Transcript
A (0:00)
Come on in. It's time, you know. It's time. If only I could find. Yes, there it is. How are the stocks today? Stocks doing okay? Let me check before I go live. Oh, stocks not good. We won't be talking about that. Nope. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And you never had a better time. But if you'd like to take a chance on elevating your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a copper. A mug or a glass, A tankard shell, Cysteine. A canteen, sugar flask. A vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine. Day of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip in the heavens. Now, The sip of sips. Well, I saw that Elon Musk had noted that his competitor Waymo, the self driving car taxi company, has expanded to the entire Bay Area. San Francisco Bay area. That's where I live. So now I could take awaymo way more. Way more than I could. Yep, way more than I could. And I was wondering how big a deal it is to be the first self driving car company in an area. Don't you think that if you loaded one app and it worked out, let's say you put the Waymo app on your phone and then you call the Waymo and it showed up and you're happy with the experience, would you even do another one? Or would you say, I'm a Waymo personnel, does everything I need to do? I think going first is going to be a really big deal. So Elon better get some. Get some local firsts. Although if you were going to try two things, you try Waymo and then you would definitely try Tesla. So if you're going to try two things, the second one would. If not, the first thing would definitely be Tesla. Elon says that AI has run out of human knowledge to train on. So now the knowledge it trains on is knowledge it makes up. How in the world does that work? It just makes up knowledge and then it trains itself. And the stuff I've made up, does that sound like it would work? Does your common sense tell you that that AI could get smarter by simply hallucinating what's true and then acting like it just got trained on something that was true? How does that work? I don't know. I'm a little bit suspicious that That's a real thing. But I like, I like the idea that AI has already run out of human knowledge to train on. All of human knowledge has now been, you know, basically used. Nothing left. So that's how smart the AI is. So there was this guy Lecun, who, who is the head AI guy at Meta. He's reporting, leaving Meta. I think I told you this before, but I didn't give you the reason, which I just found out today. The reason he's leaving Meta, the top AI guy, is he doesn't think the large language models are a path to human level AI. He calls it a dead end. So one of the guys who arguably would be the top AI guys in the country is in complete agreement with the cartoonist who has spent really no time in AI. And we have exactly the same prediction. Hey, this doesn't look like it could go very far. It looks like you've already reached your limit of what you can do. Well, well, the crude and I, we agree it's already reached this limit. All right, what else is happening? Yeah, the one thing that never gets less funny is when a Democrat says something and then there's a compilation clip that shows that the Democrat was lying or said the opposite thing. Well, we got another one. So Gavin Newsom is complaining on video. He goes, not one person ever in my office has ever used the word Latinx. How long did it take someone to make a compilation clip of all the times that Gavin Newsome not just people in his office, but how many times did Gavin Newsom use the word Latinx on video in public? There's a few times. Yeah. Not only did people in his office use it, he used it. And he's acting like, oh, no, no, no, I never would have used that. And people in my office, are you kidding me? Why would we ever use that? Oh, good, compilation clip. And as somebody asked, I saw this in a post on. Asked by one bad dude. One bad dude. Do you think that Gavin knew he was lying? Because sometimes it's ambiguous, isn't it? Maybe he knew he was lying, he just figured nobody would check. Or did he not remember that he used it? Or did he use it for a week and got over it and doesn't remember he used it for a week? I don't know. Probably just forgot. It's my best guess. Anyway, Trump wants to. Not that it's going to happen, but he expressed a desire that the FCC would cancel the licenses of ABC and NBC for being fake news and deep state propaganda for the Democratic Party. So he Accused them. ABC and NBC. Yeah. Deep state propaganda. So are you happy with that? Are you okay if the President United States tries to take down ABC and NBC, as in won't even be networks anymore? Well, I don't think it's going to happen. So probably looks again like one of these really just a threat so that they'll say less bad things about him in the future. I think he has a totally legitimate case. I believe that what Trump is complaining about is real. It's fake news. And I think he has every right to complain about it. Also has every right to try to put him out of business because they're trying to put him out of business. So it's not an ideal situation that our main, two of our main news sources are so undependable that the President wants them banned. That's pretty bad. But he's not wrong. They do seem to be legitimately and really fake news. All right, we of course have to talk about the Epstein files. The, the story that never ends. It never ends. Can I wake up one morning and not have a new story about the Epstein files that are not really news stories? All right, what's the latest news story? That's not a new story. So Trump is still calling the Epstein files a hoax, a Democrat hoax. And now what's new is he's called on House Republicans to vote to release the Epstein files. So he's completely reversed from don't, don't release them to release them. Now, what do you think happened when he reversed from don't release them to release them? Because when he said don't release them, his critics said, oh, there must be some bad stuff in there for Trump because that's why you don't want him released. But now these guys do release them. What do his own people say? Well, everybody, basically they say, oh, he must have. I think it was. Who was it? Wasn't it Bill Crystal. So Bill Crystal is suggesting that the only reason that Trump would say release them is he's already scrubbed out all the bad stuff that would pertain to him. You think that's true? We'll never know. And then let's see what else. We have nothing to hide. Trump says, well, we'll find out. And he says, I don't care. They can have whatever they are legally entitled to. I, I don't care, he says in all caps. But he doesn't want some of these big names on the Democrat side looked into the Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, Larry Summers. He mentions them again. And then there's the Other possibility that there was never any risk to Trump. There was nothing in there, but there was some risk to somebody important that he wanted to protect. You know, maybe ahead of state, maybe, maybe somebody in our intelligence group said, oh, you don't want to throw that country under the bus, so just pretend there's nothing in there.
