
Loading summary
A
If you ever wondered if you really need a realtor to buy an investment property? Or have you ever thought about putting 40% down and self managing, making it a smarter move? Well, today we're going to break that down along with what do you do when a borrower ghosts you? This episode will help you avoid costly missteps and move forward with confidence. This is the Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I'm Ashley Karen.
B
And I'm Tony J. Robinson. And before we jump into the first question, let's just give Ashley a big shout out for being so hip that she knows what 67 is. And if you don't have a kid between the ages of probably, I don't know, 8 and 18, you might not know what that is. But look it up. Give yourself a good laugh of going down the wormhole trying to figure out what it means. Because we don't even know what it means. We just know that we should be saying it.
A
We don't. But also, Tony brought up too, because before I said I want to say the episode number for this, he said, you do realize this releases in January and it's probably an old trend by now, so everybody is probably, probably rolling their eyes and every kid that's sitting in the back of your car right now listening to this is like, probably like that's so yesterday.
B
That is so yesterday. We're such millennials. For my, my. So my son's almost 18 and he called me Unk the other day. So I'm like officially my Unk phase. Well, let's get into the first question for today. Today's first question comes from Macaulay in the Bigger Pockets forums, and McCauley says, I'm looking for guidance on whether or not I am required to use a Realtor to buy my second property or not. I hear all of these success stories from so many people about buying rental properties, but no one has ever mentioned if they use a Realtor or not. I assume some state laws require you to have a real estate agent in order to close on a house slash investment property. My question is do I need a Realtor to buy on slash off market deals and if so, what are some good questions to ask to make sure their expertise aligns with my investment strategy? It's a great question and it's the perfect kind of beginner question that I think can be put to rest some of the misconceptions that exist out there. As far as I'm aware, and obviously I haven't purchased in all 50 states. I don't know of any States that require you to use an agent to transact on real estate. Now I know there are some states, ash, like where you're at in New York where you have to use an attorney for closing. But attorneys are not agents. I'm not personally aware of any states that require you to use an agent to transaction real estate. Do you know of any ash?
A
No. The only thing I would think is like kind of an iffy area is if like what like the seller has an agent and then you go to buy the property. Do you, how would that work? Like, because anytime I've done that it's been like a dual agent and they get the 6 commission or whatever. So like, but you like sign a form saying they're representing both of you. So I've, I've never experienced or heard of anyone that like has went and bought a deal off the MLS and not used an agent. Whether it's the seller's agent and you're using that person to represent both of you or if you've gone and gotten your own agent to represent you. So that's actually a piece I don't know the answer to.
B
I don't know either. I've purchased quite a few where I've gone directly to the listing agent but I just always offer it to them like, hey, I don't have an agent. You can double in the deal if you want to. I don't need you to, but you can if you want to. See, I don't know if maybe there is a law or rule around that. So if you're watching on YouTube and you have the answers that question, drop it in the comments and cite your source so we can all go back and double check that.
A
Don't cite Chat. GPT.
B
Yeah, my good friend Chat said even.
A
Though it probably does have the answer.
B
Yeah it probably does. But I think maybe the main point of this question is just like is there, is there value? So I think the first part, no, generally speaking it is not required to work with an agent. Now I do think for a lot of new investors, honestly that there's value in working with an agent. I think about the first deal that I bought and my agent was an amazing resource both in terms of getting a better understanding of that area because I was investing long distance, having a connection to other vendors in that market that I was going to need, namely my general contractor that I ended up hiring. So my agent as a first time investor was incredibly valuable. Not so much for, I don't know, like the transactional side, but just their Overall knowledge of the market and their connections to other people. So yeah, I would maybe even just encourage you McCall, if you're investing in a market where you're not super familiar, there is value maybe in having an agent working with you.
A
And I think too really sit down and understand what you're not confident in so you can look for an agent who knows that well. So like when I go to like a new neighborhood or a new area, I rely on my agent a lot to like tell me about the comms, to tell me about the area, what's up and coming, what's, you know, the bad parts of your, what streets should I stick to things like that. And I think that has tremendous value. If you need help like actually analyzing the deal, make sure you're working with an investor friendly agent. Because you know, I work with an agent that does a lot of selling primary homes and not a ton of investment property. And I think I don't really rely on her at all to actually analyze the deal. I go and do that myself and I feel very confident in that. But I do rely on her. I need, I rely on her for showings and for a lot of the market analysis. If it's like a different area of town that I don't have rentals in, I really, really appreciate the information that she has and she provides for me. And I also rely on her for negotiation. As in what's, what are people negotiating in the current market? Like if I add in a contingency that they need to have the whole house cleaned out, broom swept and leave the appliances, is that going to cut me out as a contender? Because everybody else is saying leave all your junk, we'll take care of it. So I also rely on her for a lot of the negotiation piece and like, as issues come up, I even the inspection, I will rely on her as a part of like what's going on in the current market. Like our buyers like going to take care of this or the sellers take care of this. So I think there is a lot of value in using an agent, but you have to, you have to know going into it what do you need help on? Because you could get an agent that has no idea what the rental comps are and you needed help on that and then it's not going to be as valuable to you as you thought using an agent was.
B
Yeah, great point Ash. Like that that nuanced information they have about the market is really important. I met an agent once who sold property in Florida and she told me to not buy Homes in her city that were built in the 90s. And she's like, any other decade, you're fine. But the ones in the 90s, she's like, I bought and sold a lot of houses in this market. Those ones always suck when it comes to getting flood insurance. She's like, I don't know why, but insurance companies hate the homes from the 90s. You only get that kind of knowledge if you've done a lot of deals in a market and agents sometimes have. Have that expertise. And then like on the other side that I mentioned of just like their network and their contract or their contacts, I went out to Oklahoma City. I've talked about it a few times in the podcast over the summer. And I met with an agent who I found through the Bigger Pockets agent Finder. And she gave me the lay the land. But then she introduced me to, hey, here's an insurance agent for this market. Here's a contractor, here's a handyman, here's some property management companies literally gave me like an entire Rolodex of people that I could then go out and network with to build my team of people to be able to do this remotely. So the right agent, I think, can make your first deal exponentially easier because of their knowledge and their, their Rolodex of folks they can introduce you to. And then, Ash, the last part of that question was, what questions, as a rookie investor, should I ask an agent?
C
First?
B
Find your agent from the Bigger Pockets Agent finder, because those are typically folks who know and understand what it means to work with an investor and not general retail buyers who are looking to buy their dream home or their starter home. So first, just make sure you're going to the right place. But second, ask them, hey, how many transactions did you do last year? Did you do five or did you do five a month? Right. And of those 60 that you did last year, what percentage of those were sold to real estate investors? Or were you working with the real estate investor? And if it was one out of those 60, okay, that, that's kind of telling. If it was 49 out of those 60, then maybe that's a, a different story. So I think just getting a sense of what percentage of their current client base is an actual investor will give you a better sense of if they're the right person for you to work with as well.
A
Okay, we have to take a short break, but when we come back, we're going to go over running the numbers and deciding how much to put down on a property we'll be right back.
D
There are two kinds of real estate investors. Those who have reviewed their insurance and those who think that they have. Most don't realize their coverage wasn't built for how they actually invest vacancy periods, rehabs, short term rentals or LLC held properties. These gaps surface only when filing claims. That's why investors work with nreg. They specialize exclusively in real estate investors understanding portfolios, risk at scale and cash flow protection. One claim can erase years of returns. If you own a rental property, don't assume you're covered. Have NREG review your insurance with someone who gets investing@nreg.com bppod that's N-R-E-I g.com bppod you insured the walls, the roof, the plumbing. That means the building is protected, but the business may not be. Most real estate investors cover the property. But if you run deals through an llc, manage properties, hire contractors or work with clients, landlord insurance only goes so far. It doesn't cover lawsuits, professional mistakes, workers comp claims or cyber fraud. That's where next comes in general liability for real estate businesses. Errors and omissions for agents and brokers, workers comp Cyber insurance coverage built for real estate operators, not homeowners. Protect your real estate business@biggerpockets.com next.
C
Most investors spend more time chasing deals than reviewing their insurance. But a quick coverage check can be fast, easy and one of the smartest ways to protect and even improve your property's cash flow. As the months get colder, frozen pipes, icy walkways and seasonal wear and tear can increase the likelihood of claims. And traditional insurance companies aren't always built to handle these claims quickly or smoothly. That's why more real estate investors are turning to steadily they focus exclusively on landlords. Whether it's a single family rental, a Brrrr Builders risk policy or midterm holiday guests, you get fast quotes, flexible coverage and protection for property damage, liability and even loss of rental income. Now is the perfect time to review your rates and coverage. Get a quote in minutes@biggerpockets.com landlordinsurance steadily landlord insurance Designed for the Modern Investor okay, welcome back.
A
This question is from Abdul in the BP forums. I've been running numbers for a while now and came to a conclusion that in today's market and going through Convent Loan, which is a half or a percent higher depending on your LTV and DTI, it is better to put 40% down and self manage to generate cash flow. Does anyone else run into this situation? I think this is a great example of not comparing apples to oranges. So when we talk about down payments and we talk about generating cash flow, you know, Tony can say I have this property and I generate $1,000 in cash flow and I can say I have the exact same property but I generate $500 in cash flow. And then I think Tony's doing better than me, Tony's got a better deal, blah blah blah. But you have to know the insides of the deal as to, well, Tony paid cash, he doesn't have a mortgage payment, that's why he is cash flowing $1,000. I have a mortgage payment, so I'm paying the mortgage, that's why my cash flow is less. So you have to look at other factors to actually determine how these deals are comparable. And one of those things to look at when you're deciding on putting up larger down payment is your cash on cash return or any down payment in general as to will the deal still make sense not only to generate more cash flow because Tony could be generating more cash flow but he could have more, way less return on his money and could have done better investing that money somewhere, somewhere else instead of dumping it into this property. You know, if he bought a $500,000 property in cash and he's only generating $1,000 per month, that's actually not that great of a deal in my opinion. So I would say like why look at the cash on cash return and not just look at the cash flow that the property is generating. And if you are going to self manage, I would still look at the numbers. If you outsource it, if there is some kind of change in your life that requires you to outsource it or you get burned out or you just don't like it, bake it into your numbers. So you know, going into it you can still generate some cash flow and keep the property afloat. If you were going to hire out the management piece.
B
Ash, let me ask you because I think that there's always nuance to this but I mean for Abdul to say very matter of factly that it's better to put down 40% and self manage, that's a very case by case basis on how we can actually respond and answer to that question. A lot of it comes down to the market that you're buying in. A lot of it comes down to the, the buy box that you're going after, the strategy that you're going to employ with that property. But you know, I think to say that as a rule 40% in self managing is always the best option is, is a Hard thing to state if in your market, Abdul, and for the specific type of property buy box strategy that you're going after, you find that to be true, then maybe the solution is not necessarily putting down 40%, maybe it's putting down 20% but going to a different market. Right. If you're in in an area where only 40% down works well, then go find one of the other 20,000 cities that do allow you to put down 20% and still get meaningful cash flow. With having a property manager, maybe try a slightly different strategy where instead of buying, you know, a single family home, maybe you're buying a small multifamily and maybe instead of doing a traditional long term rental, maybe you're doing rent by the room or midterm rental to short term rental. So I think if, if what you want is less down payment and to have a property manager, don't box yourself into looking at the same places you've been looking at because it's not working there. It doesn't necessarily mean that it won't work in a different market somewhere else.
A
I think the last thing too is the emotional piece to it. Like if you're going to put 40% down, is this like wiping out every dollar you have in your life savings and all your money is going to be tied up into this property? Are there other opportunities that you can use some of this money that may be a better opportunity? Also, would you actually sleep better at night if you had more equity in the property and did put that 40% down, would you feel better not having so much debt and you know, so much leverage on the property? So I think there's definitely an emotional piece. And also would you actually want to self manage the properties and do you have the time to do it? Do you have the skill set? Do you have the tools and resources to actually self manage? It is 100% doable whether you are a stay at home mom or you have a demanding W2 job, if you put the right systems and processes in place. We actually have a really great book on Biggerpockets. It's called the Self Managing Landlord and you can find that in the Biggerpockets bookstore by going to biggerpockets.com bookstore. Okay, we're gonna take our last break and we'll be right back.
D
You've upgraded how to buy properties, but did your insurance get the memo? When investors start scaling, insurance can't be an afterthought. Most policies were designed for a single property, not multiple rentals, LLC ownership, short term stays or properties mid rehab. That's where blind spots can creep in. NREG works exclusively with real estate investors. They understand portfolios, how risk compounds as you grow, and why insurance should protect your upside. Not just a checkbox One uncovered claim can undo years of progress. Before your next acquisition, review your insurance Talk to NREG and get investor specific coverage from specialists who actually understand real estate@nreg.com bppod that's N-R-E-I-Com bppod your rentals are insured. Your business may not be, because once you're running deals through an llc, managing properties, hiring contractors or working with clients, you're not just owning property anymore. You're running a business. And businesses come with opinions, paperwork and the occasional lawsuit shaped surprise. Landlord Insurance handles the building. It doesn't handle professional mistakes, workers comp claims or cyber fraud. That's where next comes in general liability errors and emissions Workers Comp Cyber insurance coverage built for real estate investors, not just property owners. Protect your real estate business@biggerpockets.com Next if.
C
You own a short term rental, here's something worth knowing. Not all landlord policies are built for your type of property. And with holiday bookings, chilly weather and higher guest turnover, having the right coverage is is more important than ever. Steadily offers insurance designed specifically for short term rentals, covering property damage, liability, lost rental income and even unexpected issues like bed bugs. Steadily works exclusively with real estate investors so they understand the details that make short term rentals unique, and they build coverage to match it. A quick review of your rates and coverage every year can help you protect your property and your cash flow. Get a quote in minutes@biggerpockets.com landlordinsurance steadily rental property insurance for the modern investor Tired of traditional lenders holding you back? Host Financial is here to change the game. They've ditched the DTI restrictions and they zero in on what really matters your property's income potential. So no more chasing papers for tax returns or personal income statements. Think about it. A lender that values your property's worth over your paycheck? That's the host financial difference. Approved in 47 states. They're ready to help you make your next big move. Curious if you qualify? Just head over to HostFinancial.com and find out. Stop letting outdated lending practices hold you back. That's HostFinancial.com where your property's potential meets unlimited financing.
A
So you're about to make a trade based on a friend's text, but which.
C
You do you listen to?
A
Is it? We could Buy a house in Tulum, get optioning those options. We could lose everything. Or let's do a little research. Get your head in the trade and make the investment decision that's right for you. Learn more@finra.org TradeSmart okay, let's jump back in to our last question here. This question comes from Craig in the BP forums. So I sold a property to someone and I carried the loan, as in they did seller financing. This person stopped making payments and I foreclosed on him. The property is now in my name, but he walked away and left everything from furniture to clothing and everything else. It's like he never left, though. According to neighbors, he hasn't been seen on the property for a good six months about the time I started the foreclosure proceedings. This is all new stuff too, not junk. I'm in Northern California and will be getting legal advice, just getting educated before I dig deeper into this. The man I'm dealing with has a history of frivolous litigation and dishonesty, which is why I haven't contacted him yet. What could he be up to and what are my responsibilities? Tony, once again, your backyard causing problems for landlords because they're so worried about what's gonna happen, what you could legally do.
B
Yeah, we. It's funny, we had a similar, somewhat similar issue with our hotel in Utah, where in addition to the hotel, it actually also came with 13 storage units. And we've had like such a hard time tracking down who owned the things that were in these units because we weren't getting paid for about half of them. And the previous owners didn't know that. They just kind of like didn't even worry about it. They're like, hey, you know, it's been there for years. We'll just leave it there. But obviously we want to be able to maximize that revenue. So we actually reached out to an attorney in Utah and explained the situation and got guidance from them on what steps do we need to take to, to do this. Now, obviously this is a self storage unit, which is different from a single family home where you had a lease and they didn't pay. But basically we have to go through this process where we put a, like a public notice in a newspaper. We have to give them a certain amount of time to reach out to us and contact us. And if they didn't, we had a day that we'd be auctioning off their things or selling their things or disposing of their things. But there was like a very clear legal set of steps. We had to take to dispose of their items without breaking the law. So Craig, I, I don't know what that process is in California, but I would assume there's probably some sort of path you can take given that you've already foreclosed and this property now belongs to you. Of what you can do with those items, it could be as simple as like, hey, you own the property, you own everything that's inside of it as well. That could be the simple answer. Or it could be, hey, maybe the previous person still has some claim to it, but I would probably just reach out to a good attorney, explain the situation and let them give you their, their best, best advice.
A
My guess is that you're going to have to do an eviction proceeding because in New York I know if you bought like a property that was foreclosed on from the bank, you buy it from the bank. If there are people occupying that property, you have to actually evict them, even whether they own the property or they had a lease or not. Like you have to do an eviction on the property. You can't just kick them out and throw their stuff out. And with this person being completely dishonest, and this is one thing we always make sure to do is like, even if like another tenant tells us like oh, that person moved out, they've been gone, blah blah, blah, they left. If they have like stuff in there and it's not like super evident that they have left or they haven't like given us like communication that they left the property, we like go through the foreclosure process of like having them served and like obviously if they're not there, we have it slapped to their door. The we always use a third party to serve the affidavit, you know, and then they sign an affidavit like saying that they tried three times, the person didn't answer so they put it onto their door. And then you know, when it's still, you know, no communication, nothing whatever, then we go through and start the eviction proceedings. So I'm assuming California probably has like a long eviction period just like New York does. But that is probably, I would guess what the recommendation is going to be is to start that eviction proceeding that you want them out of there. And obviously it wouldn't be for non payment. It would just be like you're giving them notice that you're no longer renting to them. And like, I know like some parts that I don't know if it's all California or some parts, but there's like something about, like, you know, if you, you can't, like, not renew their lease. So, like, there has to be something where this person doesn't even have a lease that, like, you can go ahead and evict them from the property. So. But I'm going to guess that's what your first step is going to be, is actually going through the eviction process. But I would say it wouldn't hurt to reach out to the person and to ask, like, did you vacate the property? Did you move out? And if you can get them, like, I would put this into an email and have them respond in an email. I want to, like, do this over the phone. But if you could get something in writing or like, better yet, send them something to E sign or like, have them, you know, sign something that's notarized saying they have vacated the property. So, like, you say, okay, they vacated the property. Next up, you're getting dumpsters. You're throwing out all their stuff. They left it behind. They have moved out. But if they. And then you have something that's notarized that stating that they, you know, moved out of the property, they're gone. Whatever. If they do try and come back after you for throwing in other stuff, you can, you have like, some kind of notice. But again, talk to, you know, your attorney. But I would guess that's kind of where you're going to be at, is starting the eviction process.
B
So, Ashley, let me ask, because obviously you, you know landlord tenant laws far better than I do. In this case, he sold the property to that person. So there doesn't seem like there was a lease in place. So you're saying even though there wasn't a lease, the simple fact that they had tenancy there would still force you to evict them even if the foreclosure had already closed. That's interesting. I wouldn't have thought that.
A
Yeah, like, like think about squatters. You could have not owned the property. You could have not had a lease, and you could literally go into the property and just say, hey, I live here now. And still the, the person would have to, you know, the owner would have to go and evict you. So, yeah, especially in California, I would say that, like, that's probably even more lenient of, like, being able to, that person have a claim to the property still.
B
Yeah. Some things just seem backwards. Right. Like, it doesn't seem right that, you know, someone could not pay me money completely, you know, not fulfill their obligations. And then I've got to run the the cost of getting them out of my property that they already weren't paying for. So I don't know. We've got to find a better solution for that.
A
Well, thank you guys so much for joining us today on Ricky Reply. I'm Ashley, he's Tony, and we'll see you guys next time.
B
Hey, rookies, if you're watching this, we want you to apply to be a guest on the Real Estate Rookie Podcast. That's right. Ashley and I are looking for amazing stories just like yours to be a part of our real estate Rookie podcast. Now look, you don't need to be an expert. You don't need to have done thousands of deals. Even if you've done one deal, your story could help inspire the next listener.
A
As a rookie investor. Especially if you just got your first deal. It is all fresh in your mind and you are the best person to tell your story, give your experience on how you got it done to help someone else get their first deal.
B
So head over to biggerpockets.com guest if you want to be a part of our show again. That's biggerpockets.com guest and we'd love to have you on.
Episode Title: This Matters More Than Cash Flow (Most Rookies Ignore It)
Hosts: Ashley Kehr & Tony J. Robinson
Release Date: January 16, 2026
Podcast: Real Estate Rookie, BiggerPockets
In this Rookie Reply episode, Ashley and Tony address three crucial questions from new investors:
The hosts break down legal, strategic, and emotional considerations for each topic, sharing personal experiences and actionable advice for newer investors aiming for their first few deals.
Reference: 01:11 – 08:23
No, it's not required:
Dual Agency & Off-Market Deals:
Value of Working With an Agent:
Critical Takeaway:
Selecting an Investor-Friendly Agent:
Reference: 11:28 – 16:41
Analyzing “Better” Cash Flow:
Cash on Cash Return vs. Cash Flow:
Emotional/Personal Side:
Plan for Change:
Reference: 19:12 – 26:20
Scenario: Borrower defaulted, foreclosure finished, but left belongings in the property in Northern California; borrower is known for frivolous litigation.
Legal Process and Cautions:
Eviction, Even without a Lease:
Squatter Laws:
On Finding the Right Realtor:
On Cash Flow Analysis:
On Emotional Aspects of Investing:
On Squatter/Eviction Laws:
The hosts keep a light, encouraging, and practical tone, emphasizing flexibility, due diligence, and self-awareness for new real estate investors. They openly admit when they don’t know specifics but offer clear guidance on what to ask, who to consult, and where to find solid resources (agents, books, legal counsel).
This episode demystifies several “rookie” tripwires—including relying solely on cash flow numbers, misunderstandings around realtors, and risks when tenants or borrowers vanish. The recurring message:
Do your homework, tailor your team and strategy to your needs, and always check local laws before acting.
For further help, find an investor-friendly agent, read “The Self-Managing Landlord” (available in the BiggerPockets Bookstore), or consult with a qualified real estate attorney for legal situations.