BREAKING! SOMETHING BIG IS HAPPENING AT THE CIA AND FBI RIGHT NOW, AS KASH PATEL CLEANS HOUSE

Summary

Redacted News: Breaking! Something Big is Happening at the CIA and FBI Right Now, as Kash Patel Cleans House

Release Date: February 26, 2025
Host/Author: Redacted.inc (Clayton Morris and Natalie Morris)

---

Introduction

In this episode of Redacted News, hosts Clayton Morris and Natalie Morris delve into some of the most pressing and controversial issues that mainstream media often overlooks. From allegations of evidence destruction within the FBI and CIA to the contentious topics of chemtrails and diversity in government projects, the episode promises a comprehensive analysis aimed at uncovering the truth behind the headlines.

---

FBI and CIA Evidence Destruction Amidst Kash Patel's Clean House Initiative

The episode kicks off with a significant discussion on the recent revelations concerning the FBI and CIA potentially destroying classified evidence. This development comes at a critical time as Kash Patel takes a leading role in these agencies.

Key Points:

• Whistleblower Allegations: Journalist Michael Shellenberger first reported that a source inside the FBI confirmed that employees were destroying evidence related to the Epstein files under Patel's leadership. Shellenberger posted, “[00:03:00] FBI whistleblower go back shell.”

• Expert Insight: Chris Piota, a 25-year FBI veteran and author of "The FBI I Once Knew: How to Restore Faith in the World’s Premier Law Enforcement Agency," joins the show to provide his perspective. He emphasizes the improbability of rank-and-file FBI agents having the capability to destroy high-level evidence without higher authorization. Piota states, “[04:39] If true and accurate, it would be very disappointing to hear that the FBI culture has declined to that point.”

• Internal Conflict: Piota discusses the internal ideological conflicts within the FBI, suggesting that partisan motivations may be driving the alleged evidence destruction. He notes, “[08:06] There's a war happening right now inside the intelligence community.”

• Accountability Concerns: The hosts and Piota explore who within the FBI hierarchy might be responsible, questioning the role of agency leadership and possible directives that align with partisan agendas.

Notable Quote:

“If true and accurate, it would be very disappointing to hear that the FBI culture has declined to that point.” — Chris Piota [04:39]

---

Chemtrails and Geoengineering: Unveiling the Truth

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to the controversial subject of chemtrails. The discussion is fueled by recent statements from Nicole Shanahan, RFK Jr.'s former running mate, highlighting an increase in chemtrail activities across the United States.

Key Points:

• Increased Activity: Shanahan expressed growing concerns about the prevalence of chemtrails, prompting Redacted News to investigate the transparency of the Trump administration regarding geoengineering practices.

• Expert Analysis: Dane Wigginton, lead researcher at GeoEngineeringWatch.org and executive producer of the documentary "The Dimming," joins the conversation. He presents evidence of chemical ice nucleation and cloud seeding operations, asserting that these activities are not natural phenomena but engineered interventions.

• Health and Environmental Impact: Wigginton details the toxic substances found in rain and atmospheric conditions, including aluminum nanoparticles and polymer fibers, which he claims are detrimental to both human health and the environment. “[34:09] Bioavailable Aluminum is toxic to all life forms, period.”

• Call to Action: Emphasizing the urgency of the issue, Wigginton urges collective action to halt these geoengineering practices, stating, “[38:13] The only way this stops is when we reach the pitchforks and torches moment.”

Notable Quote:

“Bioavailable Aluminum is toxic to all life forms, period.” — Dane Wigginton [34:09]

---

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Gone Wrong: The Obama Presidential Center Case

The hosts shift focus to the Obama Presidential Center's construction in Chicago, uncovering lawsuits alleging racial discrimination against minority contractors. This segment critiques the prioritization of diversity over competence in government projects.

Key Points:

• Project Delays: Originally slated to begin in 2018 with completion by June 2024, the project has faced significant delays, now unlikely to be finished until 2025. “Concrete contractors are suing, alleging they were hired solely based on their racial background and subsequently removed from the project due to underperformance.” [02:05]

• Lawsuit Details: Contractors from Thornton Thomasetti, the lead engineering firm, claim that enforced diversity requirements led to project inefficiencies. They argue that hiring based on racial criteria over experience was the primary cause of delays. “[02:48] They say you told us to just hire people based on their skin color.”

• Implications for Future Contracts: The episode raises concerns about the broader impact of mandated diversity on future government contracts, suggesting that contractors might avoid projects with stringent diversity mandates to prevent litigation claims of racism.

Notable Quote:

“When you prioritize race, it all goes to pot.” — Chris [02:48]

---

Joy Reid and Rachel Maddow: Media Accountability and Hypocrisy

Redacted News critiques prominent media figures Joy Reid and Rachel Maddow, focusing on the cancellation of Reid's show and Maddow's ensuing comments labeling MSNBC as racist.

Key Points:

• Show Cancellation: Joy Reid's show, "The Readout," was canceled by MSNBC due to low viewership. Reid publicly expressed her dismay, “[19:41] That. That what I was doing. Had value.”

• Maddow's Response: Rachel Maddow responded by accusing MSNBC of lacking diversity, stating, “[19:50] No, she's not.”

• Host Commentary: The hosts argue that the cancellation reflects a tokenistic approach to diversity, suggesting that maintaining diversity constraints may lead to less qualified hires and project setbacks.

Notable Quote:

“The engineers are saying, we probably should have gone with a more experienced firm.” — Chris [02:48]

---

Canadian Politics and Ukraine: Trudeau’s Unfulfilled Promises

The discussion shifts to international politics, focusing on Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's promises to support Ukraine amidst the ongoing war with Russia.

Key Points:

• Financial Discrepancies: Trudeau promised $5 billion in assistance to Ukraine from frozen Russian assets. However, investigations reveal that only approximately $140 million has been seized, leaving a $4.9 billion shortfall. “[50:01] It comes to about $140 million. It’s about $4.9 billion short.”

• Critique of Foreign Aid: The hosts contend that Trudeau's promises are a political maneuver to align with globalist agendas, thereby prolonging the conflict for electoral gains. “[50:04] More taxpayer money down the black hole of Kiev to keep this war going.”

• Proposed New NATO: Trudeau is accused of attempting to reshape NATO by excluding the United States and Canada, a move seen as both unrealistic and detrimental to global stability. “[51:57] If they do that, it’s just going to make matters worse.”

Notable Quote:

“You’re going to have constant people that use AIPAC to fund more of these wars.” — Dan [52:40]

---

Dan Crenshaw vs. Tucker Carlson: A Clash of Titans

A heated segment features Congressman Dan Crenshaw threatening to kill Tucker Carlson, igniting a debate on political confrontations and media accountability.

Key Points:

• Criminal Threat: Dan Crenshaw was recorded stating he would “kill” Tucker Carlson if they ever met face-to-face. “[57:27] He would kill him if he saw him.”

• Media Reaction: Tucker Carlson responds by challenging Crenshaw to an interview, which Crenshaw dismisses as cowardly. “[57:35] He doesn't want to do that interview.”

• Broad Implications: The exchange highlights the deep-seated animosity between certain political figures and media personalities, emphasizing the intense polarization within American politics.

Notable Quote:

“You’re the one that’s a globalist. You’re killing young children for no reason.” — Rachel Maddow [59:03]

---

Conclusion and Future Topics

The episode concludes with a preview of upcoming discussions, including an in-depth analysis of Fort Knox's gold reserves and their implications for the U.S. dollar. The hosts also emphasize the importance of supporting independent journalism and encourage listeners to subscribe to their newsletter for exclusive content.

Notable Quote:

“We cover the stories the mainstream media ignores.” — Clayton Morris

---

Final Thoughts

This episode of Redacted News offers a multifaceted exploration of governmental integrity, media accountability, and international politics. Through in-depth interviews and critical analysis, Clayton and Natalie Morris aim to shed light on issues they believe are being neglected or misrepresented by mainstream outlets. Notably, the inclusion of expert guests like Chris Piota and Dane Wigginton adds depth to the discussions, providing listeners with diverse perspectives on complex topics.

Remember: This summary is intended for informational purposes and aims to provide an accurate overview of the podcast episode’s content based on the provided transcript.

Transcript

[Clayton Morris]

Earn rewards with the IHG1 rewards Premier Business credit card. You can earn up to 200,000 bonus points with this limited time offer. Visit ihg.com businesscard cards issued by JPMorgan Chase bank and a member FDIC offer subject to change terms apply.

[Natalie Morris]

Check engine light on. Take the guesswork out of your Check engine light with O'Reilly Veriscan. It's free. Ask for O'Reilly Veriscan today.

[Chris]

Oh, oh, oh.

[Dan]

O'Reilly Auto Parts. Wake up, everybody. Welcome into redacted on this Tuesday. I'm Clayton Morris. So glad to have you all here on this show. We cover the stories the mainstream media largely ignores.

[Chris]

Did you say your name?

[Dan]

I think I did. I don't know. I had that double that double audio in my head.

[Chris]

Okay.

[Dan]

So I don't know what I said.

[Chris]

Did I say my name was Natalie Clayton Morris? Okay, I'm Natalie Morris. We're a married couple, former journalists for mainstream media. We come to you here from our own house where we bring you the stories the mainstream media largely ignores. We cut through the propaganda the best we know how. And so we're going to talk about today how the FBI has been caught destroying evidence in the run up to Cash Patel leading the FBI in the run up to the Epstein files revelations. If in fact we will get that. We said on the show last week that it feels like we have a big fish on the line, but it might just, you know, before you can reel it in. What is that called? Is there a word for that? The one that got away? That's what it feels like. Yeah. There must be a word for this. Clearly, I'm not a fisherwoman.

[Dan]

Also, we're going to talk about chemtrain. Why? We thought maybe with the transparency of the Trump administration that we would get some answers on these chemtrails in the United States, all over these different states. Now, there were some reports in the early days as Trump became the new president of the United States that in fact there were vanishing chemtrails across America's skies. Nicole Shanahan, RFK Jr. S former running mate, has just posted a social media post saying, wait a minute, we gotta get answers to this because now we're seeing more and more of these chemtrails across the United States. So we're gonna dive into this story today and whether or not we'll get some transpar from the Trump administration.

[Chris]

Plus the Obama library. This is an interesting story because it is years behind in construction in Chicago. Now they're being sued by contractors that say look, you tried to hire diverse contractors. I'm standing here black. I didn't do the job, but I was discriminated against and taken off the job because I was black. And you hired me because I was black. Will this be a template for contractors going forward? Don't put diversity in your job description. Just do the job. Well, I don't know that I would go into this building given the fact that the concrete contractor has said he wasn't able to do the job.

[Dan]

Yeah, don't walk in that building.

[Chris]

Right.

[Dan]

No. Oh, the. Yeah, the roofing, the roofing contract the flooring contractor did wasn't able to complete the job.

[Chris]

Well, we're going to look at that. I mean, this is what you get for putting diversity in the job description, in your goals. Like, you just got to build a building. That's what you got to do. So we're going to look at another DEI project gone wrong.

[Dan]

All right, let's get into the big story, though. The FBI, CIA potentially caught destroying classified evidence files servers as Kash Patel is coming into Clean House. Journalist Michael Shellenberger first reported this last night. Here's his tweet. FBI whistleblower go backshell. Who is, by the way, Garrett O'Boyle confirmed to me that a source inside FBI said that FBI employees were destroying evidence on servers and that he informed Cash Patel. I hope that he and AG Bondi, John Radcliffe, Elon Musk, Real Luna, Paula, are, excuse me, Paulina, Lula, are preventing this. We urgently need disclosure on this. And then to which Luna Congresswoman Luna then published that there's a war happening right now inside the intelligence community. So what is going on here? They're destroying evidence, they're destroying servers. They're trying to hide their tracks on their way out. Chris Biota is a 25 year FBI veteran. He served as the Chief of FBI Science and Technology programs. One of the top guys at the FBI. Here's his book, the FBI I Once Knew how to Restore Faith in the World's premier law enforcement agency. And Christopher joins us now to talk about this and what's happening inside the intelligence community right now. Chris, great to see you. Welcome to the show.

[Chris Piota]

Hey, thank you. Great to be here.

[Dan]

So first, your reaction to hearing from these whistleblowers? I mean, Garrett O'Boyle was an FBI whistleblower, as you know. You know, telling Michael Shellenberger that he has confirmed that there are FBI agents that are destroying servers, destroying evidence. What do you make of that at a high level? And what sort of evidence do you think that they're destroying.

[Chris Piota]

Well, first of all, I'd like to say that if true and accurate, it would be very disappointing to hear that the FBI culture has declined to that point. I need some more information on exactly what they were talking about as far as destroying servers and files because FBI line personnel, I mean rank and file FBI agents and professional support staff do not have access to those types of information technology equipment or to even remove, electronically remove files for destruction. So I have to get a little bit more information than that. The FBI's Information Management and data systems, they're all fully auditable, they're all fully traceable, and they're discoverable in, in for litigation purposes. So need a little bit more information to see about what possibly could be going on.

[Chris]

Right. This can't just be burning papers. It doesn't work like that. So we have to assume we have some sort of redundancy. But CNN piggybacked that report by saying that some people in intelligence, they named the CIA, but also possibly the FBI, could be motivated to take what they know to a foreign intelligence service. What does that mean? As if they would sabotage the rest of us and it. Because they're disgruntled or what? What would be in it for somebody to do that? What's the motivation?

[Chris Piota]

Well, it's a, that's been a standing threat forever. Anytime you have disgruntled employees, people who are fired, people who leave the organization with some under some sort of negative circumstances, there's always a threat that they can go to an adversary or a competitor and they can offer their information, experience, knowledge, or, you know, maybe even access to third party personnel who, who would, you know, cooperate. So it's always been a problem. And I think, you know, the intelligence community, law enforcement community, they police that the best they can, but it's not something that we can resolve once they're left, let go from the organizations.

[Dan]

Now you've had.

[Chris]

So wait, can I just clarify that point? So do you think CNN may be ratcheting this up as a fear, as a reaction to disgruntled employees because of Trump when it has always been a fear? Is it perhaps that we're being manipulated by the media to think that this is because of Trump?

[Chris Piota]

I think what you're seeing is maybe a little bit more highlighting on the issue now because of the, you know, the mass firings across the government and people are in fear for their jobs and there's a lot of disgruntlement right now, which again creates that, what people call the insider threat Inside of organizations where people with access to sensitive systems and information, once they're terminated and they leave with a bad feeling, they become highly recruitable by our adversaries.

[Dan]

So you're a 25 year FBI veteran, I imagine, and I'm speculating that you maybe have talked to some individuals who are still at the FBI who are maybe, I don't know, nervous or what are they seeing behind the scenes. Right now, as Kash Patel has come in, we're hearing Congresswoman Luna saying there's a war right now within the intelligence community. Is that accurate? What are you hearing from your sources at the FBI?

[Chris Piota]

What I hear mainly is that there's a lot of anxiety, a lot of confusion. They folks don't know what's going on. I don't know if the messaging has been as good as it could have been on some of the activities and telling people why certain things were happening. I think folks are left in the dark and it's creating a lot of just anxiety, I guess is the best word. But I will say that, you know, a war inside of the intelligence and law enforcement communities is, is probably not too far from being correct because there are some ideological differences inside the organizations. We've seen over the past four years, the FBI has been involved in certain operations, investigations and decisions that were seen as partisan. And I think that that's what the administration is concerned about right now is that those pockets of people or groups of people still remain in the organizations and they're still going to do things based upon ideological or personal politics.

[Dan]

Can we go back to the, the, the Michael Shellenberger piece here confirmed to me that a source inside FBI said FBI employees were destroying evidence on servers. A couple people in our chat room are saying, well, are there backups of these servers? Like if it was like high level individuals at the FBI destroying information on these servers, like what would this, you know, what would this be? And are there backups that we would be able to trace all of this?

[Chris Piota]

First of all, the high level officials at the FBI wouldn't probably know how to do it. So you're safe there. But most the FBI data systems are all backed up. They're all backed up.

[Chris]

Okay.

[Chris Piota]

And as I said earlier, they're fully auditable and traceable. And one of the things that people forget is that you can make something more conspicuous by its absence. When you have serialized to transactional information inside of the FBI's data systems and record management systems and all of a sudden there are missing parts, pieces, there are missing serialized documents, there are missing case file entries. It just draws attention by its absence. So there's no way they can do it without drawing some sort of a review or some sort of scrutiny in doing so. And my question would be, if, again, if true and accurate, who ordered this? Because the rank and file folks aren't doing this type of stuff, right?

[Chris]

So we're all left to speculate, what is it they are destroying, Right? A week ago, Pam Bondi said she has the Epstein file on her desk. I assume it's not a printout, so I guess, would you like to join in speculating what you think it is that they would in fact hide? Would it be Epstein related, Would it be Diddy related or what? I think where my mind goes is most likely a lot of them were led by the nose by the Biden administration to prosecute anything that was negative for conservatives. And they don't want those sort of marching orders. That's what I think. Do you wanna ring in on any of that speculation and put forth your own?

[Chris Piota]

You know what? I really wish that none of that was true, right? Because my former organization used to be one of the most trusted and revered in the federal government. And I sincerely hope that none of this is true and maybe it was a misunderstanding of something that was going on. But I will say that there are people, when put under pressure, will do some pretty wild things to try to save themselves. So I'm not saying it's impossible. I would just like to think that it's improbable that the FBI, one of our primary arbiters of, you know, fidelity, bravery and integrity, would be involved in that type of activity, Right?

[Chris]

Because could they say, yes, I followed this lead, this, I violated this person's civil rights because he was a January sixer, because this was the appetite within the Bureau. I did this because this is my marching order. But now is there that plausible denial liability of any of the agents who may be accused of partizan prosecutions?

[Chris Piota]

Well, first off, we have to remember the FBI does not prosecute anyone. The FBI conducts investigation investigations, excuse me, provides it to the U.S. attorneys. They do the prosecutions. So one of the things I'd like to just highlight really quickly is that, you know, DOJ Department, sorry, Department of justice asked for a list of people who were involved in the January 6 investigation. Reportedly came back, the Bureau came back with about 5,000 names. Now, I'll give an example of how people are going to look at this. If I was an agent out in Oklahoma and I got a investigative lead sanctioned by FBI headquarters approved by Department of Justice, and no objection from the White House. And I'm asked to go out and say, verify a physical address, take down some license plate numbers, maybe do some physical surveillance and report my results. I don't see anything. I may disagree. I may say, look, I don't think this is right, but it's not illegal. It's not, you know, unsafe. Nobody's going to get hurt. I'm going to go out and cover the lead. I'm going to report my results in. Now, I'm part of that 5,000 people. So I think what the department has to do is look at, was I a partisan actor? Was I doing this based upon my own personal ideology? Or did I follow an investigative lead, objectively, do my job, report my information, and then move on? So that's what we're trying to figure out. Now.

[Chris]

One of the things that Stephen Friend, the FBI whistleblower, had said about January 6th prosecutions is he had cooperative witnesses. They were working with the FBI, inviting them into their homes for interviews, and then they would hear nothing for a year, and then get a SWAT team at their house in the middle of the night. And so he says that the FBI needs to forfeit the cases where it violated people's civil rights. And so that, I think, is what I'm. What I'm asking for is, do any of those agents have any kind of excuse where they say, but this is what I was told to do?

[Chris Piota]

No. I think on some level, some of those agents may be excused from service. Right.

[Chris]

Okay.

[Chris Piota]

If they were out there doing some of those things based upon, again, political or personal ideologies, maybe the FBI isn't a place for them anymore. What I find is that the FBI leadership at the time sanctioned those operations, sanctioned those visits to people's homes with SWAT teams. And I'll tell you, when I was coming up in the FBI, when I was taught how to be an FBI agent by what I like to call the old breed of agents, that was frowned upon. We never did that type of thing. We never showed up to people's homes in, you know, military web gear and M4 rifles and SWAT type of operations, that was. That was considered to be kind of clumsy and ridiculous, you know, and SWAT was only brought out as an exception. So I'm not sure where the FBI's thought process was on those types of visits. But I'll tell you this. I blame 100%, the leadership of the FBI in marshaling those resources against people who were cooperative or they showed no threat and you know, the FBI could have done other things to, you know, bring them into the office or ask them to, you know, surrender themselves. There were other ways to do it, but they chose not to.

[Chris]

Well, thank you for that perspective. That's interesting. Did you have something else to say? Sorry.

[Dan]

Oh, no.

[Chris]

Well, thank you again for your time. We really appreciate that perspective because it's not one that we often get. So again, the book is Wanted, the FBI Once I Once Knew. And our. Our guest has been Chris Piota. We really appreciate your time, sir. Please come back on Redacted some other time.

[Chris Piota]

Love to. Thank you very much.

[Chris]

All right, well, we're going to talk about Ukraine. Are you ready for that?

[Dan]

I am.

[Chris]

Okay, let's do a little stretch and move on. What's that again about how the people of Ukraine stand with Ukrainian President Zelensky? Guess what? That's propaganda. We've been telling you that all along and clearly not true. As demonstrated on Monday, Monday by Ukrainian parliament when failed to pass a resolution that Zelensky himself put forward to affirm the legitimacy of the presidency. So again, this was a stunt of his own making, designed to show the world that the country supports Zelensky. But 54 members of parliament abstained from voting, including 38 representatives from Zelensky's own political party. So this was embarrassing and a failed stunt. What a loser. Now this tracks with what we showed you last week, that the so called 57% support that Zelensky says he enjoys in Ukraine is a farce. Clayton found last week that the organization that put forward this 57% number is a key of institute that just so happens to be a partner of USAID and the United nations and the who. Okay, well, today Russian President Putin said Zelensky would have no chance of winning reelection. This cannot be hard to believe, you guys. This is not a stretch of imagination. If you lived in Ukraine and you voted to support Zelensky in 2019 when he first came into office, because he promised to end the civil war in Eastern Ukraine. But then he went and turned it into a full scale war with Russia and all the military men that you know have either escaped the country miraculously or are dragged forcibly into the military, why would you support Zelensky? I ask you why? Why would you support him now? So again, this is proof that when he says Ukrainian people really want me, all politicians love me. That's propaganda. Please. You can support him if you want, but don't do it because you think you're supporting the Ukrainian people. You're not. You'd only be doing it because you're some kind of Piers Morgan fan of Zelensky, which I cannot understand why Piers Morgan continues to just be so effusive and defensive about Zielinski as a person on X. If you really want to see something perplexing, follow Piers Morgan on X and try and figure that one out for yourself. It seems to me like some kind of man crush. I do not understand.

[Dan]

I don't understand either. Even Tucker destroyed him in that interview. And it's still. He still didn't back down. Even a few days later. Came out and was incredibly effusive.

[Chris]

Yeah.

[Dan]

All right, let's talk about this. Liberals had a plan to win the election in 2024. Hurl insults at Trump supporters. You know, if they don't support Harrison Waltz, call them Nazis, call them MAGA fascists, call them garbage. That one worked really well. Then Trump got a garbage truck and drove around, totally blew back in their face. The last one didn't work at all. And the top media personality who led this racist charge was a racist MSNBC host named Joy Reid. Reid loved to call pro life Christian families fascists or call white Trump voters racists. This was her favorite pastime on her television show. And it's a shock that MSNBC now has canceled the show. Guess people aren't into that. The show was called the Readout. Well, Joy Reid is now out of a job at MSNBC because no one watched her terrible show to begin with. So she took to zoom last night to cry about her show and how it really had value. It brought you so much value. And that's why she's crying about it.

[Joy Reid]

Watch my show. Had value. And that.

[Chris]

I'm sorry.

[Joy Reid]

That. That what I was doing. Had value. Had value. And in the end, I'm sorry.

[Rachel Maddow]

I'm not.

[Joy Reid]

I try not to cry on tv. And I said, this is kind of like me on tv, so I apologize. And then. And then it kind of. And then it mattered. I see Karen is there and she's been texting me as well. And so what I will just say is that in the end. Thank you. Where I land is that the moment of guilt that I felt that I went hard on so many issues, whether it was the Black Lives Matter issues of a young baby or a mom or a dad that was killed, or when we opened up people's eyes to the fact that Asian Americans were being targeted and not just black folks that. Or went hard for immigrants who've done nothing but come to this country like My parents did and try to make a life and defended them or whether we've talked about.

[Dan]

So do you notice all the. I, it's about me. We, we.

[Chris]

I, I, like, I had to do it. I had to speak like this. And look, that's something that I can relate to. When we get called a Putin apologist or what have you, you know, then I understand how you might feel. I have to speak for the truth. The problem is, is that she showed that she was not willing to speak for the truth when she was caught two years ago on a hot mic discussing the Biden administration's dealings with Russia. The bump went to break and she said, trying to start another effing war about the Biden administration that told me that she clearly knew that, that the Biden administration was starting wars. Another means she knew she was studied enough to know this but refused to speak out. So that's why this rings hollow to me. I do, I have empathy. That must hurt because there might be some part of her that has compartmentalized and believed that she was doing the right thing. The problem is she spoke differently on a hot mic. She refused to speak out for death. So that's why I feel, I feel empathy, but not all that much sympathy.

[Dan]

I have no empathy at all. And I have no sympathy at all for these warmongers who would denigrate people and calling them racist for the way that they're voting and trying to sway an election in such way. Rachel Maddow says her network is essentially racist. So Rachel Maddow went on the air last night, basically called MSNBC racist because now Joy Reid show is off. That means, wow, we have no we. She said we have no non white hosts. Now, wait, wait, time slots.

[Chris]

Michael what's his face is taking one of those spots. The former head of the Republican Party, Michael Steele. Michael Steele. Last time I checked, he's not white.

[Dan]

Oh, well, tell that to Rachel Maddow. Watch.

[Chris]

Okay.

[Michael Steele]

An even bigger programming change is at 7pm 7pm Eastern, where joy Reid's show, the readout ended tonight. And Joy is not taking a different job in the network. She is leaving the network altogether. And that is very, very, very hard to take. I am 51 years old. I have been gainfully employed since I was 12. And I have had so many different kinds of jobs, you wouldn't believe me if I told you, but in all of the jobs I have had, in all of the years I have been alive, there is no colleague for whom I have had more affection and more respect than Joy. Reid.

[Dan]

Okay, so Joy Reid.

[Chris]

I just don't know if you guys saw like I read that she's getting replaced by a panel that have two blacks and a Latina.

[Natalie Morris]

So.

[Chris]

Yeah, yeah, that's what I was talking about. Michael Steele.

[Dan]

So that's racist.

[Chris]

Well, that's what Rachel Maddow said, is that the people who are keeping their jobs are not racial minorities. So that feels wrong. So those who have been replaced are only the minorities. Again, race grifting here. And she's apologizing to us like I still have my job probably because I'm white. I guess she's. That's very self denigrating.

[Dan]

Yeah. Well. Oh well. All right, let's talk about Obama's failed DEI library. So the Obama Presidential center is an example of a DEI nightmare. Take a look at this headline.

[Chris]

Well, this story was trending on X so we decided to look into it and read the litigation and it's a doozy. This is what the Obama center was supposed to look like when it's completed in Chicago. These are sketches. It's not actually built yet, but it has been delayed now. So it's a bit of a joke. Now the project managers are being sued for racial discrimination because get this, the project itself, the contracts I'm about to show you demanded diversity. Now the minority contractors are accusing the project managers of racism because they got behind on the job. They made this bed. So construction on the project was supposed to start in 2018, but it didn't really start until 2021. Part of that we can blame for the pandemic, but not as far back as 2018 clearly. Then they set a goal of completion by June of 2024. Didn't happen. Now they're saying maybe 2025, but that doesn't look likely. Look at the lawsuit that, that was filed last month against the project's engineers, Thornton Thomasetti. Now this is the engineering firm that is being accused of racism. I'm going to show you the page of the contractor who is the lead engineer on this programming. Uh, he's white. A white guy. It. I have to say that sadly because race matters in this story and proves that when you prioritize race, it all goes to pot. So the concrete contractors are suing. They allege that they were super excited to take this job because look, look, this was in their contract that the owner had to of the. Any contracting job that took this job on the Obama center had to be committed to maintaining an environment of diversity. You had to hire diverse. You had to have a Commitment to diversity, even if you're a concrete, a concrete layer. That's, that was in the job description. But what they say later is that when they were actually pushed to complete the job, not just stand there as a racial minority, but actually then do the job, they couldn't because they didn't have the workforce. They admit as such in their own complaint, this was a $92 million job. And they say here that they could not find the workforce to meet these diversity goals. So when they went back to the engineer and said that their costs were up and they asked for more money, the firm told them no. And then when the firm provided an update on the project to the Obama foundation, they blamed the concrete contractors and they said, well, obviously we are being blamed because we're black. And the, the, the, the engineer said, a more experienced firm could have done this, but we hired the diverse firm and that put us behind. And they're saying that's racism. They're saying you're indicating that a white led firm would have done better. Here's according to that update, they said this is the engineer saying that the engineers bent over backwards to assist what everyone knows was a questionably qualified subcontractor team in areas where a more qualified subcontractor would not have required it. What they're saying is, you told us to just hire people based on their skin color. We did that instead of hiring them based on their experience. Now our project's behind. So now the plaintiffs are saying, look, you said this and it's clear racism, because that is an obvious implication that the minority owned members of the concrete company were not sufficiently qualified to perform the work and that one or more of the minority owned firms were the true cause of the delays. So what they're saying, I mean, obviously there was no racial influence. The engineers saying, we probably should have gone with a more experienced firm. And because they hired based on skin color, they're saying racism. So they have to be wondering, what if we hadn't committed to a diverse workforce? What if we had just not vetted people for their sexuality or skin color, but actually their experience and looked at their bids and see who was the most qualified, who could do it the fastest and the best, stay on time, stay on budget. They were not allowed to do that. Bigger question, will other contractors learn to stay away from a project if it has diversity goals? Do not touch it because you'll get sued for being a racist if you want the work to actually be done? It's kind of crazy. Isn't that crazy?

[Dan]

Yeah, it's insane, but not surprising. You get, you reap what you sow. All right, we got a lot of news to get to today. Jam packed show. So we're going to keep it moving, guys, because we're going to talk about chemtrails over America. That is a big story because so many people want to know, why are our skies filled with these toxic chemicals? Maybe when Trump came into office, some of those skies cleared up. We heard reports saying, hey, I haven't seen these chemtrails for weeks. Nicole Shanahan, RFK junior's running mate, says we gotta get answers because they're all over her head. So we're gonna talk about that in a second.

[Chris]

But first, first we wanna remind you that Redacted is brought to you by Shopify. And in fact, Redacted is a customer of Shopify because the redacted store runs on Shopify. If you go to redacted store.com you'll see our platform running on Shopify because it is a great way to launch a store to the world, whatever it is that you have an idea to sell, whether it's friendship bracelets, paintings, what have you, dog bones. Shopify can help you from every stage of the process, from starting your website, getting your e commerce up and then launching it to the world so everyone can see what it is you have to offer and they have support to help you and you can execute quite quickly. For instance, the hat. We just showed you the redacted hat T shirts. When we have ideas, we can put them up on the Shopify site quite fast because they're really that flexible and easy to use. You can sign up for a one month trial period today at shopify.com redacted again, they have everything you need to grow your business. So upgrade your business and get the same checkout as we have at Redacted store. Again, that's shopify.com redacted. To upgrade your selling today one more time, that's shopify.comredacted.

[Clayton Morris]

Earn rewards. With the IHG1 rewards Premier Business credit card, you can earn up to 200,000 bonus points with this limited time offer. Visit ihg.com businesscard cards issued by JPMorgan Chase bank and a member FDIC offers subject to change term supply.

[Dan]

Well, now that President Trump is vowing full transparency, Americans are demanding answers to all of those chemtrails across our skies. RFK Jr. S former running mate, Nicole Shanahan just posted this on Social Media Watch.

[Chris]

I was taking the weekend off the Internet Been surfing this morning and was watching the planes flying overhead and then I just, I couldn't, I couldn't take it anymore. But that is not a contrail. That looked like it started as a contrail maybe, and now it's turning into a collapse. See how thick that is? You can see this one, it's a little further behind. This one's a little bit further behind as well. This one is the one that's been up there longest. The shit has to end. This is ridiculous. It's like an otherwise perfect day.

[Dan]

This has to end, she says. Dane Wigginton is the lead researcher and administrator for the website geoengineeringwatch.org, he's executive producer for the groundbreaking climate engineering documentary called the Dimming. I encourage all of you to watch that film. Dane has devoted the last 20 years of his life to constant research on the issue of COVID global climate engineering operations. And he joins us now. Dane, welcome back to the show. Great to see you. First of all, I just want to get your sense of where things sit right now. This has been a lifelong fight for you to get answers about this. You've pointed out that these are toxic chemicals being sprayed. You have the film footage of these planes spraying these chemicals into the sky. It's in your documentary. Are you hoping that you were going to see some answers here under this Trump administration?

[Dane Wigginton]

I was not holding my breath. And thank you, Clayton and Natalie for your continued attention to this extremely dire issue. The vast majority still have no idea the gravity of. In regard to Nicole, I did interview with her a one hour interview about two weeks ago. I'm hoping that that gets posted soon. I'm very grateful to her for her attention on this issue. What have we seen since January 20? We saw on January 21 the most aggressive chemical ice nucleation, cloud seeding operations we've seen to date. That was the blizzards in New Orleans, Florida, parts of Texas, along the Gulf Coast. At the same time there were blizzards there along the U.S. gulf Coast. We had above freezing temperatures and rain in Alaska, Greenland, Iceland, Siberia, Moscow. Nobody reports on that. So these events again. Blizzards on the Gulf coast with moisture from the record room, Gulf of Mexico. This is not nature. It's chemical ice nucleation, wild seeding, it's engineered winter. And this is. These are patented processes. Clayton and Natalie. It's not nature.

[Chris]

Wow. Can you just break down what she means? What's a contrail versus a chemtrail? Are they the same thing or is this vernacular?

[Dane Wigginton]

No, they are not. What you see is a sprayed particulate dispersion. We're not guessing. GeoEngineeringWatch.org and our groundbreaking documentary the Dimming. Over 25 million views on YouTube. In spite of draconian social media censorship, we took a National oceanic and Atmospheric Administration flying lab with top scientists, sent it to altitude, sampled what heavy aircraft were emitting, processed that sample at Rinser Polytechnic in New York. That's a world renowned lab. Found exactly what we knew we would find. Climate engineering elements starting with aluminum. Again, this is a sprayed particulate dispersion. We have up close photographs of these [e-mail], nozzles visible turning dispersions on and off. We have up close photographs of the retrofit nozzles mounted on the wing pylons aimed at the exhaust jet stream to make this look like quote, condensation. So no, we are not seeing condensation. It's a sprayed particulate dispersion. We have film footage of it. Endo argument.

[Chris]

I mean Dan, you've been doing it contrails. She's talking condescend condensation. That, that, that would otherwise be natural and she says this is not natural. I get it now. I'm sorry.

[Dan]

Correct.

[Chris]

Go ahead.

[Dan]

Okay, so what do you. I mean where are we then with this? I mean we have so many people in our chat room that are just sick of this. They're sick of looking up into their skies. I mean, I know I'm preaching to the choir here. Dane, you've devoted your life to this. They're sick of seeing this. We have so many viewers who have written to us saying how sick they've become as a result of it. Can you talk about what sort of effect this is having on human beings? What is it having this effect is having on our bodies? And then who the hell is doing this?

[Dane Wigginton]

It's affecting virtually every living thing. Primary element in climate engineering, operations and patents. Aluminum nanoparticles. Bioavailable Aluminum is toxic to all life forms, period. No exceptions. We are all sucking this stuff in with every breath we take. Clayton and Natalie, do you remember all the reports of the. It's ongoing in fact, the fog and people getting sick in the fog. You guys probably saw that.

[Chris]

Yes, in Pennsylvania during the, the atomic bomb or even further or. You're talking about recently.

[Dane Wigginton]

Oh, this is right now. This is in recent months. I mean we have extraordinary amounts of fog blanketing 10, 12 states at a time. Again, this is a result of chemical ice nucleation operations as well. Because when you're creating a cold, dense, chemically induced layer of air at the surface, you're going to expand any kind of fog layer that's there. And that's exactly what's happening. It isn't just fog in this fog, and people are getting sick, and that's not their imagination. Again, we're testing precipitation. So we know that we have aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, polymer fibers, surfactants, graphene. All of that is in our rain, which means it's in our breathable air column. Those are all climate injury elements. And Clayton and Natalie, have you seen how many massive hundred car pileups we have now? Every time there's a frozen precipitation event.

[Dan]

You guys noted that. I haven't been. I mean, I see postings on X and I haven't accounted for them. The quantity. So you're saying the quantity of these pileups has skyrocketed as a result?

[Dane Wigginton]

Yes, as has massive hail events. Now we have hail that's baseball and softball size all the time, destroying cars, solar fields. So on this slick material, surfactants are used in this mix. They're in the patents. And the stated purpose is to keep these particles from coagulating together and descending more rapidly. Surfactants are what makes soap soap. So now we have what amounts to soaked snow. It's unimaginably slick. And anybody who's grown up in snow notes the difference in composition in this super slick. What amounts to soap. Soap snow. So again, they're not only making the frozen precipitation, all precipitation toxic, but now there's many other dangers that come with that. And there's so much contamination in the rain, it's changing soil ph values. In our case in Northern California. And I have the USDA baselines from the 40s. I'm not guessing. Got that from a contact the USDA. So much toxic material is coming down in our rain that it has escalated soil ph values here in Northern California 10 to 12 times toward alkaline. Nothing is growing here. Soils are completely sterilized. There's no decomposition on the forest floor, and we're breathing all that.

[Dan]

So we have people in our chat room saying, yeah, let's see, Philly vortex this year, coating on the cars. I have someone else from Fresno saying, Fresno used to be the bread basket of California. No longer the case. Soil's being destroyed.

[Chris]

After watching your last bit on redacted, I don't let my daughter eat the snow that just falls like, can I, Can I eat the snow? No, you cannot. I want to ask you if you don't mind. Where would we begin if we wanted to get real answers besides your independent work? But where would we get begin to get answers from the government and make this stop? Or is it because there's it's too many tentacles?

[Dane Wigginton]

The only way this stops is when we reach the pitchforks and torches moment. The proverbial pitchforks and torches moment. When people realize they are literally fighting for their lives right here, right now. If we have soils that don't grow food and we have our own personal health that's deteriorating by the day, we're not going to be fighting anything for much longer. Bottom line, this will take everybody sharing credible data from a credible source. Geoengineering Watch strives to be that source. We don't say it if we can't back it up. And the bottom line, people ask why and they ask why over and over. Why would they do this to themselves? Natalie and Clayton, you've heard that question asked, probably, right? Why would they do this to themselves?

[Dan]

Right?

[Dane Wigginton]

So on that most important question we need to consider what quote they have done to themselves already. Detonation of 2,400 plus nuclear bombs which contaminated everything on planet Earth, including they. And they ultimately is those who print the money. That's who's running the whole show. Political strikes are not something that can stop this. I don't care what side of the fence it's on. It's only ramping up again in the January 21 New Orleans Blizzard was evident of that. They're not going to stop these programs. And we have nuclear everything. Fukushima, triple nuclear meltdown. No technology to fix it, no one in sight. That will be an ELA extinction level event if we can't figure out a way to stop that. We have 442 more nuke plants still online. We have 60 more being built. They, the proverbial they, those who print the money are power addicts. It's like a cancer. Does a cancer intend to kill its host?

[Rachel Maddow]

No.

[Dane Wigginton]

The cancer intends to proliferate unchecked until the host dies. And the stated purpose for these programs, so your listeners know Natalie and Clayton, is solar radiation management, Stratospheric aerosol injection, cloudal BDO enhancements. Important to use the science terms when introducing this issue, the chemtrails term. If people Google that, go straight to conspiracy theory and hoax. That doesn't help our cause. Stick to solid facts. But even though they state this as some sort of benevolent way of cooling the planet, it's doing exactly the opposite. It's Destroying the planet's remaining life support systems and contaminating everything in the process. And we know it's being used as a weapon because we see system systematic targeting of agricultural regions. Flash freeze, flash drought, flash flood. There's no question this is being used as a covert weapon of the controllers.

[Dan]

Wow. So many people in the chat are just saying, yeah, who is doing it? And I think you answered a big piece of this, the manipulation to darken the earth basically here. But who would be behind this? I mean, you know, I heard Julian Assange say something a couple of years ago and it stays with me, Dane. And I think as we look at the FBI and the CIA right now and who's doing this, this, the only way we get a change is to, as you say, pitchforks, overthrow these people, take it over. And you would think now we have these people in Washington D.C. we have President Trump there, we have these other groups there, we have these other individuals who are ready to throw it out. Do you think there's an appetite for them to do it, to really look this in the face?

[Dane Wigginton]

Well, keep in mind what we saw the day after January 20th was a radical ramp up the most aggressive chemical ice nucleation operations we have seen to date in the United States. In fact, so much so that there is international reporting on the fact that for the entire month of January, the most anomalously less warm region in the entire world was the United States of America. These flash freeze cooldowns where temperatures can drop 50 and 60 degrees in a day, that's not nature, that's a chemical cooldown. These are patented processes. Again, as far as those controlling everything, Clayton and Natalie, those who print the money control militaries, thus they control countries. And that's the bottom line. The last person to actually draw a line in the sand was John F. Kennedy. He didn't live long after that. So again, I think it's important we understand that we are the ones we've been waiting for. Us, all of us, all of us are needed in this battle. All of us are spokes in this wheel and needed and necessary to make it roll. If we're going to bring this issue to light and to a halt, it's going to take all of us. And I did interview with Robert Kennedy. He did a one hour interview on me that's online on geoengineeringwatch.org and we were scheduled for a second interview the day his mom died. That's unfortunate because that interview will probably never happen at this point. So it's up to us, all of us. And we supply [e-mail], we are non political. We don't advertise or sell and we pass on printed materials for less than our cost of producing and shipping. Our mission, my mission, my only mission, to see this insanity in our skies exposed and halted once and for all before there's nothing left of the planet's life support systems or our health.

[Dan]

Dane Wigginton, he's doing God's work. I hope everyone goes over to GeoEngineering Watch and check out everything that Dane has been doing with his team to expose this again. GeoEngineeringWatch.org, we'll have it linked up. Dane, thank you for jumping in on this story. We'll keep our eyes on it and please come back anytime.

[Dane Wigginton]

Thank you, Natalie. Thank you, Clayton. I very much appreciate your voice and God bless.

[Dan]

Thank you, Dane. All right, we've got a lot more.

[Chris]

This is anxietizing.

[Dan]

I know. It's Dane's doing unbelievable work on this. And follow the money. People are saying in the chat room, follow the money. Yeah, it's unbelievable. All right, we got more news to get to here on your. What is it? Tuesday?

[Chris]

It's Tuesday.

[Dan]

Yeah. Coming up next, we're going to talk about Trudeau. I don't know if you saw these globalists. They went to Ukraine and they offered Ukraine basically, hey, keep on fighting this war, keep on dying. And oh, by the way, here's billions of dollars. Justin Trudeau of Canada offered up to $5 billion in frozen assets to Zelensky. There's just one big problem with this big love fest. David Crayton is going to join us from Ottawa, Canada in just a moment. But first we want to tell you about our friends at Bunker. They've been a great sponsor for redacted. They are having tremendous growth and I want to tell you about them today. High net worth families, law enforcement agents, professional athletes, tactical response trainers trust Bunker to protect their lives from surveillance, cyber criminals and other threats. Join them and here's what you get. BUNKER is an uncompromised private message together with a password manager, manager, secure vault and notes that work seamlessly together. They have private messaging, they have password managing secure vault notes. All of it comes together in one application in over 130 countries. Bunker customers enjoy peace of mind. They can travel with greater ease and they have more energy to focus on what matters most. Download Bunker now from the App Store, Play Store or visit their website Bunker Light Life. Use the offer Code redacted to get 25% off. Live life to the fullest. Protect what matters most. Download Bunker today by going to Bunker Life and get 25% off when you use that code redacted.

[Clayton Morris]

Earn rewards with the IHG1 rewards Premier Business credit card. You can earn up to 200,000 bonus points with this limited time offer. Visit ihg.com businesscard cards issued by JPMorgan Chase bank and a member FDIC offer subject to change terms apply.

[Dan]

All right, Nurse. Nurse Natalie is in the house.

[Chris]

I saw that comment hurt my feelings.

[Dan]

So many people are calling you nurse today. You look like a nurse. Yeah, your bedside manner.

[Chris]

What about my bedside manner?

[Dan]

It's fantastic.

[Chris]

No, it's gentle and loving. Isn't it, everybody?

[Rachel Maddow]

No.

[Dan]

I'm blushing. All right, let's. On that note, globalists got together in Kiev yesterday to kiss Zelensky's ass. Provide some nice bedside manner to Zelensky and ask him to carry out more war against Russia. And offered up to $5 billion in frozen assets. Here's Justin Trudeau.

[Chris]

We're also dispersing the first installment of the $5 billion in assistance to Ukraine, funded through revenues from frozen Russian assets, along with providing a grant to help Ukraine maintain its energy security in the wake. Wait. In the wake of consistent, reckless attacks by Russia on Ukrainian energy infrastructure.

[Dan]

All right, so after that, he did some hugging and some kissing at the Ukraine of the Ukrainian dictator, his favorite little troll. Take a look. Give me a. Come here, big guy. Come here, little guy.

[Chris]

What a. What a real pleasure it is to be.

[Dan]

Can I take you home in my.

[Chris]

Pocket once again on this mic?

[Dan]

Back to Canada.

[Rachel Maddow]

Thank you so much.

[Natalie Morris]

Thank you.

[Dan]

Would you like some poutine? I can bring you some. All right. Thank you so much, Justin. It's so great to have you here. Sorry, no, that's my voice. Sorry.

[Chris]

Did you ever see the Wedding Crashers where it's like, coming in for the real thing?

[Rachel Maddow]

Yeah.

[Chris]

And he's trying to hug. Coming in for the real thing.

[Dan]

Come here, my little guy. I shove you in my little pocket. Take you back on the Canada Air flight. Our next guest just discovered this morning that Trudeau doesn't even have the $5 billion in seized Russian assets that he promised to give Zelensky. Shocking that Trudeau is lying once again. David Craden, independent journalist out of Ottawa who also writes at the Post Millennial. He's got a great YouTube channel as well. Crayden's right. He's been all over this. Follow David on X. So, David, shocking. There's gambling going on this establishment. He doesn't even have the money that he offered. So Zelensky in the first place.

[Natalie Morris]

It's this incredible story here, Clinton, and nobody's picked up on this. It's just amazing. Here's Trudeau over in Ukraine, aligning himself with the European Union. At the same time, Donald Trump is again threatening to invoke a massive 25% tariff on March 4th. Trudeau saying, poking his finger in Trump eye again, saying he's standing with Ukraine. But get this, he promises Ukraine 30 light armored vehicles. Count them, 30. Now, if they're not destroyed on the battlefield in a week, Ukraine will sell them to the drug cartels. You can bet we'll never see those again. But here's the kicker. $5 billion. $5 billion. He says he's going to send in assistance that he's going to take from Caesar. Russian assets. So we had a look this morning to see exactly how much money Canada has actually seized from Russian assets. You know what that, that sum comes to? It comes to about $140 million. It's about $4.9 billion short. Even when you include what the RCMP calls transactions that can't be completed, it's less than $500 million. So the cash, the actual monetary value that Justin Trudeau has actually seized in Russian assets, it's about $140 million. And he's promising 5 billion to you. Where's that coming from? More taxpayer money down the black hole of Kiev to keep this war going. Justin's war, he wants to keep this war going as long as possible. And do you think he wants peace in Ukraine? Not for a minute.

[Chris]

So is it possible? I mean, we're, we're using the word ceased, but he stole it from people who are just ethnic Russians or have a Russian passport and just like, oh, you're Russian, we're taking your money because, you know, the world is letting us do it. Maybe he has a plan to steal it from somebody else. Maybe he can go into Russia and do some thieving. I mean, you never know.

[Dan]

You could take all that fentanyl money that's coming across the Canadian border from, from all the Chinese shipments that are coming in. Maybe he could get some fentanyl.

[Chris]

Could he be stopping on the way back to do some burglary? Possibly.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, I, I totally agree. This, we, we talk about this as, like this is a legal action and this was, this is stolen money. Of course. And from the perspective of those who had it stolen, yes, it's downright Thievery. But the talk right now, Natalie, and Clayton, is absolutely crazy. I mean, here's Justin Trudeau inserting himself in peace negotiations where he's not only redundant, he's irrelevant. There's no place right now for Justin Trudeau.

[Chris]

He was not even invited.

[Chris Piota]

He was not even invited.

[Natalie Morris]

So what's he doing there? And it reminds me of the old line from Hogan's Heroes at major Hawkshed of what is this man doing here? He is always in the wrong place at the wrong time, parading around like he matters anymore. And of course, we're in the twilight minutes, hours, days, weeks of his prime ministership. He's promising to go on March 9th. We will see if that actually happens. But there's people in Canada, if you read the crazy mainstream media in Canada, not only saying good for Trudeau for standing up for Ukraine, heard the same thing, by the way, as you folks have pointed out time after time from our Conservative leader yesterday, Pierre Poliev, once again going to bat for Ukraine, going to bat for Justin Trudeau in lockstep with Trudeau, government policy on Ukraine, keep this thing going, keep funding Ukraine, keep pouring billions into this black hole of Kiev. And there's actually people in Canada now talking about, well, let's exchange the United States and NATO for Ukraine. Let's move the United States out. They don't seem to be interested anymore. And let's just have Ukraine join this military alliance that will be basically Europe and Canada. Now, that's a recipe for a disaster, of course, because the only thing that sustained NATO, NATO, for as many years as it existed, was US Military dollars and military spending. So don't kid me that somehow Canada and Europe are going to invent a new NATO that they're going to be part of. And of course, if they do that, it's just going to make matters worse. NATO is a thing of the past. It worked well for much of the Cold War. It is a relic of history. It's time to fold NATO. It's time to shut it down. It worked well and its time has passed well.

[Chris]

Even if Europe and Canada did, it would be a JV version of NATO. Right? So you can go ahead and tank your economy trying, but you know, the rest of us don't want that.

[Dan]

I can't but help think, David, that this is like trying to be a slap in the face to, you know, trying to set up the Liberal Party in Canada against Trump. Trump. You know Trump's position right now. He's about to hold peace talks with Putin. They're actively working towards a peaceful solution here to try to end this. And he's already sort of distanced himself from Europe in a big, big way. And Justin Trudeau aligning himself with the European side of this, trying to go up against Trump, Is he trying to set up sort of a spike for the Liberal Party against Trump as he faces tariffs and all of this going over the next few months before elections?

[Natalie Morris]

Oh, precisely. And I've been saying this for the last three months, this whole idea of a trade war with the United States is something the Liberal Party is just enjoying too much. Justin Trudeau started this. He loves the idea of a trade war. He loves the idea of telling Canadians not to buy American goods. He loves talking about retaliatory tariffs. Even though this is going to be a catastrophic trade war that's going to send Canada into the Great Depression Part 2 with a capital G and a capital D. This is going to be devastating. But the Liberals love it because they don't want to run against the Conservative Party of Canada. They want to run against that demon Donald Trump and his American empire. That's what the Liberal Party wants to run against, and that's what they've been successful in doing. And this is why I'm telling Pierre Palia, and I'm hoping to interview Pierre Pauliev next week or the week after. I'm saying introduce yourself to Donald Trump. He doesn't know you exist. Tell him there's a conservative alternative in this country to the Liberals that will work with the United States in a positive way so we can both prosper. But get off your butt and stop talking about Ukraine. Get concerned about what's potentially around the corner, literally within days. And tell Donald Trump to stop throwing a lifeline to the Liberal Party because they love this idea of a trade war. They don't care if Canada suffers. They don't care if we go further into decline, if we go into a great depression, because it's all about winning that next election. They want another four years. Mark Carney is their anointed leader. He's worse than Justin Trudeau. This is a globalist supreme. This is a man who is dedicated to the green energy deal, who's dedicated to net zero, who is completely committed to the WEF and its entire agenda.

[Dan]

Well, and Pierre Poliev is completely addicted to Ukraine. So I don't know what's going on in Canada, but David Crayton is always keeping them honest in Canada. Thank you for your honesty and your transparency and your great journalism up there as Always, David. Keep up the great work. Thank you, my friend.

[Natalie Morris]

Thank you so much. Always a pleasure to be here.

[Dan]

Thanks, David. All right, we've got more news to get to. But first, hey, subscribe to our channel because, you know, we never tell you to do that and it's free. So ask you where, we ask you. We're asking kindly. You know, just subscribe. We're live every day at 4pm Eastern time, so live from the Rocky Mountains, rumble.com as well. You can subscribe, follow us on Rumble and on X and YouTube. Just hit that subscribe button and be a part of our show. Please do that. We're going to talk about Dan Crenshaw, you know, the guy that wears the eye patch, threatening to kill Tucker Carlson. We're going to talk all about that. And why are these warmongers so angry at Tucker Carlson? They don't like that he's been calling out their bs. So we're going to talk about that in a moment.

[Chris]

But first, first we want to remind you that there is an option to subscribe to Rumble under a premium version. And if you do, you are supporting independent journalism. You might know that Rumble has been blocked in France. It most recently had litigation in Brazil and was blocked, blocked there as well. Why? Because they refuse to censor content because they allow content like ours where we can speak out against the war in Gaza, in the war in Ukraine, the war in Syria, the war in Yemen. I could go on, but I won't. That is one of the main cruxes of our channel is to be anti war and break down propaganda. A lot of places don't do that. But on Rumble, we are free to do that. So if you'd like to support them, and we wish that you would, go to rumble.com premium, you can save $10 and support freedom of speech when you use the code redacted. So check them out right now. And of course, we have other contemporaries, great Rumble creators like Glenn Greenwald, lots of other Rumble creators that we're proud to share the platform with. So again, rumble.com premium use the code redacted to save 10% and support free speech.

[Clayton Morris]

Earn rewards with the IHG1 rewards Premier Business credit card. You can earn up to 200,000 bonus points with this limited time offer. Visit ihg.com businesscard cards issued by JPMorgan Chase bank and a member FDIC offers subject to change term supply.

[Dan]

Well, yesterday Congressman Dan Crenshaw was caught on an open microphone saying that if he ever saw Tucker Carlson face to face, that he would kill him. Watch. Have you ever met Tucker? We've talked a lot.

[Chris]

He's the worst person, he says, yeah.

[Dan]

So he threatened to kill Tucker Carlson. Then Congresswoman Marguerite Taylor Greene asked him if this was true on social media. She posted this, said, hey, Dan Crenshaw, did you threaten to kill my friend Tucker Carlson? To which Crenshaw replied, lol, no, but we saw the video. And then the reporter who was interviewing him actually confirmed the exchange. Steven Edgington said, after our interview, I asked Dan Crenshaw if he had ever met Tucker Carlson. He said, I would kill him if I saw him. I laughed it off, but then he said, no, seriously, I would kill him. Then Tucker responded, last night, why don't you come sit for an interview and we'll see how you do. I'll send you my address. Dan Crenshaw. So I asked Tucker today if Crenshaw responded, and Tucker just laughed and said, no, he's a coward. Of course he is. So I don't think he's going to do that interview. Maybe since I talked to Tucker this morning, maybe that's changed. I don't know. Probably not. He doesn't want people calling him out as a rhino, as a globalist warmonger. Just like Alex Stein did when Crenshaw sent $80 billion to Ukraine. Watch Alex confront him on the street.

[Rachel Maddow]

Is there an invasion? Will you admit that there's invasion on our borders?

[Dane Wigginton]

There's an invasion on our border.

[Chris Piota]

Yeah, but you won't do anything about it.

[Rachel Maddow]

But why do you give 80 billion to Ukraine? Why do you give 80 billion to Ukraine? I think you're getting the numbers wrong there, buddy. Oh, what are we at 100 billion now?

[Chris]

No, it's not even close.

[Rachel Maddow]

What are we up to now?

[Dan]

350 billion.

[Rachel Maddow]

None of those weapons even go to the front lines. So why don't you start caring about America? You don't care about America at all, Dan. You're a globalist. You're a traitor. You're a dwarf. There's Dan Crenshaw.

[Chris Piota]

Come on. Come on, dude.

[Rachel Maddow]

You're the one that's a globalist. You're killing young children for no reason, sending them to war for nothing.

[Dan]

Exactly. 100%. Alex Stein is the host of Primetime with Alex Stein on Blaze tv. Huge fan of Alex and great to have Alex here on the show. Great to see you.

[Chris]

Maybe one of the first questions we have is, where do you get the huevos?

[Dan]

Yeah, that's balls.

[Rachel Maddow]

I think I was just raised by bail bondsen by. I grew up In Dallas. My dad's a Bill Bunton. So I was kind of raised by my dad. Could never get a good babysitter. So he would always have to have the ex convicts that he got out of jail to raise me. So I think that's why I'm so upset.

[Dan]

I love it. We need more of that. We need more ex cons raising people like that and confronting our politicians. I mean, you know, Tucker took it in stride. He just wants to sit down and have an interview with him. But of course he's a coward, he never will. And these globalists don't want to confront the fact fact that they are supporting these endless wars. The military industrial complex in the United States that's now killed the numbers I've seen, According to reports, 1.08 million Ukrainian men are now killed as a result of this boondoggle that started back in 2014 with the military industrial complex and the CIA fomenting this war back in 2014 and a CIA backed coup. So they don't want to confront this. Right. They're going to just continue, continue to hide from people like Tucker.

[Rachel Maddow]

Well, Clayton, you've talked about this and I didn't even get to say thank you for having me on, but you've talked about this. We can look into 9, 11 and whether you think that the government had prior knowledge, I guess they admit that, and whether you think it's an inside job or not, that's fine. But what we do know is that the government lied about weapons of mass destruction. They said that they had these weapons and that they had to go over there, invade these countries and kill these millions of people for weapons of mass destruction that did not exist. What makes Dan Crenshaw so disgusting is that he knows that he fought a war based on a lie and he does not care. He lost his eye. And I appreciate the service that he did in protecting our country, but the fact that he's a globalist and he wants to send more young children to go lose their eye for a war that doesn't matter. And like you said, I believe it's 1 million Russians, over a million people. I think It's a total 2 million people I believe are dead almost in the Ukraine. So it's absolutely insane the lack of empathy that these politicians have. And that's true. If Dan Crenshaw could kill Tucker Carlson, he would do it. I'm not even kidding. He was not joking around. That was a serious statement that he said to that reporter.

[Chris]

And do you think it's specifically the war In Ukraine, where they have the largest factions because Tucker has been willing to speak out about the war in Gaza and Israel's continued assault on civilians. Not just Hamas, but civilians. So could it be that is adding fuel to the fire or just one big bonfire?

[Rachel Maddow]

Well, of course, Natalie. But you know what really makes my, you know, it just makes me so mad, my blood boil about the Gaza Strip. Did you guys see this? And I'm sure you guys like this, where they did have a temporary cease fire so that they could vaccinate Palestinians. So did you guys see this? You guys know what I'm talking about? No, this is true. Look it up. This is real. That they had a temporary cease fire so that they could vaccinate Palestinians if they're willing to do a temporary ceasefire to vaccinate their enemies that they supposedly want to kill. Deal. It's all fake. It's all bs. It's literally a waste of time. And is Trump's plan going to work? Going and turning the Gaza Strip into Orlando, Florida? I don't know if that's going to work either. I think a two state solution is probably the only actual fair thing. But what's happening in the Gaza Strip right now, it's not going to be a fair solution. So we have these people like Dan Crenshaw that benefit from all of the military surplus that they sell to all these countries. You're going to have constant people that use AIPAC to fund more of these wars. So I really don't know how we stop it. Clayton and Natalie, it's only going to get worse unless we have people like you with all these viewers speaking out against it.

[Dan]

Well, I appreciate that. I mean, I think. Well, and Dan Crenshaw, I mean, he's, he's really the, he's emblematic of this kickback machine. I want to know, I would love to know how much of these guys are part of this money laundering operation because you saw as Trump started to make peace agreements with Putin, started to talk peace and what the plans were there, all the, all the, like the Dan Crenshaws of the world, the Rhinos, they all started coming out of the woodwork. You saw Nikki Haley coming out, you saw Mike Pence, they all came out like termites. Like within 24 hours they came out of the ground and they all started telling us we need to stand with Ukraine. It's like, how much of this money are these guys getting?

[Rachel Maddow]

Well, I don't know how much money. I know Dan Crenshaw's stock portfolio is doing very well, but you and I both know, we all know that the way this war is going to end, end the Donbass region is probably going to be autonomous or people are going to be able to say they're Russian or they're going to be able to say they're Ukrainian, and then they're. And Ukraine's not going to be able to join NATO. And that's exactly what Russia wanted from the start. So millions of people literally died for absolutely nothing. And you know what's really sad is that when this war is over, we're going to memory hold this. We won't even talk about it. Just like nobody's talking about how a Blackhawk helicopter just ran into an American Airlines flight, you know, into the. In the nation's capital. Like, we don't even talk about that anymore. So watch this. You train more, they'll forget about it like that.

[Dan]

It's deeply destroyed. I mean, so do you think that this, in your interactions with Dan Crenshaw, we'll get you out of here on this, Alex. Do you think he's going to sit down with Tucker Carlson? Do you think he'll actually be a man and sit down and actually do an interview?

[Rachel Maddow]

Well, he never could because, listen, you can talk all day long. There's a lot of rhinos that say they're conservative, but there's just some few basic tenets. It's like we want individual liberty and we want limited government. Government. Dan Crenshaw does not want those two things. So if he has to speak to a guy like Tucker, who are. Those are two of his main principles when it comes to his morals and values and ethics, then obviously he's going to win in any sort of debate against Dan Crenshaw. So Dan Crenshaw probably only could look bad by going on Tucker, and Tucker will look awesome. But you said it. Tucker said it. Dan Crenshaw is a coward. Dan Crenshaw is the last guy that wants to go and actually take a chance to maybe, maybe start a conversation. Maybe his point is the correct point, but he'll never go and debate it against a guy like Tucker Carlson because he is just a coward and a fraud and a liar and a dwarf.

[Dan]

Who needs a diaper change. He's about Zelensky's height. Alex, great to see you. Keep up the great work. Thank you so much for jumping in on this. It's amazing. We'll see if he actually does the interview. Thanks so much, Alex. We appreciate it.

[Rachel Maddow]

And one thing I just want to say, you guys have done such great work over the last few years and to see you guys grow and the success you've had, had and you spoke out about a lot of subjects during, you know, Covid and 911 and a lot of stuff that I know that you could get canceled for. So I really appreciate you, Clayton and.

[Chris]

Natalie, thanks for saying that.

[Rachel Maddow]

And I'm not trying to kiss your butt. I mean that because I talk about these comedic way, but, but it's hard because I get strikes and I get censored. So I imagine, I see you take.

[Dan]

It, I mean, yeah, the, the way that you take it to these people is unbelievable and I don't know that I would have the courage to do that. So. So keep up the amazing work, Alex. And it's great to have like minded people on our show.

[Chris]

Before we let him go, can I ask you, do you think the temperature is different now because we. Yes, you're right. We took a lot of abuse. We got punished a lot for the things, the topics we dare to cover. But it does feel a little bit more like we have some wiggle room. Do you feel that?

[Rachel Maddow]

Well, for sure. But this is what's going to happen, Natalie, and you guys know this because it happened during the pandemic. Things are going to be great, you know, in the next year. But watch these people, these deep state globalists that are threatened by Trump, they're going to get more desperate as the clock starts ticking and they see, you know, a successful presidency for Trump could lay the groundwork for J.D. vance and other anti establishment candidates. So I just imagine that things are going to be good for a little bit and then they're going to just kind of amp it up when it comes to the social justice issues, the trans stuff, the George Floyd type events. So God bless America. Right now we are really living large. But, but what do they say when something's really good is happening? Just wait a second. And you just never know what's behind, I guess that third door. And I do think one day and probably sooner than later because we're gonna get more desperate, weird stuff will start.

[Dan]

Happening and desperation comes from us taking away their money. And that's really what we're seeing right now as these people are protesting and taking to the streets about USAID and all of their money drying up and all these kickbacks. Take away their money and that's when you're start to see these desperate people.

[Chris]

Yeah.

[Dan]

Yeah, you're right about that. Alex, great to see you. Thank you for the great work and thanks for your Great sense of humor. We need more of more people like you and covering these stories. We appreciate it. Thanks, Alex.

[Rachel Maddow]

Talk to you guys later. Have a good one.

[Dan]

Thanks, Alex. That's great.

[Chris]

Well, I hadn't really thought about that. I thought, like, oh, good, we can say these things now. I hadn't thought that there would be a boomerang event. So I guess there's still work for us. There's a lot of work you got to stay on. Redacted, everybody.

[Dan]

Jamie Dimon just spoke out about how much work needs to be done in the. In the government right now. You know, you want to cut a trillion dollars out of it. Yeah, that's just 1. 1 trillion out of the massive amount of waste and fraud and abuse that they're spending right now. So there's a lot of work to be done. But a lot of this money was phony money, and it was propping up people. Like, Alex was just talking about all of these deep state people who made so much money off of it, all of these, like, DEI programs. And I don't know if you saw the. Was it Congressman today, Whitehouse House, all the kickbacks. Money was flowing into his wife's coffers. So it's like, oh, the spouses. Like all this money that was flowing through Washington, D.C. yeah. You cut off their money supply, and they're going to start to get really angry.

[Chris]

Also, please don't make fun of short people. That hurt my feelings.

[Dan]

It's fine for women. I mean, you know, but a little troll. A little troll like Zalinsky.

[Chris]

Okay, how tall are you?

[Dan]

I'm six two. You're five four.

[Dane Wigginton]

We're.

[Chris]

We're a foot apart.

[Dan]

Yeah.

[Chris]

So I'm five two and he's six two.

[Rachel Maddow]

Yeah.

[Chris]

When I don't wear any heels anyhow.

[Dan]

I can pick her up and put her in my pocket. Come on, little Natalie. Let's go shopping today.

[Chris]

Okay, well, that's gonna do it for us today on redacted. Hey, tomorrow, guess what? I invited Lionel from the Lionel Nation YouTube channel to talk about how all these judges are blocking the Trump administration from freezing federal aid. He's going to tell us once again whether or not this is legal, because that's crazy town. What else do we got? Tomorrow we're going to talk about Fort Knox.

[Dan]

We're going to talk about Fort Knox. And we're ready to go see what's going to happen at Fort Knox. Is there actual gold at Fort Knox? We've got a gold expert on the show tomorrow to dive into what does this actually mean for the US Dollar? What is the value of the current gold supply in Fort Knox? And what happens if they don't find any gold there? This is good. And you know, President Trump just spoke out about this yesterday, saying he's going there because he thinks it was stolen. So is it fake gold? So we're going to talk about all of that and so much more. So we got a busy Wednesday for you guys. Thank you guys for subscribing. Thank you for being here as part of our community. Oh, we should mention we have a free daily newsletter you should subscribe to. It comes to your inbox first thing in the morning. It's the world's best newsletter. We cover. We cover the stories the mainstream media ignores. And Google labels us as a dangerous newsletter letter. So if you get it through Gmail, it might go into your dangerous folder or they might send you an alert saying it's dangerous. Just go to redacted.inc put in your email address, sign up. You'll receive a welcome email from me, just claytonredacted.inc is my email address. And then just put it in your inbox and then you'll receive it Wednesday morning when we publish the newsletter. First thing. You can read in about five or 10 minutes over your cup of Joe. First thing in the morning.

[Chris]

Somebody in the chat says, clayton, buy her a diamond. I don't wear diamonds.

[Dan]

She doesn't like diamonds. I got off lucky with that.

[Chris]

Yeah, I like pearls.

[Dan]

I did buy her those earrings. Yeah. So I got her some nice earrings.

[Chris]

But thank you for the advocacy. I appreciate it very much. We'll see you here tomorrow. Everybody. Please come back. Thanks for being here.

[Clayton Morris]

Earn rewards with the IHG1 rewards Premier Business credit card, you can earn up to 200,000 bonus points with this limited time offer. Visit ihg.com businesscard cards issued by JPMorgan Chase bank and a member FDIC. Offers subject to change term supply.