Jack (63:54)
Pretty much. And what, what's been amazing to me though. So I actually went there, I went down to the, the memorial and I, I was at the, you know, they're placing flowers and I wasn't out, out, out there when they had the, the barricades and they were setting up this sort of autonomous zone like they did in Seattle back in the Summer of Love. And they had taken that, the police had actually taken that down at that point. But what's amazing is that when you, when you talk to the people there, they're not even aware that the other movie exists. And I think this is something that you've talked about a lot where when you talk to, you know, conservatives or you know, sort of people in the middle, they're sort of aware of the two sides. They're aware of the two, two arguments. And in, in many cases, if you're, and if you're, if you're better at it, if you're, if you're really involved, you can usually explain what the other side thinks as well. But when you talk to these guys, there is no other movie and, and what they seem to find, and I see this with like a lot of MSNBC hosts, they'll sit there, Chris Hayes will sit there and say, why is it that these conservatives, these Trump supporters, why is it that they're so evil? Why is it that they, that they can't get on board with the things that we believe, which are obviously the true and right things, because we know that progressivism is the truth. So, so they spend all their time without any theory of mind that anyone could possibly have a different look on the situation. Whereas, you know, you see people that are on, I don't even know what you call it, more independent thinkers, I guess you would say. And you see those different maps, right, where they'll talk, where they'll show that the, the left, you know, the left side of the spectrum is, is consolidated down into one point, whereas the right side of the spectrum has this, this large bubble of different opinions and a different spectrum where, you know, here's your libertarian, here's your nationalist, here's your conservative, here's your neocon, and there's, there's all sorts of different opinions that sort of float around here. But on the left it's all, all consolidated down into 1.1 perspective is the only thing allowed. They don't have any even allowance for this difference of opinion or a difference of a theory of mind or a theory of I guess, object reality. And that's, that's one of the things that's been going viral around lately as well, which I think is really interesting where people are talking about Devin Erickson. Scott, I don't know if you've seen his, his thread on this where he says you have to understand that it isn't just iq, it's that so many people are indistinguishable from large language models because even if they have high iq, they don't have an, an object theory of reality, they only have an object theory of language. So it's just word, word, word, word and then an LLM. As you, I've always thought your explanation of an LLM is the best because it's just predicting what the next word is going to be or the next string of words. And they use mapping to do this. And so people who don't have an object, an object view, an object model of reality like computers could, because computers can't understand reality the way that we do, at least. Or perhaps we have a better object view. That's why people aren't computers and computers aren't people. But the real interesting thing that Devin Erickson is talking about is there's a lot of people you meet and they could be, they could be doctors, they could be experts, they could be researchers, they could be scientists. And the minute that you, that you sort of question their language model by referring to something in reality, it all sort of falls apart.
