← Redacted News
Redacted News
Charlie Kirk's Text Messages Confirmed Accurate By Tpusa, Days Before Assassination | Redacted News
01:38:41
Loading summary
Transcript238 lines
- [00:01]
Commercial Narrator
If you're a smoker or vaper ready to make a change, you really only need one good reason. But with Zen nicotine pouches, you'll discover many good reasons. Reasons like Zyn nicotine pouches are still America's number one choice for smoke free hands free nicotine satisfaction or because you can choose between 10 varieties each available in either 3 or 6 milligrams of nicotine satisfaction or even because Zynn offers a robust rewards program full of prem items and experiences. How's that for good reasons? Now, if you're still unsure whether Zynn is the right change for you, there's only one way to find out. Check out zyn.com find to find Zynn at a store near you, you have a lot of options when it comes to nicotine satisfaction. But there's only one Zyn warning. This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical. Shoe shopping should be fun and full of surprises. DSW has never ending options for every style, mood and occasion, all at really great prices. From sneakers to boots and everything in between, DSW makes it easy to discover the styles you love and maybe even a few you didn't expect. Whether you're shopping in store or online, you'll always find fresh looks at prices that make sense. Find the shoes that get you at prices that get your budget at DSW stores or dsw.com foreign.
- [01:46]
Clayton Morris
Hey everybody. Welcome into Redacted on this Tuesday. I'm Clayton Morris.
- [01:49]
Natalie Morris
I'm Natalie Morris.
- [01:50]
Clayton Morris
And on this show we cover the stories the mainstream media largely ignores. We have no agenda other than the truth. We are not sycophants for any political party. We abhor the uniparty. By the way, we got a busy show for you on this Tuesday. We're gonna talk about the receipts that Candace Owens has brought and now confirmed by TP USA that those text messages with Charlie Kirk were in fact accurate and real. But there's a larger basically massive money campaign right now, an Israeli money campaign that's really trying to push American audiences to fall in love with Israel once again.
- [02:24]
Natalie Morris
Which is why if you're like me, your feed may be chock full of people. It doesn't matter. These texts don't matter. She's crazy. Don't pay attention to her. I wonder though, if you died in mysterious circumstances, if you would want your friend to continue to ask questions. So we're gonna look at that. We're gonna look at these ice free cities. How now President Trump is sending the National Guard to certain places with high crime rates. Does he have the authority to do that or doesn't he? We're gonna talk with Judge Knapp about that. I'm excited about his take. Also, this is crazy. New medical journals are trying to push you away from your inhalers because they say they're ruining the planet. This is so crazy. We're gonna look at this propaganda to take away people's inhalers because of climate change. The climate change lunatics have come up with one more thing that they think it's so dumb. It's beyond dumb.
- [03:17]
Clayton Morris
Maybe that's an inhaler full of cow farts. It'd be fine for them, I don't know. Because then you'd be inhaling cow farts and they'd be like, hey, that's great for the environment. You're getting rid of all that cow methane. These idiots have got to stop. Also, we're gonna look at three I atlas today and why it just passed by Mars. But why is NASA hiding the high definition images that it has of this craft or whatever this thing is? Why won't they release them? Astronomers have managed to get some low res images from the Mars orbiters and the Mars craft that are sitting there right now. But why is NASA hiding the high definition images that happened on October 3rd and 4th? Like, what's going on? NASA, we have a lot of answers we're gonna look into today. But first, you guys heard about the bearskin hoodie, right? So many of you have bought one. By the way, I've heard from so many of you that picked up. I'm wearing mine right now. It just got cold. Literally went from like 85 degrees or 90 degrees to like 40 degrees here in the Rocky Mountains. So walking the dog. Got my bearskin hoodie on. I made my son yesterday mow the lawn for probably the last time of the season right now. Cause it's getting. The frost is ready to come. And he was out there freezing. I said, go get your bearskin. And he's like, oh yeah. So he has one. He ran in and he finished mowing the lawn wearing his. These are fantastic. It's my favorite hoodie. It's our tactical hoodie. These things are built like a tank. Plus you can put all the cool patches on the side too. I've got my don't tread on Me right here. But right now, bearskin is running a 60% off sale right now. But only if you get your hoodie early. Grab one for Christmas, buy one for your husband, buy one for your loved One in the family. Natalie has one as well. This hoodie is built like a tank. 340gsm micro fleece, 10 pockets. A clean, rugged fit that looks awesome. Plus, it zips right into the heavy storm rain jacket as well, which becomes 100% waterproof when you need it. So if it gets cold, wet, windy out there, you're not scrambling at the last minute. Just throw it right over top and you're locked in, ready to go. So right now, text the word redacted to 36912 to lock in your 60% off. Again, text the word redacted to 36912 to get a link sent straight to your phone. You can check it out later. If you're busy. Right now, don't wait till you're freezing to realize that your hoodie sucks. Go get bear skin. Right now, 60% off, text the word redacted. 3, 6912 is the place to go. Well, with the government shut down and ICE agents and National Guard pouring into liberal cities like Chicago and Portland, Democrats are warning that we are heading for a civil war. Where have we heard this before? They trying to scare us once again. Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat, now says, expect a civil Civil War style uprising across this country. We are gonna fight. With the government shut down, now is the time for liberals to fight back against ICE and the National Guard. He warned months ago, by the way, that he was going to fight in the streets. Watch.
- [06:06]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
We are gonna fight it in the courts and we're gonna fight it in the streets.
- [06:13]
Clayton Morris
Now you have these activist judges who are trying to block Trump's moves into these cities, and liberal mayors now enacting what they're calling ICE free zones across the city. ICE isn't allowed to do their job, essentially. In Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson just signed an executive order setting up one of these ice free zones. Just signed that executive order. Judge Andrew Napolitano is the host of Judging Freedom on the great Judging Freedom podcast and one of the smartest people that we know. And when all of this is hitting the fan, you get the liberals on one side, you get the conservatives on the other, you get the Trump administration saying one thing, you get liberal mayors saying another thing. We wanna go to the judge to get the truth here. Judge, great to see you. I guess let's unpack these ice free.
- [06:57]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Zones with both of you. Thank you.
- [07:00]
Clayton Morris
Always great to have you, Judge. So when you look at Brandon Johnson in Chicago, in these ice free zones, in this executive order, does it have any teeth? And what will the Trump administration be able to do.
- [07:12]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
The short answers are no and. And almost whatever it wants if it follows the law. So when the Feds come into a municipality to enforce a federal law, the feds are superior to local law enforcement. They cannot commandeer local law enforcement to help them or to do their job for them, but law enforcement cannot interfere. So as offensive as it is to some people for ICE to be wearing masks, a California statute prohibiting law enforcement from wearing masks is enforceable only against California law enforcement, not against the Feds. I mean, the short answer is that the state can look the other way and not help the Feds, but it cannot aggressively interfere with. The problem with ICE is that it is using an instrument which has never been ruled on by the Supreme Court, to effectuate these arrests. And it's called an administrative warrant. It is not an arrest warrant based on the Constitution. It is something crafted by low level courts to make ICE's job easier for it. There is no standard that ICE must meet in order to effectuate the warrant. So if they walk into a warehouse or an industrial facility where they see people who look like they're Hispanic and they say in Spanish, who here speaks Spanish? And everybody raises their hands, they proceed to arrest those people. Now, speaking Spanish or raising your hands is not evidence of any criminality and would never hold water if the Fourth Amendment were applied, which says arrests can only occur pursuant to a warrant based upon a probable cause sworn to by a judge. However, because this is a quasi public place where ICE can just walk in a warehouse, it's private property, but it's quasi public, meaning anybody could walk in there. The courts have. The lower courts have allowed these arrests. The Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of administrative warrants. And most judges, including this retired one speaking to you now, believe that these administrative warrants are unconstitutional and should not be complied with. But that's what ICE is doing. As a result, they sweep up all kinds of people, including American citizens, who sometimes spend a day or two in detention until each person is examined. The Fourth Amendment requires this examination before arrest.
- [10:14]
Natalie Morris
So let's talk a little bit, though, about the precedents, because Gavin Newsom is gaining a lot of popularity on X by talking tough about suing the Trump administration, saying, we're not gonna allow you to take our National Guard over to Oregon. You can't do that. But the California ruling, the courts ruled that the California deployment was legal because it was the National Guard protecting federal places and federal buildings. And that is something that I think the media sort of overlooks. They're acting like Trump has troops patrolling the streets like storm troopers. What he can is protect federal places, which is what was done in California. So if he continues to have that as his intention and say Chicago and Portland, then Democrats are just screaming dumb things.
- [11:08]
Clayton Morris
Right.
- [11:08]
Natalie Morris
So can you make that distinction?
- [11:10]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Well, in the California case, there was an actual trial. It was in San Francisco. I don't know why the trial was in San Francisco when everybody involved in the case was 400 miles to the south in Los Angeles. But the trial judge there, who was partially affirmed and partially overruled, found that the feds were chasing drunk drivers, arresting drug dealers, even chasing shoplifters.
- [11:39]
Natalie Morris
Well, the police like, well, heaven forbid, right, that that should happen.
- [11:43]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Well, the federal, federal law forbids that. The police like it because it's more cops on the street, it's more authority on the street doing their job. But federal law expressly prohibits troops from engaging in law enforcement. So after this judge barred the federal troops, the appellate court said, well, we'll bar them from engaging in law enforcement, but we can't bar them from protecting federal assets because there's another federal statute that says the President can use them for federal assets. So if the troops were used only to protect federal assets, which means a federal building and federal employees, then it's perfectly constitutional. But if they're being used for law enforcement purposes because the President believes that it will help law enforcement and will make the streets safer, he can't do that without Congress changing the law.
- [12:43]
Natalie Morris
Right, But I mean, imagine, oh, no, they were chasing drunk drivers. I realized that that's outside the purview of the law. But why is it.
- [12:50]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Here's what happened. Here's what happened.
- [12:51]
Natalie Morris
Not want that.
- [12:52]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
A lot of, a lot of the troops were not trained in ordinary law enforcement. They weren't trained in, in stopping people that weren't trained and giving the Miranda warning. They weren't trained in preservation of evidence. So a lot of people that were arrested by the troops in Los Angeles, scot free. They can't be prosecuted because the troops didn't know what rules to follow when it came to arrest. Now, you could teach someone how to do an arrest in about a week, but you can't do it in a few hours on the streets.
- [13:25]
Clayton Morris
Okay, what about this sanctuary city component of all of this? Does that come into play here?
- [13:30]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Judge Clayton, that is a facade. Well, let me explain it. If by sanctuary city is meant to the feds can't come in, then it's a facade. If by sanctuary city is meant state or city employees are not going to help the feds. Well, that is lawful. In an opinion written by Justice Scalia called Prinz versus the United States, we're now in the Clinton era where Congress enacted gun regulations and said we're going to require the states to enforce it. Justice Scalia wrote a very famous opinion saying, well, you can't do that. You can't commandeer state assets to enforce federal law. So the state cannot actively interfere, but it can refuse to cooperate. So it depends what is meant by sanctuary city. If by sanctuary city is meant feds go home, not going to work. If by sanctuary city is meant our people are not going to help you, you're going to have to enforce federal law on your own. Well, that's what the Supreme Court has authorized.
- [14:41]
Clayton Morris
Could I ask you another question? This has been sticking in my brain for a while. We saw this in Washington, D.C. judge, which is obviously a weird animal because it's a District of Columbia, but nonetheless, you had basically military tribunals. You had military lawyers coming into D.C. because, and if I'm not mistaken, military judges as well, where they had to come in because can you really trust in this liberal city, can you trust that they're gonna get fair of, you know, fair hearing here? And the Trump administration was doing this. They were bringing in these individuals into the city to basically put them through a military style hearing instead of a normal like civilian style process.
- [15:25]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
I have never heard of this. I knew that there were military lawyers there, but that was to advise the commanders on what the troops can do and what not to do. But a military tribunal would have no jurisdiction over civilians arrested by the military. It only has jurisdiction over combatants, whether lawful or unlawful, arrested by the military.
- [15:50]
Clayton Morris
And a combatant, would they be considered, would they be considered a combatant? I mean, if you have these federal forces that are being attacked by antifa and they're now labeled as a domestic terrorist organization, would that be a, an unlawful combatant?
- [16:04]
Natalie Morris
But. Well, there is no such thing as a domestic terrorist, right?
- [16:09]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
I mean, ask again please. I didn't hear you.
- [16:12]
Natalie Morris
I'm sorry, we were talking over each other. There's really no such thing as a domestic terrorist, correct?
- [16:18]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Correct. That is a phrase I won't say the President made it up because it's been around for a while. But that's a non legal phrase that the President used. The technical phrase is enemy combatant lawful and unlawful. So a lawful enemy combatant means the United States has declared war on another country or another country has declared war on the United States. And this human being is in uniform and is a soldier for the other country and gets arrested, that is a lawful enemy combatant. If he takes his uniform off and comes behind enemy lines, he comes to the United States, to the United States, that is an unlawful enemy combatant. Both of those people are entitled to trials by a military tribunal. But under no circumstances are civilians not affiliated with a foreign government entitled the military tribunals. Clayton, this is the first time I've, I've heard that there were or may have been tribunals in D.C.
- [17:24]
Clayton Morris
Yeah, we were. We covered it a few weeks ago here on the show. I mean, I guess, bottom line, Judge, is that to your point, ICE has the authority here, the federal government has the authority. These mayors signing these ice free zones, it's just political theater, correct?
- [17:41]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
It is. It is the mayors and in the case of Gavin Newsom, a governor playing to their base. But they know, or they should have lawyers that work for them who will tell them this is legally moot. This is legally meaningless.
- [17:55]
Natalie Morris
Now, something I like to follow the Straight down the Middle podcast from Jed Rubenfeld. And he has said many times that the president has the authority to do this under federal law, but if it extends beyond the scope of an emergency that he has surmised exists, then we might have some government overreach. Do you agree with that? Do you think that there is some power overreach that is concerning you right now from the Trump administration?
- [18:21]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Well, the president can only declare emergency in an area that is federal. And public safety is not federal. It is retained by the states. It's that area of governance never delegated away. That's the theory under which the federal judge in Portland ruled last Friday and then again last last Sunday. So if the president's going to declare an emergency, it would have to be people can't get in the courthouse because the demonstrations are so thick around the courthouse. Well, that would be an emergency if a federal facility were shut down. But if there's a lot of shoplifting or if there are demonstrations in the streets that are antagonistic to ice, but they're not stopping traffic, that would not be a basis for an emergency. Now, that's one side of this. The other side of this is the Supreme Court has ruled that there is no such thing as emergency jurisdiction, that the rules apply no matter how bad things are in the streets. And that ruling was based on the Civil War, when people were killing each other in the streets. That's still good law today, I guess.
- [19:42]
Clayton Morris
Final question, Judge. When you hear Hakeem Jeffries saying, we're going to fight this in the streets. Is that an incitement to violence? I mean, you're basically telling people to.
- [19:52]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Clayton, I think that's a very dangerous statement for a person in the government, particularly a person in leadership, to make. I'm sure if he were put under oath, he would say, we're going to fight it in the streets peacefully by demonstrating. And the law is, when you're talking about speech, if there is any emphasize any lawful interpretation of the speech, then the prosecution for speech fails. So that would probably be his defense. But the clip that you played doesn't have the caveat in it and I think is dangerous for him to say.
- [20:29]
Natalie Morris
I mean, they did take Trump off of social networks for that. That's an interesting choice after championing the president, being taken off. So.
- [20:39]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Okay, well, the people that run these social networks are probably a lot closer to Hakeem Jeffries than they are to Donald Trump, right?
- [20:46]
Clayton Morris
That's true. Judge, great to see you. Thank you so much for this, as always. Great to have you here. Oh, and I should point out, yeah, over 600 of these military lawyers were brought in. A number of them were then being used as Immigration judges in D.C. and other areas to expedite and go through that.
- [21:05]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
That is lawful and that is actually a smart use of their talent. And that I was aware of, perhaps that is is what we were talking about. So immigration courts do not have juries. They're not military tribunals. They are civilian lawyers. But if a military lawyer puts on civilian garb and becomes an immigration judge, in my view, that is a wise use of that person's talent, and there's absolutely no constitutional impediment to it. These are not Article 3 judges nominated by the president, confirmed by the Senate. Immigration judges are lawyers hired by the Department of Homeland Security.
- [21:51]
Clayton Morris
Great distinction. Okay, great to know. Yeah, everyone, the liberal media was slamming President Trump for overreach of authority, of course. Of course. Judge, great to see you as always. Follow the Judging Freedom podcast. Had a great interview with Jeffrey Sachs just the other day on what's going on with. I mean, I think it was you guys were specifically focused on Israel. But what do you have coming up on your show?
- [22:16]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
I have Colonel Douglas McGregor tomorrow on whether or not Iran will be able to penetrate Israel's American defenses. He doesn't think so. He also thinks the war is coming any day now. So he and I will be talking about that tomorrow, 11 o' clock in the morning, Eastern. And then, of course, post it for people to view at any time. I also have my other regulars on, but he's the superstar tomorrow. Awesome.
- [22:47]
Natalie Morris
Well, you're the superstar also. How people react to you in person and yes, star quality that keeps people subscribed.
- [22:57]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Thank you. Colonel McGregor and I just spent a weekend together in Dallas where we addressed a group of, shall I say, anti war, pro peace, libertarian Republicans in Dallas. And they loved what the colonel had to say, and I think they appreciate.
- [23:14]
Clayton Morris
Well, they're out there. They're out there. I know. I mean, we got tens of thousands of people watching our show right now.
- [23:19]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
They are fans of redacted, that's for sure.
- [23:23]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. They are sick of these wars. And the people that watch our show are in lockstep there on that. On that point and are sick of the unit party and don't like sycophants for Trump. That's for sure. Judge, great to see you. Good luck with the show and thanks so much as always. God bless. All right, coming up here on the show, we are going to talk about asthmatics are ruining the planet, apparently, and now these climate Nazis want to take away your. Your inhalers because of the carbon footprint that it's causing. We're gonna talk about that. Also, we're gonna talk about these text messages that Charlie Kirk was sending internally with TP usa and what does that mean for the pressure that he was under from the Israel lobby and Jewish donors and the massive money influence that is now about to hit the United States? You might have already started to see it on social networks. We're gonna have an investigative journalist on who really broke that 7,000 post story wide open. Nick is going to be joining us here. Nick Stout from Responsible Statecraft is going to be joining us here in a few moments.
- [24:22]
Natalie Morris
They've been doing some fantastic reporting on Israeli propaganda. It is going to be aimed at you, if it is not already. But before we do that, we want to tell you about our friends over at Shopify. Now, if you're roaming around the web and you see that little purple checkout button, then you know that the site that you're on is run on Shopify. You may not know this, but a lot of the Internet is. Yes, right there. See that purple checkout button? That's the redacted store. It is run on Shopify. So whenever we have a product that we'd like to offer our viewers, we can easily put it on Shopify. They handle everything for us from graphic design, site layout, e commerce, everything. They have everything you need to grow your business. So if you have an idea for an online retail business. Shopify is where you start. Go to shopify.com redacted and they will help you. They have really good prompts, beautiful design. You don't need to know web design, you don't need to know e commerce. They will help you from implementing your site to collecting your millions of dollars from your fantastic idea and your fantastic business. So go there and see what they have for you to get started. You can sign up for a one month trial period today. Head on over to shopify.com redacted one more time. You're gonna hear that cha ching button. That's money into your account because you are launching yourself to the world. Shopify.com redacted maximus in our chat says.
- [25:44]
Clayton Morris
This show is obviously heavily funded, but by whom?
- [25:47]
Natalie Morris
We just told you by whom? I literally just finished.
- [25:50]
Clayton Morris
We usually have like four sponsors in a show. So thank you, thank you. And our viewers who like buy one of our shirts. But no, we don't have.
- [25:57]
Natalie Morris
Well, no, it was a.
- [25:58]
Clayton Morris
Let me finish. We don't have investors. We're not funded by any governments, we're not funded by big pharma, we're not funded by any of these guys, any of these, any of these clowns. So when you see these other websites, by the way, these like conservative media that's like they've got 150 employees working there and they put out like three shows. Like you should really question like where they're getting their money from, by the way.
- [26:19]
Natalie Morris
Well, I mean it's so nice of you to ask that question while I'm reading you an ad because I'm giving you the answer. So thank you for asking that. We're funded by Shopify.
- [26:29]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. As one of our sponsors.
- [26:31]
Natalie Morris
Yeah, as one of a few of our sponsors. So thanks for asking. Please do patronize Shopify now that you ask. Way to go. Okay. If you have asthma, you should know that the climate change people want to take your inhaler because greenhouse gases. Yes, really, you should suffer because of greenhouse gases. Here's a new study from JAMA that claims that asthma inhalers are contributing to climate change. And they want doctors to push patients towards more eco friendly asthma remedies that don't work. I'm going to show you that. Why are they scapegoating asthmatics for the climate and should someone suffering from asthma give a crap about this? Well, researchers are saying that you should in fact make the more eco friendly choice if you're suffering. And they're telling doctors to talk their patients into giving up their puff inhalers. Now, if you're thinking there must be a profit motivation for this, you're right. I'm going to show it to you in a second. Now, let's set aside the fact that climate scientists do not agree that greenhouse gases are inherently bad or that climate change is caused by humans. Let's pretend for a second, for argument's sake, that we buy that. Well, these researchers, what they did was calculate the propellants in puff inhalers and conclude that they release greenhouse gases. So here they did this chart on this sort of puff type versus the dry powder or soft mist inhalers, and they said, oh, okay, well, these puff Inhalers, they emitted 24.9 metric tons of CO2 equivalents over the past 10 years. Now that sounds big, but if you divide it by 10, because this is over the span of a decade, that's only 2.5 million tons per year. Here are some other things that cause approximately 2.5 million metric tons of CO2. About 12 hours of commercial aviation, 4 hours of US traffic time. 30 minutes of global Internet usage. One day of running all Disney parks, 5 hours of global Netflix streaming. So in a short period of time, we get to the equivalent of people using inhalers. But they're worried about the inhalers and the effect over a decade, over 10 years. Which begs the question, why would someone do such a stupid research project? Why scapegoat asthmatics for climate change? Doesn't that sound dumb? Well, I have a guess why they would do it. At the end of this study, research say patients should switch to eco friendly dry powder inhalers, which are more expensive, harder to use, not suitable for children or the elderly, which are the populations that suffer the most from asthma or anyone having an asthma attack because they're powder based, you need strong lungs to inhale the powder, which is exactly what asthmatics do not have. So that's dumb. And if you it can, if you can inhale strong enough to get the powder into your lungs, you probably don't need that inhaler in the first place. They also are unreliable in humid places because the powder clumps up and their nose to cause more throat irritation. Now, one recent study of US Veterans found that those who did switch to dry inhalers were more likely to be hospitalized and go to the emergency room because the inhalers don't work. So to the doctors here who talk to these veterans into giving up their puff inhalers for the eco friendly choice for climate points they should be shamed. They should be ashamed of themselves. At a minimum, you don't gamble with someone's lungs for virtue credit. And yet here's another study that suggests that doctors start doing exactly that. This article, again, these are all recent, literally coaches doctors on how to talk patients into choosing eco friendly asthma remedies. But they skip over the part that we probably feel is obvious. Not only do these inhalers not work, they are a lot more expensive. So it's more profit based. For big pharma and insurance companies, they can cost upwards of $1,000, whereas a puff inhaler is between 50 and $300, depending on your type of insurance. So is it any wonderful they want to push you out of puff inhaler towards these dry powder ones that makes them more money even though it doesn't work. So how do you sell that to your patients? Climate guilt. So imagine you go to the doctor, you say, I'd like, you know, maybe I need an inhaler. My allergies are bad or something like that, or I'm feeling like my asthma is getting worse. And they say, well, you should really try a puff one because of climate change. You should. That should not be your consideration at all. But they are asking doctors to do this because of climate guilt. So the very idea that anyone wheezing through an asthma attack should worry about their carbon footprint is beyond parody. So if your doctor starts to tell you, like, well, maybe you want these dry powder ones, you should know now, they don't work. They're more expensive, they lead to worse outcomes. I mean, we keep inhalers around because I have a child that's probably prone to pneumonia. She does. She's never used them at home, but there's no way I'm gonna say, oh, I'm gonna just keep the powder one on hand. Because again, given that she doesn't use it on any kind of regular basis, it's gonna sit in my pantry, clump up, and then not work when I need it. They can go to hell. So let us know if you have anybody who. I had asthma as a child. This is absolute ludicrous idiocy. So let me know what you think of this, Lawrence.
- [32:24]
Clayton Morris
Volcanoes release more carbon dioxide than people. Yeah. What are you gonna do about the volcanoes?
- [32:29]
Natalie Morris
Yeah, what were you gonna say, Philip?
- [32:31]
Philip (Technical Director)
I just. Just. I'd like. I've been sitting here just kind of chuckling to myself the whole time you're doing that. That story. And I just. I want to slap somebody, but I'm not sure I don't know who I would go slap for this, but some I feel like.
- [32:41]
Clayton Morris
I know.
- [32:41]
Philip (Technical Director)
I feel like at the very least. I feel like at the very least, somebody. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not advocating violence, but I think just a good. You know, not a violent slap, just a. What are you thinking? Yeah, like, wake up, love.
- [32:52]
Clayton Morris
Maybe let's go down to the pharmacy.
- [32:55]
Natalie Morris
Don't slap the pharmacist.
- [32:56]
Clayton Morris
See who can piss you off at the pharmacy. These people are insane, though. I mean.
- [33:00]
Natalie Morris
I mean, I'm thinking. I'm looking at this like the authors of this study. I'm like, these people, like UCLA scientists, go to dinner parties and tell their fellow. You know, like, dinner eaters. Yeah. I'm working on this study about this. And other people are like, oh, that's good. Like someone. Yeah. Needs to tell them you're an idiot. That is the dumbest thing ever. Go do something good for society.
- [33:23]
Clayton Morris
No, because they live in these cloistered bubbles where it's all sycophants. It's all people. You know, it's all that, like, that liberal bubble that's going to tell them they're doing great work.
- [33:32]
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Yeah.
- [33:32]
Clayton Morris
You need to meet Janice. Janice is doing a study on how those inhalers. You ever see those inhalers that kids use? Well, that's. It's ruining the environment. It's even worse than cow farts.
- [33:41]
Natalie Morris
But this is why Clayton and I don't get invited to dinner parties. Because Clayton would be like, that's dumb as.
- [33:45]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. Someone said that to me at a dinner party.
- [33:47]
Natalie Morris
I'm gonna use that.
- [33:48]
Clayton Morris
That's dumb. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You're doing that for a living. I'm sorry. Like, I couldn't. That's why people don't invite me to dinner parties. Can't. Can't hold my. I can't bite my.
- [33:57]
Philip (Technical Director)
I think we know how. I think we know how I would react because I. I probably would have to slap them or I. I would at the very least be like, I'm gonna go. I'm gonna go over here because I don't wanna hear you talk anymore because I'm starting to get pissed off that you exist.
- [34:11]
Natalie Morris
Yeah, okay.
- [34:12]
Clayton Morris
Yeah.
- [34:12]
Natalie Morris
You know, those asthmatics really ruining it for the rest of us.
- [34:15]
Dr. Michael Sala
So.
- [34:16]
Natalie Morris
What.
- [34:16]
Dr. Michael Sala
What?
- [34:17]
Natalie Morris
Did you want to read a comment?
- [34:19]
Clayton Morris
Yeah, we had a couple of super chats. Yeah. I fund this show.
- [34:23]
Natalie Morris
Oh, thank you very much.
- [34:24]
Clayton Morris
Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Yeah.
- [34:27]
Natalie Morris
Volcanoes. We got that one. We appreciate that.
- [34:29]
Clayton Morris
Thank you so much. Really appreciate that. Hey, we've got more news to get to here on your Tuesday Taco Tuesday. We're going to talk about Israel and their funding of influencers and wanting to change ChatGPT. We've got the journalist who broke the story wide open about all those $7,000 posts. You know that influencers are being paid for their pro Israeli content. We're really excited to have Nick Stout on the show from Responsible Statecraft. He's been doing some incredible journalism. So we're going to talk about this massive money influence campaign that you might have already been seeing across social media. You're going to see see more of it though, in the days ahead. We're going to talk about that. But first, right now, is your money working for you? Well, investing in real estate has never been easier. Savings accounts and CDs offer low returns, barely keeping up with inflation. The stock market is volatile, unpredictable. One day you're up, the next day you're down. If you're tired of watching your hard earned money sit idle or ride the market roller coaster, it's time for a better solution. Now you can invest in real estate, shortening notes with as little as $500 with annualized returns up to 9%. Yes, you heard me correctly. You can go and read the prospectus. You can read all of it by just visiting our website. If you go to redacted.inc invest, we partner with our friends over at Connect Invest because for a lot of people, you know, if they want to invest in real estate, you need like a big down payment, you know, like 40, $50,000 or something like that to start actually investing or maybe building a new property that you want to rent out or something like that. It's just too onerous for people. And that's where Connect Invest comes in because you can start investing in real estate short notes for as little as $500. And if you open your account today and fund that account, you'll get a $50 bonus right inside your account. I mean, so, so many of my family invest this way and it's a really, really powerful way to start investing in real estate. But if you don't have like a large amount of money to start buying single family homes or investing in commercial properties or, or any of that stuff, it's just, it's very, very difficult to do. So that's why we're big fans of Connect Invest. So visit them today. Go to redacted.inc./invest for as little as $500. You can start investing and sign up today for a $50 bonus. We've been working with them for years, so thanks to Connect Invest. All right, well, we know, we now know the Charlie Kirk text messages are real. Candace Owens dropped those texts yesterday and the Internet exploded. Showing Charlie Kirk in a group text chat saying that he lost another $2 million donation from Jewish backed group. Here, I'll just read it. Just lost another huge Jewish donor, two million bucks a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm thinking of inviting Candace and someone in the chat says, ugh. Charlie then says, Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause he says so. Reports were of course coming out that he was pressured. He was under enormous pressure. The sort of pro Zionist crowd of course came out, said, that's a conspiracy theory. Didn't you see Benjamin Netanyahu just jump on television and tell all of us that Charlie loved Israel? They literally put up billboards across Tel Aviv, by the way, saying how much that they love Charlie Kirk. I was wondering who's funding that, by the way. It's really interesting. They even built sandcastles on the beaches in Israel. They were like Charlie Kirk sandcastles being built because they just wanted to show how much that Netanyahu and Charlie were friendly, I guess. But apparently Israel and Jewish donors were pressuring Charlie Kirk. They wanted to say that he loved Israel. Netanyahu went on a big PR campaign after Charlie Kirk was shot. Turns out I know for a fact that Charlie Kirk despised Benjamin Netanyahu. That's confirmed. And he was getting enormous pressure from Israeli donors. Well, we now know that those text messages are 100% real because Andrew Colvitt from Turning Points who is in this group chat just said, yes, they are real. Watch. Started this show to address some of the things that have been going around on public, namely about a text, a group text chain that has been made known and released by Candace Owens. And I just want to address it head on because, you know, that was a text grab, a screen grab that I had shared with people. So it, it is authentic. And I want to go into it because I actually am really excited that the. The truth is out there at first. Yeah. Wow. So they're real. All the people that were like, these are faked. Okay, well, confirmation.
- [38:59]
Natalie Morris
Well, now the narrative is it doesn't matter and she'll prove that she was right. And that makes her crazy because she was right. Okay.
- [39:08]
Clayton Morris
So anyway, those Texts were just days before Charlie was killed. And before his death, Charlie warned on his show about the Jewish donor influence in America. Watch. And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical, open border, neoliberal, quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews, and now it's coming for Jews. And they're like, what on earth happened?
- [39:44]
Philip (Technical Director)
And it's not just the colleges.
- [39:45]
Clayton Morris
It's the nonprofits. It's the movies, it's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like, time for you guys to wake up and say, no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.
- [39:55]
Natalie Morris
Hmm.
- [39:56]
Clayton Morris
Well, last week, journalist Nick Stout discovered that influencers being paid $7,000 for every positive pro Israel post they make here. Was that reporting? Israel is paying influencers $7,000 per post. And while this week we learned that Israel plans to spend 4.1 million on marketing to save its reputation in the United States, according to the Jewish Telegraph Agency, most of the marketing will be aimed at American Christians. Well, we want to bring in Nick Stout now and to talk about this. He's the one who broke that $7,000 per post story. He joins us now from Responsible Statecraft. Nick, great to see you. Incredible reporting on all of this. And I know you just launched another story today that you just broke that says Israel wants to hire Chris Pratt and Steph Curry to target Christian evangelical churches for support. Can you tell us a little bit about that? And then we'll kind of backtrack a little bit and go into some of your other reporting here.
- [40:55]
Nick Stout
Yeah, absolutely. I mean, first of all, thanks so much for inviting me on Clayton and Natalie, great to be here with you. And, yeah, so this was actually part of that same contract for Christian outreach. All of those celebrities are Christian celebrities who have been outspoken and were identified by a firm that was pitching a contract to the Israeli government as potential spokespeople to Deliver Pro. And this is a direct quote to Deliver Pro Israel messaging. And, you know, the celebrities themselves have not been reached out to. I reached out to all of them just out of curiosity, and a couple got back to me. Jon Voight's PR person said that. That she wasn't sure if he would consider a contract like this, but that it was certainly. She seemed to indicate that it was certainly on the table. But, yeah, these celebrities are part of this massive PR blitz that Israel is undertaking. And this is just the latest iteration of it. This is the same contract, by the way. I know you guys covered this, I believe in yesterday's show. It's part of the same contract that this firm, Show Faith By Works, is undertaking to geofence Christian churches all across the Western United States. And they're also, even they have, it's a massive contract with a bunch of different line items. But another one that I find kind of interesting is they're buying a bunch of mobile trailers and they're going to be taking these mobile trailers across the Western US and they're calling it the October 7th experience. They're going to be highlighting the atrocities of October 7th, but also as part of this, they're going to be featuring footage of IDF soldiers talking about their experience. And so all of this is part of this Christian outreach.
- [42:54]
Natalie Morris
And how do you think Christians will receive this? Anyone who understands, I mean, it's clearly that there's a desperate attempt to regain Christian support for anyone over 30. They still have a stronghold, according to the recent New York Times poll, that there's still a stronghold in Trump supporters, specifically older ones. But this younger generation, it's almost like the Streisand effect. Like it's, they're trying to make it not be transparent. And it's, it's painfully transparent. So I think that Christians, it seems very offensive to target Christians in this way. But do you think they will see it that way?
- [43:38]
Nick Stout
I think in particular, younger Christians will likely see it very differently. Right. I mean, I was curious because in the contract, part of the justification that this firm show faith by works that they mentioned for the need for Israel to undertake this contract was to combat low approval rates of Israel among evangelical Christians. And I saw that and I was a little bit confused at first because I was like, hold on a second. You know, evangelical Christians are, have been one of the most steadfast supporters of Israel historically, and they continue to be so. But then I looked a little bit further and I noticed that there's actually a decent amount of polling that has suggested that younger evangelical Christians have departed in support for this ironclad US Israel relationship and have started to question that relationship further. So I think that it's particularly targeting that generation, you know, Gen Z, Gen Alpha, you know, younger people that, you know, will maybe they're forced to go to church by their parents. And the second they get in there though, their, their phones and you know, their mobile, mobile devices are geo fenced and they get tracked and targeted with these pro Israel ads. So I Think that, you know, it's particularly targeting young Christians and young evangelical Christians at that.
- [45:09]
Clayton Morris
Can you talk about something?
- [45:11]
Natalie Morris
I'm sorry, I didn't. I don't think I understood that. So once you go to church, you've been. Your phone is tagged as someone that they need to. Goodness.
- [45:20]
Clayton Morris
Well, that's what I was just about to ask.
- [45:22]
Nick Stout
And they spell it out very explicitly.
- [45:24]
Clayton Morris
Can you talk about the mechanics of that specifically, Nick? Like, so how do Christians know, like, is their church one of these targeted Israeli churches? Like, this is crazy to me. Like, on Sunday you're gonna go to church and I don't know what church you're going to, and you suddenly find out you're starting to get like, pro Israel ads because your church specifically has partnered with this and they're receiving funding from the Israeli government. Like, can you talk about the mechanics of where that money is coming? Did the church sign off on it and they're making their parishioners now, like, digitally tracked by Israel?
- [45:57]
Nick Stout
Yeah, those are great questions. So it's not immediately clear to me that the churches themselves would be aware of this. It would take a ridiculous amount of outreach to, you know, if people are curious, you know, if their church. Just to answer that first question, people are curious if their church is part of this. You'll have to dig through a boring document, but there is a long list of churches. It names every single church that is in theory, targeted by this. And you know what they say is that major churches.
- [46:33]
Clayton Morris
This is.
- [46:33]
Nick Stout
I'm going to read from the document because I think this shows you how this works. Major churches in California, Arizona, Nevada and Colorado and all Christian colleges during worship times will be geofenced. The actual physical boundaries of those churches will be geofenced. And then it says that they will be tracked. The attendees of the church will be tracked and continue to be targeted with ads. So that's how it works. And it's the same way, you know, if you, you know, if you have your location services on that data just gets. Gets sold and you don't know necessarily where it goes. Right. It's the same way. It's the same reason why if you're within, say, a mile radius of a, a AT&T store, you might get an AT&T AD. It's the same mechanics that work for corporate marketing in that way.
- [47:23]
Natalie Morris
I mean, imagine they took away TikTok for the express reason that the Chinese government should not be able to track.
- [47:30]
Clayton Morris
You, which was a lie.
- [47:32]
Natalie Morris
But we know for a fact now that an Israeli push is to track Americans, American Christians and our government is fine with that. In your reporting, don't you say it's non denominatal, non denominational Christians mostly?
- [47:53]
Nick Stout
Yeah, it's, it's. They mentioned they single out evangelicals, but really it's, it's again, if people are curious, like, I mean, if you don't, I mean, first thing you can do is disable your location services. If you don't want to be tracked, that will hopefully ensure or at least mitigate the risk of you being tracked. But if you want to be extra sure and you know, let your community know, you can go to this list of churches and you know, I'll try and send this document to you guys so you can make sure to get the word out there. But you know, there's a long list of churches. It even details the size of the congregations, the states, and we'll put a.
- [48:33]
Clayton Morris
Link in our section.
- [48:34]
Natalie Morris
How do they know this?
- [48:35]
Clayton Morris
If you said what's crazy to me though, Nick, I guess what I'm just confused by. I think you said if I understood you correctly, these churches might not even be aware.
- [48:44]
Nick Stout
So I would be, I would be very surprised. I would be very surprised doing it.
- [48:48]
Clayton Morris
On their behalf then like, you know.
- [48:50]
Natalie Morris
I mean, like if, like you don't need to. Right, right.
- [48:53]
Clayton Morris
But. Well, you think, right. I mean, but like if I, I don't know, like, hey, we have a redacted guest. They come into our redacted studio and I have nothing to do with it. But suddenly then they're receiving like pro CNN ads. Like we're trying to sway you to stop watching redacted. We want you to watch cnn. Like, wait, I have no say in that. Like you're just running ads based on my geolocation because someone came into the redacted studio. Like, what?
- [49:16]
Nick Stout
Yeah, I mean I, I hope to do some follow up on reporting and I'd be very curious if communities in these, these places are aware of it. But yeah, in essence that is, that is how it works. I mean they're working, they say that they're working with, you know, different pastors and it seems like they have quite a few allies at a lot of these churches. But you know, the list itself is, is it goes on and on and on and I'd be very surprised if the pastors at each of these church churches would be aware of this. I mean it would be such an undertaking if that were the case.
- [49:50]
Clayton Morris
Philip, our, our technical director has a question for you. Go ahead, Philip.
- [49:55]
Philip (Technical Director)
Yeah, yeah, so I'm listening to this and I'm just wondering like, if they're targeting the youth, the people that, that are most likely to see through what's going on on and like, or the people that are, that are not likely to see what's going on are going to be older generation Christians who are already pro Israel. So like, I guess at the end of the day, like, what is the point? Like, I don't understand how they're trying to influence younger people who are going to see, who are more likely to see through that it's influence and it's going to be less likely to succeed.
- [50:26]
Nick Stout
I mean, I think it's a great question. I think part of that, I mean, you know, the goal, I think is partly to win over the swath of the population that they've lost. I mean, there was a poll, Gallup poll from July that found that only 9% of Americans were supportive of Israel's military action in Gaza, aged 18 34. So they're trying to win over that population, but they're also trying to maintain, I think, the levels of support that they have from the evangelical community. But I think you're right to doubt the advocacy of something like this because, you know, they're kind of like throwing everything at the wall. I mean, you know, they've, in the last month, and maybe in some combination of a lot of these tactics they will be, they will find some success. But, but a lot of it strikes me as kind of desperate in a way. I mean, in the last month, Israel has hired six different firms to work for them under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. And this is just one of them. I mean, you know, they're also paying influencers, they're also trying to create websites and digital content to train chatbots. They're trying to integrate pro Israel messaging into a number of media networks. And so, you know, it's just one of many things that Israel is trying to do. Israel last week increased its public diplomacy budget by $40 million through the end of this fiscal year, which was an increase on top of the 100 and I believe it was 150 million that they had already appropriated. And so it's clear that this is something that they feel threatened by. They feel threatened by the fact that a lot of people are questioning this historical relationship and, and are beginning to see things differently. And it remains to be seen whether it'll work or not. I have my doubts over some of it, but a lot of it is, it's a combination of these kind of old guerrilla Internet warfare tactics and New ones. I think the one that jumps to mind is the fact that they're training ChatGPT. I mean, that strikes me as something new, something that we, it's a new way of trying to manipulate the flow of information that we don't even really have a way of measuring the success of yet. But because people are increasingly using generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT, like a search engine like Google or Bing, I don't know if anyone still uses Bing, but they clearly want to reach those audiences, people that use it in that way, that ask questions like, is Israel committing war crimes? You know, if next time you go to chatgpt it might tell you a different answer because they have a firm working on getting pro Israel messaging into OpenAI.
- [53:22]
Clayton Morris
That's crazy.
- [53:23]
Natalie Morris
I just want to make this comment and I don't know if you have a response to it, but as you're talking about this effort to track churchgoers and Christian goers, it occurs to me that it's a really good time to do that because one of the responses to the death of Charlie Kirk was people going to church. People have overwhelmingly decided that they need to commit to some kind of spiritual journey and a lot of them have followed his lead into Christianity. So it strikes me as convenient to track Christians at a time when they are super motivated. What do you think? And I know that that's not in your documents, so I'm just asking you to respond to that before we let you go. This is, it's been a fantastic interview and I really appreciate your perspective.
- [54:10]
Nick Stout
Yeah, I mean, it's an effort to meet people where they are. I mean, I find it a little bit cynical the fact that a lot of people are looking for answers. A lot of people, you know, are showing up on Sunday because they, you know, for a number of reasons. People go to church for so many different reasons that are very personal to them. Right. And, and the fact that you would be targeted in this way by a foreign government, a foreign government that is very destabilizing actor in a lot of ways. That the UN has come down and said that a UN commission has said that it's committing genocide, all these things. The fact that you would be targeted by a foreign government in that way while you're trying to get worship is I find deeply concerning. And you know, like the, the, the, this firm even like they give it down, they get it down to the number, you know, they talk about how many churches there, how many, how many church goer attendees they, they estimate, you know, for Instance, they give an estimate of something in the realm of 5 to 10% of churchgoers will engage in their activities in, in some way. You know, how do they come up with that number? I have no idea. But it's, it's, it's concerning to me that they're, that people are just trying to worship and then they're, they're getting targeted in this way on their, their mobile devices and all of these different ways.
- [55:36]
Natalie Morris
Gosh. I mean, we have a separation of church and state because our government doesn't care that Israel would do this. We don't have a separation between church and foreign state. That's wild.
- [55:46]
Clayton Morris
Where's the outrage in members of Congress? I mean, you know our interview yesterday, General Mike Flynn, like, he was posting about it. Because this is shocking. I think most Americans don't know it. So we need more journalists like you doing this incredible research. Nick, thank you for your incredible research. People should go to Responsible Statecraft.
- [56:05]
Natalie Morris
Yeah. You guys are killing it.
- [56:07]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. Doing incredible work. Nick, Great to have you here. And as this story progresses, please come back. I'd like to investigate some of our local churches here in Colorado and see if they're even aware of this at all and if their parishioners even know that this is being targeted.
- [56:20]
Natalie Morris
Yeah. Put up a placard when you walk into church.
- [56:24]
Clayton Morris
You're being tracked by Israel just by going to church. Yeah. Nick, great to see you. Thank you so much.
- [56:30]
Nick Stout
Yeah, thank you so much.
- [56:31]
Clayton Morris
Exactly. Scan your QR code and get your free trip to Israel and get $7,000 a post. Like, this is. It's crazy times we live in. Anyway, Nick, thanks for hanging out so long. We appreciate it. Great reporting. Visit him over at Responsible Statecraft. We appreciate it. Thanks, Nick.
- [56:47]
Nick Stout
Thank you. Take care.
- [56:49]
Clayton Morris
Our pleasure. All right.
- [56:51]
Natalie Morris
That was a. Wow.
- [56:52]
Clayton Morris
Insane.
- [56:52]
Natalie Morris
That was a jaw dropper. I thought I was prepared for that segment and I was not.
- [56:58]
Philip (Technical Director)
Oh, I'm just, I'm just reminded of like the, the story where like Jesus is like, like up upending all of the marketing stuff around the temple. Like that, that kind of famous, you know?
- [57:06]
Natalie Morris
Yes.
- [57:06]
Philip (Technical Director)
I'm like, how would he, how would he deal with this? Like, but people are going to my church and getting advertising. Like, what?
- [57:12]
Natalie Morris
Getting tracked. Yeah, I'm sure he'd love it. That's totally in the spirit.
- [57:16]
Clayton Morris
And now you need to support Israel more like the Israeli tracking of American Christians government.
- [57:20]
Natalie Morris
Like, oh, my God, when he said give Caesar's things to Caesar, he meant your data, right?
- [57:27]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. Give your data. All right, coming up on the show, we're going to talk about Three Eye Atlas. It just passed by Mars and NASA won't release the photos. What are they hiding? What are the satellites and the reconnaissance rovers that are there that actually captured this stuff? They have the HD images. We know that they do because amateur astronomers were able to actually extrapolate the low res images. What is this thing? What are they hiding? We're going to talk about that when we come back. But first let's be clear. Cryptocurrency. I don't know if you saw Bitcoin. New all time highs. It's no longer just emerging. Um. Oh yeah, I'm sorry.
- [58:02]
Natalie Morris
Oh yeah, I was wondering. Okay. Actually we'll tell you about crypto.com later. What we do want to tell you about is our friends over@120life.com because if you have high blood pressure, well you might know that's the number one risk factor for mortality. And in fact one in two adults has it. So that means that if you are one of them, you might be a ticking time bomb. But here's the good news. You have the power to take control naturally with 120 life. It's a great, great blend of great tasting super fruit juices and actually can help lower your blood pressure naturally. It's formulated with ingredients that have been shown to support healthy blood pressure levels, trusted by over thousands of health professionals and used by people just like you who have seen real measurable results. So you can try it risk free for a two week trial. Go to 120Life. Just type out the numbers one two zero and then spell out life120l I f e.com use the code redacted. Actually go to one two zero life.com redacted and then the code is redacted and you will get 15 off. And you can track your progress with a simple blood pressure monitor and watch your numbers drop and feel the difference. Risk free. If you don't see lower numbers in two weeks, you get your money back. So you have nothing to lose except high blood pressure. So go to 120Life. That's 1120Life.com redacted. Use the code redacted to save 15% off. This is serious. This is your life we're talking about. 120 life can help. Don't wait. Take control of your health today.
- [59:33]
Clayton Morris
Well, why is NASA and the US government hiding the first HD images of the 3I Atlas this interstellar object from all of us? This mysterious object just flew right by Mars. On October 3rd and 4th. And NASA has some of the most advanced satellite images and satellites orbiting Mars and reconnaissance instruments that are, that are actually tracking this object. Astronomers were able to process data from the Mars Perseverance rover that gave low resident. Excuse me, that gave low resolution images of Three Eye Atlas on October 3rd and 4th. But high resolution images from the orbiters have still not been released by NASA. Why? What are they hiding? Dr. Michael Sala, who writes over at exopolitics.org has been tracking this story. He's been tracking 3i Atlas now for months and joins me now to talk about it. Doc, great to see you. Welcome back to the show.
- [60:33]
Dr. Michael Sala
Thanks. I'm glad to talk about this really perplexing issue.
- [60:37]
Clayton Morris
It is perplexing because let's just put up here on the screen, this is video of the Mars cameras here. You know, this is just a rendering here, but there's plenty of these high resolution satellites taking photos that are orbiting Mars, that are right there on Mars, not to mention the Mars Perseverance rover that's on the planet. Why has not, why have NASA not released these images?
- [61:00]
Dr. Michael Sala
Well, it's part of a pattern that NASA has been doing for decades now, going to all of its Mars orbiters and the International Space Station. What would happen typically is that many of these cameras were often oriented and would provide a live feed and then anomalies would be seen on Mars or in space around the International Space Station. And so NASA decided that what it would do is that it would kind of like pretty much prevent or stop the live feeds and would go to a kind of delayed release of images where their photo image experts would process the images. But what we know from whistleblowers, and here we go back to 2001 with Donna Hare and Carl Wolf, who were two whistleblowers that appeared in the disclosure project press conference, is that what NASA would do is that it would scrub images that contained any evidence of extraterrestrial life. So this is what was really happening with these delays. So NASA would go from live feeds or would cut a live feed and then it would delay the release of images. And that would give time for its photo image experts to remove, move anything in there that was suggestive of extraterrestrial life. And I think what we're having now with the Mars orbiters, with 3i Atlas passing its perihelion with Mars, it's about 30 million kilometers away from Mars. So that's the closest point it gets to Mars. Some of the Mars orbiters, two, two of them are NASA orbiters, two are European Space Agency, another one is Chinese, and another one is the United Arab Emirates. So they, they could take images of the Three Eye Atlas. But so far, as you already said, what was released on October 3rd was this very low resolution image from the NAVCAM of the Mars Perseverance rover, which is really just a camera oriented for the Mars rover to be able to navigate the Mars surface. So it would, you would see the kind of horizon and you would see stars or objects in the background. So that's what the, that fuzzy image from the Mars Perseverance rover showed. And so that was the first, that was a live feed and that was processed by amateur astronomers. So I mean, it does show that amateur astronomers can process and release live feeds from NASA. But when it comes to the Mars orbiters, these, there is no live feed of what is happening in deep space. I mean, we really have to rely on NASA and the European Space Agency to point their cameras towards any object and then release it. But just today the European Space Agency did release something.
- [64:24]
Clayton Morris
What do you think? I mean, people, you know, obviously speculating about this thing for quite a while now it has been doing some very uncharacteristic things of a normal comet. So why are people so fascinated by this object particularly? And do you think that it's anything nefarious, anything unexplainable or just simply an interstellar object that's behaving differently than perhaps a normal, you know, a normal object would. Maybe there's some sort of a pattern with it, I don't know. But what do you make of this? Someone in the chat, Eddie Schwab in our chat, says this thing looks like the Doomsday Machine from Star Trek. Yes, from the 1960s episode called the Doomsday Machine. It looks exactly like that, kind of like this long cylindrical looking object.
- [65:08]
Dr. Michael Sala
Well, well, from the get go, when it was discovered back in July of this year by the ATLAS telescope system, what, what it showed was that this was on a path that was like within five degrees of the ecliptic, which is very unusual, and that it would pass close by several major planets. And some astronomers did statistical studies and found that this was very highly unusual and suggestive of, of some kind of intelligent navigation that was behind this to, to kind of follow that passage. The lack of a tail is really the, the most kind of like startling aspect of Three Eye Atlas that this is no comet. And this is something that you can see in the very latest, the most recent image that just came out today from the European Space Agency that shows. And I think I sent you a gif file of 3i atlas from the ExoMars European Space Agency orbiter. That shows a kind of dot. But what's interesting is that there's no tail. And that's very important because if this was a comet, right now, as 3i Atlas is approaching the sun, you would see a tail behind it as it's approaching the sun, but there's no tail. So that's suggestive of something other than a comet that has traveled from some interstellar region to here. And so this is where we get into the. A lot of speculation. I mean, many different sources are saying that this is an extraterrestrial spacecraft that is here to really kind of like, raise the frequencies of the planet or of the solar system. And some say it's associated with white hats that want to kind of like, break the disclosure, secrecy. So, you know, there's a lot of speculation about it, but. But still, the fact is that right now it's very close to Mars, relatively speaking, in astronomical terms, and that the images that are being released, I mean, NASA hasn't released anything yet due to the government shutdown. And that's another factor that people are pointing to that this is more than coincidental, that just as three Eye Atlas approaches, Mars gets to its perihelion, NASA goes into shutdown mode. Is that accident? Is that coincidental? And people are also speculating about the. The generals being summoned to the Pentagon. I mean, were they really there just to be lectured to in terms of how the woke agenda is no longer suitable in the Pentagon or the Department of War? Or were they being secretly given operational briefings talking about a planetary crisis? If it becomes clear that 3i Atlas is a spacecraft and is carrying extraterrestrials who are associated not just with Mars in its ancient past, but also with Earth in terms of underwater colonies. And that's something that would be of great concern to Pentagon generals.
- [68:55]
Clayton Morris
It's just so strange because I've read reports about the way that it's, you know, the elliptic tracking, the way that it's come in just be nearly impossible. I mean, basically like fractions of a percentage point likelihood that this would ever happen to be going on this particular path, as you point out. And I mean, I guess the universe is vast enough that there's a chance, right? There's absolutely a chance. I mean, you know, people do win the lottery after all. You know, there is a chance, right? So I guess in that situation, it could be. But also the other Question is about NASA not releasing these photos is that, well, there's a government shutdown, so maybe all these guys are just off. You know, they're not making any money right now. They're just non essential employees of the government. So they're just not interested in releasing any of these photos to us right now because they're at home. What do you make of that?
- [69:49]
Dr. Michael Sala
Well, that's the explanation that we're getting from NASA, that it's really just a matter of the government shutdown and that people that would be normally working on these images and then releasing them to the general public essentially kind of like unemployed at the moment, or at least on furlough or something like that. But if you look at the entire History of 3i Atlas and the cursory way in which NASA has used its equipment to study 3 Eye Atlas, you'll notice that there's been a pattern of really ignoring it. I mean, all you have is there's one image from the Hubble Telescope, there's one image from the James Webb Space Telescope. We know, we know that the Juno mission, which is a, a NASA mission which has been operating near Jupiter for well over a decade, which could have been used to photograph Three Eye Atlas as it approaches Jupiter in December. That, that has been deactivated just before three Eye Atlas arrives in the vicinity of Jupiter. And so you have to kind of like ask yourself, well, is that coincidental? I mean, you have a government shutdown three days before the three Atlas achieves perihelion with Mars. And then you have the Juno spacecraft, its cameras being turned off a week, literally a week before Three Eye Atlas starts to appear in an area of the sky close to Jupiter. So you look at all of this and I think the conclusion is that NASA is not really releasing its best images or even making an effort to release its best imagery of Three Eye Atlas to the general public. That whatever imagery is being gained, the best imagery is definitely happening in classified programs. But NASA is doing very little to educate the public about Three Eye Atlas. So it's left to amateur astronomers and observers to really speculate as to what's really going on.
- [72:09]
Clayton Morris
You recall we talked about this, I think months ago here on the show. Jeremy Corbell back in January is on camera talking about how they will, they will push this idea of like a fake alien invasion on us and they will talk about some large interstellar object that's coming towards us. That's the story that they're going to use to try to scare us. So turning off These cameras, NASA not releasing photos. Do you think it's all part of this game or do you think it's a separate story that Jeremy might have been talking about?
- [72:40]
Dr. Michael Sala
No, I think it is part of that preparation. I mean, it's really trying to get the public interested in Three Eye Atlas, but giving it very little information that could educate people about what's really going on. And then you have NASA astronomers, prominent astronomers, such as Dr. Avi Loeb from Harvard. They're proposing this dark forest theory, which is the idea that interstellar space is very dangerous and that any alien civilization that would send probes here would do so on the assumption that it's entering a hostile environment. And so it would be prepared to act in a hostile way to defend itself or deal with that environment. And so I think we do get to this kind of possibility that people have been talking about for decades now, which is the false flag alien invasion, that an object like Three Eye Atlas could be kind of the precursor or could be made the fulcrum of some kind of attempt to fool the public that, you know, we are under some kind of invasion. And certainly, you know, there's, I totally believe that there are positive extraterrestrials out there that are monitoring us and want to interact with us, but I think that there are those within the government apparatus, the deep state ruling bloodline families, whatever you want to call them, that, that want to prevent that. And their way of doing that is to use their mainstream media assets and assets within the legislative bodies of major governments to make the public believe that we would be invaded rather than friendly extraterrestrials making contact.
- [74:37]
Clayton Morris
Well, someone, someone just gave a compliment, said, hey, this is kind of like redacted in the afternoons. Can cover sort of the coast to coast AM stuff. They don't have to wake up at 3 in the morning. I'm, I'm proud of that. I'm proud of that because I grew up, you know, loving coast to coast and I, you know, I love these stories and I love, I want to get to the bottom of this just like Dr. Michael Sala does. You have to read Dr. Sala's great works, read his incredible books, visit his work over@exopolitics.org love having Dr. Sala on, who spent many decades as a professor and started to really try to seek the answers here. So really appreciate it. Doc, great to have you here on the show as always.
- [75:13]
Dr. Michael Sala
Thank you.
- [75:15]
Clayton Morris
Appreciate that. And hey, thanks for the coast to coast compliments. I appreciate that. I love coast to Coast. So thank you guys so much for that. All right, I'll take some super chats here in a second and we'll get you guys out of here on this, on this Tuesday. But first, let's be clear about something. Cryptocurrency is no longer just emerging. It's here. And this is this latest move, obviously you're seeing with Bitcoin. $125,000. It's massive. It really cements that reality in a big way. Trump Media just inked a massive $6.4 billion deal with Yorkville Acquisition Corp. In crypto.com and the crypto platform trusted by millions of users worldwide. They're teaming up to scoop up 6.4 billion in CRO tokens, the powerhouse token that fuels fast, low fee, defi and staking rewards the real world perks, just like cash back on your spends to establish America's first CRO treasury. That's right. You can learn more about that today. What's if you want in on this action, you want to learn about this entire CRO strategy, head over to crypto.com today and let's make crypto great again. I know it got slammed there for a while, but man, when you look at how we're going to be able to move things around on this blockchain and be able to transact in ways that we've never been able to before, you got to be on the cutting edge. Crypto.com is there. For more information on the proposed business combinations, check out Yorkville Aqua Acquisition Corp's public filings and check out crypto.com. let's make crypto great again. All right, any super chats we want to get to here? Thank you guys for your. Oh, thank you, Siraj. Am I saying that right? Sent 20 gifted 20 redacted gift memberships. Thank you so much. And another 20. You're so kind and welcome to the Rebellion. By the way, if you do join us or subscribe, your name will pop right up here on the screen. So Laura K. Just became a redacted rebel. So thank you guys for subscribing to the program. It's free to subscribe if you're here. We are here live Monday through Thursday. And so, yes, please watch us live at 4pm Eastern Time Monday through Thursday. Next week the kids have off for their fall break, so we're going to take a few days with the kids and have a few days off. So we won't have our normal live show, but we do have some pretty big interviews that we're going to Be releasing one that I just did about an hour before showtime today, which it was one of those interviews where like I had to scrape my jaw off the floor. Like it was. It was that stunning about Palantir. I'll tell you about that. But anyway, we're going to release that interview as soon as. First of all, as soon as we get it all chopped up and edited for you. And that should be out next week as well. But we will be off the live show during that time, so I hope you'll hang out here. Yeah. Let me see. Any other super chats we want to get to that I missed to read a few of them here. Anything you guys want to say, David? Philip.
- [78:19]
Philip (Technical Director)
I'm just. I'm surprised that the, like with the. With the shutdown, like, because I. I know some like, you know, astrophysicists. I have some like friends that are in physics and. And like whatever NASA or whatever they're up to, like the scientists themselves. You'd have to hold me at gunpoint if they were like a government shutdown. You've got this once in a lifetime chance to high res image of a. Of an interstellar object flying by, but we're shut down. You'd have to hold me at gunpoint to keep me away from that equipment. I'd be like, screw you, you're gonna have to shoot me. I'm looking at that picture, so it just Exactly. I don't know.
- [78:51]
Clayton Morris
I'm gonna. I'm gonna take. Oh, you mean I'm. I'm. I'm. Government shutdown. No, I'm releasing these photos. I'm releasing these high definition images right now.
- [79:00]
Philip (Technical Director)
Yeah, because I mean that's. Those are some nerdy people and I appreciate. They're my people. And that's like, you wouldn't be able to keep me out of that room.
- [79:10]
Clayton Morris
Irving. Irving Sanguinetti. Thank you for your $20. Super chat says awesome content. Thank you so much. That's so kind of you, Philip.
- [79:18]
Jamie
It sounds like you and your friend should have been guarding the Epstein cell.
- [79:24]
Philip (Technical Director)
We don't make very good guards.
- [79:27]
Clayton Morris
By the way, did you see Cash Patel's tweet today? I tweeted it earlier this morning, but he posted. We're proud to be. Be the most transparent agency. And whatever he said, releasing information, he said this transparency, I promise is being delivered by this FBI. But he got community noted big time. And the Trump campaign promised to release the full Epstein files, which it still has not done. So like, anytime he posts something, it's like, that's Great. But where are the Epstein files, which are just.
- [79:55]
Philip (Technical Director)
Did there just happen to be. Did there just happen to be some bullets lying there with the words written? There are no Epstein files on them. Just happened to be there. We found these. It's proof.
- [80:05]
Jamie
What is that? What was the movie where somebody would yell something every time somebody did, and some guy's like, I hate that guy. Was that Happy Gilmore? No.
- [80:15]
Philip (Technical Director)
You're talking about. No, you're men in tights. Are you talking about that? Hey. Yeah. I hate that guy. I hate that guy.
- [80:22]
Clayton Morris
Oh, yeah. Vincent, I'm sorry. I missed this one early because we were doing the show. I didn't see this one come in. Vincent, thank you for your $10 super chat and $20 super chat. So kind of you said something interesting. Brian Harpole From Turning Points USA security detail after 2022 was interviewed in a show called Return to authenticity, episode 14, but it's now been deleted. I did find a promotion of the episode 14. He's a gun tactics expert. Genius. His company called Consolidated Training Group is online right now. Eric Sardinia, the host of the show, has the promo of the missing episode, which he thinks has the link to Brian's page. Guns, tactics, swats, medic, evac plans. This explains the TPUSA team. Thank you for that. That's fascinating. Thank you for that. I had not seen that Supreme Stu. Steve says Primate Mist. It works. Look it up. Thank. We were talking about the asthmatic stuff earlier, I guess. Clay Royer, $10 Super Chess has all fun to this show. And I love retro video game content as well. Thanks, Clay. Appreciate that. And we got Lawrence's Victor says, when are you guys going to get Nick Fuentes on the show? I'd like to do a deep dive with him. You know, I don't want to like, retread all the stuff that he. You know, it's like how many times you want to have someone repeat the same thing they just said on Patrick Bet David show or just was on Candace's show, like. But I think there's a lot of new stuff that I could talk with him about. I'd love to have him on the show. I'm not afraid to talk to anybody, by the way.
- [82:02]
Jamie
Well, and never assume that your whole audience watches another channel that's seen it. You know, Sean Cannell on YouTube says he'll make the same video like four times because it's a new audience every time.
- [82:15]
Clayton Morris
That's true. That's true. I mean, we've definitely had on certain guests and then a year later, we've had them on again because we've, you know, we've. We want to further the story, but people are like, oh, so awesome that you had this guy on. I'm like, yeah, but we had. Do you know that we had him on a year ago? No, because people have lives. They don't care. Like, they're doing. They've got kids to take care of.
- [82:34]
Jamie
They're not like, I. I've seen comments. People said, you need to have this person before. I'm like, we just had them on, like, two days ago.
- [82:42]
Clayton Morris
I know. No, people. Sometimes I get comments that are like, hey, when are you. Are you ever gonna have this person on? I'm like, he was on three days ago on our show.
- [82:50]
Jamie
Yeah.
- [82:50]
Clayton Morris
Or are you guys ever gonna cover this story? And I've had, like. I've covered it 12 times, and we have an entire playlist on our channel.
- [82:56]
Philip (Technical Director)
We've had that. We've had that happen. When we did that, that was the first story we did in the show. And we're like, at the third story, and they're like, how come you never talk about this? Like, we.
- [83:05]
Clayton Morris
All right.
- [83:05]
Philip (Technical Director)
We literally just did. Yes.
- [83:08]
Clayton Morris
Rewind the show to the beginning of today's episode and you'll know. Literally. See, we spent 20 minutes talking about it. But it's so funny. Eddie Schwab says yes. We want to hear from the Griper. The Griper King. Hazel the Sausage Dog. That's a. That's an incredible screen name. Thanks. Hazel the Sausage Dog says you're missing a trick by not getting David Ike on. Should be a redacted mission. Do you know what, Hazel? I'll be totally honest with you. I felt pretty ignorant. I only knew, like, had a cursory understanding of David Icke's positions on things. I know he's obviously anti globalist, anti Empire, anti tracking us, all of those things. I had a cursory understanding, but I've just started reading all of his books. So what I want to do is I want to try to read as many of his books as I can before I have an interview with him. And frankly, I'd like to actually go and try to interview him in England if I could, like, actually sit down and do a full interview. And I don't, you know, so we'll see. But I would like to have David on the same.
- [84:18]
Jamie
The same island as him.
- [84:19]
Clayton Morris
So who does?
- [84:21]
Jamie
A friend of mine.
- [84:22]
Clayton Morris
Oh, sweet. Yeah, I would love to have David IC on. But you know what's funny about David is, like, He'll. He'll pose because, you know, he's an older guy at this point. Like, he. He was. He was out there, like, in the early 19 after he had his, like, awakening. I'm reading his book right now called the Trap, and he talked about his awakening, I think, in 1990. So he had this, like, awakening and awareness, like, before. Like, really before the Internet, you know, so there's a. Like, a lot of young people coming up who are, like, discovering these things on their own. They might have never even heard of David, Ike. But he'll, like. He always, like. Then he'll, like, tweet at these people and he'd be like, duh, welcome to the show. Like, I think that's a little harsh, I'll be honest with you. Because it's like, well, not everyone knows who you are, you know, Like, I don't walk around thinking anyone knows who I am, so. But I get it. He's been like. He's. He's sold out Wembley Stadium, for crying out loud, right? So he's had huge audiences. But there's a lot of people that are just, like, kind of coming up now or discovering these things on their own. They're having these awakenings themselves. They're seeing what happened. Maybe it was Covid was really the catalyst for them and the lockdowns. They lost a loved one with this whole scheme, and they had this awakening, you know. So all I would say to David is just maybe go easy on some of those people who don't know who you are and who have kind of come up and figured it out separately. You know, I. I walk around that.
- [85:47]
Jamie
Way just with the whole mentality of fake it till you make it, you know, like.
- [85:54]
Philip (Technical Director)
Well, I just. I mean, when you think about. Because I was talking with my daughter yesterday about, like, you know, like. Like, sometimes we'll have people on the show and I've never heard of them, or sometimes, like, we'll have somebody on the show and then I'll. I'll know a bunch about them and maybe like, you know, like, Natalie didn't know about him or something like that. And it's like, the number of people that are out there is pretty huge. And so, like, it's great that you've. If somebody's discovered somebody and they like their content, but there's. There's just impossible to know everybody, you know what I mean? Like, just to be aware of literally every person, even in, like. Even in, like, fields or things that I'm interested in. I don't know. I still run into people that I'm like, oh, I've never heard of this person. They're like, oh, they, they're a really prominent, you know, like this or that. And I'm like, I've never heard of them. I mean, it's just gaps in knowledge. We all have it.
- [86:37]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. Jason Handy, five dollar super chat says please have Billy Myers, USA representative of Michael Horn on again, predictions like the two USA civil wars, the danger of impact 2029. I talk with Michael regularly. Michael and I email all the time because he'll send me. He'll be like, hey, you see what's happening right now? And he believes obviously there's a massive war coming to Scandinavia based on Billy Myers predictions. If you don't know Billy Myers predictions, his pro, you know, you should really study that because it's fascinating. But. And he's been spot on. And copyrighted material like they're printed in books and copywritten and then decades later, like these things come true and they happen. Any basic. So anyway, long story short, like on the coming war in Scandinavia.
- [87:31]
Philip (Technical Director)
No.
- [87:31]
Clayton Morris
Michael does a great job. If you want to read his work over@theyflyblog.com he really looks at a lot of the current events that are happening in the context of the Billy Meier, I guess you could call them prophecies if you want to dive deep. I've done a couple of deep dive interviews with Michael and yeah, I would love to have him back on maybe in the next month or so to kind of look at the year ahead with some of these prophecies for sure. But they've come true time and time again. They've been proven true and people try to keep they. They do all they can to try to debunk it, but they can't. Lux Dove says, have you seen the Josh Hammer retweet of President Trump talking about public executions on September 9, one day before Charlie was murdered? I don't think I've seen that.
- [88:24]
Jamie
Yeah, I just saw that yesterday. He tweeted it on the 9th.
- [88:30]
Clayton Morris
Where.
- [88:30]
Jamie
Trump was like saying something about bring back public executions or something like that.
- [88:38]
Clayton Morris
Jeff says, copyrighted, not copywritten. Thank you. People will correct you no matter what in life. I appreciate that, Jeff, but you're correct.
- [88:50]
Philip (Technical Director)
I once heard, like, if you want answers, don't ask a question. Like on Reddit. Like, if you want to actually get an answer of something, don't ask a question because nobody will answer it. Post something that you know is wrong and somebody will immediately tell you.
- [89:04]
Clayton Morris
That'S great. Hey, guys, I need help. I'm trying to figure this out. No one will answer it. But post. I'm rebuilding my PC and I put this type of graphics card in here and, you know, and I think it looks great. People be like, you're an idiot. Why did you use that graphics card with that monitor? Actually. Actually.
- [89:24]
Nick Stout
Yep.
- [89:25]
Philip (Technical Director)
That's how you do it.
- [89:26]
Clayton Morris
Exactly. Bill Lumberg. Yeah, I'm gonna need that. Those TPS reports. Trump was talking about the Ukrainian. Oh, Trump was talking about the Ukrainian girl that died. Bill Lumberg says. Yeah. George Galloway was arrested. What? No. What? For what?
- [89:49]
Natalie Morris
What?
- [89:50]
Clayton Morris
Someone just said George Galloway was arrested for being honest. Our friend George was arrested. What? No. Was he?
- [89:57]
Jamie
Hope not.
- [90:03]
Clayton Morris
I don't see anything about that.
- [90:08]
Jamie
Might you be getting trolled?
- [90:10]
Clayton Morris
No, I think he just did a show yesterday, so unless he was. Something happened that I missed overnight.
- [90:15]
Philip (Technical Director)
I'm seeing a BBC article that he was. He was stopped by counter terror police at Gatwick, but he was not arrested.
- [90:22]
Clayton Morris
Okay, that was that today?
- [90:24]
Jamie
No, that was.
- [90:24]
Philip (Technical Director)
No, that was September 27th.
- [90:26]
Clayton Morris
Oh, yeah. But nevertheless, they feel the need to stop these people all the time. Our friend of the show, Linneman, from the IT crowd, who was a guest on our show, he was detained for like, what, eight hours for his trans tweets in the uk? It's crazy over there.
- [90:48]
Nick Stout
Yep.
- [90:49]
Philip (Technical Director)
And the government banned him from Twitter. Not like Twitter didn't ban him from Twitter. The government said he's not allowed to tweet anymore.
- [90:57]
Jamie
That's crazy.
- [91:00]
Clayton Morris
Lux Dove says, oh, it was a post. It was a post Trump made back in 2012, so he had to search through all of his posts to find it. Gotcha. Where's that list of churches? What's the list of churches? Yeah, we're going to get that from Nick and we'll put it in the show description today. And then we'll also when we. All of our interviews, we usually cut them down and release them later. We'll make sure that it's in that description as well. Philip, can we make sure that. That. Yep.
- [91:32]
Philip (Technical Director)
If you can get that to me, because I'm.
- [91:35]
Clayton Morris
Yep.
- [91:35]
Philip (Technical Director)
I'll try to turn that one around pretty quick after the show.
- [91:38]
Clayton Morris
Cool. Alexi says Clayton 3i Atlas looks nothing like a long cylinder. That's an artifact from long exposure time without tracking, I think. Right. I know what you're saying. I think his point was that given that long exposure. It looks like. It looks like that. The. The artifacting. Combat. No, I won't read that one. Thank you. Combat. All right, well, thank you guys for subscribing to the show. It's again, free to subscribe. I should mention we have a daily newsletter. How many of you are subscribed to our free newsletter? We don't sell your data. I know you are, but if you just go to redacted.inc we publish the newsletter first thing in the morning. Let me just give you a little insight here. Like after the show, show, Natalie starts working on the newsletter for the next morning. And so like, she'll be writing like pretty much all night. And that, that's the newsletter that you receive in your inbox the next morning. We go through and we pick different stories that we want to cover so that you know that we couldn't cover here in the show today. Stuff that's like breaking as the night, as the night goes on. And so that when you're, when you wake up first thing in the morning, you have a nice newsletter full of stories that the mainstream, mainstream media is largely ignoring. And you can read in about five or 10 minutes over your cup of coffee. But she works really, really hard just to give you an example, like tonight, not to, not for you to say, oh, boo hoo, like you guys have a tough. But anyway, we have to go to like take the girls to dance class, go to my son's like orchestra thing. Then, then the, the other child has like a swim class, swim meet. It's all crazy. But anyway, Natalie's like, I'm just to going to bring my laptop and I'll work on the newsletter in between drop offs, in between dropping the kids. Hey, we're a small operation here, so we're a small team. And so thank you for your support and thanks for subscribing to the newsletter. We don't have a Rupert Murdoch kind of money and billions of dollars in funding. We don't have that kind of Barry Weiss money that she's getting from CBS News, Larry Ellison money. We're just a small operation here and redacted. So thank you so much for supporting our show and subscribing. It's all free and the newsletter is free. And thanks for being a part of our benefits here.
- [93:56]
Jamie
If, if her valuation was what it was, based on her views, we'd be like a 6 billion dollar corporation or.
- [94:04]
Clayton Morris
Can we just talk about that real quick? So I don't know if you guys saw Barry Weiss. You know, she's now going to be the head of CBS News and all that. There she is. Yeah, and very pro Zionist. She calls herself A fanatical Zionist, actually. So now she's gonna be in charge of all CBS News. So look for really critical news coverage of what's happening in Gaza and the war. I'm sure you'll get it at CBS News. But her. Can you explain the valuation? So when they offered her, they gave her $650 million in. They bought her her website, Free Press or something like that. How did it get rolled in? Yeah, yeah, her substack.
- [94:44]
Jamie
Yeah, it. And the thing is, like, if you look at like all the views and everything like that, like, it's not this big, huge thing that's. That would be worth that. Like. Like we would not be able to sell our. Our channel for that. And our views crush hers. It's basically only the fact that Larry Allison wanted her in charge to spread propaganda. That's all it was 100.
- [95:11]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. Because if you like they're. People are joking that her hot. Her most viewed video was called Inside the Mossad, where basically she's asking a question.
- [95:22]
Dr. Michael Sala
What is the Mossad?
- [95:23]
Jamie
I don't even know what that is. I hear it all the time.
- [95:25]
Clayton Morris
What is odd. I hear about. I hear there's this thing called Mossad. And you were inside. Like, what's that about? Okay, you don't know what Mossad is. This is good acting on your part. But that's like her most viewed video. Almost all of them have like 10,000 views. 20,000 views. 9,000 views. And they gave her $650 million. Okay, well.
- [95:52]
Jamie
And think of what she's going to get paid work in there as the editor in chief. That's probably not a bad chunk of change itself. Her annual salary.
- [95:59]
Clayton Morris
I mean, we have. I'm just looking at her subscribers. I mean, she has a fraction of the subscribers that redacted does not even close. Like, redacted crushes her across subscribers views. They gave her 650 million for that. Talk about propaganda in action. You're seeing it right there.
- [96:20]
Philip (Technical Director)
Anyway, and we're missing out. We're missing out on that sweet, sweet Israeli propaganda money, man.
- [96:26]
Clayton Morris
I guess we really should go all in. So can you tell me about what is Mossad? I've heard this. There's a thing called Mossad. What's that about?
- [96:34]
Jamie
Hey, Jamie. Jamie, look that up, will you? Am I using that right?
- [96:36]
Clayton Morris
Yeah, can you guys. Can you guys look that up? What is that? No, see, can you say that again? It's called Massad. Can you look that up? I just want to. Never heard that before.
- [96:45]
Jamie
Did you ever see the episode of Joe Rogan, where she called Tulsi Gabbard a toady for. What was it? Syrian guy Assad. And she's like. Joe's like, I don't think you should be calling her that. Like, she got. Did I use that right? Did I what? He's like, what's a toady? And she's like, oh, I'm. I don't know. I didn't. I don't know if I use that right. Jamie, can you look that up? She's like, using words she don't even know the definition to.
- [97:13]
Clayton Morris
Yeah, it's a famous video where he just, like, destroyed her. I don't know. Anyway, it's just like, maybe that should be the. Someone said in the chat, Dragon Fire says. Yeah, it's all facade. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. But, yeah, I'll do. I'm gonna start doing that. So we'll. We'll start. We'll become like an as. Like a pro Zionist show. Like, we'll be like pro genocide and all of that. And we'll.
- [97:41]
Dr. Michael Sala
We'll.
- [97:41]
Clayton Morris
We'll start doing segments every day about how, like, we think it's great that they're turning Gaza into a parking lot and that, you know, Israel will then be able to steal all of that natural gas. Trillions of cubic. Cubic. Cubic.
- [97:54]
Philip (Technical Director)
Nice. It will be for the Palestinians to have all these nice things now that we're providing for them.
- [98:00]
Clayton Morris
Yeah. They'll have nice new condominiums. It'll have full biometric surveillance. So they'll be tracked 247 and watched. Like, this is fantastic. And then I'll just ask questions like, what is Mossad? Like, I don't know what that is. Like, are they seem like good guys? I like that name. Assad sounds like a good thing.
- [98:16]
Philip (Technical Director)
I imagine by the time we do, that would be the last time my daughter would ever speak to me again.
- [98:21]
Dr. Michael Sala
Right.
- [98:23]
Clayton Morris
Oh, my God. Israeli flag pin. Do you see those new flag pins that Glenn Beck is pushing where they're like an American flag and it's like, next to an Israeli flag? Yeah. Show your support.
- [98:36]
Jamie
And they're pushing them for free.
- [98:38]
Clayton Morris
And get it for free. Here's your American flag with an Israeli flag stuck on the side of it? No, thanks. I'm an American, so I'm gonna wear an American flag. That's what I'm gonna do. But thank you for that Glenn Beck. Show your Support on this October 7th. And we will not be able to talk about at all. We would absolutely. On this new show, this new regime that we're gonna launch here to get all this Israeli money. We're not gonna talk about the stand down orders on October 7th. We won't talk about that. We won't talk about any of that. And we'll talk about how Benjamin Netanyahu is loved by 100% of the people in Israel. 100%. There's no dissent. Everyone loves him. We'll talk about that too. What is massad? Stanley Davis is like saying how uninformed you guys are. I hope he's. I hope he knows we're joking, by the way. Yeah, but. Yeah, yeah. Don't kill the ostriches. Kelvin. Kelvin, just email me. I'll make sure the team looks out for it. Just Send it to claytonedacted.inc Calvin says he has 100% proof of Charlie Kirk's killer. So send it to me. Kelvin, I get a lot of emails from people with a lot of Charlie Kirk theories. So send it on over to me. I appreciate it. All right, thank you guys so much for joining us today. Really appreciate it. Thanks for hanging out again. Oh, yeah, we can't mention, as Richard says, don't mention the Hannibal directive. Can't mention that either. I won't mention that. On the new show.
- [100:08]
Jamie
It's off limits.
- [100:11]
Clayton Morris
Bill Lumberg says Bibby should get a Nobel Prize for liberating the poor people in Gaza. Exactly. They're liberated. They are liberated. All right, everyone, thanks so much for joining us. We'll see you tomorrow, 4pM Eastern Time. Have a great night, everyone.