talk about this a lot. Our kids are going to be privileged beyond belief, and it will have nothing to do with money or wealth or power. It will have everything to do with the fact that they have a stable household, they have two parents that love them, they grow up with Christian moral values and will be put out into the world with that value set. And that in and of itself is a fantastic privilege. But for some reason, libs always conflate that with, like, a monetary thing. And, like, yeah, you know, having money makes things. Well, it allows you to do certain things. I wouldn't say it makes things easier because then you would see all the rich people having their lives together and not having a bunch of chaos go around, go in and around what it is that they're doing. But the bottom line here, I think, is that Don and a bunch of those people that stormed that church accused a bunch of the people in the church of having a good life, as if they were supposed to apologize for that, and also as if that good life isn't promulgated by the values and virtues that Christians tend to have. So, yeah, Don, you're right. We are privileged in a lot of ways. And you could be, too, if, in fact, you decided to order your life in such a way as Jesus probably would have wanted to do. I think he mentioned to he's like, oh, that's not the Christianity I preach. Okay. Again, not here to judge the hearts of anybody because I can't do that. That's God and God alone. And also a little skeptical there. Probably not supposed to do that, but just it is interesting. TBT tbsa.com if you would like to judge the judge the verbiage of one Don Lemon or leave a comment wherever it is that you're watching. Coming up next, want to get to some of these stuff that's going on in apparently now deep blue Virginia, which is concerning to say the least as well as where are they now? KJP has exited the White House as a year out from that. And what is she doing? It actually is kind of funny. We'll be right back after the break. Don't go away.
- [35:13]
A
Foreign.
- [35:18]
C
This is just your friendly reminder that Rogan, Viagra and testosterone are all gender affirming care. So be sure to pass this along to a man, you know.
- [35:27]
A
Bye.
- [35:29]
C
That's clever. There's a bunch of dumb lives that'll actually think that that's a good argument. I mean, obviously the argument collapses in on itself. If, if your physical anatomy has nothing to do with your gender, why then would changing your physical anatomy, quote unquote, affirm your gender? I just doesn't, it doesn't make any sense. And on top of that too, you know, we're talking about appearances, right? That's, that's the whole, I guess women can use Rogaine. What was the other one she said Rogaine Viagra. I don't, I don't think, regardless, regardless of what you're trying to affirm in yourself, Viagra doesn't work on women. And believe me, I wish it did. I, sorry, sorry for getting a little, you know, may maybe a little sorry for if you're a little bit prudish. But if, if there were a pill that did the same thing that Viagra does for men to women, I would love to know about it. So yeah, your whole gender affirming thing, I get it. It's a clever argument. And you know, dumb people can be swayed by that sort of argument. But ultimately for a myriad of different reasons, it doesn't work. I'm taking too much time here. I want to get to this Virginia stuff. So this is really interesting and kind of a testament to the fact that elections have consequences. Libs now hold a majority in both houses of the General assembly there in Virginia. Remember, Glenn Youngkin was The conservative governor of Virginia, which was a shock to a bunch of people. Unfortunately, he's now gone. They've now got Abigail Spanberger. Major live. The lieutenant Governor is an in pronounceable name. I'm not sure anybody knows how to pronounce it, but she did get sworn in on a Quran. So I can I assume that everything she thinks is a lie. And also the attorney general there is also live. That's the. The guy who wants to kill conservatives, who like fantasizes his deepest and darkest desires. But the people of Virginia elected him was really interesting because the new governor, the incoming governor, Abigail Spanberger, in her inaugural address basically was talking about how she's going to govern non partisanly. And a lot of us were wondering, well, how long is that going to last? Spoiler alert. About five minutes. Her first act as governor was to do this. This is cut 12. This is the governor of Virginia repealing an executive order that mandates state and local law enforcement to cooperate, not assist, just cooperate with immigration officials. And actually she does say something here that I think is precise and I think on purpose and actually pretty interesting. Watch this cut 12. And this executive order rescinds executive order number 47. State and local law enforcement should not be required to divert their limited resources to enforce federal civil immigration laws. It is a responsibility of federal law enforcement. Virginia state and local law enforcement officers.
- [38:39]
A
Must be able to focus on their.
- [38:40]
C
Rapport responsibilities investigating crime and community policing. Go ahead and leave that up here for a second. But that is. Who's that guy? What is it to her? Right? Standing up the ball. Oh, that's the dude who wants to kill a bunch of conservatives that for some reason the good people of Virginia elected to be their attorney general. I. Sorry, what? Jay Jones. That's the guy who, yeah, wants to. To kill a bunch of conservatives. But anyways, her first act as the governor was to say, hey, law enforcement, you're not allowed to participate with any sort of immigration official at the federal level. Um, but she did say something that I think was precise and on purpose. She said, you're not allowed to participate in federal civil immigration laws. Which I think brings us back to a point that we've been making on this show for a very long time. Congress needs to criminalize being in the United States illegally. It's a civil violation to overstay a deportation notice. And libs love to use. Well, it's not a crime, it's just a civil violation. Okay, well, it's a misdemeanor so we can get into the nuances of the legal definitions revolving around that. But ultimately, Congress can pass a law that says no overstaying a deportation order is a crime, which would negate executive orders like this, where she specifically and precisely said federal civil immigration laws. Because you can't navigate yourself around the criminal stuff, politically speaking. I don't think so. There's that. What. What's also interesting that's going on there is there have been several proposed constitutional amendments. We won't get to all of them, but one of them, Virginia. And this is past their house party line votes, because of course it is. It amends the Virginia constitution to make sure that women can kill babies inside the womb. So great job going on there. Elections have consequences. One of the other constitutional amendments is the giving crim. Giving felons the right to vote after all of their sentence has been served. The Virginia libs, again, voting on party lines mostly basically say, hey, you know, you can. You can commit a felony and therefore break the social contract, which therefore would probably lose some of the rights you would have as a citizen, because the citizen abides by the social contract. You can go ahead and vote now. I wonder if they would be saying that if, you know, they didn't consistently vote with libs and also talking about the congressional redistricting. They're trying to put it in their constitution where, hey, libs are going to be able to control all of the redistricting in our state. Interestingly Enough, there are 11 congressional districts in Virginia. Six of them are libs, five of them are conservatives. And if they were able to redistrict, they'd probably take all of those five conservative seats out. There's a video we have to play here, but I probably rambled on too long. I think that I really would love to get to this. There is a bill on the docket, and all of this is kind of culminating around the idea that elections have consequences. Remember, Virginia said no to the black woman and yes to the white woman because of course, it's racism. Um, let's go ahead and blame the Virginia libs of racism there, because that's what they would do to us. Um, Barack Obama rejected the black lady. He said, specifically, we have to vote for black candidates, people that look like us, and then endorsed the white candidate over the black one on ideological terms. So that whole point is moot. But this is another one. Elections have consequences. The Virginia legislature is looking to eliminate mandatory minimums. In other words, hey, if you commit a crime and you're convicted of that crime, and the judge doesn't have to sentence you for anything specifically. That goes for dui, drug possession, distribution, firearm offenses, sex offenses like rape. Firearms is also interesting. A bunch of libs want to get rid of firearms and then don't enforce any of the laws that they set up, which is another thing in and of itself. Sex offenses like rape and child pornography, in other words. Yeah, we don't, we don't want to make the judges sentence any of these convicted criminals of sex offenses and child porn. The mandatory minimums shouldn't be a thing that is on the docket there. Um, gotta stop. There's, there's so much to get to. There's so much fun stuff, fun, horrifying stuff in this. But I think the bottom line here is elections have consequences. Vote wisely at all times. Coming up next, first of all, tptbsa.com if you'd like to send along your thoughts, comments, concerns about this or anything else. We've talked about the show tbt tbsa.com I'm going to briefly talk about where is KJP? What is she doing now? I know you might think, well, that's not interesting, but it actually kind of is. Before we get to our Mailbag segment, if you want to be included in mailbag, tptpsa.com we'll be right back after the break. Don't go away.
- [43:36]
F
They were trying to set up a process that will allow this country to return to what it was in 1876 when the election got thrown into the House of Representatives and they were able to overturn what Abraham Lincoln and the Congress had done successfully getting rid of slavery. That is what they are attempting to do today. I get sick and tired of hearing people say, it's never been like this before. Yes, it has been.
- [44:09]
C
Here's what I have to say to Representative James Clyburn about the ability to bring back slavery. We can do that. That would be fantastically helpful. Around my house, Obviously I wouldn't, you know, do it based on any sort of race, but if I could have a slave, that would. God, you know how much I'd get done. Unbelievable. We have to pay Producer Glenn. You're telling me that I can bring back slavery and enslave him to do this entire job for free Guy, I thought it was outta the question, but apparently that's what we're trying to do, which obviously the implication there is that we can do it. To which I say, let's go for it. I'm tired of Pan Producer Glenn as well as producer Tino. Anybody who works on this show, I could just enslave them. Or at least that's what I'm trying to do. According to Congressman Clyburn. Uh, let's see. Wow, we really. I jabbered on way too long, but I also thought a lot of it was important. Kjp. Where is she now? Really fun article out of the Washington Free beacon. Uh, since 2025, she announced that she is leaving the lib party and becoming an independent. She wrote a book that nobody has read. And a bunch of libs actually benefited us. A bunch of libs thought, oh, shoot, this is the worst piece of literature that's ever been put out. Maybe Di Di is a bad idea and coaxed them onto our side. Um, this is what I thought is really interesting. This is actually what people do when they get out of the administration. Uh, they go find these like DEI speaking jobs. Next month in Los Angeles, KJP will be hosting the 17th annual African American Film Critics Awards. According to the Washington Free Beacon, Kareem John Pierre is hosting the racially segregated award show. It was especially important role given by the. Given to her by. She says in the wake of turbulent political climate, we need an opportunity and space to celebrate ourselves. Just like overtly racist. Okay, so that's what you do after you leave a lib White House. You just become even more overtly racist as racist. I gotta, I gotta. This. Let me get to this quote here, just really quick. Alex Thompson of Axios reported that many Biden staffers disliked Kareem Jodpierre because, quote, she was kind of dumb and had no interest in understanding harder topics. Fact check. True. I can, I can affirm having seen her a number of times, that that is true. Gotta take a break. Mailbag 7. Coming up next. TPTBSA.com if you'd like to be included in the short time that we have, send in your emails right now. We'll be right back after the break.
- [47:02]
A
I'm telling you, it's right there. Turn around. Patrick. Just turn around. Kyra, You must think I'm pretty dumb, huh? Yes. Turn around. No. Turn around. Turn around. No. I'm gonna say this once and I'm not gonna say it again, so pay attention. I am not, I repeat, not going to turn around for any reason ever.
- [47:37]
C
That's a. That's from our conservative friends in Canada. There are some up there. Actually there's a lot up there is Alberta that's voting on whether or not they should leave Canada and be part of the United States. That would be Huge. That'd be great. That's my favorite type of meme. When you have like an. When you have spongebob illustrate a point that is going on politically. All right, get some mail back here. TPT tbsa.com if you'd like to be included. We'll have to keep these short because I. I talked a lot. I talk a lot. I have the tendency to do that. But on the topic of Macron wearing sunglasses at his WEF speech, Gary says, I would have rather opted for an eye patch instead of sunglasses. That's actually a good point. I didn't even think about yesterday. But an eye patch, it would have been weird and yes, there would have been attention drawn to it. Actually, you know what? You know what, Gary? I'm not entirely sure that's a good idea either. I think you get. I think you get some grace for having, you know, some sort of, you know, whatever he had going on in his eye. I think. I think we'd be calling him a pirate. I actually don't know. I love the thought there. I'm not sure that that would have been a better idea than wearing sunglasses. On that same topic, I can't read this, but frequent correspondent Napalm, I understand what you're getting at. There is alleging some untoward activity in a massage parlor that led to one of Macron's eyes being STD infected. I. That I said too much. I'm sorry. There's that. J. On the topic of my consistent mispronunciation of Mamdani says hello. I've noticed that you've discussed the proper pronunciation of the mayor of nyc. I'm fairly sure it's pronounced Moron Zam Danny. It's easily you switch the last letters or the first letters of both of his names by mistake and you could do it that way. Moron Zam Danny actually does make a lot of sense. The moron being the operative term here. Talks about ignoring 400 years of socialist failure and all that sort of stuff. That wraps it up with this. Jay, this is fantastic. When the bread runs out, let them eat falafel. You either get that one or you don't. I'm not going to explain it to you, Mark. On the topic of Governor Hairspray, which I thought this was interesting. Mark is a frequent correspondent to the show as well. Says he was trying to eat a snack. I assume that Governor Hairspray comment made him laugh. To which I would say, you know, I thought. I feel like I've made that comment a number of times, but regardless, appreciate it. Sorry for ruining the stack snack if there was a spit take going on there. Let me see if we have any other time. We don't have other time to get to the rest of these. Keep sending your emails though. Remember, if they're disgusting, vile, bigoted, and just downright hateful, it'll fit right in here and we'll read it on our show. Tptposa.com is the email address. Thanks so much for tuning in. Appreciate you taking the time out of your evening. We will see you tomorrow same time, same place. God Bless America.
- [50:49]
A
This is an iHeart podcast.
- [50:52]
C
Guaranteed Human.