Transcript
A (0:00)
Welcome to a special episode of Real Talk Ms. This episode is sponsored by EMD Sirono, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany in the US and Canada. Please note that this discussion is only intended for a US audience. Joining me today is Amanda Montague, an Ms. Advocate working as Interim President and CEO of the Multiple Sclerosis association of America. MSAA is dedicated to the mission of being a leading resource for the entire Ms. Community, improving lives through vital resources and support. I'm also joined by Professor Elizabeth G. Cilius, a consultant neurologist with a special focus on Ms. At Oslo University Hospital in Norway, where she's group leader of the Ms. Research Group and also carries out research in epidemiology, genetic and clinical studies. Both Amanda and Elizabeth are active members of the Ms. In the 21st Century Initiative, better known as MS.21. MS.21 is a Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany Initiative involving healthcare professionals, people with Ms. And patient advocate groups. Please note that the discussions in this podcast are not intended to be interpreted as medical advice. Be sure to ask your physician for more information about your specific circumstances. Today we're going to be exploring MS.21's new consensus recommendations for the future of Ms. Care to understand what experts and people in the Ms. Community think are the priorities to focus on in order to improve care and help relieve the burden of Ms. That people experience. Elizabeth, I hope you'll start us off by explaining what these recommendations are and how they were developed.
B (1:48)
The MS.21 initiative was initiated in 2011 and in 2013 we published a consensus statement about how to treat Ms. Or the care for people with Ms. And time has gone by and the decision was to initiate a new version of these consensus guidelines, also including more comprehensive care. So the meaning of originally was how will Ms. Care look in the 21st century? What do we think is a minimum standard across the world and how shall we kind of align the standards across the world and across different treatment paradigms? So that was the initial thought and with 10 years of experience with this, we wanted to expand it and include information about the more comprehensive care, including burden of symptoms and their care. Not only the treatment, but also the burden of symptoms and the care. So that was the plan.
A (3:10)
Amanda, can you tell us a bit about what you've heard from people with Ms. About their experiences receiving care, how this has changed over the last 10 years and how this input informed your perspective in helping to develop the updated recommendations?
C (3:27)
Sure, and thanks for having us on. John. I think the biggest thing that we hear is people's challenge in getting a diagnosis still remains a real problem and then access to appropriate care. So we have a lot of folks who I think sadly are unable to access the resources that allow them to get the diagnosis in a timely fashion, such as MRI or are being under treated or untreated. And these issues really do impact the long term patient outcomes for folks. And so it's something I know all of us in the advocacy community have been working really hard to try to change. I think another challenge perhaps in the past 10 years has just been the wonderful explosion of disease modifying therapies available to people living with ms, which has, you know, necessitated a lot of involved conversations between people living with ms, their care partners and their healthcare professionals. And that's another piece that I think that we all try to work together to help inform folks in that process of deciding which therapy is best for them to be on.
